Abd El-Rahman, H.H; Y.A. A. El-Nomeary; A. A. Abedo; Fatma M. Salman and M. I. Mohamed

Similar documents
Key words: Replacement; Yellow corn; Cull dates; Energy; Productive performance and Goats kid

What is ProPound Canola Meal?

Effect of PHYTASE 5000 (Granular) on the Performance and Nutrient Digestibility of Growing Finishing Pigs

What is ProPound Canola Meal?

VARIATION IN CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SOYBEAN HULLS 1. F. F. Barbosa, M. D. Tokach, J. M. DeRouchey, R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, and S. S.

USE OF DDGS AS A FEED INGREDIENT ETHANOL AND DDGS OVERVIEW AN EVOLVING ETHANOL INDUSTRY

Use of Deoiled DDGS in Poultry. S. L. Noll, Ph.D. Professor and Poultry Extension Specialist

R. O. Gottlob, J. M. DeRouchey, M. D. Tokach, R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, S. S. Dritz 2, C. W. Hastad, K. R. Lawrence, and D. A.

Feeding Value of DDGS for Swine, Dairy, and Beef. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

A COMPARISON OF WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE AND SPRAY-DRIED ANIMAL PLASMA IN DIETS FOR WEANLING PIGS 1

Dietary Amino Acid Responses of Layers. W. A. Dozier, III Associate Professor Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University Auburn, AL, USA

ENERGY AND NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY IN DISTILLERS DRIED GRAIN WITH SOLUBLES FED TO GROWING PIGS

Variation in chemical composition of soybean hulls

RESEARCH OPINIONS IN ANIMAL & VETERINARY SCIENCES

The Real Value of Canola Meal

EFFECTS OF AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTIONS FOR WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE ON WEANLING PIG PERFORMANCE. Authors: J. Chung, S.D. Carter and J.C.

Overview of Completed DDGS Swine Research

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames. 4

Maximizing Milk Components and Metabolizable Protein Utilization through Amino Acid Formulation

What are the 6 Nutrients. Carbohydrates Proteins Fats/Oils (Lipids) Vitamins Minerals Water

EFFECTS OF PEPSOYGEN AND DRIED PORCINE SOLUBLES 50 IN NURSERY PIG DIETS 1

Evaluation of Ruma Pro (a calcium-urea product) on microbial yield and efficiency in continuous culture

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

Sustainable Fish Diets for the 21st Century using Soybean Protein. Paul B. Brown, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA

Prospects of Palm Kernel Cake. use in Cattle Feed

Lamb Weaning and Nutrition

What We ve Learned About Feeding Reduced-Oil DDGS to Pigs

August 22, 2017 M. D. Lindemann

DDGS: An Evolving Commodity. Dr. Jerry Shurson University of Minnesota

EFFECTS OF REPLACING WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE WITH CRYSTALLINE AMINO ACIDS ON WEANLING PIG PERFORMANCE

Evaluation of Chinese Brown Rice as an Alternative Energy Source in Pig Diets**

Heidi Rossow, PhD UC Davis School Of Veterinary Medicine, VMTRC Tulare, CA. Interpreting Forage Quality from the Cows Perspective

Lambs & Fieldpeas Sheep Day Report. Field Pea as a feedstuff for growing lambs. Introduction

Metabolism of Amino Acids in Aquatic Animals II

ESTIMATING THE ENERGY VALUE OF CORN SILAGE AND OTHER FORAGES. P.H. Robinson 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

ssniff Complete feeds for rabbits and guinea pigs *

Amino Acid Digestibility and Energy Concentration of Fermented Soybean Meal and Camelina Meal for Swine 1

Effects of Increasing Wheat Middlings and Net Energy Formulation on Nursery Pig Growth Performance

Goals. Goals. Maintenance Rations 4/25/2014. Week 4 Lecture 12. Clair Thunes, PhD

Soybean Use Poultry FACT SHEET MEAL

Response of Growing Calves Fed graded Levels of Farm Kernel Meal as Nitrogen Source. By: *Gidado, A. S., **Nasiru M. and **Haruna, U.

