Increased Early Rejection Rate after Conversion from Tacrolimus in Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation

Similar documents
Controversies in Renal Transplantation. The Controversial Questions. Patrick M. Klem, PharmD, BCPS University of Colorado Hospital

BK virus infection in renal transplant recipients: single centre experience. Dr Wong Lok Yan Ivy

Rejection after simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation

Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Trial of Antibody Induction Therapy in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

NAPRTCS Annual Transplant Report

SELECTED ABSTRACTS. All (n) % 3-year GS 88% 82% 86% 85% 88% 80% % 3-year DC-GS 95% 87% 94% 89% 96% 80%

Serum samples from recipients were obtained within 48 hours before transplantation. Pre-transplant

Efficacy and Safety of Thymoglobulin and Basiliximab in Kidney Transplant Patients at High Risk for Acute Rejection and Delayed Graft Function

NAPRTCS Annual Transplant Report

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin microemulsion in primary SPK transplantation: 3-year results of the Euro-SPK 001 trial

Intruduction PSI MODE OF ACTION AND PHARMACOKINETICS

Steroid Minimization: Great Idea or Silly Move?

Emerging Drug List EVEROLIMUS

Literature Review: Transplantation July 2010-June 2011

Literature Review Transplantation

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Date: 23 June Context and policy issues:

OUT OF DATE. Choice of calcineurin inhibitors in adult renal transplantation: Effects on transplant outcomes

Long-term prognosis of BK virus-associated nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients

Post Transplant Immunosuppression: Consideration for Primary Care. Sameh Abul-Ezz, M.D., Dr.P.H.

Considering the early proactive switch from a CNI to an mtor-inhibitor (Case: Male, age 34) Josep M. Campistol

Overview of New Approaches to Immunosuppression in Renal Transplantation

Organ rejection is one of the serious

Immunosuppression: evolution in practice and trends,

Calcineurin inhibitors in HLA-identical living related donor kidney transplantation

For Immediate Release Contacts: Jenny Keeney Astellas US LLC (847)

Pharmacology notes Interleukin-2 receptor-blocking monoclonal antibodies: evaluation of 2 new agents

Pancreas and Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation By: Kay R. Brown, CLCP

An Evidence-Based Analysis of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Alone

NAPRTCS Annual Report

NAPRTCS Annual Report

Post-Transplant Monitoring for the Development of Anti-Donor HLA Antibodies

PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION WAS first described

Victims of success: Do we still need clinical trials? Robert S. Gaston, MD CTI Clinical Trials and Consulting University of Alabama at Birmingham

Diltiazem use in tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients Kothari J, Nash M, Zaltzman J, Prasad G V R

TRANSPLANTATION IN DIABETIC PATIENTS. A.Tarik Kizilisik, MD, MSc, FACS, FICS Director & Primary Transplant Surgeon Lutheran Transplant Center

SINCE the introduction of Imuran and

BK Virus (BKV) Management Guideline: July 2017

European Risk Management Plan. Measures impairment. Retreatment after Discontinuation

Recognition and Treatment of Chronic Allograft Dysfunction

Chronic Kidney Disease & Transplantation. Paediatrics : 2004 FRACP

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Serum Cholesterol Changes in Long-Term Survivors of Liver Transplantation: A Comparison Between Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus Therapy

Pancreas after Kidney Transplants in Posturemic Patients with Type I Diabetes Mellitus

Induction Immunosuppression With Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin in Pediatric Liver Transplantation

Reduced graft function (with or without dialysis) vs immediate graft function a comparison of long-term renal allograft survival

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 30 November 2011

Solid Organ Transplantation 1. Chapter 55. Solid Organ Transplant, Self-Assessment Questions

Lupus and Your Kidneys. Michael P. Madaio, MD Professor of Medicine Chairman of Medicine Medical College of Georgia Augusta, Georgia

Case Report Beneficial Effect of Conversion to Belatacept in Kidney-Transplant Patients with a Low Glomerular-Filtration Rate

Targeted Adverse Event (ADV)

Mycophenolate mofetil in low-risk renal transplantation in patients receiving no cyclosporine: a single-centre experience

Alemtuzumab Induction in Non-Hepatitis C Positive Liver Transplant Recipients

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stages. CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE Treatment Options. Incident counts & adjusted rates, by primary diagnosis Figure 2.

