Insight from the CACTUS trial Coronary Bifurcation Application of the Crush

Similar documents
FFR-guided Jailed Side Branch Intervention

EBC London 2013 Provisional SB stenting strategy with kissing balloon with Absorb

ANGIOPLASY SUMMIT 2007 TCT ASIA PACIFIC. Seoul, Korea: April Session: Left mains & bifurcation intervention

Unprotected LM intervention

LM stenting - Cypher

Stent Thrombosis in Bifurcation Stenting

A Polymer-Free Dual Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trial Versus Polymer-Based DES.

Interventional Cardiology

Drug Eluting Stents: Bifurcation and Left Main Approach

PCI for Long Coronary Lesion

Are Asian Patients Different? - Updates Of Biomatrix Experience In Regional Settings: BEACON II (3 Yr F up) &

Unprotected Left Main Stenting: Patient Selection and Recent Experience. Alaide Chieffo. S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Percutaneous Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Disease

Final Clinical and Angiographic Results From a Nationwide Registry of FIREBIRD Sirolimus- Eluting Stent: Firebird In China (FIC) Registry (PI R. Gao)

Non-LM bifurcation studies of importance in 2011

A Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon for Bifurcation Lesions : Early Clinical Observations

Resolute in Bifurcation Lesions: Data from the RESOLUTE Clinical Program

Contemporary therapy of bifurcation lesions

Nobori Clinical Studies Up-dates. Gian Battista DANZI, M.D. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Italy

Medtronic Symposium The Complex Bifurcation Patient: new insights into stent selection

Protection of side branch is essential in treating bifurcation lesions: overview

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

Welcome to the 8 th European Bifurcation Club October Barcelona

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

BIOFREEDOM: Polymer free Biolimus A9 eluting

eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials

Count Down to COMBAT

Bifurcation Stenting: IVUS and OCT Information

Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I

ANGIOPLASY SUMMIT 2007 TCT ASIA PACIFIC. Seoul, Korea: April The problem is exaggerated: Data from Real World Registries

September Peter Barlis. Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK

The PARTICIPATE trial Prove ART (Abluminal Reservoir Technology) clinical benefit in all comers PATiEnts

Drug eluting balloons in CAD

Bifurcation stenting with BVS

Left Main and Bifurcation Summit I. Lessons from European LM Studies

ΣΥΜΠΛΟΚΕΣ ΑΓΓΕΙΟΠΛΑΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΑΓΓΕΙΟΠΛΑΣΤΙΚΗ ΔΙΧΑΣΜΩΝ

Post PCI functional testing and imaging: case based lessons from FFR React

The Tryton Side Branch System in Distal Left Main PCI

Run-Lin Gao, MD, FACC. On Behalf of I-LOVE-IT Trial Investigators

C. W. Hamm, B. Cremers, H. Moellmann, S. Möbius-Winkler, U. Zeymer, M. Vrolix, S. Schneider, U. Dietz, M. Böhm, B. Scheller

The Clinical Evaluation of the Medtronic AVE Driver Coronary Stent System

Update from the Tryton IDE study

PCI for Left Anterior Descending Artery Ostial Stenosis

Lesions at coronary bifurcations represent a challenging

TNT Session. The latest clinical evidence in diabetics for the Amphilimus TM eluting polymer-free DES. Rafael Romaguera, MD

Technical considerations in the Treatment of Left Main Lesions Ioannis Iakovou, MD, PhD

STENTYS for Le, Main Sten2ng. Carlo Briguori, MD, PhD Clinica Mediterranea Naples, Italy

Provisional T- sten/ng Future Outlook: Ra/onale of Plaque Incision + DCB

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

Mid-term results from real-world REPARA registry. Felipe Hernandez, on behalf of the REPARA investigators

6 th European Bifurcation Club October BUDAPEST. Kissing in simple strategy? Why and how I kiss. Y. Louvard, ICPS, Massy France

Management of Non-protected Left-Main Bifurcation without Drug Eluting Stent. Masahiko Ochiai MD, FACC, FESC, FSCAI

DEB experience in Gachon Universtiy Gil Hospital (in ISR) Soon Yong Suh MD., PhD. Heart Center Gachon University Gil Hospital Seoul, Korea.

