Platelet function testing to guide P2Y 12 -inhibitor treatment in ACS patients after PCI: insights from a national program in Hungary

Similar documents
What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Speaker s name: Thomas Cuisset, MD, PhD

Stephan Windecker Department of Cardiology Swiss Cardiovascular Center and Clinical Trials Unit Bern Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΙΩΑΝΝΙΝΩΝ. Εξατοµικευµένη αντιαιµοπεταλιακή αγωγή. Ποιο είναι το µέλλον?

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Lecture fees: AstraZeneca, Ely Lilly, Merck.

New insights in stent thrombosis: Platelet function monitoring. Franz-Josef Neumann Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen

Δοκιμασίες λειτουργικότητας αιμοπεταλίων και PCI

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

Learning Objectives. Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome

P2Y 12 blockade. To load or not to load before the cath lab?

Updated and Guideline Based Treatment of Patients with STEMI

Διάρκεια διπλής αντιαιμοπεταλιακής αγωγής. Νικόλαος Γ.Πατσουράκος Καρδιολόγος, Επιμελητής Α ΕΣΥ Τζάνειο Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Πειραιά

Low Dose Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 Inhibition, in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1)

Point-of-Care Genetic Testing for Tailored Anti-Platelet Therapy Ready for Prime Time?

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

Upstream P2Y 12 RB. Stefano Savonitto Divisione di Cardiologia Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova Reggio Emilia

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Belinda Green, Cardiologist, SDHB, 2016

Adjunctive Antithrombotic for PCI. SCAI Fellows Course December 9, 2013

Do We Need Platelet Function Assays?

Clopidogrel Response Variability and Platelet Function Testing: Should Routine Practice Be Changed in Interventional Cardiology?

The Korean Society of Cardiology COI Disclosure

Surveying the Landscape of Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Management

Why and How Should We Switch Clopidogrel to Prasugrel?

Is Cangrelor hype or hope in STEMI primary PCI?

Cangrelor: Is it the new CHAMPION for PCI? Robert Barcelona, PharmD, BCPS Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Cardiac Intensive Care Unit November 13, 2015

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

Clopidogrel vs New Antiplatelet Therapy (Prasugrel) Adnan Kastrati, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München, Germany

Oral anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of ACS patients the cost of reducing death!

Non ST Elevation-ACS. Michael W. Cammarata, MD

Adjunctive Antithrombotic for PCI. SCAI Fellows Course December 8, 2014

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Made Practical

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Cindy Baker, MD FACC Director Peripheral Vascular Interventions Division of Cardiovascular Medicine

Case Challenges in ACS The Very Elderly in the Cath Lab

Session Objectives. Clopidogrel Resistance. Clopidogrel (Plavix )

Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in ACS/PCI Which one to choose? V. Voudris MD FESC FACC 2 nd Cardiology Division Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center

10 Steps to Managing Non-ST Elevation ACS

Balancing Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitors for ACS Patients

תרופות מעכבות טסיות חדשות ד"ר אלי לב מנהל שרות הצנתורים ח השרון מרכז רפואי רבין

Quale terapia antiaggregante nello STEMI? Prasugrel vs ticagrelor

Antiplatelet therapy in ACS/PCI. Thomas Cuisset, CHU Timone, Marseille DIU Cardiologie Interventionnelle Paris, Janvier 2013

What hematologists should know about VerifyNow

Disclosures. Theodore A. Bass MD, FSCAI. The following relationships exist related to this presentation. None

COPYRIGHT. Harvard Medical School

Ticagrelor vs prasugrel in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE

Optimal lenght of DAPT in different clinical scenarios

Personalized Antiplatelet Therapy: State of the Art

Antiplatelet and Anti-Thrombotic Therapy. Ivan Anderson, MD RIHVH Cardiology

Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy for patients treated in STEMI network

Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Controversies in Cardiac Pharmacology

