SPRING 2016 FACULTY & STAFF SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS. Department: Business Office Total Respondents: 60

Similar documents
SUMMER REGISTRATION SATISFACTION SURVEY 2010

Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2006 Member Survey Overall Report. Prepared by

Student Orientation Feedback Survey - June 25th Session

Texas A&M University Texarkana. Global Perspective Inventory General Form Report

Ruffalo Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Results: All Students Gallaudet University Spring 2018 Report

Psychology Department Assessment

COMMUNITY SERVICE OPPORTUNITY Cabrillo PEERS Team Peer Educator People Empowering Each other to Realize Success

Saint Mary s College High Potential Program Peer Mentor (FWS Position)

AY Assessment

Sexual Health- Rubber Lovers Fall 2013

Midwest University. Global Perspective Inventory New Student Report

Georgia Aging and Disability Resource Connection (ADRC) Evaluation Report

Friends Helping Friends Campus Suicide Prevention Program

Parent and Family Programs and Services Annual Report - Strategic The University of Memphis Admin (SA) - Parent Programs (Strategic)

Classroom as Community: Transfer Only Courses in the General Education Curriculum. Presentation Outline

Program Review October 2010

Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University First Year Experience Peer Mentor Program Application & Information Packet

2004 MAKING ACHIEVEMENT POSSIBLE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT

Peer Mentor Programs Job Application Packet

Alcohol Edu. Criterion 4 Documents. NCA Self Study. Eric Davidson. Eastern Illinois University Year 2014

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY School of Recreation, Health and Tourism. ATEP Therapeutic Interventions II (3) Spring 2015 FAX NUMBER:

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY School of Recreation, Health and Tourism. PHED Aerobics and Basic Conditioning (1) Spring 2015

College Student Homesickness: An Overview

Physics Department Student Climate Survey Report

EDSP 405 (undergraduate) or 505 (graduate) The Ziggurat Model: Designing Interventions for Students with ASD. Instructor: Robin Greenfield, Ph.D.

2008 Ohio State University. Campus Climate Study. Prepared by. Student Life Research and Assessment

Peer Mentor Position Description

THE ORGANISATION SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOLS VALUING PEOPLE 47

VPS PRACTICUM STUDENT COMPETENCIES: SUPERVISOR EVALUATION VPS PRACTICUM STUDENT CLINICAL COMPETENCIES

Disclosures. Background. Equipment 2/4/2015

Midwest University. Global Perspective Inventory Study Abroad Form Report

Gavino Garza. The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Department of Health and Human Performance (956)

Academic Professionals/Civil Service Quality of Life Survey

British Sign Language (BSL) College Action Plan

Sara Gardner, Autism Spectrum Navigators Program Director, Faculty

W&M Neurodiversity Initiative

Thriving in College: The Role of Spirituality. Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University

HESF 102 Fitness Walking Distance Education

Total agree 14.6% 14.1% 15.2% 14.5% 15.5% 13.7% 16.3% 12.7% 14.5% 16.6% Total disagree 70.0% 68.9% 70.8% 70.1% 69.6% 70.4% 71.2% 71.8% 68.7% 67.

Report of the Working Group on Late Night Activities May 2008

George Mason University College Education and Human Development

Spring 2017 Student Culture, Diversity, and Globalization Survey

Vital Statistics MS, Clinical Counseling Program

James L. Wolf R.B. Sherick

Kent State University Case Study Competition Submission. Group Leader: Danielle Rueger Emily Groce, Justin Beckman, Mel Dickey

Penn State Altoona Integrated care model Health services Counseling Services Disability Services Health Promotion

Sport and Exercise Science Undergraduate Practicum Application Packet Instructions

Towson University Center for Adults with Autism Towson, MD Adventure Pursuits for Adults with Autism

Taylor University s Intercultural Inventory Analysis. Presented by Natalie Nunes August 5, 2009

2. Organise and run events of specific interest and relevance to international students. This quarter was eventful.

Global Perspective Inventory (GPI) Report

A prospective pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of group education for endometriosis patients

Office of Multicultural Student Services Peer Mentor Application Fall 2017-Spring 2018 Academic Year

Mental Wellness of Students at Harvard Chan

Running head: CULMINATION PAPER 1. Culmination Paper. Emily Romo. Azusa Pacific University

Reducing Disproportionality in Challenging Situations. Nkenge Bergan & Cindy Green Kalamazoo Public Schools Urban Collaborative November 6, 2015

Student Wellness Peer Education Program Handbook North Dakota State University

2017 Dorm Life Survey March 23, 2018

7/29/2010. Medical Access 10% Genetics 30% Behavior 40% Social 15% Environment 5%

Study in psychology provides multiple perspectives

School of Social Work

A strong commitment to American Sign Language and the culture of Deaf people guides the department.

