NDO NSP. YI Zhong-hua ZHU Nian-hua LI Guan-hong SONG Xiao-zhen PAN Ke QU Ming-ren

Similar documents
ISAPP, London UK June 26-28, 28, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana. Introduction

THE EFFECT OF NON-STARCH POLYSACCHARIDES DERIVED FROM DIFFERENT GRAINS ON PERFORMANCE AND DIGESTIVE ACTIVITY IN LAYING HENS

Health Benefits of Prebiotic Dietary Fiber

What are the 6 Nutrients. Carbohydrates Proteins Fats/Oils (Lipids) Vitamins Minerals Water

Heidi Rossow, PhD UC Davis School Of Veterinary Medicine, VMTRC Tulare, CA. Interpreting Forage Quality from the Cows Perspective

COW SUPPLEMENTATION: GETTING THE BEST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK. Low Quality Forage. Ruminant Digestive Anatomy. How do we get the best bang for the buck?

Nonstructural and Structural Carbohydrates in Dairy Cattle Rations 1

Investigation of relationship of chemical composition, viscosity, and metabolizable energy of distillers grains for poultry

Energy Value of Corn Milling Co-Products in Swine B. J. Kerr, USDA-ARS / P. V. Anderson, Iowa State University / G. C. Shurson, University of

Introduction. Carbohydrate Nutrition. Microbial CHO Metabolism. Microbial CHO Metabolism. CHO Fractions. Fiber CHO (FC)

EFFECT OF DIETARY SUPPLEMENTATION OF NON-STARCH POLYSACCHARIDE DEGRADING ENZYMES ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF BROILER CHICKS

The Rumen Inside & Out

Physiology of the gut and mechanisms of prebiotic effect. Joanne Slavin, Ph.D, R.D. Department of Food Science and Nutrition University of Minnesota

Supplementation of High Corn Silage Diets for Dairy Cows. R. D. Shaver Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist

Understanding Dairy Nutrition Terminology

DIET DIGESTIBILITY AND RUMEN TRAITS IN RESPONSE TO FEEDING WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND A PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

NON-STARCH POLYSACCHARIDES AND PHYTATE PHOSPHORUS CONTENT OF COMMONLY AVAILABLE POULTRY FEED INGREDIENTS*

Update on Food and Feed

In vitro assessment of starch digestion in pigs

EFFECTS OF HEMICELL ADDITION TO NURSERY DIETS ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF WEANLING PIGS. Authors: Story in Brief

Gut Physiology of Pigs Fed Carbohydrate Degrading Enzymes

PREBIOTIC MECHANISMS OF ACTION

CARBOHYDRATES. Created for BCLM Pony Club Nutrition #14

Soya in animal nutrition: which improvements can be expected?

Rumination or cud chewing consists of regurgitation, remastication, reinsalvation, and reswallowing.

Saturday, March 24, 12

Production Costs. Learning Objectives. Essential Nutrients. The Marvels of Ruminant Digestion

FEED ENZYMES IN POULTRY NUTRITION: RECENT FINDINGS DAVID J. FARRELL AND ERNEST MARTIN SUMMARY

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTING PRAIRIE HAY WITH TWO LEVELS OF CORN AND FOUR LEVELS OF DEGRADABLE INTAKE PROTEIN. II. RUMINAL PARAMETERS OF STEERS.

A TECHNICAL UPDATE ON THE USE OF ENZYMES IN ANIMAL FEED HADDEN GRAHAM GLOBAL SERVICES DIRECTOR

Introduction billion gallons of ethanol were produced in the U.S. during 2009.

The Role That Enzymes Can Play In Terms Of Increasing The Efficiency By Which Animals Convert Feed Into Protein

Studies on Hypolipemic Effect of Cyclocarya paliurus Batal Iljinskaja Polysaccharide

Fiber fermentation in pigs and poultry

WEIGHTS OF DIGESTIVE ORGANS, CAECAL METABOLITES AND FERMENTATION STOICHIOMETRY IN COYPUS AND RABBITS. CZ Prague 4, Czech Republic.

STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF EM SILAGE

Established Facts. Impact of Post Harvest Forage on the Rumen Function. Known Facts. Known Facts

Benefits of feed additives beyond growth related performance

Nutritive Value of Canola Meal: The Dietary Fibre Story

Background. GHG Gasses from Swine 7/20/2012. Nutritional Effects on Nutrient Excretion and Gas Emissions and the Carbon Footprint of Swine

Comparison of Sample Source (Excreta or Ileal Digesta) and Age of Broiler Chick on Measurement of Apparent Digestible Energy of Wheat and Barley 1

Effect of Ca 2 + /CaM Messenger on Drought Resistance of Phyllostachys edulis

Dr. Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Lecompte FINAL REPORT. January 14, 2011

Feed. The major cost of animal production

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

Selective enrichment of key bacterial groups within the human colon in response to changes in diet

Certification GMP, HACCP Certification ISO 9001:2008

Formulating Lactating Cow Diets for Carbohydrates

Fermentation of fibrous material from DDGS and rapeseed meal in pigs. 20 June 2014, Sonja de Vries

Animal Digestion and Nutrition

The fate of nutritionally important components during processing of feed and the effects on animal performance. Kari Lundblad

Maximising Matrix benefits from enzymes, options for feed producers.

Liquid By-Products to Pigs. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Understanding the SACN Report on Carbohydrates & Health

EFFECT OF XYLANASES ON THE INTESTINAL FLORA

Microstructure of grains as an indicator of

Resistant Starch A Comparative Nutrition Review. James M. Lattimer Ph.D., PAS Assistant Professor Animal Sciences & Industry

Alternative co-products streams from grains used in pet food applications. Presented by: Greg Aldrich, PhD

FIBRE FERMENTATION IN THE PIG INTESTINE:

What is Dietary Fiber and how do you select the appropriate method?

Do enzymes play role in gut health?

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ADDITIVES ON SILAGE QUALITY OF NAPIERGRASS. Y.K.Cheng, C.S. Chen and P.W. Peng

D. Hong*, D. Ragland, and O. Adeola* 2. Departments of *Animal Sciences and Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907

14. Digestion of Grain

SUBSTITUTING STEAM-FLAKED CORN WITH DISTILLER S GRAINS ALTERS RUMINAL FERMENTATION AND DIET DIGESTIBILITY

Nitrogen, Ammonia Emissions and the Dairy Cow

Use of Deoiled DDGS in Poultry. S. L. Noll, Ph.D. Professor and Poultry Extension Specialist

What is ProPound Canola Meal?

Animal Digestion and Nutrition. Objective 7.02: Understand the digestive process

Soybean, Canola and Cottonseed Meal

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENT SOURCE ON INTAKE, DIGESTION AND RUMINAL KINETICS OF STEERS FED PRAIRIE HAY. Authors:

Opportunities in the feed milling industry by combining new generation xylanase and phytase enzymes. Rob ten Doeschate AB Vista Feed Ingredients

IMPROVING THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF LUPIN SEED FOR

Effect of different levels of probio-enzyme on head, brain, lung, testes, kidney, crop, proventriculus and pancreas characteristics of broilers

EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS ENZYMES AND HERBAL RESIDUES ON THE PERFORMANCE, NUTRIENT UTILIZATION AND BALANCE IN GROWING CROSS-BRED PIGS

International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciences

EFFECT OF DIETARY FAT ADDITION ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE, NUTRIENT DIGESTION AND CAECUM FERMENTATION IN 2-3 MONTHS OLD MEAT RABBITS

DDGS: An Evolving Commodity. Dr. Jerry Shurson University of Minnesota

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS

Effects of Post-harvest Storage Duration and Variety on Nutrient Digestibility and Energy Content Wheat in Finishing Pigs

Dietary Protein. Dr. Mark McGuire Dr. Jullie Wittman AVS Department University of Idaho

Effect of the Frequency of Corn Supplementation on a High Quality Alfalfa Hay Utilization by Cattle

Paper No.: 01. Paper Title: FOOD CHEMISTRY. Module 08: Dietary fibre: Classification, properties and. role in health

Advances in Understanding Enzyme Substrates in Feed and Available Solutions. Luis Romero, PhD October 14 th, 2015

Effects of Feed Viscosity on Water Excretion in Meat-Turkey Poults

NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY AND PERFORMANCE OF BROILERS FED CULTIVARS OF MARITIME CANADIAN WHEAT

Dietary, processing and animal factors affecting energy digestibility in swine 1

Effects of Xylanase in High-Co-Product Diets on Nutrient Digestibility in Finishing Pigs 1

Evaluation of Ruma Pro (a calcium-urea product) on microbial yield and efficiency in continuous culture