Recognizing the High Risk NSTEMI Patient for Early Appropriate Therapy

Αντιαιμοπεταλιακη αγωγη (ποια, πο τε και για πο σο)

Optimal Duration and Dose of Antiplatelet Therapy after PCI

Early Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome

TRIAL UPDATE 1. ISAR TRIPLE SECURITY Trial. Dr Deven Patel Royal Free Hospital

Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with ACS: A Focus on Prasugrel and Ticagrelor

Tim Henry, MD Director, Division of Cardiology Professor, Department of Medicine Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

Platelet Function Testing: Which Test, and How to Apply? - Current Limitations and Future Perspectives - Young-Hoon Jeong, M.D., Ph.D.

Acute coronary syndromes A European viewpoint. Felicita Andreotti, MD PhD FESC Catholic University Hospital Cardiovascular Diseases - Rome, IT

Antiplatelet Therapy: how, why, when? For Coronary Stenting

The Challenge. Warfarin or Novel Oral Anti-Coagulants in the PCI patient? Anticoagulation/Stroke

INNOVATIONS 2017: Acute Coronary Syndrome Antiplatelet Therapies in Medical and Invasive Strategies.

Angelika Cyganska, PharmD Austin T. Wilson, MS, PharmD Candidate 2017

Is the role of bivalirudin established?

Which drug do you prefer for stable CAD? - P2Y12 inhibitor

COME ORIENTARSI TRA I NUOVI. Maria Rosa Conte H. Mauriziano Torino

On admission Acute extensive anterior STEMI

Κωνσταντίνος Π. Τούτουζας Επ. Καθηγηηής Καρδιολογίας. A Πανεπιζηημιακή Καρδιολογική Κλινική, Ιπποκράηειο Νοζοκομείο

Angioplastica coronarica nel paziente anziano ad alto rischio emorragico

Πποβλημαηιζμοί με ηην ανηιαιμοπεηαλιακή αγωγή ζηο οξύ έμθπαγμα ηος μςοκαπδίος με ανάζπαζη ηος διαζηήμαηορ ST.

A PRAGMATIC RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CYP2C19 GENOTYPING IMPLEMENTATION FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI)

Asian AMI Registry Session The 17 th Joint Meeting of Coronary Revascularization (JCR 2017) Busan, Korea Dec 8 th 2017

3/23/2017. Angelika Cyganska, PharmD Austin T. Wilson, MS, PharmD Candidate Europace Oct;14(10): Epub 2012 Aug 24.

Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in PCI/ACS. Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC Director of Cardiovascular Research Assistant Professor of Medicine

Clopidogrel Use in ACS and PCI: Clinical Trial Update

Μιχάλης Χαμηλός, MD, PhD, FESC

STEMI AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY DISEASE

Στεφανιαίος ασθενής με μη βαλβιδική Κολπική Μαρμαρυγή - Νέες στρατηγικές

When and how to combine antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant?

Dauer der doppelten Plättchenhemmung nach AMI / Stent

UPDATES FROM THE 2018 ANTIPLATELET GUIDELINES

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Does COMPASS Change Practice?

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

'Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndromes: perioperative strategies to improve outcome'

OUTPATIENT ANTITHROMBOTIC MANAGEMENT POST NON-ST ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. TARGET AUDIENCE: All Canadian health care professionals.

Antiplatelet Therapy: Current Recommendations for Choice of Agent and Concurrent Therapy with Warfarin and Novel Oral Anticoagulants

Timing of Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

NAVIGATING THROMBOSIS AND BLEEDING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND CORONARY STENTING

Akute Koronarsyndrome

Razionale ed evidenze scientifiche di Doppia Antiaggregazione Piastrinica a lungo termine nel Paziente con Sindrome Coronarica Acuta

Joint Meeting of Coronary Revascularization 8 th to 9 th December 2017

and Ticagrelor Professor of Medicine (Cardiology), Georgetown University Associate Director, Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center

