Commercial in Confidence

Similar documents
EFFICACY TESTS (EN 1276) VIRUSOLVE + AMITY UK LTD HOSPITAL INFECTION RESEARCH LABORATORY CITY HOSPITAL NHS TRUST DUDLEY ROAD BIRMINGHAM B18 7QH

Deb InstantGEL Complete. Summary of Microbiological Test Data ISSUE 2

1/ Can New Biodegradable Complexing Agents Replace Tetrasodium EDTA to Boost Preservatives? W. Siegert

MICROBIOLOGICAL PROFILE

Concentrate Appearance: colourless liquid * at 20 C miscible with water in any proportion Density: g/cm 3 *

FIT TECHNICAL DATA. Summary of Research Studies and Production Trials

Biological Consulting Services

Microbiological Summary

SCOPE AND FIELD OF APPLICATION

Clinell Universal Wipes Batch number Client

MICROBIOLOGICAL PROFILE

REPORT OF ANALYSIS No. 8342/13/GDY

Determination of MIC & MBC

NF EN Avril Boutique AFNOR. Pour : UNIVERSITE CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN. Client Commande N TA. le 14/2/ :39

CCD-170 Instant Hand Antiseptic Products

Partners Biofilm Remover

Laboratorios CONDA, S.A. Distributed by Separations

Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of Odor Eliminating Compounds

Microbiological Quality of Non-sterile Products Culture Media for Compendial Methods

TECHNICAL REPORT on the disinfection systems in dental unit water lines.

Naturally derived Alcohol free Proven efficiency

SUMMARY OF ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY

CHAPTER 8 ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF THE CRUDE ETHANOLIC EXTRACT AND THE ISOLATED COMPOUNDS FROM THE STEM OF COSTUS IGNEUS

The effect of alcohol concentration on the growth of Micrococcus luteus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Hydrogen Peroxide Influence on Microbial Survivorship. Jacob Cebulak Central Catholic Pittsburgh Grade 9

Natural Sanitizing Ingredient. Product Name: MLE-T

Effect of Spray Tank Materials on Anti-Bacterial Activities of Sodium Hypochlorite

Overview. Protect Your Business Against. Poultry & Poultry Processing Industry. Unique molecular bonding technology. and viruses

Lactiferm NCIMB 11181

Questions and Answers about

Effect of Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite on Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm. Abstract. imedpub Journals

COMPARATIVE ANTI MICROBIAL STUDY OF SHUDDHA KASISA AND KASISA BHASMA

Action Against Hunger-Spain and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)

Enhanced microbiological safety of acidified infant formulas tested in vitro

Evaluation of the TEMPO Ò most probable number technique for the enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae in food and dairy products

Chapter 4. Anti-bacterial studies of PUFA extracts from Sardinella longiceps and Sardinella fimbriata. 4.1 Introduction

AZOWIPE CLINICAL EFFICACY DATA

By Tony Patsy, Pittsburgh Central Catholic, Grade 9 ARTIFICIAL SWEETENER EFFECTS ON MICROBIAL FLORA

Powerful Germ Kill, PURELL Peace of Mind.

OECD GUIDELINE FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS QUANTITATIVE METHOD FOR EVALUATING BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY OF MICROBICIDES USED ON HARD NON-POROUS SURFACES

4ways. C.difficile. Endur. to kill. i d e. e n d u r o c. . c o m. The new approach to nosoc omial pathogens

METRIGUARD. Technical Bulletin

THE "REVERSAL," NEUTRALIZATION, AND SELECTIVITY

Technical Summary: August 6, 2015 GFS BioProtect Foam Hand Sanitizer with Aloe Vera:

QUAT 44 Cleaner Disinfectant Deodorizer Fungicide Mildewstat Virucide*

Anti-microbial Properties of Thai Traditional Flower Vegetable Extracts

PRODUCT INFORMATION SHEET

THE FIRST ANTIBACTERIAL INFECTION PROTECTION MEDICAL GLOVE

IDEXX Summary. Pseudalert was compared to SM 9213E at an independent laboratory that regularly tests pool/spa waters

Draft of Sanitation Standards for General Foods

Antimicrobial Effects of Vinegar. Daniel Crawford Grade 9 Central Catholic High School

HARMONISED PHARMACOPOEIA DEHYDRATED CULTURE MEDIA FOR SUPPORTING REGULATORY COMPLIANCE AVAILABLE NOW P O RTF O LIO.

