How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting

Similar documents
Culprit PCI vs MultiVessel PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Approach to Multi Vessel disease with STEMI

Cindy L. Grines MD FACC FSCAI

STEMI AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY DISEASE

FFR-guided Complete vs. Culprit Only Revascularization in AMI Patients Ki Hong Choi, MD On Behalf of FRAME-AMI Investigators

Complete Revascularization: The Future Mode of Revascularization in STEMI

Controversies In STEMI Management

Fine-tuning treatment for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Non merci! Revascularisation complète à la phase aigue de l infarctus? 8 e Cardiorun, La Réunion, 1 er octobre Gilles Rioufol, MD, PhD

Expert Opinion on Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Full Revascularisation of ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

What do the guidelines say?

Trial Update- TOTAL. Jonathan Byrne

Two year results of COMPARE-ACUTE Randomised trial of FFR-guided complete revascularization versus infarct artery only treatment in

STEMI update. Vijay Krishnamoorthy M.D. Interventional Cardiology

Research Article. Keywords: Preventive revascularization STEMI; Primary PCI; Multivessel coronary artery disease; Zotarolimus-eluting stents

ROLE OF CORONARY PRESSURE & FFR IN MULTIVESSEL DISEASE

Unprotected LM intervention

Fractional Flow Reserve: Review of the latest data

Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

Relations of Interest

The top 5 trials in the last year: Ischemic Heart Disease

What is new in the Treatment of STEMI? Malcolm R. Bell, MBBS Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

Διάρκεια διπλής αντιαιμοπεταλιακής αγωγής. Νικόλαος Γ.Πατσουράκος Καρδιολόγος, Επιμελητής Α ΕΣΥ Τζάνειο Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Πειραιά

Treatment Options for Angina

Physiological Lesion Assessment in STEMI and Other Acute Coronary Syndromes

Rafał Wolny, Jerzy Pręgowski, Paweł Bekta, Zbigniew Chmielak, Adam Witkowski

Complete Versus Culprit Only Revascularization in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction-a Perspective on Recent Trials and Recommendations

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

CABG vs PCI: What do the Guidelines Say?

FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE: STANDARD OF CARE

Critical Review Form Therapy Objectives: Methods:

Management of cardiovascular disease - coronary interventions -

Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes

C. W. Hamm, B. Cremers, H. Moellmann, S. Möbius-Winkler, U. Zeymer, M. Vrolix, S. Schneider, U. Dietz, M. Böhm, B. Scheller

Coronary Artery Disease: Revascularization (Teacher s Guide)

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Coronary Physiology the current state of play

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Lecture fees: AstraZeneca, Ely Lilly, Merck.

Pharmaco-Invasive Approach for STEMI

Left Main Intervention: Where are we in 2015?

Benefit of Performing PCI Based on FFR

CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

TCT mdbuyline.com Clinical Trial Results Summary

FFR Incorporating & Expanding it s use in Clinical Practice

FFR in Multivessel Disease

Evaluating Clinical Risk and Guiding management with SPECT Imaging

Pathology of percutaneous interventions (PCI) in coronary arteries. Allard van der Wal, MD.PhD; Pathologie AMC, Amsterdam, NL

FFR and CABG Emanuele Barbato, MD, PhD, FESC Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Belgium

How to do Primary Angioplasty. - Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

Target vessel only revascularization versus complet revascularization in non culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI

Updated and Guideline Based Treatment of Patients with STEMI

Medical Rx vs PCI vs CABG

Management of stable CAD FFR guided therapy: the new gold standard

Lessons learned From The National PCI Registry

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cindy Baker, MD FACC Director Peripheral Vascular Interventions Division of Cardiovascular Medicine

Clopidogrel Date: 15 July 2008

Controversies in Coronary Revascularization. Atlanta CCU April 15, 2016

Surgery Grand Rounds

Management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction Update 2009 Late comers: which options?

Impact of Thromboaspiration during Primary PCI on infarcted segmental myocardial function: a Tissue Doppler imaging evaluation. EXPIRA Trial substudy.

PCI for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: What Happened in the Last Week?

