Aktuelle Therapiestrategien beim peripheren T-NHL , Hannover

Similar documents
Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma. Pro auto. Peter Reimer. Klinik für Hämatologie / intern. Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation

Is there a Role for Upfront Stem Cell Transplantation in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: YES!

Today, how many PTCL patients are cured? Steven M. Horwitz M.D. Associate Attending Lymphoma Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Should peripheral T-cell lymphoma be treated by autologous or allogeneic SCT?

T-cell Lymphomas Biology and Management

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: nobody knows what to do...

Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form NAME :James O. Armitage, M.D AFFILIATION: University of Nebraska Medical Center

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) Specified and Unspecified. Eric Van Den Neste Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles

TCH em Linfomas T. Fábio R. Kerbauy

Prognostic Factors for PTCL. Julie M. Vose, M.D., M.B.A. University of Nebraska Medical Center

Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas. Original Policy Date

Mantle cell lymphoma Allo stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory patients

Aggressive Lymphomas - Current. Dr Kevin Imrie Physician-in-Chief, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Changing the landscape of treatment in Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma

Aggressive NHL and Hodgkin Lymphoma. Dr. Carolyn Faught November 10, 2017

Policy for Central Nervous System [CNS] Prophylaxis in Lymphoid Malignancies

PET-CT in Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma: To Be or Not To Be

East Midlands Cancer Network Guidelines for diagnosis and management of mature T cell and NK cell lymphomas (excluding cutaneous T cell lymphoma)

REVIEW. KEY WORDS: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Systematic evidencebased review, Therapy, Adult

Treatment outcomes of IMEP as a front-line chemotherapy for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas

Dr. A. Van Hoof Hematology A.Z. St.Jan, Brugge. ASH 2012 Atlanta

Large cell immunoblastic Diffuse histiocytic (DHL) Lymphoblastic lymphoma Diffuse lymphoblastic Small non cleaved cell Burkitt s Non- Burkitt s

Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin s Lymphomas

MANAGEMENT OF LYMPHOMAS

Outcomes of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma in first complete remission: data from three tertiary Asian cancer centers

Aggressive B-cell lymphomas and gene expression profiling towards individualized therapy?

Updates in T cell Lymphoma

Controversies and Approaches to T cell Lymphoma Therapy in 2016

Recent diagnostic and therapeutic innovations of T-cell-lymphoma. Prof. Nossrat Firusian, Recklinghausen, Germany

Radiotherapy in aggressive lymphomas. Umberto Ricardi

The treatment of DLBCL. Michele Ghielmini Medical Oncology Dept Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona

Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Haploidentical Transplants for Lymphoma. Andrea Bacigalupo Universita Cattolica Policlinico Gemelli Roma - Italy

Update: Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma

CAR-T cell therapy pros and cons

Thomas Klingebiel und Ewa Koscielniak

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Matt Ahearne Clinical Lecturer, Leicester

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Protocol applies to non-hodgkin lymphoma involving any organ system except the gastrointestinal tract.

Is there a role of HDT ASCT as consolidation therapy for first relapse follicular lymphoma in the post Rituximab era? Yes

The Role of Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed / Refractory Hodgkin s Lymphoma

Lymphoma/CLL 101: Know your Subtype. Dr. David Macdonald Hematologist, The Ottawa Hospital

Change Summary - Form 2018 (R3) 1 of 12

2010 Hematopoietic and Lymphoid ICD-O Codes - Alphabetical List THIS TABLE REPLACES ALL ICD-O-3 Codes

2012 Hematopoietic and Lymphoid ICD-O Codes - Numerical List THIS TABLE REPLACES ALL ICD-O-3 Codes

Corporate Medical Policy

Autologous SCT in FL No!

EBMT2008_22_44:EBMT :29 Pagina 454 CHAPTER 30. HSCT for Hodgkin s lymphoma in adults. A. Sureda

Hematopoietic Stem-Cell & Clinical Coverage Policy No: 11A-11 Bone Marrow Transplantation Amended Date: March 1, 2017 For Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma

Medical Policy Manual. Date of Origin: May Topic: Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Non- Hodgkin Lymphomas

The Role of Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed / Refractory Hodgkin s Lymphoma

What are the hurdles to using cell of origin in classification to treat DLBCL?

Autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in lymphoma

Haemato-Oncology ESMO PRECEPTORSHIP PROGRAMME IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY. Development and clinical experience Monique Minnema, hematologist

The role of stem cell transplant for lymphoma in 2017

CNS Lymphoma. Las Vegas-- March 10-12, 2016

Reduced-intensity Conditioning Transplantation

What is the best approach to the initial therapy of PTCL? standards of treatment? Should all

Interim PET in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.The GEL/TAMO experience

HSCT in Burkitt Lymphoma

Aggressive B and T cell lymphomas: Treatment paradigms in 2018

Appendix 6: Indications for adult allogeneic bone marrow transplant in New Zealand

THE ACT-1 and ACT-2 TRIALS

NON HODGKINS LYMPHOMA: AGGRESSIVE Updated June 2015 by Dr. Manna (PGY-5 Medical Oncology Resident, University of Calgary)

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EHA/ICML Bendamustine in the Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Rituximab in the Treatment of NHL:

AIH, Marseille 30/09/06

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in lymphoma. Catherine Hildyard Haematology Senior Registrar Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

R/R DLBCL Treatment Landscape

Supplementary Appendix to manuscript submitted by Trappe, R.U. et al:

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Rituximab and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Non- Hodgkin's Lymphoma

OSCO/OU ASH-SABC Review. Lymphoma Update. Mohamad Cherry, MD

MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 1: , 2013

Lymphoma- Med A-new drugs and treatments

Choice of upfront treatment in the management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma

Clinical Policy Bulletin: Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Non- Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Bendamustine is Effective Therapy in Patients with Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Dr Claire Burney, Lymphoma Clinical Fellow, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, UK

WHO Classification. B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small T-cell granular lymphocytic leukemia

Defined lymphoma entities in the current WHO classification

KEY WORDS: Peripheral T cell lymphoma, Unspecified, Clinical outcomes, Prognostic factors

Simposio COSA È CAMBIATO NELL APPROCCIO TERAPEUTICO DEI LINFOMI NON HODGKIN DEL PAZIENTE ANZIANO?

The role of radiotherapy and intrathecal CNS prophylaxis in extralymphatic craniofacial aggressive B-cell lymphomas

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

Dr. Andrea Gallamini - Hematology Department Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle Cuneo Italy

Aggressive lymphomas ASH Dr. A. Van Hoof A.Z. St.Jan, Brugge-Oostende AV

Combinations of morphology codes of haematological malignancies (HM) referring to the same tumour or to a potential transformation

Overview. Table of Contents. A Canadian perspective provided by Isabelle Bence-Bruckler, MD, FRCPC

Dr. Nicolas Ketterer CHUV, Lausanne SAMO, May 2009

AHSCT in Hodgkin lymphoma - indication and challenges. Bastian von Tresckow German Hodgkin Study Group Cologne University Hospital

Radiotherapy in DLCL is often worthwhile. Dr. Joachim Yahalom Memorial Sloan-Kettering, New York

Is there still a role for autotransplant with follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era. Pr. Christian Gisselbrecht Hôpital Saint Louis Paris, France

CARE at ASH 2014 Lymphoma. Dr. Diego Villa Medical Oncologist British Columbia Cancer Agency Vancouver Cancer Centre

Clinical Policy: Bendamustine (Bendeka, Treanda) Reference Number: PA.CP.PHAR.307

Confronto Real world e studi registrativi

Lymphoma: The Basics. Dr. Douglas Stewart

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Keywords Relapse/refractory. DLBCL. Immunochemotherapy. Introduction

Transcription:

Aktuelle Therapiestrategien beim peripheren T-NHL 16.1.2009, Hannover Bertram Glass Asklepios Klinik St.Georg, Hamburg Abteilung Hämatologie und Stammzelltransplantation

Mature (peripheral) T-NHL Histologic Subtypes Adult T-cell lymphoma/leukemia (HTLV1+) Aggressive NK-cell leukemia T-cell granular lymphocytic leukemia Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, T/null cell primary systemic type (ALCL) Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, T/null cell primary cutaneous type Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise characterised (PTL) Mycosis fungoides / Sezary syndrome Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma Hepatosplenic gamma-delta T-cell lymphoma Enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma

Prognostic factors in aggressive NHL Histology: T-NHL Gisselbrecht, Blood 1998 92:76 9.1.2009 3

Prognostic factors in aggressive T-NHL Is ALCL ALK- better than PTCL-NOS? ALCL ALK- PTCL NOS Savage et al., Blood online (2008) doi:10.1182/blood-2008-01-134270 9.1.2009 4

T-CELL LYMPHOMAS in Studies of the German High-Grade Lymphoma Study Group N. Schmitz, M. Ziepert, M. Nickelsen, L. Trümper,, M. Löffler, A. Ho, Metzner, N. Peter, M. Pfreundschuh December 5, 2008 GERMAN HIGH-GRADE GRADE NHL STUDY GROUP (DSHNHL)

