ACCREDITATION DOCUMENT THE RADIOGRAPHER

Similar documents
Breast Imaging Essentials

POSITIONING ACR REQUIREMENTS IMAGE REVIEW CATEGORIES DEFICIENCIES IN POSITIONING ACR REQUIREMENTS 3/28/2016 NUMBER 1 REASON FOR ACR FAILURE

Mammography. What is Mammography? What are some common uses of the procedure?

Breast positioning system for full field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis system

Accreditation Case Review: Mammography and Stereotactic Biopsy

The Radiology Aspects

Breast Cancer Screening Factsheet

Epworth Healthcare Benign Breast Disease Symposium. Sat Nov 12 th 2016

Automating Quality Assurance Metrics to Assess Adequate Breast Positioning in Mammography

Introduction 1. Executive Summary 5

Mammographic Breast Density Classification by a Deep Learning Approach

CHAPTER 2 MAMMOGRAMS AND COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION

Breast asymmetries in mammography: Management

The exact cause of breast cancer remains unknown, yet certain factors are linked to the chance of getting the disease. They are as below:

Since its introduction in 2000, digital mammography has become

Current issues and controversies in breast imaging. Kate Brown, South GP CME 2015

6 Reasons Nipple Markers Add Value in Positioning and Image Critique:

Computerized image analysis: Estimation of breast density on mammograms

BARC/2013/E/019 BARC/2013/E/019. AUDIT OF MAMMOGRAPHY PERFORMED IN OUR HOSPITAL by Surita Kantharia Medical Division

Survey of Mammography Practice: Initial Results from Serbia

Breast Tomosynthesis. What is breast tomosynthesis?

Revisiting image quality assessment A revised version PGAI

BreastScreen Victoria Annual Statistical Report

Session 2: The Role of Specialist Radiology Technologists

MAMMOGRAPHY QC: MORE THAN PHANTOM IMAGES. Stephanie Schofield RTR QC Technologist Nova Scotia Health Authority

BreastScreen Victoria Annual Statistical Report

Breast Imaging & You

Comparison Study: Impact of Thin Protective Coverlets on Positioning and Tissue Acquisition in Breast Imaging

Hong Kong College of Radiologists Mammography Statement

Corporate Medical Policy

Standard Breast Imaging Modalities. Lilian Wang, M.D. Breast Imaging Section Department of Radiology Northwestern Medicine

BreastScreen Queensland Gold Coast Service. General Practice Nurses Forum Thursday 4 May 2017

BreastScreen Victoria Annual Statistical Report

Mammography Quality Control: A Refresher

Mammography. What is Mammography?

EXAMINATION CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS ARRT BOARD APPROVED: JANUARY 2017 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JULY 1, 2017

CASE STUDIES. Population. Compression

CURRENTLY FDA APPROVED ARE FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEMS AND FILM SCREEN STILL BEING USED AT SOME INSTITUTIONS

Practitioner compression force variation in mammography : a 6 year study

The Mammography Examination

Guidelines for. Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening

BreastScreen Victoria Annual Statistical Report

Enhanced Continuing Professional Development and Personal Development Planning

Breast Thermography A radiation-free breast health assessment suitable for young women By Janet van Dam Medical Thermographer/ Member ACCT

ORIGINAL ARTICLE EVALUATION OF BREAST LESIONS USING X-RAY MAMMOGRAM WITH HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION

THE DIAGNOSTIC WORKUP: THE TEAM APPROACH

Mammography is a most effective imaging modality in early breast cancer detection. The radiographs are searched for signs of abnormality by expert

SOUTH WEST of SCOTLAND BREAST SCREENING SERVICE

RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. L19: Optimization of Protection in Mammography

The early detection programme for breast cancer

RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF BREAST CANCER

Galactography (Ductography)

Programme Report

The American College of Radiology Digital Mammography QC Manual: Frequently Asked Questions (Revised 12/12/2018; new and updated items in red)

Mammograms Obtained with Rhodium vs Molybdenum Anodes: Contrast and Dose Differences

Breast Imaging & You

Ascertaining and reporting interval cancers in BreastScreen Aotearoa: A protocol NATIONAL SCREENING UNIT (NSU) MINISTRY OF HEALTH

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis from a first idea to clinical routine

Impact of digitalization of mammographic units on average glandular doses in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Program

The role of quality assurance

Mammography. Background and Perspective. Mammography Evolution. Background and Perspective. T.R. Nelson, Ph.D. x41433

Kish chakrabarti, Ph.D. Senior Physicist CDRH/FDA

WHAT TO EXPECT. Breast Tomosynthesis An additional screening tool in the fight against breast cancer HOLOGIC. The Women's Health Company

European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer. Annual Declaration of Interests (ADoI)

European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer. Annual Declaration of Interests (ADoI)

Disclosures. Breast Cancer. Breast Imaging Modalities. Breast Cancer Screening. Breast Cancer 6/4/2014

Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography

Standardizing mammographic breast compression: Pressure rather than force?

Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast

Detection of architectural distortion using multilayer back propagation neural network

Disclosures. Outline. Learning Objectives. Introduction. Introduction. Stereotactic Breast Biopsy vs Mammography: Image Quality and Dose.

Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration 5600 Fishers Lane, (HFI-40) Rockville, MD March 2000 (FDA)

Policy Library Clinical Advantages of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Symptomatic Patients

Session 4: Test instruments to assess interpretive performance challenges and opportunities Overview of Test Set Design and Use

Part 1 to be completed by the applicant Forename:

The value of the craniocaudal mammographic view in breast cancer detection: A preliminary study

Large health system benefits from multiple scanners for breast MRI

National Programme for Breast Cancer Screening. Invitation

Education: Bachelor s degree from an approved program recognized by the Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology (JRCERT).

Presented by: Lillian Erdahl, MD

Gynecomastia and Its Mimics: Not All Male Breast Lesions are Benign

UPMC 1 Delineation of Privileges Request Criteria Summary Sheet

arxiv: v2 [cs.cv] 8 Mar 2018

A Guide to End-point Assessment: Hair Professional

Breast Imaging Donald L. Renfrew, MD

The Northern Ireland breast screening programme

Clinical Comparison of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Screen- Film Mammography for Detection of Breast Cancer

International Day of Radiology 2016 Interview on Breast Imaging Australia / Dr. Michelle Reintals. Breast imaging in Australia

NJ CBCT Regulation FAQ & Assistance

Lifetime risk of radiation-induced cancer from screening mammography

ACRIN 6666 IM Additional Evaluation: Additional Views/Targeted US

3D Conformal Radiation Therapy for Mucinous Carcinoma of the Breast

Breast density in quantifying breast cancer risk 9 December 2016

Non-Discrimination Statement and Multi-Language Interpreter Services information are located at the end of this document.

Breast Tomosynthesis An additional screening tool in the fight against breast cancer

Information leaflet for women with a slightly increased risk of breast cancer. Breast cancer in the family

The Practice Standards for Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy. Sonography Practice Standards

Deep-Learning Based Semantic Labeling for 2D Mammography & Comparison of Complexity for Machine Learning Tasks

TMIST: Frequently Asked Questions

Transcription:

ACCREDITATION DOCUMENT THE RADIOGRAPHER Nijmegen, October 2012

1. Introduction An optimal quality of mammography is one of the fundamental requirements for successful breast cancer screening programmes. Screening should enable the detection of subtle abnormalities so that tumours can be detected at an early stage. Each screening mammogram therefore has to comply with the highest quality standards with regards to positioning technique and physico-technical quality. The LRCB has drawn up the quality criteria for these standards. The screening radiologist is, during the review, completely dependent on the radiographer who is responsible for the production of the mammogram. In screening practice, an exceptional situation with regards to quality occurs: the radiographer works independently and is responsible for evaluating the quality of his/her own work. Additionally, the radiographer fulfils a crucial role regarding the experience, satisfaction and continued screening participation of the woman. A high participation rate is essential for the success of any screening programme, therefore the radiographer should possess the knowledge, attitude and skills required to perform and produce an optimal screening mammogram. At the same time, he/she has to ensure that the complete process is conducted in a manner acceptable to the woman. In order to ensure that the quality of the breast cancer screening programme is optimised and assured, the LRCB has been commissioned by the RIVM 1 to conduct the following tasks: quality control of medical knowledge and physico-technical quality; management & maintenance of an (inter)national knowledge base; scientific research; registration and accreditation of all professionals involved in the national breast cancer screening programme. This means that, after having successfully completed the required training for this role, the LRCB will evaluate whether the radiographer has the relevant qualifications. These qualifications, in the form of learning objectives, can be found in Chapter 2. Should the radiographer fulfil the conditions of these learning outcomes, then he/she will be accredited for the screening programme and included in the register. In addition, each screening unit will be audited every three years. During these audits, the medicalcontent quality of the screening is assessed. In this case, the audit committee evaluate the results of the screening output of the complete screening unit, rather than the individual practitioners themselves. The quality requirements for the work of the radiographers collectively can be found in Chapter 3. Once approved, these guidelines will replace the current document titled Taken, verantwoordelijkheden en bevoegdheden (Tasks, responsibilities and competences) that has been used in practice for a long time. The guidelines describe the quality requirements for a radiographer to participate in the screening programme and the evaluation criteria on which they are assessed. These requirements and criteria are assessed against the 2012 Policy Framework for Population Screening for Cancer. Only those guidelines set by the government, are included in this document. This document will be reviewed and changed should new or different decisions be made 1 National Institute for Public Health and the Environment

