HEARING DOJ DOJ DOJ DOJ Modified Parity case. Appeal allowed. DOJ DOJ

Similar documents
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Tuesday, this the 11 th day of December 2018

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI LIST OF BUSINESS Dated: COURT NO.1 (Ground Floor)

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus J U D G E M E N T

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI LIST OF BUSINESS Dated: COURT NO.1 (Ground Floor)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI LIST OF BUSINESS Dated: COURT NO.1 (Ground Floor)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI LIST OF BUSINESS Dated: COURT NO.1 (Ground Floor)

HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. The Roster of Sitting of Hon ble Judges of Delhi High Court effective from 10

HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Pronounced on: CRL.L.P. 458/2015 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. M.A. No.706 of 2013 And M.A. No.557 of 2013 In Original Application No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDCITON CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2015

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI LIST OF BUSINESS Dated: COURT NO.1 (Ground Floor)

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Board of Education Upper Marlboro, Maryland Policy No. BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICY

Search Result - College Detail(s)

U;k;ky; eq[; vk;qdr fu% kdrtu

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. No. OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 565 OF 2012 VERSUS

BEFORE THE CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AT RAIPUR

1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI LIST OF BUSINESS Dated: COURT NO.1 (Ground Floor)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI LIST OF BUSINESS Dated: COURT NO.1 (Ground Floor) Petitioners) Respondents)

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI LIST OF BUSINESS Dated: COURT NO.1 (Ground Floor)

Graduate Student Academic Grievance Hearing Procedures. For the College of Education

THIS BENCH WILL NOT ASSEMBLE DUE TO LACK OF CORAM. ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI LIST OF BUSINESS Dated:

Action Request Transmittal

Guidance for Witnesses

DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE RULE

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. COURT No. 1 (Ground Floor)

What is civil commitment? Involuntary treatment of individuals who are dangerous or unable to meet their basic needs due to a mental illness.

Exhibit 2 RFQ Engagement Letter

Civil Commitments. Presented by Magistrate Crystal Burnett

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. COURT No. 1 (Ground Floor)

Schools Hearings & Appeals Procedure

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW APPEALS BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS

LEGAL PROCESS OUTSOURCING

IN THE MATTER OF THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS ACT, R.S.A. 2000, c.h-7;

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. COURT No. 1 (Ground Floor)

ARMED. President. Manglik) Court No. Secretary. Treasurer. Executivee Members. (Rajiv Hony. Singh. Vijendra. Ramesh

Purpose: Policy: The Fair Hearing Plan is not applicable to mid-level providers. Grounds for a Hearing

Hearings. Robert Walton. 16 th October 2017

State Statutes Requiring the Provision of Sign Language 12/2008 Interpreters to Parties to Civil Proceedings

Review of National Disability Insurance Scheme Decisions Practice Direction

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

DETAIL OF HIGH COURT CASES IN RESPECT OF TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, H.P. SHIMLA 4 AS ON

METROLINX ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS RULES OF PRACTICE

ARMED HIGH TEA. President. It is on. Secretary. office. demitting. Treasurer. invited. Executivee Members. Abhishek. Ramesh. Copy to: - Principal

Section 8 Administrative Plan (revised January 2000) Chapter 22 # page 1

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kenney, 110 Ohio St.3d 38, 2006-Ohio-3458.]

DATE: March 28, 2001 M E M O R A N D U M. Directors of Special Education. Gordon M. Riffel Deputy Superintendent Special Education Unit

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) MFA 54 of 2010

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. COURT No. 1 (Ground Floor)

Proposed Revisions to the Procedure for Adjusting Grievances

Section 32: BIMM Institute Student Disciplinary Procedure

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

TUCSON CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COURT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

NOTICE OF APPEAL OR PETITION

CHAPTER : 8. Judicial Approach. 8.0 Insurance Cover for HIV positive Delhi High Court directed IRDA to

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

MEMBER GRIEVANCES AND APPEALS PROCEDURES

Fitness to Stand Trial

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, WASHINGTON STATE CAUSE NO SEA

Regulation of the Chancellor

Family Tariff. General Tariff Information. Scope of the family referral. Extended Services

After approval of DG(AIR) and Prasar Bharati the proposal will be sent to Ministry of Information & Broadcasting for their approval.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,298 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI LIST OF BUSINESS Dated: COURT NO.2 (First Floor)

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRPORT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RULES OF PROCEDURE

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT HEARINGS BEFORE HEARING EXAMINER

Corporate Policies. Corporate Billing and Collection Policy Section:

A resident's salary will continue, during the time they are exercising the Grievance Procedure rights, by requesting and proceeding with a hearing.

