ATAC Trial. 10 year median follow-up data. Approval Code: AZT-ARIM-10005

Similar documents
Choosing between different hormonal therapies. Rudy Van den Broecke UZ Ghent

Scottish Medicines Consortium

William J. Gradishar MD

Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: How Long is Long Enough?

ORMONOTERAPIA ADIUVANTE: QUALE LA DURATA OTTIMALE? MARIANTONIETTA COLOZZA

Extended Hormonal Therapy

Hormone therapy in Breast Cancer patients with comorbidities

Implications of Progesterone Receptor Status for the Biology and Prognosis of Breast Cancers

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study was carried out in Canada.

Emerging Approaches for (Neo)Adjuvant Therapy for ER+ Breast Cancer

Seigo Nakamura,M.D.,Ph.D.

J Clin Oncol 23: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial

OPTIMAL ENDOCRINE THERAPY IN EARLY BREAST CANCER

William J. Gradishar MD

Luminal early breast cancer: (neo-) adjuvant endocrine therapy

Manejo do câncer de mama RH+ na adjuvância: o que há de novo?

Sesiones interhospitalarias de cáncer de mama. Revisión bibliográfica 4º trimestre 2015

Best of San Antonio 2008

Oncotype DX testing in node-positive disease

Objectives Critically review presentations on 1. Local therapy 2. Adjuvant chemotherapy for isolated local regional recurrence 3. The optimal duration

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Overview

Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Pre- and Postmenopausal Patients

Integrated care: guidance on fracture prevention in cancer-associated bone disease; treatment options

BREAST CANCER RISK REDUCTION (PREVENTION)

The worldwide overview: updated (2005-6) meta-analyses of hormonal treatment trials

Radiation and DCIS. The 16 th Annual Conference on A Multidisciplinary Approach to Comprehensive Breast Care and Imaging

Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy

Adjuvant bisphosphonates: our recommendations

Start strong or switch? Adjuvant endocrine strategies for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer

Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Carol Tweed, M.D. Anne Arundel Medical Center DeCesaris Cancer Institute Annapolis, MD

The HERA Study Team. Presented by Ian E. Smith

Hormone therapyduration: Can weselectthosepatientswho benefitfromtreatmentextension?

An updated review on the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapies in hormone receptor positive early breast cancer

Podcast ESMO 2011: The Tamoxifen- Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) Phase III Breast Cancer Trial Results

Adjuvant Systemic Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer

Study Of Letrozole Extension. Coordinating Group IBCSG IBCSG BIG 1-07

R. A. Nout Æ W. E. Fiets Æ H. Struikmans Æ F. R. Rosendaal Æ H. Putter Æ J. W. R. Nortier

Breast Cancer? Breast cancer is the most common. What s New in. Janet s Case

The TAILORx Trial: A review of the data and implications for practice

HORMONAL THERAPY IN ADJUVANT CARE

Oncotype DX tools User Guide

Hormonal therapies for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer

Endocrine Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: Updated Review

Use of Ovarian Suppression and Ablation in Breast Cancer Treatment

BREAST CANCER AND BONE HEALTH

Locoregional treatment Session Oral Abstract Presentation Saulo Brito Silva

Predictors of recurrence in hormone receptor positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy

Intervention(s) Results primary outcome Results secondary and other outcomes

Should premenopausal HR+ve breast cancer receive LHRH?

Hormonal therapies for the adjuvant treatment of early oestrogenreceptor-positive

Systemic Management of Breast Cancer

Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy. Mike Dixon Clinical Director Breakthrough Research Unit Edinburgh

Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy. 10 Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy. Lesson 1

Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Distant Metastasis Following Loco-Regional Recurrence of breast cancer. Cheol Min Kang 2018/04/05

Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Breast Cancer. Joyce O Shaughnessy, MD Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology, PA US Oncology

Delayed adjuvant tamoxifen: Ten-year results of a collaborative randomized controlled trial in early breast cancer (TAM-02 trial)

What is new in HR+ Breast Cancer? Olivia Pagani Breast Unit and Institute of oncology of Southern Switzerland

SYSTEMIC THERAPY OPTIONS FOR BREAST CANCER IN 2014

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Evolving Insights into Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Joyce O Shaughnessy, MD Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology US Oncology

