Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer
Patients Randomized by Country 187 UK n=187 Norway n=425 Finland n=221 Ireland n=17 292 Germany n=292 330 Denmark n=330 Sweden n=401
SEAS Steering Committee Terje R. Pedersen (Chairman), Anne B. Rossebø (Coordinator), Kurt Boman John Chambers Kenneth Egstrup Eva Gerdts Christa Gohlke-Bärwolf Ingar Holme (Statistician) Antero Y. Kesäniemi Christoph Nienaber Simon Ray Terje Skjærpe Kristian Wachtell Ronnie Willenheimer Nonvoting members: Philippe Brudi (MSP), William Malbecq (MSD statistician)
Study Design Randomized Double blind controlled Multicenter 4 Weeks placebo/diet run-in Simvastatin 40 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg or placebo Median duration: 4.5 year (minimum follow-up 4 years)
Primary Endpoint Major Cardiovascular Events: Cardiovascular death Aortic valve replacement surgery (AVR) CHF as a result of progression of AS Non-fatal myocardial infarction CABG PCI Hospitalized unstable angina Non-hemorrhagic stroke PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention CHF= congestive heart failure CABG = coronary-artery bypass grafting
Secondary Endpoints Aortic Valve Events Aortic Valve Replacement CHF as a result of progression of AS Cardiovascular death Ischemic Cardiovascular Events Cardiovascular death Nonfatal MI CABG PCI Hospitalized unstable angina Nonhemorrhagic stroke
Other Objectives Echocardiography Safety
Patient Definition Men and Women Age 45-85 years Asymptomatic Valvular AS: Aortic valve thickening on echocardiographic evaluation Doppler jet velocity 2.5-4.0 m/sec Normal LV systolic function
Exclusion Criteria Statin therapy or indication for statins Coronary heart disease Other important valvular disease Significant mitral valve stenosis or regurgitation Severe or predominant aortic regurgitation Rheumatic valvular disease or AV prosthesis or subvalvular (hypertrophic, obstructive cardiomyopathy) or supravalvular AS Diabetes Mellitus Other conditions precluding participation
Baseline Characteristics Simva + Ezetimibe n= 929 n= 944 Age (years) 67.4 67.7 Women (%) 38.8 38.5 SBP (mm Hg) 144 146 DBP (mm Hg) 82 82 Smoker (%) 18 20 Ex-smoker (%) 37 35 Never smoker (%) 45 45 BMI (kg/m 2) 26.8 26.9
Baseline Medications Simva + Ezetimibe n= 929 n= 944 ACE inhibitors 16.0 14.7 A-II blockers 10.5 10.1 Ca antagonists 17.2 16.6 Beta-blockers 28.8 25.6 Aspirin 28.0 25.0 Diuretics 24.7 22.1
Baseline Lipids and Lipoproteins Fasting Serum Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels at Baseline (n=1,873) Concentration (mmol/l) Concentration (mg/dl) Total Cholesterol 5.74 222 LDL Cholesterol 3.60 139 HDL Cholesterol 1.49 58 Triglycerides 1.42 126 Apolipoprotein B - 1.31 (g/l) Values given as mean ± SD; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; HDL = high-density lipoprotein
Baseline Echocardiography Transaortic Mean Values Simva + Ezetimibe n= 929 n= 944 Peak velocity (m/sec) 3.10 3.09 Peak gradient (mmhg) 39.6 39.3 Mean gradient (mmhg) 23.0 22.7 Aortic valve area (cm 2 ) 1.27 1.29 Bicuspid valve (%) 6.3 5.0
LDL-Cholesterol Intention to Treat Population 150 125 Mean (mg/dl) ±SE 100 75 50 25 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 Year
Primary Endpoint MCE 50 Intention to Treat Population Percentage of Patients With First Event 40 30 20 10 Hazard ratio: 0.96, p=0.591 No. at Risk 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years in Study 906 817 713 618 53 884 791 696 586 56
2nd EP: Aortic Valve Events 50 Intention to Treat Population Percentage of Patients With First Event 40 30 20 10 Hazard ratio: 0.97, p=0.732 No. at Risk 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years in Study 914 836 732 635 55 895 814 725 611 58
Aortic Valve Replacement 50 Intention to Treat Population Percentage of Patients With First Event 40 30 20 10 Hazard ratio: 1.00, p=0.968 0 0 No. at risk 1 2 3 Years in Study 4 5 915 837 734 640 55 896 816 728 618 61
Peak Aortic - Jet Velocity 0.75 Intention to Treat Population 0.60 Change from Baseline (m/sec) Mean (±SE) 0.45 0.30 0.15 EZ/Simva 10/40 mg 0.00 Year 1 Year 2 Last Follow-up Time
2nd EP: Ischemic CV Events 30 Intention to Treat Population Percentage of Patients With First Event 20 10 Hazard ratio: 0.78, p=0.024 No. at risk 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years in Study 917 898 867 838 823 788 769 729 76 76
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) 30 Intention to Treat Population Percentage of Patients With First Event 20 10 Hazard ratio: 0.68, p=0.015 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 No. at risk Years in Study 925 909 887 862 848 819 797 761 80 80
Clinical Adverse Events (AE) All Patients as Treated Population EZ/ Simva N=929 N=943* n n p= Any serious AE (SAE) 463 468 Drug discon. due to SAE 79 77
Clinical Adverse Events (AE) All Patients as Treated Population EZ/ Simva N=929 N=943* n n p= Any serious AE (SAE) 463 468 Drug discon. due to SAE 79 77 Musculoskeletal AE 181 165 0.28 Myopathy / Rhabdo 0 0
Clinical Adverse Events (AE) All Patients as Treated Population EZ/ Simva N=929 N=943* n n p= Any serious AE (SAE) 463 468 Drug discon. due to SAE 79 77 Musculoskeletal AE 181 165 0.28 Myopathy / Rhabdo 0 0 New cancer 65 102 0.01 Recurrent, same site 5 3 Cancer, total 70 105 0.01
Fatal Cancer 20 Intention to Treat Population Cumulative Percentage 15 10 5 0 No. at risk Hazard ratio: 1.67 P=0.05 Unadjusted P=0.06 With Log rank continuity correction 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years in Study 930 916 912 890 884 865 855 835 89 94 n=39 (4.1%) n=23 (2.5%)
Incident Cancer All Patients as Treated Population Site Lip, oral pharynx, Oesophagus Stomach Large bowel / intestine Pancreas Liver gallbladder, bile ducts Lung Other respiratory Skin (any) Breast Prostate Kidney Bladder Genital Hemathological Other/unspecified (N=929) n 1 1 8 1 3 10 0 8 5 13 2 7 4 5 7 EZ/simva (N=943) n 1 5 9 4 2 7 1 18 8 21 2 7 4 7 12 All differences are non-significant
All Cause Mortality 30 Intention to Treat Population Cumulative Percentage 20 10 Hazard ratio: 1.04, p=0.799 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years in Study No. risk 930 916 912 890 884 865 855 835 89 94
Major CV Events - Components Endpoints # of Events EZ/Simva ITT Population Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Major CV Events CV Death AVR CHF Nonfatal MI CABG PCI Hospitalized UAP Non hem. Stroke 355 56 278 23 26 100 17 8 29 333 47 267 25 17 69* 8 5 33 *p=0.02 vs 0.1 1.0 10.0 Favors Favors