TABLE OF CONTENTS. County Grades

Similar documents
California Department of Finance Demographic Research Unit

Proposed changes to immigration laws could cost California jobs, harm public health: Data tables

INTRODUCTION AND TABLE OF CONTENTS... Page 1

The San Francisco Cancer Initiative SF-CAN

Cities and Counties on the Rise

California s Acute Psychiatric Bed Loss January 11, 2018

Introduction. All of the County Health Rankings are based upon this model of population health improvement:

Policy Brief. How Many Incarcerated Individuals Received Psychotropic Medication in California Jails:

California County Asthma Mortality Chart Book

Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis Deaths

2018 RAF % GOALS BY REGION

Demographic Shifts. Table of Contents. Adele M. Hayutin, PhD. Prepared for the California State Library September 2011

Matrix of Strong Local Tobacco Retailer Licensing Ordinances

Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis Deaths

Tobacco Control Evaluation Center Department of Public Health Sciences UC Davis.

Table of Contents. 2 P age. Susan G. Komen

The Host Family Model in THP-Plus

UCLA Recent Work. Title. Permalink. Authors. Publication Date. Children s Exposure to Secondhand Smoke: Nearly One Million Affected in California

Influenza and Pneumonia Deaths California, 2005

Introduction. Institute of Medicine, 2002

California s MAT Expansion Hub and Spoke System: Introduction to the Learning Collaborative

We dedicate this report to our HEROES survivors, patients, and caregivers whose lives have been touched by lung disease

Health Policy Research Brief

Butte County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal

Silver Plan 100%-150% FPL. Member Cost Share. Member Cost Share. Member Cost Share. Deductible Applies. Deductible Applies. Deductible Applies

DATA SUMMARY REPORT REGISTER NO. DS (October 1998)

CWDA AB 12 Re-Entry Contact List Rev. May 24, 2017 Send updates to

Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk

Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk

Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk

Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk

Physician Supply and Distribution in California, 2002

Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk

Mental Health Services Act Prevention and Early Intervention. Sutter-Yuba Mental Health Services Prevention Early Intervention Statewide Projects

Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk

Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Inyo County 2004

Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Imperial County 2004

Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Kern County 2004

Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk

Request for Applications. Regional Opioid Safety Coalitions: Bringing Communities Together to Prevent Overdose Deaths

Language and Communication

Measuring Variations in Private School Enrollment Rates Using ACS Estimates

UCLA Center for Health Policy Research

Income Disparities in Asthma Burden and Care in California

60-DAY NOTICE OF VIOLATION. SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE (d)

Drug Policy Update. Misdemeanor marijuana arrests are skyrocketing. and other California marijuana enforcement disparities

How Do You Know If You re Having a Memory Problem?

Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Santa Cruz County 2004

Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Ventura County 2004

Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Monterey County 2004

Matrix of Strong Local Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing

California Influenza Surveillance Project California Department of Public Health. Influenza Update

2017 County Health Rankings. California

Matrix of Strong Local Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing Ordinances

Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk San Bernardino County 2004

Robin Kipke. Tobacco Control Evaluation Center. Department of Public Health Sciences. UC Davis

SUMMARY: This notice lists the newspapers that will be used by all Ranger Districts, Forests, and the

An Epidemiologic Profile of Women and Children with HIV/AIDS in California

Matrix of Smokefree Housing Authority Policies December 2013

Smokefree Housing Policies. Local California Smokefree Housing Policies: Detailed Analysis September 2015

Report 1. Sample Design. -Short Report- CHIS 2015 Methodology Report Series. December 13, 2016

Influenza and Other Respiratory Diseases Surveillance Report Season

California County ZIP CITY

Asthma in Schools: Results from the California Healthy Kids Survey,

State Targeted Response to the Opioid Crisis. California Strategic Plan

Between 1980 and 2010, the number

Report on Tuberculosis in California, 2012

Health Policy Research Brief

Soda and other sugar-sweetened

Burden of Diabetes in California. California Department of Public Health Chronic Disease Control Branch September 2014

Two Decades of the California Tobacco Control Program: California Tobacco Survey,

PROPOSED CHANGES TO COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT SMOKING IN OUTDOOR DINING AREAS

Local Revenue Measures June 2008

INTRODUCTION CONTENTS CALIFORNIA CANCER FACTS AND FIGURES 2006

2016 CALIFORNIA LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS REGARDING CANNABIS (organized alphabetically by county)

