surtout qui n est PAS à risque?

Similar documents
Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

New Guidelines in Dyslipidemia Management

2003 World Health Organization (WHO) / International Society of Hypertension (ISH) Statement on Management of Hypertension.

Landmesser U et al. Eur Heart J 2017; /eurheartj/ehx549

Antiplatelet Therapy in Primary CVD Prevention and Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Καρακώστας Γεώργιος Διευθυντής Καρδιολογικής Κλινικής, Γ.Ν.

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

2016 EUROPEAN GUIDELINES ON CVD PREVENTION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Traitements associés chez l hypertendu: Statines, Aspirine

Treatment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Kevin M Hayes D.O. F.A.C.C. First Coast Heart and Vascular Center

Which CVS risk reduction strategy fits better to carotid US findings?

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

New Guidelines in Dyslipidemia Management

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

The Diabetes Link to Heart Disease

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

How would you manage Ms. Gold

Cardiovascular risk reduction in diabetes Lipids (NICE CG181)

Dyslipidaemia. Is there any new information? Dr. A.R.M. Saifuddin Ekram

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE General practice Indicators for the NICE menu

1. Albuminuria an early sign of glomerular damage and renal disease. albuminuria

Fasting or non fasting?

The earlier BP control the better cardiovascular outcome. Jin Oh Na Cardiovascular center Korea University Medical College

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Prevention of MACROvascular Complications of Diabetes

9/29/2015. Primary Prevention of Heart Disease: Objectives. Objectives. What works? What doesn t?

Early Detection of Damaged Organ

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

Vascular disease. Structural evaluation of vascular disease. Goo-Yeong Cho, MD, PhD Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension - Pocket Guide Update 2004 Revision July 2005

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 6 October 2010

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

Diabetes Mellitus: A Cardiovascular Disease

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL MEDICINE WELCOMES

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

Review current guideline recommendations for lipid-lowering therapy

T. Suithichaiyakul Cardiomed Chula

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

Complications of Diabetes: Screening and Prevention

Management of Hypertension

- Lecture - Recommandations ESC : messages importants P. MEYER (Saint Laurent du Var) - Controverse - Qui doit faire l'angioplastie périphérique?

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

ROLE OF INFLAMMATION IN HYPERTENSION. Dr Barasa FA Physician Cardiologist Eldoret

Macrovascular Disease in Diabetes

No relevant financial relationships

Supplement materials:

Blood Pressure Targets in Diabetes

Association between arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk factors in a pediatric population

7 th Munich Vascular Conference

CHALLENGES OF HYPERTENSION IN THE COALFACE

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

Hypertension targets: sorting out the confusion. Brian Rayner, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Cape Town

Workshop. Todd Anderson MD / Jacques Genest MD

Disclosures. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management. Learning Objectives. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Best Medical Therapy for asymptomatic carotid disease

CARDIOMETABOLIC SYNDROME

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

4/7/ The stats on heart disease. + Deaths & Age-Adjusted Death Rates for

Lessons from Recent Atherosclerosis Trials


A: Epidemiology update. Evidence that LDL-C and CRP identify different high-risk groups

Felix Vallotton Ball (1899) LDL-C management in Asian diabetes: moderate vs. high intensity statin --- a lesson from EMPATHY study

Correlation of novel cardiac marker

Psoriasi e rischio CV

Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials

CVD Risk Assessment. Michal Vrablík Charles University, Prague Czech Republic

Preventing Cardiovascular Disease Stroke Primary Prevention Guidelines. John Potter Professor Ageing & Stroke Medicine University of East Anglia

New Strategies for Lowering LDL - Are They Really Worth It?

Primary Prevention of Stroke

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease- The Challenge in patients with diabetes

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials

Συμπεράσματα από τις νέες μελέτες για την αρτηριακή υπέρταση (SPRINT,PATHAY 2,HOPE 3)

51 e CONGRES DE L A.M.U.B.

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

The Latest Generation of Clinical

Dapagliflozin and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from DECLARE-TIMI 58

Protecting the heart and kidney: implications from the SHARP trial

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2017: Focus on Complications

Central pressures and prediction of cardiovascular events in erectile dysfunction patients

AIM HIGH for SATURN and stay SHARP; COURAGE (v1.5)

Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

How to Reduce CVD Complications in Diabetes?