Mr. Vipul R. Suryavanshi Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis Bombay College of Pharmacy, Kalina, Santacruz (E), Mumbai

DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD

Effect of Cold Temperature on Germicidal Efficacy of Quaternary Ammonium Compound, lodophor, and Chlorine on Listeria

Preservative A2 Plus. 1. INCI Composition. 2. Overview. 3. Specification data. Diazolidinyl Urea 99.0% Iodopropynyl Butylcarbamate 1.

A new selective blood agar medium for Streptococcus pyogenes and other haemolytic streptococci

Evaluation of Low Temperature Depuration for Reducing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Oysters

Calibration Protocols

The 7 Day Revolution!

Survival of Aerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria in

QUAT 256 Disinfectant Cleaner Deodorizer Mildewstat Fungicide Virucide*

Powerful Germ Kill, PURELL Peace of Mind.

Proficiency Testing. Food Microbiology. October 2015

ERYSIPELOTHRIX RHUSIOPATHIAE1. ordinary culture media. This is especially true when pathogens are to be isolated SELECTIVE MEDIUM FOR STREPTOCOCCI AND

Summary and Conclusion

LIST OF PUBLISHED STANDARDS

CHAPTER 6 EVALUATION OF SELECTED PLANT EXTRACTS FOR EVALUATION OF SELECTED PLANT EXTRACTS FOR ANTI-ACNE ACTIVITY

Evaluation of the feasibility of the VACUETTE Urine CCM tube for microbial testing of urine samples

The Whitley Internal HEPA filtration system bacteriological testing

CAVIWIPES. Technical Bulletin

New Reduced Toxicity cleaning system is granted EPA registration as a Sanitizer/Virucide (EPA Registration No. s and )

Synergism between hydrogen peroxide and seventeen acids against six bacterial strains

Data Sheet. Fluorogenic HDAC 8 Assay Kit Catalog #: 50068

Media Fill Test Kits. Manufactured by. Making USP <797> compliance easy!

Sialic Acid Assay Kit

POWERFUL GERM KILL, PURELL PEACE OF MIND. PURELL HEALTHCARE SURFACE DISINFECTANT

This chapter provides tests for the estimation of the numble, a suitable, validated adaptation of a procedure set forth

National Standard of the People s Republic of China. National food safety standard Milk powder

ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF GYMNEMA SYLVESTRE HYDROALCOHOLIC LEAF EXTRACT.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION. Studies on antimicrobial evaluation of some 1-((1-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-

Surveillance of Surgical Site Infection in Surgical Hospital Wards in Bulgaria,

FERTISAFE PLUS US PL AFE TIS FER

Survival of antibiotic resistant Pseudomonas strains in different types of water

Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Medicinal Chemistry Journal home page:

Abena Antimicrobial Glove

Comparative Efficacy of Peroxyacetic Acid and Sodium Hypochlorite Bleach against Enterobacteria, E. coli and Yeasts Molds on Cherries

Laboratory assessment of physical and chemical methods of preserving urine specimens

Vimta Labs Ltd., Life Sciences Facility, Plot No. 5, Alexandria Knowledge Park, Genome Valley, Shameerpet, Hyderabad, Telangana

CAVIWIPES1. Technical Bulletin

BY ZACHARY MODISPACHER 11 TH GRADE CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL

TWIN POWER #17 #4017

Handwashing and antiseptic-containing soaps in hospital

Whisper 7054 Foam Hand Sanitiser

Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation

TOTAL HYGIENE SOLUTIONS

In-Use Evaluation Report

Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan KM.5 Makassar 90231, South Sulawesi Indonesia.

