DATE: 8/ 1/2008 TIME: 3:32. L I S R E L 8.71 BY Karl G. J reskog & Dag S rbom

Similar documents
The following lines were read from file C:\Documents and Settings\User\Desktop\Example LISREL-CFA\cfacommand.LS8:

Large Type Fit Indices of Mathematics Adult Learners: A Covariance Structure Model

Doing Quantitative Research 26E02900, 6 ECTS Lecture 6: Structural Equations Modeling. Olli-Pekka Kauppila Daria Kautto

The MHSIP: A Tale of Three Centers

Introduction to Factor Analysis. Hsueh-Sheng Wu CFDR Workshop Series June 18, 2018

FALL 2017 ACADEMIC REPORT

Development of self efficacy and attitude toward analytic geometry scale (SAAG-S)

Applications of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in Humanities and Science Researches

Instrument equivalence across ethnic groups. Antonio Olmos (MHCD) Susan R. Hutchinson (UNC)

Errors and biases in Structural Equa2on Modeling. Jelte M. Wicherts

The advancement of the built environment research through employment of structural equation modeling (SEM)

Personal Style Inventory Item Revision: Confirmatory Factor Analysis

bivariate analysis: The statistical analysis of the relationship between two variables.

Notes for laboratory session 2

The Modification of Dichotomous and Polytomous Item Response Theory to Structural Equation Modeling Analysis

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Preschool Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) (1.5 5 yrs.) among Canadian children

Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a Measurement Model in Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

Modeling the Influential Factors of 8 th Grades Student s Mathematics Achievement in Malaysia by Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

Testing for the Validity of a Causal Structure

Title: Can self-reported disability assessment behaviour of insurance physicians be explained? Applying the ASE model

Paul Irwing, Manchester Business School

1. Objective: analyzing CD4 counts data using GEE marginal model and random effects model. Demonstrate the analysis using SAS and STATA.

Animal Welfare, Information and Consumer Behaviour

A Structural Equation Modeling: An Alternate Technique in Predicting Medical Appointment Adherence

Anale. Seria Informatică. Vol. XVI fasc Annals. Computer Science Series. 16 th Tome 1 st Fasc. 2018

International Conference on Humanities and Social Science (HSS 2016)

Chapter 2 Organizing and Summarizing Data. Chapter 3 Numerically Summarizing Data. Chapter 4 Describing the Relation between Two Variables

ANOVA. Thomas Elliott. January 29, 2013

Development and validation of Performance Enhancement Attitude Toward doping Scale in Elite Athletes of Iran


ASSESSING THE UNIDIMENSIONALITY, RELIABILITY, VALIDITY AND FITNESS OF INFLUENTIAL FACTORS OF 8 TH GRADES STUDENT S MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT IN MALAYSIA

Examination of the factor structure of critical thinking disposition scale according to different variables

Department of Educational Administration, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.

Repeated Measures ANOVA and Mixed Model ANOVA. Comparing more than two measurements of the same or matched participants

Linear Regression in SAS

What are the Relationships Between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior? An Empirical Study

(C) Jamalludin Ab Rahman

10. LINEAR REGRESSION AND CORRELATION

Small Group Presentations

CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

A Model on the Significant Factors Contributing towards the Restoration of Abandoned Residential Projects in Malaysia using AMOS-SEM.

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Online Tax System Determinants: Using A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

CLASSICAL AND. MODERN REGRESSION WITH APPLICATIONS

Analysis of moment structure program application in management and organizational behavior research

While many studies have employed Young s Internet

Reanalysis of the 1980 AFQT Data from the NLSY79 1

How!Good!Are!Our!Measures?! Investigating!the!Appropriate! Use!of!Factor!Analysis!for!Survey! Instruments!

CRITERIA FOR USE. A GRAPHICAL EXPLANATION OF BI-VARIATE (2 VARIABLE) REGRESSION ANALYSISSys

All reverse-worded items were scored accordingly and are in the appropriate direction in the data set.

Alternative Methods for Assessing the Fit of Structural Equation Models in Developmental Research

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of first order factor measurement model-ict empowerment in Nigeria

Subescala D CULTURA ORGANIZACIONAL. Factor Analysis

Examining the Model Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

QUESTIONNAIRES are commonly used in. Statistical Methodology: VIII. Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Emergency Medicine Research

Depression among human care service professionals and positive/negative work life events: a structural equation modeling analysis

Overview of Lecture. Survey Methods & Design in Psychology. Correlational statistics vs tests of differences between groups

Using Latent Growth Modeling to Understand Longitudinal Effects in MIS Theory: A Primer

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING AND REGRESSION: GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH PRACTICE

Assessing Unidimensionality Through LISREL: An Explanation and an Example

Examining the efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to understand pre-service teachers intention to use technology*

Alternative and Integrative Medicine. Attitude Questionnaire (CAIMAQ)

isc ove ring i Statistics sing SPSS

Tourism Website Customers Repurchase Intention: Information System Success Model Ming-yi HUANG 1 and Tung-liang CHEN 2,*

The Structure of Intelligence in Children and Adults With High Functioning Autism

TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology April 2012, volume 11 Issue 2

Data Analysis in Practice-Based Research. Stephen Zyzanski, PhD Department of Family Medicine Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

Personality Traits Effects on Job Satisfaction: The Role of Goal Commitment

PharmaSUG Paper SP01

JRPR. Technical Paper. Introduction. Journal of Radiation Protection and Research 2017;42(4): /jrpr

Answer to exercise: Growth of guinea pigs

11/24/2017. Do not imply a cause-and-effect relationship

Subescala B Compromisso com a organização escolar. Factor Analysis

POL 242Y Final Test (Take Home) Name

Poisson regression. Dae-Jin Lee Basque Center for Applied Mathematics.