MONITORAGGIO DELLA FUNZIONE PIASTRINICA DURANTE TERAPIA CON TIENOPIRIDINE

Thrombin Receptor Antagonists and Other New Oral Antiplatelets Drugs

Transcription:

Platelet function testing to guide P2Y 12 -inhibitor treatment in ACS patients after PCI: insights from a national program in Hungary Dániel Aradi MD PhD Interventional Cardiologist Assistant professor Head of Thrombosis Research Heart Center Balatonfüred HUNGARY 13 December I JCR 2013 I Busan, South Korea

CONSULTING/RESEARCH GRANTS: - Verum Diagnostica LECTURE FEES: - Roche - Verum Diagnostica - DSI/Lilly - AstraZeneca - Krka - Bayer - Pfizer

Aradi et al. Am Heart J. 2010; 160: 543-51. Aradi et al. Eur Heart J. 2013 Sep 25. E-pub ahead of print. HPR

Stone et al. Lancet, 2013;382:614-23

Stone et al. Lancet, 2013;382:614-23

Wiviott SD et al. Circulation 2007; 116: 2923-32. Gurbel PA et al. Circulation 2009;120:2577-85.

Wiviott et al. NEJM 2007;357:2001-15. Wallentin et al. NEJM 2009;361:1045-57.

ESC guidelines on NSTE-ACS 2011. ESC guidelines on STEMI 2012. Take-on of the new drugs is <20%!!! Hamm CW et al. Eur Heart J. 2011; 2999-3054. Steg PG et al. Eur Heart J 2012; 2569-619

SELECTIVE 1 st September 2011.: Acute coronary syndromes patients with either diabetes mellitus or troponin positivity who undergo PCI with stenting and have no prior TIA/stroke in history can receive 70% reimbursement for prasugrel treatment for one year IF PLATELET FUNCTION TESTING SHOWS HIGH ON-TREATMENT PLATELET REACTIVITY AFTER CLOPIDOGREL. (At the time of this presentation, ticagrelor is not yet reimbursed in Hungary)

HUNGARIAN MODEL : SELECTIVE USE OF PRASUGREL BASED ON MULTIPLATE TESTING 19 cath-labs are using Multiplate in routine to select the P2Y12-receptor antagonist in patients after PCI

25% of patients: Switch to prasugrel 75% of patients: Keep generic clopidogrel

PÉ CS REGISTRY: CLINICAL IMPACT OF THE SELECTIVE USE OF PRASUGREL BASED ON MULTIPLATE TESTING AIMS: to evaluate the clinical and pharmacological impact of selecting P2Y12-inhibitors based on Multiplate testing in consecutive ACS patients after PCI Prespecified cutoff for HPR: ADP-test 47 U Key efficacy outcomes: all-cause mortality, definite/probable ST, MI, stroke. Key safety outcomes: Non surgery related major bleeding (BARC 3/5) INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with ACS undergoing PCI with stent implantation Pretreatment with 600 mg clopidogrel or chronic treatment with clopidogrel (> 5 days) EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Prior intracranial bleeding Indication for chronic oral anticoagulation Pretreated with prasugrel Concurrent study interfering with DAPT

PÉ CS REGISTRY: 1-YEAR RESULTS 2011.09.01-2012.08.31. 1519 ACS patients referred for invasive strategy - CABG: - Medical management: 976 patients: PCI with stenting optional GPI (tirofiban) - Died before platelet function testing: - Enrolled into other studies: - Required Vit. K antagonist: - No platelet function testing: Excluded: 235 6-24 hours after LD (next morning) (24 hs after GPI cessation) 741 patients: Multiplate ADP test 29.6% 70.4% 219 patients: ADP 47 U (HPR) * 522 patients: ADP < 47 U (no HPR) 91 patients: switch to prasugrel 128 patients: Adjusted high-dose clopidogrel Clopidogrel 75 mg *: NON-RANDOM ALLOCATION