1. MSW Field practice (internship)

MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY DRUG POLICY

University of Georgia 2011 Global Perspectives Inventory Pilot Administration Results

Campus Recreation Programs, Services, and Facilities Survey

Collaborating with Academics to Provide Campus Recreation Fitness Programming

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY School of Recreation, Health, and Tourism. KINE : Exercise Physiology II (3) Fall 2014

Global Perspective Inventory (GPI) - Pilot Report

Standards and Criteria for Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists

EXSC354. La Sierra University Department of Health & Exercise Science College of Arts & Sciences. Course Description

SUNY Potsdam Administrative Unit Assessment Plan. Unit Contact -- Name: Gena Nelson Phone: Address:

This is a guide for volunteers in UTS HELPS Buddy Program. UTS.EDU.AU/CURRENT-STUDENTS/SUPPORT/HELPS/

Policy: Tobacco-Free Campus

Fraternity and Sorority Chapter Accreditation Program Spring 2019

Impact of Participating in the Mind-Body Medicine Course on Empathy, Mindfulness and Well-being

RDN827: Implant Dentistry I

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY School of Recreation, Health, and Tourism. PHED 131: Introduction to Pilates (1) Spring 2013 ( P1)

Q1 Where do you live on campus?

APOSW The Association of Pediatric Oncology Social Workers Standards of Practice

Course Description: Provides students with advanced knowledge and skills in Pilates techniques and exercises.

NEW YORK CITY COLLEGE of TECHNNOLOGY DENTAL HYGIENE DEPARTMENT

The University of Southern Mississippi College of Health Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences Spring 2016

University Training College (UTC) of UKCP

Peer Listening: Teaching Students to Support Each Other. Roshelle Kades Graduate Assistant Goucher College

Toastmasters District 55 New Member Orientation Guidelines

A Systems Approach to Improve the Timeliness and Impact of Mandated BASICS Interventions

New Student Registration & Family Orientation Program. Summer 2014

NTID Center on ACCESS TECHNOLOGY Rochester Institute of Technology National Technical Institute for the Deaf

GUIDELINES: CLINICAL EDUCATION SITES BOD G

Hartwick College Sexual Assault Campus Climate Survey Report. Percent Who Agree That the Number of Sexual Assaults is Low

Eastern Illinois University Vice President of Student Affairs

Hearing, Deaf, and Hard-of-Hearing Students Satisfaction with On-Line Learning

Profile youth in Aotearoa New Zealand

Eastern Michigan University School of Social Work Field Evaluation: MSW Advanced Concentration Mental Illness and Chemical Dependency

Hawaii School for the Deaf & the Blind

Short-Term Strategic Plan : Creating Conditions to be Ready for Transformation

POLICY STATEMENT 78 Serving, Possessing, and Consuming of Alcoholic Beverages

MASTER PROGRAMME IN LOGOPEDICS AUDITORY-VERBAL THERAPY AFTER COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION

Transcription:

Department: Business Office Respondents: 60 Instructions/Questions Response Distribution for the Business Office Business Office indicate how frequently the Business Office staff met your expectations on each criterion. Communicating with me as frequently as I would like. 2.2% 0% 10.9% 8.7% 78.3% 4.61 4.45 Clearly expressing themselves (verbally or in written form) 0% 0% 10.2% 10.2% 79.6% 4.69 4.57 Recognizing and showing concern for my needs. 0% 0% 11.5% 13.5% 75.0% 4.63 4.57 Delivering promises and commitments made to me in a 2.2% 0% 6.7% 13.3% 77.8% 4.64 4.45 Adhering to high interpersonal and ethical standards when 1.9% 0% 7.7% 13.5% 76.9% 4.63 4.65 Showing thorough understanding of services, policies, and 2.0% 0% 13.7% 13.7% 70.6% 4.51 4.54 Appearing organized and prepared when meeting with me. 2.0% 2.0% 8.2% 12.2% 75.5% 4.57 4.52 Instructions/Questions Response Distribution for the Business Office following Business Office characteristics. Neither Nor Business Office 2.0% 2.0% 14.0% 22.0% 60.0% 4.36 4.35 Variety of information, resources, and/or services 2.1% 0% 4.3% 34.0% 59.6% 4.49 4.42 Quality of information, resources, and/or services 1.9% 0% 7.7% 28.8% 61.5% 4.48 4.43 Overall satisfaction with information, resources, and/or 2.0% 0% 7.8% 29.4% 60.8% 4.47 4.43 services Overall satisfaction with staff performance. 1.9% 0% 11.3% 22.6% 64.2% 4.47 4.42 1 The total sample scores for this survey include responses focused on all units who participated in the Faculty & Staff Satisfaction Survey. For Spring 2016, those units included the Business Office, Information Technology, Life, and Institutional Data Management.

