ILLUMENATE Pivotal Stellarex DCB IDE Study 12-Month Results

Similar documents
Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

ILLUMENATE FIH Direct DCB Cohort 12-Month Results

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

DCB level 1 evidence review

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Vessel Preparation: What does it mean and what are the current tools? Lawrence Garcia, MD St. Elizabeth s Medical Center Boston, MA, USA

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

Are Drug-coated balloons Durable? Level 1 evidence review. Koen Keirse, MD Vascular Surgery, RZ Tienen Tienen, Belgium

MICHAEL R. JAFF, DO MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES. Medtronic Further. Together

Ovation. Sean Lyden, MD Department Chair, Vascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

Directional Atherectomy and Gender Outcomes in DEFINTIVE LE

Atherectomy: Jetstream and Directional. George S. Chrysant, M.D.

6-month 0utcomes of a Novel Sirolimus Coated DCB Technology Evaluated in SFA Thomas Zeller, MD University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

IN.PACT AV Access IDE Study Full Baseline Data. Robert Lookstein, MD MHCDL New York, NY On Behalf of the IN.PACT AV ACCESS Investigators

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC on behalf of KANSHAS 1 investigators; Tepe G, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Deloose K, Verbist J, Goverde P, Zeller T

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Importance of Thorough Vessel Preparation Followed By Anti- Restenotic Therapy: An Update from the DEFINITIVE AR Study

The Lutonix BTK Clinical Trial Programme: Status Update and Real World Clinical Experience

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

New Data to Shape the Era of Drug Elution in Peripheral Interventions

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

Lutonix DCB in BTK Update on the BTK real world registry and RCT

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

The present status of selfexpanding. for CLI: Why and when to use. Sean P Lyden MD Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Ohio

Adventitial Drug Infusion to Prevent Restenosis

Cutting/scoring balloon Cryoplasty Drug-eluting balloon Brachytherapy Debulking Restent (BMS or DES) John R. Laird, MD

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

Real PTX RCT: 3 year data from a randomized comparison of DCB vs. DES in femoropopliteal lesions

Fabrizio Fanelli, MD, EBIR Director Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department "Careggi " University Hospital Florence - Italy

Device Evolution. Atherectomy: Where Do We Stand After 12 Years Since FDA Clearance. Where Do We Stand? 4/18/2015

William A. Gray MD System Chief of Cardiovascular Services, Main Line Health President, Lankenau Heart Institute Wynnewood, PA USA

Stellarex Drug-coated 0.035" Angioplasty Balloon. Featuring EnduraCoat Technology. The Clear DCB Choice

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project

Nicolas W Shammas, MD, MS

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

The latest generation DEB

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

Update on the OPTIMIZE BTK Trial. Marianne Brodmann, MD Division of Angiology Medical University Graz, Austria

Clinical use and safety of the Lutonix DCB for the treatment of BTK: interim data from a prospective registry

Endovascular Therapy vs. Open Femoral Endarterectomy Rationale and Design of the Randomized PESTO Trial

Contemporary use of DCBs, Ranger clinical trial and investigator sponsored research

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

OCT Guided Atherectomy: Initial Results of the VISION Trial Using the Pantheris Catheter. Patrick Muck, MD

The Utility of Atherectomy and the Jetstream Atherectomy System

DISRUPT PAD. (( Data Summary )) DISRUPT PAD Data Summary SPL Rev. B 2016 Shockwave Medical Inc. All rights reserved.

Lessons learnt from DES in the SFA is there any ideal concept so far?

The Role of Lithotripsy in Solving the Challenges of Vascular Calcium. Thomas Zeller, MD

Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty. Thomas Zeller MD Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg & Bad Krozingen, Germany

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

DCB From a Pre-Clinical Perspective: The Relevance of Paclitaxel Dose and Coating Integrity

BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice

DESIGN GOALS AND PRE- CLINICAL EVIDENCE OF NEXT GENERATION DCB

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

THE SCIENCE BEHIND DRUG COATED BALLOONS OUTCOMES

Vessel Preparation Prior to DCB and Stenting: How to Do It.

Evolving Role of Drug-Eluting Stents In Complex SFA - Majestic Trial Data

DURABLE. CONSISTENT. SAFE. IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon

Long-term results with interwoven nitinol stents vs. BMS vs. DCB

Drug- Coated Balloons for the SFA: Overview of Technology and Results

January 23, Vascular and oncological interventional radiology Paris Descartes University

LIFESTREAM TM First look at the BOLSTER 2-year follow up data

Patterns of Restenosis: A Core Lab-driven Assessment of SFA Restenosis and a Potential Shift to Unify Various Trials Lawrence A. Garcia, MD St.

