The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6

Similar documents
The EFSA Journal (2005) 262, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 171, 1-5

The EFSA Journal (2005) 287, 1-9

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. (Adopted on 22 January 2003)

The EFSA Journal (2004) 96, 1-5

The EFSA Journal (2005) 207, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 289, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 271, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 288, 1-7

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 10 July 2007

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Safety of the enzymatic preparation Natuphos (3-phytase) for sows 1

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 October 2007

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. (adopted on 19 June 2002)

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. (Adopted on 4 December 2002)

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for dairy buffaloes 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Avizyme 1505 (endo-1,4-β-xylanase, α-amylase, subtilisin) as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Natugrain Wheat TS (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) for use as feed additive for chickens for fattening and ducks 1

Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc 47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for pigs for fattening 1

Maximum Residue Limits for Clinacox 0.5% (diclazuril) for turkeys for fattening, chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying 1

Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening 1,2

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 19 September 2007

Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (Benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

Scientific Opinion on the modification of the terms of authorisation of Protural (sodium benzoate) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

The EFSA Journal (2004) 121, 1-13

Scientific Opinion on the modification to the formulation of GalliPro and compatibility with formic acid 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 3 February 2009

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Adopted on 21 May 2008 by the FEEDAP Panel and on 16 April 2008 by the GMO Panel

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q )

Statement on the preparation of guidance for the assessment of plant/herbal products and their constituents used as feed additives 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 350, 1-14

Withdrawal period for Coxidin for chickens and turkeys for fattening and re-examination of the provisional Maximum Residue Limit 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 195, 1-10

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2006) 385, 1-9

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2006) 406, 1-11

Scientific Opinion on the efficacy of Suilectin (Phaseolus vulgaris lectins) as a zootechnical additive for suckling piglets (performance enhancer)

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for piglets 1

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 11 July 2007

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol as a feed additive for poultry and pigs 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 336, 1-15

The EFSA Journal (2006) 384, 1-9

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1,2

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question N EFSA-Q )

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS (6-phytase) as a feed additive for finfish. Abstract

Session 47.

Safety and efficacy of Mintrex Zn (Zinc chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine) as feed additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the Safety and Efficacy of thaumatin for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Mn) as feed additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 3,4

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed and the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium bisulphate (SBS) for all species as preservative and silage additive 1

Safety of Allura Red AC in feed for cats and dogs

Scientific Opinion on the safety of Hostazym X as a feed additive for poultry and pigs 1

Safety and efficacy of Mintrex Mn (Manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine) as feed additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Cu) as feed additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 November 2008 by the FEEDAP Panel and on 29 October 2008 by the GMO Panel

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 16 July 2008

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium) as a feed additive for dogs 1

The EFSA Journal (2004) 160, 1-11

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 337, 1-17

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Abstract

Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 2 April 2009

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SUMMARY MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH. Brussels, February 2007

Safety and efficacy of Mintrex Cu (Copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine) as feed additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of MycoCell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for dairy cows 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

L 243/10 Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union L 40/19

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30236) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

SUMMARY RECORD OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD ON DECEMBER 2009 IN BRUSSELS (Section Animal Nutrition)

(FAD ; CRL/150041)

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q )

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Formi LHS (potassium diformate) as a feed additive for sows 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of diclazuril (Clinacox 0.5 %) as feed additive for chickens reared for laying 1

WX (FAD ; CRL/130025)

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of synthetic alpha-tocopherol for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Transcription:

The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the safety of the enzyme preparation Econase Wheat Plus for use as feed additive for chickens for fattening (Question No EFSA-Q-2005-010) Adopted on 15 June 2005 SUMMARY The product Econase Wheat Plus is a preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Trichoderma reesei (CBS 529.94), and endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase produced by Trichoderma reesei (CBS 526.94) intended for use in wheat based poultry diets. The safety evaluation (consumer, user and environment) of Econase Wheat has been done previously by the Scientific Committee on Animal Nutrition (SCAN) (16 October 2002). In a further safety assessment of Econase Wheat Plus, limited to the target animals (chickens for fattening and turkeys for fattening), SCAN concluded that, due to the inadequate experimental design, another tolerance test in chickens for fattening was necessary in order to assess the safety of the product. The European Food Safety Authority received a request to assess the safety for chickens for fattening. A new tolerance test was provided by the petitioner. This test carried out with 3360 chickens for fattening over a 35-day period, at the recommended highest dose of xylanase (analysed in-feed value) and at an intended 10 times the recommended highest dose of glucanase (analysed in-feed value), demonstrated no adverse effects on performance, mortality rate and carcass characteristics. Incidence of dyschondroplasia like tibial aberrations was not affected. Consequently, the FEEDAP Panel is of the opinion that the safety of Econase Wheat Plus for chickens for fattening has been demonstrated. Keywords: feed additive, tolerance, xylanase, glucanase, safety, chickens for fattening

Opinion on Econase Wheat Plus for chickens for fattening 2/6 BACKGROUND Council Directive 70/524/EEC establishes rules governing the Community authorisation of additives for animal nutrition and in particular defines the conditions that a substance/product should meet to get authorisation. The company AB Enzymes is seeking provisional Community authorisation of its enzyme product with the trade name ECONASE Wheat Plus L and P, as a feed additive intended for use in chickens for fattening under the category "Enzyme" (Table 1). Table 1. Description of the product: Product category: Enzyme Trade name: ECONASE Wheat Plus L and P Preparation of endo-1, 4-beta-xylanase (IUB 3.2.1.8) from Description: Trichoderma reesei CBS 529.94 and endo-1, 3(4)-betaglucanase (IUB 3.2.1.6) from Trichoderma reesei CBS 526.94 (in ratio of 4:1) Target animal category: Chickens for fattening Applicant: AB Enzymes Member State Rapporteur: FI Type of request: Provisional authorisation In accordance with the above legislation, the Commission received a request from this company, through FI, the Member State rapporteur chosen by the company, to authorise its product under the conditions set out in Table 2. Supporting data produced by the company were compiled in a dossier and accompanied that application. All Member States received the dossier. This dossier was made available to the European Food Safety Authority directly by the company, via its Member State rapporteur. The safety of the product Econase Wheat had been evaluated by the SCAN in its opinion on the use of certain enzymes in animal feedingstuffs adopted on 4 June 1998, updated on 16 October 2002 (available on http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scan/out96_en.pdf) and in its opinion on the safety of the enzymatic product Econase Wheat Plus for use as feed additive in chickens and turkeys for fattening, adopted on 22 January 2003 (available on http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scan/out109_en.pdf). TERMS OF REFERENCE In view of the above, the Commission asks the European Food Safety Authority to deliver an opinion on the safety of the enzyme preparation "Econase Wheat Plus L and P", which is a preparation of endo-1, 4-beta-xylanase (IUB 3.2.1.8) from Trichoderma reesei CBS 529.94 and endo-1, 3(4)-beta-glucanase (IUB 3.2.1.6) from Trichoderma reesei CBS 526.94, for the chickens for fattening, when used under the conditions set out in Table 2 below, taking into account the background and the information submitted by the applicant in the dossier.

