IMPLEMENTING NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING IN A PATHOLOGY LABORATORY

Similar documents
Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR ) Study. February 2018

Liquid biopsy: the experience of real life case studies

SureSelect Cancer All-In-One Custom and Catalog NGS Assays

Carga mutacional tumoral como biomarcador predictivo en el contexto de la inmuno-oncología

Oncomine Focus assay panel and Oncomine Knowledgebase Reporter.

Jennifer Hauenstein Oncology Cytogenetics Emory University Hospital Atlanta, GA

Illumina s Cancer Research Portfolio and Dedicated Workflows

Dr David Guttery Senior PDRA Dept. of Cancer Studies and CRUK Leicester Centre University of Leicester

MET skipping mutation, EGFR

Personalised cancer care Information for Medical Specialists. A new way to unlock treatment options for your patients

Frequency(%) KRAS G12 KRAS G13 KRAS A146 KRAS Q61 KRAS K117N PIK3CA H1047 PIK3CA E545 PIK3CA E542K PIK3CA Q546. EGFR exon19 NFS-indel EGFR L858R

Clinical Grade Genomic Profiling: The Time Has Come

Fluxion Biosciences and Swift Biosciences Somatic variant detection from liquid biopsy samples using targeted NGS

APPLICATIONS OF NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING IN SOLID TUMORS - PATHOLOGIST PROSPECTIVE

Next Generation Sequencing in Clinical Practice: Impact on Therapeutic Decision Making

What is the status of the technologies of "precision medicine?

The linking of specific cancer genetic alterations to molecular targeted therapies is driving a new era of personalised medicine

Accel-Amplicon Panels

The Center for PERSONALIZED DIAGNOSTICS

Illumina Trusight Myeloid Panel validation A R FHAN R A FIQ

Clinically Useful Next Generation Sequencing and Molecular Testing in Gliomas MacLean P. Nasrallah, MD PhD

EXAMPLE. - Potentially responsive to PI3K/mTOR and MEK combination therapy or mtor/mek and PKC combination therapy. ratio (%)

IntelliGENSM. Integrated Oncology is making next generation sequencing faster and more accessible to the oncology community.

Next generation histopathological diagnosis for precision medicine in solid cancers

5 th July 2016 ACGS Dr Michelle Wood Laboratory Genetics, Cardiff

Genomic Medicine: What every pathologist needs to know

Plasma-Seq conducted with blood from male individuals without cancer.

Click to edit Master /tle style

Clinical Grade Biomarkers in the Genomic Era Observations & Challenges

Predictive biomarker profiling of > 1,900 sarcomas: Identification of potential novel treatment modalities

Transform genomic data into real-life results

Enabling Personalized

Select analysis on the next pages. Sample request and sending address see last page. Institut für Pathologie und Molekularpathologie

Jocelyn Chapman, MD Division of Gynecologic Oncology. Julie S. Mak, MS, MSc Genetic Counselor Hereditary Cancer Clinic

Secuenciación masiva: papel en la toma de decisiones

Diagnostica Molecolare!

Tumor mutational burden and its transition towards the clinic

Out-Patient Billing CPT Codes

Next generation diagnostics Bringing high-throughput sequencing into clinical application

Identification and clinical detection of genetic alterations of pre-neoplastic lesions Time for the PML ome? David Sidransky MD Johns Hopkins

Detecting Oncogenic Mutations in Whole Blood

Dr Yvonne Wallis Consultant Clinical Scientist West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory

Patricia Aoun MD, MPH Professor and Vice-Chair for Clinical Affairs Medical Director, Clinical Laboratories Department of Pathology City of Hope

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

August 17, Dear Valued Client:

Evolución Clonal de los Tumores y Biopsia Líquida en Cáncer de Pulmón

Pathologists role Ancillary Studies in Cytology Challenges. Pre-analytical issues. LUNG CYTOLOGY Predictive markers and molecular tests

Liquid biopsy in lung cancer: The EGFR paradigm

Karl Kashofer, Phd Institut für Pathologie Medizinische Universität Graz

Precision Oncology: Experience at UW

Assessing the Economics of Genomic Medicine. Kenneth Offit, MD MPH Chief, Clinical Genetics Service Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

NeoTYPE Cancer Profiles

RNA Extraction from Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) Tissue Enabling Next Generation Detection of Gene Fusions

Corporate Medical Policy

Table S1. Demographics of patients and tumor characteristics.

