Hepatitis C: New Therapies in

Similar documents
STATE OF THE ART Update: Treatment Options 2016 Mark Sulkowski, MD

Direct-acting Antiviral (DAA) Regimens in Late-stage Development: Which Patients Should Wait? Fred Poordad, MD

Genotype 1 HCV in 2016: Clinical Decision Making in a Time of Plenty

HCV Treatment Failure: What Next? Dr Ashley Brown, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London

TREATMENT OF GENOTYPE 2

Hepatitis C in Special Populations

HCV Resistance Clinical Aspects. Sanjay Bhagani Royal Free Hospital/UCL London

Massimo Puoti SC Malattie Infettive AO Ospedale Niguarda Cà Granda, Milano. Eradicazione da HCV e nuove prospettive: Prospetive Terapeutiche future

Antivirals for the treatment of chronic HCV infection: Bench to Bedside and beyond

5/12/2016. Learning Objectives. Management of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2 or 3 Infected Treatment-Naive or Experienced Patients

Rapid Response from San Francisco: The Latest in the HCV Treatment Revolution

Saeed Hamid, MD Alex Thompson, MD, PhD

Hepatitis C Resistance Associated Variants (RAVs)

Hepatitis C Treatment 2014

Learning Objective. After completing this educational activity, participants should be able to:

NS5A inhibitors: ideal candidates for combination?

Treatment of HCV in 2016

CCO Official Conference Coverage: Clinical Impact of New Data From AASLD 2015

Treatment of HCV infection in daily clinical practice. Which are the optimal options for Genotypes 2 and 3? Jiannis Vlachogiannakos

VIRAL LIVER DISEASE. OAG Post DDW Course Westin Prince, Toronto, June 13-14, 2015

Expert Perspectives: Best of HCV from EASL 2015

Viva La Revolución: Options to Combat Hepatitis C

How to optimize treatment in G3 patients? Jérôme GOURNAY, MD Hépatologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes France

Hepa%%s C elimina%on needs involvement of all turn the page. Graham R Foster Professor of Hepatology Queen Mary University of London

Evolution of Therapy in HCV

HCV Treatment of Genotype 1: Now and in the Future

Clinical Management: Treatment of HCV Mono-infection

What is the Optimized Treatment Duration? To Overtreat versus Undertreat. Nancy Reau, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Chicago

Treatments of Genotype 2, 3,and 4: Now and in the future

VII CURSO AVANCES EN INFECCIÓN VIH Y HEPATITIS VIRALES

Rome, February nd Riunione Annuale AISF th AISF ANNUAL MEETING

HCV Update from AASLD 2016

Cases: Management of Hepatitis C in Prior Treatment Failure

EASL 2013 Interferon Free, All Oral Regimens for Hepatitis C. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

2017 Bruce Lucas Hepatology and Liver Transplant Symposium October 13th 2017 Management of Hepatitis C in Pre- and Post-Transplant Patients

A treatment revolution: current management for chronic HCV

8/5/2014. A new era of HCV clinical management. Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C. Goal of HCV treatment is viral cure HIV HBV HCV

Latest Treatment Updates for GT 2 and GT 3 Patients

Management of HCV in Prior Treatment Failure

Case. 63 year old woman now with:

Current trends in CHC 1st genotype treatment

New developments in HCV research and their implications for front-line practice

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir-Voxilaprevir in DAA-Experienced GT 1-6 POLARIS-4

Treatment of Unique Populations Raymond T. Chung, MD

Need to Assess HCV Resistance to DAAs: Is it Useful and When?

HCV Management in Decompensated Cirrhosis: Current Therapies

Case 4: A 61-year-old man with HCV genotype 3 with cirrhosis. Ira M. Jacobson, M.D. Weill Cornell Medical College New York, New York USA

A One-day Scientific Conference: Updates on Hepatitis C Treatments along with Consensus on Management of Hepatitis C in Iran

HCV-G3: Sofosbuvir with ledipasvir or daclatasvir?

