Synopsis Style Clinical Study Report SR EFC10139 Version number: 1 (electronic 2.0)

Similar documents
SYNOPSIS 2/198 CSR_BDY-EFC5825-EN-E02. Name of company: TABULAR FORMAT (For National Authority Use only)

Full Novartis CTRD Results Template

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

Synopsis Style Clinical Study Report SAR ACT sarilumab Version number : 1 (electronic 1.0)

Synopsis Style Clinical Study Report SR EFC5826 Version number: 1 (electronic 2.0)

Clinical Trial Results Summary Study EN3409-BUP-305

Full Novartis CTRD Results Template

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Pasireotide. Therapeutic Area of Trial Cushing s disease. Protocol Number CSOM230B2208E1

23-Aug-2011 Lixisenatide (AVE0010) - EFC6014 Version number: 1 (electronic 1.0)

Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI.

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-525, NCT#

Previous Study Return to List Next Study

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Insulin Glargine. According to template: QSD VERSION N 4.0 (07-JUN-2012) Page 1

SYNOPSIS. Administration: subcutaneous injection Batch number(s):

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name. NA (not existing yet) Therapeutic Area of Trial Parkinson s Disease L-dopa induced dyskinesia

Study Number CAIN457C2302 (core study) and CAIN457C2302E1 (extension study)

Sponsor. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Generic Drug Name. Agomelatine Therapeutic Area of Trial. Major depressive disorder Approved Indication

BRL /RSD-101RLL/1/CPMS-716. Report Synopsis

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): AMARYL M (1/250 mg) / HOE490

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name AFQ056. Therapeutic Area of Trial L-dopa induced dyskinesias in Parkinson s disease (PD-LID)

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Search for studies: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective:

Nilotinib AEs (adverse events) in CML population:

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT Sponsor/company: Sanofi-Aventis. Date: 08/02/ 2008

SYNOPSIS. Abbreviated Clinical Study Report. Study Code: RIMON_L_01031 Document Status: Synopsis V 2.1 Date: 16-Oct Title of the study:

London, 07 August 2006 Product name: Keppra Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/277/II/63 SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

Study Phase Phase IIIb

Title A Phase II study of oral LBH589 in adult patients with refractory cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report CN138002: Addendum 1. Individual Study Table Referring to the Dossier

Clinical Study Synopsis

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

Summary ID#7029. Clinical Study Summary: Study F1D-MC-HGKQ

Study Center(s): The study was conducted at 39 study sites in Japan.

Summary ID# Clinical Study Summary: Study B4Z-MC-LYCL

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, parallel-group study.

ClinialTrials.gov Identifier: sanofi-aventis. Sponsor/company: 07/November/2008

Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

Efficacy Study of Zoledronic Acid and Teriparatide Combination Therapy in Women With Osteoporosis

Study Code: Date: 27 July 2007

Individual Study Table Referring to Item of the Submission: Volume: Page:

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Vildagliptin/Metformin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report IM Double-blind Period

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

Clinical Trial Results Posting

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Study No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

(For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug: to Part of Dossier:

ClinialTrials.gov Identifier: HOE901_4020 Insulin Glargine Date: Study Code: This was a multicenter study that was conducted at 59 US sites

MedDRA Basic Concept

B3D-MC-GHCY Clinical Study Report Synopsis Page 1Page GHCY Synopsis LY

NCT ClinialTrials.gov Identifier: sanofi-aventis. Sponsor/company: HMR3647A_4019. Study Code: Telithromycin. Generic drug name:

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: 10/11/2013. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT

Study No. 178-CL-008 Report Final Version, 14 Dec 2006 Reissued Version, 18 Jul 2011 Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. Page 13 of 122

Adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) with 2010/2011 seasonal influenza vaccines

Individual Study Table Referring to the Dossier SYNOPSIS. Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI424136

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Centocor Ortho Biotech Services, LLC

Clinical Trial Synopsis

FOI CAERS Reports Allegedly Related to Multiple Energy Drinks

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).