The dual pathway model of overeating Ouwens, Machteld; van Strien, T.; van Leeuwe, J. F. J.; van der Staak, C. P. F.

Citation Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 2009, v. 18 n. 23, p

Chapter 4 Data Analysis & Results

Assessing Measurement Invariance in the Attitude to Marriage Scale across East Asian Societies. Xiaowen Zhu. Xi an Jiaotong University.

Week 8 Hour 1: More on polynomial fits. The AIC. Hour 2: Dummy Variables what are they? An NHL Example. Hour 3: Interactions. The stepwise method.

The Psychometric Properties of Dispositional Flow Scale-2 in Internet Gaming

Regression. Page 1. Variables Entered/Removed b Variables. Variables Removed. Enter. Method. Psycho_Dum

ANALYSIS ON RELATIONSHIP AMONG ANGER RUMINATION AND AGGRESSION WITH MEDIATING ROLE OF COGNITIVE EMOTION REGULATION IN ADOLESCENTS

Geographic Differences in Event Rates by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score

Age (continuous) Gender (0=Male, 1=Female) SES (1=Low, 2=Medium, 3=High) Prior Victimization (0= Not Victimized, 1=Victimized)

3. Research Methodology-Data Collection, Statistical Analysis

Factor Structure of Boredom in Iranian Adolescents

NORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY TUTORIAL 2

Goal and Process Clarity: Specification of Multiple Constructs of Role Ambiguity and a Structural Equation Model of Their Antecedents and Consequences

A 2-STAGE FACTOR ANALYSIS OF THE EMOTIONAL EXPRESSIVITY SCALE IN THE CHINESE CONTEXT

Business Statistics Probability

11/18/2013. Correlational Research. Correlational Designs. Why Use a Correlational Design? CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH STUDIES

Chapter 3 CORRELATION AND REGRESSION

Structural Modeling of Safety Performance in Construction Industry

Appendix. I. Map of former Car Doctors site. Soil for the greenhouse study was collected in the area indicated by the arrow.

Click here to unlock TallPDF.NET. Q1. What Greek Organization do you belong to? % Alpha Gamma Delta % Alpha Xi Zeta

TRIAL OF HOPELESSNESS THEORY BY THE USE OF MODELLING. NEW PSYCHOMETRIC DATA ON THE HOPELESSNESS DEPRESSION SYMPTOM QUESTIONNAIRE

Assessing adolescents perceived proficiency in critically evaluating nutrition information

CSE 258 Lecture 2. Web Mining and Recommender Systems. Supervised learning Regression

Self-Oriented and Socially Prescribed Perfectionism in the Eating Disorder Inventory Perfectionism Subscale

Transcription:

DATE: 8/ 1/2008 TIME: 3:32 L I S R E L 8.71 BY Karl G. J reskog & Dag S rbom This program is published exclusively by Scientific Software International, Inc. 7383 N. Lincoln Avenue, Suite 100 Lincolnwood, IL 60712, U.S.A. Phone: (800)247-6113, (847)675-0720, Fax: (847)675-2140 Copyright by Scientific Software International, Inc., 1981-2004 Use of this program is subject to the terms specified in the Universal Copyright Convention. Website: www.ssicentral.com The following lines were read from file C:\Documents and Settings\User\Desktop\example-SEM\sem6.LS8:!DA NI=12 NO=204 MA=CM SY='C:\Documents and Settings\User\Desktop\example-SEM\sem5.DSF' SE 1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 6 7 8 9 / MO NX=4 NY=8 NK=1 NE=2 BE=FU GA=FI PS=SY TE=SY TD=SY LE LK FR LY(2,1) LY(3,1) LY(4,1) LY(5,1) LY(7,2) LY(8,1) LY(8,2) LX(1,1) LX(2,1) FR LX(3,1) LX(4,1) BE(1,2) GA(1,1) GA(2,1) TE(2,1) TE(3,1) TE(5,3) TE(8,1) FR TE(8,5) TD(4,1) VA 0.97 LY(1,1) VA 0.60 LY(6,2) PD OU PC RS EF FS SS SC PT MR MI ND=3 Number of Input Variables 12 Number of Y - Variables 8 Number of X - Variables 4 Number of ETA - Variables 2 Number of KSI - Variables 1 Number of Observations 204 Covariance Matrix SELF1 1.896 SELF2 1.123 1.722 SELF3 1.090 1.073 1.634 SELF4 1.013 1.176 1.093 1.907 SELF5 1.177 1.228 1.143 1.427 2.113 IMPULS1 0.149 0.129 0.116 0.110 0.093 0.662 IMPULS2 0.035 0.061-0.029-0.034 0.031 0.247 IMPULS3 0.458 0.512 0.409 0.453 0.591 0.325 DEPRES1 0.947 1.017 1.035 1.233 1.499 0.063 DEPRES2 0.644 0.650 0.696 0.785 1.044 0.106 DEPRES3 0.799 0.821 0.811 0.876 1.075-0.036 DEPRES4 0.945 0.942 0.943 0.903 1.270 0.060 1

