Late and Very Late Drug-Eluting Stent Malapposition Serial 2-Year Quantitative IVUS Analysis

Late and Very Late Drug-Eluting Stent Malapposition Serial 2-Year Quantitative IVUS Analysis Soo-Jin Kang, MD; Gary S. Mintz, MD; Duk-Woo Park, MD; Seung-Whan Lee, MD; Young-Hak Kim, MD; Cheol Whan Lee, MD; Ki-Hoon Han, MD; Jae-Joong Kim, MD; Seong-Wook Park, MD; Seung-Jung Park, MD Background The long-term natural history of acquired malapposition continues to be the subject of debate. Methods and Results Using volumetric intravascular ultrasound analyses, we evaluated serial (poststenting, 6-month, and 2-year follow-up) changes in drug-eluting stent treated vascular segments with acquired malapposition. External elastic membrane, stent, lumen, malapposition, and peristent plaque media (P M external elastic membrane stent malapposition) areas were measured; and volumes were calculated and divided by stent length (normalized volume). Among 250 lesions in which complete serial intravascular ultrasound data were available, stent malapposition was identified in 19 lesions (7.6%) at 6 months, and an additional 13 malapposition lesions were newly detected at 2 years (5.2%). Because no malapposition sites resolved, the malapposition rate at 2 years was 12.8%. Malapposition areas and volumes were correlated to the increases in external elastic membrane (positive remodeling) throughout the study period, from immediately after stenting to 6 months and from 6 months to 2 years, both in the group that developed malapposition at 6 months and in the group that developed malapposition at 2 years. Clinical follow-up beyond the 2 year intravascular ultrasound study was done in all patients. Overall, there were 2 cardiac deaths and 1 noncardiac death. Two patients presented with acute myocardial infarction associated with very late stent thrombosis (1 definite stent thrombosis, 1 probable stent thrombosis). Three patients underwent repeat revascularization owing to in-stent restenosis developed after the 2-year follow-up. Conclusions Expansive vascular remodeling may play a role in the development and dynamic progression of acquired drug-eluting stent malapposition, not only during the first 6 months after implantation but thereafter. (Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:335-340.) Key Words: late stent malapposition drug-eluting stent volumetric IVUS analysis Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies have reported a higher frequency of late stent malapposition (LSM) lesions in patients with drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with bare metal stents. These studies also have suggested that positive vessel remodeling and/or a decrease in plaque volume (clot lysis or plaque regression) are important mechanisms of LSM after DES or bare metal stent implantation. 1 3 However, there are few long-term follow-up data documenting the progression or regression of midterm LSM or delayed development of LSM beyond 6 to 9 months. The aims of this study were to use IVUS immediately after intervention and at the 6-month and 2-year of follow-up to evaluate serial vascular changes in patients with LSM identified at 6 months and newly detected at 2 years. In parallel with the Academic Research Consortium definition of stent thrombosis, 4 we adopted the term late stent malapposition to apply to malapposition between 30 days and 1 year and the term very late stent malapposition (VLSM) to apply to malapposition after 1 year. Clinical Perspective on p 340 Methods Subjects From the IVUS Core Laboratory database at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, we identified 250 lesions in which DES implantation was performed between March 2003 and August 2005 and in which complete serial (poststenting, 6-month, and 2-year follow-up) IVUS data were available. After reviewing all IVUS images, we excluded patients with serious comorbid diseases; graft lesions; restenosis on 6-month angiography; or adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or target-vessel revascularization before the 2-year follow-up studies. Stent thrombosis was classified as previously described. 