California Health Care Options Program

Release # For Publication: Wednesday, June 21, 2017

California. Cancer Facts & Figures. A sourcebook for planning and implementing programs for cancer prevention and control

Local California Smokefree Housing Policies: Detailed Analysis

BEVERLY HILLS. 9 ê01 STAFF REPORT

UCLA Recent Work. Title Diabetes on the Rise in California. Permalink

Report 2. Data Collection Methods. -Short Report- CHIS 2015 Methodology Report Series. August 17, 2017

Proposition 36: Five Years Later

Local Revenue Measures June 2008

Fluoridation Census SEPTEMBER -1993

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S SMOKING ORDINANCE

List of Municipalities That Restrict Smoking in Recreation Areas

CC-SJSU Equivalent Courses

California Bovine Tuberculosis USAHA October California Department of Food and Agriculture Animal Health Branch

List of Municipalities That Restrict Smoking in Recreation Areas

THE ECONOMIC COSTS OF OVERWEIGHT, OBESITY, AND PHYSICAL INACTIVITY AMONG CALIFORNIA ADULTS 2006

RATING STATE AND LOCAL TOBACCO POLICIES

Rabies Surveillance in California. Annual Report 2012

California. Cancer Facts & Figures. A sourcebook for planning and implementing programs for cancer prevention and control

Taking on the Climate Change Challenge

Dental Blue. for Individuals and Families. Affordable PPO solutions designed to meet your dental needs

whamos t matterst

Dental Blue. for Individuals and Families. It s all about what works for you.

May 5,2008. No Smoking In Certain Outdoor Public Places

Child Abuse Prevention Councils

Transcription:

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 TOP TEN CALIFORNIA CITIES BY POPULATION... 5 TOP OF THE CLASS... 6 CITIES AND COUNTIES ON THE RISE... 9 CALIFORNIA TOBACCO CONTROL BY THE NUMBERS... 11 RAISE YOUR GRADE... 14 LOCAL GRADING METHODOLOGY... 16 County Grades Alameda County... 23 Alpine County... 24 Amador County... 25... 26 Calaveras County... 27 Colusa County... 28 Contra Costa County... 29 Del Norte County... 30 El Dorado County... 31 Fresno County... 32 Glenn County... 33 Humboldt County... 34 Imperial County... 35 Inyo County... 36 Kern County... 37 Kings County... 38 Lake County... 39 Lassen County... 40 Los Angeles County... 41 Madera County... 45 Marin County... 46 Mariposa County... 47 Mendocino County... 48 Merced County... 49 Modoc County... 50 Mono County... 51 Monterey County... 52 Napa County... 53 Nevada County... 54 Orange County... 55 Placer County... 57 Plumas County... 58 Riverside County... 59 Sacramento County... 61 San Benito County... 62 San Bernardino County... 63 San Diego County... 65 San Francisco County... 66 San Joaquin County... 67 San Luis Obispo County... 68 San Mateo County... 69 Santa Barbara County... 70 Santa Clara County... 71 Santa Cruz County... 72 Shasta County... 73 Sierra County... 74 Siskiyou County... 75 Solano County... 76 Sonoma County... 77 Stanislaus County... 78... 79 Tehama County... 80 Trinity County... 81 Tulare County... 82 Tuolumne County... 83 Ventura County... 84 Yolo County... 85 Yuba County... 86 2 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State of Tobacco Control 2014 report tracks progress on key tobacco control policies at the state and federal levels. The report assigns grades to every state in four key areas: secondhand smoke in their place of employment. State of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Grades State of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Grades report is based on a review of county and municipal codes in three key areas smokefree outdoor thousands of youth in California become smokers each year and untold numbers of Californians are tobacco products to youth. The purpose of the State of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Grades report is to increase public knowledge about local laws that protect residents from the deadly toll of tobacco and to encourage local As a lung surgeon on the front lines of patient care, I see daily the impact that tobacco has on the health of residents in my community. The dangerous effects of tobacco use, including the risk of lung cancer, have been well known since the U.S. Surgeon General released its first report 50 years ago. I am excited and proud to see the steps that multiple communities around California have taken to fight tobacco. We cannot allow tobacco to be the number one preventable cause of death for another 50 years. David Tom Cook, MD, FCCP, FACS; American Lung Association in California Governing Board 3