RESULTS: BASELINE CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS Overall (n=741) Age (years, ±SD) 62.3 (10.9) Male (n, %) 483 (65.2) Diabetes (n, %) 192 (25.9) Hypertension (n, %) 529 (71.4) Known dyslipidemia (n, %) 174 (23.5) Smoking (n, %) Prior PCI (n, %) Prior CABG (n, %) 146 (19.7) 84 (11.3) 64 (8.6) Prior MI (n, %) 115 (15.5) Troponin positive (n, %) 626 (84.5) STEMI (n, %) 358 (48.3) NSTEMI (n, %) 268 (36.2) UA (n, %) 114 (15.5) Cardiogenic shock (n, %) 33 (4.5) BMS (n, %) 549 (74.1) Total stent length (mean, ±SD) 38.5 (22.9)

RESULTS: BASELINE CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS Overall HPR no HPR P (n=741) (n=219) (n=522) (HPR vs. no HPR) Age (years, ±SD) 62.3 (10.9) 60.8 (10.7) 62,9 (10.9) <0.05 Male (n, %) 483 (65.2) 136 (62.1) 347 (66.5) 0.27 Diabetes (n, %) 192 (25.9) 68 (31.1) 124 (23.8) <0.05 Hypertension (n, %) 529 (71.4) 158 (72.1) 371 (71.1) 0.79 Known dyslipidemia (n, %) 174 (23.5) 46 (21.0) 128 (24.5) 0.34 Smoking (n, %) Prior PCI (n, %) Prior CABG (n, %) 146 (19.7) 41 (18.7) 105 (20.1) 0.69 84 (11.3) 32 (14.6) 52 (10.0) 0.08 64 (8.6) 15 (6.8) 49 (9.4) 0.32 Prior MI (n, %) 115 (15.5) 39 (17.8) 76 (14.6) 0.27 Troponin positive (n, %) 626 (84.5) 192 (87.7) 434 (83.1) 0.15 STEMI (n, %) 358 (48.3) 124 (56.6) 234 (44.8) <0.01 NSTEMI (n, %) 268 (36.2) 68 (31.1) 200 (38.3) 0.07 UA (n, %) 114 (15.5) 27 (12.3) 88 (16.9) 0.15 Cardiogenic shock (n, %) 33 (4.5) 14 (6.4) 19 (3.6) 0.12 BMS (n, %) 549 (74.1) 160 (73.1) 389 (74.5) 0.71 Total stent length (mean, ±SD) 38.5 (22.9) 41.7 (23.9) 37.2 (22.4) 0.01

PLATELET REACTIVITY AFTER PCI (n=741) HPR Adjusted high-dose clopidogrel: repeated 600 mg clopidogrel LD up to 4 times based on PFT + 75/150 mg MD (proposed by Bonello et al.*) Switch to prasugrel 60 mg LD + 10 mg MD no HPR 75 mg generic clopidogrel Aradi et al. JACC 2014. in press. *: Bonello et al. JACC 2008;51:1404-11.

PRASUGREL vs. HIGH-DOSE CLOPIDOGREL Aradi et al. JACC 2014. in press.

1-YEAR CLINICAL RESULTS Overall population (n=741) Efficacy outcomes All-cause death 60 (8.1%) Definite/probable ST 21 (2.8%) Myocardial infarction 42 (5.7%) Stroke 4 (0.5%) TVR 137 (18.5%) Safety outcomes BARC 3 or 5 bleeding 39 (5.3%) Aradi et al. JACC 2014. in press.