Le# main treatment with Stentys stent. Carlo Briguori, MD, PhD Clinica Mediterranea Naples, Italy

PCI for In-Stent Restenosis. CardioVascular Research Foundation

I have nothing to disclose.

Dr. Robert J. van Geuns. Thoraxcenter ErasmusMC Rotterdam On behalf of Dr. Jean Fajadet and Co-investigators

2010 Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Scientific Session Korea Japan Joint Symposium. Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions:

Biolimus-Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Durable Polymer: A Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial

PCI for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis. Jean Fajadet Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France

Left Main PCI. Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR. Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD

FFR vs icecg in Coronary Bifurcations FIESTA ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT

Unprotected left main coronary stenting with a second generation drug-eluting stent. One-year clinical follow-up of the LeMaX pilot study.

Prevention of Coronary Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis

SKG Congress, 2015 EVOLVE II. Stephan Windecker

DISRUPT CAD. Todd J. Brinton, MD Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine Adjunct Professor of Bioengineering Stanford University

TCTAP Upendra Kaul MD,DM,FACC,FSCAI,FAMS,FCSI

COMBAT- Revised Protocol

The Nordic Bifurcation Stent Technique Study. A Randomized trial of CRUSH vs CULOTTE Stenting

Bernard Chevalier Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France. Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Netherlands

Complex PCI of an LAD/Diagonal bifurcation lesion (Medina 1,1,1) utilizing the DK Crush technique ".

Side Branch Occlusion

In-Stent Restenosis. Can we kill it?

Inspiron Stent. Clinical Research Program. Pedro A. Lemos MD PhD. Heart Institute InCor University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil

Antonio Colombo. Centro Cuore Columbus and S. Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Miracor Symposium. Speaker: 15. Parigi: May 16-19, 2017

The Vascular Concepts - PRONOVA Durable Polymer Sirolimus Eluting Stent A Review of Indian Registry Results

Why I try to avoid side branch dilatation

DES In-stent Restenosis

Intervention: How and to which extent is technology helping us?

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

FFR vs. icecg in Coronary Bifurcations (FIESTA) - preliminary results. Dobrin Vassilev MD, PhD National Heart Hospital Sofia, Bulgaria

PCI for Bifurcation Coronary Lesion

Drug eluting stents. Where are we now and what can we expect in 2003? Tony Gershlick Leicester

Final Kissing Ballooning Returns? The analysis of COBIS II registry

eucalimus - First Experience

TRIAS HR Pilot Study

DRUG-COATED BALLOONS AND CORONARY BIFURCATION LESIONS

Stent Thrombosis: Patient, Procedural, and Stent Factors. Eugene Mc Fadden Cork, Ireland

Insight from Nordic III

The Spectrum of Dedicated Stents for Bifurcation Lesions: Current Status and Future Projections. Martin B. Leon, MD

8th Emirates Cardiac Society Congress in collaboration with ACC Middle East Conference Dubai: October Acute Coronary Syndromes

Bifurcation Stenting. European Bifurcation Club update. Ioannis Iakovou, MD Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center Athens, Greece

INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION DEVICE DESCRIPTION CLINICAL PROGRAM FIRST-IN-MAN CLINICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE AMAZONIA SIR STENT...

