Hosp Lab Management (HLM) Service. HLM Tie-ups Cervical Screening & Diagnostics Tie-up Business Process Flow

Similar documents
Diagnostics: The Effect on Evidence Based Clinical Pathways. DNA vs Disease. Bruce K. Pa+erson MD CEO and President, IncellDx, Inc.

Pap plus HPV every 3 years with screening stopped at 65, 75 and 100 years; Pap plus HPV every 2 years with screening stopped at 65, 75 and 100 years.

News. Laboratory NEW GUIDELINES DEMONSTRATE GREATER ROLE FOR HPV TESTING IN CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING TIMOTHY UPHOFF, PHD, DABMG, MLS (ASCP) CM

Cervical Cancer Screening. David Quinlan December 2013

The new Cervical Screening Test for Australian women: Louise Farrell

Natural History of HPV Infections 15/06/2015. Squamous cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma

Focus. International #52. HPV infection in High-risk HPV and cervical cancer. HPV: Clinical aspects. Natural history of HPV infection

Objectives. I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today. Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines: Updates and Controversies

I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today.

Cervical Screening for Dysplasia and Cancer in Patients with HIV

Laboratory Considerations

I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today.

Faculty Pap Smear Guidelines: Family Planning Update 2008 Part Two

Making Sense of Cervical Cancer Screening

Screening for the Precursors of Cervical Cancer in the Era of HPV Vaccination. Dr Stella Heley Senior Liaison Physician Victorian Cytology Service

Appropriate Use of Cytology and HPV Testing in the New Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines

Cervical Cancer Research in South Africa

Human Papillomaviruses: Biology and Laboratory Testing

Woo Dae Kang, Ho Sun Choi, Seok Mo Kim

Cervical Cancer Screening for the Primary Care Physician for Average Risk Individuals Clinical Practice Guidelines. June 2013

Clinical outcomes after conservative management of CIN1/2, CIN2, and CIN2/3 in women ages years

Welcome. THE ROLE OF oncofish cervical ASSESSMENT OF CERVICAL DYSPLASIA. March 26, 2013

P16 et Ki67 Biomarkers: new tool for risk management and low grade intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL): be ready for the future.

Management of Abnormal Cervical Cytology and Histology

Clinical Policy Title: Fluorescence in situ hybridization for cervical cancer screening

Human Papillomavirus. Kathryn Thiessen, ARNP, ACRN The Kansas AIDS Education and Training Center The University of Kansas School of Medicine Wichita

BC Cancer Cervix Screening 2015 Program Results. February 2018

Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Cervical Testing and Results Management. An Evidenced-Based Approach April 22nd, Debora Bear, MSN, MPH

HPV-Negative Results in Women Developing Cervical Cancer: Implications for Cervical Screening Options

Screening for Cervical Cancer: Demystifying the Guidelines DR. NEERJA SHARMA

Human Papillomavirus

Cervical cancer prevention: Advances in primary screening and triage system

He Said, She Said: HPV and the FDA. Audrey P Garrett, MD, MPH June 6, 2014

HPV & CERVICAL CANCER POLICY & LEGISLATIVE TOOLKIT, 3 RD EDITION

Risk factors for precancerous lesions of the cervix in a population of Georgian women

Samuel B. Wolf, D.O., F.A.C.O.G. Emerald Coast Obstetrics and Gynecology Panama City Florida

National Cervical Screening Program MBS Item Descriptors

Case Based Problems. Recommended Guidelines. Workshop: Case Management of Abnormal Pap Smears and Colposcopies. Disclosure

Should Anal Pap Smears Be a Standard of Care in HIV Management?

