JKSS. Aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal symptoms: incidence and associated factors INTRODUCTION

Similar documents
Only Estrogen receptor positive is not enough to predict the prognosis of breast cancer

HORMONAL THERAPY IN ADJUVANT CARE

Clinical activity of fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy and/or chemotherapy

Implications of Progesterone Receptor Status for the Biology and Prognosis of Breast Cancers

Extended Hormonal Therapy

Integrated care: guidance on fracture prevention in cancer-associated bone disease; treatment options

William J. Gradishar MD

UK Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Symposium. Should lobular phenotype be considered when deciding treatment? Michael J Kerin

Emerging Approaches for (Neo)Adjuvant Therapy for ER+ Breast Cancer

Quality of life (QoL) in metastatic breast cancer patients with. maintenance paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PG) chemotherapy:

BREAST CANCER AND BONE HEALTH

Watchful Waiting: Well Behaved Breast Cancers Non-Surgical Management of Breast Cancer

Breast Cancer and Bone Loss. One in seven women will develop breast cancer during a lifetime

Scottish Medicines Consortium

ATAC Trial. 10 year median follow-up data. Approval Code: AZT-ARIM-10005

Study Of Letrozole Extension. Coordinating Group IBCSG IBCSG BIG 1-07

The efficacy of second-line hormone therapy for recurrence during adjuvant hormone therapy for breast cancer

Bad to the bones: treatments for breast and prostate cancer

Breast Cancer? Breast cancer is the most common. What s New in. Janet s Case

4.7 Studies of Quality Holy Cross Hospital Bone Health Early Stage I ER/PR Positive Breast Cancer Patients December 13, 2017

Breast Cancer. Dr. Andres Wiernik 2017

Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Distant Metastasis Following Loco-Regional Recurrence of breast cancer. Cheol Min Kang 2018/04/05

Aromatase Inhibitors & Osteoporosis

ORMONOTERAPIA ADIUVANTE: QUALE LA DURATA OTTIMALE? MARIANTONIETTA COLOZZA

Introduction. Wilfred Truin 1 Rudi M. H. Roumen. Vivianne C. G. Tjan-Heijnen 2 Adri C. Voogd

Seigo Nakamura,M.D.,Ph.D.

Breast Cancer. Most common cancer among women in the US. 2nd leading cause of death in women. Mortality rates though have declined

Poor prognosis of single hormone receptorpositive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer

Hormone therapy in Breast Cancer patients with comorbidities

Progesterone receptor status in determining the prognosis of estrogen receptor positive/ HER2 negative breast carcinoma patients

It is a malignancy originating from breast tissue

Efficacy of Letrozole as First-Line Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in Korea

Evaluation the Correlation between Ki67 and 5 Years Disease Free Survival of Breast Cancer Patients

A Slow Starvation: Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy of Breast Cancer

Audit. Public Health Monitoring Report on 2006 Data. National Breast & Ovarian Cancer Centre and Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Breast Cancer. Saima Saeed MD

Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy: How Long is Long Enough?

Breast cancer treatment

Coexistence of parathyroid adenoma and papillary thyroid carcinoma. Yong Sang Lee, Kee-Hyun Nam, Woong Youn Chung, Hang-Seok Chang, Cheong Soo Park


Predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer: The impact of chemotherapeutic regimen

Best of San Antonio 2008

Figure 1: PALLAS Study Schema. Endocrine adjuvant therapy may have started before randomization and be ongoing at that time.

Medical Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

Issues in Cancer Survivorship. Larissa A. Korde, MD, MPH June 26, 2010

Effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen in reducing subsequent breast cancer

Follow-up Care of Breast Cancer Patients

Journal of Breast Cancer

Long term survival study of de-novo metastatic breast cancers with or without primary tumor resection

J Clin Oncol 23: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Manejo do câncer de mama RH+ na adjuvância: o que há de novo?