COMPARE Trial Elvin Kedhi Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands

Y. Louvard, ICPS, Massy, France. TCT Asia Pacific 2010

Transcription:

EBC - Prague 26-28 september 2008 Insight from the CACTUS trial The role of final kissing balloon inflation F. Airoldi,, A. Colombo San Raffaele Scientific Institute EMO Centro Cuore,, Columbus Hospital Multimedica IRCCS Milan, Italy

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS and PARTICIPATING CENTERS Antonio Colombo, San Raffaele, Milan Italy Ezio Bramucci, Policlinico S.Matteo, Pavia Imad Sheiban, A.O. Molinette,Torino Roberto Violini, Ospedale S.Camillo, Roma Salvatore Saccà, P.O. di Mirano, Mirano (VE) G. Niccoli Policlinico A. Gemelli, Roma Leonardo Bolognese, Azienda USL 8, Arezzo Mario Orlandi, Azienda Ospedaliera di Lodi, Lodi C. Lettieri, R. Zanini, A.O. Carlo Poma, Mantova Leonardo Paloscia, Ospedale Santo Spirito, Pescara J. Shoffer Hamburg University Card. Center, Germany Eberhard Grube, Helios Heart Center, Siegburg, Germany

Study Design and Time Frame n = 350 patients TRUE de de novo TRUE bifurcation lesions of of the the native coronary arteries R Crush CYPHER SELECT n = 1771 Pre-dilatatio dilatation 1 month Clinic. F/U 6 month Angio. F/U 12, 12, 18, 18, 24 24 month Clinical F/U R = randomization Provisional T CYPHER SELECT n = 1731 Dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended in all pts for at least 6 months

Study endpoints Primary angiographic endpoint: bifurcation in-segment restenosis (lumen diameter stenosis > 50%) at six-months Primary clinical endpoint: major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 6 and 12 month Secondary angiographic endpoint: minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and percent of stenosis (%) on both branches at 6 months Study hypothesis: 25% restenosis in the Prov.-T and 10% in the Crush. Analysis performed by intention to treat.

Clinical characteristics (I) Crush (n=177) Prov.-T (n=173) Age (years) 64±10 66±10 0.12 Gender (M/F) 142/35 132/41 0.37 Diabetes (%) 23.7 22.0 0.69 Hypercholesterolemia (%) 63.8 70.5 0.18 Hypertension (%) 70.6 79.8 0.05 Current smokers (%) 20.3 16.8 0.66 LVEF (%) 55±9 57±8 0.08 P

Clinical characteristics (II) Crush (n=177) Prov.-T (n=173) Previous MI (%) 44.6 35.3 0.07 Previous PTCA (%) 31.1 26.6 0.35 Previous CABG (%) 4.5 5.8 0.59 Family history of CAD (%) 46.9 35.8 0.11 Unstable angina (%) 44.0 47.4 0.15 Stable angina (%) 31.1 36.4 0.78 Silent ischemia (%) 17.5 13.3 0.08 P

Lesion location Crush (n=177) Prov.-T (n=173) 19% 7% 25% 5% 74% 70% LAD-DIAG. LCX-OM RCA-PDA-PL

Lesion location Plaque Distribution Type 1A Type 1B 2A Type 2A 3B Type 2B Type Type 3A4 Type 1B 3B Type 3A 4 proxima distal 75% 3% 3 % 1% 16 % 1% 0.5% True bifurcation lesion (94%)

Procedural characteristics Crush (n=177) Prov.-T (n=173) MB SB MB SB Predilatation (%) 89.8 89.8 90.8 90.8 IVUS (%) 3.4 2.8 4.1 2.3 NO final kissing inflation in 14 les in the CRUSH arm 17 les in the PROV-T arm Total stent length (mm) 23.8 ± 5.9 17.9 ± 5.0 22.2 ± 5.7* 18.1 ± 6.2 (54 lesions) Max pressure (atm) 15.7 ± 4.3 13.4 ± 3.4 16.4 ± 4.1 12.0 ± 2.4* Final kissing (%) 92.1 90.2 IIb-IIIa GP inhibitors (%) 22.6 17.3 31% (54/173) NEEDED PROVISIONAL STENTING IN THE SB * = p<0.05 for comparisons between crush and prov.-t

