Advances in Advanced Heart Failure Therapies. Disclosures. Management Algorithm for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock

Similar documents
Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Management of Heart Failure

Mechanical Cardiac Support in Acute Heart Failure. Michael Felker, MD, MHS Associate Professor of Medicine Director of Heart Failure Research

Ventricular Assist Devices for Permanent Therapy: Current Status and Future

เอกราช อร ยะช ยพาณ ชย

The Who, How and When of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies. Disclosures. What is Advanced Heart Failure?

Right Ventricular Failure: Prediction, Prevention and Treatment

Andrew Civitello MD, FACC

Why Children Are Not Small Adults? Treatment of Pediatric Patients Needing Mechanical Circulatory Support

VAD come Destination therapy nell adulto con Scompenso Cardiaco

Surgical Options for Advanced Heart Failure

Novel Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure

Further devices to treat heart failure

Status of Implantable VADs

LVAD Complications, Recovery

Acute Circulatory Support Should We or Shouldn t We?

None. Declaration of conflict of interest

Update on Mechanical Circulatory Support. AATS May 5, 2010 Toronto, ON Canada

Mechanical assist patient selection, device selection, and outcomes

Destination Therapy SO MUCH DATA IN SUCH A SMALL DEVICE. HeartWare HVAD System The ONLY intrapericardial VAD approved for DT.

Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS)

Heart Failure Medical and Surgical Treatment

LVADs as a long term or destination therapy for the advanced heart failure

Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support - What to Use

Ventricular Assist Device: Are Early Interventions Superior? Hamang Patel, MD Section of Cardiomyopathy & Heart Transplantation

Bridge to Heart Transplantation

End Stage Heart Failure - Time to Bring the Hammer Down

Outpatient Treatment of MCS Patient. F. Bennett Pearce, MD Professor of Pediatrics Med Director Heart Transplant COA

Integrating Innovative Technologies into the Care of Cardiac Patients

Strengthening Your VAD Program

Ramani GV et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:180-95

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs): Overview and Future Directions

Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?

AllinaHealthSystem 1

New Trends and Indications for LVADs

A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device. Final Report of the MOMENTUM 3 Trial

Circulatory Support: From IABP to LVAD

WHAT S NEW IN HEART FAILURE

Management of Acute Shock and Right Ventricular Failure

Diagnosis of Device Thrombosis

Do we really need an Artificial Heart? No!! John V. Conte, MD, Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Modern Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD) : An Intro, Complications, and Emergencies

Bridging With Percutaneous Devices: Tandem Heart and Impella

LIVING A MORE ACTIVE LIFE. with the HeartMate 3 LVAD for the treatment of advanced heart failure RON. Recipient

Device Therapy for Heart Failure

The Elderly End of Life

Christopher M. O Connor, MD, FACC CEO and Executive Director, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute Professor of Medicine (adj.) Duke University Editor

Tri-City Cardiology Consultants FIFTH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM

Management of Cardiogenic Shock. Dr Stephen Pettit, Consultant Cardiologist

Lessons learned from ENDURANCE, ROADMAP, MedaMACS, and how to go forward?

ECMO as a Bridge to Heart Transplant in the Era of LVAD s.

Is it time to consider a HEARTMATE LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE (LVAD)?

Low cardiac output & Mechanical Support นายแพทย อรรถภ ม ส ศ ภอรรถ ศ ลยศาสตร ห วใจและทรวงอก โรงพยาบาล ราชว ถ

New ventricular assist devices. FW Mohr Clinical seminar: Devices for severe heart failure ESC congress Stockholm 2010

Implantable Ventricular Assist Devices and Total Artificial Hearts

HEARTMATE 3 LVAD WITH FULL MAGLEV FLOW TECHNOLOGY THEIR FUTURE STARTS WITH YOU

What s new in heart failure management? Yonsei Cardiovascular Center Yonsei University College of Medicine

VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES AND TOTAL ARTIFICIAL HEARTS

Implantable Ventricular Assist Devices and Total Artificial Hearts. Policy Specific Section: June 13, 1997 March 29, 2013

Ted Feldman, M.D., MSCAI FACC FESC

Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) Long Term Outcomes

Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS): What Every Pharmacist Needs to Know!

Ventricular Assist Devices and Total Artificial Hearts

Surgical Options for Temporary MCS

CHANGING THE WAY HEART FAILURE IS TREATED. VAD Therapy

Understanding the Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device

How to mend a broken heart: transplantation or LVAD?

