The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

Similar documents
The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

Can IVUS Define Plaque Features that Impact Patient Care?

Assessment of Vulnerable Plaque by IVUS and VH-IVUS

Imaging Overview for Vulnerable Plaque: Data from IVUS Trial and An Introduction to VH-IVUS Imgaging

Invasive Evaluation of High Risk or Vulnerable Plaque A Powerful Tool to Address Potential Pharmacological Agents? Jagat Narula, MD PhD MACC

Imaging Atheroma The quest for the Vulnerable Plaque

Optical Coherence Tomography for Intracoronary Imaging

OCT Findings: Lesson from Stable vs Unstable Plaques

OCT; Comparative Imaging Results with IVUS, VH and Angioscopy

Culprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Plaque Characteristics in Coronary Artery Disease. Chourmouzios Arampatzis MD, PhD, FESC

Invasive Coronary Imaging Modalities for Vulnerable Plaque Detection

Intervention: How and to which extent is technology helping us?

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

Adverse Cardiovascular Events Arising From Atherosclerotic Lesions With and Without Angiographic Disease Progression

Added Value of Invasive Coronary Imaging for Plaque Rupture and Erosion

Gary S. Mintz,, MD. IVUS Observations in Acute (vs Chronic) Coronary Artery Disease: Structure vs Function

Usefulness of OCT during coronary intervention

Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes

71 CONGRESSO NAZIONALE FIMMG METIS Domus de Maria, 9 ottobre 2015

1st Department of Cardiology, University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece

The Future of intravascular Is there light or sound at the end of the tunnel? Hybrid Imaging

Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR for LM Stenting

Between Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve

Innate Immunity in Atherosclerosis

Coronary Artery Thermography

Machine Learning in Precision Medicine Coronary Health Prediction - Cardiac Events (Atherosclerosis) - Heart Transplant (Vasculopathy)

Stephen G. Ellis, M.D. Professor of Medicine Director Invasive Services Co-Director Cardiac Gene Bank

eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

대한심장학회춘계학술대회 Satellite Symposium

Integrating IVUS, FFR, and Noninvasive Imaging to Optimize Outcomes. Gary S. Mintz, MD Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Cindy L. Grines MD FACC FSCAI

Assessment of plaque morphology by OCT in patients with ACS

actually rupture! Challenges to the vulnerable plaque concept

Can We Identify Vulnerable Patients & Vulnerable Plaque?

Malaysian Healthy Ageing Society

Inspiron Stent. Clinical Research Program. Pedro A. Lemos MD PhD. Heart Institute InCor University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting

Quinn Capers, IV, MD

OCT guidance for distal LM lesions

Quick guide. Core. precision guided therapy system

Mid-term results from real-world REPARA registry. Felipe Hernandez, on behalf of the REPARA investigators

IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. K.Boerlage-van Dijk CarVasZ 2014

Left Main Intervention: Where are we in 2015?

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Count Down to COMBAT

Failure of positive. Recanalization and CTO formation. TCFA rupture with (fatal) thrombotic occlusion. TCFA Lipid pool

Bifurcation Stenting: IVUS and OCT Information

Multimodality Imaging in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in the Peripartum Period

COURAGE to Leave Diseased Arteries Alone

CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE

Dynamic Nature of Nonculprit Coronary Artery Lesion Morphology in STEMI

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

Defining Plaque Composition by CTA: The Latest Tool to Monitor Therapy?

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY. Konstantina P. Bouki, FESC 2 nd Department of Cardiology General Hospital Of Nikea, Pireaus

New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA

Pathology of Vulnerable Plaque Angioplasty Summit 2005 TCT Asia Pacific, Seoul, April 28-30, 2005

Update from the Tryton IDE study

Causes of death in Diabetes

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

Bernard Chevalier Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France. Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Netherlands

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary lesions: Can You Handle the Pressure? Jeffrey A Southard, MD May 4, 2013

Post PCI functional testing and imaging: case based lessons from FFR React

Nobori Clinical Studies Up-dates. Gian Battista DANZI, M.D. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Italy

Assessment of vulnerable plaque by OCT

2yrs 2-6yrs >6yrs BMS 0% 22% 42% DES 29% 41% Nakazawa et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

as a Mechanism of Stent Failure

Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, On the behalf of SMART-DATE trial investigators ACC LBCT 2018

FastTest. You ve read the book now test yourself

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Nothing to disclose

Revived indications for thrombus aspiration during primary PCI: Unanswered questions after TAPAS

Biodegradable Stents An update and work-in

SKG Congress, 2015 EVOLVE II. Stephan Windecker

Jose Mª de la Torre Hernandez, MD, PhD, FESC. Cardiologia Valdecilla Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla Santander. SPAIN

Belinda Green, Cardiologist, SDHB, 2016

Invasive Imaging (IVUS, VH-IVUS, and OCT): How I Implement into My

EBC London 2013 Provisional SB stenting strategy with kissing balloon with Absorb

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

Κλινική Χρήση IVUS και OCT PERIKLIS A. DAVLOUROS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF CARDIOLOGY INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY & CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

Vulnerable Plaque Pathophysiology, Detection, and Intervention. VP: A Local Problem or Systemic Disease. Erling Falk, Denmark

In-Ho Chae. Seoul National University College of Medicine

Coronary Artery Stenosis. Insight from MAIN-COMPARE Study

Benefit of Performing PCI Based on FFR

From the Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque to CAD Management

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Coronary Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China 10-Year Results From the China PEACE-Retrospective CathPCI Study

