Prostate Cancer Who needs active surveillance?

Similar documents
PSA is rising: What to do? After curative intended radiotherapy: More local options?

Pre-test. Prostate Cancer The Good News: Prostate Cancer Screening 2012: Putting the PSA Controversy to Rest

Controversies in Prostate Cancer Screening

To be covered. Screening, early diagnosis, and treatment including Active Surveillance for prostate cancer: where is Europe heading for?

Contemporary Approaches to Screening for Prostate Cancer

PROSTATE CANCER SURVEILLANCE

Risk Migration ( ct2c=high)

Where are we with PSA screening?

ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER

Conceptual basis for active surveillance

ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE OR WATCHFUL WAITING

Sommerakademie Munich, June

J Clin Oncol 28: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Prostate Cancer. Axiom. Overdetection Is A Small Issue. Reducing Morbidity and Mortality

Prostate Cancer Incidence

Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand PSA Testing Policy 2009

Health Screening Update: Prostate Cancer Zamip Patel, MD FSACOFP Convention August 1 st, 2015

Prostate Biopsy. Prostate Biopsy. We canʼt go backwards: Screening has helped!

Detection & Risk Stratification for Early Stage Prostate Cancer

Prostate Cancer Screening: Risks and Benefits across the Ages

Men at risk of prostate cancer. Recommendation D C. Reevaluating PSA Testing in the PLCO Trial. already in 2012

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 63 (2013)

Published Ahead of Print on April 4, 2011 as /JCO J Clin Oncol by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Sorveglianza Attiva update

Screening and Risk Stratification of Men for Prostate Cancer Metastasis and Mortality

PROSTATE CANCER Amit Gupta MD MPH

Untreated Gleason Grade Progression on Serial Biopsies during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Clinical Course and Pathological Outcomes

Prostate Cancer: from Beginning to End

Prostate Cancer: 2010 Guidelines Update

Prostate Cancer Innovations in Surgical Strategies Update 2007!

Rationale for Multimodality Therapy for High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer

AUA Update Series. Lesson 33 Volume Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Patient Selection and Management

Objectives. Prostate Cancer Screening and Surgical Management

Prostate Cancer Screening: Con. Laurence Klotz Professor of Surgery, Sunnybrook HSC University of Toronto

Yiannis Philippou 1, Hary Raja 2 and Vincent J. Gnanapragasam 2*

european urology 51 (2007)

Predicting the Probability of Deferred Radical Treatment for Localised Prostate Cancer Managed by Active Surveillance

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION

Radical Prostatectomy: Management of the Primary From Localized to Oligometasta:c Disease

PSA Screening and Prostate Cancer. Rishi Modh, MD

PSA testing in New Zealand general practice

Prostate Cancer Screening. Eric Shreve, MD Bend Urology Associates

Local Recommendations for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer

Presentation with lymphadenopathy

Otis W. Brawley, MD, MACP, FASCO, FACE

Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature

PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING: AN UPDATE

Radical Prostatectomy:

Debate: Whole pelvic RT for high risk prostate cancer??

Oli-P and beyond Endpoints for PSMA based local ablative Radiotherapy. Dr. med. Fabian Lohaus Klinik und Poliklinik für Radioonkologie der TU Dresden

MR-US Fusion Guided Biopsy: Is it fulfilling expectations?

J Clin Oncol 29: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Financial Disclosures. Prostate Cancer Screening and Surgical Management

How to deal with patients who fail intracavitary treatment

Expanded criteria for active surveillance in prostate cancer: a review of the current data

Adam Raben M.D. Helen F Graham Cancer Center

Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large Active Surveillance Cohort of Patients With Prostate Cancer

Presentation with lymphadenopathy

Active surveillance: Shrinking the grey zone. Sommerakademi e Munich, June rd FOIUS Tel Aviv, July 2016

Elevated PSA. Dr.Nesaretnam Barr Kumarakulasinghe Associate Consultant Medical Oncology National University Cancer Institute, Singapore 9 th July 2017

Best Papers. F. Fusco

Since the beginning of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era in the. Characteristics of Insignificant Clinical T1c Prostate Tumors

Approximately 680,000 men are diagnosed with prostate

#1 cancer. #2 killer. Boulder has higher rate of prostate cancer compared to other areas surrounding Rocky Flats

Relationship between initial PSA density with future PSA kinetics and repeat biopsies in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 62 (2012)

Helping you make better-informed decisions 1-5

SHARED DECISION MAKING FOR PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING

Outcomes in Localized Prostate Cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden Follow-up Study

AllinaHealthSystems 1

BPH with persistently elevated PSA 아주대학교김선일

Managing Prostate Cancer in General Practice

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.

