The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 7 January 2009

Similar documents
The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 27 May 2009

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 21 October 2009

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 9 March 2011

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 28 March 2012

State of the art treatment of hypertension: established and new drugs. Prof. M. Burnier Service of Nephrology and Hypertension Lausanne, Switzerland

By Prof. Khaled El-Rabat

Scientific conclusions and detailed explanation of the scientific grounds for the differences from the PRAC recommendation

Volume 6; Number 1 January 2012 NICE CLINICAL GUIDELINE 127: HYPERTENSION CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY HYPERTENSION IN ADULTS (AUGUST 2011)

Clinical cases with Coversyl 10 mg

Don t let the pressure get to you:

Preventing and Treating High Blood Pressure

Management of Hypertension

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 4 November 2009

Modern Management of Hypertension

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 27 May 2009

ASEBP and ARTA TARP Drugs and Reference Price by Categories

Modern Management of Hypertension: Where Do We Draw the Line?

Conversion of losartan to lisinopril

Factors Involved in Poor Control of Risk Factors

Treating Hypertension in Individuals with Diabetes

Hypertension (JNC-8)

Hypertension Update 2009

Scientific conclusions and detailed explanation of the scientific grounds for the differences from the PRAC recommendation

Managing Hypertension in 2016

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment. ACE Inhibitor and Angiotensin II Antagonist Combination Treatment GUIDELINES

Outcomes and Perspectives of Single-Pill Combination Therapy for the modern management of hypertension

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Specific effects of calcium channel blockers in diabetic nephropathy GUIDELINES

ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION

Hypertension Update Clinical Controversies Regarding Age and Race

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 29 April 2009

Which antihypertensives are more effective in reducing diastolic hypertension versus systolic hypertension? May 24, 2017

In the Literature 1001 BP of 1.1 mm Hg). The trial was stopped early based on prespecified stopping rules because of a significant difference in cardi

New Lipid Guidelines. PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN: Implications of the New Guidelines for Hypertension and Lipids.

Managing hypertension: a question of STRATHE

Antihypertensive Agents Part-2. Assistant Prof. Dr. Najlaa Saadi PhD Pharmacology Faculty of Pharmacy University of Philadelphia

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 15 October 2008

Don t let the pressure get to you:

ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION

Annual Review of Antihypertensives - Fiscal Year 2009

Adapted d from Federation of Health Regulatory Colleges of Ontario Template Last Updated September 18, 2017

The hypertensive effects of the renin-angiotensin

MODERN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION Where Do We Draw the Line? Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Blood Pressure and Risk

Amlodipine/olmesartan (Azor ) is indicated for the treatment of hypertension, alone or in combination with other antihypertensive medications.

Hypertension Update Warwick Jaffe Interventional Cardiologist Ascot Hospital

Lisinopril 20 converting to losartan

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE Opinion 4 December 2013

Dr Narender Goel MD (Internal Medicine and Nephrology) Financial Disclosure: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Lisinopril losartan conversion dose

Introductory Clinical Pharmacology Chapter 41 Antihypertensive Drugs

Executive Summary. Different antihypertensive drugs as first line therapy in patients with essential hypertension 1

STANDARD treatment algorithm mmHg

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment. Blood Pressure Control role of specific antihypertensives

Efficacy and safety of Olmesartan,Losartan, Valsartan, and Irbesartan in the Control of Essential Hypertension

Explore the Rationale for the Dual Mechanism CCB/ARB Approach in Hypertension Management

Metabolic Consequences of Anti Hypertensives: Is It Clinically Important?

Clinical Updates in the Treatment of Hypertension JNC 7 vs. JNC 8. Lauren Thomas, PharmD PGY1 Pharmacy Practice Resident South Pointe Hospital

APPENDIX D: PHARMACOTYHERAPY EVIDENCE

JNC Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults

Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan compared with other antihypertensive drugs

Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease

Hypertension Pharmacotherapy: A Practical Approach

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 19 December 2007

Losartan lisinopril equivalent dose 新着 news 2018 年 3 月 6 日高等部 3 年生 大阪リゾート & スポーツ専門学校に合格! 2018 年 3 月 2 日茨木市立山手台小学校との交流.

Jared Moore, MD, FACP

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

À ². The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 19 September 2012

Clinical Policy: Angiotesin II Receptor Blockers and Renin Inhibitors Reference Number: CP.HNMC.15 Effective Date: Last Review Date: 08.

