CHAPTER 3. Methodology

Similar documents
P H E N O M E N O L O G Y

Chapter 4 Research Methodology

Principles of Sociology

Research Methodology in Social Sciences. by Dr. Rina Astini

CHAPTER 3 METHOD AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 3. Research Methodology. This chapter mentions the outline of research methodology and gives

Research Ethics and Philosophies

Benefits and constraints of qualitative and quantitative research methods in economics and management science

LAST LECTURE. What Do Sociologists Do? Forms of Truth. What Is a Valid Sociological Topic? Any kind of human behaviour & social interaction

CHAPTER 2 APPLYING SCIENTIFIC THINKING TO MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS

Raya Abu-Tawileh. Dana Alrafaiah. Hamza Alduraidi. 1 P a g e

POLI 343 Introduction to Political Research

BIOSTATISTICS. Dr. Hamza Aduraidi

METHODOLOGY FOR DISSERTATION

CHAPTER VI RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

1 Qualitative Research and Its Use in Sport and Physical Activity

PLANNING THE RESEARCH PROJECT

The role of philosophical context in the development of research methodology and theory

Psy2005: Applied Research Methods & Ethics in Psychology. Week 14: An Introduction to Qualitative Research


Running head: Investigating the merit of discreetness in health care services targeting young men. Edvard K.N. Karlsen

Choosing a Research Approach

Social Research Strategies

A to Z OF RESEARCH METHODS AND TERMS APPLICABLE WITHIN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH

Formulation of Research Design

Definition of Scientific Research RESEARCH METHODOLOGY CHAPTER 2 SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION. The Hallmarks of Scientific Research

The Significance of Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems Research

PARADIGMS, THEORY AND SOCIAL RESEARCH

Funnelling Used to describe a process of narrowing down of focus within a literature review. So, the writer begins with a broad discussion providing b

Thinking Like a Researcher

Psych 1Chapter 2 Overview

Chapter 3 Tools for Practical Theorizing: Theoretical Maps and Ecosystem Maps

10 Human Resource Management Research Methods

Qualitative Data Analysis. Richard Boateng, PhD. Arguments with Qualitative Data. Office: UGBS RT18 (rooftop)

CHAPTER 2: SOCIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION

Chapter 02. Basic Research Methodology

Research and science: Qualitative methods

Research Methodologies

Chapter 02 Lecture Outline

Introduction to the Scientific Method. Knowledge and Methods. Methods for gathering knowledge. method of obstinacy

SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH PART I. If you've got the truth you can demonstrate it. Talking doesn't prove it. Robert A. Heinlein

Coordinating Management disciplines to write the Philosophical, Logical and Theoretical Paradigms in Postgraduate Research

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The Role of Qualitative Research in Agri-Food Systems

In this second module, we will focus on features that distinguish quantitative and qualitative research projects.

Cognitive domain: Comprehension Answer location: Elements of Empiricism Question type: MC

ch1 1. What is the relationship between theory and each of the following terms: (a) philosophy, (b) speculation, (c) hypothesis, and (d) taxonomy?

COURSE: NURSING RESEARCH CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION

Instructor s Test Bank. Social Research Methods

Research Methodology

Chapter 1 Introduction to Educational Research

Chapter 1 Social Science and Its Methods

INTRODUCTION. Evidence standards for justifiable evidence claims, June 2016

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, EPISTEMOLOGY, PARADIGM, &THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

The Scientific Method. Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science. Epistemology: the philosophy of knowledge

Realism and Qualitative Research. Joseph A. Maxwell George Mason University

BIOSTATISTICS. Mahmoud Al Hussami, PhD., DSc. Associate Professor of Epidemiology

The Scientific Method

What Is Science? Lesson Overview. Lesson Overview. 1.1 What Is Science?

Glossary of Research Terms Compiled by Dr Emma Rowden and David Litting (UTS Library)

Chapter-2 RESEARCH DESIGN

positivist phenomenological

Correlating Trust with Signal Detection Theory Measures in a Hybrid Inspection System

Conducting Research in the Social Sciences. Rick Balkin, Ph.D., LPC-S, NCC

Group Assignment #1: Concept Explication. For each concept, ask and answer the questions before your literature search.