Transcription:

Determination of Bactericidal Activity of Zwiteck Sanitizer using the European Standard Method BS EN 1276:2009 ~ Project Report Prepared for Zwiteck BV Inspiring tomorrow s professionals

Determination of Bactericidal Activity of Zwiteck Sanitizer using the European Standard Method BS EN 1276:2009 Author: S.Rout Signature: Date: Checked by: R.Morgan Signature: Date: Authorised by: P.Humphreys Signature: Date: Report No: HyDis/MTP/DIFFX+DYE/01/18 ISSUE: Date: Draft for Comment Version 1 30/01/18 1

Address Procedure Product Hygiene and Disinfection Centre University of Huddersfield Queensgate Campus Huddersfield United Kingdom HD1 3DH BSEN 1276:2009 Dilution neutralisation approach Zwiteck Sanitizer powder blend with dye (0.2g/100g) Organisms Escherichia coli 8879 (NCIMB) Enterococcus hirae 8191 (NCIMB) Pseudomonas aeruginosa 10421 (NCIMB) Staphylococcus aureus 9518 (NCIMB). 1

1 Introduction A sample of Zwiteck Sanitizer powder blend with dye (0.2g/100g) was submitted the following analysis: Bactericidal activity employing BS EN1276 1 dirty conditions against S.aureus and P.aeruginosa to identify the lowest concentration of powder blend required to pass under these conditions Bactericidal activity of this lowest concentration of powder blend against all four candidate organisms in clean and dirty conditions. 1.1 Product The 0.04g of dye was added to 20g of powder blend. This dye incorporated powder blend was diluted to concentrations of 10g/l, 5g/l, 2.5g/l, 1g/l and 0.5g/l in hard water at a temperature of 35 C. 2 Procedures 2.1 BS EN1276 The test was carried out as specified by BS EN1276 1 (Appendix 1). Briefly this involves the preparation of a standard suspension of test organisms containing 1.5 5.0 x 10 8 cells ml -1 of the four standard bacteria Escherichia coli 8879 (NCIMB); Enterococcus hirae 8191 (NCIMB); Pseudomonas aeruginosa 10421 (NCIMB) and Staphylococcus aureus 9518 (NCIMB). In order to carry out the test 1 ml of interfering substance (0.3 gl -1 Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) Clean conditions, 3.0 gl -1 BSA Dirty conditions) was pipetted into a Universal bottle, followed by 1 ml of the desired bacterial suspension. The mixture was mixed and left for 2 minutes at 20 o C, after which 8 ml of product was added and mixed. The reaction mixture was then left for 5 minutes at 20 o C, after this contact time a 1 ml sample was transferred to a tube containing 8 ml of neutraliser and 1 ml of water and left for a further 5 minutes at 20 o C. The neutralisation mixture was then plated onto Tryptone Soya Agar (TSA) and incubated at 37ºC for 24 to 48 hours. Following incubation the fraction of surviving organisms was noted and a log reduction factor calculated. In addition to the test procedure outlined above a range of validations were performed to ensure the validity of the test (Appendix 1 and 2). 2.1.1 Requirements of this standard The product, when tested as stipulated under the required test conditions (clean and dirty at 20ºC, 5 minute contact time, for the selected reference strains), shall demonstrate at least a 5 log 10 reduction in viable counts. The test as carried out as stipulated in 1. 1

