Heiner Lieth, Director Linda Dodge Shannon Still Lea Ragaini Ron Lane Jackie Fortunko

Similar documents
Heiner Lieth, Director Linda Dodge Shannon Still Lea Ragaini Ron Lane Jackie Fortunko

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Gaura (Gaura lindheimeri Siskiyou Pink )

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberrelic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Lady s Mantle (Alchemilla mollis Auslese )

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Dead Nettle (Lamium maculatum Shell Pink )

Heiner Lieth, Director Linda Dodge Shannon Still Ron Lane Jackie Fortunko

Heiner Lieth, Director Linda Dodge Shannon Still Ron Lane Jackie Fortunko

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Periwinkle (Vinca Tall Rosea Mix )

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Catnip (Nepeta cataria)

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of English Ivy (Hedera helix)

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Mogeton 25 WP (Quinoclamine) on Coral Bells (Heuchera sanguinea Firefly )

Efficacy of Management Tools for Fusarium Root & Crown Rot Final Objective

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

2014 Turfgrass Proceedings

2015 Turfgrass Proceedings

Acetamiprid, Dinotefuran, Thiomethoxam, Chenopodium, Buprofezin, and Flonicamid Efficacy and Phytotoxicity Trial: Citrus Mealybug (Planoccocus citri)

2015 Turfgrass Proceedings

20 Turfgrass Proceedings

2007 Powdery Mildew of Cantaloupe Fungicide Trial

Comparing the Efficiency of Different Foliarly-Applied Zinc Formulations on Peach and Pistachio Trees by Using 68 Zn Isotope

2008 Turfgrass Proceedings

The effect of surfactant foliar applications on tomato, pepper, watermelon, and cabbage transplant growth. C.S. Vavrina Vegetable Horticulturist

Knockdown and Residual Control of Bagrada Bug With Foliar Insecticides in Broccoli: 2013 Efficacy Report

Aphid Management on Head Lettuce Using Imidacloprid and Foliar Insecticides

Final 2013 Delaware Soybean Board Report

2007 Turfgrass Proceedings

12. ZINC - The Major Minor

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Lime Fertilizer Interactions Affecting Vegetable Crop Production' Delbert D. Hemphill, Jr., and T. L. ABSTRACT

EPA Reg. No (Except California) REVISED USE DIRECTIONS FOR CREEPING BENTGRASS, PERENNIAL RYEGRASS AND BERMUDAGRASS

2012 Turfgrass Proceedings

CONTROL OF BLACK TURFGRASS ATAENIUS ADULTS AND GRUBS WITH ADULTICIDES AND LARVICIDES

2016 FUNGICIDE GUIDE FOR BURLEY AND DARK TOBACCO

Management Program for Whiteflies on Propagated Ornamentals

MANAGING MARESTAIL AND GIANT RAGWEED IN WHEAT

PSB FIELD ASSAYS. 1 Trial No. 23 Ref no: IPL/KHA/SH/PPX/54 2 Product PS Bacteria 2 % A.S. 3 Crop Name Sorghum

Managing transplant size and advancing field maturity of fresh tomatoes and peppers

ORGANIC ROMAINE HEARTS LATE SUMMER 2017 SALINAS, CA

Feasibility of Reducing Slug Damage in Cabbage: Part II

2013 Turfgrass Proceedings

ZINC FERTILIZER GROUP / MISSTOF GROEP 2. Reg. No. B4255 Act/Wet No 36 of/van 1947

PROJECT TITLE: Evaluation of Preemergence Herbicides for Annual Weed Control in Young Blueberry Fields (Final Report Research).

2006- Foliar insecticide effects on soybean aphid and soybean yield. Summary Background Objective Site and application description

THE IMPACT OF FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF NITROGEN AND BORON ON 'HASS' AVOCADO FRUIT SET

Final Trial Report. western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis - FRANOC

Research Abstract for the CALIFORNIA LEAFY GREENS RESEARCH PROGRAM April 1, 2012 March 31, 2013

University of Idaho Pink Rot Fungicide Trial Powdery Scab Fungicide Trial

Nutrient Deficiency in Anthuriums

2008 PMR REPORT #ESOYSMI4 SECTION E: CEREAL, FORAGE CROPS, and OILSEEDS Insect Pests

LYGUS BUG MANAGEMENT IN SEED ALFALFA. Eric T. Natwick and M. Lopez 1 ABSTRACT

2008 Turfgrass Proceedings

CHEMICAL SAFETY IN THE GREENHOUSE

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2011

2016 Processing Onion Weed Control Trial

Influence of Herbicides on the Spring Transition of Bermudagrass Greens Overseeded with Perennial Ryegrass

How to Conduct On-Farm Trials. Dr. Jim Walworth Dept. of Soil, Water & Environmental Sci. University of Arizona

Balance GT/Balance Bean/LL Systems in Soybeans at Rochester, MN Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Annette Kyllo and Matthew Bauer

1999 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

Evaluation of Manganese Fertility of Upland Cotton in the Lower Colorado Valley

What s new with micronutrients in our part of the world?

