Research on opioid overdose and naloxone distribution in San Francisco: from epidemiology to intervention development to implementation. Alex H. Kral, PhD Director Behavioral and Urban Health Program RTI International San Francisco Overdosekonferansen, Bergen, Norway August 31, 2015 www.rti.org RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute
Overview Timeline Research Activity 1998-2000 Observational studies to assess scope of opioid overdose problem 1999-2000 Feasibility studies to assess viability of naloxone intervention 2001-2002 Pilot naloxone intervention study 2003-2014 Evaluation of naloxone intervention 2015 - Implementation science approach to assessing how to best implement naloxone interventions
San Francisco Bay Area Map Population Sizes 2015 San Francisco: 849,774 Oakland: 390,724 Richmond: 103,701 3
Observational Studies Scope of opioid overdose problem in San Francisco Nonfatal Overdoses Fatal Overdoses 4
Prevalence and Factors Associated with Nonfatal Opioid Overdose among People who Inject Heroin 1,427 people who inject heroin recruited in 1998/1999 using targeted sampling in SF. 48% had ever had an overdose, 33% had experienced >1 overdose, and 13% had recent overdose. In multiple logistic regression, recent OD was associated with being: Younger, arrested >2 times past year, Drinking >3 alcoholic drinks per day, participated in methadone detoxification during the past year, and being homeless. 5 Seal, K. H., Kral, A. H., Gee, L., Moore, L. D., Bluthenthal, R. N., Lorvick, J., et al. (2001). Predictors and prevention of non-fatal overdose among street-recruited injection heroin users in the San Francisco Bay Area, 1998 1999. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1842 1846.
Opioid Overdose Mortality, SF 1997-2000 Davidson, P. J., McLean, R. L., Kral, A. H., Gleghorn, A. A., Edlin, B. R., & Moss, A. R. (2003). Fatal heroin-related overdose in San Francisco 1997 2000: A case for targeted intervention. Journal of Urban Health, 80, 261 273. 6
Feasibility of Peer Naloxone Intervention Chicago Recover Alliance started providing naloxone and overdose training in 1999 at their syringe exchange sites. Shortly thereafter, San Francisco Needle Exchange started an underground naloxone intervention with their participants. Both of these early interventions involved substantial education components that involved CPR training and many hours of attendance. We decided to assess whether people who inject drugs (PWID) would be interested in such trainings. Sporer, K., & Kral, A. H. (2007). Prescription naloxone: A novel approach to heroin overdose prevention. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 49(2), 172 177.
Feasibility of Peer Naloxone Intervention 1999-2000 Survey of 82 street-recruited PWID in San Francisco 89% had ever witnessed an overdose 90% of them used lay interventions 51% had called 911 for ambulance 87% were strongly in favor of being trained and receiving naloxone. Seal, K. H., Downing, M., Kral, A. H., Singleton-Banks, S., Hammond, J. P., Lorvick, J., et al. (2003). Attitudes about prescribing take-home naloxone to injection drug users for the management of heroin overdose: A survey of street-recruited injectors in the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of Urban Health, 80, 291 301.
Opiate Overdose Pilot Intervention 2001 Pilot study of an overdose prevention and naloxone distribution intervention, 2001 (N = 24) Offered study participation to twelve couples who had participated in our larger study. Trained them in overdose prevention, naloxone use, and CPR over two sessions totaling 8 hours. Provided naloxone. Interviewed them at 6 months follow-up. Seal, K. H., Thawley, R., Gee, L., Bamberger, J., Kral, A. H., Ciccarone, D., et al. (2005). Naloxone distribution and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for injection drug users to prevent heroin overdose death: A pilot intervention study. Journal of Urban Health, 82, 303 311. 9
Opiate Overdose Pilot Intervention 2001 Pilot study of an overdose prevention and naloxone distribution intervention, 2001 (N = 24) Six Months Post-Intervention Participants witnessed 20 heroin overdoses. CPR and/or rescue breathing performed in 16 events (80%). Naloxone administered in 15 events (75%). Naloxone or CPR administered in 19 events (95%). All 20 overdose victims survived. Seal, K. H., Thawley, R., Gee, L., Bamberger, J., Kral, A. H., Ciccarone, D., et al. (2005). Naloxone distribution and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for injection drug users to prevent heroin overdose death: A pilot intervention study. Journal of Urban Health, 82, 303 311. 10
The DOPE Project in San Francisco From September 2003 to September 2010: 2,318 individuals were trained and prescribed naloxone through the DOPE Project 1,312 refilled naloxone prescriptions 502 reports of using naloxone during an opiate overdose event. 174 Group trainings (Methadone programs, jail, SROs), 1,770 participants 113 Service Provider trainings, 1,677 participants There is an updated study by Phillip Coffin et al recently published (Rowe et al Addiction August 2015), which I think he will speak about at this conference. Enteen, L., Morse, P., Davidson, P., Stanley, T. W., Bamberger, J., & Kral, A. H. (2010). Naloxone distribution in San Francisco: An effective strategy in preventing fatal opioid overdose. Journal of Urban Health, 87(6), 931 941.
Heroin-related Deaths, San Francisco, 1999-2012 140 120 100 Naloxone distribution begins Slide provided by Phillip Coffin New Enrollments Refills Reversals Heroin deaths 700 600 500 80 400 60 300 40 200 20 100 0 2000 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 0 *Heroin death data (left axis) compiled from San Francisco Medical Examiner Reports, www.sfgsa.org, fitted to tailing fiscal year, no data for 2001-2002, 2012 deaths preliminary estimate; Naloxone data (right axis) from DOPE Project enrollments and refills
Aims of New Implementation Science Project funded by NIDA In 2010 there were 16,651 deaths in the United States due to opioid overdose, a 3-fold increase in last decade. One of the main risk factors for opioid overdose is community reentry following incarceration, mainly because of the diminished opioid tolerance that occurs during periods of non-use while incarcerated. Binswanger et al. s study of post-release mortality in Washington state, showed that the risk of overdose death among former inmates during the 2 weeks immediately following release from incarceration was 129 times that of other state residents. 13
Aims of New Implementation Science Project funded by NIDA Aim 1.To identify barriers and facilitators to and develop solutions for the implementation of overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs in venues that target people exiting incarceration and their family members (e.g., jails, correctional visiting centers, community supervision offices, reentry organizations). Aim 2. To pilot the implementation of OEND in two promising venues identified in Aim 1 with the goal of assessing feasibility and acceptability of the implementation process among venue stakeholders. Aim 3. To develop a manual addressing the key factors and lessons learned about the implementation of OEND in venues that target people exiting incarceration and their family members for use in a subsequent implementation trial. 14
Implementation Science Project Opioid Overdose Deaths per Number of Jail Facilities Total Jail CA State Prison Yes/No Type of Number of Re-entry Focused County Year Capacity Community Programs Alameda 215 2 4,800 No Urban/ Suburban 8 Marin 33 1 293 Yes Suburban None Santa Clara 140 4 4,692 No Urban/ Suburban 1 Sonoma 78 2 1,177 No Suburban/ Rural None 15
Acknowledgements Contributors to this work over the years including Jennifer Lorvick, Peter Davidson, Eliza Wheeler, Ricky Bluthenthal, Lynn Wenger, Alexis Martinez, Karl Sporer, Brian Edlin, Karen Seal, and Dan Ciccarone. Slide contributions from Phillip Coffin Funding source: National Institute on Drug Abuse. 16
Contact Information Alex H. Kral, PhD 351 California Street Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94104 USA Mobile phone +1 415 407 0752 Email akral@rti.org 17