T-cell lymphomas in DSHNHL trials Histologic subtypes by reference pathology (n=329) DSHNHL n % ALC/ALK+ 73 22.2 ALC/ALK- 108 32.8 58.3% ALC/ALK unknown 11 3.3 PTCL 68 20.7 AILT 28 8.5 T/NK 18 5.5 Lymphoblastic 7 2.1 Intestinal T/NK 2 0.6 Hepatosplenic ÄÅ 2 0.6 Subcutaneous panniculitis-like 1 0.3 T-cell, NOS 8 2.4 T-cell, subtype technically not possible 3 0.9

T-cell lymphomas in DSHNHL trials Which patient from which trial? (n=329) DSHNHL trial n age LDH IPI treatment NHL-B1 98 18-60 = N all aaipi CHO(E)P-14 or -21 NHL-B2 40 61-75 all all IPI > 0 CHO(E)P-14 or -21 High/CHOEP phase II 13 18-60 all* all aaipi hi-choep-21 vs. hi-choep-14 High/CHOEP phase III 61 18-60 all aaipi 0,1 hi-choep-21 vs. CHOEP-21 Mega/CHOEP phase II 33 18-60 > N all aaipi > 0 MegaCHOEP dose escalation Mega/CHOEP phase III 25 18-60 all aa IPI 2,3 MegaCHOEP vs. CHOEP-14 RICOVER-60 59 61-80 all all IPI > 0 6 x CHOP-14 vs. 8 x CHOP-14 * LDH > N, any LDH after amendement recruitment period: Oct 1993 - Feb 2006 median observation time: 43 months

T-cell lymphomas in DSHNHL trials Event-free survival - histological subtypes (n=295) DSHNHL Proportion 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 1: ALK+ (n= 73) 2: ALK- (n= 108) 3: PTCL (n= 68) 4: AILT (n= 28) 5: T/NK (n= 18) p-values: 2 3 4 5 1 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 <0.001 2 0.361 0.897 0.468 3 0.468 0.947 4 0.494 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Months

ALK-negative and other T-cell lymphomas Event-free survival according to IPI score (n=234) DSHNHL 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 IPI 0-1 vs. 2: p=0.004 IPI 2 vs. 3: p=0.395 IPI 3 vs. 4-5: p=0.017 EFS 3y ALK+: 75.1% (95% CI: 64.5%-85.7%) ALK-: 46.8% (95% CI: 37.2%-56.4%) PTCL: 42.0% (95% CI: 30.0%-54.0%) AILT: 48.8% (95% CI: 29.8%-67.8%) T/NK: 38.1% (95% CI: 15.4%-60.8%) Proportion 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Months IPI 0-1 (n=118) IPI 2 (n= 57) IPI 3 (n= 33) IPI 4-5 (n= 26)

ALK-negative and other T-cell lymphomas NHL-B1 trial (= 60 years, LDH = N, n=57), EFS: role of etoposide DSHNHL 1 0.9 0.8 Proportion 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 6x CHOEP-14/21 (n=28) 6x CHOP-14/21 (n=29) 0.2 0.1 p=0.065 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Months 3 years EFS rate: with Etoposide: 63.2% (95% CI: 45.0%-81.4%) without Etoposide: 48.3% (95% CI: 30.1%-66.5%)

CHO(E)P + Alemtuzumab-Konsolidierung DSHNHL 2003-1: Ergebnisse no CAM: 12 (29.3%) CAM: 29 (70.7%) 1 PRO 1 PRO CHO(E)P CHO(E)P CHO(E)P CHO(E)P CHO(E)P CHO(E)P Alemtuzumab 133 mg/4w 1 PRO 2 NC 1 Stadium 1A 1 PRO 2 NC 1 ALK+ 3 andere

CHO(E)P + Alemtuzumab-Konsolidierung DSHNHL 2003-1: Ergebnisse EFS OS 1 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 <= 60 Jahre (n=27) > 60 Jahre (n=14) 0.9 0.8 0.7 <= 60 Jahre (n=27) > 60 Jahre (n=14) 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Monate Monate

Alemtuzumab + CHOP Design: Phase II Studie 24 konsekutive Patienten mit PTL Gallamini et al, Blood 2007; 110(7): 2316-2323

Alemtuzumab + CHOP Design: Phase II Studie 24 konsekutive Patienten mit PTL Gallamini et al, Blood 2007; 110(7): 2316-2323

DSHNHL 2006-1B Primärtherapie für PTCL bei älteren Patienten (>60 J.) DSHNHL A C A C A C A C A C A C 30 H 30 H 30 H 30 H 30 H 30 H mg O mg O mg O mg O mg O mg O n=150 P P P P P P R C H O P C H O P C H O P C H O P C H O P C H O P n=150 A = Alemtuzumab