Physicochemical characterisation of dietary fibre and the implication for the gut environment

Isfahan , IRAN; 2 Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, IRAN

EFFECT OF MASH DIETARY FIBER ON PERFORMANCE AND CANNIBALISM IN LAYING HENS

The four stomachs of a dairy cow

Prebiotics affect nutrient digestibility but not faecal ammonia in dogs fed increased dietary protein levels

Published March 3, 2017

Applying Enzyme Technology to Optimize the Utilization of Fibrous Feed Ingredients in Swine Diets - Nutrient Digestibility NPB #13-191

Fiber. Total Digestible Fiber. Carbohydrate Fractions of Forages Fiber Fractions. 4/18/2014. Week 3 Lecture 9. Clair Thunes, PhD

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS. Rumen Escape Protein of some Dairy Feedstuffs

Food & Nutrition Evaluation - Carbohydrate 2 -

FACING THE DIMINISHING CORN SUPPLY: DAIRY ALTERNATIVES

Transcription:

2012 34 2 345-350 http / /xuebao. jxau. edu. cn Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis E - mail ndxb7775@ sina. com NDO NSP 330045 NDO NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP S831. 5 A 1000-2286 2012 02-0345 - 06 Comparative Evaluation of the in Vitro Fermentation Characteristics of Selected Non-digestible Oligosaccharides and Non-starch Polysaccharides Using Caecal Microbial Inoculum from Broilers YI Zhong-hua ZHU Nian-hua LI Guan-hong SONG Xiao-zhen PAN Ke QU Ming-ren College of Animal Science and Technology JAU Nanchang 330045 China Abstract An in vitro experiment in comparison of fermentation characteristics of selected non - digestible oligosaccharides NDO and non - starch polysaccharides NSP was conducted using caecal microbial inoculum from broilers fed an antibiotics - free diet. The results showed that the total production of SCFA from the fermentation of NDO was higher than that of NSP. The fermentability ranked in the order of Raffinose > Stachyose > Fructooligosaccharides FOS > mannanoligosaccharides MOS in NDO and ranked in the order of Wheat NSP > Soybean meal NSP > Corn NSP > Wheat bran NSP > Cellulose in NSP. In addition the molar percentage of acetate from the fermentation of NSP was higher whereas the percentage of propionate from that of NDO was higher. Compared with insoluble NSP the fermentation characteristics of soluble NSP was closer to that of NDO. Key words non-digestible oligosaccharides non-starch polysaccharides broilers in vitro fermentation short-chain fatty acid 2011-10 - 26 2012-02 - 16 GJJ09170 2003 1971 E - mail yizhcn@ 126. com

346 34 Non - digestible oligosaccharide NDO Non - starch polysaccharide NSP 1 2-3 4-5 NSP 1 1. 1 48 1 AA AA 42 08 00 12-80 1. 2 1. 2. 1 92. 36% 4. 69% 2. 18% 85. 74% 7. 03% 3. 29% 1. 83% 1. 13% 39. 81% 49. 78% 7. 06% > 99. 0% > 28% 1. 2. 2 4 Choct Annison 6 NSP 1. 3 1. 3. 1 Sunvold 7 1. 3. 2 0. 3 g 0. 001 g 250 ml 30 ml 121 20 min 3 1. 3. 3 1 10 200 250 ml CO 2 1. 3. 4 1 ml CO 2 37 6 12 24 h 4 ml SCFA ph 1. 4 1. 4. 1 Lee 8 4 NSP TDF SDF IDF 9 4 NSP DM CP 1. 4. 2 Carre 10