State of Connecticut Department of Education Division of Teaching and Learning Programs and Services Bureau of Special Education

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D56435 L/hu

APPENDIX B TAP 31 RESOLUTION PROCESS

Attachment 5 2. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT

Case 1:09-cv WWC -MCC Document 607 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

if accepted, FINRA will not

Preliminary Statement. 1. In this Article 78 proceeding, Petitioner seeks an order to compel Respondents to open an

792 April 19, 2017 No. 169 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Rules of Procedure for Screening and Hearing Meetings

Section 504 Grievance Procedures

Parent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement

Non-Executive Member Disciplinary Review Process

TENANT'S GUIDE. City of Oakland Rent Adjustment Program

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. COURT No. 1 (Ground Floor)

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Grievance Procedure of the Memphis Housing Authority

LEWIS COUNTY COURT DRUG COURT

CHAPTER 2: PUBLIC BENEFITS

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. APPEAL OF LAURENCE M. KELLY, Ed.D (New Hampshire Board of Mental Health Practice)

A.Sathasivam. Special Invitee- DAE DC

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. COURT No. 1 (Ground Floor)

[Cite as Allen Cty. Bar Assn. v. Brown, 124 Ohio St.3d 530, 2010-Ohio-580.]

The purpose of this rule is to clarify the special practice authorities addressed in , C.R.S.

Long-Term Suspensions and Procedural Due Process

The Clean Environment Commission. Public Participation in the Environmental Review Process

Report from the Department of Justice June 15, 2018

State Office of Administrative Hearings '' Cathleen Parsley )> Chief Administrative Law Judge. April II, 2011

Castlemilk Law and Money Advice Centre. Annual Report 2018

Transcription:

Ite m STATUS OF THE CASES OF PRE 2006 PENSIONERSS IN VARIOUS COURTS : AS ON 01.09.2012 COMPILED BY M. L. KANAUJIA, IRSSE / Chief Communication Engineer, N.E. Railway, (Rtd.) NEXT HEARD BY DATE PETITION NO. LEAD PETITIONER FIXED & YEAR FOR REMARKS IN BRIEF HEARING I OA 3079/2009 LR Khatana s29 2 OA 306/2010 D L Vohra s29 3 OA 507/2010 PPS Gambhir s29 4 OA 655/2010 s29 pen.association 5 CAT Hydrabad OA 2413/2009 AJ Gurushanker 6 AFT-PB Delhi OA 24/2010 Lt.Com.AvtarSingh 7 AFT-PB Delhi OA 270/2010 Sq.Ldr. V K Jain 8 AFT-PB Delhi OA 139/2009 Lt.Col.PK Kapur 9 OA 277/2010 Romesh Chand 10 OA 312/2010 OP Singh 11 OA 313/2010 MS Minhas 09.09.11 Full parity case. Appeal disallowed. 14.09.2010 14.09.2010 30.06.10 12 OA 314/2010 YS Nijjar 13 OA 325/2010 Dildar Singh Sahi

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 OA 326/2010 OA 327/2010 OA 445/2010 OA 476/2010 OA 257/2010 OA 409/2010 OA 410/2010 OA 521/2010 OA 522/2010 OA 346/2010 OA 728/2010 OA 100/2010 Gurlochan Singh Gurmeet Singh Balwant Singh Karam Chand Jagdish Chandar N N Sud HS Tonque GS Kang SS Matharu SPS Vains M.Gen. 26 CAT Patna OA 284/2009 MMP Sinha 27 OA 1732 / 2010 Ram Murti Raina 28 CAT Mumbai OA 780/2009 + 8 Dr. KR Munim 29 CAT Ernakulam OA 843/2010 S29 and s26 S.Parmasivan Pillai & Ors. 04.03.2010 28.05.2010 25.05.2010 22.02.2011 24.11.2011 Full Parity case. Appeal Disallowed. Prayer for reconsideration allowed but UOI has done nothing in the matter. Full Parity case. Appeals Disallowed. This prayer was for modified parity and for counting of special pay for pension allowed under DRDO letter dt. 10.10.2008. Appeal allowed to refix pension in 3 months (1) As per OM dt 29.08.08 exactly as pronounced by CAT-PB in case of OA 655 of