2011 Lygus Bug Management Trial in Blackeyes Kearney Research and Extension Center, Parlier, CA C.A. Frate 1, S.C. Mueller and P.B.

Controlled Release Fertilizer Evaluations 1998

WATERMELON RESPONSE TO COPPER AND A COMPLETE MICRONUTRIENT SOURCE1

2012 Final Report. Evaluation of Aminocyclopyrachlor for Saltcedar Control

Objective: How it Was Done:

Treatments protocol # Sponsor Materials Timing/interval FP/ac Tol 1 lab non-treated Y 2 lab Thiram 65WSB 14d 3.0 lb Y

Reducing russeting of organically grown Elstar to increase quality

Objective: Procedures:

Evaluation of Phytotoxicity of Diazinon and Captan Formulations on Highbush Blueberries

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TOBACCO BEDS AND FIELDS Prepared by Lee Townsend, Extension Entomologist

Evaluation of new fungicides as potential management tools for Phytophthora crown and root rot on peppers

COPPER TOXICITY IN WOODY ORNAMENTALS

Evaluation of lime sulfur and sulforix for control of Exobasidium and Phomopsis diseases of blueberry and vinifera wine grapes, respectively

Fungicide control of apple scab: 2005 trial results

Water Quality and Treatments

2013 Turfgrass Proceedings

Limitations to Plant Analysis. John Peters & Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Tidewater Ag. Res. & Ext. Ctr.

Evaluation of Sclerotia Germination Stimulants for White Rot Control

AZOMITE and Coffee & Cacao

grow Fertiliser for the Future grow is a novel foliar fertilizer concept meeting the

Progress Report. Evaluation of Aminocyclopyrachlor for Saltcedar Control

Bio-efficacy of Clofentezine 50SC against two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch on rose cv. First Red in polyhouse

EVALUATION OF THE BIOFUNGICIDE ECOGUARD (BACILLUS LICHENIFORMIS) ON DOLLAR SPOT CONTROL WHEN USED ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH FUNGICIDES, 2010

2018 FUNGICIDE GUIDE FOR BURLEY AND DARK TOBACCO

Investigation into the etiology of decline of Raywood ash in Northern California

Efficacy of Amincocyclopyrachlor for Annual Broomweed Control

Reports of Soybean Research Conducted in 2011 by the Entomology Project

EFFICACY OF NEW PESTICIDES AGAINST SIXSPOTTED MITE EOTETRANYCHUS SEXMACULATUS (RILEY) (ACARI: TETRANYCHIDAE) ON AVOCADOS

Bioavailability of Cd to Food Crops in

Soil 4234 Guest Lecture

Nutrient Uptake Trial: Determination of Nutrient Uptake in Grapevines

Using silicon, Stimplex and plant resistance in pumpkin production systems to reduce plant disease loss

PISTACHIO MICRONUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Trace Yet Substantial

Peanut Disease Control Field Trials 2013

Glyphosate Efficacy on Giant Ragweed Infested With European Corn Borer

2008 Turfgrass Proceedings

PLANT NUTRITION. Marasperse AG The Lignosulfonate-Based Complexing Agent for Foliar Micronutrients

Transcription:

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Bluebeard (Caryopteris clandonensis Longwood Blue ) By Heiner Lieth, Director Linda Dodge Shannon Still Lea Ragaini Ron Lane Jackie Fortunko Project: Interregional Research Project #4 Project Number 23218A - July 29, 2004 Acknowledgements: Ahmet Gulcu Donors/Supporters: CDFA Minor Crops Research Grant, Project 2: Enhancement of the Western Region IR-4 Program to Address California Needs Green Leaf Perennials, Lancaster, PA UC Davis Environmental Horticulture IR4 Center Department of Environmental Horticulture University of California One Shields Ave. Davis, CA 95616 http://envhort.ucdavis.edu/ir4