Covariance Matrix DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 IMPULS2 0.355 IMPULS3 0.217 1.369 DEPRES1-0.002 0.567 1.977 DEPRES2 0.097 0.473 1.052 1.620 DEPRES3 0.023 0.512 1.352 0.898 2.077 DEPRES4 0.017 0.532 1.278 1.068 1.253 2.028 BEHAVIOR UNDER STEEPEST DESCENT ITERATIONS ITER TRY ABSCISSA SLOPE FUNCTION 1 0 0.00000000D+00-0.40927314D+02 0.90777859D+00 1 0.10000000D+01 0.27940477D+04 0.46103352D+03 2 0.14436569D-01 0.92211634D+01 0.69368228D+00 3 0.11782013D-01 0.90606133D+00 0.68015454D+00 2 0 0.00000000D+00-0.90623846D+01 0.68015454D+00 1 0.11782013D-01-0.53448543D+01 0.59509068D+00 2 0.23564026D-01-0.14290669D+01 0.55498685D+00 3 0.47128052D-01 0.70301403D+01 0.61929149D+00 4 0.27544845D-01-0.59791344D-01 0.55201554D+00 3 0 0.00000000D+00-0.11787788D+02 0.55201554D+00 1 0.27544845D-01 0.11698000D+02 0.56451013D+00 2 0.13825075D-01 0.74761323D+00 0.47750536D+00 (deleted section) 10 0 0.00000000D+00-0.12241253D+01 0.31688128D+00 1 0.17610824D-01-0.19332480D+00 0.30434365D+00 2 0.35221647D-01 0.87634626D+00 0.31030024D+00 3 0.20793680D-01-0.29036468D-02 0.30403103D+00 Parameter Specifications LAMBDA-Y SELF1 0 0 SELF2 1 0 SELF3 2 0 SELF4 3 0 SELF5 4 0 IMPULS1 0 0 IMPULS2 0 5 IMPULS3 6 7 LAMBDA-X DEPRES1 8 DEPRES2 9 DEPRES3 10 DEPRES4 11 BETA SELFEST 0 12 IMPULSE 0 0 2

GAMMA SELFEST 13 IMPULSE 14 PSI 15 16 THETA-EPS SELF1 17 SELF2 18 19 SELF3 20 0 21 SELF4 0 0 0 22 SELF5 0 0 23 0 24 IMPULS1 0 0 0 0 0 25 IMPULS2 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPULS3 27 0 0 0 28 0 THETA-EPS IMPULS2 26 IMPULS3 0 29 THETA-DELTA DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 DEPRES1 30 DEPRES2 0 31 DEPRES3 0 0 32 DEPRES4 33 0 0 34 Initial Estimates (TSLS) LAMBDA-Y SELF1 0.970 - - SELF2 0.968 - - SELF3 0.934 - - SELF4 1.024 - - SELF5 1.175 - - IMPULS1 - - 0.600 IMPULS2 - - 0.329 IMPULS3 0.401 0.403 LAMBDA-X DEPRES1 1.399 DEPRES2 0.839 DEPRES3 0.963 DEPRES4 1.120 3

BETA SELFEST - - -0.032 IMPULSE - - - - GAMMA SELFEST 0.929 IMPULSE 0.167 Covariance Matrix of ETA and KSI SELFEST 1.089 IMPULSE 0.114 1.264 0.924 0.167 1.000 PHI 1.000 PSI Note: This matrix is diagonal. 0.233 1.237 Squared Multiple Correlations for Structural Equations 0.786 0.022 Squared Multiple Correlations for Reduced Form 0.784 0.022 Reduced Form SELFEST 0.924 IMPULSE 0.167 THETA-EPS SELF1 1.026 SELF2 0.041 0.773 SELF3 0.064 - - 0.791 SELF4 - - - - - - 0.918 SELF5 - - - - -0.030 - - 0.946 IMPULS1 - - - - - - - - - - 0.271 IMPULS2 - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPULS3 0.001 - - - - - - 0.068 - - THETA-EPS 4