Disclosures. Advanced HCV management. Overview. Renal failure 1/10/2018. Research Grant support to UCSF from AbbVie Gilead Merck Proteus NIH

Update in the Management of Hepatitis C: What Does the Future Hold

David L. Wyles, MD Chief, Division of Infectious Disease Denver Health Medical Center Denver, Colorado

Update on the Treatment of HCV

Initial Treatment of HCV G Hugo E. Vargas, MD Professor of Medicine Medical, Director Office of Clinical Research Mayo Clinic Arizona

What Should We Do With Difficult to Treat HCV Populations?

The Changing World of Hepatitis C

Introduction. The ELECTRON Trial

HCV therapy : Clinical case

Future strategies with new DAAs

Current HCV Treatment by Genotype

Feeling right at home

The HCV Pipeline Ira M. Jacobson, MD, FACP, FACG, AGAF. Slide Presentation. IFN-free DAA combinations (G1)

Disclosures. I have given sponsored lectures for the following pharmaceutical companies: Gilead, Abbvie and MSD. I own shares of Gilead Sciences.

HCV Treatment in 2016

Hepatitis C Introduction and Overview

10/21/2016. David L. Wyles, MD Chief, Division of Infectious Disease Denver Health Medical Center Denver, Colorado

HCV In 2015: Maximizing SVR

SURVEYOR-II Part 2 Study Design

IFN-free for Genotype 1 HCV: the current landscape. Prof. Graham R Foster

Interferon-based and interferon-free new treatment options

Selecting HCV Treatment

Abstract LB-12. POLARIS-2: Pangenotypic Single Tablet Regimen with Inhibitors of HCV NS5B (Nucleotide) + NS5A + NS3

ICVH 2016 Oral Presentation: 28

HCV: The next 18 months. David L. Wyles, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine UCSD

Individual Optmizaton of therapy. Graham R Foster Professor of Hepatology QMUL

Direct Acting Antivirals for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Infection

PIB. Next Generation Direct-Acting Antivirals. Collectively: G/P. Pibrentasvir (formerly ABT-530) pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor

Eliminating Hepatitis C from New Zealand

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 1)

Pivotal New England Journal of Medicine papers 2014 Phase 3 Trial data

Kristen M. Marks, MD Assistant Professor Weill Cornell Medical College New York, New York

Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint

Current HCV Treatment by Genotype Empire Liver Foundation Ira M. Jacobson, MD

PEARL-I. Ombitasvir + Paritaprevir + Ritonavir +/- Ribavirin in HCV GT4. Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced

The ASTRAL Program Abstracts LB-2, LB-12, 205, 209

Update on chronic hepatitis C treatment: current trends, new challenges, what next?

SVR Updates from the 2013 EASL

HEPATITIS C: UPDATE AND MANAGEMENT

Is HCV drug resistance an issue?

New Therapeutic Strategies: Polymerase Inhibitors

Antiviral agents in HCV

On Target for Hepatitis C Elimination: Direct Acting Antiviral Agents in 2018

Current HCV Treatment by Genotype Ira M. Jacobson, MD

Hepatitis C: Newest Treatment Options and What To Do When We Cure It!

Shorter Durations and Pan-genotypic Regimens The Final Frontier. Professor Greg Dore

Norah Terrault, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Surgery Director, Viral Hepatitis Center University of California San Francisco

Updates on the AASLD/IDSA HCV Guidance

What s new in HCV/HIV coinfection therapy?

HCV in 2017: New Therapies and New Opportunities. Presentation prepared by: Date prepared: OBJECTIVES

Universal HCV treatment: Strategies for simplification

Transcription:

Hepatitis C: New Therapies in 216-217 Mark Sulkowski, MD Professor of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Medical Director, Viral Hepatitis Center Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Gastroenterology/Hepatology Baltimore, Maryland