Corn By-Product Diversity and Feeding Value to Non-Ruminants

METABOLISM AND NUTRITION. Glandless Cottonseed Meal for Laying and Breeding Hens and Broiler Chicks

Energy and Nitrogen Balance of Pigs Fed Four Corn Grains

P. Namanee, S. Kuprasert and W. Ngampongsai. Abstract

COMPARISON OF INTERNATIONAL PROTEIN CORPORATION 740 FISH MEAL AND SPECIAL SELECT MENHADEN FISH MEAL IN NURSERY PIG DIETS

DIET DIGESTIBILITY AND RUMEN TRAITS IN RESPONSE TO FEEDING WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND A PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

Opportunities for Using DDGS in Livestock and Poultry Feeds in Canada. Dr. Jerry Shurson Dept. of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Productive And Reproductive Performance Of Friesian Cows Under Different Feeding System

Summary. Procedures. (Key Words: Sorghum, Distillers Grains, Waxy, Endosperm, Finishing Pigs.) Introduction

Making Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay

Recent Developments in Net Energy Research for Pigs

Feed ID Options /10/2016. DM% CP% TDN% Fat% Ca% P%

PRO G max Probiotic fermented soybean meal Benefits of PRO G max

Effect of Feeding Dried Distiller s Grains Plus Solubles on Milk Yield and its Composition in Dairy Cattle

Feed and Alternative Uses for DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson and Dr. Sally Noll Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Table 2. Effects of supplemental nitrogen on the growth of steers that consumed a diet based on corn silage and cottonseed hulls. P-Value (P<) Item d

Effects of feeding different levels of sesame oil cake on performance and digestibility of Awassi lambs

Effective Practices In Sheep Production Series

Feeding DDGS to Livestock and Poultry. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Effect Of Dietary Incorporation Of Ksheerabala Residue On Dry Matter Intake And Nutrient Digestibility In Crossbred Calves

CERTAIN OBSERVATIONS ON NUTRITIVE VALUE OF PALM KERNEL MEAL IN COMPARISON TO DEOILED RICE BRAN

Effect Of Partial Replacement Of Berseem Hay By Ensiled And Dried Sugar Beet Tops On Performance Of Growing Rabbits

Composition and Nutritive Value of Corn Fractions and Ethanol Co-products Resulting from a New Dry-milling Process 1

Exercise 6 Ration Formulation II Balance for Three or More Nutrients 20 Points

Whey-Grown Yeast as a Protein Source for Baby Pigs

Nutrient digestibility in canola meal for broilers: Effects of oil extraction method and fractionation by air classification

Introduction. Carbohydrate Nutrition. Microbial CHO Metabolism. Microbial CHO Metabolism. CHO Fractions. Fiber CHO (FC)

Nutritive Value of Feeds

Proteins and Amino Acids. Benjamin Caballero, MD, PhD Johns Hopkins University

Development and Evaluation of a New Precision-Fed Chick Assay for Determining Amino Acid Digestibility and Metabolizable Energy of Feed Ingredients

Overview of Production and Nutrient Content of DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

COURSE TITLE: Animal Production. SECTION: Principles of Animal Nutrition COURSE CODE: VETM1111

DAIRY FOCUS AT ILLINOIS NEWSLETTER. Focus on Forages Volume 2, Number 1

Dietary Protein. Dr. Mark McGuire Dr. Jullie Wittman AVS Department University of Idaho

Evaluation of the potential connection between Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles and manure pit foaming in commercial pork production systems

DETERMINING THE THREONINE REQUIREMENT OF THE LACTATING SOW 1

COW SUPPLEMENTATION: GETTING THE BEST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK. Low Quality Forage. Ruminant Digestive Anatomy. How do we get the best bang for the buck?

COMPLETE LACTATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF COWS FED WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

), 15 (T 4. compared to other treatment groups. The overall mean per cent broken eggs was significantly (P<0.05) high in T 4

Exercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points

Energy 01/02/2013. Jean NOBLET INRA 30/01/ Méthodes de prévision des valeurs nutritives des aliments pour le porc: contexte international

A Comparison of MIN-AD to MgO and Limestone in Peripartum Nutrition

NEW TRIAL PERFORMANCE ON COLOR CHICKENS AND GUT HEALTH SITUATION

RFV VS. RFQ WHICH IS BETTER

Fundamentals of Ration Balancing for Beef Cattle Part II: Nutrient Terminology

Implementation of a net energy formulation system for laying hen feed

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAMS FEED

Production Costs. Learning Objectives. Essential Nutrients. The Marvels of Ruminant Digestion

Overview of Production, Nutrient Profile, Physical Characteristics, and Quality Assessment of New Generation DDGS

Effect of Diet-protein Source on Lamb Fattening

PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTATION: DAILY, ONCE EVERY 5 DAYS, OR ONCE EVERY 10 DAYS

Amino Acid, Carbohydrate, and Fat Composition of Soybean Meals Prepared at 55 Commercial U.S. Soybean Processing Plants

Nutritive Value of Canola Meal: The Dietary Fibre Story

New Technologies to Aid in Evaluation of Alternative Feedstuffs. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Sunflower protein concentrate

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTING PRAIRIE HAY WITH TWO LEVELS OF CORN AND FOUR LEVELS OF DEGRADABLE INTAKE PROTEIN. II. RUMINAL PARAMETERS OF STEERS.

