Introduction of Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF) Karen Chan 16 May 2017

Similar documents
Concentration and diafiltration of cell-derived, live influenza virus using 750 C hollow fiber filter cartridge

THE ART TO CLEAR SOLUTIONS

Control of irreversible fouling by application of dynamic membranes

MMS AG Membrane Systems Milk Fractionation

Cross Flow Sampler Fouling Index

Journal of Membrane Science & Research

Physiology of Blood Purification: Dialysis & Apheresis. Outline. Solute Removal Mechanisms in RRT

The Study of Dynamic Milk Ultrafiltration Performance Influenced by Membrane Molecular Weight Cut off

Novel ceramic membranes for water purification and food industry Boffa, Vittorio

FOULING RESISTANT REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANES. Ja-young Koo, Sung Pyo Hong, Hoon Hyung, Young Hun Kim, Sungro Yoon, Soon Sik Kim

Data File. Sephadex ion exchange media. Ion exchange chromatography. Introduction. Sephadex ion exchangers General description

Introduction to Membrane

Influence of External Coagulant Water Types on the Performances of PES Ultrafiltration Membranes

ASSAYING OF THE FILTRATION PARAMETERS OF WHEY BY DIFFERENT FILTRATION SYSTEMS

BabyBio IMAC columns DATA SHEET DS

Successful Operation of Electrophoretic Lacquers

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT DEGUMMING PROCESSES ON MINOR COMPOUNDS IN CANOLA CRUDE OIL

Filtration Approaches to Sample Preparation and Cleanup. Golnar Javadi Application Engineer Sample Preparation Products

Anti-(bio)fouling composite membranes by Polyacrylic acid/poly(vinyl alcohol) electrospun layer

A REVIEW ON USING MEMBRANE REACTORS IN ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS OF CELLULOSE

TABLE OF CONTENT CHAPTER CONTENT PAGE

Application Note USD 2916 (1) Purification of Influenza Virus by Ion Exchange Chromatography on Mustang Q XT Membranes

PRODUCTION OF MICELLAR CASEIN CONCENTRATES USING CERAMIC MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES: OPTIMAL PROCESS DESIGN AND SYSTEM OPERATION.

Use of Capto ViralQ for the removal of genomic DNA from influenza virus produced in MDCK cells

Preparation and Application of SPPEES-TiO 2 Composite Micro-porous UF Membrane for Refinery Effluent Treatment

Separation of Polyphenolics and Sugar by Ultrafiltration: Effects of Operating Conditions on Fouling and Diafiltration

Study on the retentivity of the volatile components of simulated guava juice using ultrafiltration

1 Development of Membrane Processes 1 K. Smith. 1.1 Historical background Basic principles of membrane separations 3

Microfiltration Membranes

3. Valorization of olive oil waste streams by the development of thin film composite membranes for selective removal of polyphenols BGU, Dr. C.

Filtration Technology

TECHNICAL DATA SHEET GROWCLEAR PLUS

Food Ingredients. Equipment and Solutions for Food Ingredients and Starch

Permeation of organic molecules in water and ethanol-water solutions by reverse osmosis

The Effects of Antifoams on Ultrafiltration Membranes

TANNERY PROCESS REGULATION WITH ON LINE CHROMIUM (III) MONITORING

Vol. 10, No ABSTRACT

Depleting Lipoproteins from Serum

Biochemical Techniques 06 Salt Fractionation of Proteins. Biochemistry

DEMONSTRATING IMPROVED RO SYSTEM PERFORMANCE WITH NEW LOW DIFFERENTIAL (LD) TECHNOLOGY. Abstract

Novel technologies for blood purification Prof. Dr. Dimitrios Stamatialis

Ergovaline. [Methods listed in the Feed Analysis Standards] 1 Liquid chromatography Note 1, 2 [Feed Analysis Standards, Chapter 5, Section 2

Ultrafiltration as a method of separation of natural organic matter from water

TRANSPORT OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND NOM

Capturing lightning In A Bottle

Sephadex G-25 resins and prepacked formats

Liquid-Liquid Extraction Prof. Mukesh Doble Department Of Biotechnology Indian Institute Of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 19

Examination of Whey Degreasing by Modified Membrane Filtration

REMOVAL OF COLOR FROM THE RAW SUGAR MANU- FACTURING PROCESS BY MEMBRANE TREATMENT

FILTREC SUCTION FILTERS SECTION 19B. FilTers. FA-1 suction spin-on Fs-1 suction strainers Fs-7 in tank mounted suction strainers...