by policy-makers.

2. Course programme In order to assure the quality of screening, radiographers are required to have successfully completed a specifically designed course programme. The radiographer has to prove that he/she actually has the required qualifications before being employed in screening programmes. The LRCB, under commission from the RIVM, evaluates the radiographers knowledge and skills at the end of the course. The aim of the evaluation is to determine whether the radiographer, having completed the course, is fully compliant with the learning objectives, and therefore able to work in the screening programme. Should the radiographer comply with all the requirements, then he/she is awarded a certificate from the LRCB and is thereby accredited to work as radiographer in the screening programme. A register is kept of all accredited radiographers. The competences of the radiographer with regard to the following learning objectives are assessed: 1. Mammography positioning technique and medical imaging The radiographer is able to independently perform a breast examination with an optimal mammographic quality according to the LRCB guidelines (see appendix). This means that the radiographer is able to: correctly instruct the client for a craniocaudal (CC) view; correctly position the client for a craniocaudal (CC) view, taking the client s condition and ability into account; correctly instruct the client for a mediolateral oblique (MLO) view; correctly position the client for a mediolateral oblique (MLO) taking the client s condition and ability into account; position their own body correctly (ergonomically correct) and describe the value of doing so; describe the anatomy of the breast; describe the pathology of the breast; describe the anatomy of the breast on a mammogram; list the criteria which have to be met for a good CC image; list the criteria which have to be met for a good MLO image; evaluate whether the images comply with the required quality criteria; decide whether to (re)take one or more images if these do not meet the required quality criteria; in the case when an image does not meet the required quality criteria, describe how this image can be improved; describe when which additional views have to be made; evaluate whether making additional views adds value; take the decision to make additional views;

instruct the client regarding an additional image (see a p p e n d i x : additional views); position the client for an additional view, taking into account the client s condition and ability; inspect the client s breast and note relevant physical characteristics and/or abnormalities (for example breast lumps, ((bloody) nipple discharge, nipple eczema, and inversion); describe the reasons for when, during the screening, the client should be advised to visit their GP; recognize common benign and malignant breast conditions. 2. Client focus The radiographer is able to conduct a breast examination in a manner acceptable manner to the client. This means that the radiographer is able to: conduct an intake with the client, wherein at least the process of the examination and the importance of compression are discussed; respect the client s privacy; respect the client s ethnicity; react appropriately to verbal and non-verbal emotional reactions; instruct the client regarding a craniocaudal (CC) image; position the client for a craniocaudal (CC), taking the client s condition and ability into account; instruct the client regarding a mediolateral oblique (MLO) image; position the client for a mediolateral oblique (MLO) image, taking the client s condition and ability into account; finish off the examination and discuss the following steps in the process with the client; take necessary measures to ensure personal body hygiene; ensure the examination room is in a clean, tidy and working state following the examination.

3. Ensuring physico-technical quality The radiographer is able to recognize problems of a physico-technical nature and act accordingly, and apply the weekly quality control procedure. This means that the radiographer is able to: name and describe the components, function and operation of a mammography unit; describe the characteristics and workings of X-rays, filtering and anti-scatter grid; describe the workings of the automatic exposure control; describe the image processing and display process; master the exposure technique; describe how contrast, resolution, noise and artefacts affect image quality; recognize artefacts and act accordingly; calibrate the detector and explain why this is necessary; explain the influence of radiation on the human body; explain the ALARA principle and apply it in practice; produce a phantom image as part of the weekly quality control procedure; send the required data to the LRCB using a data-communication program. 3. Audit Every reading unit (Radiologists and radiographers) is audited structurally every three years. During audits, the medical-content quality of the screening is evaluated. The audit does not review individual professional performance, but evaluates the overall quality of the reading unit in question. In this way, the collective work of the radiographer s team is reviewed. The accreditation is based on the following quality standards: 1. Positioning* At least 90% of the images fulfil the quality criteria drawn up by the LRCB with regards to mammographic positioning (see appendix 1); In a minimum of 97% of the cases whereby an additional view is required, the additional image was produced; Less than 3% of the images have to be retaken. *Additional training on this point may be necessary.