2.2 Neutraliser The neutraliser used contained: 12g/l saponin, 0.4g/l L-histidine and 10g/L sodium thiosulphate, prepared in de-ionised water and autoclaved for 15 minutes at 121ºC. 3 Results and Conclusions The results obtained against S.aureus and P.aeruginosa in dirty conditions (Figure 1, Appendix 2) indicated that the powder blend was capable of the generating required >5.0 Log reduction in microorganisms within 5 minutes when concentration was reduced to 1g/l. When formulated at 0.5g/l, a >5.0 Log reduction in bacterial numbers was no longer achieved. Formulation (g/l) Performance at 5 minutes Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Staphylococcus aureus 10 >5.0 Log Rdn >5.0 Log Rdn 5 >5.0 Log Rdn >5.0 Log Rdn 2.5 >5.0 Log Rdn >5.0 Log Rdn 1 >5.0 Log Rdn >5.0 Log Rdn 0.5 <2.8 Log Rdn <2.8 Log Rdn Log Rdn -Log Reduction Factor Figure 1: Performance of Zwiteck Sanitizer powder blend at a range of concentrations. When expanded to a full test regimen (Figure 2, Appendix 2), the 1g/l powder blend was capable of generating the >5.0 Log reduction in bacterial numbers against all four candidate organisms in both clean and dirty conditions. 2

Performance at 5 minutes 1g/L formulation Organism Clean conditions Dirty conditions Enterococcus hirae >5.0 Log Rdn >5.0 Log Rdn Escherichia coli >5.0 Log Rdn >5.0 Log Rdn Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Staphylococcus aureus >5.0 Log Rdn >5.0 Log Rdn >5.0 Log Rdn >5.0 Log Rdn Log Rdn -Log Reduction Factor Figure 2: Performance of 1g/l powder blend formulations in full BSEN 1276 test regimen. 4 References 1. BSI (2010) BSEN 1276:2009. Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics Quantitative suspension test for the evaluation of bactericidal activity of chemical disinfectants and antiseptics used in food, industrial, domestic, and institutional areas method and requirements (phase 2, step 1). British Standards Institute, London. 3

BSEN 1276 Flow Sheet. TEST Clean Dirty Clean Commercial in Confidence Validation A Val n Dirty Validation B Water Val n Validation C Clean Diluent Dirty 8ml Neutraliser 8ml Product 2 mins 8ml Product 2 mins 8ml Hard Water 5 mins Plate out In Duplicate 5 mins 8ml Neutraliser 5 mins 5 mins 2 mins Plate out In Duplicate 8ml Neutraliser Water Plate out In Duplicate suspension = 1.5x10 8 5.0x10 8 cfu/ml Validation = 6x10 2 3x10 3 cfu/ml Add Val n to Each Tube 30 mins Plate out In Duplicate 1