Department: Institutional Data Management (IDM) Respondents: 23 Instructions/Questions Response Distribution for IDM IDM indicate how frequently the IDM staff met your expectations on each criterion. Communicating with me as frequently as I would like. 4.8% 0% 9.5% 28.6% 57.1% 4.33 4.45 Clearly expressing themselves (verbally or in written form) 4.8% 0% 9.5% 19.0% 66.7% 4.43 4.57 Recognizing and showing concern for my needs. 4.8% 0% 9.5% 23.8% 61.9% 4.38 4.57 Delivering promises and commitments made to me in a 4.8% 0% 0% 28.6% 66.7% 4.52 4.45 Adhering to high interpersonal and ethical standards when 0% 0% 10.0% 20.0% 70.0% 4.60 4.65 Showing thorough understanding of services, policies, and 0% 4.8% 4.8% 23.8% 66.7% 4.52 4.54 Appearing organized and prepared when meeting with me. 4.8% 0% 0% 28.6% 66.7% 4.52 4.52 Instructions/Questions Response Distribution for IDM following IDM characteristics. Neither Nor IDM 4.8% 0% 4.8% 23.8% 66.7% 4.47 4.35 Variety of information, resources, and/or services 4.8% 0% 4.8% 23.8% 66.7% 4.48 4.42 Quality of information, resources, and/or services 4.8% 0% 4.8% 19.0% 71.4% 4.52 4.43 Overall satisfaction with information, resources, and/or 4.8% 0% 4.8% 19.0% 71.4% 4.52 4.43 services Overall satisfaction with staff performance. 0% 0% 4.8% 23.8% 71.4% 4.67 4.42

Instructions/Questions Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the following services provided by IDM. Response Distribution for IDM Neither Nor IDM Compiling and evaluating data, such as student 0% 5.0% 0% 35.0% 60.0% 4.50 enrollment, graduation and retention rates data, and degrees awarded. Designing and developing ad hoc and essential 0% 5.3% 0% 15.8% 78.9% 4.68 reports, utilizing various programming languages and software. Managing and analyzing various surveys. 0% 6.3% 0% 37.5% 56.3% 4.44 Coordinating assessment processes. 5.6% 0% 0% 33.3% 61.1% 4.44 Providing professional development opportunities in institutional effectiveness and assessment. 6.7% 0% 13.3% 33.3% 46.7% 4.13

Department: Information Technology (IT) Respondents: 76 Instructions/Questions Response Distribution for IT IT indicate how frequently the IT staff met your expectations on each criterion. Communicating with me as frequently as I would like. 0% 1.6% 7.9% 31.7% 58.7% 4.48 4.45 Clearly expressing themselves (verbally or in written form) 1.6% 1.6% 3.2% 30.2% 63.5% 4.52 4.57 Recognizing and showing concern for my needs. 1.6% 1.6% 4.8% 28.6% 63.5% 4.51 4.57 Delivering promises and commitments made to me in a 0% 3.2% 12.9% 25.8% 58.1% 4.39 4.45 Adhering to high interpersonal and ethical standards when 0% 1.7% 0% 16.9% 81.4% 4.78 4.65 Showing thorough understanding of services, policies, and 1.6% 0% 3.3% 31.1% 63.9% 4.56 4.54 Appearing organized and prepared when meeting with me. 0% 1.6% 6.6% 27.9% 63.9% 4.54 4.52 Instructions/Questions Response Distribution for IT following IT characteristics. Neither Nor IT 1.6% 4.8% 6.5% 29.0% 58.1% 4.37 4.35 Variety of information, resources, and/or services 3.2% 0% 3.2% 41.3% 52.4% 4.40 4.42 Quality of information, resources, and/or services 1.6% 1.6% 7.9% 31.7% 57.1% 4.41 4.43 Overall satisfaction with information, resources, and/or 1.6% 1.6% 3.2% 38.1% 55.6% 4.44 4.43 services Overall satisfaction with staff performance. 1.6% 0% 7.9% 33.3% 57.1% 4.44 4.42

Instructions/Questions Response Distribution for IT Using the response options provided, please rate Neither IT your level of satisfaction with the technology used on Nor campus during the current academic year. Blackboard LMS 3.6% 10.7% 7.1% 39.3% 39.3% 4.00 Other LMS 16.7% 0% 0% 0% 83.3% 4.33 Respondus Locksown Browser 12.5% 12.5% 0% 0% 75.0% 4.13 Turnitin.com 15.0% 5.0% 0% 25.0% 55.0% 4.00 Blackboard Collaborate 11.1% 0% 5.6% 38.9% 44.4% 4.06 NBC Learn 9.1% 0% 18.2% 18.2% 54.6% 4.09 Atomic Learning 4.8% 0% 0% 33.3% 61.9% 4.48 Google Apps for Education 13.3% 6.7% 0% 13.3% 66.7% 4.13 ShareStream Media 8.3% 0% 8.3% 25.0% 58.3% 4.25 Campus Pack 14.3% 0% 0% 14.3% 71.4% 4.29 Respondus 4 Campus 14.3% 0% 0% 14.3% 71.4% 4.29 Apple TV 14.3% 0% 14.3% 14.3% 57.1% 4.00 apps 9.1% 0% 9.1% 36.4% 45.5% 4.09 Instructions/Questions Using the response options provided, please rate your level of satisfaction with the following training sessions provided during the current academic year. Response Distribution for IT Neither Nor IT Accessibility 3.6% 0% 3.6% 21.4% 71.4% 4.57 Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) 6.3% 0% 12.5% 18.8% 62.5% 4.31 Quality Matters 4.2% 8.3% 0% 20.8% 66.7% 4.38 Instructions/Questions Response Distribution for IT IT Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statement. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 1.9% 0% 18.9% 37.7% 41.5% 4.17 By accessing Information Technology-related services online, I was able to take care of most or all of my related needs.

Department: Life Respondents: 22 Instructions/Questions Response Distribution for Life Life indicate how frequently the Life staff met your expectations on each criterion. Communicating with me as frequently as I would like. 0% 5.6% 16.7% 27.8% 50.0% 4.22 4.45 Clearly expressing themselves (verbally or in written form) 0% 5.6% 5.6% 22.2% 66.7% 4.50 4.57 Recognizing and showing concern for my needs. 0% 0% 10.5% 15.8% 73.7% 4.63 4.57 Delivering promises and commitments made to me in a 0% 0% 26.3% 10.5% 63.2% 4.37 4.45 Adhering to high interpersonal and ethical standards when 0% 0% 0% 16.7% 83.3% 4.83 4.65 Showing thorough understanding of services, policies, and 0% 5.6% 0% 22.2% 72.2% 4.61 4.54 Appearing organized and prepared when meeting with me. 0% 0% 21.1% 26.3% 52.6% 4.32 4.52 Instructions/Questions Response Distribution for Life following Life characteristics. Neither Nor Life 0% 0% 11.1% 33.3% 56.6% 4.44 4.35 Variety of information, resources, and/or services 0% 0% 5.6% 33.3% 61.1% 4.56 4.42 Quality of information, resources, and/or services 0% 0% 5.6% 38.9% 55.6% 4.50 4.43 Overall satisfaction with information, resources, and/or 0% 0% 5.3% 26.3% 68.4% 4.63 4.43 services Overall satisfaction with staff performance. 0% 0% 5.0% 35.0% 60.0^ 4.55 4.42

Please select the Life Programs that you have attempted to use or participate in during the current academic year. (Select all that apply.) Disability Services 38.1% (8) International Services 14.3% Judicial Affairs 4.8% Orientation: Freshmen SOAR 57.1% (12) Orientation: Transfer SOAR 57.1% (12) Recreation & Wellness 38.1% (8) Activities 61.9% (13) Government 4.8% University Housing 14.3% None 9.5%