2 NDO NSP 347 1. 5 Excel SPSS 14. 0 One - Way ANOVY Duncan ± X ± S P < 0. 05 2 2. 1 NSP NSP 1 22. 07% 20. 37% 12. 16% 4 NSP NSP NSP 15. 45% NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP Tab. 1 1 % Composition of dietary fiber and the alkali extracted NSP of the feedstuffs % Air dry basis Item Corn Wheat Soybean meal Wheat bran Composition of the feedstuffs Dry matter 87. 03 87. 46 89. 28 87. 81 Crude fiber 2. 51 2. 27 6. 19 12. 49 Total dietary fiber 7. 85 14. 69 29. 31 47. 86 Insoluble dietary fiber 6. 96 11. 51 22. 59 42. 18 Soluble dietary fiber 1. 21 3. 26 5. 78 5. 84 / SDF /TDF 14. 81 22. 07 20. 37 12. 16 NSP Alkali extracted NSP 8. 37 16. 48 36. 14 50. 53 NSP Composition of the alkali extracted NSP Dry matter 92. 09 91. 84 92. 67 93. 18 Crude protein 1. 47 2. 16 15. 45 2. 39 NSP 90. 36 89. 57 77. 29 90. 78 Crude fiber 16. 04 11. 83 19. 37 20. 71 Total dietary fiber 91. 56 89. 74 73. 06 91. 59 Insoluble dietary fiber 80. 33 69. 09 58. 82 83. 41 Soluble dietary fiber 9. 89 20. 16 16. 15 8. 23 / SDF /IDF 10. 96 22. 59 21. 54 8. 98 2. 2 2 3 24 h NDO SCFA NSP NSP SCFA NDO NDO SCFA NSP 24 h NDO 6 h SCFA P < 0. 05 SCFA P < 0. 05 24 h SCFA 6 h 12 h SCFA 50% 24 h SCFA 83. 81% 75. 84% 6 12 24 h SCFA 23. 81% 18. 90% 40. 94% 4 NDO