DISRUPT CAD. Todd J. Brinton, MD Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine Adjunct Professor of Bioengineering Stanford University

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

Current Status and Limitations in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

Disclosures. Rational Selection of Endovascular Options for the SFA and Popliteal: What Works Where and for How Long?

TOBA Trial 12 months Results

Extreme SFA Lesions: DETOUR I 12- Month Results in Lesions >30cm. Sean Lyden, MD Chairman Vascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Ohio

Preliminary 6-month results of VMI-CFA trial

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions

Endovascular Options in Critical Limb Ischemia: Below The Knee Therapies

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

Long-term Zilver PTX Data from Japan: 5-year Results in the Real World

Drug Elution, Data, and Decisions

The BATTLE Trial Comparing Bare Metal to Drug Eluting Stents for Intermediate Length Lesions of the SFA

Study of a Balloon-Expandable Covered Stent for Obstructive Lesions in the Iliac Artery

Zilver PTX Post-Market Surveillance Study of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Treating Femoropopliteal Artery Disease in Japan: 24-Month Results

PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF ARTERIAL RESTENOSIS

First time data release: Initial experience with the temporary Spur Stent System: DEEPER Trial first-in-man results Jihad A. Mustapha, MD, FACC,

DCB: What Is The Evidence?

Efficacy of DEB in Calcification and Subintimal Angioplasty

Transcription:

ILLUMENATE Pivotal Stellarex DCB IDE Study 12-Month Results Sean Lyden, MD On behalf of Co-PI Prakash Krishnan, MD and the ILLUMENATE Pivotal Investigators Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Ohio

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Affiliation/Financial Relationship Grant/Research Support Consulting Fees/Honoraria Other Financial Benefit Company Cook, Cordis, Gore, Endologix, Bolton, Silkroad, Trivascular, Medtronic, Spectranetics, Bard Spectranetics, Biomet, Endologix, TVA Medical VIVA Physicians Board Member

Background SFA disease remains a challenge to manage Current PTA results from DCB trials are associated with improved outcomes over OPC goals 1,2,3 Drug-coated balloons have improved patency over PTA in randomized trials 1,2 Severe calcium, diabetes, CKD, women and small vessels remain a problem for current technologies 4,5,6,7 1 N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):145-53 2 J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2329-38 3 Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 May 1;69(6):910-9 4 J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Oct;23(5):731-7 5 JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):923-33 6 J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1204-14 7 Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Aug;37(4):898-907

Study Device: Stellarex TM (Spectranetics) DCB EnduraCoat TM technology: Low dose paclitaxel, 2 µg/mm 2 Excipient: Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Proprietary open-folded coating technology Balloon catheter features: Catheter shaft designed for pushability Low 0.039 tip entry profile Flexible balloon and tip for tracking through tortuous anatomy CAUTION: Investigational device. Not for sale or distribution in the United States.

Stellarex Program: Sites & Investigators ILLUMENATE FIH 80 subjects enrolled 3 EU sites ILLUMENATE PK 25 subjects enrolled 2 NZ sites ILLUMENATE EU RCT 328 subjects enrolled 18 EU sites ILLUMENATE Global 371 subjects enrolled 37 EU & AUS/NZ sites ILLUMENATE Pivotal IDE 300 subjects enrolled 43 US & EU sites P. Faries, NY, USA C. Bosarge, FL, USA K. Niazi, GA, USA O. Rosales, TX, USA A. Jain, CA, USA M. Shishehbor, OH, USA R. Sachar, NC, USA G. Al-Khoury, PA, USA W. Bachinsky, PA, USA M. Goodwin, IL, USA J. Cardenas, AZ, USA J. Angle, VA, USA M. Werner, Vienna, Austria J. Park, TX, USA M. Brodmann, Graz, Austria M. Mewissen, WI, USA C. Mena-Hurtado, CT, USA E. Korngold, OR, USA J. Mustapha, MI, USA P. Desai, NC, USA J. Ricci, MI, USA M. Ghani, OK, USA M. Khuddus, FL, USA W. Miller, CO, USA W. Crowder, MS, USA C. Pollock, TN, USA M. Laiq Raja, TX, USA D. Paolini, OH, USA G. Ansel, OH, USA D. Fry, IA, USA C. Joels, TN, USA T. Gensler, VA, USA J. Sandhu, PA, USA R. Kovach, NJ, USA L. Lopez, IN, USA G. Schultz, SD, USA N. Farhat, OH, USA G. Mayeda, CA, USA E. Kang, GA, USA B. Katzen, FL, USA C. Metzger, TN, USA A. Nanjundappa, WV, USA J. Henretta, NC, USA