1-YEAR CLINICAL RESULTS Overall population (n=741) no HPR (n=522) HPR (n=219) RR (HPR vs. no HPR) P Efficacy outcomes All-cause death 60 (8.1%) 33 (6.3%) 27 (12.3%) 1.95 (1.20-3.16) <0.01 Definite/probable ST 21 (2.8%) 10 (1.9%) 11 (5.0%) 2.62 (1.13-6.09) <0.05 Myocardial infarction 42 (5.7%) 27 (5.2%) 15 (6.9%) 1.32 (0.72-2.44) 0.39 Stroke 4 (0.5%) 3 (0.6%) 1 (0.5%) 0.8 (0.08-7.60) 1.00 TVR 137 (18.5%) 95 (18.2%) 42 (19.2%) 1.05 (0.76-1.46) 0.76 Safety outcomes BARC 3 or 5 bleeding 39 (5.3%) 25 (4.8%) 14 (6.4%) 1.34 (0.71-2.52) 0.38 Aradi et al. JACC 2014. in press.

MORTALITY AND STENT THROMBOSIS HR: 2.94 (1.76 4.94) p < 0.001 HR: 1.12 (0.50 2.51) p = 0.79 Aradi et al. JACC 2014. in press.

Aradi et al. JACC 2014. in press. ISCHEMIC EVENTS

Aradi et al. JACC 2014. in press. MAJOR BLEEDING (BARC 3, 5)

Predictors of D/MI/ST/STROKE @ 1 YEAR Univariate model (HR 95%CI) 1. Cardiogenic shock 15.87 (9.95-25.32) <0.0001 2. Renal failure (stage 4/5) 7.45 (4.28-12.96) <0.0001 3. High-dose clopidogrel, if HPR 2.27 (1.45-3.55) <0.0001 *Prasugrel, if HPR 0.90 (0.44-1.81) 0.76* 4. Leukocyte (per 10 G/l increase) 2.39 (1.70-3.35) <0.0001 5. Insulin-treated diabetes 2.31 (1.35-3.95) 0.002 6. Prior MI 1.92 (1.21-3.06) 0.006 7. STEMI 1.79 (1.18-2.70) 0.006 8. Age (per 10 year increase) 1.69 (1.38-2.06) <0.0001 9. Type II. diabetes 1.57 (1.03-2.39) 0.04 10. No. of stents used (per 1 increase) 1.44 (1.22-1.70) <0.0001 11. Stent length (per 10 mm increase) 1.16 (1.08-1.25) <0.0001 12. CRP (per 10 ng/ml increase) 1.08 (1.05-1.11) <0.0001 13. Creatinin (per 10 mmol/l increase) 1.04 (1.03-1.06) <0.0001 14. Unstable angina 0.22 (0.08-0.60) 0.003 15. DES (vs. BMS) 0.35 (0.19-0.66) 0.001 16. ACEI/ARB 0.39 (0.26-0.59) <0.0001 17. Statin 0.60 (0.33-0.96) 0.03 18. Beta-blocker 0.62 (0.41-0.96) 0.03 19. egfr (per 10 ml/min/1.73m 2 increase) 0.82 (0.77-0.88) <0.0001 20. Hemoglobin (per 10 g/l increase) 0.86 (0.76-0.97) 0.01