Next Generation Sequencing in Haematological Malignancy: A European Perspective. Wolfgang Kern, Munich Leukemia Laboratory

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Lung Cancer Staging Project, Data Elements

Targeted Molecular Diagnostics for Targeted Therapies in Hematological Disorders

Webinar Series. Characterizing cancers from liquid biopsies and FFPE samples: The rise of targeted sequencing panels. Participating experts

Protein Domain-Centric Approach to Study Cancer Somatic Mutations from High-throughput Sequencing Studies

NeoTYPE Cancer Profiles

Supplementary Figure 1. Copy Number Alterations TP53 Mutation Type. C-class TP53 WT. TP53 mut. Nature Genetics: doi: /ng.

Sample Metrics. Allele Frequency (%) Read Depth Ploidy. Gene CDS Effect Protein Effect. LN Metastasis Tumor Purity Computational Pathology 80% 60%

Clinical, Pathologic and Molecular Updates

ECMC cfdna consensus meeting

AVENIO family of NGS oncology assays ctdna and Tumor Tissue Analysis Kits

Implementation of BRCA Oncomine panel for germline and somatic variant analysis

Changing the Culture of Cancer Care II. Eric Holland Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center University of Washington Seattle

Oncofocus. Patient Test Report

ACTIVITY 2: EXAMINING CANCER PATIENT DATA

Lukas Bubendorf Pathologie. Liquid biopsies

The Next Generation in Cancer Diagnostics.

# 1 India s Best Selling Cancer Genomics Test Precision treatment for every Cancer Patient Patient Guide

Targeted next-generation sequencing of 50 cancer-related genes in Japanese patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

MEDICAL POLICY. SUBJECT: MOLECULAR PANEL TESTING OF CANCERS TO IDENTIFY TARGETED THERAPIES (Excluding NSCLC and CRC) EFFECTIVE DATE: 12/21/17

CentoCancer STRIVE FOR THE MOST COMPLETE INFORMATION

Importancia del patólogo en los tumores de origen desconocido

What is Precision Medicine?

NCCN Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer V Meeting June 15, 2018

Supplementary Figure 1. Cytoscape bioinformatics toolset was used to create the network of protein-protein interactions between the product of each

MEDICAL POLICY Genetic Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancers

Characterisation of structural variation in breast. cancer genomes using paired-end sequencing on. the Illumina Genome Analyser

SALSA MLPA probemix P175-A3 Tumour Gain Lot A3-0714: As compared to the previous version A2 (lot A2-0411), nine probes have a small change in length.

Looking Beyond the Standard-of- Care : The Clinical Trial Option

Whole Genome and Transcriptome Analysis of Anaplastic Meningioma. Patrick Tarpey Cancer Genome Project Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

Exons from 137 genes were targeted for hybrid selection and massively parallel sequencing.

Development of Circulating Tumor DNA

Enterprise Interest Thermo Fisher Scientific / Employee

Next-generation sequencing based clinical testing for lung cancer in Japan

Fusion Analysis of Solid Tumors Reveals Novel Rearrangements in Breast Carcinomas

QIAGEN Complete Solutions for Liquid Biopsy Molecular Testing

Diagnostic application of SNParrays to brain cancers

Result: POSITIVE Mutations Detected: EGFR-T790M, EGFR-L858R

EBUS-TBNA Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer

Clinical molecular profiling of archival tumor tissue and cell-free DNA from patients with Erdheim-Chester disease