Outcomes With "Watchful Waiting" in Prostate Cancer in US Now So Good, Active Treatment May Not Be Better

The Evolving Role of PSA for Prostate Cancer. The Evolving Role of PSA for Prostate Cancer: 10/30/2017

Can men on AS be treated with testosterone?

State-of-the-art: vision on the future. Urology

Understanding the risk of recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer. Aditya Bagrodia, MD

Active surveillance for low-risk Prostate Cancer Compared with Immediate Treatment: A Canadian cost evaluation

Prostate Cancer. Dr. Andres Wiernik 2017

Active Surveillance with High Resolution Color-Doppler Transrectal Ultrasound Monitoring: Is it fool-proof?

Original Article The implications of prostate-specific antigen density to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in men 50 years

Follow-up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate Cancer

PCA MORTALITY VS TREATMENTS

Fellow GU Lecture Series, Prostate Cancer. Asit Paul, MD, PhD 02/20/2018

Active Surveillance (AS) is an expectant management. Health Services Research

High Intensity Focused Ultrasounds for the treatment of Prostate Cancers Clinical update November D. Maruzzi - L. Ruggera

Understanding the Performance of Active Surveillance Selection Criteria in Diverse Urology Practices

High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment Should Start with RT

Prostate Cancer Screening. Dickon Hayne University of Western Australia

european urology 55 (2009)

PSA and the Future. Axel Heidenreich, Department of Urology

Cancer Screening 2009: New Tests, New Choices

Reducing overtreatment of prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy in Eastern Ontario: a population-based cohort study

The Role of Biopsy Core Number in Selecting Prostate Cancer Patients for Active Surveillance

2015 myresearch Science Internship Program: Applied Medicine. Civic Education Office of Government and Community Relations

Impact of PSA Screening on Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the US

Response to United States Preventative Services Task Force draft PSA Screening recommendation: Donald B. Fuller, M.D. Genesis Healthcare Partners

Screening and Diagnosis Prostate Cancer

Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for European Urology Manuscript Draft

Transcription:

Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie Direktor: Prof. Dr. H. Riedmiller Prostate Cancer Who needs active surveillance? Klinische und molekulare Charakterisierung des Hoch-Risiko-Prostatakarzinoms. Martin Spahn

Epidemiologie 500.000 345.000 156.000 75.000 68.000? Bray et al. 2001 1995 1995 2006 2006 2050 2050 Ferlay et al. 2007 Eurostat 2006

Cancer Incidence Rates* for Men, US, 1975-2001 Rate Per 100,000 Prostate Colon & rectum Lung & bronchus Urinary bladder Non-Hodgkin lymphoma *Age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population. Source: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 1975-2001, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 2004.

N Engl J Med 2009;360:1320-8. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1310-9. 20% No difference Reduction Of mortality PSA cut-off 4.0 ng/ml Sextant biopsies Pre-Screened short Follow up High contamination rate Only 40% biopsies

European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Intention-to-screen analysis: To avoid one PCa death 1410 (95% CI, 1142-1721) men need to be screened 48 individuals need to be treated radically Overdetection and Overtreatment Schroeder et al. NEJM 2009

The diagnosis of low risk PCa is increasing Cooperberg et al, J Urol 2003

Rationale for active surveillance 1. Some men with PCa benefit from radical treatment 2. Treatment has adverse effects, and should be given only to those who stand to benefit 3. Most men with screen-detected PCa probably do not need treatment