Current HCV direct acting antiviral regimens cure the majority of persons treated in phase 3 trials Receptor binding and endocytosis Highly efficacious DAAs target different points in the HCV lifecycle 1 Transport and release New England Journal of Medicine trials in GT 1 published in 214 2 96% Fusion and uncoating Virion assembly Translation and polyprotein processing (+) RNA ER lumen NS3 protease inhibitors Membranous web LD LD ER lumen LD NS5A inhibitors RNA replication Nucleos(t)ide and Nonnucleoside NS5B inhibitors 368/ 3826 Sustained Virologic Response [SVR] 1. Lindenbach BD, Rice CM. Nature 25;436(Suppl):933 8; 2. Liang J, Ghany MG. N Engl J Med 214;37:243 7; 3. Burki T. Lancet Infect Dis 214;14:452 3

New HCV DAAs where is the unmet medical need? Access to effective HCV treatment Regional registration of novel DAAs HCV treatment without the need for baseline assessment of genotype and/or RAVs Pangenotypic High barrier to emergence of resistant variants Shorter therapy Reduce cost Increase treatment capacity Curative treatments for persons who fail first course regimens

HCV treatment regimens available in 216 217 Antiviral NS3 NS5A Nuc Non- NS5B Nuc NS5B RBV IFN Narlaprevir (216) Paritaprevir/ritonavir/Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir Asunaprevir/Daclatasvir/Beclabuvir 1a only Grazoprevir/Elbasvir FDC (216) ABT493/ABT53 (217) Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir FDC Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir FDC (216) Sofosbuvir + Daclatasvir Sofosbuvir + Simeprevir MK3682/MK848/Grazoprevir FDC (218) Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir/GS9857 FDC (217)

Novel DAAs [Registration pathway outside of the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency]

Phase III PIONEER Study: Narlaprevir + PegIFN/RBV International multicenter randomized placebo-controlled doubleblind study 42 non-cirrhotic naïve and treatment-experienced patients with GT1 12 weeks of Narlaprevir 2 mg QD + Ritonavir mg QD + PR + 12 weeks of PR Randomization 2:1 to Narlaprevir/Ritonavir and placebo (28 patients on Narlaprevir) 27 Naives Narlaprevir/r + PegIFN/RBV PegIFN/RBV + Placebo PegIFN/RBV PegIFN/RBV Follow-up Follow-up 15 PegIFN/RBV failurers Narlaprevir/r + PegIFN/RBV PegIFN/RBV + Placebo PegIFN/RBV PegIFN/RBV Follow-up Follow-up Weeks 4 12 24 36 48 6 72 Unblinding Interim analysis SVR 24 In active-treatment group SVR 24 In placebo group 6

Patients Phase III PIONEER Study SVR24 by Fibrosis Stage Narlaprevir/r + PegIFN/RBV % 9% 8% 7% 85,6% 88,2% All Treatment-naive Previously treated 95,% 91,9% 87,2% 82,5% 78,8% 75,% 71,6% 65,7% 66,7% 6% 5% 53,3% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 77/9 82/93 52/63 23/35 57/62 57/6 34/39 15/2 2/28 26/33 16/24 8/15 F F1 F2 F3 F F1 F2 F3 F F1 F2 F3 LOD = LLOQ <15 IU/mL 7

Phase III PIONEER Study: Safety Data Adverse events, % (n) Narlaprevir/r + PegIFN/RBV N=282 Placebo + PegIFN/RBV N=138 Most common adverse events list (>1% of cases) Neutropenia 47,5% (134) 54,4% (75) Leukopenia 35,5% () 39,9% (55) Influenza-like illness 29,1% (82) 31,9% (44) Asthenia 27,3% (77) 26,1% (36) Hemoglobin decrease 24,1% (68) 23,2% (32) Pyrexia 23,4% (66) 21,7% (3) Anaemia 22,7% (64) 22,5% (31) Thrombocytopenia 19,5% (55) 22,5% (31) Weight decrease 16,31% (46) 2,3% (28) Alopecia 15,25% (43) 8,7% (12) Headache 12,8% (36) 11,6% (16) Cough 8,9% (25) 12,3% (17)

NS5A Inhibitor + NS3 Protease Inhibitor [ nuke sparing ]

