Gary S. Mintz,, MD. IVUS Observations in Acute (vs Chronic) Coronary Artery Disease: Structure vs Function

Similar documents
Imaging Overview for Vulnerable Plaque: Data from IVUS Trial and An Introduction to VH-IVUS Imgaging

IVUS Analysis. Myeong-Ki. Hong, MD, PhD. Cardiac Center, Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

Culprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Can IVUS Define Plaque Features that Impact Patient Care?

Imaging Atheroma The quest for the Vulnerable Plaque

Invasive Coronary Imaging Modalities for Vulnerable Plaque Detection

Coronary Artery Thermography

Assessment of Vulnerable Plaque by IVUS and VH-IVUS

Added Value of Invasive Coronary Imaging for Plaque Rupture and Erosion

Between Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve

The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR for LM Stenting

So-Yeon Choi, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiology Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea

Plaque Characteristics in Coronary Artery Disease. Chourmouzios Arampatzis MD, PhD, FESC

New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA

CT Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque. William Stanford MD Professor-Emeritus Radiology University of Iowa College of Medicine Iowa City, IA

The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

PCI for Left Anterior Descending Artery Ostial Stenosis

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

The Site of Plaque Rupture in Native Coronary Arteries

Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary lesions: Can You Handle the Pressure? Jeffrey A Southard, MD May 4, 2013

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY. Konstantina P. Bouki, FESC 2 nd Department of Cardiology General Hospital Of Nikea, Pireaus

Κλινική Χρήση IVUS και OCT PERIKLIS A. DAVLOUROS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF CARDIOLOGY INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY & CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

Plaque Shift vs. Carina Shift Prevalence and Implication

Assessment of plaque morphology by OCT in patients with ACS

IVUS-Guided d Provisional i Stenting: Plaque or Carina Shift. Soo-Jin Kang, MD., PhD.

OCT Findings: Lesson from Stable vs Unstable Plaques

IVUS vs FFR Debate: IVUS-Guided PCI

High-risk vulnerable plaques. Kostis Raisakis G.Gennimatas General Hospital of Athens

Chapter 43 Noninvasive Coronary Plaque Imaging

Integrating IVUS, FFR, and Noninvasive Imaging to Optimize Outcomes. Gary S. Mintz, MD Cardiovascular Research Foundation

PCI for Long Coronary Lesion

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Percutaneous Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Disease

Failure of positive. Recanalization and CTO formation. TCFA rupture with (fatal) thrombotic occlusion. TCFA Lipid pool

1st Department of Cardiology, University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece

OCT; Comparative Imaging Results with IVUS, VH and Angioscopy

2yrs 2-6yrs >6yrs BMS 0% 22% 42% DES 29% 41% Nakazawa et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:

Optical Coherence Tomography for Intracoronary Imaging

Imaging the Vulnerable Plaque. David A. Dowe, MD Atlantic Medical Imaging

IVUS Assessment of the Mechanism of In-stent Restenosis? Gary S. Mintz, MD Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Left main coronary artery (LMCA): The proximal segment

Angiographic Geometric Predictors of Myocardial Infarction Are Not Associated with Ultrasonographic Markers of Plaque Vulnerability CONCLUSION

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Ca Score

Intervention: How and to which extent is technology helping us?

Pathology of Vulnerable Plaque Angioplasty Summit 2005 TCT Asia Pacific, Seoul, April 28-30, 2005

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

as a Mechanism of Stent Failure

IVUS Virtual Histology. Listening through Walls D. Geoffrey Vince, PhD The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Declaration of conflict of interest. Nothing to disclose

Assessment of Vulnerable Plaques Causing Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Integrated Backscatter Intravascular Ultrasound

FFR and intravascular imaging, which of which?

RESTENOSIS Facing up to the problem

Noninvasive Coronary Imaging: Plaque Imaging by MDCT

Usefulness of OCT during coronary intervention

Can We Identify Vulnerable Patients & Vulnerable Plaque?

FFR= Qs/Qn. Ohm s law R= P/Q Q=P/R

Le espressioni della placca che preoccupano il clinico: progressione o vulnerabilità? CardioLUCCA Marzo 2017

Cottrell Memorial Lecture. Has Reversing Atherosclerosis Become the New Gold Standard in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease?

Clinical Value of OCT. Guidance for Coronary Stenting. Giulio Guagliumi, MD

Upgrade of Recommendation

대한심장학회춘계학술대회 Satellite Symposium

Unprotected LM intervention

Side Branch Occlusion

Cardiac CT Angiography

Title for Paragraph Format Slide

Post PCI functional testing and imaging: case based lessons from FFR React

Prognostic Value of Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

Anatomy is Destiny, But Physiology is Here Today

Management of Multivessel CAD: Stenting or CABG?