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE REPORT 40 CITIES AND COUNTIES RAISED THEIR GRADES IN 2013 State of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Grades ordinances to restrict smoking in outdoor areas and seven ordinances to require tobacco retailers to obtain SEVEN CITIES IMPROVED THEIR GRADE FROM AN F TO AN A IN AT LEAST ONE POLICY CATEGORY ONE CITY IMPROVED ITS OVERALL GRADE TO AN A FOUR CITIES RAISED THEIR OVERALL GRADE TO A B laws they have implemented are as strong as possible. NUMBER OF OVERALL F S HAS DECREASED protect their residents. Each year, cities and counties across the state take action to protect their citizens by enacting strong policies to better protect children and families from secondhand smoke and tobacco-related disease. State legislators must be willing to follow the example of these communities. The health of every Californian depends upon it. Marsha Ramos, Chair, American Lung Association in California Governing Board Former Mayor, Burbank, California 4 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872

TOP TEN CALIFORNIA CITIES BY POPULATION not increase its grade. San Francisco improved its grade in the area of Smokefree Housing. Below is a table 1. C D F A 2. D D F B 3. C B D B 4. B B C A 5. F D F F 6. C D F A 7. C C D A 8. B B B A 9. F F F F 10. F F F F Each year, over 30,000 children start smoking in California. To protect the health and lives of our youth, communities must take action to make sure they never pick up a cigarette. That is why cities throughout Los Angeles County have passed a tobacco retailer licensing ordinance that ensures that tobacco is kept out of the hands of kids. Los Angeles County and over 30 cities across the county have already passed this type of policy and we hope we can be an example for other communities in the state to take action. - Jonathan Fielding, MD, MPH Los Angeles County Director of Public Health and Health Officer 5

TOP OF THE CLASS ETHNICITY: 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Albany Baldwin Park Berkley Calabasas Compton Contra Costa County Dublin Glendale Marin County Pasadena Richmond San Rafael Santa Clara County Santa Monica South Pasadena Temecula Union City Caucasian African American Asian American The tobacco industry spends millions of dollars targeting its deadly products to our most vulnerable and marginalized populations. That is why we are proud that Berkeley s long commitment to regulating access to tobacco and secondhand smoke protections now extends to ensuring that residents can breathe freely in the very places they should feel the safest their own homes. Tom Bates, Mayor, Berkeley, California 6 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872

LATINO ORIGIN: 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Calabasas 7

MEDIAN INCOME: $140000 Median Income $120000 $100000 $80000 $60000 $40000 $20000 $0 Albany Baldwin Park Berkeley Calabasas Compton Contra Costa County Dublin Glendale Marin County Pasadena Richmond San Rafael Santa Clara County Santa Monica South Pasadena POPULATION: implement strong tobacco control policies. Temecula Union City 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 Calabasas Temecula 8 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872

CITIES AND COUNTIES ON THE RISE policies are noteworthy and deserve acknowledgement. Municipality Category of Policies Passed in 2013 Arcata Auburn Berkeley Baldwin Park Beaumont Buellton Capitola Carmel-by-the-Sea Carpinteria Chico Colusa Coronado Daly City Duarte El Monte Gardena Glendale Grass Valley Grover Beach Hillsborough Los Gatos Monterey remains D) 9

Municipality Category of Policies Passed in 2013 Oroville Palo Alto Petaluma Plymouth Sacramento County San Diego Santa Cruz San Francisco San Ramon South San Francisco Susanville Tehachapi Walnut Creek West Covina Williams Fifty years ago, the U.S. Surgeon General first identified the devastating effects of tobacco. Since then we have made tremendous progress, helping the public understand the risks from smoking, working to reduce smoking rates across America and passing policies that protect people from the dangers of tobacco. The policies reflected in this report demonstrate the remarkable work that is being done at the local level to ensure that all Californians have safe and clean air to breathe. Dr. Michael Ong, Associate Professor in Residence, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Chair, California Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee 10 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872

CALIFORNIA TOBACCO CONTROL BY THE NUMBERS State of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Grades adopted each of the policy provisions that are graded. BREAKDOWN OF ALL TOBACCO CONTROL POLICIES IN CALIFORNIA 328 114 141 11

BREAKDOWN OF OVERALL TOBACCO CONTROL GRADE A B C D F 3% 6% 61% 16% Overall Tobacco Control Grade Breakdown Across California 12% LIST OF TOP GRADES IN EACH CATEGORY The number of strong Smokefree Outdoor Air Policies has increased from 37 in 2010 to 61 today 12 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872

A B 120 3 100 80 23 60 114 40 62 7 20 30 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air Smokefree Housing Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products 13