Grazoprevir Elbasvir Combination Therapy for Treatment-Naive Cirrhotic and Noncirrhotic Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1, 4, or 6 Infection: A Randomized Trial Ann Intern Med. 215;163(1):1-13. doi:1.7326/m15-785

Grazoprevir/Elbasvir: Impact of baseline NS5A RAVs in patients with HCV 1a and 1b infection GT1a-infected EBR/GZR 12 Weeks (No RBV): Lower SVR with key RAVS Population sequencing is adequate for clinical interpretation [no need for deep sequencing] RAV Position SVR12 Patients with RAVs (NGS 1% ST) SVR12 Patients with RAVs (PopSeq) 28 61/68 (89.7%) 29/33 (87.9%) 3 14/23 (6.9%) 4/1 (4.%) 31 15/23 (65.2%) 5/13 (38.5%) 93 9/14 (64.3%) 5/8 (62.5%) GT1b-infected EBR/GZR 12 Weeks (No RBV): No impact of RAVS RAV Position SVR12 Patients with RAVs (PopSeq) 28 4/4 (.%) 3 16/16 (.%) 31 17/19 (89.5%) 93 21/22 (95.5%) Jacobson I, et al. 66th AASLD; San Francisco, CA; November 13-17, 215; Abst. LB-22.

Prevalence GZV/EBR: longer treatment (16 weeks) and addition of RBV lead to high SVR rate in patients with baseline NS5A RAVs (positions 28, 3, 31 and 93) Efficacy of EBR/GZR 16/18 Weeks (+ RBV) in GT1a PR Non-responders with Baseline NS5A RAVs Population Sequencing EBR RAVs NS5A Class RAVs Next-Generation Sequencing at 1% ST EBR RAVs NS5A Class RAVs No RAVs: 51/52 (98%) No RAVs: 44/52 (85%) No RAVs: 48/52 (92%) No RAVs: 38/52 (73%) 51 51 1 1 44 44 8 8 48 48 4 4 38 38 14 14 Jacobson I, et al. 66th AASLD; San Francisco, CA; November 13-17, 215; Abst. LB-22.

C-SURFER: Grazoprevir/Elbasvir in patients with Stage 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Treatment Wk 12 Follow-up Wk 4 Follow-up Wk 16 Randomized period SVR12* GT1 HCV-infected pts with stage 4/5 CKD (n = 224) Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (n = 111) Placebo (n = 113) Open-label period Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (n = 113) 99% 98% Grazoprevir/elbasvir dosed orally mg/5 mg once daily 76% on dialysis 55% with diabetes 52% GT1a, 48% GT1b 6% cirrhosis Roth D, et al. Lancet. 215;386:1537-1545. *Modified full analysis set population (mfas).

SURVEYOR-I and -II: High SVR in non-cirrhotic patients with ABT-493 + ABT-53 for 8 weeks in G1/2 and 12 weeks in G4/5/6 SVR12 (%) Study design SVR12 following ABT-493 + ABT-53 for 8 weeks (G1/2) or 12 weeks (G4/5/6) SURVEYOR-I G1 non-cirrhotic TN or P/R exp SURVEYOR-II G2 non-cirrhotic TN or P/R exp SURVEYOR-I (part 2) G4/5/6 non-cirrhotic TN or P/R exp ABT-493 (3 mg) + ABT-53 (12 mg) ABT-493 (3 mg) + ABT-53 (12 mg) ABT-493 (3 mg) + ABT-53 (12 mg) SVR12 SVR12 Week 8 12 2 24 8 6 4 2 97 98 33/34 53/54 22/22 1/1 11/11 G1 G2 G4 G5 G6 8 weeks (ITT) 12 weeks Gane E, et al. EASL 216, Barcelona. #SAT-137; Poordad F, et al. EASL 216, Barcelona. #SAT-157

Patients (%) High SVR rates with ABT-493 + ABT-53 for 8 weeks (non-cirrhotic) and 12 weeks (cirrhotic) in patients with GT3 infection Muir et al. 29 patients without cirrhosis treated with ABT493 + ABT53 for 8 weeks (no RBV) No virologic failure No SAE or DC due to AE Kwo et al. 48 patients with cirrhosis and no prior treatment 12 weeks ABT 493 + 53 ± RBV No virologic failure No impact of baseline RAVs including Y93H/N No benefit observed with RBV 5 Muir et al: SVR12 97 1 patient withdrew consent after TW6: UND HCV RNA at time of d/c 28/29 28/28 SVR12 Kwo et al: SVR12 mitt SVR12 Muir A, et al. EASL 216, Barcelona. PS98

SVR12 (% pts) n=6 n=22 n=22 MAGELLAN-1 Study: ABT-493 and ABT-53 in non-cirrhotic, GT1 infected patients who have failed DAA-containing regimens ABT-493 ABT-53 ABT-493 ABT-53 RBV ABT-493 ABT-53 2 mg 8 mg 3 mg 12 mg 8 mg 3 mg 12 mg Arm stopped early, inadequate results of dose-finding studies in pts across all genotypes Day Wk 12 Wk 24 Wk 36 SVR12 15/16 (94%) 1a; 3D+RBV failure Breakthrough NS3:Y 56H, D168A/T NS5A:M28V, Q3L/R [CATEGO RY NAME] [CATEGO RY NAME] SVR12 9/1 (9%) 1a; DCV, TVR, PR failure Relapse; NS5A: L31M, H58D [CATEGO RY NAME] SVR12 SVR12 6/6 (%) [CATEGO RY NAME] SVR12 15/15 (%) % SVR12 in 1 pts with Y93 NS5A RAVs % SVR12 in 26 pts w/ Q8 or R155 NS3 RAVs % SVR12 in 17 pts w/ prior failure of a SOFcontaining regimen 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 91 86 6/6 2/ 22 ITT 19/ 22 6/6 95 2/ 21 mitt 95 19/ 2 BT 1 1 Relapse 1 1 LTFU 1 2 -- -- -- Poordad F, et al. EASL 216, Barcelona. #GS11

NS5A inhibitor + NS5B Nucleotide Analogue Polymerase inhibitor

HCV suppression by nucleos(t)ide analogue NS5B polymerase inhibitors Sofosbuvir, β-d-2'-deoxy-2'-α-fluoro-2'-β-cmethyluridine nucleotide prodrug (21) Potent HCV suppression with sofosbuvir alone, with ribavirin or with both interferon/ribavirin (21) Sofia J Med Chem 21 Gane NEJM 213 HCV Drug Development Advisory Group

SVR12 (%) ASTRAL-1, 2, and 3: Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) FDC for 12 weeks SVR12 by Genotype 98 98 99 95 97 8 6 4 2 relapse 2 LTFU 1 WC 1 LTFU 11 relapse 2 others 1 death 2 115 135 323 328 237 238 264 277 116 116 Total GT1 GT2 GT3 GT4 GT5 GT6 34 35 41 41 Jacobson IM. HEPDART 215

ASTRAL-4: SOF/VEL in patients with CTP B cirrhosis n=9 n=87 n=9 Wk Wk 12 Wk 24 Wk 36 SOF/VEL SOF/VEL + RBV SOF/VEL SVR12 SVR12 SVR12 267 treatment-naive or - experienced G1 6 with Child B cirrhosis 55% treatment-experienced MELD <15 = 95% Ascites 75 83%; encephalopathy 58 66% 8 6 4 2 SOF/VEL 12 wk SOF/VEL+RBV 12 wk 94 83 88 96 85 86 92 5 5 75/ 9 82/ 87 77/ 9 6/ 68 65/ 68 65/ 71 Overall G1 G3 G2, 4, and 6 7/ 14 11/ 13 6/ 12 86 G2 3/4 G2 4/4 G2 4/4 G4 2/2 G4 4/4 G4 2/2 G6 1/1 Breakthrough, n - 1 1 - - - - 1 1 - - - Relapse, n 11 2 7 5 1 3 6 1 4 - - - LTFU, n 1-3 1-3 - - - - - - Death, n 3 2 2 2 2-1 - 1 - - 1 Charlton MR, et al. AASLD 215, San Francisco. #LB-13