Management of Lipid Disorders and Hypertension: Implications of the New Guidelines

Hypertension in the Elderly. John Puxty Division of Geriatrics Center for Studies in Aging and Health, Providence Care

Managing Hypertension in Diabetes Sean Stewart, PharmD, BCPS, BCACP, CLS Internal Medicine Park Nicollet Clinic St Louis Park.

Guidelines for the Prescribing of Sacubitril / Valsartan

Hypertension Management: A Moving Target

Younger adults with a family history of premature artherosclerotic disease should have their cardiovascular risk factors measured.

Generic Drugs: What does equal really mean? Dr. Peter J. Lin Director Primary Care Initiatives Canadian Heart Research Centre

Class Update: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs), Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs), and Direct Renin Inhibitors (DRIs)

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

CONTRAINDICATIONS: Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients

BLOOD PRESSURE-LOWERING TREATMENT

Antihypertensive Agents

ALLHAT. Major Outcomes in High Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic

Losartan lisinopril equivalent dose

2014 HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES

Hypertension. Does it Matter What Medications We Use? Nishant K. Sekaran, M.D. M.Sc. Intermountain Heart Institute

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 18 March 2009

New Treatment Options for Diabetic Nephropathy patients. Prof. M. Burnier, Service of Nephrology and Hypertension CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland

Section 3, Lecture 2

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 19 July 2006

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 28 March 2012

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE. Opinion. 20 February 2008

Understanding the importance of blood pressure control An overview of new guidelines: How do they impact daily current management?

ACP Brief Fall 2006 prioritization. Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) for Proteinuria, Hypertension (HTN) and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 6 October 2010

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Abbreviations Cardiology I

ACEBUTOLOL HCL 100MG TABLET GENERIC BETA BLOCKERS ALISKIREN 150MG TABLET RASILAZ RENIN INHIBITOR

Heart Failure Clinician Guide JANUARY 2018

Clinical Policy: ACEI and ARB Duplicate Therapy Reference Number: CP.PMN.61 Effective Date: Last Review Date: 05.18

HTN: 80 mg once daily 23,f 80 mg once daily 23,f Hypertension 40, 80 mg $82.66 (80 mg once daily) HTN: 8-32 mg daily in one or two divided doses 1

JNC 8 -Controversies. Sagren Naidoo Nephrologist CMJAH

Transcription:

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION 7 January 2009 LERCAPRESS 10 mg/10 mg, film-coated tablets Pack of 30 (CIP code: 385 953-3) Pack of 90 (CIP code: 387 387-5) Applicant: PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT Enalapril/Lercanidipine List I Date of Marketing Authorisation: 09/07/2008 (MA variation of 01/08/2008) Reason for request: Inclusion on the list of medicines reimbursed by National Insurance and approved for use by hospitals. Medical, Economic and Public Health Assessment Division 1

1. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT 1.1. Active ingredient LERCAPRESS 10 mg / 10 mg: 1 tablet contains 10 mg of enalapril maleate (equivalent to 7.64 mg of enalapril) and 10 mg of lercanidipine hydrochloride (equivalent to 9.44 mg of lercanidipine). NB: This is the first fixed-dose combination of enalapril and lercanidipine. 1.2. Indication - LERCAPRESS 10 mg / 10 mg: Treatment of essential hypertension in patients insufficiently controlled by the administration of lercanidipine 10 mg as monotherapy. LERCAPRESS 10 mg/10 mg fixed-dose combination should not be used for initial treatment of hypertension. 1.3. Dosage LERCAPRESS 10 mg / 10 mg: In hypertensive patients insufficiently controlled by lercanidipine 10 mg monotherapy, the dose of lercanidipine may be increased to 20 mg as monotherapy or treatment may be replaced by LERCAPRESS 10 mg /10 mg. Individual dosage adjustment of each ingredient is recommended. A direct switch from monotherapy to the fixed-dose combination may be attempted if clinically justified. The usual recommended dosage is one tablet per day administered at least 15 minutes before meals. Treatment should preferably be administered in the morning. This medicinal product must not be taken with grapefruit. Specific situations - Elderly patients: The dosage must be adjusted according to renal function (see Use in patients with impaired renal function ). - Children and adolescents aged under 18 years: the use of LERCAPRESS is not currently recommended as there are no clinical data. - Renal impairment:. LERCAPRESS is contraindicated in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min) or in patients on haemodialysis. Treatment must be instituted with caution in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. - Hepatic impairment: LERCAPRESS is contra-indicated in patients with severe impairment of hepatic function. Treatment must be instituted with caution in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. 2