SYNOPSIS INDIVIDUAL STUDY TABLE REFERRING TO PART OF THE DOSSIER (FOR NATIONAL AUTHORITY USE ONLY) Volume: Page:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Clinical Study Synopsis

SYNOPSIS. Number of subjects: Planned: 22 Randomized: 23 Treated: 23. Evaluated: Pharmacodynamic: 22 Safety: 23 Pharmacokinetics: 22

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

BRL /RSD-101C0D/1/CPMS-704. Report Synopsis

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL , NCT#

SYNOPSIS. ER OROS Paliperidone: Clinical Study Report R SCH-301

SYNOPSIS. Study Coordinator. Study centre(s)

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Use only) Name of Finished Product:

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

PFIZER INC. Study Initiation Date and Completion Dates: 09 March 2000 to 09 August 2001.

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

Clinical Study Synopsis

Trial No.: RIS-USA-102 Clinical phase: III

2.0 Synopsis. ABT-711 M Clinical Study Report R&D/06/573. (For National Authority Use Only) to Part of Dossier: Volume:

BRL /RSD-101C0F/1/CPMS-716. Report Synopsis

Anne M. Calkins, 1 Joseph Shurman, 2 Mark Jaros, 3 Richard Kim, 4 Gwendoline Shang 4. New York Spine and Wellness Center, North Syracuse, NY; 2

Efficacy/pharmacodynamics: 85 Safety: 89

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

1.1. An overview of reports on agomelatine

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: Not Applicable

SCIENTIFIC STUDY REPORT

M0BCore Safety Profile. Active substance: Bromazepam Pharmaceutical form(s)/strength: Tablets 6 mg FR/H/PSUR/0066/001 Date of FAR:

Referring to Part IV of the Dossier

Supplementary Online Content

Transcription:

SYNOPSIS Title of the study: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, multinational study to assess the long-term effect, over 1 year, of rimonabant 10 mg in comparison with rimonabant 20 mg after an initial treatment period of 6 months with rimonabant 20 mg in overweight or obese patients (EFC10139) Investigators: Study centers: Publications (reference): None Study period: No Principal Investigator was planned or identified for this study The study was conducted at 31 centers in 5 countries (Croatia, Finland, Hungary, the Netherlands, and Romania). Date first patient enrolled: 22 April 2008 Date last patient completed: 26 February 2009 Phase of development: Phase 3b Objectives: The objectives of the protocol were as follows: Primary: To assess, over a period of 12 months (1 year), the effect on weight loss and weight maintenance of rimonabant 10 mg in comparison with rimonabant 20 mg in overweight/obese patients after an initial treatment period of 6 months with rimonabant 20 mg. Secondary: To assess the effect of rimonabant over a period of 12 months (1 year) on: waist circumference, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose, fasting insulin. To evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of rimonabant 10 mg and 20 mg over a period of 12 months followed by a 75-day posttreatment follow-up period (1 year + 75 days), after randomization, in overweight/obese patients. The study was stopped prematurely after 332 patients entered the run-in period, of whom only 3 patients had been randomized, due to the Sponsor s decision to discontinue the rimonabant development program. The monitoring therefore focused on a review of the safety profile, based on the reporting of adverse events. Given that only 3 patients were randomized for a maximum duration of 11 days, the primary analysis on weight change was not performed. As a result, the analysis (as defined in the statistical analysis plan) focused on the run-in rimonabant 20 mg treatment period and the results are presented through a synopsis-style report. Appendices attached to this synopsis-style report were chosen to provide the relevant information. Methodology: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 2-arm parallel group study, intending to compare rimonabant 10 mg with rimonabant 20 mg, following a 6-month open-label run-in rimonabant 20 mg treatment period. Number of patients: Planned: 522 (run-in); 444 (randomized) Run-in: 332 Randomized: 3 Treated: 331 Evaluated: Run-in exposed : 331 Diagnosis and criteria for inclusion: Male or female patients aged 18 years, with a body mass index (BMI) 30 kg/m², or BMI >27 kg/m² with associated risk factor(s) such as type 2 diabetes or dyslipidemia. Investigational product: Rimonabant 10 mg tablet Dose: 10 mg tablet once daily Administration: Oral (before breakfast) Batch number: Property of the sanofi-aventis group Page 1