FAME STUDY: 2-year Follow-Up & CLINICAL SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

Emergency surgery in acute coronary syndrome

Asian AMI Registry Session The 17 th Joint Meeting of Coronary Revascularization (JCR 2017) Busan, Korea Dec 8 th 2017

Coronary stenting: the appropriate use of FFR

PCIs on Intermediate Lesions NCDR Cath-PCI Registry

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

CORONARY CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSIONS IN THE SETTING OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Coronary Plaque Sealing: The DEFER Study and more...

Master Class in Preventive Cardiology Focus on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Geneva April

VCU Pauley Heart Center: A 2009 US News Top 50 Heart and Heart Surgery Hospital

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

Supplementary Table S1: Proportion of missing values presents in the original dataset

Acute Coronary Syndromes

R&M Solutions

Myocardial Infarction In Dr.Yahya Kiwan

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease: a focus on physiology

KCS Congress: Impact through collaboration

Coronary artery disease (CAD): Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) for Pilots Risk Assessment. B. Haaff, R. Quast

Advances in Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. No disclosure or conflicts. Outline

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

Controversies in Cardiac Surgery

Cardiogenic Shock. Carlos Cafri,, MD

La FFR quoi d autre: En pratique? Pierre Deharo, CHU TIMONE, Marseille

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

STEMI ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

COURAGE to Leave Diseased Arteries Alone

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Imaging ischemic heart disease: role of SPECT and PET. Focus on Patients with Known CAD

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

Is it safe to discharge patients 24 hours after uncomplicated successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Culprit lesion-only versus complete revascularization in patients with STEMI: Lessons learned from PRAMI, CvLPRIT, and DANAMI-3 PRIMULTI

Can We Safely Defer PCI. Yes, already proven

Acute coronary syndromes

Case Report Left Main Stenosis. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG)?

Intervention: How and to which extent is technology helping us?

Transcription:

How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting Ahmed A A Suliman, MBBS, FACP, FESC Associate Professor, University of Khartoum Interventional Cardiologist, Shan Teaching Hospital Khartoum, Sudan

Introduction In patients with ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion is the treatment of choice. Approximately 50% of patients with STEMI have multivessel disease Goldstein JA et al. Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. NEJM. 2000 It has been shown that such patients have a worse outcome compared to patients with single vessel disease Sorajja P et al. Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. EHJ. 2007

What to do with the non infarct related artery (N-IRA)? Open everything. Open is better

Preventive PCI concept: The COURAGE trial tested the hypothesis in stable angina and failed. Multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial N=2,287 PCI plus OMT (n=1,149) OMT alone (n=1,138) Setting: 50 centers in US and Canada Enrollment: June 1999 to January 2004 Median follow-up: 4.6 years Analysis: Intention-to-treat Primary outcome: Composite of death from any cause and nonfatal MI 19% vs. 18.5% (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.87-1.27; P=0.62)

PRAMI ( Preventive Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction) Multicenter, prospective, randomized, single blinded trial N=465 Preventative PCI (n=234) No preventative PCI (n=231) Setting: 5 centers in the UK Enrollment: 2008-2013 (stopped early) Mean follow-up: 23 months Analysis: Intention-to-treat Primary outcome: CV mortality, nonfatal MI, or refractory angina

Breakdown of PRAMI results CV mortality + non-fatal MI + refractory angina

Non IRA intervention in PRAMI The location of non-culprit segment not reported. At least an extra stent used An extra 100 cc of dye per patient ( 300 cc vs 200cc)

CvLPRIT trial Multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-comparator trial N=296 Target lesion-only revascularization (N=146) Complete revascularization (N=150) Setting: 7 UK centers Enrollment: May 2011 - May 2014 Duration of follow-up: 12 months Analysis: Intention-to-treat Primary outcome: MACE (death, nonfatal MI, heart failure, repeat revascularization) Gershlick AH et al. JACC. 2015;65:963-72.