Preclinical Detection of CAD: Is it worth the effort? Michael H. Crawford, MD

2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines on the Assessment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk: Overview and Commentary

SIGN 149 Risk estimation and the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Quick Reference Guide July Evidence

Cardiovascular Diseases in CKD

Nephrology Unit- CHU Liège- Ulg- Belgium

Hypertension in 2015: SPRINT-ing ahead of JNC-8. MAJ Charles Magee, MD MPH FACP Director, WRNMMC Hypertension Clinic

CVD Prevention, Who to Consider

CARDIO-RENAL SYNDROME

Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) - 3 Combined Lipid Lowering and Blood Pressure Lowering in Moderate Risk People

LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

Case Study: Chris Arden. Peripheral Arterial Disease

Supplementary Appendix

Transcription:

3*25 min

et surtout qui n est PAS à risque?

2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines 2018 ESC-ESH Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension 28 th ESH Meeting on Hypertension and Cardiovascular protection Barcelona June 2018 NOUVEAU!!!! Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2018, in press

2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines Treatment of CV risk factors associated with hypertension Recommendations Class Level CV risk assessment with the SCORE system is recommended for hypertensive patients who are not already at high or very risk due to established CVD, renal disease, or diabetes. For patients at very high CV risk, statins are recommended to achieve LDL-C levels of < 1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl), or a reduction of 50% if the baseline LDL-C is 1.8 3.5 mmol/l (70 135 mg/dl). For patients at high CV risk, statins are recommended to achieve an LDL-C goal of < 2.6 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) or a reduction of 50% if the baseline LDL-C is 2.6 5.2 mmol/l (100 200 mg/dl). For patients at low to moderate CV risk, statins should be considered, to achieve an LDL-C value of < 3.0 mmol/l (115 mg/dl). Antiplatelet therapy, in particular low-dose aspirin, is recommended for secondary prevention in hypertensive patients. Aspirin is not recommended for primary prevention in hypertensive patients without CVD. I I I IIa I III B B B C A A Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2018, in press

2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines 10-year CV risk categories (SCORE system) <70 <100 <115 Very high risk High risk Moderate risk Low risk People with any of the following: Documented CVD, either clinical or unequivocal on imaging. Clinical CVD includes; acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, coronary or other arterial revascularization, stroke, TIA, aortic aneurysm, PAD. Unequivocal documented CVD on imaging includes: significant plaque (i.e. 50% stenosis) on angiography or ultrasound. It does not include increase in carotid intima-media thickness. Diabetes mellitus with target organ damage, e.g. proteinuria or a with a major risk factor such as grade 3 hypertension or hypercholesterolaemia Severe CKD (egfr < 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) A calculated 10-year SCORE of 10% People with any of the following: Marked elevation of a single risk factor, particularly cholesterol > 8 mmol/l (> 310 mg/dl) e.g. familial hypercholesterolaemia, grade 3 hypertension (BP 180/110 mmhg) Most other people with diabetes mellitus (except some young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus and without major risk factors, that may be moderate risk) Hypertensive LVH Moderate CKD egfr 30 59 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) A calculated 10-year SCORE of 5 10% People with: A calculated 10-year SCORE of 1% to < 5% Grade 2 hypertension Many middle-aged people belong to this category People with: A calculated 10-year SCORE of < 1% Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2018, in press

2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines Classification of hypertension stages according to BP levels, presence of CV risk factors, HMOD, or comorbidities Hypertension disease staging Other risk factors, HMOD, or disease High-normal SBP 130 139 DBP 85 89 BP (mmhg) grading Grade 1 SBP 140 159 DBP 90 99 Grade 2 SBP 160 179 DBP 100 109 Grade 3 SBP 180 DBP 110 No other risk factors Low risk Low risk Moderate risk High risk Stage 1 (uncomplicated) 1 or 2 risk factors Low risk Moderate risk 3 risk factors Low moderate risk Moderate high risk Moderate high risk High risk High risk High risk Stage 2 (asymptomatic disease) HMOD, CKD grade 3, or diabetes mellitus without organ damage Moderate high risk High risk High risk High very high risk Stage 3 Established CVD, CKD grade 4, or diabetes mellitus with organ damage Very high risk Very high risk Very high risk Very high risk Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2018, in press

2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines And no : HMOD, CKD grade 3, or diabetes mellitus without/with organ damage, established CVD Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2018, in press