Utility of liquid biopsies EQA Program Naples, IT Sidney A. Scudder, MD Director, Clinical Science 13 May, 2017

Diagnostic test Suggested website label Description Hospitals available

Comprehensive Analyses of Circulating Cell- Free Tumor DNA

Transcription:

Madrid, Spain IMPLEMENTING NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING IN A PATHOLOGY LABORATORY Dr. JL Rodríguez Peralto

NGS

Ion Torrent Oncomine Focus Assay - Implementation experience for EGFR mutation detection at HOSPITAL 12 DE OCTUBRE For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.

Oncomine Focus Assay (Thermo Fisher) Hotspot genes, n=35 Copy Number Variants, n=19 Fusion drivers, n=23 AKT1 ALK AR BRAF CDK4 CTNNB1 DDR2 EGFR ERBB2 ERBB3 ERBB4 ESR1 FGFR2 FGFR3 GNA11 GNAQ HRAS IDH1 IDH2 JAK1 JAK2 JAK3 KIT KRAS MAP2K1 MAP2K2 MET MTOR NRAS PDGFRA PIK3CA RAF1 RET ROS1 SMO ALK AR BRAF CCND1 CDK4 CDK6 EGFR ERBB2 FGFR1 FGFR2 FGFR3 FGFR4 KIT KRAS MET MYC MYCN PDGFRA PIK3CA ALK RET ROS1 NTRK1 NTRK2 NTRK3 FGFR1 FGFR2 FGFR3 MET BRAF RAF1 ERG ETV1 ETV4 ETV5 ABL1 AKT3 AXL EGFR ERBB2 PDGFRA PPARG DNA Panel 52 genes RNA Panel For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.

Oncomine Focus Assay Workflow Tumor Sample Oncomine Assay* DNA/RNA Kit Ion PGM System* Next-generation Sequencing Ion Reporter Workflow* Automated analysis for SNVs, indels, CNVs and gene fusions Positive Variants Mutations Copy Number Variants Gene Fusions Ion 318 Select Chip* For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.

NGS-DNA (41) - 31 adenocarcinomas (A) - 1 Large cell carcinoma (C) - 9 metastatic adenocarcinomas (M) Mutación CNV EGFR KRAS ALK BRAF AKT1 MTOR FGFR4 MET PIK3CA JAK ERBB3 BRACA1 APC GNAQ GNA11 KIT MYC A A A A A A A A A A A A A C A A A A M A A A A A M A A M A A A M A M A A M M M A M C5 C9 C12 C14 C15 C16 C22 C24 C25 C27 C11 C10 C21 C13 C1 C2 C18 C8 C33 C34 C36 C37 C26 C4 C39 C7 C32 C38 C19 C23 C28 C17 C3 C20 C29 C6 C30 C31 C35 C40 C41 Mutation HotSpot Mutación HotSpot for validation Amplification

NGS (41) EGFR Nº Cases % Cases WT 27 65,9 DEL19 5 12,2 L858R 6 14,6 L858R/V834L 1 2,4 INS20 1 2,4 DEL19/T790M 1 2,4 COBAS (40) EGFR Nº Cases % Cases WT 28 70,0 DEL19 5 12,5 L858R 6 15,0 INS20 1 2,5

DISCORDANT CASES 7,5%, 3/40 COBAS DEL19 WT L858R NGS DEL19-T790M L858R L858R-V834L

For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. Oncomine Knowledgebase Reporter Software