1. INVESTIGATOR (Name, Address, Phone#): Dr. Heiner Lieth Department of Environmental Horticulture University of California One Shields Ave. Davis, CA 95616 Ph 530-752-7198 FAX 530-752-1819 Email: jhlieth@ucdavis.edu IR-4 ORNAMENTAL DATA REPORTING FORM (Please type or print) LOCATION OF TRIAL: TRIAL TYPE:(check one) FIELD CONTAINER X GREENHOUSE INTERIORSCAPE 2. PESTICIDE: COMMON NAME: 6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid A 4 A 7 FORMULATION: 1.8% + 1.8% (w/w) BATCH NO.: EPA REG. NO. 27135 PRODUCT: Fascination MFG: Valent 3. USE INFORMATION: COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANT: Bluebeard Caryopteris clandonensis Longwood Blue REASON: enhanced branching of potted crops SOIL TYPE OR TYPE OF POTTING MIX: UC Mix % SAND 35 % SILT % CLAY % OM 65 % ph 6.5 SEEDING DATE EMERGENCE DATE TRANSPLANTING DATE 4/23/04 PLANT OR POT SPACING 6 ROW SPACING 6 POT SIZE 4-inch PLOT SIZE 50 sq. ft. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN randomized complete block NO.OF REPS 9 (3 blocks) 4. APPLICATION PARAMETERS: TYPE OF APPLICATION: foliar NO. OF APPLICATIONS 2 APPLICATION TYPE manual spray bottle NOZZLE TYPE/SIZE NOZZLE PRESSURE DELIVERY RATE CALIBRATION DATE(S) 5. APPLICATION SUMMARY: APPL.DATE RATES (ppm)* GROWTH STAGE 6/17/04 0, 125 (0.5X), 250 (1X), 500 (2X) 8 weeks post-transplant 7/08/04 0, 125 (0.5X), 250 (1X), 500 (2X) 11 weeks post-transplant *Be sure to provide units 2

IR-4 ORNAMENTAL DATA REPORTING FORM (Please type or print) 6. RAINFALL/IRRIGATION RECORDS: INCLUDE RAINFALL/IRRIGATION INFORMATION (printouts, IR-4 forms, etc.) Plants were watered as needed (at least once daily) with half-strength Hoagland s solution 7. OTHER PESTICIDES, FERTILIZER, LIME AND ADJUVANTS USED: PRODUCT Orthene + Sanmite AMOUNT DATE 6/23/04 PRODUCT Orthene + Heritage AMOUNT DATE 6/30/04 PRODUCT Talstar F AMOUNT DATE 7/08/04 PRODUCT Pylon AMOUNT DATE 7/21/04 8. NARRATIVE SUMMARY OF METHODS AND RESULTS: (Use more pages if needed) Materials and Methods Plant Material and Culture. Young plants of Caryopteris clandonensis Longwood Blue were received from Yoder Bros. on 4/12/04. These were transplanted to 4-inch pots containing UC Mix on 4/23/04 and maintained in a greenhouse under natural day length for 8 weeks until the experiment began on June 17, 2004. For the experiment, the plants were transferred to a greenhouse under natural day length with day/night temperatures of 82 F/65 F (28 C/18 C) (Figure 1). The plants were watered as needed (at least once daily) during the 6-week experiment with half-strength Hoagland s solution. Applications of pesticides as part of a normal pest management program were made as needed (see No. 7 above). Experimental Procedure. Thirty-six plants were randomly chosen and individually tagged for treatment with 0, 125 ppm (0.5X), 250 ppm (1X) or 500 ppm (2X) Fascination with 9 replicates per treatment. These dosages were prescribed in an IR4 Fascination protocol dated 6/04 (Appendix A). The plants received the first of two foliar spray applications of the designated treatments on June 17, 2004 using manual spray bottles to spray leaves to runoff. The second application was made 20 days later on July 8, 2004. The plants were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 3 blocks and 3 treatment replicates per block. Phytotoxicity and efficacy measurements were taken at day 0 (June 17, 2004), day 21 (July 8, 2004) and day 42 (July 29, 2004). Phytotoxicity evaluations were based on a numerical rating scale of 0 (no injury) to 10 (complete kill) (Table 1). Efficacy measurements consisted of overall plant height (cm) and width (cm). In addition, the number of secondary branches on one tagged branch per plant was counted. Statistical Analysis. The data were analyzed using Proc GLM of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS). The phytotoxicity and change in mean value from the starting plant height and width were analyzed for significant differences using t-tests. Results Phytotoxicity Index. Fascination at all application rates had no effect on phytotoxicity index for Caryopteris clandonensis Longwood Blue as compared to control (0 ppm) (Figure 2, Appendix B). Efficacy. Fascination at all application rates did not increase plant height (Figures 3 and 3a, Table 2) or plant width (Figure 4, Table 2) as compared to control (0 ppm). Plants treated with 500 ppm Fascination showed increased numbers of secondary branches per branch compared to all other treatments and control at both 3 and 6 weeks (Figure 5, Appendix C). Discussion Phytotoxicity. Fascination at all rates tested caused no phytotoxicity symptoms on C. clandonensis Longwood Blue. Efficacy. Foliar application of Fascination did not increase the height or width C. clandonensis Longwood Blue. The 500 ppm application rate, double the recommended application rate, was effective for increasing the number of secondary branches on C. clandonensis Longwood Blue. No other application rates were effective for increasing branching. Thus we conclude that Fascination is an important tool for increasing branching during the production of C. clandonensis Longwood Blue at the 500 ppm application rate but not at the 125 ppm or 250 ppm rates. 3