Clinical outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients

Long-Term Survival Analysis of Korean Breast Cancer Patients at a Single Center: Improving Outcome Over Time

Hot Topics in Bone Disease in 2017: Building Better Bones Breaking News in Osteoporosis

Breast Cancer Basics. Clinical Oncology for Public Health Professionals. Ben Ho Park, MD, PhD

Adjuvant Systemic Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer

Choosing between different hormonal therapies. Rudy Van den Broecke UZ Ghent

Oncotype DX testing in node-positive disease

Intro to Cancer Therapeutics

Analysis of the outcome of young age tongue squamous cell carcinoma

SYSTEMIC THERAPY OPTIONS FOR BREAST CANCER IN 2014

Systemic Treatment of Breast Cancer. Hormone Therapy and Chemotherapy, Curative and Palliative

Factors predictive of myoinvasion in cases of Complex Atypical Hyperplasia diagnosed on endometrial biopsy or curettage

Impact of BMI on pathologic complete response (pcr) following neo adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced breast cancer

A Survey of Joint and Muscle Aches, Pain, and Stiffness Comparing Women With and Without Breast Cancer

My Personalized Breast Cancer Worksheet

OPTIMAL ENDOCRINE THERAPY IN EARLY BREAST CANCER

Podcast ESMO 2011: The Tamoxifen- Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) Phase III Breast Cancer Trial Results

Start strong or switch? Adjuvant endocrine strategies for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer

Osteoporosis management in cancer patients

Are there the specific prognostic factors for triplenegative subtype of early breast cancers (pt1-2n0m0)?

Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial

Journal of Breast Cancer

Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy. Mike Dixon Clinical Director Breakthrough Research Unit Edinburgh

Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy. 10 Lessons Learnt from Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy. Lesson 1

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (essentials in ER positive early breast cancer)

The Oncotype DX Assay in the Contemporary Management of Invasive Early-stage Breast Cancer

Identification of the Risk Factors of Bone Metastatic among Breast Cancer Women in Al-Bashir Hospital

Luminal early breast cancer: (neo-) adjuvant endocrine therapy

PMRT for N1 breast cancer :CONS. Won Park, M.D., Ph.D Department of Radiation Oncology Samsung Medical Center

Beyond the Break. After Breast Cancer: Osteoporosis in Survivorship. Dr Alexandra Ginty CCFP(EM) FCFP Regional Primary Care Lead CCO

8/8/2011. PONDERing the Need to TAILOR Adjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ Node Positive Breast Cancer. Overview

Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with metastatic cancer

An updated review on the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapies in hormone receptor positive early breast cancer

Giuseppe Viale for the BIG 1 98 Collaborative and International Breast Cancer Study Groups

ORIGINAL ARTICLE BREAST ONCOLOGY. Ann Surg Oncol (2017) 24: DOI /s x

The first randomized clinical trial of adjuvant

W3C Life Sciences: Clinical Observations Interoperability: EMR + Clinical Trials Use-case for EMR + Clinical Trials Interoperability

Hormonal therapies for the adjuvant treatment of early oestrogenreceptor-positive

Treatment Results and Prognostic Factors of Early Breast Cancer Treated with a Breast Conserving Operation and Radiotherapy

Systemic Management of Breast Cancer

Name of Active Ingredient: Fully human monoclonal antibody to receptor activator for nuclear factor-κb ligand

Locoregional treatment Session Oral Abstract Presentation Saulo Brito Silva

Breast Cancer Breast Managed Clinical Network

Breast Cancer Earlier Disease. Stefan Aebi Luzerner Kantonsspital

Endocrine Therapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer

The Role of Diuretics in Treatment of Aromatase Inhibitors Induced Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Women with Non Metastatic Breast Cancer

The effect of anastrozole on bone mineral density during the first 5 years of adjuvant treatment in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

BreastScreen Aotearoa Annual Report 2015

Transcription:

ORIGINAL ARTICLE pissn 2233-7903 eissn 2093-0488 Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal symptoms: incidence and associated factors Jin Young Park*, Se Kyung Lee*, Soo Youn Bae, Jiyoung Kim, Min Kuk Kim, Won Ho Kil, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Jin Nam Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Purpose: Arthralgia is the most common side effect in breast cancer patients receiving aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Few studies have evaluated the risk factors, onset, and incidence of musculoskeletal pain in these patients. This study identifies the risk factors of AI-related severe arthralgia and their prevalence. Methods: All the clinical and pathological records of postmenopausal patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer using AI at Samsung Medical Center from January 2005 to November 2007 were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors of AI-associated musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS) and factors associated with AI discontinuance. Results: Among 299 patients, 69 patients (23%) experienced musculoskeletal symptoms attributed to AI use. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, no statistically significant outcome was found to confirm the risk factors for the development of AIMSS. Among the 69 patients who experienced AI-associated musculoskeletal symptoms, 29 (39.7%) discontinued AI use. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed an association of prior tamoxifen use with discontinuance of AI (P < 0.01; odds ratio, 4.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.74 to 10.50). Conclusion: Prior use of tamoxifen is related to discontinuation of AI due to AI-associated severe arthralgia. Special monitoring and proper pain control for these patients should be considered during the treatment period. Corresponding Author Seok Jin Nam Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Sur gery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea Tel: +82-2-3410-3478 Fax: +82-2-3410-6982 E-mail: seokjin.nam@samsung.com *These authors contributed equally to this study and should be considered co-first authors. Key Words Aromatase inhibitors, Aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal symptoms, Prior tamoxifen INTRODUCTION Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have become a necessary part of standard adjuvant hormonal therapy that significantly reduces the risk of recurrence for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive invasive breast cancer. However, breast cancer patients receiving AI therapy show a higher incidence of AIassociated musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS). The incidence of AIMSS in phase III clinical trials of anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane has been recently reviewed; women receiving these drugs experienced significantly higher rates of arthralgia than women who received tamoxifen [1]. In a study investigating arthralgia in 200 patients receiving AI therapy, 47% of the patients reported AI-related joint pain and 44% reported stiffness [2]. Typically, patients experience stiffness, achiness, or pain, which is frequently symmetric, occurring in the hands, arms, knees, feet, and pelvic and hip bones [3]. The few studies that have assessed the risk factors for the development of AIMSS (regardless of whether patients were on anastrozole or tamoxifen) looked into previous chemotherapy, previous hormone replacement Received May 14, 2013 Revised August 16, 2013 Accepted August 22, 2013 J Korean Surg Soc 2013;85:205-211 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.5.205 Copyright 2013, the Korean Surgical Society cc Journal of the Korean Surgical Society is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 205

Table 1. Analysis of risk factors for the development of AIMSS Symptom Asymptomatic P-value OR (95% CI) P-value Total 69 230 Age (yr) 0.52 <55 19 (28) 54 (74) 1.00-55 50 (72) 176 (76) 1.26 (0.60 2.64) 0.54 Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 0.90 <23 25 (36) 82 (36) 1.09 (0.54 2.19) 0.82 23, <30 18 (26) 55 (24) 1.13 (0.55 2.32) 0.74 30 26 (38) 93 (40) 1.00 - Femur T score 0.02 Normal (T 1.0 ) 41 (59) 94 (41) 1.388 (0.34 5.75) 0.65 Osteopenia ( 2.5 < T < 1.0 ) 25 (36) 125 (54) 0.644 (0.16 2.66) 0.54 Osteoporosis (T 2.5 ) 3 (4) 11 (5) 1.00 - Radiotherapy 0.88 Yes 50 (72) 162 (70) 1.041 (0.51 1.80) 0.90 No 19 (28) 68 (30) 1.00 - Chemotherapy 0.19 Yes 58 (84) 174 (76) 1.00 - No 11 (16) 56 (24) 1.503 (0.67 3.39) 0.33 Chemotherapy regimen 0.27 Taxane 37 (53) 141 (61) 1.00 0.10 None taxane 32 (46) 89 (39) 1.293 (0.70 2.41) - Prior tamoxifen 0.07 Yes 25 (36) 57 (25) No 44 (64) 173 (75) Trastuzumab 0.20 Yes 1 (1) 13 (5) 4.388 (0.55 34.87) 0.16 No 68 (99) 217 (95) 1.00 - TNM 0.50 NA NA I 30 (43) 85 (37) II 31 (45) 107 (47) II 8 (12) 38 (16) Histology 0.86 NA NA IDC 60 (87) 199 (87) ILC 2 (3) 10 (4) Mucinous 2 (3) 9 (3) Others 5 (7) 12 (6) Estrogen receptor 0.23 NA NA Positive 67 (97) 228 (99) Negative 2 (2) 2 (1) (Continued to the next page) 206 thesurgery.or.kr