Duration of treatment: Run-in period: 6 months; double-blind period: 12 months Duration of observation: Approximately 21.5 months (including a 1- to 2-week screening period, 6-month open-label runin period, 12-month double-blind treatment period, and 75-day posttreatment follow-up) Reference therapy: Rimonabant 20 mg tablet Dose: 20 mg tablet once daily Administration: Oral (before breakfast) Batch number: Criteria for evaluation: Efficacy: No analyses were performed on the primary efficacy variable (absolute change in body weight from baseline [randomization] to Month 12) as only 3 patients were randomized. Only the evolution of body weight (absolute value and change from the entry in the run-in period) was described over the run-in period with rimonabant 20 mg. Safety: Only adverse events were reviewed and described. Statistical methods: Efficacy: The evolution of body weight (absolute value and change from the entry in run-in period) was described by visit over the run-in period in the run-in population. The run-in population consists of patients who received an open run-in batch number at Visit 2 (based on enrollment process and recorded in the interactive voice randomization system [IVRS] database). Data included in this analysis up to Visit 7 (5 months of run-in) correspond to the evaluated patients at each visit. At Visit 8, data corresponded to either the evaluation at the discontinuation visit for run-in failure or at the randomization visit for the randomized patients. Safety: Adverse events were coded according to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 11.1 and summarized, using descriptive statistics, in the run-in and exposed population, which corresponds to patients exposed to the study medication (open run-in treatment or double-blind treatment), regardless of the amount of treatment administered. Summary: A summary of the study design is provided below, and a study flow-chart (per protocol amendment) is provided in Figure 1 after the synopsis. Summary of populations: Due to the low number of patients randomized in this study, only the run-in population is presented. Property of the sanofi-aventis group Page 3

Patient disposition: A total of 332 patients entered the run-in period, of them 331 received rimonabant 20 mg. None of the patients completed the study as planned. Most patients discontinued treatment as a result of the premature stop of the study and were counted in the category "other reason". Table 1 summarizes patient disposition including reasons for run-in discontinuation. Only 3 patients were randomized after the run-in period, all in the rimonabant 10 mg group, and discontinued as a result of the premature stop of the study. Table 1 - Summary of patients disposition end-of-treatment n (%) screened patients Screened patients (N=398) Screened failure patients 66 (16.6%) Reason for screen failure Inclusion/Exclusion criteria not respected 25 (6.3%) Adverse event 0 Subject's request 5 (1.3%) Poor compliance to protocol 0 Lost to follow-up 0 Other reason 36 (9.0%) Run-in patients 332 (83.4%) Run-in and exposed patients 331 (83.2%) Discontinued the open run-in period Reason for discontinuation Adverse event 33 (8.3%) Inclusion/Exclusion criteria not respected 3 (0.8%) Subject's request 7 (1.8%) Poor compliance to protocol 0 Lost to follow-up 0 Other reason 286 (71.9%) Non Randomized and treated with double-blind treatment 0 Randomized patients 3 (0.8%) Exposure: The run-in and exposed population included 331 patients exposed to at least 1 dose of rimonabant. Table 2 presents the global duration of study treatment regardless of the period (only run-in period for run-in patients and run-in plus double-blind periods for the randomized patients). The 3 randomized patients were exposed to rimonabant 10 mg during 3, 10, and 11 days, respectively. Given the short exposure to 10 mg and the long half-life of rimonabant (15 days), this dose was not assessed separately. The 3 randomized patients in the rimonabant 10 mg arm were analyzed as part of a unique rimonabant arm including all patients having received essentially 20 mg throughout the trial. Table 2 Summary of exposure to rimonabant - run-in and exposed population Cumulative exposure (patient years) 68.0 Extent of exposure (days) Mean (SD) 75.0 (57.1) Median 49.0 Min : Max 1 : 193 Count of patients [n(%)] 1-30 days 101 (30.5%) 31-60 days 78 (23.6%) 61-90 days 25 (7.6%) 91-120 days 28 (8.5%) 121-150 days 44 (13.3%) 151-180 days 50 (15.1%) 181 days 5 (1.5%) Note: Only run-in period for run-in patients and run-in and double-blind periods for randomized patients Property of the sanofi-aventis group Page 3

Demographics: Patient demographic characteristics are presented in Table 3. Table 3 - Summary of patient demographics at baseline - run-in population (N=332) Age (years) Number 332 Mean (SD) 51.8 (13.2) Median 54.0 Min : Max 18 : 78 [18-44] 104 (31.3%) [45-64] 169 (50.9%) 65 59 (17.8%) Gender, n(%) Number 332 Male 128 (38.6%) Female 204 (61.4%) Race, n(%) Number 332 Caucasian/White 324 (97.6%) Black 0 Asian/Oriental 4 (1.2%) Other 4 (1.2%) Waist circumference (cm) Mean (SD) 116.1 (13.8) Median 114.7 Min : Max 84 : 170 For men, n(%) 102 cm 8 (2.4%) > 102 cm 119 (35.8%) For women, n(%) 88 cm 4 (1.2%) > 88 cm 200 (60.2%) Height (cm) Mean (SD) 169.1 (9.9) Median 168.0 Min : Max 141 : 198 Weight (kg) Mean (SD) 105.9 (21.2) Median 102.4 Min : Max 69 : 228 BMI (kg/m 2 ) Mean (SD) 36.9 (5.8) Median 35.9 Min : Max 27 : 60 < 27 0 [27-30[ 18 (5.4%) [30-35[ 120 (36.1%) [35-40[ 113 (34.0%) 40 80 (24.1%) Property of the sanofi-aventis group Page 4

Efficacy results: Weight constantly decreased from baseline over time, with a mean weight loss of 7.16 kg in patients who completed the fifth month of treatment. At the last visit of the run-in period (ie, Visit 8, which corresponds to the end-of-treatment visit regardless of the time of investigational product discontinuation), a mean weight loss of 4.31 kg was observed. Results are provided in the CSR Appendix. Safety results: Overview of adverse events The incidences of patients with at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the run-in period are presented in Table 4. There was 1 death. Table 4 - Overview of TEAEs - run-in and exposed population Patients with any TEAE 174 (52.6%) Patients with any serious TEAE 12 (3.6%) Patients with any TEAE leading to death 1 (0.3%) Patients with TEAE leading to permanent treatment discontinuation 32 (9.7%) Notes: TEAE: Treatment Emergent Adverse Event TEAE includes all AEs with an onset date during treatment period and up to 75 days following the last study drug intake Summary of treatment-emergent adverse events Treatment-emergent adverse events reported in at least 5% of run-in and exposed patients are presented in Table 5. All TEAEs are presented by system organ class (SOC), high level group term (HLGT), high level term (HLT), and preferred term (PT) in the CSR Appendix. Table 5 - Number (%) of patients experiencing at least 1 TEAE (cut-off: incidence 5%) by SOC and PT - run-in and exposed population Primary System Organ Class Preferred term Any Class 174 (52.6%) Infections and infestations 68 (20.5%) Nasopharyngitis 27 (8.2%) Gastrointestinal disorders 66 (19.9%) Nausea 35 (10.6%) Diarrhoea 20 (6.0%) Nervous system disorders 63 (19.0%) Dizziness 24 (7.3%) Headache 22 (6.6%) General disorders and administration site conditions 41 (12.4%) Irritability 19 (5.7%) Notes: TEAE: Treatment Emergent Adverse Event TEAE includes all AEs with an onset date during treatment period and up to 75 days following the last study drug intake n(%) = number and percentage of patients with at least one treatment emergent adverse event. MedDRA version 11.1 Table sorted by decreasing incidence of Primary SOC and PT within SOC. In case of equal frequency regarding SOC, alphabetical order is used. Summary of serious adverse events Twelve of 331 run-in and exposed patients experienced serious TEAEs during this study (Table 6). Two patients experienced suicidal ideation on treatment, which were reported by convention as serious adverse events. No suicidal behavior was reported. Please refer to the CSR Appendix for details presented as narratives. Results of the Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) are presented in the CSR Appendix and case report form pages for patients with a positive C-SSRS are provided in the CSR Appendix. Property of the sanofi-aventis group Page 5