REACH Risk Evaluation to Achieve Cardiovascular Health

North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) 2005 Annual Report. Renal Transplantation. Chronic Renal Insufficiency

Immunosuppressants. Assistant Prof. Dr. Najlaa Saadi PhD Pharmacology Faculty of Pharmacy University of Philadelphia

What is the Best Induction Immunosuppression Regimen in Kidney Transplantation? Richard Borrows: Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham

Renal Transplant. Tony Chacon. Program Head BCIT Nephrology Nursing Program.

NAPRTCS Annual Report

Chapter 4 Section Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney (SPK), Pancreas-After-Kidney (PAK), And Pancreas-Transplant-Alone (PTA)

Chapter 4 Section 24.7

2017 CST-Astellas Canadian Transplant Fellows Symposium. Management of Renal Dysfunction in Extra Renal Transplants

Use of mycophenolate mofetil in steroid-dependent and -resistant nephrotic syndrome

Pancreas After Islet Transplantation: A First Report of the International Pancreas Transplant Registry

Immunosuppression is now manageable in the

Transplant Overview. Timothy J. Schroeder President and CEO CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services November 10, 2005

Cyclosporine Lymphocyte Maximum Level Monitoring in De Novo Kidney Transplant Patients: A Prospective Study

Desensitization in Kidney Transplant. James Cooper, MD Assistant Professor, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Program, Renal Division, UC Denver

Transplantation in Australia and New Zealand

Vol. 29, pp.585 ~ 589, ml. 1.6 mg/dl 1 MRSA. Table 1 MRI

American Journal of Transplantation 2009; 9 (Suppl 3): S1 S157 Wiley Periodicals Inc.

Trends in immune function assay (ImmuKnow; Cylexä) results in the first year post-transplant and relationship to BK virus infection

Lothar Bernd Zimmerhackl

Chapter 6: Transplantation

Clinical decisions regarding immunosuppressive

KDOQI US Commentary on the 2009 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients

ABO. ABO ABO ABO ABO ABO ABO ABO ABO. Key words ABO. Alexandre ABO ABO. double filtration plasmapheresis, DFPP. antibody-mediated rejection, AMR

Transplantation: Year in Review

Belatacept: An Update of Ongoing Clinical Trials

Re: Final Appraisal Determination - Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplant in adults (review of technology appraisal guidance 85)

Clinical Outcomes After Conversion From Brand-Name Tacrolimus (Prograf) to a Generic Formulation In Renal Transplant Recipients

Long-term efficacy and safety of conversion to tacrolimus in heart. transplant recipients with ongoing or recurrent acute cellular.

This study is currently recruiting participants.

1266 TRANSPLANTATION. Vol. 75, No. 8

Understanding Myositis Medications

Intravenous immunoglobulin in BK virus nephropathy

Myfortic Transplant Coordinator Survey: Defining the perceptions of generic mycophenolate mofetil

Review Article The Role of mtor Inhibitors in Liver Transplantation: Reviewing the Evidence

James E. Cooper, M.D. Assistant Professor, University of Colorado at Denver Division of Renal Disease and Hypertension, Kidney and PancreasTransplant

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Recurrent Diseases in the Transplant. Simin Goral MD University of Pennsylvania Medical Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Clinical Study Renal Transplantation in Hepatitis C Positive Patients: ASingleCentreExperience

Pancreas Transplantation. Sonia Clarke-Swaby Recipient Kidney/pancreas Transplant Co-ordinator Guy s Hospital

Supporting a Pediatric Investigational Plan for Everolimus - Defining the extrapolation plan