Resistance analysis in 1284 patients with G1 6 HCV infection treated with SOF/VEL in the ASTRAL 1-4 studies Overall prevalence of RAVs: NS5A: 36% Only Y93 variants considered NS5A specific RAV for velpatasvir ASTRAL 1 3 SVR12 (%) 8 6 No RAVs RAVs 99 98 97 97 89 (1% cutoff) SVR12 in ASTRAL-4 (G1 4) SOF/VEL NS5A RAVs - +RBV* 58/6 (97%) NS5A RAVs + 24/25 (96%) 4 2 637/ 643 Overall G1 G2 G3 G4 6 VF: 13 373/ 38 251/ 251 2 73/ 75 Both G1a 7/ 7 162/ 162 224/ 23 1 39/ 44 91/ 91 / Baseline: Q3±L31: n=2 Post-VF: Y93: n=2 Baseline: A3K, n=1 Y93, n=4 None, n=5 Post-VF: Y93, n=1 Hezode C, et al. EASL 216, Barcelona. #THU-216

Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir and Placebo Adverse events occurring in >5% of patients Patients, n (%) SOF/VEL 12 wk n=135 Placebo 12 Week (N = 116) Headache 296 (29) 33 (28) Fatigue 217 (21) 23 (2) Nausea 135 (13) 13 (11) Insomnia 87 (8) 11 (1) Nasopharyngitis 121 (12) 12 (1) Diarrhoea 73 (7) 8 (7) Cough 57 (6) 4 (3) Irritability 49 (5) 4 (3) Arthralgia 56 (5) 9 (8) Back pain 56 (5) 11 (1) Asthenia 58 (6) 9 (8) Jacobson IM. HEPDART 215

NS5A inhibitor + NS3 Protease Inhibitor + NS5B Nucleotide Analogue Polymerase inhibitor

SOF/VEL + Voxilaprevir (VOX,GS-9857) for 12 weeks in treatment-experienced (including DAAs) patients with HCV GT1-6 SVR12 (%) Baseline Characteristic VEL/SOF + GS-9857 Cirrhosis, n (%) 61 (48) Mean HCV RNA, log 1 IU/mL (range) HCV genotype, n (%) 6.3 (3.8 8.1) 1 63 (49) 2 21 (16) 3 35 (27) 4/6 9 (7) DAA experience, n (%) None (G2 6 only) 27 (21) 1 DAA class 36 (28) 2 DAA classes 65 (51) Lawitz E, et al. EASL 216, Barcelona. #PS8 8 6 4 2 SVR12 (overall and by genotype) 99 97 127/ 128 63/63 21/21 34/35 9/9 Overall G1 G2 G3 G4/6 1 pt relapsed at post-treatment Wk 8 128 patients enrolled

SOF/VEL + VOX for 12 weeks in treatment-experienced G1 6 pts, including those previously treated with DAAs 98 99 97 8 6 4 67/67 6/61 92/93 35/35 27/27 35/36 65/65 2 Resistance analysis No Yes Cirrhosis No Yes Prior NS5A experience * 1 2 No. of DAA classes *G2 6 pts who failed PR SVR12 (%) by subgroup Lawitz E, et al. EASL 216, Barcelona. #PS8