Trial Objective and Design Objective: Demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the Stellarex DCB vs. standard PTA for treatment of arterial disease in the SFA and/or popliteal arteries Stellarex DCB vs. PTA Multicenter prospective randomized trial Follow-up for 5 years Independent adjudication: Angiographic Core Laboratory 1 Duplex Ultrasound Core Laboratory 2 Screen Failure no Rutherford 2-4 Clinical Selection Criteria Successful Pre- Dilatation Pre-screening Clinical Events Committee Data Safety Monitoring Board Screening Monitoring with 100% source data verification Randomized 2:1 1.Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 2.VasCore, Boston, MA DCB Cohort (N=200) PTA Cohort (N=100)

Primary Endpoints Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days and freedom from target limb major amputation and clinically-driven TLR through 12 months Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Primary patency at 12 months, defined as freedom from target lesion restenosis (determined by duplex ultrasound PSVR 2.5) and freedom from clinically-driven TLR at 12 months

Key Eligibility Criteria Key Inclusion Criteria Rutherford class 2, 3 or 4 Lesion located in the SFA and/or popliteal Has at least one patent run-off vessel below-the-knee Lesion length 3-18 cm Key Exclusion Criteria Acute or sub-acute thrombus in target vessel Significant inflow disease In-stent restenosis Concentric calcification that precluded PTA pre-dilatation Use of adjunctive therapies (i.e. atherectomy or cutting/scoring balloons)

Baseline Characteristics ITT Data Set Stellarex PTA p Age (years) 68.3 ± 10.3 (200) 69.8 ± 9.8 (100) 0.225 Rutherford Clinical Category 0.735 2 31.5% (63/200) 35.0% (35/100) 3 64.5% (129/200) 60.0% (60/100) 4 4.0% (8/200) 5.0% (5/100) ABI 0.75±0.21 (193) 0.76± 0.2 (100) 0.508 Hypertension 93.5% (187/200) 94.0% (94/100) 0.867 Hyperlipidemia 88.0% (176/200) 90.0% (90/100) 0.606 Prior Coronary Revasc. 45.0% (90/200) 48.0% (48/100) 0.623

Baseline Characteristics ITT Data Set Stellarex PTA p Female 44% (88/200) 36% (36/100) 0.185 Diabetes 49.5% (99/200) 52.0% (52/100) 0.683 Renal Insufficiency 18.0% (36/200) 16.0% (16/100) 0.666 BMI 30 39.5% ( 79 /200) 30.0% (30/100) 0.107 Previous or Current Smoker 84.0% (168/200) 75.0% (75/100) 0.061

Baseline Core Lab Angiographic Data ITT Data Set Stellarex PTA p Lesion Length (cm) 8.0 ± 4.5 (199) 8.9 ± 4.6 (100) 0.105 Restenotic 1 9.5% (19/200) 18.0% (18/100) 0.035 Total Occlusion 19.0% (38/200) 18.0% (18/100) 0.834 Severe Calcification 43.9% (87/198) 43.0% (43/100) 0.877 Diameter Stenosis (%) 73.9 ± 16.9 (200) 74.8 ± 17.0 (100) 0.673 Reference Vessel Diameter (mm) 4.86 ± 0.92 (200) 5.15 ± 1.05 (100) 0.017 0-1 Patent Run-off Vessels 32.5% (54/166) 30.5% (25/82) 0.745 1. Site reported data

Procedural Characteristics Stellarex PTA p Pre-dilatation Performed 1 100% (200/200) 100% (100/100) N/A Study Device Inflation Time 1 (min/lesion) 3.9 ± 2.0 (200) 3.7 ± 2.3 (100) 0.557 Post-DCB/PTA Dissection 2 Grade D Grade E/F (Flow-limiting) 20.0% (40/200) 0.0% (0/193) 12.0% (12/100) 0.0% (0/98) 0.084 N/A Bail-out Stent Placement 1 6.0% (12/200) 6.0% (6/100) 1.000 Post-procedure Diameter Stenosis (%) 2 25.2 ± 11.7 (199) 27.4 ± 10.1 (100) 0.107 1. Site-reported data 2. Per Angiographic Core Lab

