Survey Methodology Barbara Kowalczyk SGH Warsw School of Economics

Similar documents
A Bayesian Measurement Model of Political Support for Endorsement Experiments, with Application to the Militant Groups in Pakistan

Oklahoma Turning Point Council (OTPC)

Appendix Reassessing Public Support for a Female President. 1. Sampling Methodology

Advertising, Promotion, Countermarketing, and Tobacco Use. Frank J. Chaloupka University of Illinois at Chicago

ESS/BUDAPEST CROSS NATIONAL PROJECT: Interviewer Note Template for ESS QUESTIONS ONLY

Asking Sensitive Questions in Surveys

The Randomized Response Technique (RRT) application to the National Survey on Substance Use in General Population in Georgia 2015

Youth Smoking. An assessment of trends in youth smoking through Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services. Percent.

Majority approve of legalized, regulated, taxed cannabis

The Meaning of the November Ballot Initiative to Legalize Recreational Marijuana

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Community Survey. Preview Copy. Our Community Assessing Social Capital

Bingo - Teacher Answer Key

Tobacco Health Cost in Egypt

Alcohol taxes and restrictions could curb problem drinking, but are hard to sell

A.A. I am responsible. P-36

HIV/AIDS KNOWLEDGE SERIES NO. 46 APRIL 1996

Impact Evaluation Methods: Why Randomize? Meghan Mahoney Policy Manager, J-PAL Global

We admitted that we were powerless over alcohol that our lives had become unmanageable.

What is a clinical psychologist?

Chapter 8 Estimating with Confidence

PREVENTION FOR A HEALTHIER AMERICA: Investments in Disease Prevention Yield Significant Savings, Stronger Communities

We admitted that we were powerless over alcohol that our lives had become unmanageable. Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) (2001, p. 59)

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

About this consent form

Political incentives for more effective prevention including health care settings

Homework #2 is due next Friday at 5pm.

Report for Government of Saskatchewan Cannabis Survey

OBJECTIVES: LESSON 11. Smoke Signals. Page 1. Overview: Suggested Time: Resources/Materials: Preparation: Procedure:

Cigarettes. Ada Ellisman, Bryan Gibson, & Evie White

Effective Technology and Its Economic Benefits: The Case of Colonoscopy

NATIONAL SURVEY ON THE MISTREATMENT OF OLDER ADULTS IN CANADA

The Economics of Obesity

Proposal 18-1: Marijuana Legalization

Communication Research Practice Questions

Cannabis Legalization in Alberta

Co-Variation in Sexual and Non-Sexual Risk Behaviors Over Time Among U.S. High School Students:

What Colorado Employers Need To Know About Marijuana and Workers Compensation

Celebrity boosts breast cancer action

THE PUBLIC AND GENETIC EDITING, TESTING, AND THERAPY

Survey of Smoking, Drinking and Drug Use (SDD) among young people in England, Andrew Bryant

National health-care expenditures are projected to rise to $5.2 trillion by 2023

A Probability Puzzler. Statistics, Data and Statistical Thinking. A Probability Puzzler. A Probability Puzzler. Statistics.

A Case- Control comparison of mental burden across and within different types of cancers in Nepal

Learning English podcasts from the Hellenic American Union. Level: Advanced Lesson: 36 Title: Cigarette Lawsuit

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

Influencing Factors of Unsafe Sexual Practices among Dodoma University Students, Tanzania

Judicial & Ethics Policy

The Economics of Smoking

Thinking About the Causes of Diabetes: Cultural Models, Gender and Individual Adjustment to Type 2 Diabetes in a Mexican Community

20. Experiments. November 7,

UCLA PTSD REACTION INDEX FOR CHLDREN AND ADOLESCENTS DSM-5 Version Page 1 of 9 TRAUMA HISTORY PROFILE

One fifth use marijuana now

SURVEY RESEARCH. MSc Economic Policy (March 2015) Dr Mark Ward, Department of Sociology

Citizens Jury Questionnaire Results

This presentation focuses on recent changes in vaccine storage and handling requirements for the State Childhood Vaccine Program.

