IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INFORMATION. General Allegations. A. Introduction and Background

NDI: LOOKING BACK & AHEAD

FDA REGULATION OF DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS AND FOODS

Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 Public Law rd Congress

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTEN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Client Alert. FDA Draft Guidance Broadens New Dietary Ingredient Definition and Extends Notification Requirements 1

May 7, Dear Mr. Landa:

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

Taylor C. Wallace, PhD, CFS, FACN, March 22, 2018

Case 1:14-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:09-cv RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

Case 2:15-cv SRC-CLW Document 9 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 246

effect that the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act ( FSPTCA ), which was

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CIGARETTE FIRE SAFETY AND FIREFIGHTER PROTECTION ACT Act of Jul. 4, 2008, P.L. 518, No. 42 Cl. 35 AN ACT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HJR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

G O L D E N S E A L R O O T P O W D E R

FDLI ANNUAL CONFERENCE May 4, 2018

Putting the Nutritional Supplement Industry to the Test: Looking for Transparency

United States District Court

United States Court of Appeals

SENATE, No. 359 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

Food Additives Program

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED CANNABIS CORPORATION. Plaintiff, PURE HEMP COLLECTIVE INC.

Case: 5:15-cr DCR-REW Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/01/15 Page: 1 of 15 - Page ID#: 1

perpetuate -- and perhaps even intensify -- that controversy. 1 On July 18th, the Fifth Circuit affirmed FDA s longstanding position that

Case 2:12-cv KJM-GGH Document 1 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. (Sacramento Division)

Reishi D. International, Inc. 2/6/18

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1832

A. Concentrated Omega-3 Dietary Supplements Provide Recognized Health Benefits

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/26/18 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SFIREG Issue Paper: Pesticide Use on Cannabis State Established Pesticide Residue Action Levels

Senate File Introduced

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE RELATING TO TOBACCO

Case 1:19-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

April 13, In short, the Protocol is, at its core, flawed beyond repair for many reasons including, without limitation, the following:

The Marketing of a Food Ingredient Understanding a System that has Worked for 105 Years

Determining Whether A Dietary Supplement Study Requires an Investigational New Drug (IND)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

July 20, Via US Certified Mail and . Dr. Smith:

Case 1:15-cv RBJ Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. Case No.: Plaintiffs Tammie Aust, Alison Grennan, Jennifer Schill, and Lang You Mau, by and

The United Natural Products Alliance (UNPA) submits these comments in. response to the Food and Drug Administration s Draft Guidance on New Dietary

ACTION: Notification; declaratory order; extension of compliance date.

Iowa District Court Polk County, Iowa. CARL OLSEN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) Docket No. CV IOWA BOARD OF PHARMACY ) ) Respondent.

Parent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement

MEMORANDUM. David L. Thomas, Chief Executive Officer, American Dairy Products Institute

The Tobacco Control Act s Premarket Review Authorities: Reports on Substantial Equivalence and Exemption Requests (905(j))

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF NUTRITION AND HEALTH CLAIMS

Case: 3:17-cv wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The Shifting Federal Regulation of Cannabis Products

The Path to U.S. Market for Functional Food Ingredients

Case 2:09-cv DMC-CCC Document 1 Filed 03/20/2009 Page 1 of 95. Of Counsel:

TSDR Pharmacy Inc. dba brandmd Skin Care 11/9/17

The Safety and Effectiveness of Dietary Supplements

Case 1:17-cv ECF No. 1 filed 10/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case3:15-cv JCS Document1 Filed01/21/15 Page1 of 21

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

RE: Permits under the Arizona Pharmacy Act should not be required for dietary supplements

Case 2:18-cv JTF-dkv Document 1 Filed 09/25/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Senate Bill No. 225 Senators Farley, Hardy, Harris, Gustavson, Atkinson; Goicoechea and Settelmeyer

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

4. Together, defendants CCA and CCC represent the vast majority of chiropractors practicing in Connecticut.

Rock Solid Nutrition, LLC 12/22/16

FDA s Food Additives Program

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 21

Plaintiff, Comfort Dental Group, Inc. ( Comfort Dental ), by its attorneys, MOYE WHITE LLP, states: INTRODUCTION

L A W O F F I C E S HYMAN, PHELPS & MCNAMARA, P.C T H I R T E E N T H S T R E E T, N. W. S U I T E

Case 1:13-cr SCJ-JFK Document 1 Filed 01/22/13 Page 1 of 17 SEALED ATLANTA DIVISION

April 30, By Electronic Mail

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

City of Carson 701 E. Carson St., Carson, CA Telephone: (310) ; ci.carson.ca.us

Effective and Compliance Dates Applicable to Retailers, Manufacturers, Importers, and Distributors of Newly Deemed Tobacco Products