Considerations in Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Joyce O Shaughnessy, MD Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology US Oncology

Metastatic breast cancer: sequence of therapies

SOFTly: The Long Natural History of [Trials for] [premenopausal] ER+ Breast Cancer

The Oncotype DX Assay in the Contemporary Management of Invasive Early-stage Breast Cancer

Bad to the bones: treatments for breast and prostate cancer

Endocrine Therapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer

UK Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Symposium. Should lobular phenotype be considered when deciding treatment? Michael J Kerin

Sustained benefits for women with HER2-positive early breast cancer JORGE MADRID BIG GOCCHI PROTOCOLO HERA

Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Patients

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Chemo-endocrine prevention of breast cancer

Effect of tamoxifen and radiotherapy in women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial

Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Patients

(Neo-) adjuvant endocrine therapy

MP Assays of Genetic Expression in Tumor Tissue as a Technique to Determine Prognosis in Patients With Breast Cancer. Related Policies None

38 years old, premenopausal, had L+snbx. Pathology: IDC Gr.II T-1.9cm N+2/4sn ER+100%st, PR+60%st, Her2-neg, KI %

Page. Objectives: Hormone Therapy Resistance: Challenges and Opportunities. Research Support From Merck

ARIMIDEX 1 mg Tablets ASTRAZENECA

HR [95% CI ]). 95% CI <1 25), 49). A

ESMO Breast Cancer Preceptorship Singapore November Special Issues in Treatment of Young Women with Breast Cancer


Cancer du sein métastatique et amélioration de la survie Pr. X. Pivot

Terapia Hormonal da Paciente Premenopausa

NSABP Pivotal Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: Historical Perspective, Recent Results and Future Directions

Commentary Has tamoxifen had its day? Michael Baum

General Information, efficacy and safety data

Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatment for HER-2+ breast cancer

S u p p o r t e d b y a n i n d e p e n d e n t E d u c a t i o n a l G r a n t f r o m B a y e r

XII Michelangelo Foundation Seminar

Assessment of Risk Recurrence: Adjuvant Online, OncotypeDx & Mammaprint

Breast Cancer Prevention for the Population at Large

INTERGROUP EXEMESTANE STUDY Updated survival analysis

Prosigna BREAST CANCER PROGNOSTIC GENE SIGNATURE ASSAY

Prosigna BREAST CANCER PROGNOSTIC GENE SIGNATURE ASSAY

Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy in Peri- and Postmenopausal. Breast Cancer

Trial: Take-Home Message: Executive Summary: Guidelines:

Selective oestrogen receptor modulators in prevention of breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis of individual participant data

Early Stage Disease. Hope S. Rugo, MD Professor of Medicine Director Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center

Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer: 5-year analysis of the phase III ExteNET trial

Transcription:

ATAC Trial 10 year median follow-up data Approval Code: AZT-ARIM-10005

Background FDA post-approval commitment analysis to update DFS, TTR, OS and Safety Prof. Jack Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group conducted 10 year analysis independently of AZ Analysis presented as poster 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 16-18 th June, 2010

Introduction The primary aim of treatment in early breast cancer (EBC )is preventing recurrence The benefit of tamoxifen on tumour recurrence and mortality is well-established Nevertheless, recurrence rates are >2% per year long term, and >30% of women develop recurrent disease within 15 years 1 Clinical trials have confirmed that AIs reduce recurrence rates further and offer tolerability advantages compared with tamoxifen during adjuvant treatment 2 4 For AIs, several questions remain unanswered including the extent to which treatment benefits continue after completion of therapy AIs, aromatase inhibitors 1 EBCTCG overview. Lancet 2005; 365: 1687-1717 2 ATAC Trialists Group. Lancet 2005; 365: 60-62 3 Coates et al. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 486-92 4 Coombes et al. Lancet 2007; 369: 559-70

ATAC trial design Postmenopausal women with invasive breast cancer (n = 9366) Surgery radiotherapy chemotherapy Randomisation 1:1:1 for 5 years Anastrozole (n = 3125) Tamoxifen (n = 3116) Combination n=3125 ITT population n = 3125 Safety population n = 3092 HR+ subpopulation n = 2618 ITT population n = 3116 Safety population n = 3094 HR+ subpopulation n = 2598 Discontinued following initial analysis as no efficacy or tolerability benefit compared with tamoxifen arm ITT, intent-to-treat; HR+, hormone receptor-positive

