Phase 1 Study Combining Anti-PD-L1 (MEDI4736) With BRAF (Dabrafenib) and/or MEK (Trametinib) Inhibitors in Advanced Melanoma

Similar documents
Melanoma. Il parere dell esperto. V. Ferraresi. Divisione di Oncologia Medica 1

The information in this activity is intended for healthcare professionals based outside of the United States. This activity may contain information

New paradigms for treating metastatic melanoma

Immune checkpoint blockade in lung cancer

Supplementary Online Content

Targeted Therapies in Melanoma

BCCA Protocol Summary for the Treatment of BRAF V600 Mutation- Positive Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma Using dabrafenib and Trametinib

Immunotherapy in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma: Where Do We Stand? Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD St. Luke s Cancer Center Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

6/7/16. Melanoma. Updates on immune checkpoint therapies. Molecularly targeted therapies. FDA approval for talimogene laherparepvec (T- VEC)

Presenter Disclosure Information

New Systemic Therapies in Advanced Melanoma

III Sessione I risultati clinici

Evolving Treatment Strategies in the Management of Metastatic Melanoma: Novel Therapies for Improved Patient Outcomes. Disclosures

Immunotherapy Treatment Developments in Medical Oncology

Supplementary Appendix

Combination Approaches in Melanoma: A Balancing Act

Pembrolizumab for Patients With PD-L1 Positive Advanced Carcinoid or Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results From the KEYNOTE-028 Study

The Development of Encorafenib (LGX818) and Binimetinib (MEK162) in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

BRAF Inhibitors in Metastatic disease. Grant McArthur MB BS PhD Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne, Australia

Array BioPharma Jefferies 2016 Global Healthcare Conference. June 9, 2016

Approaches To Treating Advanced Melanoma

Melanoma- Fighting the Dark Side

CombiRT in Metastatic Melanoma Trial

Nilotinib AEs (adverse events) in CML population:

Supplementary Appendix

Summary... 2 MELANOMA AND OTHER SKIN TUMOURS... 3

PRODUCT MONOGRAPH. Trametinib Tablets. 0.5 mg and 2 mg. ATC Code: L01XE23 Protein Kinase Inhibitor

Melanoma Clinical Trials and Real World Experience

Immunotherapy for Metastatic Malignant Melanoma. Dr Daniel A Vorobiof Sandton Oncology Centre Johannesburg

Initial Results from an Open-label, Doseescalation Phase I Study of the Oral BRAF Inhibitor LGX818 in BRAF V600 mutant Advanced Melanoma

Adverse effects of Immunotherapy. Asha Nayak M.D

Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer

Overall Survival in COLUMBUS: A Phase 3 Trial of Encorafenib (ENCO) Plus Binimetinib (BINI) vs Vemurafenib (VEM) or ENCO in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma

Melanoma: From Chemotherapy to Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy. What every patient needs to know. James Larkin

Heme Onc Today New York Melanoma Meeting March 22-23, 2013 PD-1 antibodies

New Avenues for the development and evaluation of therapy: Complex, multi-pronged, not one size fitting all

ASCO 2017 updates in Colorectal and Gastric Cancers. May Cho, M.D.

Jefferies 2018 Healthcare Conference. June 6, 2018

Mind the Gap : Challenges in First-in- Man Evaluation of Immuno-Oncology Drugs

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Braine-l Alleud, Belgium; 12 MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

Immunotherapy of Melanoma Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD

Modern therapy in oncology Metastatic melanoma

Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors Expert Perspectives on The New Data Sunday, June 5, 2016

Eric Van Cutsem University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium

Updates in Metastatic Melanoma

New Therapeutic Approaches to Malignant Melanoma

Attached from the following page is the press release made by BMS for your information.