9. GOOD RESEARCH PRACTICE STATEMENT: I acknowledge that I have read and followed the IR-4 Research protocol and completed this trial following good agricultural practice, or reported any deviations (note any changes from authorized protocol in narrative). SIGNATURE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR DATE 4

Table 1. Numerical plant damage rating scale used for phytotoxicity determinations. Rating Description of plant damage 0 No damage 1 No visible damage but unintended (non-permanent) impact 2 Slight leaf/tissue damage (curling leaves, necrosis, etc.) 3 Marginal chlorosis on some leaves (damage on up to 10% of plant) 4 10% 20% of plant damaged 5 Significant damage to much of plant (30% - 40%) 6 40% 60% of plant damaged 7 Chlorosis or necrosis on most of plant (60% - 70%) 8 Abscised leaves, branch dieback 9 Tissue severely damaged (80% - 100% of plant) 10 Complete kill Air Temperature - Greenhouse 180 90 Temperature (F) 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 6/12/2004 6/19/2004 6/26/2004 7/3/2004 7/10/2004 7/17/2004 7/24/2004 7/31/2004 Figure 1. Greenhouse temperatures during the experiment to evaluate the effects of Fascination on Caryopteris clandonensis Longwood Blue. 5

Phytotoxicity index 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Control 125 ppm (0.5X) 250 ppm (1X) 500 ppm (2X) 0 3 6 Duration of experiment (weeks) Figure 2. Phytotoxicity Index for Caryopteris clandonensis Longwood Blue treated with 0, 125, 250 or 500 ppm Fascination. SE bars shown. n=9. See Table 1 for explanation of values. 6

Plant height (cm) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Control 125 ppm (0.5X) 250 ppm (1X) 500 ppm (2X) 0 3 6 Duration of experiment (weeks) Figure 3. Plant height of Caryopteris clandonensis Longwood Blue treated with 0, 125, 250 or 500 ppm Fascination. SE bars shown. n=9. Table 2. Average increase (cm) of height and width for plants in the control and Fascination treatments for Caryopteris clandonensis Longwood Blue. Different letters within a column indicate significant differences between different treatments (P < 0.05). Means ± SE (n=9). Height increase (cm) Width increase (cm) over 3 weeks over 6 weeks over 3 weeks over 6 weeks Control 11.00 ± 3.81 a 25.78 ± 3.45 a 16.56 ± 1.15 ab 46.44 ± 2.30 a 125 ppm 11.56 ± 2.50 a 28.00 ± 3.26 a 12.67 ± 1.87 b 47.56 ± 2.86 a 250 ppm 11.44 ± 3.70 a 28.44 ± 4.05 a 18.00 ± 2.69 ab 48.33 ± 2.71 a 500 ppm 16.11 ± 3.42 a 31.11 ± 4.39 a 21.78 ± 2.38 a 53.89 ± 2.93 a 7

Control 125 ppm 250 ppm 500 ppm Block A Control 125 ppm 250 ppm 500 ppm Block B Control 125 ppm 250 ppm 500 ppm Block C Figure 3a. Representative plants of Caryopteris clandonensis Longwood Blue 6 weeks after 2 foliar applications of 0, 125, 250 or 500 ppm Fascination (Week 0 and Week 3). 8

