Lower limb and associated injuries in frontal-impact road traffic collisions.

Similar documents
Review. 1. Kinetic energy is a calculation of:

Factors affecting mortality of critical care trauma patients

Factors affecting mortality of hospitalized chest trauma patients in United Arab Emirates

McHenry Western Lake County EMS System Paramedic, EMT-B and PHRN Optional Continuing Education 2019 #2 Blunt Trauma

Trauma Overview. Chapter 22

The biomechanics of lower limb injuries in frontal-impact road traffic collisions

The Dynamics of Trauma. Jamie Syrett, MD Director of Prehospital Care Rochester General Health System

Kinetic Energy Energy in Motion KE = Mass (weight) X Velocity (speed)² 2 Double Weight = Energy Double Speed = Energy IS THE GREATEST DETERMINANT

Stephen A. Ridella, Amanda Beyersmith National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Kristin Poland, PhD National Transportation Safety Board

Side Impact Crashworthiness Evaluation. Guidelines for Rating Injury Measures

CASPER CASPER. COVER Workshop - 13th March 2012 Berlin, Germany CHILD ADVANCED SAFETY PROJECT FOR EUROPEAN ROADS. Abdominal injuries

Injury prevention in motorcycle accidents: Italian evidence from MotorcycleAccidents in-depth Study (MAIDS)

Mechanism of injury Assessment of the trauma patient. Humaryanto

Accident or Injury Form 1 TODAY'S DATE: PATIENT INFORMATION Last Name: First Name: MI: Birth Date:

INJURY PATTERNS IN SIDE POLE CRASHES

Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine

Trauma Biomechanics. Third Edition

Little Kids in Big Crashes The Bio-mechanics of Kids in Car Crashes. Lisa Schwing, RN Trauma Program Manager Dayton Children s

ASPECTS REGARDING THE IMPACT SPEED, AIS AND HIC RELATIONSHIP FOR CAR-PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS

STREETS AND PUBLIC SAFETY

Upper extremity open fractures in hospitalized road traffic accident patients: adult versus pediatric cases

What are the predictors of scapula fractures in high-impact blunt trauma patients and why do we miss them in the emergency department?

Upper Extremity Injury Patterns in Side Impact Crashes

LANGUAGE OF ANATOMY PART 1

eceleration Impact Experiments and Deceleration Injury Mechanism Analysis on the Thoracic and Abdominal Organs

D. Pre-Hospital Trauma Triage and Bypass Algorithm

Simone Piantini, Marco Mangini, Niccolò Baldanzini, Marco Pierini, Andrea Franci, Adriano Peris

Body Changes With Aging

Focused History and Physical Examination of the

Activity Three: Where s the Bleeding?

MOORE CHIROPRACTIC CENTER 707 Sunset Street Denton, TX (940)

T he rising proportion of the population aged 65 and older

Clinical outcomes of multiple rib fractures: does age matter?

Chapter 2 Triage. Introduction. The Trauma Team

Frontal Offset Crashworthiness Evaluation. Guidelines for Rating Injury Measures

During the initial repair and inflammatory phase, focus should be on placing the lower limbs in a position to ensure that:

INJURIES, DEATHS AND COSTS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES IN WHICH ALCOHOL WAS A FACTOR, WISCONSIN, 2013

Factors Affecting Pneumonia Occurring to Patients with Multiple Rib Fractures

Assessment of the Trauma Patient

Lab no 1 Structural organization of the human body

Characteristics of Thoracic Organ Injuries in Frontal Crashes. Craig P. Thor

INJURIES, DEATHS AND COSTS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES IN WHICH ALCOHOL WAS A FACTOR, WISCONSIN, 2011

MORBIDITY, MORTALITY AND COSTS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES IN WHICH ALCOHOL WAS A FACTOR, WISCONSIN, 2010

Deceleration during 'real life' motor vehicle collisions: A sensitive predictor for the risk of sustaining a cervical spine injury?