RAISE YOUR GRADE can work in any community. So how can your community improve its health and raise its grade? Below is a worksheet that can be used to determine what types of policies could improve the health of your city or county column and see how many more points you will need to increase your grade. No points are available for grey hands of children. SMOKEFREE OUTDOOR AIR Smokefree Dining Smokefree Entryways Smokefree Public Events Smokefree Areas Smokefree Service Areas Smokefree Sidewalks Smokefree Worksites 1 Point Total Points Some or all sidewalks or other pedestrian walkways Some or all outdoor worksites Allows designated smoking Less than 15 feet of all entryways or within an Some types of public events but not all trails Some types of service areas but not all Within 15-19 feet of all entryways Allows designated smoking areas Allows designated smoking areas smokefree 20 or more feet from all entryways smokefree smokefree All service areas 18+ points = A 13-17 points = B 8-12 points = C 3-7 points = D 0-2 points = F TOTAL: SMOKEFREE HOUSING Nonsmoking Units Nonsmoking Common Areas Disclosure Nuisance Housing Authority Units 1 Point Total Points housing units Secondhand smoke the control of the housing authority Indoor common areas Disclosure for either apartments or condominiums Indoor and outdoor common areas Disclosure for both apartments and condominiums TOTAL: 11+ points = A 8-10 points = B 5-7 points = C 2-4 points = D 0-1 point = F 14 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872

REDUCING SALES OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS Policy Provisions: the license. Tobacco Retailer Licensing Sales near Schools and Parks Sales in Pharmacies Sampling of Tobacco Products 1 Point Total Points 0 of the other 3 provisions outlined above or licensing annual fee and any of the other 3 provisions outlined above Prohibit retailers near schools and/or parks Prohibit sales at some pharmacies Prohibit sampling or of tobacco products fee and 1 of the other 3 provisions outlined above and 2 of the other 3 provisions outlined above fee and 2 of the other 3 provisions outlined above TOTAL: 4+ points = A 3 points = B 2 points = C 1 point = D 0 points = F 15

LOCAL GRADING METHODOLOGY bar is set high because tobacco remains the number one preventable cause of death in California and because health improvement. The three tobacco control policy grades that are assigned to each city and county are: OVERALL TOBACCO CONTROL GRADE its grades in the three categories. SMOKEFREE OUTDOOR AIR that restrict smoking in a variety of outdoor areas ranging from parks to sidewalks. 16 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872

outdoor dining areas. Criteria certain types of bars and/or restaurants into all enclosed areas where smoking is prohibited. Criteria entryways concerts and other similar events that take place on public property. Criteria events Criteria 17

Criteria downtown areas and outdoor shopping centers. Criteria Criteria SMOKEFREE HOUSING and common areas. health of tenants. State law authorizes landlords to prohibit smoking in the units they manage. While it was ordinances. Grade Criteria Units. These point values are then added together to calculate the overall Smokefree Housing grade using a 18 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872

Criteria required apartments and condominiums if the areas are places of employment. These areas are places of employment if there is an employee who guard or maintenance worker. Criteria smoking areas in outdoor common areas are required to inform tenants about the areas of the property where smoking is prohibited. There are no statewide requirements for disclosure of smokefree housing policies for landlords or owners that do not restrict smoking on their property. Criteria declared nonsmoking so that disclosure of smoking units is not applicable. policy for the property for either only apartments or only condominiums 19

Criteria These policies generally need to be approved by the City Council/Board of Supervisors. It is important to note Criteria REDUCING SALES OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS Grade Criteria is given a point value between 0 and 4 based on the strength of their ordinance. Bonus points are available and local laws and penalize retailers who sell to minors. 20 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872

in California to punish the business owner or the clerk when an illegal sale is made. Tobacco retailers are also Criteria is based on the provisions of the ordinance that a city or county has adopted with the following scale: youth smoking. schools and parks. Criteria retailer licensing ordinance availability of tobacco products at pharmacies associates them with other healthy products and with the retailer license. 21

Criteria pharmacies in the city/county tool that tobacco companies use to gain new customers and keep current customers addicted to new types of to reduce prevalence rates for using tobacco products. Criteria GRADE SCALE A: 11-12 points B: 8-10 points C: 5-7 points D: 2-4 points F: 0-1 points A: 18+ points B: 13-17 points C: 8-12 points D: 3-7 points F: 0-2 points A: 11+ points B: 8-10 points C: 5-7 points D: 2-4 points F: 0-1 points A: 4+ points B: 3 points C: 2 points D: 1 point F: 0 points 22 www.lung.org/california 1-800-LUNG-USA 1-800-586-4872