Counterpulsation. John N. Nanas, MD, PhD. Professor and Head, 3 rd Cardiology Dept, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Predicting Outcomes in LVAD Recipients

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES

HEARTMATE 3 LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM

Establishing a New Path Forward for Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis THE PARTNER TRIAL CLINICAL RESULTS

Overview of MCS in Bruce B Reid, MD Surgical Director Artificial Heart Program/Heart Transplantation

Total Artificial Hearts and Implantable Ventricular Assist Devices

Implantable Ventricular Assist Devices and Total Artificial Hearts

I have nothing to disclose.

Mechanical Support in the Failing Fontan-Kreutzer

Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation- Supportive Data for a Role in Cardiogenic Shock ( Be Still My Friend )

HEARTMATE II LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM. HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device

Ventricular Assisting Devices in the Cathlab. Unrestricted

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Take-home Messages from Recent Heart Failure Trials: Heart Rate as a Target

Cardiac Devices CRT,ICD: Who is and is not a Candidate? Who Decides

When to implant VAD in patients with heart transplantation indication. Aldo Cannata Dept of Cardiac Surgery Niguarda Ca Granda Hospital Milano

Assist Devices in STEMI- Intra-aortic Balloon Pump

Innovative ECMO Configurations in Adults

Left ventricular assist devices current state and perspectives

Name of Policy: Ventricular Assist Devices and Total Artificial Hearts

Translating Device and Mechanical Support Guidelines to ACHD Research. Timothy M. Maul, CCP, PhD Perfusionist Sr. Research Scientist

Total Artificial Hearts and Implantable Ventricular Assist Devices

HFA- ESC criteria for Advanced HF and US Requirements for Destination Therapy

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement: Where is the Latest Randomized Evidence Taking US Mitral-Fr, COAPT

Cath Lab Essentials : LV Assist Devices for Hemodynamic Support (IABP, Impella, Tandem Heart, ECMO)

The Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock Knowledge Gaps & Opportunities


Measuring the risk in valve patients Lessons learnt from the TAVI story? Bernard Iung Bichat Hospital, Paris, France

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock The Cardiologist s view ACCA Masterclass 2017

The Interface of Cardiology and Palliative Medicine

2018 Update on Heart Failure Management. Where we are today.


Transcription:

Advances in Advanced Heart Failure Therapies 9 th Annual Dartmouth Conference on Advances in Heart Failure Therapies Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center May 20, 2013 Joseph G. Rogers, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine Senior Vice Chief for Clinical Affairs, Division of Cardiology Medical Director, Cardiac Transplant and Mechanical Circulatory Support Program Duke University Disclosures Consultant: Thoratec Corporation Principal nvestigator, HeartWare ENDURANCE trial Management Algorithm for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock Rogers JG, Milano CA, The role for mechanical support in cardiogenic shock, AHA Publication, 2009

The Problem of Acute Cardiogenic Shock ABP SHOCK Trial On the basis of the ABP-Shock trial, we must move forward with the understanding that a cardiovascular condition with a 40% mortality at 30- days is unacceptable. New Eng J Med 2012;367:1349-50 New Engl J Med 2012;367:1287-96 Novel Mechanical Approaches to Treat Acute Cardiogenic Shock Need controlled clinical trials of novel mechanical circulatory assist devices for acute heart failure TandemHeart in Cardiogenic Shock: TH Experience 118 patients with refractory cardiogenic shock Nearly 50% had just received or were receiving CPR Mean support duration = 5.8 days Am Heart J 2006;152:469 Artificial Organs 2006;30: 523-8 J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:688-96

Mechanical Right Heart Support Two limbs in trial: 1) Post M RV failure; 2) Post heart surgery The Stage D Heart Failure Patient 5% of the heart failure population ntolerable symptoms Frequent hospitalizations Limited therapeutic options Percent Survival 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 Months Post Enrollment N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1435-43 Advanced Heart Failure Decision Making Advanced HF Symptoms Severe LV Dysfunction Standard Therapies Utilized Pt wishes to proceed Viable candidate Yes Management of Co-morbidities Tailored Medical Therapy/PAC Suitable improvement No Palliative Care Hospice Yes Continue No Continuous infusion inotropes LVAD Transplant

mpact of notropes on Survival Mortality (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 3 6 9 12 Mo on notropic Therapy Placebo Randomized V notropes Uncontrolled V notrope Oral Milrinone Class V REMATCH notrope Dependent Oregon Series Circulation 2003; 108:492-97 NUMBER OF HEART TRANSPLANTS BY YEAR AND LOCATON J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Oct; 31(10): 1045-1095 ADULT HEART TRANSPLANTS Patients Bridged with Mechanical Circulatory Support* (Transplants: January 2000 December 2010) * LVAD, RVAD, TAH J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Oct; 31(10): 1045-1095