348 34 Tab. 2 2 6 12 24 h Short - chain fatty acid production after onset of 6 12 and 24 hours fermentation of various NDO or NSP by caecal microflora in broilers mmol /g DM Acetate mmol /g DM Propionate Stachyose 1. 02 ± 0. 16 e 2. 01 ± 0. 42 d 3. 83 ± 0. 58 e 0. 38 ± 0. 10 d 0. 65 ± 0. 20 c 1. 77 ± 0. 60 c Raffinose 1. 42 ± 0. 17 f 3. 89 ± 0. 34 e 4. 66 ± 0. 72 f 1. 07 ± 0. 11 e 1. 83 ± 0. 20 d 1. 90 ± 0. 09 c FOS 0. 73 ± 0. 13 d 1. 61 ± 0. 34 d 3. 29 ± 0. 52 e 0. 26 ± 0. 04 c 0. 98 ± 0. 18 d 1. 71 ± 0. 26 c MOS 0. 47 ± 0. 08 c 0. 83 ± 0. 30 bc 2. 05 ± 0. 06 d 0. 13 ± 0. 02 b 0. 33 ± 0. 09 a 0. 87 ± 0. 06 b NSP Corn NSP 0. 25 ± 0. 05 ab 0. 66 ± 0. 11 bc 1. 26 ± 0. 18 bc 0. 04 ± 0. 01 a 0. 09 ± 0. 02 a 0. 20 ± 0. 05 a NSP Wheat NSP 0. 39 ± 0. 05 bc 1. 08 ± 0. 30 c 1. 77 ± 0. 11 cd 0. 08 ± 0. 02 ab 0. 18 ± 0. 02 ab 0. 41 ± 0. 03 a NSP Wheat bran NSP 0. 22 ± 0. 08 ab 0. 53 ± 0. 03 ab 0. 91 ± 0. 19 ab 0. 03 ± 0. 01 a 0. 05 ± 0. 01 a 0. 13 ± 0. 04 a NSP Soybean meal NSP 0. 27 ± 0. 06 ab 0. 73 ± 0. 16 bc 1. 26 ± 0. 06 bc 0. 05 ± 0. 01 a 0. 11 ± 0. 04 a 0. 28 ± 0. 03 a Cellulose 0. 20 ± 0. 05 a 0. 16 ± 0. 03 a 0. 36 ± 0. 08 a 0. 03 ± 0. 03 a 0. 03 ± 0. 02 a mmol /g DM Butyrate SCFA mmol /g DM TSCFA Stachyose 0. 13 ± 0. 01 b 0. 23 ± 0. 05 c 1. 32 ± 0. 18 c 1. 52 ± 0. 26 e 2. 90 ± 0. 58 d 6. 92 ± 1. 25 e Raffinose 0. 26 ± 0. 05 c 1. 04 ± 0. 22 d 1. 70 ± 0. 37 d 2. 75 ± 0. 12 f 6. 76 ± 0. 52 e 8. 26 ± 0. 58 f FOS 0. 04 ± 0. 01 a 0. 17 ± 0. 03 bc 1. 26 ± 0. 19 c 1. 02 ± 0. 16 d 2. 77 ± 0. 55 d 6. 26 ± 0. 94 e MOS 0. 06 ± 0. 01 a 0. 12 ± 0. 06 ab 0. 46 ± 0. 08 b 0. 66 ± 0. 09 c 1. 28 ± 0. 44 bc 3. 38 ± 0. 08 d NSP Corn NSP 0. 02 ± 0. 01 a 0. 08 ± 0. 03 a 0. 14 ± 0. 02 a 0. 32 ± 0. 04 ab 0. 84 ± 0. 15 b 1. 60 ± 0. 20 bc NSP Wheat NSP 0. 05 ± 0. 01 a 0. 21 ± 0. 05 c 0. 37 ± 0. 05 ab 0. 52 ± 0. 07 bc 1. 46 ± 0. 37 c 2. 55 ± 0. 19 cd NSP Wheat bran NSP 0. 04 ± 0. 05 a 0. 07 ± 0. 01 a 0. 12 ± 0. 04 a 0. 29 ± 0. 13 a 0. 65 ± 0. 04 ab 1. 15 ± 0. 27 ab NSP Soybean meal NSP 0. 03 ± 0. 01 a 0. 11 ± 0. 03 ab 0. 30 ± 0. 03 ab 0. 34 ± 0. 05 ab 0. 95 ± 0. 19 bc 1. 83 ± 0. 11 bc Cellulose 0. 23 ± 0. 05 a 0. 16 ± 0. 03 a 0. 38 ± 0. 07 a P < 0. 05 P > 0. Means in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different P < 0. 05. 3 Tab. 3 6 12 24 h Molar percentage of short - chain fatty acid after onset of 6 12 and 24 hours fermentation of various NDO or NSP by caecal microflora in broilers mol /100 mol Acetate mol /100 mol Propionate mol /100 mol Butyrate Stachyose 66. 80 ± 0. 53 b 69. 40 ± 3. 58 c 55. 56 ± 1. 71 ab 24. 75 ± 2. 07 a 22. 15 ± 2. 61 c 25. 17 ± 4. 21 d 8. 45 ± 1. 64 8. 45 ± 3. 16 ab 19. 27 ± 2. 66 de Raffinose 51. 55 ± 4. 04 a 57. 56 ± 1. 30 a 56. 26 ± 5. 87 ab 38. 93 ± 5. 35 c 27. 16 ± 3. 58 d 23. 08 ± 1. 41 d 9. 52 ± 1. 35 15. 28 ± 2. 34 d 20. 66 ± 4. 60 e FOS 70. 79 ± 1. 72 b 58. 05 ± 0. 86 a 52. 51 ± 0. 66 a 25. 14 ± 0. 82 b 35. 68 ± 0. 76 e 27. 26 ± 0. 99 d 4. 06 ± 1. 23 6. 27 ± 0. 10 a 20. 24 ± 1. 54 de MOS 71. 27 ± 3. 47 b 64. 82 ± 2. 54 b 60. 65 ± 3. 08 b 19. 65 ± 3. 76 ab 26. 00 ± 2. 50 cd 25. 75 ± 1. 11 d 9. 08 ± 0. 38 9. 18 ± 1. 33 ab 13. 59 ± 2. 01 bc NSP Corn NSP 78. 83 ± 4. 96 b 78. 99 ± 1. 11 ef 78. 81 ± 3. 81 d 13. 06 ± 0. 58 ab 11. 25 ± 0. 75 ab 12. 44 ± 2. 57 bc 8. 10 ± 4. 64 9. 76 ± 1. 20 b 8. 75 ± 1. 30 a NSP Wheat NSP 74. 83 ± 3. 67 b 73. 33 ± 3. 13 d 69. 51 ± 1. 15 c 14. 66 ± 3. 06 ab 12. 39 ± 2. 21 b 15. 99 ± 0. 23 c 10. 51 ± 0. 63 14. 29 ± 1. 06 cd 14. 50 ± 1. 03 c NSP Soybean meal NSP 80. 14 ± 8. 37 b 81. 27 ± 0. 71 f 78. 84 ± 2. 39 d 10. 97 ± 3. 66 a 7. 92 ± 0. 07 a 10. 81 ± 1. 28 ab 8. 89 ± 12. 24 10. 81 ± 0. 77 b 10. 35 ± 1. 11 ab NSP Wheat bran NSP 78. 38 ± 6. 51 b 76. 41 ± 2. 42 de 68. 49 ± 1. 14 c 13. 54 ± 3. 22 ab 12. 18 ± 4. 45 ab 15. 01 ± 1. 19 bc 8. 08 ± 3. 35 11. 41 ± 2. 94 bc 16. 51 ± 0. 56 cd Cellulose 87. 24 ± 11. 22 c 100. 00 ± 0. 00 g 92. 32 ± 5. 23 e 12. 76 ± 11. 22 a - 7. 68 ± 5. 23 a - - - P < 0. 05 P > 0. Means in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different P < 0. 05. NSP NSP SCFA NDO NSP 6 12 24 h SCFA NSP 64. 87% 65. 28% 71. 94% NSP NSP NSP 6 12 24 h SCFA NSP 60. 43% 57. 59% 62. 59% 54. 95% 44. 46% 45. 30% 12 24 h SCFA NSP 10. 37% 15. 09% 5 NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP 3