IMPULS2 0.249 IMPULS3 - - 1.112 THETA-DELTA DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 DEPRES1-0.211 DEPRES2 - - 1.060 DEPRES3 - - - - 1.429 DEPRES4-0.387 - - - - 1.056 Behavior under Minimization Iterations Iter Try Abscissa Slope Function 1 0 0.00000000D+00-0.31046887D+01 0.89585031D+00 1 0.10000000D+01 0.15041446D+00 0.16683632D+00 2 0 0.00000000D+00-0.50158701D-01 0.16683632D+00 1 0.10000000D+01 0.36191114D-01 0.16807792D+00 2 0.58087792D+00 0.11372583D-01 0.15774872D+00 3 0.47351656D+00 0.30499338D-02 0.15696549D+00 3 0 0.00000000D+00-0.86239726D-02 0.15696549D+00 1 0.47351656D+00-0.52644260D-02 0.15367031D+00 2 0.94703313D+00-0.17128227D-02 0.15201019D+00 3 0.18940663D+01 0.61043040D-02 0.15400641D+00 4 0.11545390D+01-0.87590582D-04 0.15182262D+00 (deleted section) 19 0 0.00000000D+00-0.41222217D-11 0.14962735D+00 1 0.11250454D+01-0.39311162D-13 0.14962735D+00 Number of Iterations = 19 LISREL Estimates (Maximum Likelihood) LAMBDA-Y SELF1 0.970 - - SELF2 1.050 - - (0.098) 10.758 SELF3 1.058 - - (0.101) 10.524 SELF4 1.160 - - (0.117) 9.902 SELF5 1.385 - - (0.130) 10.690 IMPULS1 - - 0.600 IMPULS2 - - 0.427 (0.089) 4.783 IMPULS3 0.453 0.504 (0.090) (0.109) 5.056 4.626 5

LAMBDA-X DEPRES1 1.299 (0.080) 16.159 DEPRES2 0.848 (0.081) 10.478 DEPRES3 1.043 (0.090) 11.654 DEPRES4 1.182 (0.088) 13.387 BETA SELFEST - - 0.031 (0.053) 0.591 IMPULSE - - - - GAMMA SELFEST 0.785 (0.087) 9.009 IMPULSE 0.068 (0.086) 0.797 Covariance Matrix of ETA and KSI SELFEST 0.890 IMPULSE 0.084 0.964 0.787 0.068 1.000 PHI 1.000 PSI Note: This matrix is diagonal. 0.270 0.960 (0.061) (0.248) 4.412 3.875 Squared Multiple Correlations for Structural Equations 0.696 0.005 6

Squared Multiple Correlations for Reduced Form 0.695 0.005 Reduced Form SELFEST 0.787 (0.087) 9.022 IMPULSE 0.068 (0.086) 0.797 THETA-EPS SELF1 1.050 (0.114) 9.203 SELF2 0.201 0.740 (0.070) (0.083) 2.893 8.955 SELF3 0.154 - - 0.636 (0.070) (0.083) 2.200 7.662 SELF4 - - - - - - 0.708 (0.082) 8.608 SELF5 - - - - -0.163 - - 0.407 (0.055) (0.075) -2.949 5.432 IMPULS1 - - - - - - - - - - 0.314 (0.075) 4.183 IMPULS2 - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPULS3 0.006 - - - - - - -0.040 - - (0.070) (0.061) 0.083-0.646 THETA-EPS IMPULS2 0.180 (0.039) 4.626 IMPULS3 - - 0.903 (0.105) 8.613 Squared Multiple Correlations for Y - Variables 0.444 0.570 0.610 0.628 0.807 0.525 Squared Multiple Correlations for Y - Variables 7

0.494 0.340 THETA-DELTA DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 DEPRES1 0.290 (0.082) 3.527 DEPRES2 - - 0.900 (0.095) 9.491 DEPRES3 - - - - 0.989 (0.108) 9.157 DEPRES4-0.257 - - - - 0.631 (0.070) (0.104) -3.679 6.040 Squared Multiple Correlations for X - Variables DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 0.853 0.444 0.524 0.689 Goodness of Fit Statistics Degrees of Freedom = 44 Minimum Fit Function Chi-Square = 60.749 (P = 0.0477) Normal Theory Weighted Least Squares Chi-Square = 57.820 (P = 0.0790) Estimated Non-centrality Parameter (NCP) = 13.820 90 Percent Confidence Interval for NCP = (0.0 ; 37.644) Minimum Fit Function Value = 0.299 Population Discrepancy Function Value (F0) = 0.0681 90 Percent Confidence Interval for F0 = (0.0 ; 0.185) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.0393 90 Percent Confidence Interval for RMSEA = (0.0 ; 0.0649) P-Value for Test of Close Fit (RMSEA < 0.05) = 0.727 Expected Cross-Validation Index (ECVI) = 0.620 90 Percent Confidence Interval for ECVI = (0.552 ; 0.737) ECVI for Saturated Model = 0.768 ECVI for Independence Model = 12.796 Chi-Square for Independence Model with 66 Degrees of Freedom = 2573.633 Independence AIC = 2597.633 Model AIC = 125.820 Saturated AIC = 156.000 Independence CAIC = 2649.451 Model CAIC = 272.636 Saturated CAIC = 492.813 Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.976 Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI) = 0.990 Parsimony Normed Fit Index (PNFI) = 0.651 Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.993 Incremental Fit Index (IFI) = 0.993 Relative Fit Index (RFI) = 0.965 Critical N (CN) = 230.605 Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) = 0.0526 Standardized RMR = 0.0376 8

Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.955 Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.920 Parsimony Goodness of Fit Index (PGFI) = 0.539 Fitted Covariance Matrix SELF1 1.888 SELF2 1.108 1.722 SELF3 1.067 0.989 1.634 SELF4 1.002 1.084 1.093 1.907 SELF5 1.195 1.294 1.141 1.430 2.114 IMPULS1 0.049 0.053 0.053 0.058 0.070 0.662 IMPULS2 0.035 0.038 0.038 0.042 0.050 0.247 IMPULS3 0.438 0.467 0.471 0.517 0.577 0.315 DEPRES1 0.991 1.073 1.082 1.186 1.415 0.053 DEPRES2 0.647 0.701 0.707 0.774 0.924 0.035 DEPRES3 0.796 0.862 0.869 0.953 1.137 0.043 DEPRES4 0.902 0.977 0.984 1.079 1.288 0.048 Fitted Covariance Matrix DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 IMPULS2 0.355 IMPULS3 0.224 1.369 DEPRES1 0.038 0.507 1.977 DEPRES2 0.025 0.331 1.102 1.620 DEPRES3 0.030 0.407 1.355 0.885 2.077 DEPRES4 0.034 0.462 1.278 1.003 1.233 2.028 Fitted Residuals SELF1 0.008 SELF2 0.015 0.000 SELF3 0.023 0.083 0.000 SELF4 0.011 0.092 0.000 0.000 SELF5-0.018-0.066 0.002-0.003-0.001 IMPULS1 0.100 0.076 0.063 0.052 0.023 0.000 IMPULS2 0.000 0.023-0.067-0.075-0.018 0.000 IMPULS3 0.020 0.045-0.062-0.063 0.014 0.011 DEPRES1-0.044-0.056-0.047 0.048 0.084 0.010 DEPRES2-0.004-0.051-0.011 0.011 0.120 0.071 DEPRES3 0.003-0.041-0.058-0.077-0.062-0.078 DEPRES4 0.043-0.034-0.042-0.176-0.017 0.012 Fitted Residuals DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 IMPULS2 0.000 IMPULS3-0.007 0.001 DEPRES1-0.040 0.059 0.000 DEPRES2 0.072 0.142-0.050 0.000 DEPRES3-0.008 0.105-0.003 0.013 0.000 DEPRES4-0.018 0.070 0.000 0.065 0.019 0.000 Summary Statistics for Fitted Residuals Smallest Fitted Residual = -0.176 Median Fitted Residual = 0.000 9

Largest Fitted Residual = 0.142 Stemleaf Plot - 1 8-1 - 0 8887766666555-0 44443222211100000000000000000000 0 1111111122222244 0 556667778889 1 0024 Standardized Residuals SELF1 1.811 SELF2 1.840 - - SELF3 1.427 2.171 0.028 SELF4 0.223 2.235 0.004 - - SELF5-0.642-2.531 0.439-0.140-1.196 IMPULS1 1.628 1.421 1.242 0.963 0.506 - - IMPULS2 0.007 0.579-1.765-1.854-0.514-1.976 IMPULS3 0.635 0.782-1.218-1.171 0.763 1.531 DEPRES1-0.789-1.202-1.115 1.072 2.588 0.224 DEPRES2-0.046-0.764-0.175 0.167 2.148 1.232 DEPRES3 0.032-0.588-0.908-1.129-1.117-1.257 DEPRES4 0.617-0.584-0.772-3.089-0.387 0.218 Standardized Residuals DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 IMPULS2 - - IMPULS3-1.267 0.332 DEPRES1-1.142 1.115 - - DEPRES2 1.665 1.868-1.848 - - DEPRES3-0.169 1.304-0.120 0.218 - - DEPRES4-0.428 1.038 - - 1.462 0.441 - - Summary Statistics for Standardized Residuals Smallest Standardized Residual = -3.089 Median Standardized Residual = 0.000 Largest Standardized Residual = 2.588 Stemleaf Plot - 3 1-2 50-1 9883322221111-0 9888666544221100000000000000 0 22222344566688 1 0011223445567889 2 1226 Largest Negative Standardized Residuals Residual for DEPRES4 and SELF4-3.089 Largest Positive Standardized Residuals Residual for DEPRES1 and SELF5 2.588 Qplot of Standardized Residuals 3.5... 10

..... x... x... x... x x... x. N.. xxx. o.. x*. r.. xxx. m.. *x. a.. xx *. l..xx.. xx*. Q. xxx. u. xx. a..*. n. xx*. t. xx*.. i. x xx.. l. x.. e. x.. s. *x.. x... *... x... x... x.. -3.5... -3.5 3.5 Standardized Residuals Modification Indices and Expected Change Modification Indices for LAMBDA-Y SELF1 - - 0.714 SELF2 - - 1.289 SELF3 - - 0.588 SELF4 - - 0.553 SELF5 - - 0.051 IMPULS1 1.726 - - IMPULS2 1.726 - - 11