SFHAI1 Use recognised theoretical models to provide therapeutic support to individuals who misuse substances

THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: COMPARISON AND COMPLIMENTARY BETWEEN QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES

Beyond Subjective and Objective in Statistics

How do we identify a good healthcare provider? - Patient Characteristics - Clinical Expertise - Current best research evidence

Basics of philosophy of science

GENDER-SPECIFIC INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOUR

Choosing an Approach for a Quantitative Dissertation: Strategies for Various Variable Types

Theoretical Perspectives in the PhD thesis: How many? Dr. Terence Love We-B Centre School of Management Information Systems Edith Cowan University

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts (Albert Einstein)

DOING SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH C H A P T E R 3

Qualitative Research. Prof Jan Nieuwenhuis. You can learn a lot just by watching

Qualitative Research Theoretical Orientations. ScWk 240 Week 10 Slides

THE RESEARCH ENTERPRISE IN PSYCHOLOGY

Sense-making Approach in Determining Health Situation, Information Seeking and Usage

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS 3000 ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS OTHER THAN AUDITS OR REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONTENTS

MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2011 question paper for the guidance of teachers 9699 SOCIOLOGY

Chapter 1. Research : A way of thinking

Doing High Quality Field Research. Kim Elsbach University of California, Davis

providers in these settings face in adhering to guidelines for evaluating patients for TB. We identified diagnostic guideline adherence and

Test Bank Questions for Chapter 1

Chapter 1. Research : A way of thinking

TIPSHEET QUESTION WORDING

Myth One: The Scientific Method

DOWNLOAD OR READ : PHENOMENOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY THEORY RESEARCH AND METHOD PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

CHAPTER 5: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

PROPOSAL DEFENSE MECHANISM FOR POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS:

Response to the ASA s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose

Styles of research in ergonomics 1

Review of Veterinary Epidemiologic Research by Dohoo, Martin, and Stryhn

1. Which type of research is constrained by ethical considerations? C. The events in the scientific world are unpredictable

Statistical analysis DIANA SAPLACAN 2017 * SLIDES ADAPTED BASED ON LECTURE NOTES BY ALMA LEORA CULEN

CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Qualitative Research Design

Research Approach & Design. Awatif Alam MBBS, Msc (Toronto),ABCM Professor Community Medicine Vice Provost Girls Section

Transcription:

CHAPTER 3 Methodology The purpose of this chapter is to provide the research methodology which was designed to achieve the objectives of this study. It is important to select appropriate method to ensure the validity and accuracy of data and findings. This chapter will show the method chosen, the instruments used to collect data, the data analysis and the sampling process. Relevant data was gathered by questionnaires. This chapter offer research methodology of the study. This includes the topic such as research philosophy, population, sample size, research hypotheses, research device and measurement of questionnaires, data collection and analysis techniques. Details will be described in latter part of as follows: 3.1 Research Philosophy Research philosophy depends on the researcher s way of thoughts, how the development of knowledge is being implemented. There are two main views of research philosophy which are positivism and phenomenology (Saunders et al, 2007). Saunders et al (2007) also mentioned that both philosophies are different, nevertheless, both philosophies develop knowledge that play important role in management of research. Positivist adopt the philosophical stance of the natural scientist. Remeniyi et al, (1998, p32 cited Saunders et al (2007, p 103)) mentioned that positivist prefer working with observable social reality that end product of such research can be law like generalisations similar to those produced by the physical and natural scientists. Hussey and Hussey (1997) also support that positivism try to find the facts or causes of social phenomena. Phenomenologist arguments positivist that social world of company and organization is too difficult to describe assumption in the same way as the material sciences (Saunders et al, 2007). Hence, the phenomenological concept is focused on relaizing human behaviour from the applicant s own frame of reference (Collis and Hussey, 2003). The table on next page will show the differences. 1

Table 3.1 Comparison between Positivistic Paradigm and Phenomenological Paradigm Positivistic Paradigm Phenomenological Paradigm Produce Quantitative Data Produce Qualitative Data Concerned with Hypothesis Testing Concerned with generating Theories Use Large Samples Use small Samples High Reliability Low Reliability Low Validity High Validity Data is Highly Specific and Precise Data is rich and subjective Source: Collis and Hussey (2003) Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and post graduate student 2 nd ed., p.55 This research paper will be using positivistic paradigm as research philosophy in order to study the factor that effect the purchasing of tailor made suit at Bill International Bespoke Tailor. The main reason for choosing this approach is because this paper will be testing hypothesis. Also, the aim of this research paper is to get the high reliable result as the data is highly specific and precise so that future research on this similar topic can rely on this research paper. 3.2 Research Approach According to Saunders et al. (2007), there are two research approaches including deductive and inductive. The deductive approach is a theory and hypotheses are developed and also research strategies are design to test hypothesis. On the other hand, inductive is the approach that the researchers gather the data and develop theories due to the data analysis. As Ghauri and Gronhaug (2005) mentioned that the researchers draw a conclusion through logical reason in deductive approach. Moreover, the researchers realize hypothesis from existing knowledge which can be tested and decided whether to accept or reject. This approach is often involved with the quantitative research. However, the inductive approach is general conclusions are described from empirical observation by researchers. Also, the 2

inductive approach processes are observation, findings and theories blebuilding. This approach is involved with qualitative research ( Bryman and Bell, 2003 cited Ghauri and Gronhaug, 2005). Table 3.2: Comparison between Deductive and Inductive Approaches Scientific Theories Deductive Approach Inductive Appraoch Achieving and understanding of the meaning human attach to events Moving from Theory to Data Group of Quantitative A close understanding of the research context Collection of Qualitative The application of controls to ensure validity of data Need to Clarify causal relationship between variables A more flexible structure to permit changes of research to emphasize as the research progress A realisation that is research is part of the research process A highly Structured approach Researcher is independence Less Concern with need to generalise The necessities of selecting sample of sufficient size in order to generalise conclusion Source: Saunders et al. (2007). Research Methods for Business Student 4 th ed., p.120 In this research deductive approach applied to reach the research objective because the researcher is doing it based on theory and develop the hypothesis to test. Also, deductive research is the following positivism as deductive approach owes more to positivism philosophy (Saunders et al., 2009). 3

3.3 Population and Sample Size This research use non probability sampling method, the sample selected based on the convenience sampling in order to make it easy to obtain information quickly. All respondents are selected from Bill International Bespoke Tailors customer database. Target customer age more than 18 years old who use service at the shop. The customer database of Bill International Bespoke Tailor has 2,854 persons. Normally in small scale research 30-250 respondents are commonly collected (Denscomber, 2010). For this research 200 questionnaires were distributed through walk in clients and email survey. 3.4 Research Instruments Research tool uses questionnaire, it is defined by Johnson & Christensen (2004) as a self-report data collection device that each research participant fills out as part of a research study. The researchers apply the questionnaires as a data collecting instrument for this research because it is generally used to obtain information, often numeral data. Moreover it can be damaged without the presence of the researcher, which help saving time and suitable for collecting information from large number of samples. The questionnaires also provide relatively straightforward information to analyze (Cohen&Manion&Morrission, 2000). The researcher designs the questionnaire in agreement with objectives and the research framework. It consists of 4 parts as follow:- Part 1: Behavior of using tailor made suit, this part is testing customer viewing behavior and interest, this part will comprise of 4 close-end questions Part 2: Product related criteria influencing customers towards buying tailor made suit at Bill International Bespoke Tailor. This part is comprised of 8 main factors as shown in figure 2.3. Rating scale applied for measurement level of importance. 1= strongly disagree, least important 2 = disagree, less important 3 = neither agree nor disagree, moderate important 4 = agree, very important 5 = strongly agree, most important 4

Part 3: User related criteria influencing customers toward buying tailor made suit at Bill International Bespoke Tailor. This part is comprised of 4 main factors, cultural factor, social factor and psychology factor. Rating scale applied for measurement level of importance. 1= strongly disagree, least important 2 = disagree, less important 3 = neither agree nor disagree, moderate important 4 = agree, very important 5 = strongly agree, most important Part 4: Respondent s characteristic, this part is questions about the respondent s personal factor such as gender, age, income, education, marital status and occupation. This part is comprised of 5 close-end questions. 5