Table 1. Continued Symptom Asymptomatic P-value OR (95% CI) P-value Progesterone receptor 0.56 NA NA Positive 61 (88) 195 (84) Negative 8 (12) 35 (15) HER2 0.04 NA NA Positive 4 (6) 35 (15) Negative 65 (94) 195 (85) LV invasion 0.02 NA NA Positive 16 (23) 88 (38) Negative 53 (77) 142 (62) Multiplicity 1.00 NA NA Single 58 (84) 192 (83) Multiple 11 (16) 38 (17) Nuclear grade 0.15 NA NA Low 17 (25) 64 (28) Intermediate 39 (57) 101 (44) High 13 (19) 65 (28) Values are presented as number (%). AIMSS, aromatase inhibitor associated musculoskeletal symptom; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC, invasive lobular carcinoma; HER2, human epidermal growth factor 2; LV, lymphovascular; NA, not analyzed. therapy, hormone receptor positivity, obesity, and prior taxane therapy [1,2]. AIMSS could appreciably affect quality of life, adherence behavior, and potential survival benefit derived from AIs; further research is needed to better define the characteristics of AIMSS to help guide interventions. Thus, the objective of our study was to identify the clinical and pathological risk factors for the development of AIMSS and associated factors with severe AIMSS that prompt cessation of AI therapy. METHODS Patients and characteristics The medical records of 299 postmenopausal women patients with hormone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer treated with AI at the Breast Division of the General Surgery Department from January 2005 to November 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were taking a third generation nonsteroidal AI (anastrozole or letrozole) for 5 years, or were switched to an AI after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen treatment. Patients with no evidence of metastatic or recurrent disease, previous or concurrent cancer, and prior/ current cancer treatment including chemotherapy and radiation therapy were excluded. Severe AIMSS was defined as a pain level where patients desired to ease of AI use. Bone mineral density (BMD) needed to have been performed within 3 months before or after reporting of AIMSS. Body mass index (BMI: calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in square meters) and T score of femur head or shaft were analyzed. Patients with a BMI between 18.5 and 22.9 kg/m 2 were considered to be of normal weight, between 23 and 24.99 kg/m 2 overweight, and over 25 kg/m 2 obese, according to Korean Society for The Study of Obesity. Information concerning AIMSS and AI discontinuation was collected from the medical records. The pathological data were collected by a pathological chart review. Pathological records included stage at diagnosis, operation name, laterality, performance of axillary lymph node dissection, hormone receptor status, lymphovascular invasion, multiplicity, and nuclear grade. Statistical analyses All statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS ver. 18.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables were compared by using the chi-square or Fisher exact test: Discontinuation of AI therapy due to AIMSS, clinical characteristics and pathological status. Probability values < 0.05 were considered significant. Multivariate logistic regression while controlling for all confounding variables was used to Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 207

evaluate the risk factors for the development of AIMSS and discontinuation of AI therapy due to severe AIMSS. RESULTS Incidence of AIMSS From January 2005 to November 2007, 299 patients were enrolled. Baseline clinical and pathological characteristic are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The median age of the women enrolled was 60 years (range, 47 to 87 years). Of the total patients, 69 patients (23%) reported having AIMSS. Among these 69 patients, 29 (39.7%) discontinued AI therapy due to severe AIMSS. Onset of AIMSS Among the 69 patients, the onset of AIMSS was noted in six patients (9%) within a month of starting therapy, 18 (26%) within the first 3 months, 11 (16%) within the first 6 months, and 34 (49%) after 6 months. Thus, approximately 50% of the patients experienced AIMSS within 6 months after the onset of therapy. Risk factors for the development of AIMSS In univariate analysis, the presence of AIMSS was associated with femur T score and negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor status. However, there was no association with age, BMI, BMD, operation type and laterality, axillary lymph node dissection, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, TNM stage, hormonal re ceptor (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR]) status, lymphovascular invasion, multiplicity, nuclear grade, and prior tamoxifen use. AIMSS was associated with normal femur T score and negative HER2 receptor status (Table 1). Multivariable logistic regression analysis with clinical factors for presence of AIMSS did not reveal any significant associations (Table 1). Risk factors for discontinuation of AI therapy due to severe AIMSS indicated that discontinuance of AI therapy was not associated with age, BMI, BMD, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, TNM stage, hormonal receptor (ER, PR, and HER2) status, lymphovascular invasion, multiplicity, and nuclear grade. Women with prior use of tamoxifen displayed a significant tendency toward AI discontinuation due to AIMSS (P = 0.01) (Table 2). Multivariate logistic regression with clinical factors showed a relation between prior tamoxifen use and discontinuation of AI (P < 0.01; odds ratio, 4.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.74 to 10.50) due to severe AIMSS (Table 2). DISCUSSION Large clinical trials evaluating AI (anastrozole in Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination [ATAC] [4], letrozole in Breast International Group1-98 [5], and exemetane in the International Exemestane Study [2]) have reported arthralgia rates ranging from 5.4% to 35.6%. A small study carried out before the routine use of AI as an adjuvant treatment reported an incidence of pain ranging from 10% to 15% [6]. Our study showed a similar result (69 patients, 23%). A retrospective analysis of 600 patients who received adjuvant AI therapy showed 20% self-reported arthralgia/arthritis; notably, 17% of the patients discontinued AI therapy, which was attributable to arthralgia in 46% of the cases [7], and 45.4% developed AIMSS, which met the criterion for rheumatology referral [1]. Our study showed similar results (29 patients, with 39.7% discontinuing AI therapy due to severe AIMSS). In several studies the majority of patients (75%) developed symptoms within 3 months of starting therapy [8,9]. In a prospective evaluation of AIMSS that developed in women treated with AI, the median time to onset of symptoms was 1.6 months and 13% of patients discontinued AI therapy after a median of 6.1 months secondary to musculoskeletal toxicity [8]. Also, The ATAC trial reported that the peak occurrence for AIMSS was 6 months [1]. Our study was consistent with previously published studies that have demonstrated 50% experienced AIMSS within 6 months after the onset of therapy. Several studies have evaluated the risk factors associated with AIMSS. The results have not been consistent. Part of the ATAC trial was carried out looking for risk factors for development of AIMSS in 1,921 patients. Prior use of hormone replacement therapy, obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m 2 ), prior chemotherapy, geographic region (higher in North America, lower in the United Kingdom), and positive hormone receptor status are all associated with a higher risk of AIMSS [1]. Another study examined 200 patients of consecutive postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant AI therapy for early stage hormone sensitive breast cancer. The authors reported an increased risk of AIMSS in patients who received prior taxane chemotherapy (four-times more likely to develop symptoms) and associated with BMI [2]. In this study, BMI, prior chemotherapy and hormone receptor status were not related with AIMSS. Our study showed that AIMSS was associated with HER2 negative status in univariate analysis. HER2 status was just a pathologic result which was not related with clinical outcome. Therefore, we analyzed with the factor of trastuzumab use in multivariate analysis. In this analysis, there was not associated with administered trastuzumab. The significant association between AIMSS and BMD has 208 thesurgery.or.kr