Appendix 2 Results: Minimum biocidal concentrations Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacterial Bacterial Experimental Conditions Validation Neutraliser Dilution Neutralisation Control Clean Dirty Toxicity Control Clean Dirty Clean Dirty 75 74 39 36 Vc 35 40 47 53 10-6 176 159 < 15 15 10-7 15 20 < 1.5E+02 Nvo 7.5E+01 3.8E+01 B 3.8E+01 5.0E+01 N 1.7E+08 > 1.1E+05 N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 1.7E+08 Clean #### Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.5E+02 Dirty 5.05 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.7E+01 No DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.7E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.7E+01 Organism P.aeruginosa 10g/L Organism P.aeruginosa 5g/L Bacterial Bacterial Experimental Conditions Validation Neutraliser Dilution Neutralisation Control Clean Dirty Toxicity Control Clean Dirty Clean Dirty 75 74 39 36 Vc 35 40 33 38 10-6 176 159 < 15 15 10-7 15 20 < 1.5E+02 Nvo 7.5E+01 3.8E+01 B 3.8E+01 3.6E+01 N 1.7E+08 > 1.1E+05 N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 1.7E+08 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.5E+02 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.7E+01 No DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.7E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.7E+01 Clean #### Dirty 5.05 Bacterial Bacterial Experimental Conditions Validation Neutraliser Dilution Neutralisation Control Organism Clean Dirty Toxicity Control Clean Dirty Clean Dirty P.aeruginosa 75 74 39 36 Vc 35 40 44 38 10-6 176 159 < 15 15 2.5g/L 10-7 15 20 < 1.5E+02 Nvo 7.5E+01 3.8E+01 B 3.8E+01 4.1E+01 N 1.7E+08 > 1.1E+05 N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 1.7E+08 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.5E+02 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.7E+01 No Dirty 5.05 DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.7E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.7E+01 Organism Bacterial Bacterial Experimental Conditions Validation Neutraliser Dilution Neutralisation Control Clean Dirty Toxicity Control Clean Dirty Clean Dirty P.aeruginosa 75 74 Vc 39 36 Vc 35 40 Vc 44 38 10-6 216 212 < 15 15 1g/L 10-7 21 22 < 1.5E+02 Nvo 7.5E+01 A 3.8E+01 B 3.8E+01 C 4.1E+01 N 2.1E+08 > 1.4E+05 N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 2.1E+08 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.5E+02 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.7E+01 No Dirty 5.15 DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.7E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.7E+01 Bacterial Bacterial Experimental Conditions Validation Neutraliser Dilution Neutralisation Control Organism Clean Dirty Toxicity Control Clean Dirty Clean Dirty P.aeruginosa 74 52 Vc 32 36 Vc 49 52 Vc 38 46 10-6 194 172 Vc > 3000 3000 0.5g/L 10-7 19 17 Na < 3.0E+04 Nvo 6.3E+01 A 3.4E+01 B 5.1E+01 C 4.2E+01 N 1.8E+08 R > 6.1E+02 N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 1.8E+08 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 6.3E+02 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.2E+01 No Dirty 2.78 DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.2E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.2E+01 CLEAN C 0.5 Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 2.5E+01 No DIRTY C 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 2.5E+01 1

Staphylococcus aureus Organism Bacterial Experimental Conditions Validation Neutraliser Toxicity Dilution Neutralisation Control Bacterial Control S.aureus 60 82 Vc 38 40 Vc 33 41 Vc 32 30 10-6 178 172 Vc < 15 15 10g/L 10-7 19 17 Na < 1.5E+02 7.1E+01 A 3.9E+01 B 3.7E+01 C 3.1E+01 N 1.8E+08 R > 1.2E+05 Nvo N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 1.8E+08 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.1E+02 Dirty 5.07 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 No DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.6E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 Organism Bacterial Experimental Conditions Validation Neutraliser Toxicity Dilution Neutralisation Control Bacterial Control S.aureus 60 82 Vc 38 40 Vc 33 41 Vc 33 42 10-6 178 172 Vc < 15 15 5g/L 10-7 19 17 Na < 1.5E+02 7.1E+01 A 3.9E+01 B 3.7E+01 C 3.8E+01 N 1.8E+08 R > 1.2E+05 Nvo N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 1.8E+08 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.1E+02 Dirty 5.07 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 No DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.6E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 Organism Bacterial Experimental Conditions Validation Neutraliser Toxicity Dilution Neutralisation Control Bacterial Control S.aureus 60 82 Vc 38 40 Vc 33 41 Vc 45 31 10-6 178 172 Vc < 15 15 2.5g/L 10-7 19 17 Na < 1.5E+02 N 1.8E+08 R > 1.2E+05 Nvo 7.1E+01 A 3.9E+01 B 3.7E+01 C 3.8E+01 N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 1.8E+08 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.1E+02 Dirty 5.068073 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 No DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.6E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 Organism Bacterial Experimental Conditions Validation Neutraliser Toxicity Dilution Neutralisation Control Bacterial Control S.aureus 60 82 Vc 41 56 Vc 33 41 Vc 39 42 10-6 178 172 Vc < 15 15 1g/L 10-7 19 17 Na < 1.5E+02 N 1.8E+08 R > 1.2E+05 Nvo 7.1E+01 A 4.9E+01 B 3.7E+01 C 4.1E+01 N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 1.8E+08 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.1E+02 Dirty 5.07 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 No DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.6E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 Organism Bacterial Experimental Conditions Validation Neutraliser Toxicity Dilution Neutralisation Control Bacterial Clean Dirty Control Clean Dirty Clean Dirty S.aureus 62 81 Vc 46 52 Vc 49 54 Vc 40 41 10-6 204 211 Vc > 3000 3000 0.5g/L 10-7 18 16 Na < 3.0E+04 Nvo 7.2E+01 A 4.9E+01 B 5.2E+01 C 4.1E+01 N 2.0E+08 R > 6.8E+02 N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 2.0E+08 Clean Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.2E+02 Dirty 2.83 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 No DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.6E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 CLEAN C 0.5 Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 2.6E+01 No DIRTY C 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 2.6E+01 2