EBC London 2013 Provisional SB stenting strategy with kissing balloon with Absorb

Spotty Calcification Typifies the Culprit Plaque in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction An Intravascular Ultrasound Study

DES In-stent Restenosis

Pathology of Coronary Artery Disease

Can We Safely Defer PCI. Yes, already proven

Assessment of vulnerable plaque by OCT

Basics of Angiographic Interpretation Analysis of Angiography

Intravascular Ultrasound

Yukio Ozaki, M Okumura, TF Ismail 2, S Motoyama, H. Naruse, K. Hattori, H. Kawai, M. Sarai, J. Ishii, Jagat Narula 3

Calcium Removal and Plaque Modification in the Era of DEB and Contemporary Stenting for Femoro- Popliteal Disease

Three-vessel fractional flow reserve measurement for predicting clinical prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease

Invasive Imaging (IVUS, VH-IVUS, and OCT): How I Implement into My

Evaluation COMBO s Healing Profile The EGO-COMBO Serial OCT Study

PCI for Bifurcation Coronary Lesion

Ischemic heart disease

Defining Plaque Composition by CTA: The Latest Tool to Monitor Therapy?

Vascular disease. Structural evaluation of vascular disease. Goo-Yeong Cho, MD, PhD Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

CPIS So-Yeon Choi, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiology Ajou University School of MedicineSuwon, Korea

Sibin K Zacharias 1, Robert D Safian 1, Ryan D Madder 2, Ivan D Hanson 1, Mark C Pica 1, James L Smith 1, James A Goldstein 1 and Amr E Abbas 1

THE COMPLEX RELATION BETWEEN VULNERABILITY AND ISCHEMIA a paradigm shift

PCI for Chronic Total Occlusions

Protection of side branch is essential in treating bifurcation lesions: overview

Controversies in Coronary Revascularization. Atlanta CCU April 15, 2016

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Management of Angiographically Intermediate Non-Culprit Coronary Artery Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndrome

State of the Art. Advances in Cardiovascular Imaging. ESC Congres Stockholm September 1, 2010 Frank E. Rademakers, MD, PhD, FESC

Subclinical atherosclerosis in CVD: Risk stratification & management Raul Santos, MD

Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)

PCIs on Intermediate Lesions NCDR Cath-PCI Registry

Que nos puede aportar el OCT intracoronario

Transcription:

Gary S. Mintz,, MD IVUS Observations in Acute (vs Chronic) Coronary Artery Disease: Structure vs Function

Important IVUS Observations: Remodeling Originally used (first by Glagov) ) to explain atherosclerosis in the absence of lumen compromise - mostly in reference segments Regardless of the definition, assessing lesion remodeling requires a comparison to the reference segment Positive (outward) remodeling in ACS Negative (constrictive or inward) remodeling in stenosis formation in chronic stable angina

Reference Segments Lesions Positive remodeling Intermediate remodeling Negative remodeling Mintz et al, J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:1479-85 Nishioka et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27:1571-76 76

1) Glagov.. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1371-5 2) Mintz.. Circulation 1997;95:1791-8 3) Nishioka.. JACC 1996;27:1571-6 4) Lim. Circulation. 1997;95:855-9 5) Tauth.. AJC 1997;8:1352-5 6) Kornowski.. AJC 1998; 81:1298-134 134 7) Schwarzacher.. Circulation 1998;98:I-145 145 8) Schoenhagen.. Circulation 2;11:598-63 9) Sabate.. AJC 1999;84:135-4. 4. 1) von Birgelen.. JACC 21;37:1864-7 7 11) Kawagoe.. Circulation 1998;98:I-368 12) Mintz.. JACC 1995;25:1479-85 13) Dangas.. Circulation1999;99:3149-54 14) Weissman.. AJC 1999;84:37-4 4 15) Hong. Am Heart J 2;14:395-41 41 16) Abizaid.. JACC 1999;33:53A 17) Wexberg.. JACC 2;36:186-9 18) Mehran.. Circulation 2;11:64-1 19) Taylor. JACC 1999;34:76-7 2) Nakamura. JACC 21;37:63-9 21) Pethig.. Am Heart J 1998;135:628-33 33 22) Kobashigawa.. J Heart Lung Transplant 2;19:546-5 5 23) Endo. JACC 21;37:7-5 24) Okura. JACC 21 (in press) 25) Nishioka.. AJC 21;87:387-91 26) Gyongyosi. Coron Artery Dis 1999;1:211-9 27) Ward. Atherosclerosis 21;154:179-83 +Rem Intermediate -Rem Plaque burden Plaque burden Reference segment disease (12) Advanced fibrocalcific Early atherosclerosis (1) disease (2,5,9) Soft plaques (9) Chronic stable angina or old MI (2,3,5,14,17,2) Acute coronary syndromes (7,8,1,11,16,2) Hypercholesterolemia (5) High HDL-cholesterol (19) Increased restenosis and CK-MB post-pci (13,17,18,23,24) New stenosis in another location (17) Advanced age (26) Smoking (5,14) Insulin-treated DM (6) Vasospastic angina (15) Transplant atherosclerosis (4,21,22) Proximal disease, eccentric Ostial,, distal disease, lesions surrounded by eccentric lesions surrounded pericardium (9,25) by myocardium (9,25,27)