HEART TRANSPLANTS Kaplan-Meier Survival (Transplants: January 1982 - June 2010) N = 96,273 N at risk at 25 years = 112 J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Oct; 31(10): 1045-1095 ADULT HEART RECPENTS Functional Status of Surviving Recipients (Follow-ups: January 2000 June 2011) J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Oct; 31(10): 1045-1095 VAD mplantation in the US J Heart Lung Transplant 2013;32:141-56

P < 0.001 log-rank test Post-Trial (N=1496) Trial (N=486) 85% 76% At Risk: 281 133 215 95 Early trial = 2.0 ± 1.6 years (longest: 5.5 years) Mid trial = 1.5 ± 1.0 years (longest: 3.4 years) 74 ± 3% 68 ± 4% 188 82 Mid trial (N=281) Early trial (N=133) 167 69 64 ± 3% 58 ± 4% 94 62 Mechanically Assisted Circulation: Contemporary Devices Axial Flow Pump Centrifugal Flow Pump Continuous Flow Pumps Flow Characteristics: continuous Valves: no Operating Mode: fixed speed Mechanically Assisted Circulation: Contemporary Devices and Outcomes Percent Survival 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Bridge to Transplant 30 20 10 0 0 3 6 9 12 Months Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:1406-13 6 MN WALK V Bridge to Transplant V Circulation 2012;125:3191-3200 NYHA CLASS 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Destination Therapy P(log-rank) = 0.134 P(adjusted for BSA) = 0.162 Average Support Duration 0 6 12 18 24 Time (Months) Circ Heart Failure 2012;5:241-8 KCCQ J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 1826-34 Ongoing trials using MCS in non-inotrope dependent, ambulatory heart failure REVVE-T ROADMAP Sponsor NH, Thoratec Thoratec Design Randomized Non-randomized N 100 200 Follow-up Duration (mo) 24 24 Current VAD indication No Yes 1 0 Endpoint Survival free from disabling stroke and increased 6MWD 75 m at 24 months Survival with increased 6MWD 75 m at 12 months LVEF 0.35 0.25 NYHA Class b-v 6 min Walk 350 meters <300 meters

nnovations in Mechanical Circulatory Support Focus on enhanced durability, biocompatibility, energy efficiency and less invasive implant techniques New Devices Totally mplantable VADS for Partial Support Circulite Synergy Surgical or percutaneous implant Partial cardiac assist Flow 2-3 l/min Modeling suggests reduction of LVEDP 7-10 mm Hg 8-12 hours of untethered support Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;39:693-8 Proximal Aortic Counterpulsation Curr Heart Fail Report 2010;7:27-34

Total Artificial Heart Bridge to Transplant vs Medical Therapy New Engl J Med 2004;351:859-867 Strategies for BiVentricular Support 30-day survival 82% Circulation 2011; 124 (suppl1):s179-s186 Myocardial Functional Recovery on a Pulsatile Device: The Harefield Experience Adjunctive Clenbuterol Adjunctive Cell Therapy Allogeneic Stem Cells N Engl J Med 2006;355:1873-84

16 patients with ischemic cmy, LVEF < 0.40 1 million autologous cardiac stem cells administered C Lancet 2011; 378:1847-57 Tissue Re-Engineering Taylor DA Texas Heart nst J 2009 36:148-9

90 80 80 Prefers comfort care Prefer DNR Pain Confusion Dyspnea 70 % Patients 60 40 % Patients 60 50 40 30 20 20 10 0 6 Mo- 3 Mo 3 Mo- 1 Mo 1 Mo- 3 Days 3 Days-Death 0 6 Mo-3 Mo 3 Mo-1 Mo 1 Mo-3 Days J Am Geriatr Soc 48:S101 Summary and Conclusions Advanced heart failure is associated with high residual morbidity and mortality despite contemporary medical and electrical therapies Acute cardiogenic shock requires a more innovative and evidencebased approach Transplant remain the gold standard (MCS takes bronze) New devices will be smaller, energy efficient and will be implanted with less invasive techniques The totally implantable systems may significantly reduce morbidty and improve quality of life Clinical trials for biventricular support are needed Stem cells remain the holy grail of heart failure therapy t is imperative that we understand how to utilize palliative care and hospice in heart failure