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as First-line Therapy in T-cell lymphoma 83 pts 4-6 CHOP 65 pts DexaBEAM 55 pts HDT and TBI 18 pts (22%) (ITT population) 22 pts (27%) relapsed 3-year PFS 36% Reimer et al., JCO 2009; 27:106

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as First-line Therapy in T-cell lymphoma Ergebnisse: Progression Free Survival, ITT Reimer et al., JCO 2009; 27:106

Phase II / III study in aggressive B- and T-cell lymphoma MegaCHOEP DSHNHL PBPC PBPC PBPC mchoep 1 mchoep 2 mchoep 3 mchoep 4 CYC 1500 ADR 70 VCR 2 ETO 600 PRD 500 CYC 4500 ADR 70 VCR 2 ETO 600 (960) PRD 500 CYC 4500 ADR 70 VCR 2 ETO 600 (960) PRD 500 CYC 6000 ADR 70 VCR 2 ETO 1480 PRD 500

Phase II / III study in aggressive B- and T-cell lymphoma MegaCHOEP Event-free survival according to histology DSHNHL Nickelsen et al., manuscript in preparation

Patients with Mature T-Cell Lymphoma Show High Relapse Rates after High Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation M Nickelsen, C Canals, C Kyriakou, N Schmitz, M Engelhardt, T Relander, W Linkesch, V Koza, G Meloni, D Caballero, A López-Guillermo, K Indrac, H Wandt, N Theorin, B Glaß, A Sureda on behalf of the Lymphoma Working Party of EBMT EBMT Slide template Barcelona 7 February 2008 ASH Annual Meeting San Francisco December 2008 The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

ASCT in ptcl: Study design Retrospective EBMT study Mature T-cell lymphoma (PTCL NOS, AILT, ALCL) High dose therapy and autologous SCT in EBMT centres between 2000 and 2005 n = 394 patients The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

ASCT in ptcl: histologic subtypes Peripheral T-cell lymphoma NOS 176 (45%) Anaplastic large cell lymphoma 98 (25%) ALK pos 19 (5%) ALK neg 42 (10%) ALK unknown 37 (9%) Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma 120 (30%) The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

ASCT in ptcl: patient characteristics n = 394 Male (%) 62.9 Age at diagn. (years) 49.7 (14-72) Stage III/IV (%) 71.6 LDH > N (%) 57.8 IPI high / high-intermediate (%) 36.2 > 2 previous treatment lines (%) 67 ECOG > 2 at SCT (%) 3 Transplanted within 1 year (%) 65 BEAM-like conditioning (%) 77 TBI-based conditioning (%) 9 The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

ASCT in ptcl: Patients transplanted in CR 1 (n=145) 1.0 0.8 At 3 years PFS: 66% RR: 33% NRM 3.3% 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 Months after ASCT The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

ASCT in ptcl: Patients transplanted with chemosensitive disease (n=199) 1.0 0.8 At 3 years PFS: 47% RR: 49% NRM 3% 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 Months after ASCT The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

ASCT in ptcl: Patients transplanted with chemorefractory disease (n=18) 1.0 0.8 At 3 years PFS: 15% RR: 61% NRM 22% 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 Months after ASCT The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

ASCT in ptcl: Multivariate Cox analysis for NRM and Relapse Rate Risk factors for non-relapse mortality p-value relative risk (95% CI) Poor Performance status 0.2 3.2 (1.2-9.1) Refractory disease at ASCT <0.001 6.7 (3.0-14.9) Risk factors for relapse rate Trend: male gender p-value relative risk (95%CI) Sensitive disease vs CR1 0.001 1.9 (1.3-2.7) Refractory disease vs CR1 0.001 3.3 (1.7-6.3) PTCL NOS 0.02 1.4 (1.1-2) Trends: age > 60 years, IPI high/ high intermediate The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

T-NHL Allogeneic SCT : Relapse rates by type of transplant: EBMT data 1990-2006 auto allo 1,00 1,00 0,80 0,80 Relapse or Prog 0,60 0,40 CR Sensitive disease Relapse or Prog 0,60 0,40 0,20 Refractory disease 0,20 0,00 0 24 48 72 96 120 Months after SCT 0,00 0 24 48 72 96 120 Months after SCT 9.1.2009 28

Aggressive NHL (n= 111) Myeloablative allogeneic SCT from related and unrelated donor Kim et al., Blood 2006; 108: 382-9 9.1.2009 29

T-NHL RIC allogeneic SCT Thiotepa 10 mg/kg Fludarabine 30 mg/mq Cyclophosphamide 30 mg/kg MTX MTX MTX -6-4 -3-2 -1 0 +1 +3 +6 +30 +60 +70 +90 +120 +150 +180 Allo-SCT MRD monitoring Cyclosporine P. Corradini 9.1.2009 30

Update in relapsed PTCL Patients Characteristics n= 38 Age 44 (15-64) No. lines (range) 2 (1-4) Previous autologous SCT 54% CR pre-allogeneic SCT 35% PR pre-allogeneic SCT 40% Median time diagnosis to allo-sct 15 months (6-99 months) P. Corradini personal communication

Update in relapsed PTCL Results, Overall survival 100 Median Follow-up 50 months 75 53% OS % 50 25 0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 time (months) 21 of 38 patients are alive (n=19 in CR, n=2 with disease) 12 death of disease 5 death of NRM P. Corradini personal communication

ALK negatives T-NHL Phase III Studie: HDT + ASCT vs allo SCT in der Erstlinienbehandlung first-line treatment of mature (peripheral) T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), patients Ç60 years inclusion criteria Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspec d (PTCLu) Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AIL) Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK negative Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type Enteropathy type T-cell lymphoma Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma Subcutaneous panniculitis type T-cell lymphoma all stages and IPI except stage I with aaipi 0 R C H O P C H O P C H O P C H O P C H O P C H O P C H O P C H O P CR, PR, NC Restaging CR, PR, NC Restaging D H A P D H A P B E A M F B C A S C T S C T days 1 15 29 43 64-4 - 6 weeks - R = At diagnosis, patients are randomized to allogeneic or autologous transplantation. Donor search (family or unrelated) will be initiated only in patients randomized to allogeneic transplantation. Patients randomized to allogeneic tx but without a donor will receive autologous tx. Peripheral blood stem cells are harvested after DHAP in patients who are to receive autologous tx (randomized or crossed over from the allogeneic transplant arm because no donor is available). ASCT = autologous stem cell transplantation, SCT = allogeneic stem cell transplantation 9.1.2009 33

T-NHL Zusammenfassung Ä Unter vergleichbarer Therapie haben ALCL ALK- und andere mature T-NHL eine erhebliche schlechtere Prognose als aggressive B-NHL. Bei mehr als 1 IPI Risikofaktor liegt das EFS bei < 30 % Ä Ohne IPI-Risikofaktoren werden mit konventioneller Chemotherapie akzeptable Ergebnisse erzielt. CHOEP dem CHOP vermutlich überlegen. Ä Alemtuzumab verbessert potentiell die Ergebnisse einer Chemotherapie. Entsprechende Phase III-Studie für Patienten > 60 Jahre überprüft die Wirksamkeit. Ä HHDT und autologe SZT sinnvolle konsolidierende Therapie für Patienten mit chemosensiblem T-NHL. Rate primär chemo-refraktärer T-NHL ist hoch (ca. 30%). Nach HDT und SZT ist die Rezidivrate bedeutsam. PFS (Intent to treat) zwischen 30% und 40% nach 3 Jahren Ä Periphere T-NHL sind empfindlich für den GVL-Effekt der allogenen Stammzelltransplantation. Bei Rezidivpatienten EFS zwischen 40 % und 70% nach 3 Jahren. Ä Der Stellenwert der allogene SZT in der primären Behandlung der T-NHL wird in einer Phase III Studie überprüft. 9.1.2009 34

Aggressive B-NHL Einladung B Studientreffen der DSHNHL 2009 24. und 25. April 2009 Anmeldung: dshnhl@uks.eu 9.1.2009 35

B ÄANHANG 9.1.2009 36

T-cell lymphomas in DSHNHL trials Histologic subtypes by reference pathology (n=329) n % ALC/ALK+ 73 22.2 ALC/ALK- 108 32.8 58.3% ALC/ALK unknown 11 3.3 PTCL 68 20.7 AILT 28 8.5 T/NK 18 5.5 Lymphoblastic 7 2.1 Intestinal T/NK 2 0.6 Hepatosplenic ÄÅ 2 0.6 Subcutaneous panniculitis-like 1 0.3 T-cell, NOS 8 2.4 T-cell, subtype technically not possible 3 0.9 DSHNHL 05.12.2008

T-cell lymphomas in DSHNHL trials Which patient from which trial? (n=329) trial n age LDH IPI treatment NHL-B1 98 18-60 = N all aaipi CHO(E)P-14 or -21 NHL-B2 40 61-75 all all IPI > 0 CHO(E)P-14 or -21 High/CHOEP phase II 13 18-60 all* all aaipi hi-choep-21 vs. hi-choep-14 High/CHOEP phase III 61 18-60 all aaipi 0,1 hi-choep-21 vs. CHOEP-21 Mega/CHOEP phase II 33 18-60 > N all aaipi > 0 MegaCHOEP dose escalation Mega/CHOEP phase III 25 18-60 all aa IPI 2,3 MegaCHOEP vs. CHOEP-14 RICOVER-60 59 61-80 all all IPI > 0 6 x CHOP-14 vs. 8 x CHOP-14 * LDH > N, any LDH after amendement recruitment period: Oct 1993 - Feb 2006 median observation time: 43 months DSHNHL 05.12.2008