4 All procedures were performed with standard techniques. Patients not previously taking antiplatelet agents were pretreated with a 300- Received October 15, 2009; accepted April 19, 2010. From the Department of Cardiology (S.-J.K., D.-W.P., S.-W.L., Y.H.K., C.W.L., K.-H.H., J.-J.K., S.-W.P., S.-J.P.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (G.S.M.), New York, NY. Correspondence to Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, South Korea. E-mail sjpark@amc.seoul.kr 2010 American Heart Association, Inc. Circ Cardiovasc Interv is available at http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.916502 335

336 Circ Cardiovasc Interv August 2010 Table 1. Baseline Clinical Characteristics of Patients Who Developed Stent Malapposition Variable LSM (at 6 Months) VLSM (at 2 Years) No. 19 13 Age, mean SD, y 53.7 11.9 54.4 10.6 Male 15 (78.9) 7 (53.8) Smoking 8 (42.1) 4 (30.8) Hypertension 14 (73.7) 7 (53.8) Hypercholesterolemia 4 (21.1) 4 (30.8) Diabetes mellitus 2 (10.5) 2 (15.4) Previous percutaneous intervention 2 (10.5) 0 (0) Previous bypass surgery 1 (5.3) 0 (0) Clinical presentation Stable angina 12 (63.2) 5 (38.5) Unstable angina 4 (21.1) 5 (38.5) Acute myocardial infarction 3 (15.8) 3 (23.1) All values except those for age are No. and (%). to 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel or 500 mg ticlopidine followed by clopidogrel (75 mg/d) or ticlopidine (250 mg/d) for at least 6 months after intervention and aspirin (100 to 200 mg/d) indefinitely. Cilostazol 200 mg/d was prescribed for at least 1 month in patients with high-risk clinical profiles or who underwent complicated procedures. Angiographic Analysis All eligible patients were requested to return for angiographic follow-up at 6 months after the initial procedure. Qualitative angiographic measurements were done by standard techniques with automated edge-detection algorithms (CASS-5, Pie-Medical, Netherlands) in the angiographic analysis center of the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Seoul, Korea. 5 8 Angiographic image acquisition was performed at target sites with 2 or more angiographic projections of the stenosis at baseline, after stenting, and at 6 months. Angiographic restenosis was defined as a diameter stenosis 50% at follow-up angiography. The patients who underwent 6-month angiography without visual restenosis were asked to return at 2 years after the procedure for 2-year angiographic surveillance. IVUS Imaging and Analysis IVUS imaging was performed after intracoronary administration of 0.2 mg nitroglycerin with motorized transducer pullback (0.5 mm/s) and a commercial scanner (Boston Scientific/SCIMED, Minneapolis, Minn) consisting of a rotating 30- or 40-MHz transducer within a 3.2F imaging sheath. Quantitative volumetric IVUS analysis was performed as previously described. 9,10 By computerized planimetry (EchoPlaque 3.0, Indec Systems, MountainView, Calif), stent and reference segments were assessed every 1 mm. The reference segment external elastic membrane (EEM), lumen, and plaque plus media (P M EE lumen) areas were measured over a 5-mm length adjacent to each stent edge and averaged. In-stent measurements were also obtained every 1 mm and included EEM, stent, lumen (intrastent lumen bounded by the borders of the stent and intimal hyperplasia [IH]), peristent P M (EEM stent), and IH (stent intrastent lumen) areas and volumes. Percent IH was defined as IH divided by stent. All volumes were calculated with Simpson s rule and then divided by stent length (normalized volume). Stent malapposition was defined as a separation of at least 1 stent strut not in contact with the intimal surface of the arterial wall that was not overlapping a side branch, was not present immediately after stent implantation, and had evidence of blood speckling behind the strut. 