INCIDENCE, HEALTH OUTCOMES AND COSTS RELATED TO MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES IN WHICH ALCOHOL WAS A FACTOR, WISCONSIN, 2006

Analysis of Morphomics Parameters by Gender and BMI Groups: Thorax Shape and H point Location

Severe trauma presenting to the resuscitation room of a Hong Kong emergency department

Resource Document 3: Kinematics of Trauma. I. Introduction

Frontal Offset Crashworthiness Evaluation. Guidelines for Rating Injury Measures

CASPER. CASPER 1 YO child human FE model CHILD ADVANCED SAFETY PROJECT FOR EUROPEAN ROADS

The Impact of Helmet Use and Alcohol on Traumatic Brain Injury Related Hospitalizations for Motorcycle Crashes in Wisconsin,

Impact-Shield Type CRS in JNCAP

If you where you in a vehicle at the time of the accident, please complete 1a. below. If you where not in a vehicle, please go to 1b on page 3.

Body Organizations Flashcards

PREDICTION OF PRE-IMPACT OCCUPANT KINEMATIC BEHAVIOR BASED ON THE MUSCLE ACTIVITY DURING FRONTAL COLLISION

Pediatric Abdomen Trauma

England & Wales 2 YEARS OF SEVERE INJURY IN CHILDREN

DRIVE CLEAR OF PAIN A COMFORTABLE RIDE WITH ERGONOMIC ADVICE THE KEY TO YOU WILL BE SITTING PRETTY SIMPLE TIPS FOR

A Simulation Study on the Efficacy of Advanced Belt Restraints to Mitigate the Effects of Obesity for Rear-Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes

Professional Development & Training MM3. Firefighter Prehospital Care Program. Maintenance Module 3 Course Mill Version

Overview. Worsening situation Top 10 leading causes of death /7/2017. Seat belt sign

Anatomy. Anatomy deals with the structure of the human body, and includes a precise language on body positions and relationships between body parts.

Every day thousands of people become the accidental victims of trauma.

Injury caused by an object breaking the skin and entering the body. immediate intervention to repair internal

LECTURE TOPIC ASSIGNMENTS

ACCIDENT CLAIM DOCTOR S STATEMENT

PHYSICAL EDUCATION. 4º E.S.O. 2nd TERM. The skeletal and muscular systems.

Effects of Muscle Activation on Occupant Kinematics in Frontal Impacts

Introduction to The Human Body

Injury Patterns of Older Car Occupants, Older Pedestrians or Cyclists in Road Traffic Crashes with Passenger Cars in Europe Results from SENIORS

Active-Assisted Stretches

INJURY RISKS OF CHILDREN TRAVELLING IN CARS. Heiko Johannsen Accident Research Unit Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Germany. Paper Number

3/10/17 Spinal a Injury 1

Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia. Keywords: inverse dynamics analysis, musculoskeletal model, muscle activity, intradiscal force

PROTOCOLS. Lap-belt syndrome. Principal investigator. Background

Review. 1. Peritonitis would MOST likely result following injury to the: A. liver. B. spleen. C. kidney. D. stomach.

Lecture 2. Statics & Dynamics of Rigid Bodies: Human body 30 August 2018

Anatomy The study of the body's structure.

United States Patent (19) Groesch et al.

The Spine.

SMJ Singapore Medical Journal

Contents. Introduction... viii. How to use this book... xi. Chapter 1. Pelvic movements Chapter 2. Trunk movements... 15

The Severity of Pedestrian Injuries in Alcohol-Related Collisions

UNDERSTANDING CAR CRASHES: WHEN PHYSICS MEETS BIOLOGY

SCIWORA Rozlyn McTeer BSN, RN, CEN Pediatric Trauma Coordinator Trauma Services OBJECTIVES DEFINITION 11/8/2017. Identify SCIWORA.

CORE STANDARDS STANDARDS USED IN TARN REPORTS

Shenandoah Co. Fire & Rescue. Injuries to. and Spine. December EMS Training Bill Streett Training Section Chief

DOSE-RESPONSE MODELS AND EDR DATA FOR ASSESSMENT OF INJURY RISK AND EFFECTIVENESS OF SAFETY SYSTEMS

Traumatic injuries of knee and hip

Using human body models to evaluate the efficacy of cervical collars in cervical instability

DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT

Injuries to the Extremities

Effectiveness of airbag restraints in frontal crashes - what European field studies tell us