6-month in-segment binary restenosis Angiographic F.U. performed in 86% of pts in both groups Crush (n=177) Prov.-T (n=173) % 4.6 6.7 13.2 14.7 N 7/152 N 10/150 N 20/152 N 22/150 (main branch) (side branch)

30 days MACE (days 0-30) Crush T-Prov Q wave MI 3 (1.7%) 2 (1.1%) 1.00 Non-Q wave MI 15 (8.5%) 12 (6.9%) 0.69 TLR 3 (1.7%) 1 (0.5%) 0.63 TVR (including TLR) 3 (1.7%) 1 (0.5%) 0.63 Death 0 0-6-month MACE (days 31-180) MI 1 (0.5%) 1 (0.5%) 1.00 TLR 10 (5.6%) 10 (5.8%) 1.00 TVR (including TLR) 11 (6.2%) 12 (6.8%) 0.83 Death 0 1* (0.5%) 0.49 *= non cardiac death (ischaemic stroke confirmed by autopsy)

Stent thrombosis Total Acute (first day) Subacute (days 2-30) Late (days 31-180) Crush (n=177) Prov.T (n=173) 3 (1.7%) 2 (1.1%) 1 (0.5%) 2* (1.1%) 0 0 1 (0.5%) 1 (0.5%) (definitive) p = 0.62 for comparisons between crush and prov.-t * One patient did not take thienopyridine therapy after discharge

Final kissing inflation not performed (no FKI)

Final kissing balloon inflation YES NO P value Myocardial infarctions 7.5% (24/319) 29.0% (9/31) <0.0001 Stent thrombosis 0.9% (3/319) 6.5% (2/31) 0.06

Final kissing balloon inflation YES NO P value MB restenosis SB restenosis 4.7% 16% 0.03 11.9% 36% <0.001

Conclusions - 31% cross over from provisional to 2 - No difference in cumulative 6-months MACE and in binary in-segment restenosis both in the main branch and in the side branch. - No difference in 6-month stent thrombosis: (1.7% with crush vs 1.1% with prov.-t; p=0.62) - The lack of FKI is associated to a significant increase in MI, stent thrombosis and angiographic restenosis

QCA measurements Crush (n=177) Prov.-T (n=173) MB SB MB SB Reference diam. (mm) 2.85 ± 0.33 2.30 ± 0.31 2.74 ± 0.35* 2.16 ± 0.33* Lesion length (mm) 15.8 ± 8.7 5.9 ± 4.7 14.7 ± 8.2 5.7 ± 4.2 Baseline MLD (mm) 0.90 ± 0.38 0.84 ± 0.32 0.83 ± 0.33 0.83 ± 0.30 Baseline stenosis (%) 68 ± 12 63 ± 12 69 ± 12 61 ± 13 Final MLD (mm) 2.71 ± 0.32 1.94 ± 0.39 2.58 ± 0.33* 1.65 ± 0.39* Final stenosis (%) 12 ± 6 16 ± 11 13 ± 6 27 ± 14* 6-month MLD (mm) 2.24±0.52 1.66 ± 0.51 2.19±0.58 1.52 ± 0.54* 6-month stenosis (%) 25 ± 14 30 ± 19 25 ± 16 31 ± 22 Angiographic follow-up performed in 86% of patients in both groups * = p<0.05 for comparisons between crush and prov.-t

Stent thrombosis 1 2 3 4 5 Crush Crush Crush Prov.-T Prov.-T Days from procedure 1 7 6 7 72 Thienopyridine Yes Yes No stop day 1 Yes Yes Number of 2+1 1+1 2+1 1 1+1 Total stent length (mm) 83 65 72 13 41 Final kissing Yes No Yes Yes No Diabetes No No Yes Yes No Lesion location LAD-diag. LAD-diag LAD-diag LAD-diag RCA Clinical consequences Q-wave MI and TLR Non Q-wave MI and TLR Q-wave MI and TLR Q-wave MI and TLR Q-wave MI and TLR