ALAMEDA COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade B A A A C B C D D B F D C A C 12 9 11 12 12 5 8 5 3 4 10 0 4 6 12 5 Smokefree Outdoor Air A A A A B A A D C B F C A A B Dining n/a 3 22 20 20 21 18 17 22 19 6 12 16 0 10 21 21 16 Smokefree Housing A B A A D B F D D B F D D A D 3 3 3 Nuisance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14 13 8 12 12 4 8 0 2 2 8 0 3 3 12 2 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products D A A A D D D D D A F D D A D 3 7 1 5 6 5 1 1 1 1 1 6 0 1 1 6 1 23

Overall Tobacco Control Grade D 12 2 Smokefree Outdoor Air C Dining 22 8 Smokefree Housing F Nuisance N/A 14 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F n/a n/a n/a 7 0 State of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Grades ALPINE COUNTY 24

Ione Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F F 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F D F F Dining 22 0 2 2 4 0 0 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMADOR COUNTY 25

Biggs Overall Tobacco Control Grade F D F C F F 12 0 4 0 5 1 1 Smokefree Outdoor Air F C F F F F Dining 22 0 10 0 0 2 0 Smokefree Housing F D F D D D Nuisance 14 0 2 0 2 2 2 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F D F A F F 7 0 1 0 4 0 0 BUTTE COUNTY 26

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F 12 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F Dining 22 0 0 Smokefree Housing F F Nuisance 14 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F 7 0 0 CALAVERAS COUNTY 27

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F 12 1 1 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air D D F Dining 22 4 4 2 Smokefree Housing F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F 7 0 0 0 COLUSA COUNTY 28

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F D C D F F C B F F F C F B A D C B A 12 0 0 2 6 2 0 0 7 8 0 0 1 7 0 8 12 4 7 8 11 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F D C D F F A A F F F A F B A F A A A Dining 3 3 22 0 0 4 9 4 0 0 21 21 0 0 0 20 0 16 20 0 20 18 20 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F C B F F F C F A A F D A B 3 3 3 3 Nuisance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 5 0 11 13 0 4 13 8 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F D A D F F D D F F D D F D A A C F A 7 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 6 4 2 0 5 Moraga 29

Overall Tobacco Control Grade D F 12 3 1 Smokefree Outdoor Air B D Dining n/a 22 12 4 Smokefree Housing F F Nuisance n/a n/a 14 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F 7 0 0 DEL NORTE COUNTY 30

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F 12 0 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F Dining 22 2 0 2 Smokefree Housing F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F 7 0 0 0 EL DORADO COUNTY 31

FRESNO COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F C F F F F F F F D F F F F F 12 1 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air D F C F D F F F D D F D F F F F Dining 22 6 2 8 0 4 0 2 2 4 4 0 6 0 0 2 2 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F A D F F F F F F A F F F F F 7 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 Fresno Huron Kerman 32

Overall Tobacco Control Grade D F F 12 3 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air B F F Dining 3 22 15 2 0 Smokefree Housing F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F 7 0 0 0 GLENN COUNTY 33

Overall Tobacco Control Grade C C C F F F F F 12 5 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air A A A F F F F F Dining 3 22 20 18 20 0 0 0 0 0 Smokefree Housing D D B F F F F F Nuisance 14 4 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HUMBOLDT COUNTY 34

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F B F D F F F F 12 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F B F D F D F F Dining 3 22 2 16 0 4 0 3 0 2 Smokefree Housing F D F D F F F F Nuisance 14 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F A F F F F F F 7 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 IMPERIAL COUNTY 35

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F 12 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F Dining n/a n/a 22 2 2 Smokefree Housing F F n/a Nuisance n/a n/a 14 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F 7 0 0 INYO COUNTY 36

KERN COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F D D F D F F F C D D 12 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 5 4 4 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F F F F F F D F F Dining 22 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F F F F F Nuisance n/a n/a n/a n/a 14 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F A A F A F F F A A A 7 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 4 Wasco 37

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F 12 0 0 0 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F F Dining 22 0 0 0 2 0 Smokefree Housing F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 Lemoore KINGS COUNTY 38

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F 12 1 1 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air D D F Dining 22 4 4 0 Smokefree Housing F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F 7 0 0 0 LAKE COUNTY 39

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F 12 1 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air D F Dining 22 6 0 Smokefree Housing F F Nuisance 14 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F 7 0 0 LASSEN COUNTY 40