3,11 LSM was defined as stent malapposition developing between 30 days and 1 year, but typically detected on 6-month follow-up IVUS; VLSM was defined as an LSM lesion that Table 2. Angiographic Data and Procedural Characteristics of Lesions That Developed Stent Malapposition Variable LSM (at 6 Months) VLSM (at 2 Years) No. 19 13 6-month follow-up duration, 6.4 0.9 6.5 1.7 mean SD, mo 2-year follow-up duration, 26.5 6.8 23.5 3.8 mean SD, mo Angiographic findings Chronic total occlusion, No. (%) 2 (10.5%) 0 (0%) TIMI 0, No. (%) 4 (21.1%) 0 (0%) Lesion site, No. (%) Left anterior descending artery 12 (63.2%) 10 (76.9%) Left circumflex artery 3 (15.8%) 2 (15.4%) Right coronary artery 4 (21.1%) 1 (7.7%) Bifurcation lesion 1 (5.3%) 1 (7.7%) Infarct-related artery 3 (16%) 1 (7.7%) DES type Sirolimus-eluting stent 19 (89.5%) 13 (100%) Paclitaxel-eluting stent 2 (10.5%) 0 (%) Procedural findings Direct stenting, No. (%) 4 (21%) 1 (7.7%) Directional coronary atherectomy 4 (21.1%) 0 (0%) Cutting balloon 3 (15.8%) 3 (23.1%) Maximal balloon size used, mm 3.7 0.4 3.6 0.4 Maximal balloon pressure, atm 15.3 3.1 15.8 2.9 No. of DESs per lesion 1.2 0.4 1.3 0.5 Stent length, mean SD, mm 26.3 11.5 25.6 7.6 TIMI indicates thrombolysis in myocardial infarction. developed after 1 year, that is, newly detected at 2-year IVUS but not present at the 6-month IVUS. Within LSM and VLSM segments, malapposition and P M [EEM stent malapposition] areas and volumes (by Simpson s rule) were calculated. Statistical Analysis All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). Categorical data are presented as counts and percentages and were compared by 2 statistics or Fisher s exact test. Continuous variables are presented as mean SD and were compared with the nonparametric Mann Whitney test. All probability values were 2 sided, and probability values 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. The significance of early and late changes in quantitative IVUS data for LSM and vascular remodeling was tested by the Friedman test. When probability values were 0.05, the Wilcox test with Bonferroni correction was used to evaluate the significance of changes between the 2 time points. Results Clinical and Procedural Characteristic Data The time point of late and very late follow-up was 6.4 1.3 and 25.3 5.8 months, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, LSM was identified in 19 lesions (7.6%); an additional 13 VLSM lesions were newly detected at 2 years (5.2%). Because no LSM resolved, the VLSM rate at 2 years was 12.8%. There was no significant difference in baseline

Kang et al Serial Vascular Changes in Late Stent Malapposition 337 Table 3. Volumetric IVUS Measurements After Stenting and at 6-Month and 2-Year Follow-Up LSM (at 6 Months, 19 Lesions) VLSM (at 2 Years,13 Lesions) After Stenting 6 Months 2 Years After Stenting 6 Months 2 Years Proximal reference EEM area, mm 2 14.9 5.0 16.1 5.8 16.2 4.5 13.0 3.0 13.2 3.0 14.2 3.5 Lumen area, mm 2 8.2 2.6 8.9 2.9 8.9 3.1 7.9 1.3 7.9 1.8 8.1 1.9 P M area, mm 2 6.7 2.8 7.2 3.4 7.3 3.1 5.2 2.3 5.3 1.7 6.1 2.3 Stented segment Lumen area, mm 2 6.4 1.5 6.1 1.8 5.8 1.9 5.6 1.1 5.0 1.4 5.5 1.5 Stent volume, mm 3 211.2 114.8 222.7 114.8 217.8 107.0 170.5 49.3 179.0 58.7 190.5 54.3 Lumen volume, mm 3 211.2 114.8 205.5 102.3 197.4 93.0 170.5 49.3 165.6 51.1 175.7 50.7 IH volume, mm 3 0 0 18.9 18.2 19.7 20.1 0 0 13.4 11.9 14.9 12.4 IH volume, % 0 0 7.9 5.4 8.6 7.3 0 0 7.1 4.4 7.6 6.0 EEM volume, mm 3 434.0 216.6 494.1 257.2 538.3 264.8 348.2 94.6 371.5 115.6 474.3 182.0 P M volume, mm 3 220.3 106.5 264.2 144.7 302.8 172.5 177.8 53.3 192.6 65.7 257.9 127.5 Normalized stent volume, mm 2 7.9 1.8 8.4 2.2 8.3 1.9 6.8 1.0* 7.1 1.3 7.6 1.4 Normalized lumen volume, mm 2 7.9 1.8 7.8 2.2 7.6 2.0 6.8 1.0* 6.6 1.3 7.0 1.5 Normalized IH volume, mm 2 0 0 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.5 0 0 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 Normalized EEM volume, mm 2 16.5 3.6 18.6 4.3 20.3 3.3 13.9 2.5* 14.8 2.6* 18.5 