T-cell lymphomas in DSHNHL trials Event-free survival - histological subtypes (n=295) Proportion 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Months ALK+: 75.1% (95% CI: 64.5%-85.7%) ALK-: 46.8% (95% CI: 37.2%-56.4%) 3-years EFS-rate: PTCL: 42.0% (95% CI: 30.0%-54.0%) AILT: 48.8% (95% CI: 29.8%-67.8%) T/NK: 38.1% (95% CI: 15.4%-60.8%) DSHNHL 05.12.2008 1: ALK+ (n= 73) 2: ALK- (n= 108) 3: PTCL (n= 68) 4: AILT (n= 28) 5: T/NK (n= 18) p-values: 2 3 4 5 1 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 <0.001 2 0.361 0.897 0.468 3 0.468 0.947 4 0.494

T-cell lymphomas in DSHNHL trials ALK-negative and other T-cell lymphomas Event-free survival according to IPI score (n=234) 1 0.9 0.8 IPI 0-1 vs. 2: p=0.004 IPI 2 vs. 3: p=0.395 IPI 3 vs. 4-5: p=0.017 Proportion 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 IPI 0-1 (n=118) IPI 2 (n= 57) IPI 3 (n= 33) IPI 4-5 (n= 26) 0 DSHNHL 05.12.2008 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Months 3-years EFS-rate: IPI 0-1: 58.2% (95% CI: 49.0%-67.4%) IPI 2: 35.4% (95% CI: 22.7%-48.1%) IPI 3: 29.5% (95% CI: 13.6%-45.4%) IPI 4-5: 11.5% (95% CI: 0.0%-23.8%)

T-cell lymphomas in DSHNHL trials ALK-negative ALCL and other T-cell lymphomas NHL-B1 trial (= 60 years, LDH = N, n=57), EFS: role of etoposide 1 0.9 0.8 Proportion 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 6x CHOEP-14/21 (n=28) 6x CHOP-14/21 (n=29) 0.2 p=0.065 0.1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Months DSHNHL 05.12.2008 3 years EFS rate: with Etoposide: 63.2% (95% CI: 45.0%-81.4%) without Etoposide: 48.3% (95% CI: 30.1%-66.5%)

DEUTSCHE STUDIENGRUPPE HOCHMALIGNE NON-HODGKIN-LYMPHOME* German High Grade Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma Study Group - DSHNHL Phase II / III study in aggressive B- and T-cell lymphoma MegaCHOEP PBPC PBPC PBPC mchoep 1 mchoep 2 mchoep 3 mchoep 4 CYC 1500 ADR 70 VCR 2 ETO 600 PRD 500 CYC 4500 ADR 70 VCR 2 ETO 600 (960) PRD 500 CYC 4500 ADR 70 VCR 2 ETO 600 (960) PRD 500 CYC 6000 ADR 70 VCR 2 ETO 1480 PRD 500

Mega-CHOEP study (Phase I/ II) event-free survival months T-cell lymphomas except ALK-positive ALCL Nickelsen et al., submitted

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as First-line Therapy in T-cell lymphoma PFS Reimer et al., JCO 2009; 27:106

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as First-line Therapy in T-cell lymphoma 83 pts 4-6 CHOP 65 pts DexaBEAM 55 pts HDT and TBI 48 pts (58%) in CR 18 pts (22%) (ITT population) 22 pts (27%) relapsed Reimer et al., JCO 2009; 27:106 3-year PFS 36%

High-risk Relapse of aggressive NHL Intermediate Conditioning, GVHD-Prophylaxis by Rituximab anhl 18-65 y ER (1 y) PD Post ASCT S no allopbsc MRD MUD MMF Tacrolimus Salvage Therapy CR PR SD R F 25 F 25 F 25 B 4 F 25 B 4 F 25 B 4 C 60 C 60 MMF R 375 R 375 R 375 R 375 Tacrolimus R 375 R 375 R 375 R 375 w-8 w-5 d-9 d-8 d-7 d-6 d-5 d-4 d-3 w3 w4 w5 w6 w25 w26 w27 w28

DSHNHL 2004-R3 Patient characteristics Age (median, years) range 49,6 21-65 Gender % male 73.3 female 26.7 Prior transplant % none 28.3 1 38.3 2 23.3 Duration of last remission < 12 months 79.3 > 12 months 20.7 Stage at Tx % CR 7.2 I / II 32.7 III / IV 60.0 LDH at Tx % elevated 51.9 normal 48.1 a-ipi at Tx % 0 / 1 48.1 2 / 3 51.9