Pregnancy Crisis Careline Inc DBA Pregnancy Careline Center

Peer Support Meeting COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES

GATS Highlights. GATS Objectives. GATS Methodology

Write your identification number on each paper and cover sheet (the number stated in the upper right hand corner on your exam cover).

Indirect Questioning in Sample Surveys

INFERENCE W H Y. l e a r n a b o u t i n f e r e n c. INFERENCE Name: Date:

REPORT ON GLOBAL YOUTH TOBACCO SURVEY SWAZILAND

AAPT Summer 2004, Sacramento, CA

How Confident Are Yo u?

Cannabis Culture Poll. November 2018

Arab American Voters 2014

Estimating Prevalence of Sexual Abuse by an Acquaintance with an Optional Unrelated Question RRT Model

YOU GAVE ME WHAT?! A simulation of the spread of a sexually transmitted disease

COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF NOVA SCOTIA SUMMARY OF DECISION OF INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE D. Dr. Deanna Swinamer

OPINIONS CONCERNING DRUG LAW REFORM IN HAWAII

Deepening Democracy: Changing the World by Building a Youth Base for Replacing

ELEVEN REASONS WHY S IS BAD PUBLIC POLICY. Clinton Admin. FY00 budget request for FDA tobacco regulation was $34 million.

Respond in the space provided in your Answer Document. (2 points)

Post-Conference Auditing and Investigating Fraud Seminar. Investigating Track Admission-Seeking Interviews

Medical & Recreational Marijuana in Washington State North Dakota Association of Counties Conference October 9, 2017

Qualitative Research Methods

In their Eyes: An Average Child s View of their World

TIME INTERVIEW BEGAN: Questionnaire for Unmarried Latino Women

Module A. Middle School Questionnaire

First Problem Set: Answers, Discussion and Background

Marijuana Legalization 2016: Understanding the policy landscape and design considerations

PHONE SCRIPTS, QUESTIONNAIRES AND WAIVERS OF DOCUMENTATION. Bertha delanda, CIP IRB Training Specialist January 2012

Housing Needs Assessment Survey Tool

Publishing as Prentice Hall

What is the Scientific Method?

How Emotionally Intelligent are You? by Doris Jeanette, Psy.D.

Great Expectations: Changing Mode of Survey Data Collection in Military Populations

TFI WHO 20 Avenue Appia 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. Gentlemen:

ELECTION NIGHT 2018 HOT SHEET

A Sexual Health Study with Africans in Frankfurt am Main

Healthy People, Healthy Communities

Tennessee Tobacco Settlement Health Councils Planning Meeting. Tennessee Public Health Association September 12, 2103

Economic dependence on tobacco and changes in attitudes toward tobacco control among North Carolina tobacco growers

ASSIGNMENT 2. Question 4.1 In each of the following situations, describe a sample space S for the random phenomenon.

observational studies Descriptive studies

SMS USA PHASE ONE SMS USA BULLETIN BOARD FOCUS GROUP: MODERATOR S GUIDE

WHO FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON TOBACCO CONTROL Pre-hearing Submission Nancy J. Kaufman

Transcription:

Survey Methodology Barbara Kowalczyk SGH Warsw School of Economics Uwaga: materiały objęte są prawami autorskimi i udostępnione są studentom SGH z przedmiotu Teoria i projektowanie badań reprezentacyjnych tylko na potrzeby wykładu bez prawa do dalszego rozpowszechniania

Sensitive questions Private Stigmatizing Socially unaccepted Illegal e.g. drug uses, beating children, politically incorrect views, voting (only in some countries), atypical sexual behaviors, abortion, bribery of officials (corruption), tax frauds, illegal work (black market)

Sensitive questions Direct methods of questioning ensuring anonymity creating an atmosphere of trust redirecting focus: e.g. not Have you ever hit your wife? but rather How many times have you hit your wife? using authority: e.g. Many people from the school authorities used to smoke marihuana in their youth. Have you ever tried marihuana? Indirect methods of questioning