Primary Safety Endpoint ITT Data Set Superiority Endpoint Achieved Composite of freedom from device & procedure-related death through 30 days post-procedure and freedom from target limb major amputation and CD-TLR through 12 months post-procedure (410 days) Stellarex 1 : 92.1% (174/189) PTA 1 : 83.2% (79/95) Difference: [95%CI] 2 8.3% [0.03%, 16.57%] P=0.001 3 1 Data are based on complete data without multiple imputation and presented as % (n/n). 2 Estimate of the difference (DCB-PTA) and 95% CI are based on the model based estimates resulting from multiple-imputation of missing data. p-value is 1-sided for a non-inferiority margin of 5% (for DCB-PTA) and based on the model based estimates resulting from multiple-imputation of missing data. 3 Since non-inferiority of safety was met and additionally the lower bound of the 95% CI of the difference was greater than 0%, testing for superiority was conducted. The p-value for the superiority comparison was 0.0246, demonstrating superiority of the DCB group against the PTA group

Key Safety Outcomes ITT Data Set Stellarex PTA Difference [95% CI] 2 12-Month MAEs 1 9.4% (18/191) [18] 17.7% (17/96) [18] CV Death 1.6% (3/191) [3] 2.1% (2/96) [2] -8.3% [-17.0%, 0.4%] -0.5% [-3.9%, 2.8%] Target Limb Amputation 0.0% (0/189) [0] 0.0% (0/95) [0] N/A Clinically- Driven TLR 12-Month All- Cause Mortality 7.9% (15/189) [15] 16.8% (16/95) [16] 2.6% (5/192) 2.1% (2/96) -8.9% [-17.4%, -0.5%] 0.5% [-3.1%, 4.2%] 1. Numbers are % (n/n) [Events]- Denominator includes subjects with an event or those without an event having follow-up on or past the opening of the visit window. 2. Confidence interval of the difference is exact when the smallest expected cell count was less than 5. Otherwise the confidence interval of the difference is asymptotic.

CD-TLR 1 Free at 12 Months: 93.6% ITT Data Set * 91.0% @ day 410 80.0% @ day 410 DCB 93.6% @ day 365 PTA 87.3% @ day 365 1. Clinically-driven TLR defined as reintervention due to PSVR 2.5 (or >50% stenosis via angio) with an increase in the RCC >1 category or deterioration in the ABI by >0.15 compared to maximum early post-procedural level. Per subject analysis.

12 Month Primary Effectiveness Endpoint ITT Data Set Superiority Endpoint Achieved Absence of restenosis (Duplex PSVR 2.5) & freedom from CD-TLR through 12 months (410 days) Stellarex 1 : 76.3% (135/177) PTA 1 : 57.6% (53/92) Difference: [95% CI] 2 16.9% [5.1%, 28.7%] P=0.003 1 Data are based on complete data without multiple imputation and presented as % (n/n) 2 Estimate of the difference (DCB-PTA) and 95% CI are based on the model based estimates resulting from multipleimputation of missing data. p-value is 1-sided and based on the model based estimates resulting from multipleimputation of missing data

Key Secondary Endpoints ITT Data Set Similar outcomes at 12 months, with ~ 50% fewer re-interventions in the DCB arm. 1 Percent of Subjects with Improvements at 12 Months vs. Baseline Ankle-Brachial Index 75,8% 79,0% RCC Classification 88,3% 86,9% PTA Stellarex Walking Distance (6 MWT) 73,0% 73,8% 1. CD-TLR rate in the Stellarex arm = 7.9% vs. 16.8% in the PTA arm

Primary Patency at 12 Months ITT Data Set * 73.7% @ day 410 DCB 82.3% @ day 365 PTA 70.9% @ day 365 Δ23.3% 50.4% @ day 410 Primary patency is defined as freedom from restenosis (determined by duplex ultrasound PSVR threshold of 2.5) and freedom from clinically-driven TLR at 12 months. Assessed per lesion. KM estimates reported at day 410 to capture all patients and events within the full 320-410 follow-up window. Rates from the middle of the protocol visit window (365 days) reported for consistency and comparative purposes with other trials.

Data in Context with Core Lab* Adjudicated 12-Month Patency Rates 1 2 3 *VasCore (Boston, MA); PSVR: 2.5, KM estimates at day 365 (360 for IN.PACT SFA) 1. Brodmann M. Oral presentation. AMP Symposium, Chicago, IL, Aug 10, 2016 2. Laird JR et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:2329-38, P.Krishnan Oral Presentation. VIVA 2016 3. Rosenfield K, Jaff MR, White CJ, et al. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(2):145-153.

Conclusions Stellarex is a low-dose (2 µg/mm 2 ) DCB One of the most complex patient groups studied in DCB IDE trials Severe calcium 43.9%, diabetes 49.5%, 0-1 runoff 32.5% 12-Month DCB Primary Patency: 82.3% 12-Month DCB Freedom from CD-TLR: 93.6% Both primary safety and effectiveness endpoints demonstrated superiority of Stellarex over PTA Results reaffirm prior data ILLUMENATE FIH and EU Randomized Trial