Table 6 - Number (%) of patients experiencing at least 1 serious TEAE by SOC and PT - run-in and exposed population Primary System Organ Class Preferred term Any Class 12 (3.6%) Infections and infestations 1 (0.3%) Pneumonia 1 (0.3%) Gastrointestinal disorders 1 (0.3%) Dyspepsia 1 (0.3%) Nervous system disorders 3 (0.9%) Tremor 1 (0.3%) Epilepsy 1 (0.3%) Transient ischaemic attack 1 (0.3%) Psychiatric disorders 3 (0.9%) Aggression 1 (0.3%) Suicidal ideation 2 (0.6%) Hypomania 1 (0.3%) Major depression 1 (0.3%) Injury, poisoning and procedural complications 2 (0.6%) Road traffic accident 1 (0.3%) Carbon monoxide poisoning 1 (0.3%) Lower limb fracture 1 (0.3%) Metabolism and nutrition disorders 1 (0.3%) Diabetes mellitus 1 (0.3%) Cardiac disorders 1 (0.3%) Myocardial ischaemia 1 (0.3%) Hepatobiliary disorders 1 (0.3%) Cholecystitis acute 1 (0.3%) Notes: TEAE: Treatment Emergent Adverse Event TEAE includes all AEs with an onset date during treatment period and up to 75 days following the last study drug intake n(%) = number and percentage of patients with at least one treatment emergent adverse event. MedDRA version 11.1 Table sorted by decreasing incidence of Primary SOC and PT within SOC for all TEAEs. In case of equal frequency regarding SOC, alphabetical order is used. Summary of deaths One patient died following accidental carbon monoxide poisoning about 10 weeks after discontinuation of the investigational product. Details are presented in a narrative in the CSR Appendix. Summary of treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation Discontinuation of treatment due to TEAEs occurred in 32 patients (9.7%) of the run-in and exposed population. Table 7 summarizes these events by SOC and PT. Property of the sanofi-aventis group Page 6

Table 7 - Number (%) of patients experiencing at least 1 TEAE leading to permanent treatment discontinuation by SOC and PT - run-in and exposed population Primary System Organ Class Preferred term Any Class 32 (9.7%) Gastrointestinal disorders 7 (2.1%) Nausea 1 (0.3%) Diarrhoea 3 (0.9%) Vomiting 3 (0.9%) Dyspepsia 2 (0.6%) Nervous system disorders 12 (3.6%) Dizziness 5 (1.5%) Memory impairment 3 (0.9%) Disturbance in attention 2 (0.6%) Hypoaesthesia 3 (0.9%) Aphasia 2 (0.6%) Dyskinesia 1 (0.3%) Tremor 2 (0.6%) Epilepsy 1 (0.3%) Poor quality sleep 1 (0.3%) Syncope 1 (0.3%) Psychiatric disorders 21 (6.3%) Depressed mood 8 (2.4%) Insomnia 5 (1.5%) Anxiety 1 (0.3%) Decreased interest 3 (0.9%) Aggression 4 (1.2%) Nightmare 3 (0.9%) Stress 2 (0.6%) Agitation 1 (0.3%) Tension 1 (0.3%) Panic attack 1 (0.3%) Suicidal ideation 1 (0.3%) Burnout syndrome 1 (0.3%) Mental status changes 1 (0.3%) Nervousness 1 (0.3%) Restlessness 1 (0.3%) Sleep disorder 1 (0.3%) Violence-related symptom 1 (0.3%) General disorders and administration site conditions 11 (3.3%) Irritability 6 (1.8%) Fatigue 4 (1.2%) Asthenia 2 (0.6%) Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders 2 (0.6%) Muscle twitching 2 (0.6%) Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders 1 (0.3%) Hypoaesthesia facial 1 (0.3%) Vascular disorders 1 (0.3%) Flushing 1 (0.3%) Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders 1 (0.3%) Cough 1 (0.3%) Notes: TEAE: Treatment Emergent Adverse Event TEAE includes all AEs with an onset date during treatment period and up to 75 days following the last study drug intake n(%) = number and percentage of patients with at least one treatment emergent adverse event. MedDRA version 11.1 Table sorted by decreasing incidence of Primary SOC and PT within SOC for all TEAEs. In case of equal frequency regarding SOC, alphabetical order is used. Property of the sanofi-aventis group Page 7

Conclusions: Date of report: Property of the sanofi-aventis group Page 8