Spinal Biomechanics & Sitting Posture

Risk Factors Predicting Mortality in Spinal Cord Injury in Nigeria

CASE REPORT. Occult spinal cord injury sustained by high. velocity automobile collision

DRIVE CLEAR OF PAIN ERGONOMIC ADVICE THE KEY TO DRIVING WELL YOU WILL BE SITTING PRETTY. simple TIps for STAYING FIT

Side Impact Simulations using THUMS and WorldSID

Therapy following a neck of femur fracture

GOLDEN PROTECTOR CLAIM DOCTOR S STATEMENT

Transcription:

Lower limb and associated injuries in frontal-impact road traffic collisions. Mohannad B. Ammori 1, 2, Hani O. Eid 2, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan 2 1. Royal Bolton Hospital, Farnworth, Bolton, United Kingdom 2. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, UAE Abstract Objectives: To study the relationship between severity of injury of the lower limb and severity of injury of the head, thoracic, and abdominal regions in frontal-impact road traffic collisions. Methods: Consecutive hospitalised trauma patients who were involved in a frontal road traffic collision were prospectively studied over 18 months. Patients with at least one Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 3 or AIS 2 injuries within two AIS body regions were included. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the severity of injury to the head, chest or abdomen. Low severity group had an AIS < 2 and high severity group had an AIS 2. Backward likelihood logistic regression models were used to define significant factors affecting the severity of head, chest or abdominal injuries. Results: Eighty-five patients were studied. The backward likelihood logistic regression model defining independent factors affecting severity of head injuries was highly significant (p =0.01, nagelkerke r square = 0.1) severity of lower limb injuries was the only significant factor (p=0.013) having a negative correlation with head injury (Odds ratio of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.45-0.91). Conclusion: Occupants who sustain a greater severity of injury to the lower limb in a frontal-impact collision are likely to be spared from a greater severity of head injury. Keywords: Frontal-impact, road traffic collision, lower limb injury. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v16i1.40 Cite as: Ammori MB, Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM. Lower limb and associated injuries in frontal-impact road traffic collisions. Afri Health Sci. 2016;16(1): 306-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v16i1.40 Introduction An analysis of the biomechanics of a road traffic collision can provide clues to establish the diagnosis of occult injuries 1,2. An appreciation of the mechanisms of injury and the relationship between the injuries sustained is imperative to guiding the clinical suspicion of the physician towards certain injuries when conducting the primary and secondary survey. An example of this is the raised probability of a solid organ injury in the presence of a concomitant fracture to the rib and the pelvis 3. Correspondling author: Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Acute Care Surgeon, Point-of-Care Sonographer, and Statistical Consultant Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates Tel 00971 3 7137579 Fax: 00971 3 7672067 E-mail: fabuzidan@uaeu.ac.ae 306 In a frontal-impact collision, there is a sudden deceleration of the vehicle. The force of the initial collision is frequently transmitted throughout the lower limbs 4. Furthermore, the knee may collide with the dashboard whilst in flexion, which could result in a posterior hip dislocation 5. Lee et al reported that restrained occupants who sustained an injury to the knee, thigh or hip were four times less likely to suffer from a serious intra-abdominal injury in a frontal-impact road traffic collision 6. Although the advantages of the safety belt are well-established 7,8, the relationship between lower limb injuries and other body regions is less well understood. We hypothesized that, in a frontal-impact collision, a greater severity of injury to the lower limb is preventative of a compressive load and the consequential severity of injury to the head, thoracic, and abdominal region. We aimed to study the relationship between the severity of injury to the lower limb and the severity of injury to the head, thoracic, and abdominal regions in frontal-impact road traffic collisions.