Quick Start. Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for Sheep

Amino acid digestibility and energy concentration of fermented soybean meal and camelina meal for swine

Soy Protein. Muscle health benefits: for Sports Nutrition Recovery and during aging. May 9, Mark Cope, PhD

Transcription:

Abd El-Rahman, H.H; Y.A. A. El-Nomeary; A. A. Abedo; Fatma M. Salman and M. I. Mohamed

Presented by: Yasser Ahmed Abd El-Fattah El-Nomeary Animal Production Department, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Protein and energy are the two major components of feed that influence performance of the growing and fattening lambs. Protein is one of the critical nutrients for young growing and fattening animals. Being more expensive than the other nutrients, optimal use of protein is necessary. Provision of the quality of protein in the lambs diets does not only improve the animal performance but also ensures profitable animal production.

Protein sources differ in their chemistry as far as amino acid profile and availability of CP in rumen and post ruminal level. Different protein sources have varying effect on ruminant s performance and their serum biochemistry. This varied response in performance may be due to changes in rumen ecology and their different amino acid profiles.

Different protein sources in lamb diets like soybean meal (SBM), black seed meal (BSM), cotton seed meal (CSM) and sesame seed meal (SSM) provide the condensed nutrients that may be efficiently utilized at ruminal level. Protein source with a higher by-pass value have been reported to have more intense effects on N-balance, growth and muscle mass accretion than those which are lower in by-pass protein. Inclusion of protein sources with amino acid profiles matching closely to the amino acid needs of the growing lambs results in better growth performance and nitrogen utilization by the animal.

Protein sources soybean meal (SBM), cotton seed meal (CSM) Protein sources black seed meal (BSM), sesame seed meal (SSM)

Objective

The present study aimed to investigate the benefit from the residues after oils extraction (BSM, CSM and SSM) as substitutes for soybean meal in animal feeds. The effect of including these protein sources in the ration on nutrients digestibility, feeding value, nitrogen utilization, live body weight, some ruminal parameters and economical efficiency of Farafra sheep was studied. Amino acids assay and the solubility of the different tested protein sources were also done.

Materials and Methods This study was carried out at the Animal Production Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

Feeding trial

Twenty fattening mature male Farafra sheep averaged 43.50± kg live body weight ; 9 months old were divided into four groups (5 animals in each) according to LBW in fattening trial for 66 days. Animals were fed the experimental concentrate feed mixtures (CFM) at 3% of LBW, animals were offered wheat straw ad-lib.. Black seed meal (BSM), cotton seed meal (CSM) and sesame seed meal (SSM) were incorporated into of the experimental concentrate feed mixtures (CFM) to replace 100% of the soybean meal (SBM) as a different sources of protein.

Treatments Soybean meal (SBM) Black seed meal (BSM) Cotton seed meal (CSM) Sesame seed meal (SSM)

At the end of feeding trial, twelve animals were used in digestion trials (3 for each group) for 21 days, 14 days at preliminary period and 7 days as collection period.

Proximate chemical analysis Cell wall constituents Nitrogen fractions Soluble and insoluble protein Amino acids assay Digestibility and nitrogen balance Average daily gain Water intake Ruminal parameters Feed intake and feed conversion Economic evaluation

Results

Item Protein sources, meal Soybean meal Black seeds meal Cotton seeds meal Sesame seeds meal Moisture : 10.15 8.63 9.62 8.92 Component, % on DM basis OM 92.55 92.47 94.49 91.86 CP 44.50 30.09 26.24 30.66 CF 7.33 10.21 29.92 9.60 EE 5.01 21.08 8.39 15.90 NFE 35.71 31.09 29.94 35.70 Cell wall constituents,% NDF 33.74 35.63 48.58 35.23 ADF 16.12 18.74 36.72 18.19 Gross energy, Kcal/kg DM 4771 5396 4756 5107