Can We Safely Defer PCI. Yes, already proven

Plaque Shift vs. Carina Shift Prevalence and Implication

Non merci! Revascularisation complète à la phase aigue de l infarctus? 8 e Cardiorun, La Réunion, 1 er octobre Gilles Rioufol, MD, PhD

IVUS Assessment of the Mechanism of In-stent Restenosis? Gary S. Mintz, MD Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-516, NCT#

Transcription:

The PROSPECT Trial Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque Gregg W. Stone, MD PROSPECT Investigators

The PROSPECT Trial 700 pts with ACS UA (with ECG ) or NSTEMI or STEMI >24º undergoing PCI of 1 or 2 major coronary arteries at up to 40 sites in the U.S. and Europe Metabolic S. Waist circum Fast lipids Fast glu HgbA1C Fast insulin Creatinine PCI of culprit lesion(s) Successful and uncomplicated Formally enrolled PI: Gregg W. Stone Sponsor: Abbott Vascular; Partner: Volcano Biomarkers Hs CRP IL-6 scd40l MPO TNFα MMP9 Lp-PLA2 others

The PROSPECT Trial 3-vessel imaging post PCI Culprit artery, followed by non-culprit arteries Angiography (QCA of entire coronary tree) IVUS Virtual histology Palpography (n=~350) Proximal 6-8 cm of each coronary artery Meds rec Aspirin Plavix 1yr Statin Repeat biomarkers @ 30 days, 6 months F/U: 1 mo, 6 mo, 1 yr, 2 yr, ±3-5 5 yrs MSCT Substudy N=50-100 Repeat imaging in pts with events

PROSPECT: Methodology Virtual histology lesion classification Lesions are classified into 5 main types 1. Fibrotic 2. Fibrocalcific 3. Pathological intimal thickening (PIT) 4. Thick cap fibroatheroma (ThCFA) 5. VH-thin cap fibroatheroma (VH-TCFA) (presumed high risk)

PROSPECT: Primary Endpoint MACE attributable to rapid angiographic progression of a non-culprit lesion* Cardiac death Cardiac arrest Myocardial infarction Unstable angina - Requiring revascularization - Requiring rehospitalization Increasing angina - Requiring revascularization - Requiring rehospitalization Most severe Hierarchical Least severe MACE during FU were adjudicated by the CEC as attributable to culprit lesions (those treated during or before the index hospitalization) or non culprit lesions (untreated areas as of the coronary tree) based on angiography (+ECGs, etc.) at the time of the event; events occurring in pts without angiographic follow-up were considered indeterminate in origin. Rapid lesion progression = in QCA DS by >20% from baseline to FU.

PROSPECT: MACE 25 20 All Culprit lesion (CL) related Non culprit lesion (NCL) related Indeterminate 18.1% 20.4% MACE (%) 15 10 13.2% 7.9% 11.4% 9.4% 12.9% 11.6% 5 0 6.4% 0.9% 1.9% 2.7% 0 1 2 3 Time in Years Number at risk ALL 697 557 506 480 CL related 697 590 543 518 NCL related 697 595 553 521 Indeterminate 697 634 604 583

PROSPECT: NCL MACE 12 Non-culprit lesion (NCL) related, all 11.6% - Without rapid lesion progression (RLP) - With rapid lesion progression (RLP) 10 9.4% MACE (%) 8 6 4 6.4% 4.1% 5.5% 4.9% 6.7% 6.4% 2 0 2.9% Median time to event No RLP: 223 [85, 663] days RLP: 401 [229, 666] days 0 1 2 3 Time in Years Number at risk NCL related, all 697 595 553 521 - without RLP 697 610 577 551 - with RLP 697 620 579 550

PROSPECT: Correlates of Non Culprit Lesion Related Events Lesion HR 3.8 (2.2, 6.6) P value Prevalence* 51.2% 5.0 (2.9, 8.7) 49.1% 7.9 (4.6, 13.8) 6.4 (3.4, 12.2) 30.7% 17.4% 6.7 (3.4, 13.0) 15.4% 10.8 (5.5, 21.0) 10.8 (4.3, 27.2) 11.0% *Likelihood of one or more such lesions being present per patient. PB = plaque burden at the MLA 4.6%

PROSPECT: Conclusions From this trial, the first prospective, natural history study of atherosclerosis using multimodality imaging to characterize the coronary tree, we can conclude that: Approximately 20% of pts with ACS successfully treated with stents and contemporary medical Rx develop MACE within 3 years, with adverse events equally attributable to recurrence at originally treated culprit lesions (treatment failure) and to previously untreated non culprit coronary segments Approximately 12% of pts develop MACE from non culprit lesions during 3 years of follow-up Patients treated with contemporary medical therapy who develop non culprit lesion events present most commonly with progressive or unstable angina, and rarely with cardiac death, cardiac arrest or MI

PROSPECT: Conclusions While plaques which are responsible for unanticipated future MACE are frequently angiographically mild, most untreated plaques which become symptomatic have a large plaque burden and a small lumen area (which are detectable by IVUS but not by angiography) Only about half of new events due to non culprit lesions exemplify the classic notion of vulnerable plaque (rapid lesion progression of mild angiographic lesions), while half are attributable to unrecognized ed and untreated severe disease with minimal change over time The prospective identification of non culprit lesions prone to develop MACE within 3 years can be enhanced by characterization of underlying plaque morphology with virtual histology, with VH-TCFAs representing the highest risk lesion type The combination of large plaque burden (IVUS) and a large necrotic core without a visible cap (VH-TCFA) identifies lesions which are at especially high risk for future adverse cardiovascular events