Management of Brain Metastases Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD

Checkpoint-Inhibitoren beim Lungenkarzinom. Dr. Helge Bischoff Thoraxklinik Heidelberg

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT Adi Diab 1, Nizar Tannir 1, Daniel Cho

PRODUCT MONOGRAPH. Trametinib Tablets. 0.5 mg and 2 mg. Protein Kinase Inhibitor (L01XE23)

DCC-2618, a novel pan-kit and PDGFR

Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Combination Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

ASCO 2014: The Future is Here. What I Will Talk About. George W. Sledge MD Stanford University School of Medicine

Tafinlar. Tafinlar (dabrafenib) Description

Innovations in Immunotherapy - Melanoma. Systemic Therapies October 27, 2018 Charles L. Bane, MD

Product: Talimogene Laherparepvec Clinical Study Report: Date: 31 October 2018 Page 1

Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer. Aurelio B. Castrellon Medical Oncology Memorial Healthcare System

IMMUNOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF CERVIX CANCER

Osimertinib Activity in Patients With Leptomeningeal Disease From Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Updated Results From the BLOOM Study

Terapia Immunomodulante e Target Therapies nel Trattamento del Melanoma Metastatico

Nivolumab in Patients With DNA Mismatch Repair Deficient/Microsatellite Instability High Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Update From CheckMate 142

Mariano Provencio Servicio de Oncología Médica Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro. Immune checkpoint inhibition in DLBCL

Idera Pharmaceuticals

New treatments in melanoma

Checkpoint regulators a new class of cancer immunotherapeutics. Dr Oliver Klein Medical Oncologist ONJCC Austin Health

Response and resistance to BRAF inhibitors in melanoma

Medical Treatment for Melanoma Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD

Checkpoint Regulators Cancer Immunotherapy takes centre stage. Dr Oliver Klein Department of Medical Oncology 02 May 2015

CheckMate 012: Safety and Efficacy of First Line Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer


Vemurafenib (Zelboraf ) BRAF V600 mutation positive Metastatic Melanoma

MELANOMA METASTASICO: NUEVAS COMBINACIONES. Dr Ana Arance MD PhD Oncología Médica Hospital Clínic Barcelona

ASCO / COLUMBUS ENCORE PRESENTATION June 4, 2018

INITIAL RESULTS OF PHASE 1 STUDY OF DCC-2618, A BROAD-SPECTRUM KIT AND PDGFR

B. G. Redman University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. J. A. Thompson University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Clinical Study Synopsis

Encouraging activity of novel pan-kit and PDGFRα inhibitor DCC-2618 in patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

Combination Therapies Based on PD-1 or PD-L1 Blockade

ONCOS-102 in melanoma Dr. Alexander Shoushtari. 4. ONCOS-102 in mesothelioma 5. Summary & closing

Clinical Activity and Safety of Anti-PD-1 (BMS , MDX-1106) in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Attached from the following page is the press release made by BMS for your information.

Update on Melanoma Treatment. Tara C Mitchell, MD

Immunotherapy in the Adjuvant Setting for Melanoma: What You Need to Know

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Trametinib (Mekinist) for Metastatic Melanoma October 22, 2013

Treatment and management of advanced melanoma: Paul B. Chapman, MD Melanoma Clinical Director, Melanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service MSKCC

Beyond BRAFi/MEKi: Combination and Sequencing Approaches for in Patients with Metastatic BRAF V600 Mutant Melanoma:

BR is an established treatment regimen for CLL in the front-line and R/R settings

DYNAMO: A PHASE 2 STUDY OF DUVELISIB IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY INDOLENT NON HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

Immunoterapia e melanoma maligno metastatico: siamo partiti da li. Vanna Chiarion Sileni Istituto Oncologico Veneto

Study No Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

Disclosures Information Brendan D. Curti, MD

Atezolizumab Non-small cell lung cancer

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

ESMO GI / BEACON CRC SAFETY LEAD-IN ENCORE PRESENTATION June 23, 2018

Attached from the following page is the press release made by BMS for your information.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Accrual Status We are currently only enrolling patients who are either:

Principles and Application of Immunotherapy for Cancer: Advanced Melanoma

Transcription:

Phase 1 Study Combining Anti-PD-L1 (MEDI4736) With BRAF (Dabrafenib) and/or MEK (Trametinib) Inhibitors in Advanced Melanoma Abstract #3003 Ribas A, Butler M, Lutzky J, Lawrence D, Robert C, Miller W, Linette G, Ascierto PA, Kuzel TM, Algazi A, Postow M, Nathan P, Curti B, Robbins PB, Li X, Blake-Haskins JA, Gordon M

Potential Improvement Through Combinations of Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy Current treatment options for BRAF V600 -mutated melanoma include: BRAF alone or BRAF/MEK inhibitors rapid clinically significant responses usually with limited durability Immunotherapy less frequent objective responses but clinically significant durability Immunotherapy Targeted Therapy Combination? Percent Alive Percent Alive + = Percent Alive 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 Years Years Years Hypothesis: Combining anti-pd-l1 with BRAF and MEK inhibitors may result in higher frequency of long-lasting responses in patients with advanced BRAF V600 -mutated melanoma

BRAF/MEK Inhibition Modulates the Immune Microenvironment CD8+ TILs 1,2 Melanoma antigen expression 1 Antitumor activity of combined BRAFi+MEKi plus anti-pd-1 3 MHC and melanoma antigen expression 3 1. Frederick DT, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(5):1225-1231. 2. Wilmott JS, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;18(5):1386-1394. 3. Hu-Lieskovan S, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(279):279ra41.

Cohort A Cohort B Cohort C Study Design and Population BRAF mutation positive BRAF wildtype BRAF wildtype 12-month treatment period MEDI3746 3 or 10 mg/kg Q2W Dabrafenib 180 mg BID Until PD* Trametinib 2 mg QD 12-month treatment period MEDI3746 3 or 10 mg/kg Q2W Trametinib 2 mg QD Until PD* 12-month treatment period MEDI3746 10 mg/kg Q2W 6-week Trametinib 2 mg QD Follow-up Follow-up Follow-up *MEDI4736 can be reintroduced upon PD for up to 12 months Key inclusion criteria Stage IIIC/IV melanoma BRAF mutation status - Cohort A confirmed BRAF V600E/K mutation positive - Cohort B and C confirmed BRAF V600E/K mutation negative ECOG PS 0-1 Adequate organ and marrow function Prior immunotherapy permitted - anti-ctla-4 - anti-pd-l1/anti-pd-l1 Measurable disease required Key exclusion criteria Active or prior autoimmune disease Prior BRAF or MEK inhibitor therapy Prior severe or persistent irae BID, twice daily; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status; irae, immune-related adverse event; PD, progressive disease; Q2W, every 2 weeks; QD, once daily; SD, stable disease

Patient Baseline Demographics Characteristic D + T + M T + M T M (sequential) Cohort A (n=26) Cohort B (n=20) Cohort C (n=19) Mean age, years (range) 47.2 (23-71) 62.2 (31-85) 58.7 (34-84) Sex Male (%) 14 (54) 13 (65) 10 (53) ECOG status 0 (%) 19 (73) 13 (65) - 1 (%) 5 (19) 7 (35) - NA (%) 2 (8) 0 (0) 19 (100) a Mutational status BRAF WT (%) 0 (0) 20 (100) 19 (100) BRAF V600E (%) 19 (73) 0 (0) 0 (0) BRAF V600E/K (%) 7 (27) 0 (0) 0 (0) NRAS (%) 0 (0) 3 (15) 6 (32) Stage at study entry Stage III (%) 5 (19) 2 (10) 4 (21) Stage IV (%) 21 (81) 18 (90) 15 (79) Median no. prior systemic therapy regimens (range) 0 (0-2) 2 (0-4) 1 (0-4) Patients who received prior systemic therapy, n (%) 10 (38) 12 (60) 14 (74) Patients who received prior immunotherapy in adjuvant or metastatic setting, n Anti-CTLA-4 (%) 6 (23) 11 (55) 8 (42) Anti-PD-1 (%) 0 (0) 6 (30) 5 (26) Cytokine-based therapy (%) 7 (27) 7 (35) 6 (32) Median follow-up duration: Cohort A 7.1 months Cohort B 6.8 months Cohort C 3.7 months Median exposure duration: Cohort A 6.4 months Cohort B 4.1 months Cohort C 2.7 months a Per protocol, ECOG status for Cohort C was not collected prior to first dose of study drug, but all patients were required to be ECOG 0 or 1 per eligibility criteria As-treated population. Data cut-off: May 7, 2015

