Optimal ltherapy in non 1 genotypes:

Similar documents
Personalizzazione della Cura in Epatologia. Epatite Cronica C: Pazienti con Genotipo 2

29th Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board Meeting

Tratamiento de la Hepatitis C Rafael Esteban Hospital General Universitario Valle de Hebrón Barcelona

How to optimize current therapy for GT1 patients Shortened therapy with IFNa-based therapy

ةي : لآا ةرقبلا ةروس

Hepatitis C: Management of Previous Non-responders with First Line Protease Inhibitors

Protease inhibitor based triple therapy in treatment experienced patients

Review Optimizing outcomes in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 or 3

HEPATITIS C TREATMENT GUIDANCE

Treating HCV Genotype 2 & 3

MEDIC CENTER. Case 2

Management of CHC G1 patients who are relapsers or non-responders to Peg IFN and RBV therapy: Wait or Triple Therapy?

Clinical Сase A previously relapse to PEG IFN + RBV in HCV G3a patient. Konstantin Zhdanov

Hepatitis C Therapy Falk Symposium September 20, 2008

SAVINO BRUNO, MD Director Internal Medicine and Hepatology Unit AO Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milano

Should Elderly CHC Patients (>70 years old) be Treated?

47 th Annual Meeting AISF

Clinical Cases Hepatitis C Naïve Patients. Rafael Esteban Liver Unit. Hospital General Universitari Vall Hebron. Barcelona.

Optimal Treatment with Boceprevir. Michael Manns

HCV-G3: Sofosbuvir with ledipasvir or daclatasvir?

Genotype 4. Sanaa Kamal, M.D., Ph.D. Professor. Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt Tufts School of Medicine

ASSAYS UTILZIED TO MONITOR HCV AND ITS TREATMENT

Pharmacological management of viruses in obese patients

Case 4: A 61-year-old man with HCV genotype 3 with cirrhosis. Ira M. Jacobson, M.D. Weill Cornell Medical College New York, New York USA

Antiviral treatment in HCV cirrhotic patients on waiting list

How do you optimize HCV Treatment for Cirrhotic Patients APASL STC Cebu

HIV HCV Co Infection Case: The Agnostic Radiologist

Hepatitis C Treatment

Therapy of Hepatitis C. Adrian M. Di Bisceglie

Hepatitis C: Management of Treatment Naïve Patients with First Line Protease Inhibitors

Dr. Siddharth Srivastava

Interferon free therapy Are we getting there? Graham R Foster Queen Marys University of London

5/12/2016. Learning Objectives. Management of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2 or 3 Infected Treatment-Naive or Experienced Patients

Treatement Experienced patients without cirrhosis. Rafael Esteban Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona

Phase 3. Treatment Experienced. Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2. Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:

Pretreatment assessment of Chronic Hepatitis C and Compensated Cirrhosis and Indications for Therapy

Predictors of Response to Hepatitis C Therapy in the DAA Era. Pablo Barreiro Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas Hospital Carlos III, Madrid

VII CURSO AVANCES EN INFECCIÓN VIH Y HEPATITIS VIRALES

SYNOPSIS Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI444031

Approved regimens for cirrhotic patients

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in drug-naïve patients

Personalised Treatment with Telaprevir in Graham R Foster Professor of Hepatology Queen Marys University of London

Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-1 Trial

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Cirrhotic Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 EXPEDITION-1

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2

Recent Management of Chronic Hepatitis C

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 early responders with 36 week pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy

New Therapies on the Horizon in Hepatitis C Patients Paul Y. Kwo, MD

HCV In 2015: Maximizing SVR

Hepatitis C Treatment 2014

ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO TREATMENT DO WE NEED IL28B TESTING?

CURRENT TREATMENTS. Mitchell L Shiffman, MD Director Liver Institute of Virginia. Richmond and Newport News, VA, USA

Virological Tools and Monitoring in the DAA Era

The time factor in the management of chronic hepatitis C

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B 2013 update

Associate Professor of Medicine University of Chicago

Current Treatments for HCV

CASE STUDY. Adverse Events in treatment chronic hepatitis C patients with PegInterferon and Ribavirin What would your management decision be?

Latest Treatment Updates for GT 2 and GT 3 Patients

Triple therapy with telaprevir or boceprevir: management of side effects

Updates on Current Status of HCV Therapy

Need to Assess HCV Resistance to DAAs: Is it Useful and When?

Why make this statement?

Treatment Options in HCV Relapsers and Nonresponders. Raymond T. Chung, M.D.

TREATMENT OF GENOTYPE 2

Antiviral agents in HCV

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV co-infected patients

How to optimize treatment for HCV Genotype 4

Hepatitis B: is there still a role for interferon?