Item Protein sources, meal Soybean meal Black seeds meal Cotton seeds meal Sesame seeds meal Protein fraction: Total protein True protein, g True protein, g % of total protein NPN, g NPN, g% of total nitrogen 44.50 39.44 88.63 5.06 11.37 30.06 25.37 84.40 4.69 15.60 26.24 23.12 88.11 3.12 11.90 30.69 23.13 75.37 7.56 24.63 Protein solubility: Insoluble protein, g Insoluble protein % of total protein Soluble protein, g Soluble protein %of total protein 41.88 94.11 2.62 5.89 15.75 52.40 14.31 47.60 22.81 86.93 3.43 13.07 24.25 79.02 6.44 20.98

IAmino acids Protein sources, meal Soybean meal Black seeds meal Cotton seeds meal Sesame seeds meal Essential amino acids: Thereonine Valine Methionine 1.814 2.588 0.683 1.45 0.04 0.55 1.073 1.627 0.235 1.160 1.407 0.384 Isoleucine Leucine 2.052 5.880 1.42 2.44 1.016 3.006 4.412 4.235 Phenylalanine Histidine Lysine Arginine Proline Non essential amino acids: Aspartic acid Serine 5.419 2.319 4.450 2.856 1.799 4.826 2.701 1.69 1.42 1.48 3.24 1.359 2.97 1.35 2.973 1.253 2.181 1.754 1.107 2.621 1.466 2.713 0.827 1.509 5.481 1.251 3.335 1.883 Glutamic acid 11.792 6.22 6.683 10.842 Glycine 0.943 1.28 0.716 2.582 Alanine Cystin Tyrosine 4.014 1.6 2.752 1.74 5.28 1.69 2.879 1.5 1.103 3.511 2.1 1.164

Item Protein sources, meal Soybean meal Black seeds meal Cotton seeds meal Sesame seeds meal Formulation : Yellow corn Soybean meal Cumin seeds Cotton seeds Sesame meal Wheat bran Limestone Common salt Total Moisture Organic matter (OM) Crude protein (CP) Crude fiber (CF) Ether extract (EE) Nitrogen free extract (NFE) Ash NDF ADF Gross energy k, cal/kg DM* 50 16 - - - 31 2 1 100 10.00 94.89 14.03 10.40 3.11 67.35 5.11 35.76 18.92 4312 50-23 - - 24 2 1 100 Chemical composition: 9.77 Component, % on DM basis 95.23 13.99 11.30 6.84 63.10 4.77 Cell wall constituents,% 36.35 19.74 4521 50 - - 28-19 2 1 100 10.29 93.89 14.06 12.84 4.61 62.38 6.11 37.36 21.14 4349 50 - - - 21.5 25.5 2 1 100 9.26 93.16 14.10 11.20 5.66 62.20 6.84 36.28 19.65 4375

Item Protein sources, meal Soybean meal Black seeds meal Cotton seeds meal Sesame seeds meal Protein fraction: Total protein True protein, g True protein, g % of total protein NPN, g 14.03 13.63 97.15 0.40 13.99 13.56 96.93 0.43 14.06 13.13 93.39 0.93 14.10 12.31 87.30 1.79 NPN, g% of total nitrogen 2.85 3.07 6.61 12.70 Protein solubility: Insoluble protein, g Insoluble protein % of total protein Soluble protein, g Soluble protein %of total protein 13.94 99.36 0.09 0.64 8.44 60.33 5.55 39.67 12.69 90.26 1.37 9.74 10.94 77.59 3.16 22.41

Item Experimental rations (%) on DM basis Soybean meal Black seeds meal Cotton seeds meal Sesame seeds meal Sig. No. of animals Av. body weight, kg 3 58.17 3 52.17 3 51.58 3 54.00 DM intake, g/h/days Total 1070.08 1084.85 1137.00 1154.17 NS DM intake, g/ kg B W 0.75 : Total 18.49 21.02 22.29 Nutrients digestibility, % : 21.40 NS DM OM CP CF EE NFE Feeding value, % 69.18 A 72.20 A 66.20 B 54.14 A 51.90 C 80.89 62.14 B 64.85 A 59.28 C 49.46 B 61.84 B 79.42 70.58 A 75.05 A 77.24 A 56.82 A 70.18 A 83.47 71.49 A 74.12 A 71.09 AB 48.73 B 56.37 BC 83.36 * * * * NS TDN 69.27 65.82 73.51 71.91 NS DCP 8.05 B 7.58 B 9.67 A 8.93 AB *