L impact attendu de la vaccination contre le virus du papillome humain sur les pratiques de dépistage du cancer du col uterin

Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

An evaluation of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing within the UK cervical cancer screening programme Sherlaw-Johnson C, Philips Z

Done by khozama jehad. Neoplasia of the cervix

CINtec PLUS and the Pap smear: a co-testing alternative

Associate Professor of Gyn. & Obs., Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

The Future of Cervical Screening. Jenny Ross

SESSION J4. What's Next? Managing Abnormal PAPs in 2014

Quantitative Optical Spectroscopy of the Uterine Cervix: A cost effective way to detect and manage cervical disease

PAP smear. (Papanicolaou Test)

Lessons From Cases of Screened Women Who Developed Cervical Carcinoma

Dysplasia: layer of the cervical CIN. Intraepithelial Neoplasia. p16 immunostaining. 1, Cervical. Higher-risk, requires CIN.

!"#$%&'(#)*$+&,$-&.#,$/#0()1-$ ),1')$2(%&,2#,%$%(0'#$34567$

Details of HPV-based Cervical Cancer Screening in Turkey

BRITISH COLUMBIA S CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAM

Cervical Cancer Screening

HPV the silent killer, Prevention and diagnosis

Cervical Cancer Screening

HPV Testing & Cervical Cancer Screening:

Biomed Environ Sci, 2015; 28(1): 80-84

ASCCP 2013 Guidelines for Managing Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests

High-risk Human Papillomavirus Infection in Low Risk Women: Incidence, Patient Characteristics, and Clinical Meaning for Cervical Cancer

o 2-yearly (Pap test) o 18 to 69 years 1 o Registry reminder

Human Papillomavirus Genotyping and Cervical Smear in Duhok/Iraq

Management Algorithms for Abnormal Cervical Cytology and Colposcopy

How do we compare? IP724/BMTRY Introduction to Global and Public Health. Feb 21, 2012 Basic Science Rm Sharon Bond, PhD, CNM

Multimodal Spectroscopic Imaging of the Cervix for Triaging Patients to Colposcopy

Acceptable predictive accuracy of histopathology results by colposcopy done by Gynecology residents using Reid index

The society for lower genital tract disorders since 1964.

CERVICAL CANCER FACTSHEET. What is cervical cancer?

HPV Molecular Diagnostics and Cervical Cytology. Philip E. Castle, PhD, MPH American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) March 15, 2012

Updated ASCCP Consensus Guidelines For Managing Diagnosed Cervical Cancer Precursors Michael A. Gold, M.D.

THE PERFORMANCE OF CEPHEID XPERT HPV

Clinical Relevance of HPV Genotyping. A New Dimension In Human Papillomavirus Testing. w w w. a u t o g e n o m i c s. c o m

Human papillomavirus and vaccination for cervical cancer

I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today.

Cervical Precancer: Evaluation and Management

Taking Laboratory Coding for a Spin. Corrie Alvarez, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, CEDC

CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING IN BOTSWANA: A ROLE FOR TELEMEDICINE A. STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESIS AND SPECIFIC AIMS

STOCS-H Scottish TOC Study HPV test comparison

The experience with. carehpvin El Salvador

Cervical Cancer Prevention in the 21 st Century Changing Paradigms

Proposed new national cervical screening program. Dr Elizabeth Jackson Obstetrician Gynaecologist Cairns

Clinical Practice Guidelines June 2013

Clinical Policy Title: Fluorescence in situ hybridization for cervical cancer screening

The impact of the HPV vaccine in Scotland.

I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today.

Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Update

Why HPV Screening Which Problems What Methods

HPV and Cervical Cancer, Screening and Prevention. John Ragsdale, MD July 12, 2018 CME Lecture Series


Cervical Cancer Screening Update. Melissa Hartman, DO Women s Health

Evidence-based treatment of a positive HPV DNA test. Th. Agorastos Prof. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Aristotle University Thessaloniki/GR

PAP SMEAR by Dr.Shantha Krishnamurthy MD Senior Consultant Pathology Fortis Hospitals

Bottoms UP HIV and Anal Cancer from Screening to Prevention

Update on HPV Testing. Robert Schlaberg, M.D., Dr. med., M.P.H. Assistant Professor, University of Utah Medical Director, ARUP Laboratories

Epigenetic markers on the horizon: how to triage hrhpv positive women

Objectives. Background. Background. Background. Background 9/26/16. Update on Cervical and HPV Screening Guidelines: To pap or not to pap?