What is the Optimized Treatment Duration? To Overtreat versus Undertreat. Nancy Reau, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Chicago

Treatment strategies for recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation (from Kyushu University experience)

Anemia as a predictor of response to antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C

Case #1. Case #1. Case #1: Audience vote VS. The Great Debate: When to Treat HCV in our HIV coinfected patients

HCV Case Study. Treat Now or Wait for New Therapies

Future strategies with new DAAs

TECHNICAL SUMMARY OF RESULTS

How to optimize treatment in G3 patients? Jérôme GOURNAY, MD Hépatologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes France

V.G. Bain, P. Marotta, K. Kaita, E. Yoshida, M. Swain, R. Bailey, A. Neumann, P. Cronin, J. McHutchison, E. Pulkstenis, M.

1. SYNOPSIS. AWB-ML21645 Date: April 20, 2016 Title of the observational study

Expert opinion on the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C

Worldwide Causes of HCC

Hepatitis C in HIV Patients: The Speeding Sidecar. Andrew Desruisseau, MD,MSCI Assistant Professor Meharry Medical College

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 2)

How to use pegylated Interferon for Chronic Hepatitis B in 2015

Strategies towards cure of HCV infection: a personalized approach. Heiner Wedemeyer Hannover Medical School Hannover, Germany

Delta hepatitis: How to manage and optimize therapy? Dominique ROULOT Unité d Hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne

Treatment of genotype 4 patient. with cirrhosis. Vincent LEROY Clinique Universitaire d Hépato-Gastroentérologie INSERM U823 CHU de Grenoble

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 2)

Efficacy and safety of protease inhibitors for sever hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation: a first multicentric experience

Pierluigi Toniutto Clinica di Medicina Interna Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Udine

Management of HCV Tawesak Tanwandee

Case 2: A 71-year-old man with cirrhosis

Worldwide Causes of HCC

ABCs of Hepatitis C: What s New. The Long-Awaited New Era: Protease Inhibitors for HCV Genotype 1

DAAs in the era of decompensated liver disease. Piero L. Almasio University of Palermo

doi: /j x

Genetic Determinants in HCV

Treatments of Genotype 2, 3,and 4: Now and in the future

EASL 2013 Interferon Free, All Oral Regimens for Hepatitis C. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

Transcription:

Optimal ltherapy in non 1 genotypes: genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì GI & Liver Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S. University of Palermo, Italy craxanto@unipa.it

Peg IFN alpha plus ribavirin : SVR rate of >80% in genotype 2/3 24 week treatment duration Peg IFN 2b (12KD) + RBV Peg IFN 2a (40KD) + ribavirin SVR (% %) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 n= 81% 76% 224 70 2004 2005 Zeuzem 4 Mangia 5 SVR (%) 100 95% 90 84% 80% 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 n= 96 71 100 0 2004 2004 2006 Hadziyannis 1 Von Yu 3 Wagner* 2 *Patients had undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 1. Hadziyannis S, et al. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 346 2. Von Wagner M, et al. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 522 3. Yu M L, et al. Gut 2007; 56: 553 4. Zeuzem S, et al. J Hepatol 2004; 40: 993 5. Mangia A, et al. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2609

SVR rates to PEG IFN alfa plus ribavirin for HCV genotypes 2and 3 Genotype 2 (n=258) Genotype 3 (n=374) RBV 800 RBV 1,000 RBV 800 RBV 1,000 mg/day 1,200 mg/day mg/day 1,200 mg/day 24 wks 24 wks 48 wks 48 wks Rizzetto M et al. Hepatology 2004;40(Suppl 1):252A.

SVR and relapse rates in HCV genotypes 2 and 3 according to viral lload Peg IFN 2b 1.5 g/kg/wk g + RBV 800 1400 mg/day x 24 Weeks Genotype 2 Genotype 3 LVL HVL LVL HVL ( 600,000) 000) (>600,000) 000) ( 600,000) 000) (>600,000) 000) Genotype 2 vs genotype 3 P=0.020 Zeuzem S et al. Hepatology 2004;40:993 999.