IMPULS3 - - - - Expected Change for LAMBDA-Y SELF1 - - 0.072 SELF2 - - 0.086 SELF3 - - -0.060 SELF4 - - -0.059 SELF5 - - -0.018 IMPULS1 0.085 - - IMPULS2-0.061 - - IMPULS3 - - - - Standardized Expected Change for LAMBDA-Y SELF1 - - 0.071 SELF2 - - 0.085 SELF3 - - -0.059 SELF4 - - -0.058 SELF5 - - -0.018 IMPULS1 0.080 - - IMPULS2-0.057 - - IMPULS3 - - - - Completely Standardized Expected Change for LAMBDA-Y SELF1 - - 0.052 SELF2 - - 0.065 SELF3 - - -0.046 SELF4 - - -0.042 SELF5 - - -0.012 IMPULS1 0.099 - - IMPULS2-0.096 - - IMPULS3 - - - - No Non-Zero Modification Indices for LAMBDA-X No Non-Zero Modification Indices for BETA No Non-Zero Modification Indices for GAMMA No Non-Zero Modification Indices for PHI No Non-Zero Modification Indices for PSI Modification Indices for THETA-EPS SELF1 - - SELF2 - - - - SELF3 - - 3.347 - - SELF4 0.068 4.719 0.000 - - SELF5 0.001 4.326 - - 0.079 - - IMPULS1 0.650 0.000 1.927 1.905 0.770 - - IMPULS2 0.001 1.116 2.319 2.596 0.511 3.908 IMPULS3 - - 0.025 1.431 1.078 - - 1.812 Modification Indices for THETA-EPS IMPULS2 - - IMPULS3 2.187 - - 12

Expected Change for THETA-EPS SELF1 - - SELF2 - - - - SELF3 - - 0.122 - - SELF4-0.017 0.129 0.000 - - SELF5-0.002-0.130 - - -0.021 - - IMPULS1 0.039-0.001 0.058 0.060-0.036 - - IMPULS2 0.001 0.033-0.047-0.051 0.022-8.302 IMPULS3 - - 0.011-0.078-0.072 - - -0.449 Expected Change for THETA-EPS IMPULS2 - - IMPULS3 0.351 - - Completely Standardized Expected Change for THETA-EPS SELF1 - - SELF2 - - - - SELF3 - - 0.073 - - SELF4-0.009 0.071 0.000 - - SELF5-0.001-0.068 - - -0.010 - - IMPULS1 0.035-0.001 0.056 0.053-0.031 - - IMPULS2 0.001 0.042-0.061-0.062 0.025-17.121 IMPULS3 - - 0.007-0.052-0.045 - - -0.472 Completely Standardized Expected Change for THETA-EPS IMPULS2 - - IMPULS3 0.503 - - Modification Indices for THETA-DELTA-EPS DEPRES1 0.695 1.001 0.480 1.541 3.131 0.140 DEPRES2 0.049 0.904 0.009 0.007 2.757 0.012 DEPRES3 0.294 0.133 0.127 0.053 2.464 5.028 DEPRES4 1.087 0.007 0.001 6.886 0.062 0.000 Modification Indices for THETA-DELTA-EPS DEPRES1 1.525 0.028 DEPRES2 3.210 0.335 DEPRES3 1.164 1.609 DEPRES4 0.149 0.299 Expected Change for THETA-DELTA-EPS DEPRES1-0.047-0.051-0.037 0.066 0.095 0.015 DEPRES2-0.015-0.056 0.006-0.005 0.095-0.005 DEPRES3 0.038 0.023-0.022-0.015-0.097-0.110 DEPRES4 0.070 0.005-0.002-0.164 0.015-0.001 Expected Change for THETA-DELTA-EPS DEPRES1-0.036 0.010 DEPRES2 0.061 0.039 13

DEPRES3 0.039 0.091 DEPRES4-0.013 0.038 Completely Standardized Expected Change for THETA-DELTA-EPS DEPRES1-0.025-0.028-0.020 0.034 0.047 0.013 DEPRES2-0.008-0.034 0.004-0.003 0.052-0.005 DEPRES3 0.019 0.012-0.012-0.007-0.046-0.094 DEPRES4 0.036 0.003-0.001-0.083 0.007-0.001 Completely Standardized Expected Change for THETA-DELTA-EPS DEPRES1-0.043 0.006 DEPRES2 0.081 0.026 DEPRES3 0.045 0.054 DEPRES4-0.016 0.023 Modification Indices for THETA-DELTA DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 DEPRES1 - - DEPRES2 4.619 - - DEPRES3 0.209 0.048 - - DEPRES4 - - 0.844 0.579 - - Expected Change for THETA-DELTA DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 DEPRES1 - - DEPRES2-0.162 - - DEPRES3 0.040 0.017 - - DEPRES4 - - 0.073 0.069 - - Completely Standardized Expected Change for THETA-DELTA DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 DEPRES1 - - DEPRES2-0.090 - - DEPRES3 0.020 0.009 - - DEPRES4 - - 0.041 0.034 - - Maximum Modification Index is 6.89 for Element ( 4, 4) of THETA DELTA-EPSILON Covariance Matrix of Parameter Estimates LY 2,1 LY 3,1 LY 4,1 LY 5,1 LY 7,2 LY 8,1 LY 2,1 0.010 LY 3,1 0.005 0.010 LY 4,1 0.007 0.007 0.014 LY 5,1 0.008 0.008 0.011 0.017 LY 7,2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.008 LY 8,1 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.000 0.008 LY 8,2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.005-0.001 LX 1,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LX 2,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LX 3,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LX 4,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 BE 1,2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 GA 1,1-0.005-0.005-0.006-0.008 0.000-0.002 GA 2,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000-0.001-0.001 PS 1,1-0.003-0.003-0.004-0.005 0.000-0.002 PS 2,2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000-0.018 0.000 14