2 NDO NSP 349 2 - VFA 3 NSP NSP NSP NSP VFA 4 1 α - 1 6-2 α - 1 6-1 ~ 3 β - 1 2 NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP 11 NSP NSP NSP 14. 45% Macfarlane 12 SCFA SC- FA NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP SCFA NSP 4 5 NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP NSP 1 Englyst H N Kingman S M Cumming J H. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions J. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992 46 33-50. 2 Flamm G Glinsmann W Kritchevsky D et al. Inulin and oligofructose as diatary fiber A review of the evidence J. Crit Rev in Food Sci Nutr 2001 41 5 353-362. 3. J. 2010 32 3 566-570.

350 34 4 Bedford M. Removal of antibiotic growth promoters from poultry diets implications and strategies to minimize subsequent problems J. World s Poult Sci J 2000 56 347-365. 5 Verstegen M W Williams B A. Alternatives to the use of antibiotics as growth promoters for monogastric animals J. Anim Biotechnol 2002 13 113-127. 6 Choct M Annison G. Anti - nutritive effect of wheat pentosans in broiler chickens roles of viscosity and gut microflora J. Br Poult Sci 1992 33 821-834. 7 Sunvold G D Hhussein H S Jr Fahey G C et al. Reinha. In vitro fermentation of cellulose beet pulp citrus pulp and citrus pectin using fecal inoculum from cats dogs horses humans and pigs and ruminal fluid from cattle J. J Anim Sci 1995 73 3639-3648. 8 Lee S C Porsky L De Vries J W. Determination of total soluble and insoluble dietary fiber in foods - enzymatic - gravimentric method MES - TRIS buffer collaborative study J. J AOAC Int 1992 75 3 395-416. 9. M. 3. 2007. 10 Carre B Gomez J Chagneau A M. Contribution of oligosaccharide and polysaccharide digestion and excreta losses of lactic acid and short chain fatty acids to dietary metabolizable energy values in broiler chickens and adult cockerels J. Br Poult Sci 1995 36 4 611-29. 11 Schneeman B O. Soluble V S. insoluble fiber - different physiological responses J. Food Technol 1987 41 81-82. 12 Macfarlane G T Allison C Gibson S A W et al. Contribution of the microflora to proteolysis in the human large intestine J. J App Bacteriology 1988 64 37-46. 櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗櫗 328 3. J. 2011 33 4 696-700. 4. J. 2004 26 5 675-680. 5. J. 2007 4 53-55. 6 Bagnall C R. Species identification among pollen grains of Abies Picea and Pinus in the Rocky Mountain A scanning electron microscope study J. Rev Palaeobotany Palynology 1975 19 203-220. 7 Erdtman G. Handbook of palynology - an introduction to the study of pollen grains and spores J. Copenhagen Munksgaard 1969. 8. M. 2. 1995. 9. J. 2009 38 3 133-136. 10. 5 J. 2008 44 10 159-163. 11. 15 J. 2005 2 56-57. 12. 5 J. 2006 34 5 153-156. 13. J. 2007 4 29-30. 14. J. 2011 33 3 242-246. 15. J. 2009 29 4 10-12. 16. 4 J. 2011 25 1 70-73. 17. J. 1993 70 2 60-62. 18. J. 2010 37 6 18-21. 19. M. 1983 21-32. 20. M. 1991 4 36-37. 21. J. 2007 34 6 12-14. 22. Camellia japonica L. J. 2008 21 4 1078-1080. 23. J. 2008 26 1 78-80. 24 Donald E Stone. Pollen size in hickories Carya J. National Science Foundation Grant No. G -17603 1963 15 6 208-215.