Czech CRC screening program at the point of switch to the population based design

Similar documents
Practical challenges in establishing and running the Czech national colorectal cancer screening programme

INTERACTION WITH SCREENEES AND PATIENT ORGANIZATIONS

Lessons learnt from cancer screening programmes as an example for establishing the Czech National Coordination Centre

CRC screening from the viewpoint of its clients and patients results of survey

Primary care at the forefront of colorectal cancer screening

COLORECTAL CANCER: A CHALLENGE FOR HEALTHY LIFESTYLE, SCREENING AND PROPER CARE

EuropaColon Uniting citizens in the fight against colorectal cancer. Zorana Maravic Director of Group Development May, 2013

Measuring performance and quality indicators of CRC screening

4th EUROPEAN COLORECTAL CANCER DAYS

Quantitative immunochemical tests: evidence on accuracy and implementation considerations in the Czech MUDr.. Petr Kocna, CSc.

Efficacy, effectiveness, quality: sources of data

Implementing of Population-based FOBT Screening

3rd EUROPEAN COLORECTAL CANCER DAYS: BRNO 2014 PREVENTION AND SCREENING

The Dutch bowel cancer screening program Relevant lessions for Ontario

GENERAL PRACTITIONERS IN THE 1ST LINE OF CANCER PREVENTION

Additional Information to the Press Release

Colorectal cancer screening in England

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Monitoring of equity in access to CRC screening and CRC care: two sides of the same coin

Programme September 2017 Prague, Czech Republic

Colorectal Cancer Screening State of the art in Eastern Europe. Mārcis Leja Prague, September 27, 2017

Best practices in collecting and processing data in CRC screening and after it

Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests

The burden of Colorectal Cancer in Asia. Dr Saunthari Somasundaram

Cervical cancer screening in Norway

Performance of Colorectal cancer screening in the European Union Member States Data from the second European screening report

Cancer Screening in the European Union Second Report: Colorectal cancer Screening

The choice of methods for Colorectal Cancer Screening; The Dutch experience

Dr Alasdair Patrick. Dr Nagham Al-Mozany. 9:45-10:10 Where Are We Up To With Bowel Cancer Screening?

Reflections on the EUnetHTA CRC screening full Core Model pilot 1

Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Wyoming. Allie Bain, MPH Outreach & Education Supervisor Wyoming Integrated Cancer Services Program

Cancer Prevention and Treatment

Efforts in Fighting against Cancer in Croatia Have to be Focused on the Primary Health Care

Trends in Participation Rates for the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea,

Be it Resolved that FIT is the Best Way to Screen for Colorectal Cancer DEBATE

An Update on the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Natasha Djedovic, London Hub Director 17 th September 2018

Prof Stephen P. Halloran. Update on the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Focus on BS & FIT

Cost-effectiveness of an early awareness campaign for colorectal cancer

Global colorectal cancer screening appropriate or practical? Graeme P Young, Flinders University WCC, Melbourne

Disparities in influenza vaccination coverage rates in health care workers and the ways to overcome the barriers

State of the Art of Rare Disease Activities in EU Member States and Other European Countries. Slovak Republic Report

European Cancer Network Aims and Activities

The 2003 Council Recommendation on Cancer Screening and the European Initiative on Breast Cancer

Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Inadomi J M

The initiative Better food for patients National guidelines Accreditation of all Danish hospitals regarding undernutrition.

IARC Handbook Volume 17: Colorectal Cancer Screening. Béatrice Lauby-Secretan, PhD on behalf of the IARC Working Group for Volume 17

The New Grade A: USPSTF Updated Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines, What does it all mean?

Screening & Surveillance Guidelines

Cancer Prevention and Control, Client-Oriented Screening Interventions: Mass Media Cervical Cancer (2008 Archived Review)

ColonCancerCheck (CCC): Modelling FOBT screening in Ontario for colorectal cancer (CRC) using the Cancer Risk Management Model (CRMM)

ColonCancerCheck Program Report

Pathology in Slovenian CRC screening programme:

Page 1. Cancer Screening for Women I have no conflicts of interest. Overview. Breast, Colon, and Lung Cancer. Jeffrey A.

Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Pathways. Version 4 1 st October 2013

WEO CRC SC Meeting. Barcelona, Spain October 23, 2015

Cancer Prevention and Control, Client-Oriented Screening Interventions: Reducing Structural Barriers Cervical Cancer (2008 Archived Review)

Are you ready for the Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot Programme?

Links of Care Building Linkages to Specialty Care for Community Health Centers

Corporate Presentation Fourth Quarter 2017

Faecal testing in colorectal cancer screening: State of the Art. Prof Stephen P. Halloran

EuropaColon Expands into Digestive Cancers Europe. Our objective is to save an additional 250,000 Europeans every year

Improving Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer: The Science of Screening. Colorectal Cancer (CRC)

NATIONAL CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME Monitor 2017

Citation for published version (APA): Wijkerslooth de Weerdesteyn, T. R. (2013). Population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy

Colorectal Cancer Screening: State of the Science

Bowel cancer screening and prevention

Results from 2.6 million invitations between : 54% overall uptake (von Wagner et al., 2011)

Colorectal cancer screening

EUROCHIP-II FINAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT ANNEX 08 REPORT OF ESTONIA

RESEARCH COMMUNICATION. Overview of the National Cancer Screening Programme and the Cancer Screening Status in Korea

Diagnostics for the early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer.

Fact sheet on bowel cancer screening programme

% by 2018 Partners Survey Highlights. Emily Bell, MPH Associate Director, National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable American Cancer Society

Institut national de santé publique du Québec

Cancer Screening Program in GEORGIA

European Partnership for Screening

Wagida A. Anwar, M.D. Department of Community, Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Transition to Fecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT)

Blue Star Sunday. Increasing Awareness About Colon Cancer. Dear Faith Community,

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Colorectal Cancer & Screening 1 st Men s Health Conference

SLOVAK BEER AND MALT ASSOCIATION RESPONSIBILITY DAY

Project Culmination Summary

Breast cancer screening programme: France. Dr. Rosemary Ancelle-Park Department of health Office for chronic diseases

Latest Endoscopic Guidelines for FAP, HNPCC, IBD, and the General Population

HPV vaccination policies in Slovenia

Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) for Screening and Symptomatic Patients

Learning and Earning with Gateway Professional Education CME/CEU Webinar Series

EU Guidelines for quality assurance in organization, implementation and monitoring of colorectal cancer screening programme. Jožica Maučec Zakotnik

Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Why it s not as easy as you ve been told

Report to Health and Wellbeing Board on Population Based Adult and Cancer Screening Programmes in Barnet

The effectiveness of telephone reminders and SMS messages on compliance with colorectal cancer screening: an open-label, randomized controlled trial

Debate: General surveillance/screening for colon cancer in a resource constrained environment is imperative

Vascular checks a vascular risk assessment and management. Heather White Deputy Branch Head Vascular Programme

(Bowel) Cancer Screening an update. Mike Hulme-Moir Colorectal Surgeon CD NZ Bowel Screening Pilot

CANCER SCREENING. Er Chaozer Department of General Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital

FIT Kit Pilot. Regence InSure FIT Colorectal Cancer Screening

Cost-effectiveness analysis of immunochemical occult blood screening for colorectal cancer among three fecal sampling methods Yamamoto M, Nakama H

CRC screening in the Era of informatics: can data-based knowledge enhance coverage?