CvLPRIT results Included patients with 70 % ( or 50% on two views) None of the individual endpoints was significant including mortality

CvLPRIT revisited

CvLPRIT revisited N-IRA : LMS + pla D < 20% in both arms

DANAMI3- PRIMULTI TRIAL PROGRAM 2239 STEMI < 12 hours Randomise conventional PPCI, ipost, defer stenting 2212 Successful infarct related artery PCI 627 Multivessel disease (>50% stenosis in non IRA > 2 mm suitable for PCI) Randomise 313 IRA PCI only 314 FFR guided complete revascularisation

Individual components of primary endpoint Composite Revascularisation Non fatal MI All cause death

DANAMI3-PRIMULTI

DANAMI3-PRIMULTI IRA only (n = 313) Complete revascularisation (n = 314) HR [95% CI] p Primary endpoint 68 (22%) 40 (13%) 0 56 [0 38 0 83] 0 004 All-cause death 11 (4%) 15 (5%) 1 4 [0 63 3 0] 0 43 Nonfatal MI 16 (5%) 15 (5%) 0 94 [0 47 1 9] 0 87 Ischemia-driven revascularisation* 52 (17%) 17 (5%) 0 31 [0 18 0 53] <0 001 Secondary endpoints Cardiac death 9 (3%) 5 (2%) 0 56 [0 19 1 7] 0 29 Cardiac death or nonfatal MI 25 (8%) 20 (6%) 0 80 [0 45 1 45] 0 47 Urgent PCI 18 (6%) 7 (2%) 0 38 [0 16 0 92] 0 03 Non-urgent PCI 27 (9%) 8 (3%) 0 29 [0 13 0 63] 0 002 * PCI or CABG

Procedural data ( DANAMI3-PRIMULTI) IRA only (n = 313) Complete revascularisation (n = 314) P Procedure duration (min) 42 (31 59) 76 (56 100) <0 0001 Contrast volume (ml) 170 (125 220) 280 (215 365) <0 0001 Fluoroscopy dose (Gycm 2 ) 49 (33 74) 77 (52 115) <0 0001 Number of arteries treated per patient 1 (1 2) 2 (1 3) <0 0001 Number of implanted stents 1 (1 1) 2 (1 3) <0 0001 Stent diameter (mm) 3 5 (2 75 3 5) 3 0 (2 75 3 5) 0 005 Total stent length (mm) 18 (15 28) 33 (18 51) <0 0001 Stent type 0 5 No stenting 18 (6%) 12 (4%) Bare-metal 5 (2%) 3 (1%) Drug-eluting 290 (93%) 298 (96%) Use of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor 72 (23%) 64 (20%) 0 4 Use of Bivalirudin 234 (75%) 237 (76%) 0 8

Multivessel Coronary Disease Diagnosed at the Time of Primary PCI for STEMI: Complete Revascularization Versus Conservative Strategy. PRAGUE - 13 Trial Inclusion Criteria: Patient with acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation (STEMI) Angiographically successful primary PCI of infarct-related stenosis (TIMI flow grades II-III) One or more other stenoses ( 70%) of "non-infarct" coronary artery (arteries) found by coronary angiography, (diameter of artery 2,5mm) Enrollment 48 hours following onset of symptoms Exclusion Criteria: Stenosis of the left main of left coronary artery 50% Hemodynamically significant valvular disease Patients in cardiogenic shock during STEMI Hemodynamic instability Angina pectoris > grade 2 CCS lasting 1 month prior to STEMI

Three centers in Czech Republic 213 patients enrolled No difference between two arms in primary composite endpoints (or its individual elements)

2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization

2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on Primary PCI for Patients with STEMI COR LOE Recommendation IIb B-R PCI of a noninfarct artery may be considered in selected patients with STEMI and multivessel disease who are hemodynamically stable, either at the time of primary PCI or as a planned staged procedure. 1 1. Modified recommendation from 2013 Guideline (changed class from III: Harm to IIb and expanded time frame in which multivessel PCI could be performed).

CULPRIT SHOCK trial Multicenter, open-label, randomized trial N=706. Culprit lesion-only PCI (n=351); Immediate multivessel PCI (n=355) 83 centers in Europe Duration of follow-up: 30 days Primary Outcome: Death from any cause or severe renal failure leading to renal replacement therapy Thiele. NEJM 2017

Final results

What do you think is the best strategy in Africa?