Item Experimental rations (%) on DM basis Soybean meal Black seeds meal Cotton seeds meal Sesame seeds meal Sig. Nitrogen balance, g/h/d: Nitrogen intake 20.80 22.19 22.70 23.08 NS Fecal nitrogen Urinary nitrogen Digestible nitrogen N retention 7.01 B 12.32 A 13.79 C 1.47 C 9.02 A 9.31 B 13.17 C 3.86 BC 5.19 C 5.46 C 17.51 A 12.05 A 6.69 B 10.37 B 16.39 B 6.02 B * * N retention/ N intake,% 7.07 C 17.40 B 53.08 A 26.08 B N retention/ N digestible,% 10.66 C 29.31 B 68.82 A 36.73 B

Item Experimental rations (%) on DM basis Soybean meal Cumin seeds meal Cotton seeds meal Sesame seeds meal Sig. Water balance, ml/h/d Drinking water Feed water Urinary water Fecal water 6604.33 118.33 1074.67 A 413.00 A 6125.00 117.33 583.33 C 342.00 B 6550.00 129.33 475.00 C 158.33 C 6900.00 119.33 750.00 B 200.67 B C NS NS * * Water balance 5234.99 5317.00 6046.00 6068.66 NS Water balance, ml /kg BW 0.75 Urinary water 18.87 A 11.30 AB 9.30 B 13.90 AB * Fecal water 7.03 A 6.60 AB 3.03 B 3.70 B Water balance 90.34 102.13 118.47 112.50 NS Drinking water, L/Kg DM intake 6.17 5.65 5.76 5.98 NS

Item Experimental rations (%) on DM basis 0 hr 3 hrs. 6 hrs. Mean 0 hr 3 hrs. Soybean meal 6.60 6.10 6.40 6.36 A 14.00 25.70 Black seeds meal 6.67 6.27 6.47 6.47 A Cotton seeds meal PH 6.70 6.20 6.40 6.43 A Ammonia-NH 3 N (mg/100ml) 16.67 36.67 11.00 23.53 Sesame seeds meal 6.17 5.77 5.83 5.92 B 15.77 35.26 Mean 6.54 A 6.09 B 6.28 B 14.36 C 30.29 A Sig. 6 hrs. 19.33 23.76 23.00 23.00 22.27 B Mean 19.68 B 25.70 A 19.18 B 24.68 A 0hr 13.00 TVFA s (meq/100 ml) 8.73 10.07 9.73 10.38 C 3 hrs. 6 hrs. Mean 45.33 22.53 26.95 A 29.00 20.13 19.29 B 31.33 21.10 20.83 B 30.67 20.40 20.27 B 34.08 A 21.04 B *

Item Experimental rations (%) on DM basis Net 1 Soybean meal Black seeds meal Cotton seeds meal Sesame seeds meal Sig. No. of animals Feeding period, day Initial body weight, Kg Final body weight, kg Body weight gain, g/period Average daily weight gain, g/h 5 66 43.50 55.40 11.90 B 180.30 C 5 66 41.50 55.40 13.90 B 210.61 B 5 66 41.50 57.00 15.50 A 234.85 A 5 66 39.00 52.60 13.60 B 206.06 B NS NS * * Feed intake, g DM/h/day: Total DM intake g/h/day Feed conversion ratio, kg feed/kg gain Economic evaluation: Income of gain /L.E./h Feed cost/ L.E./h Net feed revenue /L.E/h 1343.57 7.54 380.80 195.10 185.70 1404.85 6.76 444.80 203.98 240.82 1458.20 6.21 496.00 211.55 284.45 1466.16 7.12 435.20 212.92 222.28 NS NS Economic feed efficiency, 100% Relative efficiency,100% 95.20 100 118.10 124.00 134.50 141.0 104.40 110.00

Conclusion From this study it could be concluded that : Cotton seed meal is the best protein source for lambs as compared to other sources of protein ( SBM, BSM and SSM). It had better nutrients digestibility, nitrogen balance, daily gain, feed efficiency and economic feed efficiency followed by BSM and SSM which had nearly similar values. While, the lowest values were obtained with SBM. However, SBM can provide for monogastric animals and poultry feeding. Future studies are needed to investigate the effect of different combinations from these meals to identify the best results.