NGS-RNA (37) - 27 adenocarcinomas (A) - 1 Large cell carcinoma (C) - 9 metastatic adenocarcinoma (M) Mutación CNV Fusion EGFR KRAS ALK BRAF AKT1 MTOR FGFR4 MET PIK3CA JAK ERBB3 BRACA1 APC GNAQ GNA11 KIT MYC ALK MET A A A A A A A A A A A A A C A A A A M A A A A A M A A M A A A M A M A A M M M A M C A A M A A A M C5 C9 C12 C14 C15 C16 C22 C24 C25 C27 C11 C10 C21 C13 C1 C2 C18 C8 C33 C34 C36 C37 C26 C4 C39 C7 C32 C38 C19 C23 C28 C17 C3 C20 C29 C6 C30 C31 C35 C40 C41 C42 C43 C44 C45 C46 C47 C48 C49 Mutation HotSpot Mutation HotSpot for validation Amplificaction Unvaluable Fusion - 1 ALK positive confirmed by FISH - 16 ROS1 negative IQ

For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. Oncomine Knowledgebase Reporter Software

BEAR Project

BEAR Project - Participating Sites

BEAR Project - Samples 48 FFPE samples : each of the 8 sites provided 6 Samples : 4 samples for gene mutation analysis (DNA extraction) 2 samples for fusion transcript analysis (RNA extraction) Previously characterized samples: Colorectal adenocarcinoma Lung adenocarcinoma Melanoma Papillary thyroid carcinoma Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BEAR Project - Technical Approach - Total number of FFPE samples processed - DNA samples: 32 in triplicate - RNA samples: 16 in triplicate - Material sent from samples: - 3 sections from each sample to each processing laboratory - Laboratories that processed samples: - Hospital Ramon y Cajal Madrid - Hospital 12 de Octubre Madrid - Laboratorio de Dianas Terapeuticas Madrid - Technical support: - FAS: Andrea Verardi, Marco Morey - CAC: Francesco Acquadro

Oncomine Solid Tumour DNA and Fusion Transcript Kits Hotspot Genes n=22 Fusion Drivers n=4 EGFR ALK ERBB2 ERBB4 FGFR1 FGFR2 FGFR3 MET DDR2 KRAS PIK3CA BRAF AKT1 PTEN NRAS MAP2K1 STK11 NOTCH1 CTNNB1 SMAD4 FBXW7 TP53 ALK ROS1 RET NTRK1

BEAR Project - Results DNA 23 New Variants 30 Samples Oncomine Solid Tumor DNA CE-IVD General Filter BEAR 32 Previously characterized Variants Sensitivity: 100% (32/32) *In addition 23 potentially pathogenic variants not previously tested were found

BEAR Project - Results DNA WT BRAF mut EGFR mut KRAS mut NRAS TP53 P L1 LQ LQ L2 L3 LQ Wild type cases BRAF mut cases EGFR mut cases KRAS mut cases NRAS mut cases TP53 mut cases KRAS +TP53 mut cases BRAF + EGFR mut cases Low quality results P: previous characterization L1, L2, L3: results from the 3 labs performing Ion Torrent analysis LQ: low quality

BEAR Project Results DNA- Concordance L1 30 Samples 100% Concordance L2 30 Samples L1 26 Samples * 96% Concordance L2 26 Samples L3 26 Samples *1/26 bad quality samples didn't give results

BEAR Project Results DNA- Conclusions - NGS method used shows a very strong inter-laboratory concordance of results obtained - A total of 55 variants were identified in the 30 processed samples - All the expected variants (n=32) were identified (Sensitivity 100%) - 23 potentially pathogenic extra variants (not previously tested) were identified in the samples

Laboratorio de Dianas Terapeuticas Bárbara Angulo Carolina Dominguez Susana Hernández Fernando López Rios Hospital 12 de Octubre Jose Luis Rodríguez Peralto Yolanda Ruano Diana Cantero Hospital Ramon y Cajal José Palacios Tamara Caniego Almudena Santón Hospital Virgen del Rocio Michele Biscuola Enrique de Álava Fundación Jiménez Diaz Federico Rojo Cristina Chamizo Nerea Carvajal Hospital del Mar Beatriz Bellosillo Raquel Longaron Erica Torres Sergi Serrano Hospital Universitario Vall d Hebrón Javier Hernández Losa Roso Mares Rosa Somoza Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla Javier Gómez Miguel Angel Piris Thermo Fisher Scientific and Technical support: Francesco Acquadro, CAC Andrea Verardi, FAS ; Marcos Morey, FAS