Plant width (cm) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Control 125 ppm (0.5X) 250 ppm (1X) 500 ppm (2X) 0 3 6 Duration of experiment (weeks) Figure 4. Plant width of Caryopteris clandonensis Longwood Blue treated with 0, 125, 250 or 500 ppm Fascination. SE bars shown. n=9. 9

Secondary shoots per branch 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Control 125 ppm (0.5X) 250 ppm (1X) 500 ppm (2X) 0 3 6 Duration of experiment (weeks) Figure 5. Number of secondary branches per branch for Caryopteris clandonensis Longwood Blue treated with 0, 125, 250 or 500 ppm Fascination. SE bars shown. n=9. 10

Appendix A: GROWTH ENHANCEMENT OF ORNAMENTAL PLANTS WITH FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF 6-BENZYL ADENINE + GIBBERELLIC ACID (FASCINATION) Date: 6/04 Ornamental Protocol Number: 670 General label directions: Refer to product label or Technical Bulletin. Research program: Pest(s)/Plants Plants other than labeled species. Pesticide (common name and trade name): Refer to treatment list shown below. For label, material & if needed, spray surfactant contact: Valent USA, Joe Chamberlin, 770-985-0303, jcham@valent.com Plot size (must be adequate to reflect actual use condition) Replicates Minimum of 4 Treatment Units Controls (untreated controls to be included in all experiments) Application: FASCINATION Dosages - 1/2x 125 ppm or 0.125 pt/5 gal. 1x 250 ppm or 0.25 pt/5 gal. 2x 500 ppm or 0.5 pt/5 gal. Active Ingredient: 6-benzyl adenine + gibberellic acid (FASCINATION). Volume - Minimum of 100 gal/a. Timing - 2 Applications, 21 day spray interval. Record number of branches and length, then increased branching, increased extension and crop safety at 7, 14, 21 (then 2 nd appl.), 28 and 42 DAT. Reports: Method of application: Treatments should be applied according to product label instructions. application equipment consistent with conventional commercial equipment. Report completely on experimental design and method of application. Report plant size height x width before treatment and throughout the experiment. Weather Maintain temperature and precipitation (including irrigation) data. Soil type Identify soil type used in experimental area. Product When submitting data, include EPA registration number of product used. Efficacy Data should include percent control as well as an indication that infestation was light, heavy, etc. Record all application and evaluation dates. Phytotoxicity Record phytotoxicity data at all rates. Use a 0-10 scale. 0 = No Phytotoxicity 10 = complete kill. Please direct questions to: Dr. Robert M. Herrick, IR-4 Project, 681 US Highway #1 South, North Brunswick, NJ Phone: (732) 932-9575, Ext. 629. 11

Appendix B: PHYTOTOXICITY REPORT FORM Caryopteris Data Phyto Phyto Phyto Rate Rate Rate Fascination Treatment Block Rep 6/17/04 7/8/04 7/29/04 Control A 1 0 0 0 Control A 2 0 0 1 Control A 3 0 0 1 Control B 1 0 1 1 Control B 2 0 0 1 Control B 3 0 0 1 Control C 1 0 0 1 Control C 2 0 1 1 Control C 3 0 0 0 Control Mean 0.00 0.22 0.78 Control Std Dev 0.00 0.44 0.44 125 ppm A 1 1 1 1 125 ppm A 2 0 1 1 125 ppm A 3 0 0 1 125 ppm B 1 1 1 1 125 ppm B 2 0 0 0 125 ppm B 3 0 1 1 125 ppm C 1 0 1 1 125 ppm C 2 0 0 1 125 ppm C 3 0 1 1 125 ppm Mean 0.22 0.67 0.89 125 ppm Std Dev 0.44 0.50 0.33 250 ppm A 1 0 1 1 250 ppm A 2 0 1 1 250 ppm A 3 0 1 1 250 ppm B 1 0 0 0 250 ppm B 2 0 1 1 250 ppm B 3 0 0 2 250 ppm C 1 0 0 1 250 ppm C 2 0 1 0 250 ppm C 3 0 0 0 250 ppm Mean 0.00 0.56 0.78 250 ppm Std Dev 0.00 0.53 0.67 500 ppm A 1 0 2 1 500 ppm A 2 0 0 0 500 ppm A 3 0 0 1 500 ppm B 1 0 1 1 500 ppm B 2 1 1 1 500 ppm B 3 1 2 1 500 ppm C 1 0 0 1 500 ppm C 2 0 1 1 500 ppm C 3 0 0 0 500 ppm Mean 0.22 0.78 0.78 500 ppm Std Dev 0.44 0.83 0.44 NOTE: DEFINE MEASUREMENT OF PHYTOTOXICITY, OR INDEX OF INJURY (0=NO INJURY, 10=COMPLETE KILL) (See Table 1) 12