Sensitive questions Indirect methods of questioning It is not possible to prove to the respondent that he or she possesses the sensitive attribute Researcher does not know if particular respondent possesses the sensitive attribute or not It is still possible to inference about population proportion of people who have the sensitive attribute Full privacy is assure usually at the expense of the efficiency of the estimation (larger samples sizes are needed)

Randomized response technique RRT Non-related question design Please take out any banknote you have. If the last number of the serial number on your banknote (do not show it to me) is 0,1,2,3,4 or 5 please answer the question: Have you ever bribed an official? If the last number of the serial number on your banknote (do not show it to me) is 6, 7, 8 or 9 please answer the question: Where you born in an even month of the year?

Non-related question design Greenberg at al. (1969) n sample size q probability of answering the sensitive question (1-q) probability of answering the non-related question r probability of answering YES to the non-related question p - unknown probability of answering YES to the sensitive question

Non-related question desisgn n nq n(1-q) YES NO YES NO nqp nq(1-p) n(1-q)r n(1-q)(1-r) All YESes nqp+n(1-q)r p All YESes n(1 q)r nq

Item Count Technique Survey respondents are randomly assigned to either the control or treatment group, n = n C + n T Respondents in the control group are given a list of J neutral questions (or statements) with binary outcomes Respondents in the treatment group are given a list of J+1 questions, J the same neutral questions as in the control group plus 1 sensitive Respondents are asked to report only the total of their Yes (or True) answers. In the control group it can be a number from 0 to J, in the treatment group it can be a number from 0 to J+1.

Item Count Technique (Conrol group) Now I m going to read you three things that sometimes make people angry or upset. After I read all three, just tell me HOW MANY of them upset you. (I don t want to know which ones, just how many) the federal government increasing the tax on gasoline; professional athletes getting million-dollar-plus salaries; large corporations polluting the environment. How many, if any, of these things upset you? Source: Imai K., (2011), Multivariate regression analysis for the item count technique, Journal of American Statistical Associasion, 206, p. 407-416.

Item Count Technique (Treatment group) Now I m going to read you three things that sometimes make people angry or upset. After I read all three, just tell me HOW MANY of them upset you. (I don t want to know which ones, just how many) the federal government increasing the tax on gasoline; professional athletes getting million-dollar-plus salaries; large corporations polluting the environment; a black family moving next door to you. How many, if any, of these things upset you? Source: Imai K., (2011), Multivariate regression analysis for the item count technique, Journal of American Statistical Associasion, 206, p. 407-416.

Item Count Technique Difference in means (method of moments) estimator of the unknown population proportion of people declaring a black family moving next door is upsetting them is: p Ƹ = തY T തY C തY T - sample mean in the control group തY C - sample mean in the control group

Randomized response technique RRT Mirrored question design Please take out any banknote you have. If the last number of the serial number on your banknote (do not show it to me) is 0,1,2,3,4 or 5 please answer the question: Is it true that you have bribed an official? If the last number of the serial number on your banknote (do not show it to me) is 6, 7, 8 or 9 please answer the question: Is it true that you have never bribed an official?

Randomized response technique RRT 2000 1200 800 YES NO YES NO 1200p 1200(1-p) 800(1-p) 800p All YESes 1200p+800(1-p) p All YESes 800 400

Randomized response technique RRT Mirror question design Warner (1965) q known probability of choosing the positive question (in previous example 0.6) 1-q known probability of choosing the negative question (in previous example 0.4) p unknown population proportion of people having the sensitive attribute (parameter under study) Maximum likelihood ML estimator of p: p Ƹ = all YESes n(1 q) (2q 1)n

Forced question design Fox and Tracy (1986) With probability p, respondents are asked (forced) to write NO, with probability q, respondents are asked (forced) to write YES, with probability 1 p q they are asked to answer the sensitive question.