Remodeling in Acute Coronary Syndromes Proximal reference EEM CSA (mm 2 ) Lumen CSA (mm 2 ) ACS 15.2±5, 5, 2 9.1±3.6 Stable 14.2±5.2 7.9±2.8 p.2.6 6 5 4 ACS Stable P=.1 P&M CSA (mm 2 ) 6.1±2.6 6.2±3.5.9 3 Lesion EEM CSA (mm 2 ) Lumen CSA (mm 2 ) 16.1±6. 2 2.3±1.1 13.±4.8 1.9±.4.4.3 2 1 P&M CSA (mm 2 ) Remodeling Index 13.9±5. 5 1.6±.. 2 11.1±4.8.94±.2.2.5.8 Positive No Negative Remodeling Schoenhagen et al. Circulation 2;11:598-63

Diabetes Modulates Remodeling in ACS and Stable Angina (n=927) Frequency of Positive Remodeling Acute Coronary Syndrome Stable Angina DM 59/183 (32.%) 17/88 (19.6%) No DM 225/469 (48.%) 42/187 (22.3%) Abizaid,, unpublished observations

In Some Patients with Chronic Stable Angina Negative Remodeling Appears to Occur Early During Stenosis Formation 14 intermediate stenoses 274 RCA stenoses, stratified (QCA DS<6%) according to reference disease 6 5 Negative remodeling Intermediate remodeling 5 45 Positive remodeling 4 4 35 3 3 25 2 2 15 1 1 5 Negative Remodeling Intermediate Remodeling Positive Remodeling <2% (n=91) 2-4% (n=91) 4-6% (n=92) Reference plaque burden Hirose M, AJC in press Hong M-K, M JACC in press

244 Patients with Stable Angina and Single Vessel Intervention 5 Positive Pre-PCI Remodeling (n=7) Intermediate Pre-PCI Remodeling (n=11) Negative Pre-PCI Remodeling (n=64) 4 3 p=.24 p=.36 p=.7 2 1 MACE (%) Target Lesion Restenosis (%) New Stenosis Formation (%) Wexberg et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2;36:186-9

Important IVUS Observations: Lesion Morphology Acute Acute coronary syndromes Hypoechoic plaque Eccentric lesions Ruptured plaques Thrombus-containing plaques in ACS Fibrocalcific plaque in chronic stable angina in association with negative remodeling Positive Positive remodeling and unstable lesion morphologies - i.e., ruptured and thrombus-containing plaques - tend to occur together in ACS

Plaque Composition in Acute Coronary Syndromes 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 p=.2 ACS Stable p=ns p=ns p=ns Echolucent Echodense Mixed Calcific Schoenhagen et al. Circulation 2;11:598-63

Comparison of Patients with ACS, no MI within 3 weeks, Single de novo Culprit Lesion Troponin (+) vs Troponin (-) 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 p=.4 Plaque rupture (%) Troponin + (n=4) Troponin - (n=45) p=.3 p=.48 p=.17 Dissection (%) Thrombus (%) Any unstable morphology (%) Fuchs et al. Am J Cardiol 22;89:1111-3

Three Vessel IVUS Imaging in 24 Pts with ACS and Positive Tn 5 ruptured plaques 9 culprit lesion 41 nonculprit lesion 19 pts had at least 1 nonculprit plaque rupture 17 pts had 1 plaque rupture in a second artery 3 pts had plaque ruptures in all 3 arteries Rioufol et al Circulation 22;16:84-88 88 % 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 1 2 3 4 5 # of Ruptured Plaques