SOF/VEL + VOX for 6 or 8 weeks in treatment-naïve, HCV GT 1-6 infected patients ± cirrhosis SVR12 (%) Two Phase 2 studies of 6 or 8 weeks of SOF/VEL (4/ mg) + GS-9857 ( mg) QD G1 6 (pangenotypic) Treatment naive US and New Zealand G1 6 n=166 G1 n=31 SOF/VEL FDC + GS-9857 SOF/VEL FDC + GS-9857 SOF/VEL FDC + GS-9857 + RBV SVR12 SVR12 SVR12 Week 6 8 18 2 Baseline characteristics SOF/VEL + GS-9857 6-week n=67 SOF/VEL + GS-9857 8-week n=99 SOF/VEL + GS-9857 + RBV 8-week n=31 Mean age, y (range) 53 (18 72) 55 (19 76) 59 (43 71) Male, n (%) 35 (52) 61 (62) 19 (61) White, n (%) 58 (87) 81 (82) 26 (84) Mean BMI, kg/m 2 (range) 26 (18 42) 29 (19 47) 29 (19 52) IL28B CC, n (%) 23 (34) 27 (27) 12 (39) Cirrhosis, n (%) 63 (64) 31 () Mean HCV RNA, log 1 IU/mL (range) 6.2 (3.6 7.6) 6.1 (4.7 7.4) 6.3 (5.4 7.3) G1, n (%) 35 (52) 69 (7) 31 () G2, n (%) 6 (9) 6 (6) G3, n (%) 21 (31) 18 (18) G4, n (%) 5 (7) 5 (5) G5, n (%) G6, n (%) 1 (1) Gane E, et al. EASL 216, Barcelona. #SAT-138 8 6 4 2 HCV G1 SVR12 by cirrhosis status 71 SOF/VEL + GS-9857 6 week No cirrhosis 94 SOF/VEL + GS-9857 8 week SOF/VEL + GS-9857 8 week Cirrhosis 81 25/35 36/36 31/33 25/31 SOF/VEL + GS-9857 + RBV 8 week

SVR12 (%) SVR12 (%) Short-duration treatment with SOF/VEL + VOX in treatmentnaive G1-6 HCV-infected patients with or without cirrhosis 8 6 4 2 HCV G2-6 SVR12 by genotype and cirrhosis status (all failures were HCV relapse No cirrhosis 88 67 6 28/32 4/6 21/21 3/5 Overall G2 G3 G4 SOF/VEL + GS-9857 6 weeks Cirrhosis 93 94 83 8 6 4 2 28/3 6/6 17/18 5/6 Overall G2 G3 G4,6 SOF/VEL + GS-9857 8 weeks Phase III, global clinical trials are ongoing (POLARIS Studies) SOF/VEL/VOX FDC for 8 Weeks compared to SOF/VEL FDC for 12 Weeks in DAA-naïve patients SOF/VEL/VOX FDC for 12 Weeks in DAA-experienced patients SOF/VEL/VOX FDC for 12 weeks or SOF/VEL FDC for 12 weeks DAA-experienced patients without prior treatment with a NS5A inhibitor SOF/VEL/VOX FDC for 8 Weeks or SOF/VEL for 12 Weeks for patients with HCV GT 3 and cirrhosis Gane E, et al. EASL 216, Barcelona. #SAT-138

SVR24 (%) Phase 2 C-CREST 1 and 2: GZR/MK-848/MK-3682 (novel nucleotide NS5B inhibitor) for 8 weeks in non-cirrhotic patients with in HCV GT 1, 2 and 3 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 23/ 23 23/ 23 87 69 SVR12=91% (21/23) 1 late LTFU had achieved SVR12 24/ 24 2/ 23 11/ 16 MK-3682 (3 mg)/gzr/ebr MK-3682 (45 mg)/gzr/ebr MK-3682 (3 mg)/gzr/mk-848 MK-3682 (45 mg)/gzr/mk-848 6 9/ 15 71 1/ 14 Gane E, et al. EASL 216, Barcelona. #SAT-139 94 86 86 SVR12=9% (19/21) 1 late LTFU had achieved SVR12 15/ 16 18/ 21 19/ 22 G1 G2 G3 95 2/ 21 91 2/ 22

New HCV DAAs where is the unmet medical need? Access to effective HCV treatment Narlaprevir DAAs registered regionally (e.g., Ravidasvir in Egypt) HCV treatment without the need for baseline assessment of genotype and/or RAVs + Pangenotypic + Shorter therapy + Curative treatments for persons who fail first course regimens SOF/VEL with or without VOX ABT-493 + ABT53 Grazoprevir + MK848 + MK3682