ATAC 10 year : Efficacy Update

Efficacy endpoints for HR+ve patients Favors (A) Favors (T) HR P-value Disease-free survival 0.86 0.003 Time to recurrence 0.79 0.0002 Contralateral breast cancer 0.62 0.003 Time to distant recurrence 0.85 0.02 Death after recurrence 0.87 0.09 Death all causes 0.95 0.35 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 2.0 Hazard ratio (A / T) and 95% CI J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Patients (%) DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL (DFS) HR+VE PATIENTS 0 10 20 30 40 50 Tamoxifen (T) Anastrozole (A) 16.5% 13.9% 33.7% 30.2% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Follow-up time (years) At risk: A 2618 T 2598 2541 2516 2452 2398 2362 2304 2279 2195 2163 2086 2028 1896 1934 1796 1728 1542 1650 1453 800 753 Disease recurrence was defined as the earliest of loco-regional or distant recurrence, death or new primary (contralateral) breast cancer. J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Disease Free Survival (DFS) The 10 Year follow-up data on DFS confirms the early and long-term superior efficacy of anastrozole over tamoxifen: for the HR+ population, the absolute benefit of 2.6% at 5 years increasing to 3.5% at 10 years These results confirm the significant carryover effect that was seen in earlier analyses of this study, is maintained at 10 years.

Efficacy Conclusion for DFS Significant advantage for anastrozole compared to tamoxifen is maintained over 10 years, confirming the early and long-term efficacy of anastrozole Significant benefit for the anastrozole group was maintained after treatment completion (HR=0.86 [0.89-0.95], p=0.003) 5. J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010, 16-18 th June.

Patients (%) TIME TO RECURRENCE (TTR) in HR+ patients Disease recurrence was defined as the earliest of loco-regional or distant recurrence, death or new primary (contralateral) breast cancer. 30 25 20 Tamoxifen (T) Anastrozole (A) 24.0% 15 Absolute difference 2.7% 12.5% 19.7% 10 5 9.8% Absolute difference 4.3% 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Follow-up time (years) J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Efficacy Conclusion for TTR The carry-over effect for anastrozole compared with tamoxifen was statistically significant after treatment completion Reduces the risk of recurrence by 21% (HR=0.79 [0.70-0.89] p<0.0002) The absolute difference remained over time (TTR 2.7% at year 5, 4.3% at year 10) J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Patients (%) TIME TO DISTANT RECURRENCE (TTDR) in HR+ patients 30 Disease recurrence was defined as the earliest of loco-regional or distant recurrence, death or new primary (contralateral) breast cancer. 25 20 Tamoxifen (T) Anastrozole (A) 17.7% 15 10 Absolute difference 1.3% 9.2% 15.1% 5 7.9% Absolute difference 2.6% 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Follow-up time (years) At risk: A T 2618 2598 2551 2533 2470 2440 2393 2363 2320 2263 2201 2151 2075 2024 1948 1900 1775 1750 1606 1556 855 821 J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Efficacy conclusions for TTDR* and CLBC + A significant 15% reduction in TTDR was seen for anastrozole when compared with tamoxifen in HR+ve patients (HR=0.85 (0.73-0.98), P=0.02) A significant 38% reduction was seen with anastrozole compared with tamoxifen for contralateral tumours (HR=0.62 (0.45-0.85), P=0.003) The absolute difference for Contralateral Breast Cancer (CLBC) increased from 0.8% at year 5 to 1.7% at year 10 *TTDR and CLBC were additionally analysed independently by Prof Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialist s Group. This is calculation is not reflected in AstraZeneca s Clinical Summary Report +CLBC=Contralateral Breast Cancer J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Death after recurrence The endpoint of death after recurrence* also includes those patients who recurred and then died of other causes. Therefore there is some dilution in assessing the true mortality from breast cancer Results were non-significantly lower in the anastrozole group compared with tamoxifen (HR=0.87 (0.74-1.02), P=0.09) *Previously labelled Breast cancer deaths in previous ATAC reports and elsewhere. This endpoint was additionally analysed independently by J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialist s Group. Death after recurrence was not calculated in AstraZeneca s Clinical Summary Report J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Overall survival There was no difference in overall survival (HR 0.95 [0.84-1.06]; p=0.35 Deaths from other causes formed a component of overall survival Overall survival data indicate that the established survival benefit of tamoxifen is maintained with anastrozole 1 mg J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Summary of efficacy endpoints (A v T) (HR+ve patients) 2004 results (5-year analysis) 2 2007 results 2009 results (100 month FU analysis) 6 (Median 10-year analysis) 5 ENDPOINT HAZARD RATIO (95% CI) P-VALUE HAZARD RATIO (95% CI) P-VALUE HAZARD RATIO (95% CI) P-VALUE DFS 0.83 (0.73-0.94) 0.0049 0.85 (0.76, 0.94) 0.0027 0.86 (0.78-0.95) 0.0027 TTR 0.74 (0.64-0.87) 0.0002 0.76 (0.67, 0.87) 0.0001 0.79 (0.70-0.89) 0.0002 OS 0.97 (0.83-1.14) 0.7339 0.97 (0.86, 1.11) 0.6837 0.95 (0.84-1.06) 0.3468 CLBC 0.47 0.01 0.60 0.004 0.62 0.003* (0.12-0.62) (0.42-0.85) (0.45-0.85) TTDR 0.84 0.06 0.84 0.022 0.85 0.02* (0.70-1.00) (0.72-0.97) (0.73-0.98) Death after recurrence 0.87 (0.74-1.05) 0.2 0.90 (0.75-1.07) 0.2 0.87 (0.74-1.02) 0.09* *Data analysed by J.Cuzick independently of AZ on behalf of the ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group 2. ATAC Trialist s Group Lancet 2005;365:60-62 5. J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010, 16-18 th June. 6. ATAC Trialists Group Lancet Oncol 2008;9:45-53