NGS strategies that we have tried for TMB: pros and cons Oncomine Tumor Mutation Load Assay TruSight Tumor 170 Qiaseq Comprehensive Cancer Panel Genes, Input sample and Technology 409 genes DNA RNA Amplicon-based 170 genes DNA RNA Hybridization capturebased 275 genes DNA RNA Hybridizationextension-based Detected alterations SNVs, CNVs, small InDels DNA: SNVs, CNVs, Indels RNA: Fusions, Splice Variants SNVs, CNVs, small Indels Horizontal coverage 1,75 Mb Mutational burden 0,52 Mb Mutational burden? 0,83 Mb Mutational burden? Data analysis Ion Reporter Software More artefacts Base Space Sequence Hub Software Data Less artefacts Insight Software Less artefacts (UMIs) Thermo Fisher Illumina Qiagen

TMB Mutations/Mb 32 NSCLCs from Hospital 12 de Octubre (Madrid) Oncomine Tumor Mutation Load Assay 9.3% High 44% Intermediate TMB Groups Mutations/Mb Low 1-5 Intermediate 6-19 High 20 Samples 46% Low For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.

Comparison study of technologies using Foundation One as gold standard Patient # TMB MS Mutations Found VUS Total Tissue origin Type of tumour Illumina TST170 AmpliSeq CCP QiaSeq CCP Thermo TML D00/MCBM Med 7/Mb Stable STK11, MYC, KEAP1, TP53 ATR, BRIP1, CEBPA, EP300, FAM123B, IRS2, SDHA, TGFBR2, WT1 13 Brain Unknown primary adenocarcinoma 8,5 D01/MEER High 62/Mb Stable ERBB2, NF1, STK11, ERRFI1, MYC, ASXL1, CDKN2A, SMARCA4, TET2, TP53 44 54 Soft tissue Unknown primary adenocarcinoma 54 D02/ERR D03/MPCR D04/ARA Low 2/Mb Low 1/Mb Low 4/Mb Stable MAP2K1, ARID1A, CDKN2A/B, KDM5C, KDM6A BRCA2, STAT2, MAP3K1, SYK, TNFAIP3, MLL2, NSD1 12 Soft tissue Stable BCOR, MYB AKT1, AR, CTNNA1, FAT1 6 Lung Stable MLL3 FANCA, WISP 3 Lung Unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma Lung adenoid cystic carcinoma Lung adenoid cystic carcinoma 4 D08/MTLC Med 15/Mb Stable STK11, CDKN2A/B, KEAP1, TP53 20 24 Lung Lung adenocarcinoma 7,5 D10/MARP Low 4/Mb Stable KRAS, PIK3CA, APC, ARID1A, FAM1234B, TP53 BRIP1, SMAD2, MAP3K1, SMAD3, NOTCH1, ZNF703, POLE, PTCH1, ROS1 15 Peritoneum Unknown primary adenocarcinoma 10 70 60 y = 1.077x - 2.9544 R² = 0.9648 50 TML Thermo 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 FoM

Conclusions NGS platform must be previously tested before to implant in a pathology laboratory NGS with a specific platforms is an effective and efficient technology NGS is accurate, easily to implant, cheaper and saver tissue than sequential PCR NGS is an excellent and precise technology to detect actionable mutations Some platform reports ie. Oncomine Knowledgebase Reporter Software facilitate the selection of target drugs and the clinical trials available for these patients. Thermo Fisher Scientific and its affiliates are not endorsing, recommending, or promoting any use or application of Thermo Fisher Scientific products presented by third parties during this symposium. Information and materials presented or provided by third parties are provided as-is and without warranty of any kind, including regarding intellectual property rights and reported results. Parties presenting images, text and material represent they have the rights to do so.