Opinion on Econase Wheat Plus for chickens for fattening 3/6 Table 2. Annex entry Endo-1,4- Additive beta-xylanase EC 3.2.1.8 Endo-1,3(4)- beta-glucanase EC 3.2.1.6 Chemical formula, description Preparation of endo-1,4 -betaxylanase produced by Trichoderma reesei (CBS 529.94) and endo- 1,3(4)-beta-glucanase produced by Trichoderma reesei (CBS 526.94) having minimum activities of: Solid form: - 800 000 BXU 1 g -1-200 000 BU 2 g -1 Species or category of animal Chickens for fattening Maximum age Minimum content Maximum content Units of activity kg -1 of complete feedingstuff - 6 000 BXU 1 500 BU - Other provisions 1. In the directions for use of the additive and pre-mixture, indicate the storage temperature, storage life, and stability to pelleting. 2. Recommended dose per kg of complete feedingstuff: 16 000 24 000 BXU 4 000 8 000 BU Liquid form: - 120 000 BXU 1 g -1-30 000 BU 2 g -1 3. For use in compound feed rich in non-starch polysaccharides (mainly arabinoxylans and glucans), e.g. containing more than 53.5% wheat 1 1 BXU is the amount of enzyme which liberates 0.06 micromoles of reducing sugars (xylose equivalents) from birch xylan per minute at ph 5.3 and 50 C 2 1 BU is the amount enzyme which liberates 0.06 micromoles of reducing sugars (glucose equivalents) from barley beta-glucan per minute at ph 4.8 and 50 C.

Opinion on Econase Wheat Plus for chickens for fattening 4/6 ASSESSMENT 1. Introduction The product Econase Wheat Plus is a preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Trichoderma reesei (CBS 529.94), and endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase produced by Trichoderma reesei (CBS 526.94) with a minimum activity of, for solid form: 800000 BXU g - 1 and 200000 BU g -1 and for liquid form: 120000 BXU g -1 and 30000 BU g -1, intended for use in wheat-based poultry diets. The safety evaluation (consumer, user, and environment) of Econase Wheat has been done previously by the SCAN 3 (16 October 2002). In a further safety assessment of Econase Wheat Plus, limited to the target animals (chickens for fattening and turkeys for fattening), SCAN 4 (22 January 2003) concluded that another tolerance test in broilers was necessary in order to assess and demonstrate the safety, due to the weak experimental design (only 40 animals) and to the fact that besides the occurrence of many leg disorders, enlargement of duodenum and jejunum was noted. Therefore, in the present dossier a new tolerance test with broilers was included by the petitioner. 2. Safety for the chickens for fattening The 35 day tolerance test for Econase Wheat Plus was conducted as part of a study including several xylanase preparations and 5600 chickens for fattening. Only the relevant treatments are reported here. 3360 one-day old chickens for fattening (Ross breed) were housed on floor pens and randomly distributed over three dietary treatments: control, Econase Wheat Plus 24000 BXU kg -1 (highest recommended dose) and Econase Wheat Plus 240000 BXU kg -1 (10 times highest recommended dose), with eight pens per treatment and 70 chicks of each sex per pen. Analyses of the original enzyme preparation confirmed the xylanase activity (801000 BXU kg -1 ). For the first two weeks birds were fed a starter diet; thereafter a grower diet until 5 days before slaughter. For the last 5 days a finisher diet without a coccidiostat was used. The solid form of Econase Wheat Plus was used in the all-mash diets. Feed consumption was recorded during grower and finisher period and body weight of groups on day 0, 14 and 35. Mortality was checked daily. At day 35, all animals were slaughtered, carcass and abdominal fat weighed and livers collected. Furthermore, bones (tibiotarsus, os femoris) were collected from 32 birds per treatment, chosen at random, for chemical analysis (ash, P, Ca), bone area and density (computer tomography) and occurrence and scoring of the degree of dyschondroplasia. It can be concluded that Econase Wheat Plus at 240000 BXU kg -1 has no detrimental effects on performance, mortality rate or carcass characteristics of the chickens (Table 3). The previous SCAN opinion (2003) identified many leg disorders. In the present experiment, leg disorders were very low (1 bird per treatment) during the whole experiment. The incidence of dyschondroplasia-like aberrations (20-25 % of all investigated bones) were not different from those on the control diet. Measure of the in-feed enzyme activity suggests that the studies were done at about 6.5 times 7.5 times the highest recommended dose of xylanase and glucanase respectively. However, FEEDAP Panel believes that this difference with the added enzyme is due to analytical problems. 3 http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scan/out96_en.pdf 4 http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scan/out109_en.pdf