Patients and methods Between April 2006 and October 2007, the data of consecutive patients who sustained injuries, as a consequence of a frontal-impact road traffic collision, requiring admission, or those who died after arrival to the Emergency Department in Al-Ain or Tawam Hospital, were prospectively collected. Al-Ain Hospital and Tawam Hospital are the two major trauma centres of Al-Ain, which is the fourth largest city in the United Arab Emirates with a population of around 500,000. The patients or their caregivers signed a consent form for the acquisition of data for research purposes. A unique case number was used to identify each patient and the data entered into the database was anonymous. The patients of the present study are a subset of the cohort used for previously published research into other elements of the injuries sustained in road traffic collisions 7. This study was approved by The Local Ethics Committee of Al-Ain Health district area (RECA/02/44) and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The information included patient demographics such as age and gender, the patient s position within the vehicle, ejection from the vehicle, and descriptions of the injuries sustained. The injuries sustained were classified according to the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). Patients with at least one region with an AIS 3 or AIS 2 injuries within two AIS body regions were selected for this study. Patients must have been travelling inside a vehicle and had a frontal-impact collision to be included. Pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists were excluded, as they would be subject to an alternative mechanism of injury. For the purposes of this study, the AIS anatomical regions concerned were the lower extremities, the head, thorax, and abdomen. Severity of injury of each region was graded as follows: no injury (AIS = 0), minor (AIS = 1), moderate (AIS = 2), serious (AIS = 3), severe (AIS = 4), and critical (AIS = 5). Statistical analysis Data was expressed as median (range) or number (percentage) as appropriate. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the severity of injury to the head, chest or abdomen. Low severity group had an AIS < 2 and high severity group had an AIS 2. Backward likelihood logistic regression models were used to define significant factors affecting the severity of head, chest or abdominal injuries. The dependent outcome variable was the head, chest, or abdominal injury severity group (low or high severity group) while the independent variables were age, gender, usage of safety seatbelt, whether thrown from the vehicle, severity of lower limb injury (ordinal data), and position in the vehicle (driver, front seat passenger, or back seat passenger, categorical data). Significance was accepted at p<0.05 in the model. We analysed the data using the software package SPSS 20 (Chicago, Illinois, USA). Results A total of 256 patients, who were vehicle occupants, were involved in frontal-impact collisions, 85 (33.2%) of who met the inclusion criteria for the study. They had median (range) age of 26 (2-58) years and 65 (76.5%) were male. The demographic details of the patients are summarised in Table 1. The backward likelihood logistic regression model defining independent factors affecting severity of head injuries was highly significant (p =0.01, Nagelkerke R Square = 0.1) Severity of lower limb injuries was the only significant factor (p=0.013) having a negative correlation with head injury (Estimate of - 0.44 and an odds ratio of 0.64). The studied models using the same variables did not predict severity of chest injury (p =0.13, Nagelkerke R Square of 0.04) neither severity of abdominal injuries (p =0.11,Nagelkerke R Square of 0.05). 307

Table 1: Demography of the studied hospitalized vehicle occupants (n=85) of frontal-impact road traffic collisions Variable Age (years) 26 (2 58) Male / Female 65 (76.5 %) / 20 (23.5 %) Driver / Front seat passenger/ Back seat passenger 45 (52.9 %) /24 (28.2 %)/16 (18.8 %) Seatbelt usage 12 (14.1 %) Ejected 11 (12.9 %) Injury Severity Score 14 (8 45) Mortality 4 (4.7 %) Categorical data are presented as number (percentage) and ordered and continuous data as median (range) as appropriate Discussion This study has demonstrated that occupants who sustained a greater severity of injury to the lower limb in a frontal-impact collision were often spared injuries of a greater severity to the head. We found no association between the severity of injury to the lower limb and the severity of injury to the thorax or the abdomen. A frontal-impact collision is characterised by a sudden deceleration of the vehicle, and a subsequent deceleration of the vehicle occupant through the application of direct stresses to bodily regions. A direct axial compressive load may be applied to the lower limb, as this regularly sits as the most anterior component of the body of the seated occupant. Drivers are subjected to an additional compressive stress on the femur due to the application of their right foot on the brake pedal and the contraction of muscle when bracing 9. In the event that the force is sufficient to result in a fracture or dislocation, the lower limb would have absorbed a significant portion of the energy generated upon impact. Although sustaining injuries to the lower extremities is, of course, undesirable and unintentional to the vehicle occupant, it is not as life threatening as injuries to the head, chest or abdomen 6. In a cohort of occupants who wore safety belts, Lee et al reported a negative correlation between a knee, thigh or hip injury and serious intra-abdominal injuries. Lee et al attributed a serious intra-abdominal injury to the safety belt. The contradictory absence of an association between a fracture or dislocation of the lower limb and the severity of intra-abdominal injury in our study is supportive of Lee et al. s findings 6 because the majority of vehicle occupants (86.4%) in our study did not wear a safety belt. The absence of a safety belt alters the mechanism of injury. In a frontal-impact collision, the head, neck and trunk of an unrestrained occupant would travel at a greater velocity in comparison to the lower limb due to the distribution of body mass and the muscular contraction of the lower limb against the toe pan, which provides 308