Peg IFN plus ribavirin : SVR rates of pivotal trials are reproduced in real life studies SVR (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 84% Real world data (EAP & PMS) Canada 1 Germany 3 Spain 2 85% 72% 76% 67% 65% G2: G3: n= 96 91 357 2581 1624 957 Genotype 2 or 3 Italy 4 1. Deschênes M, et al. 42nd EASL 2007; Abstract 615 (Poster) 2. Diago M, et al. 41st EASL 2006; Abstract 567 3. Zehnter E, et al. 56th AASLD 2005; Abstract 1233 4. PROBE study, Roche data on file, manuscript in preparation

SVR to SoC HCV treatment in U.S. Veterans Retrospective observational cohort study in 121 Department of V. A. facilities Patients: 5944 treated since October 2003 with Peg IFN 2a or Peg IFN 2b + Rbv SVR Rates Peg-IFN 2a Peg-IFN 2b ALL HCV-2 53% 52% 52% HCV-3 52% ^ 38% 43% Backus LI et al, Hepatology 2007;46:37 47

Naples study: SVR rates with PEG IFN alfa 2a and PEG IFN alfa 2b in patients with HCV G2/G3 Peg IFN 2a Peg IFN 2b SVR (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 p=0.046 88.1% 74.6% 67 pts 67 pts Ascione A et al Gastroenterology 2010;138:116 122

MIST study: SVR rates with PEG IFN alfa 2a and PEG IFN alfa 2b in patients with HCV G2 and G3 Peg IFN 2a p=0.01 Peg IFN 2b p=0.8 100 96% SVR (%) 80 60 82% 65% 69% 40 20 0 69 pts 74 pts 34 pts 32 pts Genotype 2 Genotype 3 Rumi MG, et al Gastroenterology 2010;138:108 115

PROBE real life study: SVR rates with PEG IFN alfa 2a and PEG IFN alfa 2b in patients with HCV G2/G3 Peg IFN 2a Peg IFN 2b SVR (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 p= n.s 72.8% 72.7% 1602 pts 818 pts PROBE study, Roche data on file, manuscript in preparation

Rapid Virological Response (RVR) as predictor of SVR: Subanalysis of 3 Phase III trials Virological Response G2 (n=395) G3 (n=426) RVR (< 50 IU/mL) 71% 60% EVR (< 50 IU/mL) 24% 29% pevr ( 2 log 10 drop) 1% 3% SVR 77% 68% SVR in patients with RVR 86% 86% SVR in patients with cevr* 61% 54% SVR in patients with pevr - - * Not tincluding RVR; not including RVR or cevr Fried MW, et al EASL 2008 April 23 27, 2008 Milan, Italy ABS#7

RVR to SoC in patients with HCV genotype 2or 3 Treatment: 180 g Peg IFN 2a once weekly + 800 mg RBV daily Shiffman ML et al. N Engl J Med 2007;357:124 134.

PROBE real life study: RVR rates in patients with ihhcv G2 and G3 100 RVR (%) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 76.8% 863 pts Genotype 2 + 3 79.5% 69.2% 551 pts 312 pts Genotype 2 Genotype 3 PROBE study, Roche data on file, manuscript in preparation

On treatment early responses of HCV G2 and G3 in a real lifestudy lif 100 RVR cevr pevr 80 73 66 Patients (% %) 60 40 20 11 7 17 11 0 G2 (n=740) G3 (n=940) Ribavirin prescribed with either Peg IFN 2a or Peg IFN 2b in accordance with local label Ferenci P, et al. EASL 2010; poster 256

ACCELERATE: Treatment duration and outcomes Patients (% %) 100 80 60 40 20 1469 treatment naïve Gt 2/3 patients with elevated ALT, HCV RNA >600 IU/mL, and compensated disease p <.001 62 70 31 16 wk (n = 732) 24 wk (n = 733) 18 SVR ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ITT, intention to treat. Modified ITT Relapse Shiffman ML et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:124 34.

RVR and Short Therapy in G2 Patients Study Type Randomization Patients RVR SVR in pts with RVR SVR in pts with RVR Therapy and short therapy and standard therapy Dalgard 2004 Randomized RVR 14 weeks No RVR 24 weeks 23 91% 90.4% 50% (1/2) PEGIFN α2b 1.5 RBV 800/1400 Mangia 2005 Randomized Standard group : 24 weeks 213 64% 87% 89% PEGIFN α2b 1.0 RBV 1000/1200 Variable group: RVR 12 weeks NO RVR 24 weeks Von Wagner 2005 Randomized RVR 16 weeks 38 97% 94% 94% PEGIFN α2a RBV 24 weeks 1000/1200 Shiffman 2007 Randomized 16 weeks 24 weeks 728 69.2% 78% 85% PEGIFN α2a RBV 800 Yu 2007 Randomized 16 weeks 24 weeks 150 86.6% 100% 98% PEGIFN α2a RBV 1000/1200 Dalgard 2008 Randomized RVR 14 weeks 24 weeks 85 75% 93% 97% PEGIFN α2b 1.5 RBV 800/1400 Lagging 2008 Randomized 12 weeks 24 weeks 104 N.A. N.A. N.A. PEGIFN α2a RBV 800 Mecenate 2010 Randomized RVR 12 weeks 24 weeks 116 79% N.A. N.A. PEGIFN α2a RBV 800/1200 Low baseline viral load, absence of advanced fibrosis, younger age and absence of obesity are associated with SVR in G2 patients with RVR