TE 1,1 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.001 TE 2,1 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 TE 2,2-0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 TE 3,1 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.000 0.001 TE 3,3 0.001-0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 TE 4,4 0.000 0.000-0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 TE 5,3 0.000-0.001 0.000-0.001 0.000 0.000 TE 5,5 0.000 0.000 0.000-0.002 0.000 0.000 TE 6,6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.005 0.000 TE 7,7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000-0.003 0.000 TE 8,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 TE 8,5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000-0.001 TE 8,8 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TD 1,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TD 2,2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TD 3,3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TD 4,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TD 4,4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 (deleted section) TD 4,4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 Covariance Matrix of Parameter Estimates TD 2,2 TD 3,3 TD 4,1 TD 4,4 TD 2,2 0.009 TD 3,3 0.001 0.012 TD 4,1-0.001-0.002 0.005 TD 4,4-0.001-0.002 0.003 0.011 Correlation Matrix of Parameter Estimates LY 2,1 LY 3,1 LY 4,1 LY 5,1 LY 7,2 LY 8,1 LY 2,1 1.000 LY 3,1 0.537 1.000 LY 4,1 0.617 0.620 1.000 LY 5,1 0.664 0.627 0.738 1.000 LY 7,2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 LY 8,1 0.308 0.317 0.344 0.366-0.005 1.000 LY 8,2 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.501-0.091 LX 1,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LX 2,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LX 3,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 LX 4,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 BE 1,2-0.036-0.041-0.041-0.045 0.064-0.081 GA 1,1-0.557-0.589-0.620-0.698 0.000-0.313 GA 2,1 0.000 0.001 0.000-0.001-0.078-0.153 PS 1,1-0.554-0.535-0.615-0.640 0.000-0.298 PS 2,2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000-0.799 0.021 TE 1,1 0.111 0.117 0.112 0.144 0.000 0.061 TE 2,1 0.069 0.146 0.102 0.155 0.000 0.063 TE 2,2-0.063 0.060 0.021 0.062 0.000 0.024 TE 3,1 0.183 0.071 0.172 0.169 0.000 0.084 TE 3,3 0.065-0.150 0.062 0.034 0.000 0.026 TE 4,4-0.008 0.040-0.089 0.042 0.000 0.013 TE 5,3 0.023-0.208 0.023-0.113 0.000-0.018 TE 5,5-0.002-0.054 0.001-0.226 0.000-0.037 TE 6,6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.756-0.016 TE 7,7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000-0.738-0.006 15

TE 8,1 0.058 0.061 0.055 0.059 0.000-0.025 TE 8,5 0.007-0.018 0.008-0.055 0.000-0.239 TE 8,8 0.001 0.002 0.001-0.003-0.024-0.048 TD 1,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TD 2,2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TD 3,3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TD 4,1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TD 4,4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 (deleted section) Correlation Matrix of Parameter Estimates TD 2,2 TD 3,3 TD 4,1 TD 4,4 TD 2,2 1.000 TD 3,3 0.063 1.000 TD 4,1-0.184-0.251 1.000 TD 4,4-0.112-0.153 0.347 1.000 Covariances Y - ETA SELFEST 0.863 0.935 0.942 1.033 1.232 0.050 IMPULSE 0.081 0.088 0.089 0.097 0.116 0.579 Y - ETA SELFEST 0.036 0.445 IMPULSE 0.411 0.524 Y - KSI 0.763 0.826 0.833 0.913 1.089 0.041 Y - KSI 0.029 0.391 X - ETA DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 SELFEST 1.022 0.668 0.821 0.930 IMPULSE 0.089 0.058 0.071 0.081 X - KSI DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 1.299 0.848 1.043 1.182 Factor Scores Regressions ETA SELFEST 0.015 0.082 0.168 0.099 0.277-0.008 IMPULSE -0.003-0.005-0.007-0.007-0.001 0.548 ETA DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 16

SELFEST -0.010 0.040 0.069 0.007 0.008 0.042 IMPULSE 0.681 0.158-0.007-0.001-0.001-0.004 KSI 0.002 0.010 0.020 0.012 0.033-0.001 KSI DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4-0.002 0.005 0.400 0.039 0.044 0.241 Standardized Solution LAMBDA-Y SELF1 0.915 - - SELF2 0.991 - - SELF3 0.999 - - SELF4 1.095 - - SELF5 1.306 - - IMPULS1 - - 0.589 IMPULS2 - - 0.419 IMPULS3 0.427 0.495 LAMBDA-X DEPRES1 1.299 DEPRES2 0.848 DEPRES3 1.043 DEPRES4 1.182 BETA SELFEST - - 0.033 IMPULSE - - - - GAMMA SELFEST 0.832 IMPULSE 0.070 Correlation Matrix of ETA and KSI SELFEST 1.000 IMPULSE 0.091 1.000 0.834 0.070 1.000 PSI Note: This matrix is diagonal. 0.304 0.995 Regression Matrix ETA on KSI (Standardized) SELFEST 0.834 IMPULSE 0.070 17