2. Experience and additional training 100% of the radiographers have been awarded the LRCB certificate; 100% of the radiographers have taken a minimum of 6,400 images* annually or 19,200 images in 3 years; 100% of the radiographers have attended an image-analysis meeting with a screening radiologist, at least 4 times annually or 12 times in 3 years; 100% of the radiographers have attended at least 1 hour per year or 3 hours per 3 years of additional training in the field of physics / radiation protection; 100% of the radiographers have attended at least 4 hours per year or 12 hours per 3 years of additional training in the field of mammography, of which at least 1/3 focuses on practical positioning skills. The audit results in a report. In the report, it is noted that the radiographers forming part of the reading unit have participated in the audit. *Based on standard CC-images. This signal-value was introduced in 2013 and is derived from the European standard based on screening numbers achieved in two days of screening. The value of this signal-value in Dutch screening practice will be evaluated after 18 months.

Appendix 1: Quality criteria mammographic positioning General quality criteria The following general quality criteria apply to the standard views as well as the additional views used for mammograms: Each mammogram should demonstrate the soft tissue over the chest wall; this can be accomplished by following a standardised positioning procedure Preferably, no skin folds should be visible on the mammograms Only the breast tissue and part of the musculus pectoralis major should be visible on the images and not the shoulder, chin or hair The mammae need to be compressed during the examination in order to spread out the breast tissue and increase image sharpness, complying the applicable standard* Avoid patient movement during exposure to prevent occurrence of blurring or unsharp images The physico-technical aspects of the images should comply with the applicable standard* The relevant identifying marks should be included on each image * www.lrcb.nl Standard views Craniocaudal view (CC) The images of both mammae should be symmetrical The image should include the entire medial side and as much of the lateral side as possible The fibroglandular tissue is entirely visible and evenly spread out The image should include a part of the musculus pectoralis major The nipple should be visible in profile in the middle of the image Mediolateral oblique view (MLO) The images of both mammae should be symmetrical The image should show the musculus pectoralis major sufficiently wide The image should show the musculus pectoralis major up to the nipple level The image should include the entire fibroglandular tissue spread out evenly and distributed as much as possible The image should include the inframammary fold The nipple should be imaged in profile

Additional views Lateromedial view (LM) en mediolateral view (ML) The image of the musculus pectoralis major should be narrow and steep The entire fibroglandular tissue should be visible and should be evenly spread out The inframammary angle should be visible The nipple should be in profile An LM or ML view should be considered for the following reasons: To determine the exact location of a lesion for mamma localisation or for a biopsy To obtain a better image of a lesion in the medial breast region To obtain a better image of a lesion in the inframammary angle If a lesion is visible in only one of the standard views To demonstrate or exclude the possibility of superposition Cleopatra view (XCCL) (exaggerated craniocaudal view) The axillary tail should be completely visible A narrow and steep image of the musculus pectoralis major should be visible in the lateral part The nipple should be in profile The Cleopatra view should be considered in either of the following two cases: If it is not possible to obtain an adequate image of the lateral portion of the mamma using only the standard CC view If in the MLO view a lesion is visible only in the lateral part of the fi broglandular tissue Cleavage view (CV) The medial portion of both mammae should be sufficiently visible The Cleavage view should be considered in either of the following two cases: The medial side is insufficiently visible on the standard views A lesion is suspected in the medial portion of the mamma or between the mammae Rolled lateral view (RL) en rolled medial view (RM) The image should include the entire medial side and as much of the lateral side as possible

The image should include the entire fibroglandular tissue, distributed and evenly spread out as much as possible The image should include a part of the musculus pectoralis major The nipple should be visible in profile in the middle of the image A rolled view is performed for the following reasons: Making a lesion more visible that is located in dense tissue on a CC view or, much less frequently, on a MLO view Demonstrating or excluding the presence of a superimposed object