Transcription:

Hosp Lab Management (HLM) Service HLM Tie-ups Cervical Screening & Diagnostics Tie-up Business Process Flow

Women s Healthcare: Demography

End of uncertainties

Actual Disease Burden: Delhi NCR: FY2012-13 80% Patients do not receive Ca Cx screening / diagnostic tests 80% get detected for LGTI Only 7% patients receive appropriate treatment 93% patients livewith the disease and get detected for invasive ca.

Cost-Effectiveness and/or Cost-Benefit Analysis of Preventive Intervention In comparison to other preventive interventions and to commonly accepted cost-effectiveness benchmarks, cervical cancer screening is highly cost-effective. Introduction of screening to populations previously unexposed to screening reduces cervical cancer rates by 60% to 90% within 3 years of implementation. The relative costs and benefits of screening will vary depending on the age of patients screened and the screening interval. A study that included patient-time costs estimated that the cost-effectiveness ratio of a conventional Pap smear repeated every three years up to the age of 75 was $11,830 per quality-adjusted life year saved (in year 2000 dollars). Eichler H, Kong SX, Gerth WC, Mavros P, Jonsson B. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health-care resource allocation decision-making: how are cost-effectiveness threshold expected to emerge? Value Health. 2004; 7(5):518-528. Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. IARC Working Group on evaluation of cervical cancer screening programmes. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;293:659-664. Mandelblatt JS et al. Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer. JAMA. 2002; 287(18):2372-2381.

Model schematic: Premalignant states Non-Cervical Cancer Deaths HSIL Treated Wellness HPV Inf LSIL/CIN1 HSIL/CIN2+ Hysterectomy or Non-Cervical Disease Am.J. Epidemiology Vol 151, No12 2000 The Cervical Cancer progression must be STOPPED at the CIN 2+ stage The clinical stages of LSIL/ CIN1 are highly subjective for prognoses Nearly 70% LSIL/ CIN1 regress v/s nearly 70% CIN2 progress to Ca Cx Most CIN2+ disease is asymptomatic Most LSIL/ CIN do not show abnormalities on Cytology/ histopathology Most CIN disease requires patients frequent hospital /pathlabs visit

Model schematic: Malignant states Undetected Ca Cx Stage I Undetected Ca Cx Stage II Undetected Ca Cx Stage III Undetected Ca Cx Stage IV Non-Cervical Cancer Death Non-Cervical Cancer Death Non-Cervical Cancer Death Cancer Survivor Am.J. Epidemiology Vol 151, No12 2000 The cost of undetected cancer and referral to cancer hospitals The cost of detected cancer and associated chemo- radiotherapy is manifolds incremental, deprives other incurable cancer patients Agony of cancer survivors very high

Cost Effectiveness Influencers Ideal Clinical Test performance High Sensitivity (NPV), High Specificity (PPV) High Reproducibility, High Sustainability >> OncoTect combines Cost of current diagnostic approach Increased patient visits, repeated laboratory investigations, greater clinical dilemma on disease prognosis, frustrated patient >> seeks second opinion, lost to follow up Patients loose money, hospitals loose revenue, healthcare inadequacy Reduction in diagnostic cost burden early detection facilitates affordable treatment, HSIL vs Cx Ca ie. reduce incidence (reduce viral burden I e transmission) as well as mortality A more sensitive and specific test will always COST more since it detects more disease but has longer term benefit.. A Win-Win for hospitals and patients

Variability in Test Performance Test A: Sensitivity 75%, Specificity 75% Standard deviation of sensitivity 0.099 Test B: Sensitivity 75%, Specificity 92% Standard deviation of sensitivity 0.025 Marginal incremental cost compared to Test A: 680- only Adding a test that has a high clinical specificity will cut down on the COST of disease management... Lesser referrals to cancer hospitals

Variability Random variability in test characteristics has potentially important economic consequences Tests with less variability have more predictable costs Systematic variability in test characteristics has important consequences for equitable distribution of benefits of screening and disease diagnostics HPV mrna testing likely to be favored over DNA testing owing to higher specificity, quantitative estimation and intact cell characteristics that allows better clinical correlation with cytology and histopathology.