Appendix C: EFFICACY REPORT FORM Caryopteris Data Plant Plant Plant Plant Plant Plant Height Height Height Width Width Width # Branches # Branches # Branches Fascination (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) Treatment Block Rep 6/17/2004 7/8/2004 7/29/2004 6/17/2004 7/8/2004 7/29/2004 6/17/2004 7/8/2004 7/29/2004 Control A 1 39.5 52 68 32.5 53.5 89.25 14 21 14 Control A 2 46.5 53 67 34.5 51.75 88 17 21 17 Control A 3 42 56.5 72 45.75 50.5 91 25 21 22 Control B 1 49 55 73.5 42.5 57 69.5 8 10 9 Control B 2 40.5 60 76.5 28.5 58 77.75 17 14 15 Control B 3 43.5 56 70 22.75 48.25 76.5 23 19 19 Control C 1 25.5 23.5 42 50.5 49.75 82.5 7 5 11 Control C 2 44.5 64 73.5 39.5 53 87 22 17 28 Control C 3 42.5 55 65 31 57.25 86 9 9 9 Control Mean 41.50 52.78 67.50 36.39 53.22 83.06 15.78 15.22 16.00 Control Std Dev 6.68 11.57 10.23 8.87 3.53 7.12 6.76 6.02 6.30 125 ppm A 1 44.5 55 72 35.5 59 92.5 4 4 6 125 ppm A 2 56 68 85 53.5 55 93.5 0 2 4 125 ppm A 3 43.5 59 76 30.75 52 80.25 23 26 20 125 ppm B 1 37 49 61.5 48 43 79.25 22 23 23 125 ppm B 2 37 45 57 50.25 45.75 92.75 0 5 5 125 ppm B 3 47.5 61.5 79 27.5 43 74.5 0 0 0 125 ppm C 1 47 55 82.5 28 54.5 74 20 22 29 125 ppm C 2 44 55 66.5 30 49 94.5 17 16 14 125 ppm C 3 52 66 80.5 34.5 52.25 85 24 26 28 125 ppm Mean 45.39 57.06 73.33 37.56 50.39 85.14 12.22 13.78 14.33 125 ppm Std Dev 6.23 7.47 9.79 10.21 5.60 8.41 10.89 10.94 11.06 250 ppm A 1 53 58.5 74.5 42 49.5 85.75 15 12 10 250 ppm A 2 42 53 69 43 59.5 72.5 9 9 7 250 ppm A 3 50 69 86.5 31.25 43.5 82.25 23 28 24 250 ppm B 1 34 44 60 31.25 52.75 84.75 0 3 30 250 ppm B 2 47 57.5 71.5 33.75 45.5 72.75 0 2 3 250 ppm B 3 41 65 87 25.5 48 85.5 3 4 9 250 ppm C 1 47.5 57.5 73.5 44 68.75 91 4 10 12 250 ppm C 2 25 38 50 38 56.75 85 18 35 21 250 ppm C 3 40 39 62 35.5 59.5 99 3 5 12 250 ppm Mean 42.17 53.50 70.44 36.03 53.75 84.28 8.33 12.00 14.22 250 ppm Std Dev 8.65 11.01 12.04 6.26 8.10 8.23 8.43 11.68 8.83 500 ppm A 1 21.5 38 47.5 22.75 52 91 6 36 27 500 ppm A 2 40.5 59 71 23.25 46.75 79.5 22 35 29 500 ppm A 3 46.5 68.5 86.5 29.75 60 87.75 25 46 47 500 ppm B 1 27 47 66 31 45.5 71 14 33 27 500 ppm B 2 40.5 52 65.5 31.75 52 81.75 19 22 43 500 ppm B 3 36 44 60 35.25 47.5 78.5 17 33 34 500 ppm C 1 41.5 62.5 82.5 42.25 67.5 97 13 18 16 500 ppm C 2 29 42.5 51 34.75 51.5 98 10 18 21 500 ppm C 3 40.5 55.5 73.5 36 58.25 85.5 10 25 26 500 ppm Mean 35.89 52.11 67.06 31.86 53.44 85.56 15.11 29.56 30.00 500 ppm Std Dev 8.23 10.12 13.07 6.20 7.20 8.90 6.17 9.42 9.91 13