Summary of Drug-Related Adverse Events Drug-Related Adverse Event (AE), n (%) a D + T + M T + M T M (sequential) Cohort A (n = 26) Cohort B (n = 20) Cohort C ( n = 19) Any AE 26 (100) 20 (100) 18 (95) Grade 3 AE 12 (46) 9 (45) 9 (47) Serious AE 8 (31) 4 (20) 4 (21) AE leading to discontinuation of any drug b 3 (12) 3 (15) 4 (21) AE leading to death 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) AE related to MEDI4736 14 (54) 7 (35) 8 (42) AE related to dabrafenic and/or trametinib 22 (85) 19 (95) 15 (79) Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in two patients Reversible grade 3 thrombocytopenia in Cohort A1 (MEDI4736 3 mg/kg) Reversible grade 3 choroidal effusion in Cohort B Full doses of all agents were tolerable and chosen for expansion MEDI4736 10 mg/kg Q2W + dabrafenib 150 mg BID +/or trametinib 2 mg QD a Patients counted once per category regardless of number of events. b In Cohort A (n=3): platelet count decreased (n=1), pyrexia (n=1), and pyrexia, myalgia, and arthralgia in 1 patient. In Cohort B (n=3): skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (n=1), retinal vein occlusion (n=1), and blurred vision and choroidal effusion with ciliary body shutdown in 1 patients. In Cohort C (n=4): elevated LFTs (n=1), creatinine kinase elevation (n=1), skin urticaria (n=1) and lipase increased (n=1). Data cut-off: May 7, 2015

Drug-Related AEs Occurring in 25% of Patients AE Preferred Term, n (%) Cohort A (n=26) Cohort B (n=20) Cohort C (n=19) D + T + M T + M T M (Sequential) All Grades Grade 3 All Grades Grade 3 All Grades Grade 3 Diarrhea 10 (39) 1 (4) 10 (50) 0 (0) 6 (32) 1 (5) Fatigue 15 (58) 0 (0) 6 (30) 1 (5) 5 (26) 0 (0) Pyrexia 20 (77) 1 (4) 2 (10) 0 (0) 2 (11) 1 (5) Rash 8 (31) 1 (4) 7 (35) 0 (0) 9 (47) 2 (11) Chills 14 (54) 0 (0) 1 (5) 0 (0) 2 (11) 0 (0) Vomiting 11 (42) 1 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (32) 0 (0) Nausea 9 (35) 0 (0) 1 (5) 0 (0) 4 (21) 0 (0) Edema peripheral 5 (19) 0 (0) 3 (15) 0 (0) 6 (32) 0 (0) Dry mouth a 8 (31) 0 (0) 1 (5) 0 (0) 3 (16) 0 (0) Folliculitis a 2 (8) 0 (0) 5 (25) 1 (5) 5 (26) 0 (0) Arthralgia a 11 (42) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Hyperhidrosis a 8 (31) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) a AEs occurring in 25% of patients in 1 cohorts, but not across 25% of the total population As-treated population. Data cut-off: May 7, 2015