4.4 Normalized P M volume, mm 2 8.5 2.2 9.9 2.5 11.2 2.8 7.1 1.9 7.7 1.9* 9.9 3.4 Distal reference Mean EEM area, mm 2 12.7 4.6 13.0 4.0 13.8 3.3 9.7 3.3 11.3 4.2 12.1 4.2 Lumen area, mm 2 7.8 2.4 7.9 2.1 7.7 1.6 5.7 1.6* 6.0 1.6* 6.0 1.4* P M area, mm 2 4.8 3.3 5.1 3.1 6.0 2.8 4.0 2.3 5.3 3.2 6.2 3.5 All values are mean SD. *P 0.05, LSM vs VLSM (at the same time point). clinical and procedural characteristics between LSM and VLSM (Tables 1 and 2). Baseline, 6-Month, and 2-Year IVUS Findings IVUS findings after stent implantation, at 6 months, and at 2 years and serial changes in IVUS parameters are shown in Tables 3 and 4. At baseline, distal reference lumen areas (P 0.035) and normalized EEM (P 0.033) and stent volumes (P 0.045) were larger in patients who developed LSM at 6 months compared with patients who developed VLSM between 6 months and 2 years. These differences persisted at 6 months; however, the difference in normalized EEM volume between the 2 groups resolved at 2 years because of the greater increase in EEM volume in the VLSM group from 6 months to 2 years. Serial IVUS Findings and LSM In the LSM group, malapposition area measured 2.7 1.6 mm 2 at 6 months and continued to increase during the very late phase (6 months to 2 years) to 3.8 2.1 mm 2 at 2 years (P 0.027 after Bonferroni correction). Similarly, malapposition volume measured 7.3 8.0 mm 3 at 6 months and increased to 17.7 17.6 mm 3 at 2 years (P 0.009), as did malapposition length (5.0 3.2 mm at 6 months vs 10.1 8.1 mm at 2 years, P 0.012; Table 5 and Figure 1). In only 3 lesions was there a decrease in malapposition volumes from 6 months to 2 years. In the LSM group, there was a significant increase in EEM area (measured at the level showing the maximal malapposition area at 6 months) during the first 6 months (from 16.3 3.8 to 21.4 5.5 mm 2 at 6 months, P 0.003) with further increases in the late phase (P 0.021). On the other hand, the increase in EEM area (measured at the same level showing the maximal malapposition area at 2 years) in the VLSM group was restricted to the late phase (15.3 3.1 mm 2 at 6 months to 21.1 5.5 mm 2 at 2 years, P 0.003); in this group there was no change in EEM area from baseline to 6 months (P 0.06). P M area significantly increased in the LSM group (8.3 2.5 mm 2 after stenting to 12.7 5.0 mm 2 at 2 years, P 0.008) as well as in the VLSM group (6.7 2.3 mm 2 after stenting to 9.2 3.2 mm 2 at 2 years, P 0.022); only 3 lesions showed a 5% reduction in P M volume over 2 years. Malapposition volumes were correlated with the increases in EEM. Overall, malapposition volumes at 2 years were correlated with the increases in normalized EEM volume between 6 months and 2 years (r 0.621, P 0.001), as well as from baseline to 2 years (r 0.631, P 0.001); 6-month malapposition volumes in the LSM group were correlated to the increases in normalized EEM volumes from baseline to 6 months (r 0.475, P 0.040; Figure 2). There was no relation between malapposition volume and %IH volume at 6 months (r 0.013, P 0.94) or 2 years (r 0.177, P 0.33).

338 Circ Cardiovasc Interv August 2010 Table 4. Serial Changes in IVUS Parameters Over 2 Years LSM (at 6 Months) VLSM (at 2 Years) P Value No. 19 13 Between immediately after stenting and 6 months Proximal reference Mean EEM area, mm 2 1.2 1.4 0.2 1.7 0.146 Mean lumen area, mm 2 0.7 0.9 0.0 1.1 0.122 Mean P M area, mm 2 0.5 1.3 0.2 1.4 0.568 Stented segment MLA, mm 2 0.3 1.1 0.5 1.0 0.803 Normalized stent vol, mm 2 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.578 Normalized lumen vol, mm 2 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.8 0.985 Normalized IH vol, mm 2 0.64 0.44 0.48 0.29 0.328 Normalized EEM vol, mm 2 2.1 1.5 0.9 1.5 0.027 Normalized P M vol, mm 2 1.5 1.3 0.5 1.2 0.040 Distal reference Mean EEM area, mm 2 0.9 1.8 0.5 2.0 0.664 Mean lumen area, mm 2 0.4 1.4 0.1 1.1 0.611 Mean P M area, mm 2 0.5 1.0 0.4 1.7 0.883 Between 6 months and 2 years Proximal reference Mean EEM area, mm 2 0.0 2.8 