Table 2. Analysis of risk factors for discontinuation of AI therapy due to severe AIMSS Stop (+) Stop (-) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value Total 40 29 Age (yr) 0.60 <55 9 (31) 10 (25) 1.00-55 20 (69) 30 (75) 1.59 (0.56 4.482) 0.38 Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 0.50 <23 13 (45) 12 (30) 1.00-23, <30 7 (24) 11 (28) 1.30 (0.46 3.64) 0.62 30 9 (31) 17 (42) 1.15 (0.89 3.40) 0.80 Femur T score 0.15 Normal (T 1.0 ) 16 (55) 25 (62) 1.00 - Osteopenia ( 2.5 < T < 1.0 ) 10 (35) 15 (38) 0.57 (0.23 1.38) 0.21 Osteoporosis (T 2.5 ) 3 (10) 0 (0) 2.47 (0.50 12.22) 0.27 RTx 1.00 Yes 21 (72) 29 (72) 1.00 - No 8 (28) 11 (28) 1.07 (0.43 2.68) 0.88 CTx 1.00 Yes 24 (83) 34 (85) 1.00 - No 5 (17) 6 (15) 0.71 (0.22 2.34) 0.63 Chemotherapy regimen 1.00 Taxane 16 (55) 21 (52) 1.25 (0.51 3.06) 0.63 None taxane 13 (45) 19 (48) 1.00 - Prior tamoxifen 0.01 Yes 16 (55) 9 (22) 4.27 (1.74 10.50) <0.01 No 13 (45) 31 (78) 1.00 - Trastuzumab 0.38 Yes 0 (0) 1 (3) 1.88 (0) 0.99 No 29 (100) 39 (97) 1.00 - TNM 0.43 NA NA I 19 (48) 11 (38) II 18 (45) 13 (45) III 3 (7) 5 (17) Histology 0.28 NA NA IDC 37 (94) 23 (80) ILC 1 (2) 1 (3) Mucinous 1 (2) 1 (3) Others 1 (2) 4 (14) Estrogen receptor 1.00 NA NA Positive 28 (97) 39 (98) Negative 1 (3) 1 (2) (Continued to the next page) Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 209