LOS ANGELES COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F D D D F A F F F C F B A B C F F A F F C F 12 0 1 2 3 2 0 12 0 0 0 6 0 9 12 9 5 1 0 12 1 0 6 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F D C F D F A F F F C F B A A D D F A D F C F Dining 3 22 0 6 8 0 6 2 18 0 0 0 10 0 16 22 21 4 4 0 20 4 0 8 2 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F A F F F F F C A D F F F A F F F F 3 Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 5 12 4 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F B D F A F F F A F A A A A F F A F F A F 3 7 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 5 4 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 41

LOS ANGELES COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F C C D C A F D C D F A F C F D D F F F F D D 12 1 5 5 4 5 12 1 4 6 3 0 12 0 6 0 4 2 1 0 1 0 4 4 Smokefree Outdoor Air D D D F D A D F C B F A F C F F C F F D F F F Dining 3 3 22 6 6 4 2 6 19 4 0 8 17 0 22 0 8 2 0 8 0 2 4 0 0 0 Smokefree Housing F F F F F A F F F F F A F F F F F F F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F A A A A A F A A F F A F A F A F D F F F A A 7 0 5 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 0 6 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 4 4 La Verne 42

LOS ANGELES COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade C C C D C F F F D C F C F F A F F F F F F F 12 5 7 5 4 6 1 1 0 4 7 0 6 0 0 12 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Smokefree Outdoor Air D C D F C D F F F C F D F F A F F D D F F D D Dining 3 3 3 22 4 10 7 0 12 7 2 2 0 12 0 5 2 0 21 2 2 3 4 1 0 4 4 Smokefree Housing F D F F F F F F F D F D F F A F F F F n/a F F F Nuisance 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A A A A A F D F A A F A F F A F F F F n/a F F F 7 4 4 4 5 4 0 1 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43

LOS ANGELES COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade B C F F F A C F F F A B F F F F D F F C 12 8 5 0 1 1 12 5 0 1 1 11 9 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 5 Smokefree Outdoor Air A D F D D A D F D D B A D F D F D F D D Dining 3 3 3 22 20 4 0 4 3 19 6 0 4 6 16 20 4 0 4 2 6 0 4 4 Smokefree Housing F F F F F A F F F F A D F F F F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A A F F F A A F F F A A F F F D D F F A 7 4 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 Vernon 44

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F 12 0 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F Dining 22 2 2 2 Smokefree Housing F F F Nuisance 14 0 1 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F 7 0 0 0 MADERA COUNTY 45

MARIN COUNTY Ross Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F C B B B C D A B C A 12 1 1 7 8 9 9 5 3 12 8 7 12 Smokefree Outdoor Air F D B A A A A C A A B A Dining 3 22 2 4 15 21 21 19 20 12 21 21 16 19 Smokefree Housing D F A A D A D D A A A A 3 Nuisance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14 2 0 13 13 2 12 2 2 12 13 12 13 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products n/a F F F A D n/a F A F F A 7 0 0 0 4 1 0 5 0 0 5 46

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F 12 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F Dining 22 2 Smokefree Housing F Nuisance 14 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F State of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Grades 7 0 MARIPOSA COUNTY 47

Overall Tobacco Control Grade C F C D C 12 6 0 6 4 5 Smokefree Outdoor Air D F C F F Dining 22 7 0 8 2 0 Smokefree Housing D F F F D Nuisance 14 2 0 0 0 2 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A F A A A 7 4 0 4 4 4 MENDOCINO COUNTY 48

Los Banos Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F F F 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F F F F Dining n/a n/a n/a 22 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MERCED COUNTY 49

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F 12 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F Dining 22 0 0 Smokefree Housing F F Nuisance 14 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F 7 0 0 MODOC COUNTY 50

Overall Tobacco Control Grade C F 12 5 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air A F Dining 22 21 2 Smokefree Housing D F Nuisance 14 4 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F 7 0 0 MONO COUNTY 51

MONTEREY COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade C F F F F F F F F F F F C 12 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 Smokefree Outdoor Air D F D F F F D D F D F F F Dining 22 5 0 4 0 0 0 7 7 0 3 0 0 0 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F D F F F D Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A F F F F F F F F F D F A 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 Marina 52

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F D 12 0 0 1 1 0 2 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F D D F D Dining 3 22 2 0 4 4 0 3 Smokefree Housing F F F F F D Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 2 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 NAPA COUNTY 53