0.9 2.7 0.484 Mean lumen area, mm 2 0.0 2.6 0.2 2.1 0.856 Mean P M area, mm 2 0.0 1.1 0.8 1.5 0.239 Stented segment MLA, mm 2 0.3 1.2 0.5 1.0 0.081 Normalized stent vol, mm 2 0.1 0.8 0.5 0.9 0.081 Normalized lumen vol, mm 2 0.2 0.9 0.5 1.0 0.120 Normalized IH vol, mm 2 0.03 0.20 0.04 0.43 0.803 Normalized EEM vol, mm 2 1.6 3.1 3.8 3.9 0.140 Normalized P M vol, mm 2 1.3 2.7 2.2 2.6 0.409 Distal reference Mean EEM area, mm 2 0.3 2.0 0.9 2.3 0.545 Mean lumen area, mm 2 0.4 1.6 0.0 1.2 0.501 Mean P M area, mm 2 0.7 2.1 0.9 1.8 0.830 MLA indicates minimum lumen area; vol, volume. Clinical Outcomes After 2-Year IVUS Clinical follow-up beyond the 2-year IVUS study was done in all patients; the mean follow-up duration was 56.7 11.9 Table 5. Quantitative IVUS Data for LSM and VLSM months (range, 32.5 to 73.4 months). In the 19 patients with LSM, 1 patient who had a large malapposition volume (16.8 mm 3 at 6 months and 73.2 mm 3 at 2 years) died of unknown causes, and 1 died of advanced gastric cancer. Additionally, 1 patient presented with acute myocardial infarction (probable stent thrombosis). Among 13 patients with VLSM, there were 1 sudden death and 1 acute myocardial infarction caused by very late definite stent thrombosis (associated with withdrawal of antiplatelet therapy for 1 month) confirmed angiographically and pathologically. Overall, 3 patients developed in-stent restenosis after the 2-year follow-up and underwent repeat revascularizations (2 percutaneous coronary interventions, 1 coronary artery bypass surgery). Discussion The major findings of this study involving serial IVUS imaging immediately after stent implantation and at 6 months and 2 years of follow-up are the following: (1) The development of stent malapposition was not limited to the first 6 months after implantation. (2) When malapposition was detected at 6 months, it rarely regressed. Rather, it remained stable or even continued to progress in a significant number of patients as a result of ongoing positive remodeling. Thus, because a considerable number of lesions developed malapposition between 6 months and 2 years, the frequency of acquired malapposition in previous studies may have been underestimated owing to a relatively short-term follow-up period, and malapposition frequency may be dependent on the duration of the follow-up period. The findings of the current study differ from those of Degertekin et al 12 and Aoki et al. 13 Degertekin et al studied 13 patients from the RAVEL or First-in-Man studies who received sirolimus-eluting stents and who had malapposition at 6 or 12 months (the first follow-up) and who then had repeat IVUS 12 months later (second follow-up). At the second follow-up, (1) no new malapposition sites were observed whereas 4 malapposition sites had resolved (although in 1 patient there was a confluence of 3 malapposition sites into a large aneurysm); (2) there was no increase in EEM area; and (3) there was no change in mean malapposition LSM (at 6 Months, 19 Lesions) VLSM (at 2 Years,13 Lesions) After Stenting 6 Months 2 Years After Stenting 6 Months 2 Years LSM CSA, mm 2 0 0 2.7 1.6 3.8 2.1 0 0 0 0 4.0 3.0 EEM CSA, mm 2 16.3 3.8 21.4 5.5 25.0 5.0 13.5 3.3* 15.3 3.1* 21.1 5.5* Stent CSA, mm 2 7.9 2.1 8.8 2.9 8.5 2.3 6.9 1.2 7.3 1.6 8.0 1.7 P M CSA, mm 2 8.3 2.5 9.9 3.1 12.7 5.0 6.7 2.3 7.9 2.0* 9.2 3.2* Intrastent lumen CSA, mm 2 7.9 2.1 8.1 2.9 7.9 2.5 6.9 1.2 6.8 1.4 7.6 2.0 IH CSA, mm 2 0 0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.4 LSM volume, mm 3 0 0 7.3 8.0 17.7 17.6 0 0 0 0 25.9 36.4 LSM length, mm 0 0 5.0 3.2 10.1 8.1 0 0 0 0 9.9 10.6 CSA indicates cross-sectional area. All areas were measured at the frame showing the maximal LSM area. P values were derived by the Wilcox test with Bonferroni correction. *P 0.05, LSM 6 months vs LSM 2 years. P 0.05, after stenting vs 6-month follow-up. P 0.05, 6-month vs 2-year follow-up. The area measurements were performed at the same level showing the maximal LSM area at the next follow-up.