Predictors of D/MI/ST/STROKE @ 1 YEAR Univariate model Multivariate model 1. Cardiogenic shock 15.87 (9.95-25.32) <0.0001 9.49 (5.42-16.62) <0.0001 2. Renal failure (stage 4/5) 7.45 (4.28-12.96) <0.0001-3. High-dose clopidogrel, if HPR 2.27 (1.45-3.55) <0.0001 1.90 (1.17-3.08) 0.01 *Prasugrel, if HPR 0.90 (0.44-1.81) 0.76* - 4. Leukocyte (per 10 G/l increase) 2.39 (1.70-3.35) <0.0001 5. Insulin-treated diabetes 2.31 (1.35-3.95) 0.002-6. Prior MI 1.92 (1.21-3.06) 0.006 2.47 (1.46-4.19) 0.001 7. STEMI 1.79 (1.18-2.70) 0.006-8. Age (per 10 year increase) 1.69 (1.38-2.06) <0.0001 1.56 (1.25-1.94) <0.0001 9. Type II. diabetes 1.57 (1.03-2.39) 0.04-10. No. of stents used (per 1 increase) 1.44 (1.22-1.70) <0.0001-11. Stent length (per 10 mm increase) 1.16 (1.08-1.25) <0.0001 1.13 (1.03-1.24) 0.01 12. CRP (per 10 ng/ml increase) 1.08 (1.05-1.11) <0.0001-13. Creatinin (per 10 mmol/l increase) 1.04 (1.03-1.06) <0.0001-14. Unstable angina 0.22 (0.08-0.60) 0.003-15. DES (vs. BMS) 0.35 (0.19-0.66) 0.001 0.38 (0.16-0.89) 0.03 16. ACEI/ARB 0.39 (0.26-0.59) <0.0001 0.45 (0.27-0.72) 0.001 17. Statin 0.60 (0.33-0.96) 0.03-18. Beta-blocker 0.62 (0.41-0.96) 0.03-19. egfr (per 10 ml/min/1.73m 2 increase) 0.82 (0.77-0.88) <0.0001-20. Hemoglobin (per 10 g/l increase) 0.86 (0.76-0.97) 0.01 -

Price MJ et al. JAMA 2011; 305: 1097-105. Collet et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2100-9. Trenk D et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:2159-64.

PFT-GUIDED ANTIPLATELET THERAPY GRAVITAS ARCTIC TRIGGER PCI PÉCS REGISTRY n (study population) 2,214 2,440 423 741 Patient risk profile AMI (%) 10% 27% 0% 84% STEMI (%) 0.4% 0% 0% 48% Shock (%) 0% 0% 0% 4.5% All-cause mortality 0.8% 2% 0% 8.2% Intervention High-dose clopidogrel 100% 80% - 58% High-dose ASA - 45% - - Prasugrel - 12% 100% 42% PFT Assay VerifyNow VerifyNow VerifyNow Multiplate Results 1 Endpoint 2.3% vs. 2.3% 31.1% vs. 34.6% 0.0% vs. 0.5% 16.5% vs. 7.1%** Price MJ et al. JAMA 2011; 305: 1097-105. Collet et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2100-9. Trenk D et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:2159-64.

CONCLUSIONS Integration of the Multiplate into routine clinical workflow to select the optimal P2Y12-inhibitor in ACS is feasible In patients with HPR, 60 mg prasugrel LD achieves quick and potent P2Y12-receptor inhibition that can be maintained in the majority of the patients throughout the chronic phase By giving repeated LDs of clopidogrel, a significant decrease in platelet inhibition can also be achieved, but: It takes longer compared to prasugrel (2-3x 600 mg necessary) It is less potent compared to a 60 mg LD of prasugrel The achieved level of platelet inhibition cannot be maintained by using 75/150 mg MD

CONCLUSIONS In patients with HPR, switching over to prasugrel reduces the risk of D/MI/ST/stroke compared to adjusted high-dose clopidogrel In addition, the risk of severe bleeding was also lower with prasugrel compared to high-dose clopidogrel Further randomized studies need to confirm that tailored P2Y12-inhibitor treatment is as good/better than the unselected use of prasugrel/ticagrelor

Platelet function testing (Multiplate, ADPtest) Medizinische Klinik I ACS patients undergoin g successful PCI R Control group 14 days prasugrel 5/10 mg qd Monitoring group 7 days prasugrel 5/10 mg qd 7 days clopidogrel 75 mg qd HPR ADPtest 46 Units no HPR ADPtest < 46 Units 11 ½ months prasugrel 5/10 mg qd 11 ½ months prasugrel 5/10 mg qd 11 ½ months clopidogrel 75 mg qd Control group: Uniform antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel Monitoring group: Personalized antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or prasugrel

THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION!