Session 47.

Similar documents
SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the modification of the terms of authorisation of Protural (sodium benzoate) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

Scientific Opinion on the modification to the formulation of GalliPro and compatibility with formic acid 1

Statement on the preparation of guidance for the assessment of plant/herbal products and their constituents used as feed additives 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for piglets 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (Benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of MycoCell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for dairy cows 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Autorisation of Feed Additives - the Risk

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Feed Additive Approval An Industry View. Dr Heidi Burrows Regulatory manager

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 October 2007

Safety of the enzymatic preparation Natuphos (3-phytase) for sows 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for dairy buffaloes 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Natugrain Wheat TS (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) for use as feed additive for chickens for fattening and ducks 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Avizyme 1505 (endo-1,4-β-xylanase, α-amylase, subtilisin) as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1,2

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Mn) as feed additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 3,4

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium) as a feed additive for dogs 1

Scientific Opinion on the Safety and Efficacy of thaumatin for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30236) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening 1,2

Preparatory work to support the re-evaluation of technological feed additives

Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc 47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for pigs for fattening 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 3 February 2009

The EFSA Journal (2005) 262, 1-6

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 10 July 2007

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Cu) as feed additive for all species 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 207, 1-6

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of synthetic alpha-tocopherol for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of erythrosine in feed for cats and dogs, ornamental fish and reptiles 1

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 19 September 2007

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus brevis (DSMZ 21982) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

The EFSA Journal (2005) 171, 1-5

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Formi LHS (potassium diformate) as a feed additive for sows 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 289, 1-6

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question N EFSA-Q )

The EFSA Journal (2004) 96, 1-5

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 22963) as a silage additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2005) 287, 1-9

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium hydroxide for dogs, cats and ornamental fish 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 406, 1-11

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (DSM 12836) as a silage additive for all species 1

Joint Research Centre

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2006) 385, 1-9

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus (DSM 12834) as a silage additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS (6-phytase) as a feed additive for finfish. Abstract

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 12856) as a silage additive for all species 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 288, 1-7

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 2 April 2009

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q )

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 16 July 2008

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

TECHNICAL REPORT OF EFSA. List of guidance, guidelines and working documents developed or in use by EFSA 1

Application for registration or approval under the EU Feed Hygiene Regulation (183/2005)

The EFSA Journal (2006) 384, 1-9

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of anthranilate derivatives (chemical group 27) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Safety of Allura Red AC in feed for cats and dogs

Scientific Opinion on the safety of Hostazym X as a feed additive for poultry and pigs 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus kefiri (DSM 19455) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 November 2008 by the FEEDAP Panel and on 29 October 2008 by the GMO Panel

Scientific Opinion on the efficacy of Suilectin (Phaseolus vulgaris lectins) as a zootechnical additive for suckling piglets (performance enhancer)

Maximum Residue Limits for Clinacox 0.5% (diclazuril) for turkeys for fattening, chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of diclazuril (Clinacox 0.5 %) as feed additive for chickens reared for laying 1

Withdrawal period for Coxidin for chickens and turkeys for fattening and re-examination of the provisional Maximum Residue Limit 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Reauthorisation of Amino Acids in Europe Ruud Bremmers, director of Regal B.V.

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus diolivorans DSM as a silage additive for all animal species

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Abstract

European Union legislation on Food additives, Food enzymes, Extractions solvents and Food flavourings

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

(Text with EEA relevance)

INGREDIENT DECLARATION OF COMPOUND FEEDINGSTUFFS BY PERCENTAGE WEIGHT OF INCLUSION ( PERCENTAGE INGREDIENT DECLARATION )

Safety and efficacy of Mintrex Zn (Zinc chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine) as feed additive for all species 1

Administrative guidance to applicants on the preparation and presentation of applications for authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition

The EFSA Journal (2006) 336, 1-15

Scientific Opinion on safety and efficacy of Cycostat 66G (robenidine hydrochloride) for rabbits for breeding and fattening 1, 2