RVR and Short Therapy in G3 Patients Pti t Study Type Randomization Patients RVR SVR in pts with RVR SVR in pts with RVR Therapy and short therapy and standard therapy Mangia 2005 Randomized Standard group : 24 weeks Variable group: 70 59% 77% 100% PEGIFN α2b 1.0 RBV 1000/1200 RVR 12 weeks NO RVR 24 weeks Dalgard 2004 Randomized RVR 14 weeks No RVR 24 weeks 99 74.7% 89% 56% PEGIFN α2b 1.5 RBV Von Wagner2005 Randomized RVR 16 weeks 24 weeks 800/1400 113 91% 76.4% 75% PEGIFN α2a RBV 1000/1200 Shiffman 2007 Randomized 16 weeks 24 weeks 726 61.8% 80% 85% PEGIFN α2a RBV 800 Dalgard 2008 Randomized RVR 14 weeks 343 70.3% 84% 92% PEGIFN α2b 24 weeks 1.5 RBV 800/1400 Lagging 2008 Randomized 12 weeks 24 weeks 276 N.A. N.A. N.A. PEGIFN α2a RBV 800 Mecenate 2010 Randomized RVR 12 weeks 94 68.1% N.A. N.A. PEGIFN α2a 24 weeks RBV 800/1200 Low baseline viral load, absence of advanced fibrosis, younger age and absence of obesity are associated with SVR in G3 patients with RVR

Heterogeneity of short therapy studies in HCV G2/3 Design No. PegIFN + Rbv Duration RVR (LOD) Allocation by RVR Dalgard 2004 122 alfa2b + wb 14 w 78% (50 IU) Mangia 2005 283 alfa2b 1.0 + wb 12 w 63% (50 IU) Randomization by RVR von Wagner 2005 153 alfa2a + wb 16 w 93% (600 IU) Dalgard 2008 428 alfa2b + wb 14 w 71% (50 IU) Baseline Randomization Shiffman 2007 1469 alfa2a + 800 mg 16 w 65% (50 IU) Yu 2007 150 alfa2a + wb 16 w 87% (50IU) Lagging 2008 382 alfa2a + 800 mg 12 w 60% (15 IU)

Heterogeneity of short therapy studies in HCV G2/3 Mangia Shiffman Yu Lagging Mean weigth (kg) 69.4 81.6 65.8 78 Ribavirin (mg/day) 1,000-1,200 1 800 1,000-1,200 1 800 Ribavirin (mg/kg) ~14.4 ~9.8 ~15.2 ~10.3 Relapse rate: (%) 8.9 vs 3.6 31 vs 18 6 vs 3.1 33 vs 12 Withdrawals: no. (%) 9 (3.2) 132 (9.0) 1 (0.7) 22 (5.8)

The role of RVR in choosing treatment duration for HCV G2 and G3 24 week WBD RBV 14 16 week WBD RBV 24 week FD RBV 14 16 week 16 FD RBV PPV NPV 100 95.4 95.5 100 ictive value (%) Po ositive predi 90 80 70 60 85.0 86.8 77.8 84.3 (%) 85.4 73.8 73.5 75 80.4 Ne egative pred dictive value 60.7 47.0 46.9 50 42.9 26.7 25 50 25 Genotype 2 Genotype 3 Genotype 2 Genotype 3 0.0 Poordad Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:1251 1267

PROBE real life study: SVR rates in patients with HCV G2 and G3 according to BMI SVR (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 79.9% 73.2% 757 pts 867 pts 64.7% 64.3% 590 pts 367 pts BMI < 25 BMI 25 BMI < 25 BMI 25 Genotype 2 Genotype 3 PROBE study, Roche data on file, manuscript in preparation

SVR rates according to ribavirin dosage in 673 patients with HCV Genotype 2 and 3 wk 4 R wk 4 NR n = 473 n = 200 % % 269/356 19/22 110/169 23/30 mg/kg mg/kg Mangia & Andriulli, EASL 2009