Selected Drug-Related AEs of Interest AE Peferred Term, n (%) Cohort A (n = 26) Cohort B (n =20) Cohort C (n = 19) D + T + M T + M T M (sequential) All Grades Grade 3 All Grades Grade 3 All Grades Grade 3 Pneumonitis 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (5) 0 (0) Colitis 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Hypothyroidism 1 (4) 0 (0) 2 (10) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Hyperthyroidism 1 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (5) 0 (0) Hepatic events AST increased 5 (19) 2 (8) 1 (5) 0 (0) 2 (11) 0 (0) ALT increased 5 (19) 1 (4) 1 (5) 0 (0) 1 (5) 0 (0) Blood bilirubin increased 1 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Liver function test abnormal 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (5) 1 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) Tubulointerstitial nephritis 1 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Cardiac events Ejection fraction decreased 1 (4) 1 (4) 1 (5) 1 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) Hypertension 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (10) 2 (10) 1 (5) 1 (5) Ocular toxicities Retinal vein occlusion 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Detachment of retinal pigment epithelium 1 (4) 0 (0) 1 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Vision blurred 2 (8) 0 (0) 2 (10) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Hyperkeratosis 1 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) As-treated population. Data cut-off: May 7, 2015

Immune Activation Post-Treatment Evidence of immune activation is observed post-treatment in all cohorts Frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD8 T cells increases post-treatment Levels of interferon gamma and other Th1- associated factors in plasma are increased post-treatment More dramatic and consistent changes are observed in Cohort A versus Cohorts B and C

Clinical Activity to Date Response evaluable population includes all patients dosed 16 weeks prior to the cut-off date with measurable disease at baseline and 1 f/u scan (or discontinuation due to death or PD prior to 1 st scan) Cohort A (n = 26) Cohort B (n = 19) Cohort C* (n = 15) Clinical activity D + T + M T + M T M (sequential) ORR, n (%) 18 (69) 4 (21) 2 a (13) DCR (CR + PR + SD), n (%) 26 (100) 15 (79) 12 (80) SD 12 weeks, n (%) b 4 (15) 10 (53) 6 (40) Ongoing responders, n/n (%) 16/18 (89%) 4/4 (100%) 1/2 (50%) Range of duration of ongoing response, weeks c 7.7+ to 50.6+ 7.9+ to 24.7+ 7.0+ Median duration of response has not yet been reached for cohorts A and B *Shorter follow up in cohort C, with 5 additional patients ongoing with best response of unconfirmed PR D, dabrafenib; DCR, disease control rate; M, MEDI4736; ORR, overall response rate; T, trametinib a Responses based on the principles of immune-related RECIST; the two patients in Cohort C had unconventional confirmed PRs; b Includes subjects with unconfirmed PR or SD as the best overall response. c Duration of response is calculated for subjects with confirmed responses Data cut-off: May 8, 2015

Tumor Size Change and Time to Response: Cohort A Cohort A (D+T+M) Tumor size change from baseline Cohort A (D+T+M) Time to response and duration of response Figure includes subjects with confirmed response in response evaluation population. D/C treatment=discontinuation of the regimen As-treated population. Data cut-off: May 8, 2015

Tumor Size Change and Time to Response: Cohort B and C Cohort B (T+M) Cohort C (T M) As-treated population. Data cut-off: May 8, 2015

Conclusions Combination of a checkpoint inhibitor with BRAF + MEK combination therapy was feasible and tolerable No maximum tolerated dose identified, and full doses of all agents were selected for dose expansion Toxicities observed were consistent with the known safety profiles of the combination components No exacerbation of immune-related AEs was apparent Markers of immune activation were observed post-treatment in all cohorts Early clinical activity was observed in all cohorts with the majority of patients having ongoing responses Results too preliminary to detect differences in concurrent vs sequenced dosing of trametinib and MEDI4736 Long follow-up is necessary Patients with a BRAF mutation treated with a combination of BRAF and MEK inhibition exhibited the greatest immune activation as well as the greatest clinical activity