Completely Standardized Solution LAMBDA-Y SELF1 0.666 - - SELF2 0.755 - - SELF3 0.781 - - SELF4 0.793 - - SELF5 0.898 - - IMPULS1 - - 0.724 IMPULS2 - - 0.703 IMPULS3 0.365 0.423 LAMBDA-X DEPRES1 0.924 DEPRES2 0.667 DEPRES3 0.724 DEPRES4 0.830 BETA SELFEST - - 0.033 IMPULSE - - - - GAMMA SELFEST 0.832 IMPULSE 0.070 Correlation Matrix of ETA and KSI SELFEST 1.000 IMPULSE 0.091 1.000 0.834 0.070 1.000 PSI Note: This matrix is diagonal. 0.304 0.995 THETA-EPS SELF1 0.556 SELF2 0.112 0.430 SELF3 0.087 - - 0.390 SELF4 - - - - - - 0.372 SELF5 - - - - -0.088 - - 0.193 IMPULS1 - - - - - - - - - - 0.475 IMPULS2 - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPULS3 0.004 - - - - - - -0.023 - - THETA-EPS IMPULS2 0.506 IMPULS3 - - 0.660 THETA-DELTA DEPRES1 DEPRES2 DEPRES3 DEPRES4 18

DEPRES1 0.147 DEPRES2 - - 0.556 DEPRES3 - - - - 0.476 DEPRES4-0.128 - - - - 0.311 Regression Matrix ETA on KSI (Standardized) SELFEST 0.834 IMPULSE 0.070 Total and Indirect Effects Total Effects of KSI on ETA SELFEST 0.787 (0.087) 9.022 IMPULSE 0.068 (0.086) 0.797 Indirect Effects of KSI on ETA SELFEST 0.002 (0.004) 0.487 IMPULSE - - Total Effects of ETA on ETA SELFEST - - 0.031 (0.053) 0.591 IMPULSE - - - - Largest Eigenvalue of B*B' (Stability Index) is 0.001 Total Effects of ETA on Y SELF1 0.970 0.031 (0.052) 0.591 SELF2 1.050 0.033 (0.098) (0.056) 10.758 0.591 SELF3 1.058 0.033 (0.101) (0.056) 10.524 0.591 SELF4 1.160 0.037 (0.117) (0.062) 9.902 0.591 SELF5 1.385 0.044 (0.130) (0.074) 10.690 0.592 IMPULS1 - - 0.600 IMPULS2 - - 0.427 (0.089) 4.783 IMPULS3 0.453 0.519 (0.090) (0.111) 19

5.056 4.664 Indirect Effects of ETA on Y SELF1 - - 0.031 (0.052) 0.591 SELF2 - - 0.033 (0.056) 0.591 SELF3 - - 0.033 (0.056) 0.591 SELF4 - - 0.037 (0.062) 0.591 SELF5 - - 0.044 (0.074) 0.592 IMPULS1 - - - - IMPULS2 - - - - IMPULS3 - - 0.014 (0.024) 0.593 Total Effects of KSI on Y SELF1 0.763 (0.085) 9.022 SELF2 0.826 (0.080) 10.294 SELF3 0.833 (0.078) 10.611 SELF4 0.913 (0.085) 10.795 SELF5 1.089 (0.088) 12.374 IMPULS1 0.041 (0.051) 0.797 IMPULS2 0.029 (0.037) 0.797 IMPULS3 0.391 (0.076) 5.157 Standardized Total and Indirect Effects Standardized Total Effects of KSI on ETA SELFEST 0.834 IMPULSE 0.070 Standardized Indirect Effects of KSI on ETA 20

SELFEST 0.002 IMPULSE - - Standardized Total Effects of ETA on ETA SELFEST - - 0.033 IMPULSE - - - - Standardized Total Effects of ETA on Y SELF1 0.915 0.030 SELF2 0.991 0.032 SELF3 0.999 0.033 SELF4 1.095 0.036 SELF5 1.306 0.043 IMPULS1 - - 0.589 IMPULS2 - - 0.419 IMPULS3 0.427 0.509 Completely Standardized Total Effects of ETA on Y SELF1 0.666 0.022 SELF2 0.755 0.025 SELF3 0.781 0.026 SELF4 0.793 0.026 SELF5 0.898 0.029 IMPULS1 - - 0.724 IMPULS2 - - 0.703 IMPULS3 0.365 0.435 Standardized Indirect Effects of ETA on Y SELF1 - - 0.030 SELF2 - - 0.032 SELF3 - - 0.033 SELF4 - - 0.036 SELF5 - - 0.043 IMPULS1 - - - - IMPULS2 - - - - IMPULS3 - - 0.014 Completely Standardized Indirect Effects of ETA on Y SELF1 - - 0.022 SELF2 - - 0.025 SELF3 - - 0.026 SELF4 - - 0.026 SELF5 - - 0.029 IMPULS1 - - - - IMPULS2 - - - - IMPULS3 - - 0.012 Standardized Total Effects of KSI on Y SELF1 0.763 SELF2 0.826 SELF3 0.833 SELF4 0.913 SELF5 1.089 21

IMPULS1 0.041 IMPULS2 0.029 IMPULS3 0.391 Completely Standardized Total Effects of KSI on Y SELF1 0.555 SELF2 0.630 SELF3 0.652 SELF4 0.661 SELF5 0.749 IMPULS1 0.050 IMPULS2 0.049 IMPULS3 0.334 Time used: 0.040 Seconds 22