2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines Factors influencing CV risk in patients with hypertension - 2 Asymptomatic HMOD Arterial stiffening: Pulse pressure (in older people) 60 mmhg Carotid femoral PWV > 10 m/s ECG LVH Echocardiographic LVH Microalbuminuria or elevated albumin creatinine ratio Moderate CKD with egfr > 30 59 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (BSA) or severe CKD egfr < 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 Ankle brachial index < 0.9 Advanced retinopathy: haemorrhages or exudates, papilloedema Established CV or renal disease Cerebrovascular disease: ischaemic stroke, cerebral haemorrhage, TIA CAD: myocardial infarction, angina, myocardial revascularization Presence of atheromatous plaque on imaging Heart failure, including HFpEF Peripheral artery disease Atrial fibrillation NONE OF THOSE!!! Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2018, in press

2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines Factors influencing CV risk in patients with hypertension - 1 Demographic characteristics and laboratory parameters Sex (men > women) Age Smoking current or past history Total cholesterol and HDL-C Uric acid Diabetes (except some young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus) Overweight or obesity Family history of premature CVD (men aged < 55 years and women aged < 65 years) Family or parental history of early onset hypertension Early onset menopause Sedentary lifestyle (but < 310 mg/dl) Psychosocial and socioeconomic factors Heart rate (resting values > 80 beats per min) IF SBP < 139 mmhg DBP < 89 mmhg THEN MAXIMUM 2 OUT OF THIS LIST + NO Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2018, in press

2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2018, in press

REDUCTION MAXIMALE DE 60%

Clinical Therapeutics Volume 35, Issue 8, August 2013, Pages 1082 1098

PRIMAIRE : DECES CARDIOVASCULAIRES, INFARCTUS MYOCARDIAQUE, HOSPITALISATION POUR ANGINE DE POITRINE INSTABLE OU REVASCULARISATION CORONAIRE revascularisation SECONDAIRE : DECES CARDIOVASCULAIRES, INFARCTUS MYOCARDIQUE, ACCIDENT CEREBROVASCULAIRE

Types of CV Outcomes Endpoint Evolocuma b (N=13,784) Placebo (N=13,780) 3-yr Kaplan-Meier rate HR (95% CI) CV death, MI, or stroke 7.9 No effect 9.9 0.80 (0.73-0.88) Cardiovascular death 2.5 2.4 1.05 (0.88-1.25) Death due to acute MI 0.26 0.32 0.84 (0.49-1.42) Death due to stroke 0.29 0.30 0.94 (0.58-1.54) Other CV death 1.9 1.8 1.10 (0.90-1.35) MI 4.4-2% 6.3 0.73 (0.65-0.82) Stroke 2.2-0,5% 2.6 0.79 (0.66-0.95) Overall, 74 patients would need to be treated over a period of 2 years to prevent a cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. An Academic Research Organization of Brigham and Women s Hospital and Harvard Medical School

ACC.18 Treatment Assignment Post-ACS pa;ents (1 to 12 months) Run-in period of 2 16 weeks on high-intensity or maximum-tolerated dose of atorvasta;n or rosuvasta;n At least one lipid entry criterion met Randomiza>on Alirocumab SC Q2W Placebo SC Q2W Pa;ent and inves;gators remained blinded to treatment and lipid levels for the en;re dura;on of the study Schwartz GG, et al. Am Heart J 2014;168:682-689.e1. 16

ACC.18 A Target Range for LDL-C We azempted to maximize the number of pa;ents in the target range and minimize the number below target by blindly ;tra;ng alirocumab (75 or 150 mg SC Q2W) or blindly switching to placebo. Below target Acceptable range Target range Alirocumab Undesirably high baseline range 0 15 25 50 70 LDL-C (mg/dl) Schwartz GG, et al. Am Heart J 2014;168:682-689.e1. 17

Main Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Hierarchical Tes;ng ACC.18 *Nominal P-value 18

2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2018, in press

TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-alpha; IL-6, interleukin-6; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1; SAA, serum amyloid A From: Peter Libby MD and CANTOS Eur Heart J. 2018;39(17):1504-1505. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy177

Hazard ratios for incident CV events in the JUPITER trial according to achieved concentrations of LDL-C and Hs-CRP after initiation of rosuvastatin therapy. History of myocardial infarction and had a blood level of Hs-CRP > 2 mg/l despite the use of aggressive secondary prevention strategies. Nonfatal myocardial infarction, Nonfatal stroke, or Cardiovascular Death

2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines MERCI POUR VOTRE ATTENTION! Williams, Mancia et al., J Hypertens 2018 and Eur Heart J 2018, in press