Case 1:17-cv RDM Document 1 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB

e-cigarette Regulation

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendant OLYMPUS AMERICA INC. ( OAI ) answers and asserts its affirmative

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 H 1 HOUSE BILL 933. Short Title: Informed Consent for HIV/AIDS Testing. (Public)

GENERAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS

Tobacco Sales - License Fee 1. No Indian owned outlet shall engage in the sale of tobacco products (as an "Indian tobacco outlet") on the Rese

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT HEARINGS BEFORE HEARING EXAMINER

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman HERB CONAWAY, JR. District 7 (Burlington)

Use of Light, Mild, Low, or Similar Descriptors in the Label, Labeling, or Advertising of Tobacco Products

Gyan Rai, PhD 06/04/2015

Decoding the Confusing Language of Vitamins. Yuliya Klopouh, M.H., Pharm.D

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

Case 3:10-cr ARC Document 137 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Transcription:

Case 1:13-cv-03675-WBH Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-3675-WBH Undetermined quantities of all articles of finished and in-process foods, raw ingredients (bulk powders, bulk capsules listed below, with any lot number, size or type container, whether labeled or unlabeled: Black Widow ECA XTREME FASTIN FASTIN-XR FASTIN powder FASTIN-XR bulk capsules Geranium powder Lipodrene Lipodrene HARDCORE Lipodrene HARDCORE bulk capsules Lipodrene XR Lipodrene XTREME LIPOTHERM Methylhexamine Natural Geranium Powder 25% Stimerex-ES YELLOW SCORPION YELLOW SCORPION bulk capsules YELLOW SCORPION powder and all articles of finished and in-process

Case 1:13-cv-03675-WBH Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 2 of 9 foods, raw ingredients (bulk powders, bulk capsules, containing 1,3-Dimethylamylamine HC1 (DMAA or its chemical equivalent, with any lot number, size, or type container, whether labeled or unlabeled, which are determined to consist in whole or in part of components, by their labeling or otherwise, to have originated outside the State of Georgia, and are located any- where on the premises of Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 5440 Oakbrook Parkway, Suite A, Norcross, Georgia, or elsewhere within the jurisdiction of this Court. Defendants. ANSWER AND JURY DEMAND ON BEHALF OF CLAIMANTS HI-TECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND JARED WHEAT COME NOW, Claimants Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ( Hi-Tech, and its sole shareholder Jared Wheat ( Wheat (collectively, the Claimants, by and through undersigned counsel, and file this Answer and Jury Demand, as follows: 1. Upon information and belief, the Claimants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the Complaint. 2. Upon information and belief, the Claimants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of the Complaint. 3. Upon information and belief, the Claimants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 of the Complaint. 2

Case 1:13-cv-03675-WBH Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 3 of 9 4. Upon information and belief, the Claimants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph 4 of the Complaint. 5. Upon information and belief, the Claimants admit that the abovelisted property contains DMAA or its chemical equivalent and has moved in interstate commerce. The Claimants deny that the articles of food are adulterated and deny that DMAA or its chemical equivalent is unsafe within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 348. 6. The Claimants deny that they hold the above-listed property illegally and deny that the property is liable to seizure, condemnation, and forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 334 and 7. Upon information and belief, the Claimants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph 7. 8. The Claimants deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 and 9. Upon information and belief, the Claimants admit the allegations contained in Paragraph 9. 10. The Claimants deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 10 and 11. The Claimants deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 and 3

Case 1:13-cv-03675-WBH Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 4 of 9 12. The Claimants deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 12 and 13. The Claimants deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 13 and AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 1. The Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 2. The conduct of the Plaintiff in bringing this action and in seizing the Defendant Properties amounts to a denial of Claimants rights to Due Process of Law under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 3. The conduct of the Plaintiff in bringing this action and in seizing the Defendant Properties constitutes a taking under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and requires that the Plaintiff pay Claimants just compensation for the complete loss of Defendant Properties. 4. Claimants assert the affirmative defense of good faith. The Government Has Not Shown the Products Are Adulterated 5. None of the Defendant Properties are subject to forfeiture under the laws of the United States. The Government s Complaint ignores the complex statutory scheme that regulates DMAA. Dietary supplements, including those manufactured, produced, marketed, distributed and sold by Hi- 4