30 AFT-PB/Delhi 31 CAT-PB/Delhi OAs 106/2009,76/ 2011 and 24/2011 Contempt No.158 of 2012 32 CAT Hydrabad OA 568/2010 33 CAT Hydrabad 0A931/2010 Clubbed With OA 568/2010 34 AFT-PB Delhi OA 312 of 2010 35 36 OA 937/2010 OA 2101/2010 Wg.Comm. V S Tomar & Ors. Vs. UOl S29 Pensioners Association Vs. UOI & Ors s29 pensioners Dr. Kotra & Ors. s26 Pensioners. Sub.Lt. Ram Singh Vs UOl & Ors. (Pl.see item 6,7 and 56) s30 pensioners s30 CG Pensioners s30 07.12.2011 30.05.2012 30.12.2011 30.12.2011 02.01.2012 06.03.2012 06.03.2012 2010 (2) Also to count special pay allowed under DRDO letter dt. 10.10.2008, to three of the ten petitioners, namely,s. Paramasivan Pillai. A.K.Prakash and Kalaga Sriharikumari. Petition is allowed in part and para 5 of Order dt.11.11.2008 (pension be in no case less than 50% of Minimum of the pay band plus grade pay corresponding to pay scale from which pensioner had retired I discharged, including MSP and X group pay where applicable) struck down being discriminatory and violative of Article 14. This Contempt Petition is against Govt. which has failed to comply the orders of the CAT-PB given in Judgment in case of OA 0655/2010.(see item 4 above). It came up for hearing on 2.03.2012,13.03.12 and 28.03.12. On request from Pensioners Advocate, further proceedings have been postponed till 09.05.12. Further extended to 30.5.12. In view of case in DHC (see item 61) case dropped by the CAT/PB. Appeal allowed to refix pension in 3 months as per OM dt 29.08.08 exactly as pronounced by CAT-PB in case of OA 655 of 2010. Appeal allowed to refix pension in 3 months as per OM dt 29.08.08 exactly as pronounced by CAT-PB in case of OA 655 of 2010. Govt. has filed Civil Appeal No. 8875 & 8876 in Hon.ble Supreme Court against the Judgment of AFT-PB in OA No. 270 and 24 (see item 6,7 and 56). This case being of similar nature, AFT-PB has therefore, adjourned the case sine-die, till the Judgment of hon.ble Supreme Court, becomes available Judgment has come on 6.3.12. s30 full parity case has been dismissed. S29 modified parity case has been held valid based on Judgment dated 1.11.11 in OA 655. Judgment has come on 6.3.12. s30 full parity case has been dismissed. S29 modified parity case has been held valid based on Judgment dated 1.11.11 in OA 655.

37 AFT-PB Delhi OA 408 of 2010 38 39 OA 201/2010 OA 2087/2009 40 AFT-PB Delhi OA 126 of 2011 41 AFT-PB Delhi OA 289 of 2011 42 43 44 OA 1165 / 2011 OA 2165 / 2011 Wg.Comm. AK Agarwal Vs UOl M L Gulati s29 Vs UOI Ran Vir Singh s30 Wg.Comm.KG Rao Vs UOl Lt.Col.BGV Kumar Vs UOl Pratap Narain & Ors Vs. MOP/flOP KR Srinivasan & Ors Vs. MOP/flOP 29.02.2012 29.2.2012 17.12.2012 17.12.2012 OA 247 of 2012 17 Petitioners 17.12.2012 45 Lucknow HC Ser.Ben.203/2010 s29 UP Officers 46 Delhi HC WP(C)3359/ 2010 47 Pun. & Har. HC CWP19641/2009 48 Pun. & Har. HC CWP19642/ 2009 s29,s26 Ex.ParaMil. RK Agarwal (s29) Rtd.CEEs and XENs Not listed after 1.5.12 Not listed after 16.2.12. The Court ordered on 20.3.12 that let the decision of HSC in case of SLP against AFT judgment in OA 106 of 2009 be awaited. Upon hearing of OA 126, 289 and 408 on 16.8.12, AFT/PB has reserved the Judgment. Full Bench Court ordered on 29.02.12 to grant relief within 3 months as given in case of OA 655 Judgment dt. 1.11.11. Full Bench Court ordered on 29.02.12 to grant relief within 3 months as given in case of OA 655 Judgment dt. 1.11.11. For equality with post 2006, FB Court ordered to refer the case to Division Bench. At the request of learned proxy counsel for the petitioner, case is adjourned, at the joint request of parties. Upon hearing of OA 126, 289 and 408 on 16.8.12, AFT/PB has reserved the Judgment. At the request of learned proxy counsel for the petitioner, case is adjourned. At the joint request of parties, listed on 16th August 2012. Upon hearing of OA 126, 289 and 408 on 16.8.12, AFT/PB has reserved the Judgment. Parity for 20 years service. Govt. submitted its Counter on 11.07.12. Parity for 20 years service. Govt. submitted its Counter on 11.07.12. Parity for 20 years service. Govt. submitted its Counter on 11.07.12. Modified parity case. UOI filed Additional Counter Affidavit on 10.4.2012. Heard on 1.5.12 and ordered Shri Satya Narain Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner is on sanctioned leave. The case is adjourned. List again. Modified parity case. Last heard on 16.02.2012. 18.10.12 Petitioners Rejoinder not yet submitted. Satish Bhalla (s29) 18.10.12 Modified parity case. Last listed on 17.1..12..