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 11 October 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta482

Long-term cardiovascular risk in transplantation insights from the use of everolimus in heart transplantation

The New England Journal of Medicine

Ryszard Grenda: Steroid-Free Pediatric Transplantation. Early Steroid Withdrawal in Pediatric Renal Transplantation

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in elderly patients over 60 years of age

Transcription:

Increased Early Rejection Rate after Conversion from Tacrolimus in Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Gary W Barone 1, Beverley L Ketel 1, Sameh R Abul-Ezz 2, Meredith L Lightfoot 1 1 Department of Surgery and 2 Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Little Rock, AR, USA ABSTRACT Context A successful immunosuppression regimen for combined kidney and pancreas transplants is tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. However, not all patients tolerate these immunosuppressants especially tacrolimus. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of cyclosporine as a rescue agent for tacrolimus toxicity in combined kidney and pancreas transplants. Design Retrospective. Setting Single center. Patients Thirty-five combined kidney and pancreas transplants were performed between July 1994 and January 1999. All patients were insulin dependent diabetics with end-stage renal disease. Twenty-eight (mean age: 36 years and 57% female) were available with at least 12 month follow-up. Interventions Conversion to cyclosporine following renal (biopsy proven) or pancreatic dysfunction. Main outcome mearsures Toxicity, rejection rate, and patient/transplant organ survival. Results Nineteen transplant recipients (68%) were continuously maintained on tacrolimus while nine (32%) required conversion to cyclosporine 75±20 days post-transplant. Reasons for conversion included: hyperglycemia (n=2), hemolytic-uremic syndrome (n=1), and severe tacrolimus nephrotoxicity (n=6). By 12 months posttransplant, the 19 patients maintained on tacrolimus had 5 rejections (26%). Three of the 9 patients (33%) converted to cyclosporine had an acute rejection prior to conversion. Seven of these 9 patients (78%; P=0.017 vs. patients maintained on tacrolimus) had rejections an average of 25±4 days post-conversion. Four of the 7 patients had no previous rejections prior to conversion. In spite of increased rejections, the 1- and 2-year patient/graft survivals were unchanged by converting. Conclusions Converting to cyclosporine from tacrolimus was associated with an increased risk of acute rejection especially within the first 30 days post conversion. INTRODUCTION Combined kidney and pancreas transplants (CKPT) are considered to be the treatment of choice in selected patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease requiring a renal transplant [1]. Tacrolimus (TAC), a newer formulation of cyclosporine (CSA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were all approved for clinical transplantation in the mid 1990's. More recently, sirolimus has been added to the JOP. Journal of the Pancreas http://www.joplink.net Vol. 3, No. 2 March 2002 49

transplant immunosuppression formulary. Improved patient and graft survival and decreased episodes of acute transplant rejection in CKPT have been reported with the combined use of these newer agents [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. A combination of TAC, MMF, prednisone, and most often antibody induction immunotherapy has become the preferred immunosuppression regimen for patients receiving CKPT. However once started, not all CKPT patients tolerate this combination of immunosuppressive agents especially TAC. Kaufman et al. [7] observed that 78% of their CKPT tolerated the combination of TAC/MMF long-term whereas 22% required switching to alternative medications. When intolerance to TAC occurred, CSA has often been chosen as an alternative immunosuppressant. The longterm efficacy and tolerability of CSA as a rescue agent has not been well documented in many series of CKPT [2, 3, 7]. In this current study, the tolerability of TAC was assessed in CKPT, and the outcome of CKPT recipients who were switched to CSA from TAC was reviewed. METHODS Patients Thirty-five CKPT were performed at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences between July 1994 and January 1999 and were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-eight patients were available with at least a 12- month follow-up. Demographics of these CKP recipient patients are shown in Table 1. The venous drainage for all pancreas transplants was systemic with the portal vein anastomosed to the right external iliac vein. Immunosuppression All CKPT received Nashville/Rabbit Antithymocyte (Applied Medical Research, Inc. Nashville, TN, USA) induction therapy on investigational protocol daily for 7-14 days post-transplantation. The first dose was given the day of transplant. Dosage was adjusted according to absolute CD3 lymphocyte counts (target: less than 150 lymphocytes/ml). Oral TAC (Prograf. Fujisawa USA. Deerfield, IL, USA) was started on post-transplant day 1 via a nasogastric tube at 0.1 mg/kg twice daily maintaining 12 hour trough levels of 10-15 ng/ml (IMx System: Tacrolimus II. Abbott Laboratories. Abbott Park, IL, USA). CSA (Neoral. Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Basel, Switzerland), after conversion from TAC, was started at 5 mg/kg twice daily with target 12 hour trough levels of 300-350 ng/ml (TDxFlx System: Cyclosporine Monoclonal. Whole Blood Abbott Laboratories. Abbott Park, IL, USA). All patients received a total of 1 g intravenous methylprednisolone in divided doses peri-operatively followed by an oral prednisone taper. Prednisone dose at one year was 5-10 mg/day. Ten patients received oral azathioprine (AZA) (Imuran. Glaxo Wellcome Research. Triangle Park, NC, USA) at a 2 mg/kg total daily dose while the remaining patients received oral MMF (Cellcept. Roche Pharmaceuticals. Nutley, NJ, USA) at 1,000 mg twice daily. ETHICS The induction therapy was administered in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki after receiving written informed consent. STATISTICS Data are reported as mean values ± standard deviation (SD) and ranges. Survival rates and creatinine values were compared between Table 1. Patient demographics (n=28). Age 36±2 years Gender - Female 16 (57.1%) - Male 12 (42.9%) Race - Caucasian 24 (85.7%) - African American 4 (14.3%) HLA Match 1.6±0.3 Antigens JOP. Journal of the Pancreas http://www.joplink.net Vol. 3, No. 2 March 2002 50

patients continuously receiving TAC and those converted to CSA by means of the Fisher s exact and the Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon tests, respectively. Data were analyzed by running the SPSS/PC+ package on a personal computer. A two-tailed P value of 0.05 was chosen to define the statistical significance. RESULTS Tolerability of TAC Immunosuppression Nineteen CKPT recipients (68%) were continuously maintained on TAC whereas nine recipients (32%) required conversion to CSA. Conversion occurred at an average of 75±20 days (range 14-188 days) posttransplant. Renal transplant biopsies were performed in all recipients at the time of conversion. Recipients were converted to CSA because of hyperglycemia (n=2), hemolytic-uremic syndrome (n=1), and severe TAC-induced nephrotoxicity refractory to TAC dose reductions (n=6). Patients with TAC-induced toxicity had TAC levels slightly elevated ranging from 13 to 17 ng/ml. Rejection A total of 5 rejections occurred in the 19 patients maintained continuously on TAC resulting in an overall incidence of rejection at 12 months of 26%. All cases of rejection were confirmed by renal transplant biopsy. All rejection episodes were successfully reversed. Two patients were on MMF while 3 were on AZA. These 3 patients converted to MMF post-rejection. Four rejections occurred within 30 days post-transplant while the other rejection occurred at four months posttransplant in a patient who suffered a protracted episode of emesis with resultant low TAC levels. Therefore, no acute rejection episodes occurred after 4 months. Three of the 4 early rejection episodes required antibody treatment. Three of the nine patients (33%) who were converted to CSA had acute rejection episodes prior to conversion to CSA. These rejections occurred early in the post-transplant course (average 28±5 days post-transplant), and all were successfully reversed. Importantly, 7 patients (78%; P=0.017 vs. patients maintained on tacrolimus) had rejection episodes after conversion from TAC to CSA with 4 on MMF and 3 on AZA (these 3 patients converted to MMF post-rejection). These rejections occurred early with an average of 25±4 days after conversion. All the 3 patients who had had acute rejection episodes prior to conversion to CSA had also rejection episodes after conversion; therefore, 4 patients (57%) had had no previous rejection episodes prior to CSA conversion. Two of the 7 patients who had rejection episodes, eventually lost renal transplant function and returned to dialysis. Two patients had no rejection episodes either before or after conversion. The overall incidence of rejection in the CSA converted CKPT at 12 months was 78%. Patient and Graft Survival Patient, kidney, and pancreas allograft survival rates are shown in Table 2. In patients continuously maintained on TAC the 1- and 2-year patient survival rates were 100% and 95%, respectively. One patient died of intestinal infarction 15 months posttransplant with normal allograft function. Table 2. Patient and allograft survival of patients continuously receiving tacrolimus and of patients converted to cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Patients continuously Patients converted P value receiving tacrolimus to cyclosporine (n=19) (n=9) 1 year 2 year 1 year 2 year 1 year 2 year Patient survival 19 (100%) 18 (95%) 9 (100%) 9 (100%) 1.000 1.000 Kidney survival 19 (100%) 17 (89%) 8 (89%) 7 (78%) 0.321 0.574 Pancreas survival 17 (89%) 16 (84%) 8 (89%) 8 (89%) 1.000 1.000 JOP. Journal of the Pancreas http://www.joplink.net Vol. 3, No. 2 March 2002 51

Patient survival was 100% at 2-years in the 9 patients converted to CSA. The 1- and 2-year kidney allograft survival rates were 100% and 89% respectively, in the TAC group and 89% and 78%, respectively, in the CSA conversion patients. A total of four kidneys were lost, two from each group. In the group receiving TAC, one kidney was lost at 15 months because of patient death; and one kidney failed at 22 months due to polyoma virus infection. In the patients converted to CSA, one kidney failed at 3 months because of irreversible rejection; and a second kidney failed at 14 months from chronic allograft nephropathy. The creatinine in the remaining 7 CSA converted renal transplants at 2 years averaged slightly high at 1.9±0.14 mg/dl (normal range: from 0.4 to 1.0 mg/dl) which was not significantly different from the 1.7±0.17 mg/dl in the group maintained on TAC (P=0.120). Pancreas allograft survival was defined as normal fasting glucose and normal HgbA1C without exogenous insulin administration. The 1- and 2-year pancreas allograft survival was 89% and 84% respectively in the TAC group, and 89% at both time points in the 9 patients converted to CSA. Three pancreas allografts were lost in the group receiving TAC. Two were due to irreversible rejection in the first 6 months post-transplant, and one was due to patient death at 15 months. One pancreas allograft was lost in patients converted to CSA in a recipient who had severe vascular rejection after plasmapheresis treatment for recurrent hemolytic uremic syndrome. The only one pancreas transplant converted from TAC for hyperglycemia had the HgbA1C decrease from 6.8 to 6.2% (normal range: from 4.4 to 6.4%) post conversion to CSA. CONCLUSION The combination of TAC, MMF, and prednisone for immunosuppression in CKPT recipients has proven to be very efficacious with excellent patient and graft survival and associated with a low incidence of acute cellular rejection episodes [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. However, some CKPT recipients do not necessarily tolerate all these immunosuppressive agents especially TAC. The best alternative immunosuppressive regimens for CKPT patients intolerant to TAC has not been clearly defined. In our series, 32% of our CKPT patients required discontinuation of TAC because of drugrelated toxicity during the first six months post-transplant. CSA was chosen as an alternative calcineurin inhibitor in these patients. Seven of nine patients experienced an episode of acute rejection within one month of CSA conversion (average 25±4 days). However, 1- and 2-year patient and graft survival were not significantly different in the patients converted from TAC to CSA compared to the group of patients maintained continuously on full dose TAC. While our numbers are small, 60% of the patients on AZA suffered rejections compared to 33% in the MMF group. Several other reports [2, 3] and one especially by Kaufman et al. [7] support our findings. Stegall et al. [2] did report a 16.7% conversion rate (3 patients in 18 CKPT) from TAC to CSA between 3 to 6 months posttransplant. Conversions were performed not for renal toxicity but for systemic and infections indications. They did not report any specific follow-up in these patients. Peddi et al. [3] noted that 37% of their series of CKPT on TAC developed TAC nephrotoxicity, but all initially responded to reduction in TAC doses. In the series by Kaufman et al. [7], TAC intolerability was observed in 18% of their CKPT recipients. Similarly, conversion to CSA was associated with an increased 12 month post-transplant rejection rate of 56% compared to 20% for the CKPT who remained on TAC. As in our series, 1- and 2- year patient and graft survival was not affected by the conversion. We conclude that the substitution of CSA for TAC may be associated with an increased risk of acute rejection especially within the first 30 days post conversion. Therefore, patients should be closely monitored during this time period. Two-year results are not worse in CKPT converted from TAC to CSA but JOP. Journal of the Pancreas http://www.joplink.net Vol. 3, No. 2 March 2002 52

longer-term outcomes of allograft function may be adversely affected. Patients who experience acute transplant rejection episodes have lower graft survival than those who remain free of rejection [2]. Because CSA conversion appears to be associated with an increased rate of rejection, the recent introduction of sirolimus may provide another choice. Besides changing to CSA in CKPT recipients who do not tolerate full-dose TAC especially with associated TAC nephrotoxicity, sirolimus with or without low dose TAC may be a better option. However, this combination needs further investigation in CKPT. Received July 16 th, 2001 Accepted November 14 th, 2001 Key words Drug Toxicity; Graft Rejection; Immunosuppressive Agents Abbreviations AZA: azathioprine; CKPT: combined kidney and pancreas transplants; CSA: cyclosporine; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; TAC: tacrolimus Presented at the 8 th Congress of International Pancreas and Islet Transplantation Association. Innsbruck, Austria. June 12-15, 2001. Correspondence Gary W Barone Department of Surgery University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Slot 520-4 4301 West Markham Little Rock Arkansas 72205 USA Phone: +1-501.686.6644 Fax: +1-501.686.5725 E-mail address: baronegary@uams.edu References 1. Stratta RF, Tailor RJ, Gill IS. Pancreas transplantation: a managed cure approach to diabetes. Curr Probl Surg 1996; 33:709-808. [AN 96400020] 2. Stegall MD, Simon M, Wachs ME, Chan L, Nolan C, Kam I. Mycophenolate mofetil decreases rejection in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation when combined with tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Transplantation 1997; 64:1695-700. [AN 98082867] 3. Peddi VR, Kamath S, Munda R, Demmy AM, Alexander JW, First MR. Use of tacrolimus eliminates acute rejection as a major complication following simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation. Clin Transplant 1998; 12:401-5. [AN 99004216] 4. Bruce DS, Woodle KA, Newell KA, Millis JM, Cronin DC, Loss GE, et al. Tacrolimus/mycophenolate provides superior immunosuppression relative to neoral/mycophenolate in synchronous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 1998; 30:1538-40. [AN 98300254] 5. Gruessner RWG, Burke GW, Stratta R, Sollinger H, Benedetti E, Marsh C, et al. A multicenter analysis of the first experience with FK506 for induction and rescue therapy after pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 1996; 61:261-73. [AN 96166734] 6. Gruessner RWG, Bartlett ST, Burke GW, Stock PG. Suggested guidelines for the use of tacrolimus in pancreas/kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 1998; 12:260-2. [AN 98306488] 7. Kaufman DB, Leventhal JR, Stuart J, Abecasses MM, Fryer JP, Stuart FP. Mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus as primary maintenance immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: initial experience in 50 consecutive cases. Transplantation 1999; 67:586-93. [AN 99168580] JOP. Journal of the Pancreas http://www.joplink.net Vol. 3, No. 2 March 2002 53