Overall Tobacco Control Grade C C F F 12 5 5 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air D D F F Dining 3 22 4 5 2 2 Smokefree Housing F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A A F F 7 4 4 0 0 NEVADA COUNTY 54

Brea ORANGE COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F F F F F F F F F C F C F F F F F F F 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F D F D D F F F D D A D A F F F F F D F Dining 3 3 22 0 2 0 0 4 2 3 4 2 2 2 3 6 18 2 18 0 2 2 2 2 5 0 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F F F F F F D F D F F F F F F F Nuisance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Orange 55

ORANGE COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F C D F F F F F F 12 0 0 1 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F D F D D F F F F F F Dining 3 22 0 0 3 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F F F F F Nuisance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F A D F F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 56

Loomis Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F F F 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F F D F Dining 22 2 0 0 0 0 4 2 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLACER COUNTY 57

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F 12 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F Dining 22 0 2 Smokefree Housing F F Nuisance 14 0 1 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F 7 0 0 PLUMAS COUNTY 58

Banning RIVERSIDE COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade C C F D D F D C D C D F F C D 12 5 5 0 4 4 0 4 5 4 5 4 1 0 5 4 Smokefree Outdoor Air D D F F F F F D F D F F F D F Dining 3 3 22 4 4 0 0 0 0 2 4 2 3 0 0 2 3 0 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A A F A A F A A A A A D F A A 7 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 4 4 5 4 1 0 5 4 59

RIVERSIDE COUNTY Norco Overall Tobacco Control Grade F D C B D C F D F C D A C C 12 1 4 5 8 4 6 1 4 1 5 4 11 5 5 Smokefree Outdoor Air D F D B F A D F F D F A D D Dining 3 3 3 3 3 3 22 2 0 3 15 2 22 4 2 0 3 0 18 3 3 Smokefree Housing F F F D F D F F F F F B F F 3 Nuisance 14 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F A A A A D F A D A A A A A 7 0 4 4 5 4 1 0 4 1 4 4 4 4 5 60

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F C F F F D C C 12 0 5 1 0 0 4 5 5 Smokefree Outdoor Air F D F F F F D D Dining 3 3 22 0 4 2 0 0 2 3 4 Smokefree Housing F F D F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F A F F F A A A 7 0 4 0 0 0 4 5 4 SACRAMENTO COUNTY 61

Overall Tobacco Control Grade D F F 12 4 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F Dining 22 0 0 0 Smokefree Housing F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 1 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A F F 7 4 0 0 SAN BENITO COUNTY 62

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade D F F F F F F F F F F B F 12 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air D F F F F F D F F F F A F Dining 22 4 0 0 0 2 2 4 2 0 0 0 22 2 Smokefree Housing F F F F F D F F F F F A F 3 3 Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products D F F F F F F F F F F F F 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F D F F F F F F F F F 12 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F C D F F F F F D F D Dining 22 0 0 10 6 0 2 0 2 0 4 2 6 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F F F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64

SAN DIEGO COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade D D D D B D D F F F D F F D F F B C F 12 2 2 4 4 9 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 0 8 5 1 Smokefree Outdoor Air C C A A A C C D D D C D D D D F A D D Dining 3 3 3 3 3 3 22 9 10 19 20 22 10 8 6 5 6 10 6 5 7 5 2 20 6 6 Smokefree Housing F F F F D F F F F F F F F F F F F F F Nuisance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F A F F F F F F F F B F F A A F 3 7 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 5 0 La Mesa 65

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade B 12 9 Smokefree Outdoor Air B Dining 3 22 17 Smokefree Housing C 3 Nuisance 14 6 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A 7 6 66

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F F F F 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F F D F F Dining 22 0 2 2 0 0 6 2 2 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F D F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 67

Overall Tobacco Control Grade C F C D F F B C 12 5 1 5 4 0 1 10 5 Smokefree Outdoor Air D D D A F D A D Dining 3 22 4 4 5 21 2 4 20 3 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F C F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A F A F F F A A 7 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 68

SAN MATEO COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F B F D F B F F F C F C F D F D D D F D 12 0 8 1 2 1 9 1 1 0 7 1 5 1 2 1 3 2 3 0 4 Smokefree Outdoor Air F A F D F A F F F A A F D F D F D D D F D Dining n/a n/a 3 3 n/a n/a 22 0 21 2 7 0 21 0 0 0 9 18 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 6 2 4 Smokefree Housing F A F D F A F D F n/a C F F F F F D F D F D 3 Nuisance 14 0 12 0 2 0 13 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F D F D D D F F n/a D D A D D D D D D F C 7 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 69