3 plaque ruptures in 257 arteries of 254 pts Asymptomatic Stable angina Peri MI USA 46% 11% 11% 32% The frequency of stable angina or no symptoms in patients with plaque rupture suggests that asymptomatic rupture and healing are common and may be one of the mechanisms of progression of CAD Thrombus in 46% more frequent in pts with USA or peri-mi, p=.2 more frequent in arteries with multiple rupture sites, p=.4 Ca ++ in 55%, arc=36±47 located at the base of the rupture in 86% Tear in fibrous cap identified in 59%, at shoulder of plaque in 68% in center of plaque in 32% Multiple rupture sites in 14% of ACS patients Maehara et al J Am Coll Cardiol 22;4:94-1

22 patients with single de novo lesions studied using angioscopy and IVUS showed a relationship between thrombus and remodeling Complex lesions (irregular surface ±thrombus) Simple lesions (smooth surface w/o thrombus) Positive Remodeling (Lesion EEM>1.5 Reference) 8 1 Negative Remodeling (Lesion EEM<.95 Reference) 2 5 Smits et al. Cardiovasc Res 1999;41:458-464 464 p=.35

Culprit Lesion Morphology vs Remodeling in 6 Patients with Unstable Angina 1 Frequency of Plaque Rupture 1 Frequency of Thrombus 9 9 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 Positive Intermediate Remodeling Negative Positive Intermediate Negative Remodeling Gyongyosi et al. Heart 1999;82:68-74

Remodeling vs plaque composition IVUS & histology in 29 patients (17 stable angina, 12 ACS) treated with DCA Remodeling index 1.2 IVUS & OCT in 82 lesions in 5 patients Remodeling index 1.2 1 1.8.8.6.4.2 1 2 1 2 Inflammatory Lipid score cells.6.4.2 Lipid rich* Mixed Fibrous *Remodeling also correlated with quadrants of lipid (p=.1) Uemura et al. ACC 23 Mac Neill et al. ACC 23

Calcium Does Not Increase the Biomechanical Instability of Atherosclerotic Plaques! Stable (n=1) Ruptured (n=1) p Ca ++ CSA (%) 4.1 5.4.4 Lipid CSA (%) 14.1 2.8.3 Calcium Lipid Maximal stress (kpa( kpa) 286 458.38 x=stable x=ruptured kpa 16 x x x x x xx x x x x x x x p=ns x x x 3 % area of calcium Huang. Circulation 21;13:151-6 kpa 16 x x x xx x x x x x x p=.24 x x x x x x x 6 % area of lipid When fibrous plaque was replaced with calcium, stress changed insignificantly (p=.85). In contrast, stress decreased by 26% (p=.2) when lipid was replaced with fibrous plaque.

Multiple studies have shown that EBCT calcium score predicts acute coronary events at 1 year follow-up 7 6 5 4 7 6 5 4 # with no events (n=1155) # with events (n=18) 7 6 5 4 1. MACE (n=1172) Specificity Sensitivity Square Root of Calcium Score 6 3 2 3 2 3 2 1. Death/MI (n=1172) Specificty Specificity 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Square Root of Calcium Score Arad et al. Circulation 1996;93:1951-3 Sensitivity Square Root of Calcium Score 6 Arad et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2;36:1253-6 6

Important IVUS Observations: Calcium If calcium is uncommon in ACS lesions and if calcium does not affect plaque vulnerability and instability, why does the EBCT calcium score predict acute events?

Volumetric IVUS analysis of 19 RCA's with 1 or 2 focal de novo stenoses EEM vol (mm 3 ) Lumen vol (mm 3 ) P&M vol (mm 3 ) Length (mm) Lesion 119 ±111 29 ±3 9 ±86 9.4 ±7.6 Non- Stenotic Segment 459 ±283 228 ±156 231 ±14 33.4 ±13.5 p <.1 <.1 <.1 <.1 72±12% of the plaque volume (range 46-86%) is in nonstenotic segments. Plaque volume l t ith l i Volumetric index of total calcium 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 r=.57, p=.11 25 5 75 1 Total plaque volume (mm 3 ) Tinana et al. Am J Cardiol 22;89:757-6

Proximal 3mm 12mm EEM CSA = 21.mm 2 Lumen CSA = 9.5mm 2 P+M CSA = 11.5mm 2 EEM CSA = 23.5mm 2 Lumen CSA = 5.5mm 2 P+M CSA = 18.mm 2 EEM CSA = 13.7mm 2 Lumen CSA = 9.3mm 2 P+M CSA = 4.4mm 2

1mm 4mm

2mm 6mm

Important IVUS Observations: Lumen Compromise What What separates lesions with asymptomatic plaque rupture from plaque ruptures that cause acute symptoms?