About us: Leading HPV Diagnostics Pioneers in the field of Cervical Cancer screening & diagnostics First to introduce LBC test in India (Currently every big/ medium/ small hospital uses LBC) First to introduce HPV molecular testing by Hybrid Capture (Further replicated by all Labs & research institutes in India) Nearly 15 years of experience

Our Service A to Z Diagnostic solution for Cervical Cancer screening & diagnostics Most advanced quantitative oncogenic activity test HPV mrna Test Molecular co-testing HPV DNA HR, HPV DNA LR, HPV PCR Genotyping Liquid based Cytology (LBC) with dual filtartion technology first time in India.. Histopathology Cervical biopsy Diagnosis of STI (Sexually transmitted infections)

Hospital Lab Management (HLM) - Process Flow Signing of Agreement with the hospital labs Incorporation of Test name & rates in Hospital/ Lab system Service branding as exclusive hospital service to enhance awareness and acceptance of screening & diagnostics CMEs & Colposcopy Workshops One-to-One meeting with hospital doctors Service Identity for the Hospital Specimen collection by well trained staff Patient to pay at the Hospital Provide clinically validated & sterile sampling kits

CME Conference by National/International Experts

Hospital Service Branding for increasing patient base & footfall by spread of cancer prevention Standees Wall Poster for clinics Patient awareness booklets (FAQs) Patient awareness camps with Cancer NGOs Innovative Tools

International Technology Support OncoTect 3Dx-M Established in technical collaboration with IncellDx, a California based MDx company IncellDx received the 2012 North American Product Leadership Award in the Molecular Diagnostics Market from Frost & Sullivan A zealous mission in women s health Frost & Sullivan cited IncellDx s newly available cervical cancer testing methodology, HPV OncoTect, as the company s greatest contribution and the gold standard for gynecological care.

Successful Tie-ups so far National.. International.. AND THERE IS A ROOM FOR YOU, TOO

Advantages to the Hospital: Total Solution State-of-the-modern-care procedures under one umbrella One-point Lab for all Cervical Cancer diagnostic solutions Partnership with Experts of the Field Additional Revenue generation to the Hospital on test outsource Regular CME/Conference every 6 months by experts of the Field Co-Branded literature on cervical cancer awareness for patients at hospital premise Co-Branded wall posters & standees for encouraging more people to go for Cervical Cancer screening Increase in number of follow-up patients with better diagnosis Increase in number of patients for further treatment

About the Test HPV OncoTect is a screening & diagnostic test for cervical precursor lesions (CIN2+). It identifies the oncogenic activity of HPV in infected cervical cells. This method is widely used in U.S.A, Canada, Asia, South America and Europe A flow cytometry based in situ hybridization test for quantitative detection of CIN2+ Takes advantage of the fact that oncogenic genotypes of HPV over-express E6 and E7 mrna following integration of HPV into genomic DNA. The presence of high levels of HPV E6, E7 mrna indicates that these cells are undergoing the molecular changes of cellular transformation that are the early stages of high grade CIN. Advantages of test as compared to current Diagnosis : Detects active progression towards invasive cancer rather than if women is at risk of getting a lesion. It Increases PPV of cervical cancer screening up to 90 % as compared to HPV DNA alone resulting in to less stress on the patient due to fewer false positives by significantly reduces unnecessary colposcopy or biopsies. Detects lesions earlier because molecular changes occur well before morphological changes.

Additional Revenue Generation to the Hospital We provide tempting margin to the Hospital on test outsourced to us Our technology offers higher specificity as compared to current testing - Regaining of Lost patient by 20 % 20 % more patient to the Hospital for long term follow up Our patient awareness activity to go for Cervical Cancer screening will help to increase 10 % more patients to go for Cervical Cancer diagnosis Considering 1 out of Every 7 women getting affected with Cervical cancer in India Additional diagnosis will provide additional patient to the hospital for treatment