2. SIMILAR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS 2.1. ATC Classification (2008) C : Cardiovascular system C09 : Medicinal products acting on the renin-angiotensin system C09B : Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) in combination C09BB : Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and calcium antagonists. C09BB02 : Enalapril and lercanidipine 2.2. Medicines in the same therapeutic category - Separate administration of 10 mg/day of enalapril (RENITEC 5 mg or 20 mg, tablets) and 10 mg/day of lercanidipine (LERCAN 10 mg, ZANIDIP 10 mg, tablets). - Fixed-dose combinations of an ACEi and a calcium channel blocker: trandolapril 2 mg + verapamil 180 mg:tarka PR; OKADRIK PR. 2.3. Medicines with a similar therapeutic aim All medicinal products indicated in the treatment of essential hypertension: other antihypertensives prescribed as monotherapy or in combinations. Other medicines containing fixed-dose combinations of an ACEi, calcium channel blocker or sartan: a. Angiotensin-II receptor antagonist (sartans) + calcium channel blocker: valsartan 80 mg/160 mg + amlodipine 5 mg/10 mg: EXFORGE b. ACEi + Diuretic: benazepril 10mg + HCTZ 1 12.5mg: BRIAZIDE, CIBADREX captopril 50mg + HCTZ 25.0mg: CAPTEA, ECAZIDE, and G 2 enalapril 20mg + HCTZ 12.5mg: CO-RENITEC, and G fosinopril 20mg + HCTZ 12.5mg: FOZIRETIC lisinopril 20mg + HCTZ 12.5mg: PRINZIDE,ZESTORETIC, and G perindopril 2 mg (4mg) + indapamide 0.625 mg (1.25mg): PRETERAX, BIPRETERAX quinapril 20mg + HCTZ 12.5mg: ACUILIX, KORETIC, and G ramipril 5 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg: COTRIATEC zofenopril 30 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg: ZOFENILDUO c. Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists (sartans) + Diuretic: candesartan 8 mg or 16 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg: COKENZEN, HYTACAND eprosartan 600 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg: COTEVETEN irbesartan 150 mg ( or 300 mg) + HCTZ 12.5 mg (or 25 mg) COAPROVEL losartan 50 mg (or 100 mg) + HCTZ 12.5 mg (or 25 mg) FORTZAAR, HYZAAR olmesartan medoximil 20 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg (or 25 mg) ALTEISDUO, COOLMETEC telmisartan 40 mg or 80 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg MICARDISPLUS, PRITORPLUS valsartan 80 mg or 160 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg (or 25 mg) COTAREG, NISISCO d. Calcium channel blocker + beta-blocker: nifedipine 20 mg + atenolol 50 mg: BETA-ADALATE, TENORDATE, and G 1 Hydrochlorothiazide, thiazide diuretic: HCTZ. 2 G : proprietary generic medicines. Cf. list of generic drugs, Afssaps. 3

3. ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE DATA 3.1. Efficacy The evaluation of the efficacy and adverse effects of LERCAPRESS is mainly based on the results of a comparative study: study CPL1-0018. Design The objective of this randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study was to show that the enalapril 10 mg (E10) + lercanidipine 10 mg (E10/L10) combination has an additional antihypertensive efficacy in hypertensive patients insufficiently controlled by lercanidipine monotherapy 10 mg (L10). An open-label follow-up phase of nine months was added. The primary endpoint (efficacy) was the mean reduction in seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between the two arms, after 12 weeks (3 months) of treatment, in the ITT population. Baseline values were the measurements made after 4 weeks of lercanidipine monotherapy. NB: For an expected reduction of 3 mm Hg in DBP, a sample of 272 patients (136 per arm) was necessary to obtain a power of 90% with a two-sided significance level α = 0.05. A total of 300 patients therefore had to be included assuming that 10% of patients are lost to follow-up. Secondary efficacy endpoints were in particular: Mean reduction in the seated systolic blood pressure (SBP); Percentage of patients with "normal" blood pressure at the end of the study according to the following criteria: o Percentage of patients with DBP < 90 mm Hg o Percentage of patients with SBP < 140 mm Hg o Percentage of patients with BP < 140/90 mm Hg Percentage of responder patients with the following values: o DBP < 90 mm Hg or reduction compared to baseline values > 10 mm Hg o SBP < 140 mm Hg or reduction compared to baseline values > 20 mm Hg Main inclusion criteria: - Man or woman aged at least 18 years; - Diagnosis of essential hypertension; - No significant sign of disease other that hypertension, in the investigator's opinion; Main exclusion criteria: - Secondary hypertension; - Heart failure (New York Heart Association, (NYHA) class III and IV); - Valvular heart disease; cardiac arrhythmia; - Hypertensive retinopathy; - Diabetes mellitus with poor blood glucose control or diabetes mellitus complicated by retinopathy, peripheral neuropathy or clinically significant autonomic neuropathy; - Serum creatinine > 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN); hepatic enzymes > 2 times ULN (aspartate aminotransferase ASAT and/or alanine aminotransferase ALAT); serum bilirubin > 1.5 times ULN. - Patients weighing more than 40% of their ideal weight for their height according to the Broca index: height (in centimetres) - 100 = ideal body weight (in kg); - Non-compliance during the single-blind screening period, defined as taking less than 80% or more than 120% of the assigned study medication. 4

NB: during the screening periods on placebo and the single-blind monotherapy periods, patients with DBP > 114 mm Hg or SBP > 189 mm Hg were withdrawn from the study (for safety reasons). Patients with a DBP < 95 mm Hg were considered responders to treatment and were therefore also withdrawn. From visit 5 until the end of the study, patients with a DBP > 109 mm Hg or SBP > 179 mm Hg were withdrawn from the study (for safety reasons). Results This study was performed in 342 patients insufficiently controlled by 10 mg of lercanidipine, i.e. with a diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 114 mm Hg and a systolic blood pressure between 140 and 189 mm Hg. Primary efficacy endpoint: the reduction in diastolic blood pressure was - 7.1 mm Hg in the E10/L10 arm versus - 4.3 mm Hg in the L10 arm, i.e. an additional reduction in favour of the combination of 2.8 mm Hg, p<0.001. Secondary endpoints: - An additional reduction in the systolic blood pressure of 5.4 mm Hg (p<0.001) in favour of the combination was observed. - The responder rate was higher with the fixed-dose combination than with monotherapy: 41% versus 24% (p<0.001) for the systolic blood pressure and 35% versus 24%, (p=0.032) for the diastolic blood pressure. - Normal blood pressure values were restored in a higher percentage of patients receiving the fixed-dose combination (29% versus 19%, p=0.023, and 39% versus 22%, p<0.001 for DBP and SBP respectively) than in those on monotherapy. Mean DBP and SBP values after 12 weeks of treatment: L10/E10 n=167 L10 n=175 Mean baseline DBP (mm Hg) 100 +/- 3 100 +/- 4 Mean baseline SBP (mm Hg) 152 +/-11 152 +/- 11 Mean change from baseline in DBP (mm Hg/95% CI) after 12 weeks. -7.1 +/- 0.63-4.3 +/- 0.62 Mean change from baseline in SBP (mm Hg/95% CI) after 12 weeks. -7.7 +/- 1.05-2.3 +/- 1.03 Remarks: The results of this study have little clinical relevance for the assessment of the benefit of LERCAPRESS 10 mg /10 mg in the management of hypertensive patients. The antihypertensive efficacy was assessed by comparison with lercanidipine monotherapy at a dosage of 10 mg/day in patients already considered to be insufficiently controlled by 10 mg/day of lercanidipine. Moreover, in routine practice, the dosage of enalapril required to obtain blood pressure control is 20 mg/day in most patients and not 10 mg/day. 5