Transcription:

Military University Hospital First Medical Faculty of Charles University Department of Gastroenterology Czech CRC screening program at the point of switch to the population based design M. Zavoral, S. Suchanek, O. Majek, B. Seifert, L. Dusek European Colorectal Cancer Days II: Brno 2013 Prevention and Screening 26 27 April 2013, Brno

Programme involvement 2000: programme launched GPs, biennial gfobt colonoscopy in positives 2006: preventive colonoscopies database on-line database, data quality control 2009: new program design introduced screening colonoscopy, FIT, gynecologists 2013: programme update switch to population based programme gfobt abandoned FIT only 2

Actual programme design asymptomatic individuals: age 50-54: FIT annually age 55: FIT biannually screening colonoscopy in 10 years interval 3

Programme organization Centers for screening colonoscopy Board for CRC screening of the CGS Commission for CRC screening of the Ministry of Health 4

Centers for screening colonoscopy nationwide network 225 GE units available, 160 involved (71%) strict quality control of colonoscopy minimum of preventive colonoscopies: 50 per year accreditation and audits of the Ministry of Health 5

Council for CRC screening regional coordinators of gastroenterology representatives of professional societies (GP, CGPS, CSKB, SGO) and IBA programme monitoring provides expert recommendations to the Commission for CRC screening MH 6

Commission for CRC screening executive authority chairman: Deputy of Minister of Health representatives of professional societies, Ministry of Health, Health Insurance Companies approves the Centers for screening colonoscopy provides recommendations to Advisory Board of Minister of Health (minister, first deputy, economic deputy) consensus of all members required and necessary 7

Programme positive influence epidemiologic characteristics decrease of CRC mortality increase of early stage CRC diagnosed increase of target population participation 8

CRC incidence and mortality 2000 2009 Difference Incidence 7 456 8 265 + 800 Mortality 4 506 3 991-515 Source: Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic Prevalence 2010 No. % Stadium I 17 077 31% Stadium II 16 287 30% Stadium III 11 412 21% Stadium IV 7 243 13% Stadium unknown 2 983 5% Total 55 002 100% 9

Detection of early stage cancers 2000 2010 Trend Stage I 15.6 % 23.3 % Stage II 26.9 % 24.0 % Stage III 17.0 % 23.8 % Stage IV 22.5 % 23.0 % Stage unknown 17.9 % 5.8 % Source: Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic 10

Target population overall coverage CRC screening coverage FOBT + screening colonoscopy: target population 3.8 mil individuals Year Source: National Reference Centre identification and organized personal invitation of target population EU Recommendation: accepted coverage: 45% recommended coverage: 65% European CRC Screening Guidelines, 2010 11

Issues to be solved: FOBT increase of FOBT positivity gfobt: not used since 2013 FIT: various tests allowed qualitative (GPs and gynecologists' office) quantitative (biochemical laboratory) discussion of suitable test adequate reimbursement negotiation 12

Issues to be solved: opportunistic programme Number of individuals with procedure 527 470 222 270 43 300 Year maximum impact of opportunistic programme reached, stagnation in: FOBTs and colonoscopies performed adenomas and cancer diagnosed Source: National Reference Centre 13

Year Patients with colonoscopy Programme basic results Patients with detected adenoma Proportion Patients with detected cancer Proportion 2006 5 335 1 578 29,6% 335 6,3% 2007 5 680 1 635 28,8% 337 5,9% 2008 7 457 2 367 31,7% 446 6,0% 2009 13 074 4 123 31,5% 623 4,8% 2010 22 727 7 311 32,2% 872 3,8% 2011 24 704 8 294 33,6% 775 3,1% 2012 24 800 8 557 34,5% 756 3,0% 2013* 1 858 588 31,6% 44 2,4% Celkem 105 635 34 453 32,6% 4 188 4,0% * Preliminary results (March 2012) Source: CRC screening database 14

Population based programme nationwide project supported by EU 3 screening programmes: CRC, mamma, cervix 2 parts: organized individual invitation health insurance companies databases target population selection (already set up) letter with programmes explanation, recommendations reminders massive media campaign (TV, radio, newspapers) start: second half of 2013 15

Conclusion Immunochemical FOBT is now the only FOBT used Target population participation has been continuously rising, reaching the 25% level Further increase is possible by switch to population based screening Organized individual invitation is prepared to be started in the second half of 2013 16