DSHNHL 2004-R3 Overall Survival and Histology 1,0 0,9 T-NHL DLBCL 0,8 0,7 0,6 OS 1y: 47 % OS 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1 0,0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Time after SCT (months)

Progression Free Survival 100 PFS (%) 75 50 25 52% 0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 time (months) Median time to Relapse 140 days (range, 38-603 days) Median Follow-up 50 months

Outcome according to different subtypes PFS (%) 100 75 50 25 unspecified ALCL AILD other 0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 time (months)

T-NHL HDT and autologous SCT (retrospective) Author Year n HDT CR OS Relapsed/Refractory Vose 1990 17 diverse 59% 35% (2y) Jagasia 2001 25 (8 allo) diverse - 74% (3y) Rodriguez 2001 29 diverse 79% 39% (3y) Song 2003 36 Melph/Eto 42% 48% (3y) Haider 1999 14 (6 ALCL) Cyc/Eto (Thio) 50% 30m (med OS) Relapsed/First-line Kingreen 1999 27 (only AIL) diverse 68% 10.8m (med OS) Blystad 2001 40 (14 ALCL) diverse 80% 58% (3y) Rodriguez 2003 115 (24 ALCL) diverse 68% 56% (5y) Jantunen 2004 37 (14 ALCL) BEAC/BEAM 76% 54% (5y) 35% Non-ALCL 9.1.2009 51

ASCT in ptcl: Conclusion High dose therapy and ASCT are feasible and safe for patients with chemosensitive T-cell lymphoma Even for patients transplanted in first CR, relapse rate is relatively high Patients with chemorefractory disease do not benefit from high dose therapy and ASCT Further studies are necessary to identify patients who can be cured by ASCT The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

HDT / ASCT in T cell lymphoma as part of primary treatment Prospective Phase II Trials Corradini (Leukemia 2006) Lopez-Guillermo (ASH 2006, #3070) Reimer (ASH 2005, #2074) D`Amore (ASH 2006, #401) n 62 (incl.19 ALK+ ALCL) 41 (no ALK+ ALCL) 65 (no ALK+ ALCL) 121 (no ALK+ ALCL) Median age 43y 47y 49y 55y Regimen 1) 2xAPO>22 APO>2xDHAP ÄHD Mito./Mel 2) MACOP-B>HD AraC/Mito ÄBEAM 3xmaxiCHOP + 3xESHAP altern. 4-6xCHOP-21 + DexaBEAM ÄHD Cy + TBI 6xCHOEP-14 ÄBEAM ASCT (%) 74% 41% 65% 73% CR/PR pre Tx 56%/16% 49%/10% 47%/26% 50%/35% TRM 4,8% 3% 3% 4% OS 34% (12y) [21%*] 39% (4y) 50% (3y) 67% (3y) EFS / FFS/PFS 30% (12y) 18%* 30% (4y) n.d. n.d. Follow-up 76mo 3,9yrs (survivors) 10mo after Tx med. 24mo [* Non ALK+ ALCL]

T-NHL RIC allogeneic SCT median follow-up 44 months 100 100 specified OS(%) 75 50 54% OS (%) 75 50 58% 51% unspecified 25 25 p= 0.76 0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 months N = 20 alive (n= 18 CR, n= 2 relapse) N= 15 death (n= 12 disease, n= 3 TRM ) 0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 months P. Corradini 9.1.2009 54

T-cell lymphomas in DSHNHL trials ALK-negative ALCL and other T-cell lymphomas NHL-B1 trial (= 60 years, LDH = N, n=57), OS: role of etoposide 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 6x CHOEP-14/21 (n=28) Proportion 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 6x CHOP-14/21 (n=29) 0.2 p=0.430 0.1 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Months DSHNHL 05.12.2008 3-years OS-rate: with Etoposide: 74.2% (95% CI: 57.5-90.9%) without Etoposide: 68.8% (95% CI: 51.9-85.6%)

T-cell lymphomas in DSHNHL trials ALK-negative ALCL and other T-cell lymphomas RICOVER60 trial (60-80 years, n=51), EFS according to number of cycles 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Proportion 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 6x CHOP-14 (n=28) 8x CHOP-14 (n=23) 0.1 p=0.729 0 DSHNHL 05.12.2008 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Months 3-years EFS-rate: 6x CHOP-14: 35.7% (95% CI: 17.9-53.5%) 8x CHOP-14: 30.4% (95% CI: 11.6-49.2%)

DSHNHL 2003-1: Studiendesign CHO(E)P CHO(E)P CHO(E)P CHO(E)P CHO(E)P CHO(E)P Alemtuzumab 133 mg/4w 1 15 29 43 57 71 92 Tag - Referenzdiagnose entsprechend der Einschlusskriterien - CR, CRu, PR nach 6 Zyklen - keine aktive Infektion Binder et al., Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2007; 110: 3431a

T-NHL RIC allogeneic SCT Age 43 (15-64) No. lines (range) 2 (1-4) Previous autologous SCT 57% CR pre-allogeneic SCT 29% PR pre-allogeneic SCT 42% Median time diagnosis to allo-sct 17 months (6-99 months) P. Corradini 9.1.2009 58

T-NHL Neue Therapieansätze: A-CHOP Gallamini et al, Blood 2007; 110(7): 2316-2323 9.1.2009 59

DSHNHL 2006-1B Primärtherapie für PTCL bei älteren Patienten (>60 J.) A C A C A C A C A C A C 30 H 30 H 30 H 30 H 30 H 30 H mg O mg O mg O mg O mg O mg O n=150 P P P P P P R C H O P C H O P C H O P C H O P C H O P C H O P n=150 A = Alemtuzumab 9.1.2009 60

MegaCHOEP Phase II T vs B: EFS 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 B-Cell (n = 146) T-Cell ( Alk -) (n = 24) 0.5 0.4 p=0.0007 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 3-Year EFS (95% CI): B-Cell: 59.8% (51.7%; 67.8%) T-Cell ( Alk-): 25.0% ( 7.7%; 42.3%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time (years) 9.1.2009 61

Overall Survival (%) 100 75 50 25 A P=0.005 ALCL alk+ 62% non-alcl alk+ 21% Event-free Survival (%) 100 75 50 25 B ALCL alk+ non-alcl alk+ P=0.006 54% 18% Event-free Survival (%) 0 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 100 time (months) C P=0.02 75 IPI 0-1 50 25 IPI 2-3 0 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 time (months) 48% 24% Corradini et al. Leukemia 2006; 20(9): 1533-8 0 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 time (months) prognostic factors for auto-sct in PTCL: aaipi ALK-positivity pre-transplant CR 9.1.2009 62

T-NHL Histologischer Subtyp und Langzeitprognose 1.0 p<0.001 Overall Survival (proportion) 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Cut ALCL ALK-pos ALK-neg PTCLU AILT 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Time (Years) (Vose ASH 2005 811a) 9.1.2009 63

T-NHL Resultate der konventionellen Therapie Anthracycline-based (CHOP-like) regimen Treatment analog to aggressive B-NHL Poor outcome Author Year n 5y OS Comment Lippman 1988 20 15% Non-ALCL Coiffier 1990 108 med OS 42m Ascani 1997 168 (8y OS) 38% ALCL incl Melnyk 1997 68 39% ALCL incl López-G. 1998 174 (4y OS) 38% ALCL incl Kim 2002 78 36% ALCL incl Rüdiger 2002 96 26% Non-ALCL Huang 2004 106 22% Only NOS 9.1.2009 64

Aggressive B-Zell Non-Hodgkin-Lymphome Histologische Einteilung Follicular lymphoma 9690/3 grade 1-2 grade 3A / 3B Diffuse large B cell Lymphoma,NOS 9680/3 T-cell/histiocyte rich large B-cell lymphoma 9688/3 Primary DLBCL of the CNS 9680/3 Primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg, type 9680/3 EBV positive DLBCL of the elderly 9680/3 DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation 9680/3 B cell lymphoma unclassifiable DLBCL / Burkitt 9680/3 Primary mediastinal (thymic) B-cell lymphoma 9679/3 Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma 9712/3 ALK positive large B-cell lymphoma 9737/3 Plasmablastic lymphoma 9735/3 Large B-cell lymphoma in HHV8+ Castelman 9738/3 Primary effusion lymphoma 9678/3 B cell lymphoma unclassifiable HD / Burkitt 9596/3 Burkitt lymphoma 9687/3 WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoetic and Lymphoid Tissues 4th Edition, 2008 21.6.2006 65

DLBCL, NOS Histologische Varianten Diffuse large B cell Lymphoma,NOS 9680/3 Common morphologic variants centroblastic immunoblastic anaplastic Rare morphologic variants Molecular subgroups Germinal centre B-cell like (GCB) Activated B-cell-like (ABC) Immunhistochemical subgroups CD5-positive DLBCL Germinal centre B-cell-like (GCB) Non- Germinal centre B-cell-like (GCB) WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoetic and Lymphoid Tissues 4th Edition, 2008 21.6.2006 66

B-Zell Non-Hodgkin-Lymphome Häufigkeitsverteilungf WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoetic and Lymphoid Tissues 4th Edition, 2008 21.6.2006 67