49 Pun. & Har. HC CWP3452/ 2010 0 P Kapur (s29) 18.10.12 Modified parity case. Last listed on 2.3.12. 50 Pun. & Har. HC CWP12638/2010 M L Kansal (s29) 18.10.12 Modified parity case. Last listed on 24.2.12. 51 Pun. & Har. HC CWP20725/2010 RK Sehgal (s29) 18.10.12 Modified parity case. Last listed on 24.2.12. 52 Pun. & Har. HC CWP20726/2010 R K Bali (s29) 18.10.12 Modified parity case. Last listed on 24.2.12. 53 Pun. & Har. HC CWP20727/2010 B K Jain (s29) 18.10.12 Modified parity case. Last listed on 24.2.12. 54 Pun. & Har. HC CWP20753/2010 CK Gupta (s29) 18.10.12 Modified parity case. Last listed on 24.2.12. 55 HC Patna CWJC1O757/2010 MMP Sinha, s30 Pending 56 Supreme Court 57 Supreme Court Contempt Petition (Civil) 64/2009 Civil Appeal 2966 / 2011 SPS Vains, Major General & Ors. U0I Vs SPS Vains Mj. General & Ors 21.09.12 21.09.12 Full parity disallowed by CAT Patna. Shri Sinha has appealed in HC/Patna. Last heard on 03.04.2012 but adjourned to 25.06.12. Modified Parity case. This case is connected to Civil Appeal 2966/2011. Modified Parity case. This case is connected to Contempt Petition (Civil) 64/2009. 58 Supreme Court T.P.(C) No.56/2007 (Review Petition) U0I & Ors. Vs NK Nair & Ors. 04.09.2012 Hon.ble Supreme Court allowed appeal for grant of Rank Pay to be added to fix pension w.e.f. 1.1.1986 with 6 % interest. U0I submitted Review Petition citing financial constraints to implement HSC Judgment which is being heard now. 59 Supreme Court 60 Supreme Court Civil Appeal 8875-8876 of 2011. Civil Appeal 5367-5368 OF 2005 U0I & Ors.Vs. Vinod Kumar Jain & Ors (Avtar Singh) Principal Sec.(F & P), Govt. of Andhra Pradesh Vs. A.P. Pensioners Samaj. 14.9.2012 Pending This relates to item 6 & 7 above. U0I has gone in appeal with prayer for stay and condonation of delay. Respondents Rejoinder is now submitted. Couldnot be heard on 6.7.12. Three Judge Bench Matter. There are no further orders of listing.

61 Delhi HC WPC 1535 of 2012 UOI Vs CG SAG s29 Pensioners Association 29.11.2012 This petition has been filed by UOI in appeal and grant of stay against CAT-PB Judgment dated 1.11.11 in case of OA 655 of 2010 and three other OAs. The hearing took place on 4.5.12. 7.5.12 and 17.7.12.So far, following orders have been passed as available on the DHC Website : (1) This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 01.11.2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No. 655/2010 and in other OAs. We feel that it would be appropriate that the petitioner files separate writ petitions in respect of each of the OAs which were filed before the Tribunal. The present writ petition shall be considered as the writ petition in respect of OA No. 655/2010. The respondent-caveators are represented in the Court. We are issuing formal notice in this matter. They accept notice. The caveat stands discharged. The learned counsel for the respondents state that there would be no necessity to file a counter-affidavit and they would be relying on the pleadings before the Tribunal. List for disposal on 04.05.2012. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents state that they shall not be pressing their contempt application before the Tribunal till the next date of hearing. (2) An adjournment slip has been filed on behalf of the respondent. Renotify on 29.11.2012.