resistance to forward translation 10. If a fracture or dislocation of the lower limb were not sustained, a greater compressive force would have probably acted against the head and thoracic region, as a consequence of impaction against the windscreen and the steering wheel. Limitations We acknowledge that our study failed to include patients who were pronounced dead prior to arrival at Al-Ain or Tawam Hospital. A natural selection bias must be considered in the interpretation of these results, as patients with a greater severity of thoracic or head injuries may have been pronounced dead at the scene or prior to arrival at the Emergency Department. However, it is important to note the application of the results of this study to those patients who arrive at the Emergency Department for assessment and management in the trauma bay. The patient cohort for our study was relatively small. This was demonstrated by the large confidence interval of the odds ratio of the severity of the lower limb injury in the direct logistic regression model (Table 2). However, this data includes all patients who were admitted or died after arrival to the Emergency Department with injuries sustained in a frontal-impact road traffic collision over an 18-month period in a city, with a population of around 500,000. Table 2: Backward likelihood logistic regression model defining independent factors affecting severity of head injuries 95% CI Variable Estimate SE Wald test P value OR OR -0.44 0.18 6.24 0.013 0.64 0.45-0.91 Severity of lower limb injury Constant factor Odds Ratio (OR); Confidence Interval (CI) 0.42 0.3 1.87 0.17 1.52 Although an analysis of the effect of specific types of lower limb injury in predicting severity of injuries of other body regions was considered, this could not be undertaken due to the limited number of patients of this study. The logistic regression model was highly significant, but the R square value was low (0.1), which is indicative that the findings of the direct logistic regression model explain approximately 10% of the variation of the data. Conclusion An understanding of the mechanisms of vehicle occupant injury in frontal-impact collisions is useful in determining the association of injuries sustained in different body regions. Occupants who sustain a greater severity of injury to the lower limb in a frontal-impact collision are likely to be spared from a greater severity of head injury. Acknowledgements This study was supported by an interdisciplinary UAE University grant no. 02-078-1/4. Conflict of interest None declared by all authors. References 1. American College of Surgeons. Biomechanics of Injury. In: American College of Surgeons (eds). Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors, 7th ed. Chicago, IL; 2004. P. 315-335. 309

2. Mackay M. Engineering in accidents: vehicle design and injuries. Injury 1994; 25:615-21. 3. Al-Hassani A, Afifi I, Abdelrahman H, El-Menyar A, Almadani A, Recicar J, Al-Thani H, Maull K, Latifi R. Concurrent rib and pelvic fractures as an indicator of solid abdominal organ injury. Int J Surg. 2013;11:483-6. 4. Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM. Biomechanics of road traffic collision injuries: a clinician's perspective. Singapore Med J 2007; 48:693-700 5. Moore KL, Dalley AF. Lower Limb. In: Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 5th ed, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia; 2006. P. 683. 6. Lee J, Conroy C, Coimbra R, Tominaga GT, Hoyt DB. Injury patterns in frontal crashes: the association between knee-thigh-hip (KTH) and serious intra-abdominal injury. Accid Anal Prev 2010; 42:50-55 7. Abu-Zidan FM, Abbas AK, Hefny AF, Eid HO, Grivna M. Effects of seat belt usage on injury pattern and outcome of vehicle occupants after road traffic collisions: prospective study. World J Surg 2012; 36:255-259 8. Abbas AK, Hefny AF, Abu-Zidan FM. Seatbelts and road traffic collision injuries. World J Emerg Surg. 2011;6:18. 9.. Tencer AF, Kaufman R, Ryan K, Grossman DC, Henley BM, Mann F et al. Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN). Femur fractures in relatively low speed frontal crashes: the possible role of muscle forces. Accid Anal Prev 2002; 34:1-11 10. De Leva P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's Segment Inertia Parameters. J Biomechanics 1996; 29:1223-1230. 310