Heidenreich et al., Eur Urol 2011 (59) 61-71

Inclusion criteria in Active Surveillance Series Author Publication year Inclusion criteria Treatment criteria Klotz 2006 PSA <15, Gleason <7, <T2b Soloway 2007 Age <80 years, PSA < 15, Gleason <6, < T2, <50% of two biopsy cores Carter 2007 PSA density <0.15ng/ml/cm 3, Gleason <6, <2 positive cores, <50% of any core involved Dall era 2008 PSA < 10, Gleason <6, <33% biopsy, T1/T2a Van As 2008 PSA < 15, Gleason <7, <50% positive biopsy cores (PBC), T1/T2a PSADT < 2 years, clinical progression, biopsy progression PSA progression, re-biopsy <7, stage progression, patient preference Gleason 4 or 5, >2 cores with cancer, >50% cancer in any core on re-biopy Increase in re-biopsy Gleason sum, PSA velocity >0.75ng/mL per year PSA velocity > 1ng/ml/yr, primary Gleason grade >/= 4, or PBC >50% on repeat biopsy Roemeling 2007 Screen detected As per clinician / patient decision

Results of Active Surveillance Author n Median age (years) Follow-up (Months) % remaining on surveillance Cancer specific mortality (%) Klotz 299 Not given 64 60 0.7 Soloway 99 66 46 92 0 Carter 407 66 34 59 0 Dall era 321 63 43 63 0 Van As 326 67 22 73 0 Roemeling 278 70 41 71 0

Active Surveillance with delayed treatment - Cancer specific survival - Klotz et al., J. Urol., 172:S48-S51, 2004

Active Surveillance ERSPC P = 0.689 Delayed RP Immediate RP Van den Bergh et al., Cancer 2010;116:1281 90

Natural course of Pca Albertsen tables N=767 Diagnosed 1971-1976 Clinical stage T2 Palliative treatment Dark grey = PCa Light grey = nonpca White = survival Albertsen et al., JAMA,1995 (8):626-631

Distribution Gleason Score 50% 40% Orginal Actual Percentag ge of Men 30% 20% 10% 0% 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gleason Score N = 1858 men Albertsen et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1248-1253, 2005

Natural course of Pca N=14.516 Diagnosed 1992-2002 Clinical stage T2 Conservative treatment Dark grey = PCa Light grey = nonpca White = survival Lu-Yao et al., JAMA,2009 (11):1202-1209

Prostate cancer Median age at diagnosis: 68 yrs. 1 out of 4 PCa patients >75 yrs. 71% of all PCa deaths Ries L et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2005.

Life Expectancy In 2002 Age Expected Lifetime (years) 60 19.7 65 15.9 70 12.6 75 9.6 Statistisches Bundesamt 2004

Prevalence of comorbidity across age groups Piccirillo et al. Critical Reviews Oncology-Hematology 2008;67(2):124-132

Estimates of Life Expectancy Walter et al. JAMA 2001; 285:2750-2756

Competing risk of mortality by age at diagnosis, cancer stage, grade, and comorbidity: cancer stage T2. Albertsen et al. JCO 2011;29:1335-1341

Natural history of prostate cancer Prostate cancer is inherently biologically heterogenous Patients have been staged differently in various studies Stage N 15 year PFS 15 year DSS % 95% CI % 95% CI T1-T2 300 48 37.3-58.7 80.9 73.6-88.2 T3-T4 183 46.6 32.7-60.5 56.5 44.6-68.4 M+ 159 6.2 0.8-10.6 5.7-0.1-11.5 Johansson et al., JAMA,1997;227:467-471

Who needs active surveillance? PSA <15, Gleason <7, <T2b Age <80 years, PSA < 15, Gleason <6, < T2, <50% of two biopsy cores PSA density <0.15ng/ml/cm3, Gleason <6, <2 positive cores, <50% of any core involved PSA < 10, Gleason <6, <33% biopsy, T1/T2a PSA < 15, Gleason <7, <50% positive biopsy cores (PBC), T1/T2a Screen detected

Who needs active surveillance? - Future aspects - Men with low risk PCa criteria Men with intermediate risk PCa and Charlson score >1 Men >75 yrs. of age Men ineligible for definitive local radical treatment