Table 2. Continued Stop (+) Stop (-) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value Progesterone receptor 1.00 NA NA Positive 26 (90) 35 (88) Negative 3 (10) 5 (12) Estrogen receptor 0.13 NA NA Positive 0 (0) 4 (10) Negative 29 (100) 36 (90) LV invasion 0.39 NA NA Positive 11 (28) 5 (17) Negative 29 (72) 24 (83) Multiplicity 0.04 NA NA Single 37 (92) 21 (72) Multiple 3 (8) 8 (28) Nuclear grade 0.32 NA NA Low 10 (25) 7 (24) Intermediate 25 (63) 14 (48) High 5 (12) 8 (28) Values are presented as number (%). AIMSS, aromatase inhibitor associated musculoskeletal symptom; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC, invasive lobular carcinoma; HER2, human epidermal growth factor 2; LV, lymphovascular; NA, not analyzed. been reported with severe degree of symptoms [10]. AIMSS is related with a significantly increased likelihood of having abnormal BMD [10]. Worsening bone health including osteopenia and osteoporosis is increased by AI treatment [11,12]. In our study, while AIMSS was associated with normal BMD range in univariate analysis, there was no association with BMD in multivariate analysis. We found a greater than four-fold increased risk factor for discontinuance of AI due to severe AIMSS in patients who received prior tamoxifen therapy. The present study is the first report that discontinuation of AI therapy may be exacerbated by prior tamoxifen therapy. Prior tamoxifen use could be a real cause of severe AIMSS. However, this might cause an easy change to another drug (e.g., tamoxifen). There are various ongoing studies in progress at ClinicalTrial.gov (http:// clinicaltrials.gov/). Further associated factors of AIMSS will hopefully be revealed soon. A limitation of this study is the retrospective design, which introduced the possibility of selection bias. Due to the limitation of a measurement tool for AIMSS, we relied on self-reporting for measurement of AIMSS. Therefore, the measurement of AIMSS of our study could not be standardized. In conclusion, there is no significant result concerning risk factors for the development of AIMSS. Furthermore, prior use of tamoxifen was related to discontinuance of AI due to severe AIMSS. Special monitoring and proper pain control for these patients should be considered during the treatment period. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. REFERENCES 1. Sestak I, Cuzick J, Sapunar F, Eastell R, Forbes JF, Bianco AR, et al. Risk factors for joint symptoms in patients enrolled in the ATAC trial: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:866-72. 2. Crew KD, Greenlee H, Capodice J, Raptis G, Brafman L, Fuentes D, et al. Prevalence of joint symptoms in postmenopausal women taking aromatase inhibitors for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3877-83. 3. Din OS, Dodwell D, Wakefield RJ, Coleman RE. Aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in early breast cancer: what do we know and how can we find out more? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;120:525-38. 210 thesurgery.or.kr

4. Howell A, Cuzick J, Baum M, Buzdar A, Dowsett M, Forbes JF, et al. Results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial after completion of 5 years' adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Lancet 2005;365:60-2. 5. Coates AS, Keshaviah A, Thurlimann B, Mouridsen H, Mauriac L, Forbes JF, et al. Five years of letrozole compared with tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: update of study BIG 1-98. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:486-92. 6. Donnellan PP, Douglas SL, Cameron DA, Leonard RC. Aromatase inhibitors and arthralgia. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2767. 7. Dent SF, Hopkins S, Di Valentin T, Verreault J, Vandermeer L, Verma S. Adjuvant aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer - toxicity and adherence. Important observations in clinical practice. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007;106:S111. 8. Henry NL, Giles JT, Ang D, Mohan M, Dadabhoy D, Robarge J, et al. Prospective characterization of musculoskeletal symptoms in early stage breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;111:365-72. 9. Mao JJ, Stricker C, Bruner D, Xie S, Bowman MA, Farrar JT, et al. Patterns and risk factors associated with aromatase inhibitorrelated arthralgia among breast cancer survivors. Cancer 2009;115:3631-9. 10. Muslimani AA, Spiro TP, Chaudhry AA, Taylor HC, Jaiyesimi I, Daw HA. Aromatase inhibitor-related musculoskeletal symptoms: is preventing osteoporosis the key to eliminating these symptoms? Clin Breast Cancer 2009;9:34-8. 11. Mincey BA, Duh MS, Thomas SK, Moyneur E, Marynchencko M, Boyce SP, et al. Risk of cancer treatment-associated bone loss and fractures among women with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitors. Clin Breast Cancer 2006;7:127-32. 12. Confavreux CB, Fontana A, Guastalla JP, Munoz F, Brun J, Delmas PD. Estrogen-dependent increase in bone turnover and bone loss in postmenopausal women with breast cancer treated with anastrozole. Prevention with bisphosphonates. Bone 2007;41:346-52. Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 211