Kang et al Serial Vascular Changes in Late Stent Malapposition 339 Figure 1. Serial vascular changes in lesions with LSM (A, n 19) and VLSM (B, n 13). All probability values were obtained by Wilcox test with Bonferroni correction. area. However, Degertekin et al did not evaluate poststenting IVUS and, therefore, could not exclude acute and persistent incomplete stent apposition. The mechanism and evolution of acute, persistent malapposition may differ from acquired malapposition. We previously demonstrated that postprocedure incomplete stent apposition (51 lesions, 7.2%) all persisted at the 6-month follow-up with no change in the size of the incomplete apposition segment. 11 Aoki et al 13 reported 84 event-free paclitaxel-eluting stent treated patients from TAXUS-II studied at 6 months and 2 years. In the 41 moderate-release formulation treated patients, the incidence of malapposition decreased from 9.8% at 6 months to 2.4% at 2 years (associated with a 1.38 1.78 mm 2 decrease in EEM area); in the 43 slowrelease formulation treated patients, the incidence of malapposition decreased from 9.3% at 6 months to 0% at 2 years (associated with a 1.33 1.74 mm 2 decrease in EEM area). In the current study, all but 3 lesions in the LSM group continued to progress after 6 months. The exceptions were 3 lesions with a reduction in malapposition volume associated with a decrease in EEM volume from 6 months to 2 years. The study conducted by Aoki et al included only paclitaxeleluting stent treated lesions. In the current study, 2 of 3 lesions with a reduction of malapposition volume at 2 years were paclitaxel-eluting stent treated lesions. Many studies have shown that acquired stent malapposition is caused by regional positive remodeling and resolution of plaque or thrombi. 1 3 However, those studies all involved only 2 time points, (1) baseline and (2) follow-up that ranged from 6 to 13 months after stenting. In this present study, we also realized the clear relation between the extent of malapposition and positive vascular remodeling throughout the 2-year study. In addition, the current analysis suggested that in some patients, positive remodeling increases beyond 6 months to result in additional areas of malapposition or does not begin to develop until after 6 months; however, in our analysis, there were no features or baseline characteristics separating the lesions with late-developing or late-worsening positive remodeling (or new malapposition) beyond 6 months from those with LSM that developed within 6 months after stent implantation. Limitations First, this was a retrospective, observational study to assess IVUS parameters and clinical outcomes in a highly selected subgroup of event-free patients. Thus, it may have caused an underestimation in the prevalence of late and very late malapposition and potentially affect the event rates, which is a clear limitation of a serial IVUS study. In terms of DES safety, we previously reported that LSM after DES implan- Figure 2. Relations between changes in normalized EEM volumes and LSM volumes. A, Correlation between overall changes in normalized EEM volume and LSM volume at 2 years. B, Correlation between late changes in normalized EEM volume and LSM volume at 2 years. C, Correlation between early changes in normalized EEM volume and LSM volume at 6 months.