Transcription:

Session 47 montserrat.anguita@efsa.europa.eu

Assessment of feed additives that improve the diet utilisation in the European Union M. Anguita, J. Galobart, C. Roncancio-Peña FEEDAP Unit EAAP 2009 Barcelona, 24-27 August 2009 2

Part I Part II Authorisation of feed additives in the European Union Assessment of feed additives that belong to the functional group Digestibility Enhancers Miscellanea

Feed additives in the EU In order to be placed on the EU market, feed additives need to undergo an authorisation procedure as established in the Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003

Feed additives in the EU Feed Additives: Substances, microorganisms or preparations, other than feed material and premixtures intentionally added to feed or water in order to: Favourably affect the characteristics of feed, animal products and the colour of ornamental fish and birds Satisfy the nutritional needs of animals Favourably affect the environmental consequences of animal production Favourably affect animal production, performance or welfare Have a coccidiostat or histomonostatic effect

Feed additives in the EU Feed additives categories Technological preservatives, antioxidants, emulsifiers, stabilisers, thickeners thickeners, silage Sensory colourants, flavouring compounds. Nutritional vitamins, trace elements, amino acids, urea Zootechnical additives digestibility enhancers, gut flora stabilisers, substances which favourably affect the environment, other zootechnical additives Coccidiostats and histomonostats

Feed additives in the EU In order to obtain the authorisation an additive has to be basically Safe and efficacious

Feed additives in the EU Conditions for the authorisation (1/2) Safety

Feed additives in the EU Conditions for the authorisation (2/2) Efficacy The claim(s) made by the applicant should be demonstrated Technological preservatives, antioxidants, emulsifiers, stabilisers, thickeners, silage Sensory colourants, flavouring compounds Nutritional vitamins, trace elements, amino acids, urea Zootechnical additives digestibility enhancers, gut flora stabilisers, substances which favourably affect the environment, other zootechnical additives Coccidiostats and histomonostats

Feed additives in the EU Who is Who Applicant The requestor European Commission Risk Manager Risk Assessor

Feed additives in the EU Application Applicant Dossier European Commission European Parliament Member States Request Dossier Assessment Legislation Opinion

Feed additives in the EU The Dossier Section I: Summary of the dossier Section II: Identity, characterisation and conditions of use; Methods of analysis Section III: Studies concerning the safety of the additive Section IV: Studies concerning the efficacy of the additive Section V: Post-market monitoring plan

Feed additives in the EU Application Applicant Dossier European Commission European Parliament Member States Request Dossier Assessment Legislation Opinion

Feed additives in the EU Scientific Assessment of the information Chair of the FEEDAP Panel Andrew Chesson Gabriele Aquilina Paul Brantom Francesca Caloni Pier Sandro Cocconcelli Joop de Knecht Noël Dierick Mikolai Antoni Gralak Jürgen Gropp Ingrid Halle Nils-Gunnar Ilback Reinhard Kroker Peadar Lawlor Lubomir Leng Sven Lindgren Anne K. Lundebye Haldorsen Alberto Mantovani Miklós Mézes Derek Renshaw Maria Saarela

Part I Part II Authorisation of feed additives in the European Union Assessment of feed additives that belong to the functional group Digestibility Enhancers Miscellanea

Digestibility enhancers Zootechnical additives: Any additive used to affect favourably the performance of animals in good health or used to affect favourably the environment Digestibility enhancers, Gut-flora stabilisers, Substances which favourably affect the environment, Other zootechnical additives

Digestibility enhancers Zootechnical additives Digestibility enhancers Substances which, when fed to animals, increase the digestibility of the diet, through action on target feed materials Enzymes Other types of additives with different mode of action

Digestibility enhancers Enzymes The Dossier Section I: Summary of the dossier Section II: Identity, characterisation and conditions of use; Methods of analysis Section III: Studies concerning the safety of the additive Section IV: Studies concerning the efficacy of the additive Section V: Post-market monitoring plan