Overall Tobacco Control Grade D B F F F D F F B 12 3 10 0 0 0 3 0 0 8 Smokefree Outdoor Air C A F F F D F F B Dining 3 3 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 22 12 21 0 0 0 6 0 0 13 Smokefree Housing F C F F F D F F D Nuisance n/a 14 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products D A F F F D F F A 7 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 70

SANTA CLARA COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade B F F F F D F D D D C F D F A 12 8 1 1 1 0 2 1 3 3 2 7 1 2 1 12 Smokefree Outdoor Air A D D D F C D n/a B C C B F D D A Dining 3 3 22 20 4 4 4 0 10 6 14 12 12 14 0 4 6 19 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F F F F D D F F A Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 13 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A F F F n/a F F n/a F D F B F D F A 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 6 71

Overall Tobacco Control Grade C B D B C 12 6 8 3 8 6 Smokefree Outdoor Air A B C B D Dining 3 3 3 22 19 14 11 13 4 Smokefree Housing D D D D D Nuisance 14 2 4 2 2 2 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products D A F A A 7 1 4 0 4 4 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 72

Overall Tobacco Control Grade D D F D 12 3 2 1 2 Smokefree Outdoor Air C D F D Dining 3 3 22 9 7 0 4 Smokefree Housing D D D D Nuisance 14 2 2 2 2 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 SHASTA COUNTY 73

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F 12 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F Dining 22 0 2 Smokefree Housing F F Nuisance n/a 14 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F n/a 7 0 0 SIERRA COUNTY 74

SISKIYOU COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F F F F F F 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F F F F F F F Dining 22 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dorris Dunsmuir 75

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F D F F F D F 12 0 0 2 0 0 1 3 1 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F D F F D D F Dining 3 22 0 0 4 0 0 3 4 2 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F D F F F C D 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 Benicia SOLANO COUNTY 76

SONOMA COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F D B B D B F D B 12 0 1 4 8 8 4 9 1 4 8 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F B A B A A F B A Dining 3 3 3 22 0 2 16 20 16 19 21 0 16 18 Smokefree Housing F D D A A F A D F A 3 Nuisance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14 0 2 2 12 11 0 13 2 0 12 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F D F D F D F 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 77

STANISLAUS COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F F C F F F 12 1 1 1 0 0 1 5 1 0 1 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F F F D F F F Dining 22 2 2 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 Smokefree Housing D D D F F D F D F D Nuisance 14 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F A F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 78

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F 12 1 1 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air D D F Dining 22 6 6 0 Smokefree Housing F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F 7 0 0 0 SUTTER COUNTY 79

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F 12 0 0 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F F F Dining 22 0 2 0 0 Smokefree Housing F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 TEHAMA COUNTY 80

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F 12 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F Dining 22 2 Smokefree Housing F Nuisance 14 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F State of Tobacco Control 2014 California Local Grades 7 0 TRINITY COUNTY 81

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F F F F F F F 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air F D F F F F F F F Dining 22 2 4 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Smokefree Housing F F F F F F F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F F F F F F F 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TULARE COUNTY 82

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F D 12 0 2 Smokefree Outdoor Air F D Dining 22 0 4 Smokefree Housing F D Nuisance 14 0 2 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F 7 0 0 TUOLUMNE COUNTY 83

VENTURA COUNTY Overall Tobacco Control Grade C F D D D F F F D F F 12 5 0 4 4 4 1 0 1 3 2 0 Smokefree Outdoor Air A F A C F F F D B F F Dining 3 3 22 21 0 22 7 0 2 0 4 16 2 0 Smokefree Housing D F F D F F F F F D F Nuisance 14 4 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F D A D F F F D F 7 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 84

Overall Tobacco Control Grade B D F D D 12 9 4 1 2 4 Smokefree Outdoor Air A F D C F Dining 3 22 18 0 4 11 2 Smokefree Housing D F F F F Nuisance 14 2 0 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products A A F F A 3 7 4 4 0 0 4 YOLO COUNTY 85

Overall Tobacco Control Grade F F F 12 0 0 1 Smokefree Outdoor Air F F D Dining 3 22 0 0 5 Smokefree Housing F F F Nuisance 14 0 0 0 Reducing Sales of Tobacco Products F F F 7 0 0 0 YUBA COUNTY 86