3.2. Adverse effects The study data showed that the combination of these two active ingredients did not cause any new adverse effects. In the safety analysis of all the studies in the MA dossier, treatment-related adverse events were observed in 39/329 (11.9%) of patients with E10/L10 and in 69/410 (16.8%) of patients with E20/L10. The most frequent adverse effects during these studies were cough (5.6%), nausea (2.5%) and headaches (2.1%). 3.3. Conclusion LERCAPRESS is a fixed-dose combination of enalapril and lercanidipine. Its clinical evaluation was mainly based on the results of a randomised double-blind comparison of an "add-on" treatment in 342 patients insufficiently controlled by 10 mg of lercanidipine. An additional reduction of 2.8 mm Hg in the diastolic blood pressure was obtained with the combination of 10 mg of lercanidipine + 10 mg of enalapril (- 7.1 mm Hg versus - 4.3 mm Hg, p<0.001) compared to treatment with 10 mg/day of lercanidipine for 12 weeks. This study shows that the combination of these two antihypertensives (lercanidipine + enalapril) reduces blood pressure values more effectively than one of these agents used alone (lercanidipine 10 mg). The value of using these two antihypertensives in a fixed-dose combination compared with separate administration was not established. Moreover, the combination of 10 mg of lercanidipine and 10 mg of enalapril was not shown to have any benefit in terms of a reduction in morbidity and mortality. The usefulness of this combination compared to other antihypertensive combinations (medicinal products in the same class or other classes) was not shown. The safety profile of the lercanidipine 10 mg + enalapril 10 mg combination during studies was the same as that known for the two active ingredients. A reduction in the risk of adverse effects with the low-dose combination (10 mg/10 mg) was not therefore established. 6

4. TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE CONCLUSIONS 4.1. Actual benefit Essential hypertension may have life-threatening complications. These proprietary drugs are intended for preventive treatment. The efficacy/safety ratio of LERCAPRESS 10 mg/10 mg combination, evaluated from the reduction in blood pressure values, is moderate. The therapeutic value of LERCAPRESS 10 mg/10 mg was not clearly established as it was assessed from the results of a clinical study comparing the antihypertensive efficacy of 10 mg/day enalapril + 10 mg/day of lercanidipine with that of 10 mg/day of enalapril in patients already insufficiently controlled by 10 mg/day of enalapril. The relevance of this study for the assessment of the clinical value of LERCAPRESS 10 mg/10 mg in the management of hypertensive patients may be doubted as monotherapy with 10 mg/day enalapril was unable to control blood pressure in most of these patients. No assessment was made of this fixeddose combination compared to enalapril monotherapy at the usual dose (20 mg/day), other monotherapies (many alternatives are available) or other antihypertensive combinations with better-established efficacy (cf. ACCOMPLISH 3 study results for example where the protocol planned to treat patients at maximum tolerated doses). The population of the patients who may benefit from this combination is not defined (cf. target population). Public health benefit The public health burden of essential hypertension and the cardiovascular diseases for which hypertension is a risk factor is high. A reduction in the morbidity and mortality caused by hypertension is a recognised public health need (priority identified by GTNDO* and the law of public health). However, existing treatments (including the free combination of Enalapril and Lercanidipine) already help address this need. There is no evidence suggesting that treatment by this fixed-dose combination is better that a free combination of these two active ingredients (including in terms of compliance). The proprietary medicine LERCAPRESS is not therefore expected to have an impact on morbidity and mortality or quality of life. Accordingly, the proprietary drug LERCAPRESS is not expected to benefit public health. * GTNDO: National Technical Group for Defining Public Health Objectives (DGS-2003) There are many alternative medications with a demonstrated benefit in terms of a reduction in morbidity and mortality: diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (including amlodipine) or other renin-angiotensin system antagonists. Conclusion: The actual benefit of LERCAPRESS 10 mg/10 mg is insufficient in view of the available clinical data: this data is insufficient to assess its value for the management of hypertensive patients. 4.2. Improvement in actual benefit Not applicable 3 Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, Dahlöf B et al. ACCOMPLISH Trial Investigators. Benazepril plus Amlodipine or Hydrochlorothiazide for Hypertension in High-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2417-28. 7

4.3. Therapeutic use Antihypertensive medication aims to prevent the cardiovascular and renal complications of hypertension. The objective of these agents is to restore normal blood pressure values. Diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers and other renin-angiotensin system antagonists have been shown to reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular complications. For these reasons, the national or international recommendations propose to start antihypertensive treatment with one of these medicinal products. The Committee points out that the value of fixed-dose combinations in the management of hypertensive patients in comparison with separate administration of (two) drugs has not been established. 4.4. Target population Not applicable 4.5. Transparency Committee recommendations The Transparency Committee did not recommend inclusion of LERCAPRESS 10 mg/10 mg on the list of medicines reimbursed by National Insurance and on the list of medicinal products approved for use in the hospital and various public services in the indications and dosages of the MA. 8