Digestibility enhancers Enzymes The Dossier Section I: Summary of the dossier Section II: Identity, characterisation and conditions of use; Methods of analysis Section III: Studies concerning the safety of the additive Section IV: Studies concerning the efficacy of the additive Section V: Post-market monitoring plan

Digestibility enhancers - Enzymes Section II - Identity Description of the additive in terms of

Digestibility enhancers - Enzymes Section II - Identity Description of the additive in terms of Composition Enzyme activity Carriers Batch to batch variation Purity µ contamination Mycotoxins Heavy metals and AS Production strain Spent medium Production strain Id. and deposition number Genetic modification Toxins Antibiotic production Physico-chemical properties Shelf-life Stability in premixtures and feed Homogeneity Conditions of use

Digestibility enhancers Enzymes The Dossier Section I: Summary of the dossier Section II: Identity, characterisation and conditions of use; Methods of analysis Section III: Studies concerning the safety of the additive Section IV: Studies concerning the efficacy of the additive Section V: Post-market monitoring plan

Digestibility enhancers - Enzymes Section III Safety (1/4) Safety for the target species Tolerance studies To provide a limited evaluation of the short-term toxicity of the additive for the target animals Multi-fold overdose of the product Monitoring of the health status, performance, gross pathology and blood haematology and chemistry

Digestibility enhancers - Enzymes Section III Safety (2/4) Safety for the consumer Toxicological tests To evaluate the safety for the consumer of food products derived from animals fed the additive and containing residues of the additive or its metabolites Set of Genotoxicity-mutagenicity studies Sub-chronic oral toxicity study Test substance: fermentation product

Digestibility enhancers - Enzymes Section III Safety (3/4) Safety for the user/worker The additive has to be safe for those people handling the additive or feed containing the additive Irritant capacity skin and if negative on the eye Skin sensitisation Enzymes are considered respiratory sensitisers Test substance: the additive

Digestibility enhancers - Enzymes Section III Safety (4/4) Safety for the environment The additive must be safe for the environment Normally, no risks for the environment are expected from the use of enzymes Products produced by a GMO, special attention should be paid to the presence of recombinant DNA in the final product

Digestibility enhancers Enzymes The Dossier Section I: Summary of the dossier Section II: Identity, characterisation and conditions of use; Methods of analysis Section III: Studies concerning the safety of the additive Section IV: Studies concerning the efficacy of the additive Section V: Post-market monitoring plan

Digestibility enhancers - Enzymes Section IV Efficacy (1/2) Efficacy shall be demonstrated in 3 studies showing positive effects on relevant parameters How it should be demonstrated: - three in vivo long term studies - two different locations (1 in the EU) - target categories/species - performance parameters (zootechnical) - minimum recommended dose

Digestibility enhancers - Enzymes Section IV Efficacy (2/2) a) Phytases: Efficacy can be demonstrated in short-term studies b) Extrapolation: Efficacy can be extrapolated directly from major to minor species physiologically related (tolerance) Mode of action Dose

Digestibility enhancers - Enzymes OPINION

Part I Part II Authorisation of feed additives in the European Union Assessment of feed additives that belong to the functional group Digestibility Enhancers Miscellanea

Miscellanea Community register of feed additives http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/animalnutrition/feed additives/comm_register_feed_additives_1831-03.pdf

Miscellanea FEEDAP Guidance Guidance documents provide detailed guidance to the applicants in the preparation and presentation of feed additives dossiers

S e n s o r y T e c h n o l o g i c a l N u t r i t i o n a l Z o o t e c h n I c a l C o c c i d i o s t a t Consumer/User Tolerance/efficacy Environment Re-evaluation Microbial studies Food additives Minor species Miscellanea

Miscellanea Experts http://www.efsa.europa.eu/efsa/aboutefsa/whoweare /efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178712806106.htm

Thanks for your attention Questions?