Summary of efficacy endpoints (HR+ve patients) Previous table illustrates the maintenance of the carry-over effect for anastrozole the statistically significant benefits in DFS,TTR, TTDR and CLBC seen for anastrozole compared with tamoxifen in previous analyses have been maintained at 10 years J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Competing causes of mortality in HR+ve patients A recent study investigated non-breast cancer deaths in women aged 50 with node-negative, oestrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen For at least 10 years after diagnosis, the large majority of deaths were unrelated to breast cancer 7.Hanrahan et al. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4952-60

Competing causes of mortality in HR+ve patients Age 50 years and ER+ Probability 0.4 Breast-cancer deaths Other deaths 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 5 10 15 Time from diagnosis (years) ER+, oestrogen receptor-positive 7. Hanrahan et al. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4952-60

ATAC 10 year: Safety and Tolerability

SAFETY Safety results consistent with previous analyses. Serious adverse events according to treatment group in the safety population J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Fracture Risk Following end of treatment fracture rates were similar in both groups (RR=0.98 (0.81-1.32), p=0.5 J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Conclusions ATAC10 year median follow-up demonstrated that anastrozole is: - significantly superior to tamoxifen at preventing recurrence on treatment and beyond the completion of treatment - significantly superior to tamoxifen at preventing both distant recurrence and contralateral breast cancer J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010, 16-18 th June.

Conclusions The absolute difference in DFS for anastrozole for the HR+ population increased from 2.6% at 5 years to 3.5% at 10 years The absolute difference in TTR for anastrozole for the HR+ population increased from 2.7% at 5 years to 4.3% at 10 years J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Conclusions Anastrozole is generally well-tolerated long term: - No excess fracture rate seen after treatment completion - No new safety concerns were identified Statistically significant evidence for a larger carryover effect with anastrozole compared with tamoxifen confirms efficacy benefits of anastrozole in early and long term treatment beyond 5 years initial therapy anastrozole as initial adjuvant therapy J. Cuzick on behalf of ATAC/LATTE Trialists Group. Poster presented at 12 th Milan Breast Cancer Conference 2010

Thank You!