Case 1:13-cv-03675-WBH Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 5 of 9 Tech, are regulated pursuant to the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act ( DSHEA, Pub. L. No. 103-417, 108 Stat. 4325 (1994, which amended the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ( FFDCA. 6. Under DSHEA, a dietary supplement is deemed adulterated if it presents a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury under the conditions of use recommended or suggested in labeling, or if no conditions of use are suggested or recommended in the labeling, under ordinary conditions of use. 21 U.S.C. 342(f(1(A. 7. Furthermore, under DSHEA, dietary supplements are regulated as a subset of foods, rather than drugs, unless the supplement producers assert disease claims that bring the supplement within the definition of a drug under the FFDCA. See 21 U.S.C. 321(ff (defining dietary supplement, (g(1 (defining drug ; see also 21 U.S.C. 343(r(6 (identifying claims that may be made by dietary supplement manufacturers and those claims which are prohibited. 8. Because dietary supplements are classified as foods, manufacturers and producers are not required to provide evidence of product safety or efficacy before marketing dietary supplement products. Dietary supplements are legally presumed to be safe. In any proceeding under DSHEA, the United States shall bear the burden of proof on each element to show that a dietary supplement is adulterated. 21 U.S.C. 342(f(1. Neither the 5

Case 1:13-cv-03675-WBH Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 6 of 9 Food and Drug Administration ( FDA nor the United States Attorney s Office has made any attempt to meet that burden. 9. DSHEA covers dietary ingredients. A dietary ingredient is defined as a vitamin, mineral, amino acid, herb or other botanical, or dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake, or a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract or combination of any dietary ingredient [from the preceding categories]. 21 U.S.C. 321(ff(1 (internal subsection divisions omitted. Dietary ingredients include both naturally occurring and synthetically produced versions of the same ingredient. The FDA has recognized the equivalence of natural and synthetically produced dietary ingredients in the context of several vitamins and other ingredients. 10. The above statutory framework applies generally to dietary ingredients marketed in the United States prior to October 15, 1994. Dietary ingredients introduced into the marketplace after that date, i.e., new dietary ingredients, require notification to the FDA at least 75 days prior to the marketing of the ingredient with information regarding the ingredient s safety. 21 U.S.C. 350b(a(2. 11. The effect of the above requirements is that, typically, the FDA only regulates or prevents the sale of adulterated dietary supplements on a 6

Case 1:13-cv-03675-WBH Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 7 of 9 product-by-product basis rather than on a class basis. To date, there has been only a single occasion in which the FDA has taken action against an entire class of dietary supplements through the above referenced procedures. See Final Rule Declaring Dietary Supplements Containing Ephedrine Alkaloids Adulterated Because They Present an Unreasonable Risk. 69 Fed. Reg. 6788 (February 11, 2004, codified at 21 C.F.R. 119.1. The FDA has not followed this procedure regarding dietary supplements that contain DMAA. 12. DMAA is a natural constituent of the geranium plant, Pelargonium graveolens. Geraniums (which contain DMAA have been marketed in the United States since before October 15, 1994. The plant s leaves are used in salads and its oil as a flavoring. No fewer than four published, peer-reviewed scientific studies have confirmed the presence of DMAA in the geranium plant. Large, established, and reputable laboratories, such as Cantox Health Sciences International, have confirmed the presence of DMAA in the geranium plant. 13. DMAA has been the subject of at least a dozen peer-reviewed scientific studies, making it one of the most studied botanical products in the United States. Two of these studies, commissioned and paid for by Hi-Tech, were of Hi-Tech products that contained DMAA. The Government is attempting to forfeit one of those products. None of the scientific studies regarding DMAA has raised any issue regarding its safety. Consumers have 7

Case 1:13-cv-03675-WBH Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 8 of 9 used products containing DMAA millions of times virtually without incident. CONCLUSION The Government s forfeiture action is without basis in law and should be dismissed. If the case is not dismissed, Claimants demand a jury trial in this action. Respectfully submitted this 7th day of January, 2014. s/ E. Vaughn Dunnigan Georgia Bar No. 234350 E. Vaughn Dunnigan, P.C. 2897 N. Druid Hills Road, Suite 142 Atlanta, GA 30329 Telephone: (404 982-7796 Email: evdunnigan@hotmail.com s/ Arthur W. Leach Georgia Bar No. 442025 5780 Windward Parkway, Suite 225 Alpharetta, Georgia 30005 Telephone: (404 786-6443 E-mail: art@arthurleach.com s/bruce S. Harvey Georgia Bar No. 335175 Office of Bruce S. Harvey 146 Nassau Street, N.W. Atlanta, GA 30303-2009 Attorneys for Claimants Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Jared Wheat 8

Case 1:13-cv-03675-WBH Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 9 of 9 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1(D Pursuant to Local Rules 5.1(C and 7.1(D, I hereby certify that the above document was prepared in Microsoft Word using 14-point Times New Roman font. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the above document was electronically filed using the CM/ECF system and was served upon counsel of record via electronic mail on this the 7th day of January, 2014. s/ E. Vaughn Dunnigan Georgia Bar No. 234350 E. Vaughn Dunnigan, P.C. 2897 N. Druid Hills Road, Suite 142 Atlanta, GA 30329 Telephone: (404 982-7796 Email: evdunnigan@hotmail.com 9