Non RVR G 2 and G 3 patients: decreased relapse with 48 weeks treatment, weight based RBV Retrospective analysis of G 2/3 patients from two PEG IFNα 2a pivotal trials Non RV VR Patien nts (%) 100 24 wk, 800 mg* 24 wk, 1000/1200 mg* 80 76 48 wk, 800 mg* 67 65 67 48 wk, 1000/1200 mg* 60 40 20 0 *RBV + PEG IFNα 2a. RVR=HCV RNA < 50 IU/mL at week 4 n = 21 34 30 37 19 29 23 27 SVR (ITT) Willems B jet al J Hepatol 2007;46:S6 Abstract 8 26 24 13 Relapse 7 1. Hadziyannis S, et al. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 346 2. Fried M, et al. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 975

PROBE real life study: SVR rates in patients with HCV G2 and G3 according to stage of fibrosis 100 90 80 70 77.5% 72.6% 69.4% SVR (%) 60 50 40 50% 30 20 10 0 454 pts 84 pts F0 F2 F3 F4 278 pts 62 pts F0 F2 F3 F4 Genotype 2 Genotype 3 PROBE study, Roche data on file, manuscript in preparation

Treatment of cirrhosis (Child Pugh A5 B7) due to HCV genotypes 2 or 3 with ihsoc* Genotype 2 Genotype 3 P value (41 pts) (18 pts) Age* 59.6±7.8 43.4± 6.4 < 0.001 Sex (M) 25(61.0%) 16(88.9%) 0.032 Body weight (Kg) 73.9 ± 14.5 78.3 ± 13.4 n.s. AST* 116.0 ± 60.0 164.0 ± 102.0 0.038 ALT* 144.0 ± 68.0 232.0 ± 136.0 0.002 PLT* 105.8 ± 42.8 117.3 ± 54.2 ns n.s. AP% 85.5± 21.8 86.5 ± 15.6 n.s. Bilirubin* 0.95 ± 0.43 0.92 ± 0.35 n.s. Albumin* 4.0 ± 0.5 4.2 ± 0.4 n.s. Oesophageal varices 18 (43.9%) 8 (44.4%) n.s. * PEG IFN alfa.2b 1,5 µg/wk plus ribavirin 800 1,400 mg/day for 48 weeks Di Marco and Craxì, unpublished data

Treatment of cirrhosis (Child Pugh A5 B7) due to HCV genotypes 2 or 3 with ihsoc* Genotype 2 Genotype 3 (41 pts) (18 pts) P value RVR 26 (63.4%) 14 (77.8%) n.s. EVR 34 (82.9%) 17 (94.4%) n.s. ETR 32 (78.0%) 16 (88.9%) n.s. SVR 25 (61.0%) 10 (55.6%) n.s. * PEG IFN alfa.2b 1,5 µg/wk plus ribavirin 800 1,400 mg/day for 48 weeks Di Marco and Craxì, unpublished data

IL28B polymorphism and treatment outcome GT1 GT2/3 GT4 SVR, % T/T T/C C/C T/T T/C C/C T/T T/C C/C Stättermayer et al, CGH 2010, e pub

IL28b genotype in HCV G 2/3 patients: predictability of SVR according to RVR Mangia et al., Gastroenterology 2010

Role of IL28B polymorphisms in the treatment of HCV genotype 2 infection in Asian patients rs8105790, rs8099917, rs4803219, and rs10853728 assessed as candidate SNPs in 482 Asian HCV G2 patients treated with SoC Patients with the rs8099917 TT genotype, in comparison with patients with GT/GG genotypes, had a significantly higher rate of RVR (85.2% versus 72.0%, P 5 0.017) 017) but not of SVR (89.4% versus 86.0%) Yu ml, et al HEPATOLOGY 2011;53:7 13

IL28b genotype in HIV/HCV G3 patients: predictabilityof SVR Pineda et al., Clin Infect Diseases 2010

Telaprevir in genotypes 2 and 3 (C209) Gt 2 (n=23) Gt 3 (n=29) 0 og Reduct ion CV RNA Lo Day 15 HC 1 2 3 4 5 3.7 0.54 4.83 4.85 4.72 6 5.5 T T/P/R P/R P, Peg IFNα 2a 180 μg/wk; R, ribavirin 800 mg/d; T, telaprevir q8h.. Foster G et al. EASL 2010, abs, 57

HCV RNA Week 0 Response guided therapy in patients with genotypes 2 and 3 4 12 Neg (RVR) pos pos, <2 log drop (NR or PR) stop Rx pos >2 log drop (DVR) Neg Risk factors (EVR) (fibrosis, IR) 12 16 weeks of therapy* 24 weeks of therapy 48 weeks of therapy *marginally less effective due to higher relapse rates, especially for G3 with high viral load

EASL HCV CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES