Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer

Similar documents
CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Effective Treatment Options With Add-on or Combination Therapy. Christie Ballantyne (USA)

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

Supplement materials:

Lipid Lowering Treatment in Mild to Moderate Aortic Stenosis

Decline in CV-Mortality

CHOLESTEROL-LOWERING THERAPHY

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

Sex differences in cardiovascular outcome during progression of aortic valve stenosis

New evidences in heart failure: the GISSI-HF trial. Aldo P Maggioni, MD ANMCO Research Center Firenze, Italy

Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

Intercommunale de Santé Publique du Pays de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium 2

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Supplementary Online Content

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Fluvastatin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Dyslipidemia

Valvular Heart Disease

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 60 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and warfarin use

In-Ho Chae. Seoul National University College of Medicine

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

Statin therapy in patients with Mild to Moderate Coronary Stenosis by 64-slice Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography

(n=6279). Continuous variables are reported as mean with 95% confidence interval and T1 T2 T3. Number of subjects

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Effects of the Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitor Dalcetrapib in Patients with Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome

Study 2 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Study Top-Line Results. October 29, 2018

The IMPROVE-IT trial (ezetimibe added to simvastatin for acute coronary syndrome). A critical appraisal. abstract

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

Canagliflozin for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the CANVAS Program

Supplementary Online Content

Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or

Alirocumab Treatment Effect Did Not Differ Between Patients With and Without Low HDL-C or High Triglyceride Levels in Phase 3 trials

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

The ACCELERATE Trial

How would you manage Ms. Gold

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

2013 ACC AHA LIPID GUIDELINE JAY S. FONTE, MD

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

Misperceptions still exist that cardiovascular disease is not a real problem for women.

Controversies in Cardiac Pharmacology

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Adult Diabetes Clinician Guide NOVEMBER 2017

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk patients: ODYSSEY LONG TERM

FOURIER: Enough Evidence to Justify Widespread Use? Did It fulfill Its Expectations?

Anne Carol Goldberg, MD, FACP, FAHA, FNLA Washington University, St. Louis, MO USA

J. Michael Gaziano, M.D., M.P.H. European Society of Cardiology August 26 th 2018

Protecting the heart and kidney: implications from the SHARP trial

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

FDA Briefing Document. Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee (EMDAC) December 14, 2015

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Flaws, Bias, Misinterpretation and Fraud in Randomized Clinical Trials

The target blood pressure in patients with diabetes is <130 mm Hg

REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease

ATP IV: Predicting Guideline Updates

CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY OF FEBUXOSTAT OR ALLOPURINOL IN PATIENTS WITH GOUT AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (The CARES Trial)

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

AIM HIGH for SATURN and stay SHARP; COURAGE (v1.5)

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

No relevant financial relationships

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

Methods. Background and Objectives STRADIVARIUS

Disclosure. Financial disclosure: National Advisory Board & Research Grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim

MS Sabatine, RP Giugliano, AC Keech, PS Sever, SA Murphy and TR Pedersen, for the FOURIER Steering Committee & Investigators

1. How does the response to therapy compare in elderly versus middle age adults with diabetes in a randomized trial?

The importance of follow-up after a cardiac event: CARDIAC REHABILITATION. Dr. Guy Letcher

ARIC HEART FAILURE HOSPITAL RECORD ABSTRACTION FORM. General Instructions: ID NUMBER: FORM NAME: H F A DATE: 10/13/2017 VERSION: CONTACT YEAR NUMBER:

ESC Geoffrey Rose Lecture on Population Sciences Cholesterol and risk: past, present and future

Cardiovascular risk reduction in diabetes Lipids (NICE CG181)

LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

Cardiovascular Complications of Diabetes

Vascular Diseases. Overview: Selected Slides

Preventive Cardiology

Supplementary Appendix

GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

Environmental. Vascular / Tissue. Metabolics

The Diabetes Link to Heart Disease

Supplementary Table 1. Baseline Characteristics by Quintiles of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures

Cardiovascular Health Practice Guideline Outpatient Management of Coronary Artery Disease 2003

The Burden of the Diabetic Heart

Case Presentation. Rafael Bitzur The Bert W Strassburger Lipid Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

Is it ever too late for cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation? Prof. Dr. Helmut Gohlke Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen, Germany

Data Analysis Plan for assessing clinical efficacy and safety of ER niacin/laropiprant in the HPS2-THRIVE trial

Is there a mechanism of interaction between hypertension and dyslipidaemia?

CVD Risk Assessment. Lipid Management in Women: Lessons Learned. Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Paris, August 28 th Gian Paolo Ussia on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators

4. Which survey program does your facility use to get your program designated by the state?

Impact of QRS Duration and Morphology on the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in Asymptomatic Patients With Aortic Stenosis

Cardiac catheterisation in AS

Felix Vallotton Ball (1899) LDL-C management in Asian diabetes: moderate vs. high intensity statin --- a lesson from EMPATHY study

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

TICAGRELOR VERSUS CLOPIDOGREL AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ST- ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Transcription:

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer

Patients Randomized by Country 187 UK n=187 Norway n=425 Finland n=221 Ireland n=17 292 Germany n=292 330 Denmark n=330 Sweden n=401

SEAS Steering Committee Terje R. Pedersen (Chairman), Anne B. Rossebø (Coordinator), Kurt Boman John Chambers Kenneth Egstrup Eva Gerdts Christa Gohlke-Bärwolf Ingar Holme (Statistician) Antero Y. Kesäniemi Christoph Nienaber Simon Ray Terje Skjærpe Kristian Wachtell Ronnie Willenheimer Nonvoting members: Philippe Brudi (MSP), William Malbecq (MSD statistician)

Study Design Randomized Double blind controlled Multicenter 4 Weeks placebo/diet run-in Simvastatin 40 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg or placebo Median duration: 4.5 year (minimum follow-up 4 years)

Primary Endpoint Major Cardiovascular Events: Cardiovascular death Aortic valve replacement surgery (AVR) CHF as a result of progression of AS Non-fatal myocardial infarction CABG PCI Hospitalized unstable angina Non-hemorrhagic stroke PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention CHF= congestive heart failure CABG = coronary-artery bypass grafting

Secondary Endpoints Aortic Valve Events Aortic Valve Replacement CHF as a result of progression of AS Cardiovascular death Ischemic Cardiovascular Events Cardiovascular death Nonfatal MI CABG PCI Hospitalized unstable angina Nonhemorrhagic stroke

Other Objectives Echocardiography Safety

Patient Definition Men and Women Age 45-85 years Asymptomatic Valvular AS: Aortic valve thickening on echocardiographic evaluation Doppler jet velocity 2.5-4.0 m/sec Normal LV systolic function

Exclusion Criteria Statin therapy or indication for statins Coronary heart disease Other important valvular disease Significant mitral valve stenosis or regurgitation Severe or predominant aortic regurgitation Rheumatic valvular disease or AV prosthesis or subvalvular (hypertrophic, obstructive cardiomyopathy) or supravalvular AS Diabetes Mellitus Other conditions precluding participation

Baseline Characteristics Simva + Ezetimibe n= 929 n= 944 Age (years) 67.4 67.7 Women (%) 38.8 38.5 SBP (mm Hg) 144 146 DBP (mm Hg) 82 82 Smoker (%) 18 20 Ex-smoker (%) 37 35 Never smoker (%) 45 45 BMI (kg/m 2) 26.8 26.9

Baseline Medications Simva + Ezetimibe n= 929 n= 944 ACE inhibitors 16.0 14.7 A-II blockers 10.5 10.1 Ca antagonists 17.2 16.6 Beta-blockers 28.8 25.6 Aspirin 28.0 25.0 Diuretics 24.7 22.1

Baseline Lipids and Lipoproteins Fasting Serum Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels at Baseline (n=1,873) Concentration (mmol/l) Concentration (mg/dl) Total Cholesterol 5.74 222 LDL Cholesterol 3.60 139 HDL Cholesterol 1.49 58 Triglycerides 1.42 126 Apolipoprotein B - 1.31 (g/l) Values given as mean ± SD; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; HDL = high-density lipoprotein