Opinion on Econase Wheat Plus for chickens for fattening 5/6 Table 3. Effect of feeding Econase Wheat Plus on performance, carcass traits and some bone parameters of chickens for fattening, fed a wheat-based diet during 35 days Control Econase Wheat Plus 1 24000 BXU kg -1 Econase Wheat Plus 2 240000 BXU kg -1 Average feed consumption (g bird -1 ) Starter 3 449 b 474 ab 486 a Grower/finisher 2310 2262 2292 Total 2760 2736 2777 Average daily gain (g day -1 ) Starter 26.4 c 28.8 b 30.2 a Grower/finisher 66.1 66.3 67.2 Total 49.8 b 50.8 ab 52.0 a Feed /Gain ratio Starter 1.224 a 1.182 a 1.151 b Grower/finisher 1.760 1.720 1.709 Total 1.631 a 1.583 b 1.571 b Mortality (%) Starter 1.31 1.37 1.38 Grower/finisher 0.63 1.05 0.88 Total 1.92 2.40 2.24 Live weight at day 35 (g) 1733 c 1769 bc 1808 ab Carcass yield (%) 63.2 b 64.5 a 65.1 a Abdominal fat (%) 0.76 a 0.87 a 0.99 b Total bone area (mm 2 ) 103.3 111.8 116.1 Total bone density (mg cm -3 ) 276 273 276 Corticalis strength index 43.9 45.4 48.9 Tibia weight (g) 13.9 b 15.9 ab 16.8 a Tibia ash (% DM) 37.6 a 35.8 b 36.2 b Tibia Ca (% DM) 12.6 a 11.5 b 11.6 b Tibia P (% DM) 6.4 a 5.9 b 6.2 ab Tibial dyschondroplasia (n) 6/30 7/26 7/27 a,b,c: means in a row with different superscripts are significantly different (P 0.05) 1 Analysed values for xylanase and β-glucanase (starter, grower, finisher) 42900, 50300, 84500 BXU kg -1 and 7800, 6100, 4900 BU kg -1 2 Analysed values for xylanase and β-glucanase (starter, grower, finisher) 169000, 151000, 144000 BXU kg -1 and 62800, 62500, 54700 BU kg -1 3 Starter feed: days 0-14; grower feed: days 15-30; finisher feed: days 31-35 CONCLUSIONS The tolerance test demonstrated no detrimental effects on performance, mortality rate, carcass characteristics of the chickens for fattening and tibial discondroplasia was not affected. Consequently, the FEEDAP Panel is of the opinion that the safety of Econase Wheat Plus for chickens for fattening has been demonstrated.

Opinion on Econase Wheat Plus for chickens for fattening 6/6 DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO EFSA 1. Supplementary dossier. Econase Wheat Plus. New tolerance data on broilers and answers to the questions of Austria, France, Germany, The Netherlands and The United Kingdom. February 2004. Submitted by AB Enzymes Oy, Finland. 2. Dossier on Econase Wheat Plus as an additive in feedingstuffs for chickens and turkeys for fattening. Supplement 3. Answers to the questions of the United Kingdom and France; final reports of new efficacy studies on chickens and turkeys for fattening. February 2005. Submitted by AB Enzymes Oy, Finland. PANEL MEMBERS Arturo Anadón, Margarita Arboix Arzo, Georges Bories, Paul Brantom, Joaquim Brufau de Barberà, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Joop de Knecht, Noël Dierick, Gerhard Flachowsky, Anders Franklin, Jürgen Gropp, Ingrid Halle, Anne-Katrine Lundebye Haldorsen, Alberto Mantovani, Kimmo Peltonen, Guido Rychen, Pascal Sanders, Amadeu Soares, Pieter Wester and Wilhelm Windisch