1g/l Powder blend 1276. Commercial in Confidence 3 Organis Experimental Conditions Validation Dilution Neutralisation Control Bacterial Bacterial Neutraliser Toxicity Control m E. coli 85 70 Vc 44 53 87 65 Vc 76 45 Vc 32 38 52 53 10-6 164 160 Vc < 15 15 < 15 15 10-7 13 15 Na < 1.5E+02 < 1.5E+02 N 1.6E+08 R > 1.1E+05 > 1.1E+05 Nvo 7.8E+01 A 4.9E+01 7.6E+01 B 6.1E+01 C 3.5E+01 5.3E+01 N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 1.6E+08 Clean 5.03 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.8E+02 Dirty 5.03 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.9E+01 DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.9E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.9E+01 CLEAN C 0.5 Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.0E+01 DIRTY C 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.0E+01 Organis Experimental Conditions Validation Dilution Neutralisation Control Bacterial Bacterial Neutraliser Toxicity Control m E.hirae 67 60 Vc 36 32 44 38 Vc 43 64 Vc 40 43 54 48 10-6 168 168 Vc < 15 15 < 15 15 10-7 13 14 Na < 1.5E+02 < 1.5E+02 N 1.7E+08 R > 1.1E+05 > 1.1E+05 Nvo 6.4E+01 A 3.4E+01 4.1E+01 B 5.4E+01 C 4.2E+01 5.1E+01 N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 1.7E+08 Clean 5.04 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 6.4E+02 Dirty 5.04 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.2E+01 DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.2E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.2E+01 CLEAN C 0.5 Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 2.7E+01 DIRTY C 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 2.7E+01 Organis Experimental Conditions Validation Dilution Neutralisation Control Bacterial Bacterial Neutraliser Toxicity Control m P.aeruginosa 81 64 Vc 42 36 Vc 42 45 Vc 34 31 10-6 216 212 Vc < 15 15 10-7 21 22 Na < 1.5E+02 1.4E+05 Nvo 7.3E+01 A 3.9E+01 B 4.4E+01 C 3.3E+01 N 2.1E+08 R > N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 2.1E+08 Clean 5.15 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.3E+02 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= 3.6E+01 B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.6E+01 CLEAN C 0.5 Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 2.2E+01 DIRTY C 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 2.2E+01 Organis Experimental Conditions Validation Dilution Neutralisation Control Bacterial Bacterial Neutraliser Toxicity Control m S.aureus 78 69 Vc 42 39 Vc 46 42 Vc 31 29 10-6 172 181 Vc < 15 15 10-7 21 21 Na < 1.5E+02 1.2E+05 Nvo 7.4E+01 A 4.1E+01 B 4.4E+01 C 3.0E+01 N 1.8E+08 R > N is between 1.5E+8 cfu/ml and 5E+8 cfu/ml, N = 1.8E+08 Clean 5.08 Nv is between 3E+2 cfu/ml and 1.6E+3 cfu/ml, Nv = 7.4E+02 CLEAN A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.7E+01 DIRTY A 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo= B 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = CLEAN C 0.5 Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = DIRTY C 0.5 x Nvo when 0.5 x Nvo = 3.7E+01 3.7E+01 2.2E+01 2.2E+01