Baseline Echocardiography Transaortic Mean Values Simva + Ezetimibe n= 929 n= 944 Peak velocity (m/sec) 3.10 3.09 Peak gradient (mmhg) 39.6 39.3 Mean gradient (mmhg) 23.0 22.7 Aortic valve area (cm 2 ) 1.27 1.29 Bicuspid valve (%) 6.3 5.0

LDL-Cholesterol Intention to Treat Population 150 125 Mean (mg/dl) ±SE 100 75 50 25 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 Year

Primary Endpoint MCE 50 Intention to Treat Population Percentage of Patients With First Event 40 30 20 10 Hazard ratio: 0.96, p=0.591 No. at Risk 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years in Study 906 817 713 618 53 884 791 696 586 56

2nd EP: Aortic Valve Events 50 Intention to Treat Population Percentage of Patients With First Event 40 30 20 10 Hazard ratio: 0.97, p=0.732 No. at Risk 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years in Study 914 836 732 635 55 895 814 725 611 58

Aortic Valve Replacement 50 Intention to Treat Population Percentage of Patients With First Event 40 30 20 10 Hazard ratio: 1.00, p=0.968 0 0 No. at risk 1 2 3 Years in Study 4 5 915 837 734 640 55 896 816 728 618 61

Peak Aortic - Jet Velocity 0.75 Intention to Treat Population 0.60 Change from Baseline (m/sec) Mean (±SE) 0.45 0.30 0.15 EZ/Simva 10/40 mg 0.00 Year 1 Year 2 Last Follow-up Time

2nd EP: Ischemic CV Events 30 Intention to Treat Population Percentage of Patients With First Event 20 10 Hazard ratio: 0.78, p=0.024 No. at risk 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years in Study 917 898 867 838 823 788 769 729 76 76

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) 30 Intention to Treat Population Percentage of Patients With First Event 20 10 Hazard ratio: 0.68, p=0.015 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 No. at risk Years in Study 925 909 887 862 848 819 797 761 80 80

Clinical Adverse Events (AE) All Patients as Treated Population EZ/ Simva N=929 N=943* n n p= Any serious AE (SAE) 463 468 Drug discon. due to SAE 79 77

Clinical Adverse Events (AE) All Patients as Treated Population EZ/ Simva N=929 N=943* n n p= Any serious AE (SAE) 463 468 Drug discon. due to SAE 79 77 Musculoskeletal AE 181 165 0.28 Myopathy / Rhabdo 0 0

Clinical Adverse Events (AE) All Patients as Treated Population EZ/ Simva N=929 N=943* n n p= Any serious AE (SAE) 463 468 Drug discon. due to SAE 79 77 Musculoskeletal AE 181 165 0.28 Myopathy / Rhabdo 0 0 New cancer 65 102 0.01 Recurrent, same site 5 3 Cancer, total 70 105 0.01

Fatal Cancer 20 Intention to Treat Population Cumulative Percentage 15 10 5 0 No. at risk Hazard ratio: 1.67 P=0.05 Unadjusted P=0.06 With Log rank continuity correction 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years in Study 930 916 912 890 884 865 855 835 89 94 n=39 (4.1%) n=23 (2.5%)

Incident Cancer All Patients as Treated Population Site Lip, oral pharynx, Oesophagus Stomach Large bowel / intestine Pancreas Liver gallbladder, bile ducts Lung Other respiratory Skin (any) Breast Prostate Kidney Bladder Genital Hemathological Other/unspecified (N=929) n 1 1 8 1 3 10 0 8 5 13 2 7 4 5 7 EZ/simva (N=943) n 1 5 9 4 2 7 1 18 8 21 2 7 4 7 12 All differences are non-significant

All Cause Mortality 30 Intention to Treat Population Cumulative Percentage 20 10 Hazard ratio: 1.04, p=0.799 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years in Study No. risk 930 916 912 890 884 865 855 835 89 94

Major CV Events - Components Endpoints # of Events EZ/Simva ITT Population Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Major CV Events CV Death AVR CHF Nonfatal MI CABG PCI Hospitalized UAP Non hem. Stroke 355 56 278 23 26 100 17 8 29 333 47 267 25 17 69* 8 5 33 *p=0.02 vs 0.1 1.0 10.0 Favors Favors