340 Circ Cardiovasc Interv August 2010 tation was not a predictor of major adverse cardiac events or stent thrombosis at 3 years after the 6-month IVUS. 14 Although our recent study consistently demonstrated only a small number of long-term cardiovascular events in patients with LSM and VLSM at a mean follow-up duration of 57 months, crucial limitations regarding the small sample size and potential for selection bias should be thoroughly considered before extending these observations to the greater cohort of patients undergoing routine DES implantation. Second, we did not find any baseline characteristics of patients or lesions that predicted the developments of LSM versus VLSM. Finally, the impact of LSM or VLSM on clinical outcomes require further investigation in a large cohort. Conclusions The current study extends the time window for the development of acquired stent vessel wall malapposition out to 2 years after DES implantation. Furthermore, malapposition detected at 6 months continuously progressed and new areas of malapposition developed, all related to ongoing positive remodeling. None. Disclosures References 1. Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Kim YH, Lee SW, Song JM, Han KH, Kang DH, Song JK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ. Incidence, mechanism, predictors, and long-term prognosis of late stent malapposition after bare-metal stent implantation. Circulation. 2004;109:881 886. 2. Mintz GS, Shah VM, Weissman NJ. Regional remodeling as the cause of late stent malapposition. Circulation. 2003;107:2660 2663. 3. Shah VM, Mintz GS, Apple S, Weissman NJ. Background incidence of late malapposition after bare-metal stent implantation. Circulation. 2002; 106:1753 1755. 4. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007;115:2344 2351. 5. Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM, Kennedy JW, King SB III, Loop FD, Peterson KL, Reeves TJ, Williams DO, Winters WL Jr. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation. 1988;78:486 502. 6. Popma JJ, Leon MB, Moses JW, Holmes DR Jr, Cox N, Fitzpatrick M, Douglas J, Lambert C, Mooney M, Yakubov S, Kuntz RE; SIRIUS Investigators. Quantitative assessment of angiographic restenosis after sirolimuseluting stent implantation in native coronary arteries. Circulation. 2004;110: 3773 3780. 7. Ellis SG, Popma JJ, Lasala JM, Koglin JJ, Cox DA, Hermiller J, O Shaughnessy C, Mann JT, Turco M, Caputo R, Bergin P, Greenberg J, Stone GW. Relationship between angiographic late loss and target lesion revascularization after coronary stent implantation: analysis from the TAXUS-IV trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1193 1200. 8. Lee SW, Park SW, Kim YH, Yun SC, Park DW, Lee CW, Hong MK, Rhee KS, Chae JK, Ko JK, Park JH, Lee JH, Choi SW, Jeong JO, Seong IW, Cho YH, Lee NH, Kim JH, Chun KJ, Kim HS, Park SJ. A randomized comparison of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52: 727 733. 9. Park SJ, Shim WH, Ho DS, Raizner AE, Park SW, Hong MK, Lee CW, Choi D, Jang Y, Lam R, Weissman NJ, Mintz GS. A paclitaxel-eluting stent for the prevention of coronary restenosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348: 1537 1545. 10. Mintz GS, Weissman NJ, Teirstein PS, Ellis SG, Waksman R, Russo RJ, Moussa I, Tripuraneni P, Jani S, Kobayashi Y, Giorgianni JA, Pappas C, Kuntz RA, Moses J, Leon MB. Effect of intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy on in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound analysis from the GAMMA-1 study. Circulation. 2000;102:2915 2918. 11. Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Park DW, Park KM, Lee BK, Kim YH, Song JM, Han KH, Kang DH, Cheong SS, Song JK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ. Late stent malapposition after drug-eluting stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound analysis with long-term follow-up. Circulation. 2006;113:414 419. 12. Degertekin M, Serruys PW, Tanabe K, Lee CH, Sousa JE, Colombo A, Morice MC, Ligthart JM, de Feyter PJ. Long-term follow-up of incomplete stent apposition in patients who received sirolimus-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions: an intravascular ultrasound analysis. Circulation. 2003;108:2747 2750. 13. Aoki J, Colombo A, Dudek D, Banning AP, Drzewiecki J, Zmudka K, Schiele F, Russell ME, Koglin J, Serruys PW; TAXUS II Study Group. Peristent remodeling and neointimal suppression 2 years after polymerbased, paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: insights from serial intravascular ultrasound analysis in the TAXUS II study. Circulation. 2005; 112:3876 3883. 14. Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim YH, Kang DH, Cheong SS, Song JK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ. Impact of late drugeluting stent malapposition on 3-year clinical events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1515 1516. CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE The long-term natural history of acquired stent malapposition continues to be the subject of concern. Among 250 lesions in which intravascular ultrasound data were available at the time of implantation and at the 6-month and 2-year follow-up, acquired stent malapposition was identified in 19 (7.6%) at 6 months and in an additional 13 at 2 years (5.2%). Malapposition areas and volumes were correlated with the increases in the external elastic membrane (positive remodeling) throughout the study period, both in the group that developed malapposition at 6 months and in those who developed malapposition at 2 years. Furthermore, those lesions with malapposition at 6 months continuously progressed. Thus, acquired stent malapposition appears to be an ongoing process and is related to progressive vascular remodeling. Determination of the incidence of acquired malapposition must take into account the duration of follow-up.