Clinical Follow up in 357 intermediate lesions in 3 pts deferred intervention after IVUS imaging IVUS MLD (mm) 4 3 Death/MI/TLR 35 3 25 TLR 35 3 25 DM no-dm 2 2 15 2 15 1 r=.339 1 2 3 4 QCA MLD (mm) 1 5 2-3 3-4 4-5 5 IVUS MLA (mm 2 ) Independent predictors of death/mi/tlr was IVUS MLA (p=.41) Independent predictors of TLR were DM (p=.493) and IVUS MLA (p=.42) Although the number of patients with death and MI was small (n=6), the only independent predictor was IVUS MLD (p=.498). 1 5 IVUS MLA (mm 2 )

42 Consecutive Pts with Angiography Both Before and After MI Risk of MI 29 patients had a newly 14 occluded artery 12 In 19 pts, the artery 1 previously had a <5% DS 8 In only 1 pts the 6 occlusion was at the 4 site of the most severe 2 stenosis Little et al. Circulation 1988;78:1157-66 18 16 118 Pts in CASS after Baseline Angiography Risk of Anterior MI within 3 years (%) -49 5-69 7-89 9-98 Baseline QCA DS (%) Ellis et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:98-16 16 "Because the aggregate risk of rupture associated with many non-significant lesions (each with an admitedly lower individual risk potential) exceeds that of the fewer significant lesions, an MI will more likely originate from a nonsignificant lesion." Kern and Meier. Circulation 21;13:3142-9

Comparison of Culprit and Non-Culprit Rupture Sites in ACS Patients with Rupture Sites in Non-ACS Patients ACS Culprit Plaque Ruptures (N=35) ACS Non-Culprit Plaque Ruptures (N=2) Non-ACS Plaque Ruptures (N=27) 1.3 7 7 1.2 6 6 1.1 5 5 1.9.8.7 p=.1 4 3 2 p=.1 4 3 2 p=.1.6 1 1.5 Rupture Site Remodeling Index Minimum Lumen Area (mm 2 ) Thrombus (%) Independent predictors of ACS were MLA and thrombus (both p=.1) Fuji et al. Unpublished Observations

Limitations of IVUS Measurement of fibrous cap Histologic studies suggest that the fibrous cap in vulnerable plaques measures <65 microns IVUS resolution is >1 microns Assessment of plaque composition

IVUS Can Measure Fibrous Cap Thickness In Vitro, but NOT In Vivo Hiro et al. Circulation 21;13:126-11 11

Virtual Histology db MHz Fibrous, Fibrofatty, Lipidic-necrotic, Calcium

Predictive Accuracies of Training and Test Datasets Fibrous (n=11) Fibro-Lipidic (n=56) Calcified (n=5) Lipidic-Necrotic (n=7) Training Test Training Test Training Test Training Test FFT^2 9.4 69.6 92.3 81.2 92.8 82.6 9.9 71. Welch 88.9 66.7 92.3 76.8 91.8 86.5 82.6 72.5 AR 9.4 79.7 92.8 81.2 9.9 89.5 92.8 85.5

Ex-Vivo Validation Virtual Histology Fibrous, Fibro-lipidic, Lipidic-necrotic, Calcium

Ex-Vivo Validation Virtual Histology Fibrous, Fibro-lipidic, Lipidic-necrotic, Calcium

What about IVUS compared with other invasive diagnostic modalities? IVUS Structure + Plaque Composition Fibrous Cap Function Safe Validated in vivo Practical Available + IVUS+Virtual Histology + + OCT + + + + Thermography + Palpography + +

Conclusions Almost everything that we know about IVUS and vulnerable plaque has come from extrapolating studies of IVUS in ACS - NOT from prospective correlative studies Culprit lesions in ACS are, in general, characterized by Positive Positive remodeling Hypoechoic,, eccentric, ruptured plaques with evidence of thrombus With With a complex interaction between remodeling and plaque composition and instability in ACS. Positive remodeling Prevents lumen compromise "Paradoxically" may contribute to ACS and to MACE after PCI May May be less common in diabetics with ACS Negative remodeling Contributes to lumen compromise Probably can occur both early and late Calcium is a marker of plaque mass, not a determinant of instability

But... The relationship between ACS/MI, positive remodeling, "vulnerable" le" plaques, and ruptured plaques may not be so simple. Frequency of an MI is related to the severity of the underlying stenosis Not Not all pts with ACS/MI have positive remodeling Not Not all pts with ACS/MI have plaque rupture Not Not all ruptured plaques cause ACS/MI. In some pts plaque rupture re is asymptomatic and may be followed by healing, negative remodeling, calcification, and disease progression. In other patients the development of a thrombus (superimposed on plaque rupture) decreased lumen dimensions and results in ACS/MI While While the concept of using multiple complementary imaging techniques may seem attractive, any clinical approach must be practical and safe.