Mass Transfer, Fluid Flow and Membrane Properties in Flat and Corrugated Plate Hyperfiltration Modules

Study of the Effect of Nanoparticles and Surface Morphology on Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membrane Productivity

Flume Installation Instructions

Column chromatography for the development of pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccines

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

November 2015 Volume XXIX No. 2

Effect of Membrane Properties on Performance of Membrane Distillation for Ammonia Removal

Super Concentrated Coconut Water

PEEK SS Columns & Guard Columns

Development of an Organic-Inorganic PVDF/ anoclay Ultrafiltration Composite Membrane

utarwllnq and JProcessina

Potential of membrane separation processes in cheese whey fractionation and separation

HPLC. Varian Dynamax Preparative HPLC Columns

247 CMR BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY

Evaluation of anthocyanin content on blackberry juice (Rubus spp.) processed by microfiltration

Effects of membrane fouling on solute rejection during membrane filtration of activated sludge

Stax Disposable Depth Filters

PROGRESS OF OF NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES. 1 st Korea-US Nano Forum Kew-Ho Lee

Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch using Membrane Reactor

Sephadex G-25 media and prepacked formats

The use of dead-end and cross-flow nanofiltration to purify prebiotic oligosaccharides from reaction mixtures

EASI-EXTRACT FOLIC ACID Product Code: P81 / P81B

QuickSplitTM Flow Splitters

A New Era in SFC Column Technology

FORMULATION CHOICE. How and why they are chosen. Dr Andy Fowles On behalf of ECPA Specification Expert Group

Effect of ceramic membrane channel diameter on limiting retentate protein concentration during skim milk microfiltration 1

Increase The Sugar Concentration of The Solution Sugar by Reverse Osmotic Membrane

A Review of Membranes Classifications, Configurations, Surface Modifications, Characteristics and Its Applications in Water Purification

EASIMIP TM PATULIN Product Code: P250 / P250B

GE Healthcare Life Sciences. Quality matters. Whatman TM filters for air monitoring

Removal of VOCs from aqueous solutions using pervaporation process

109 IWA Publishing 2002 Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology AQUA

Final Report. Department of Water Resources. Project: Role of Microfiltration (MF) Cake Layer Composition and Stability in Desalination Efficiency

Separation of d-limonene from supercritical CO 2 by means of membranes

Effects of viscosity, pump mechanism and nozzle geometry on nasal spray droplet size

TWO-STAGE INTEGRATED CERAMIC MEMBRANE REACTOR SYSTEM FOR THE CONTINUOUS ENZYMATIC SYNTHESIS OF OLIGOSACCHARIDES

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

Membrane filtration in water recycling: removal of natural hormones

HPLC to UHPLC Transfer of USP Method for Amlodipine Besylate Using the Agilent 1290 Infinity II LC

New method of blood purification (Recycle Filtration System)

ACE CN-ES. Extra Stability. Extended Spacer. Enhanced Selectivity ACE. Combining CN polar selectivity with enhanced hydrophobicity

Sample Preparation Techniques for Biological Matrices: Finding the right balance to achieve optimal results

NANO 243/CENG 207 Course Use Only

Product Data Sheet July 2014

Contents. 01 Welded Syringe Filter Economy Syringe Filter Sterile Syringe Filter Membrane Filter 21

HPLC Analysis of Sugars

Modified cellulosic nanofiltration membrane with improved characteristics for desalination and concentration of reactive dyest

Environment Protection Engineering ULTRAFILTRATION OF DYE SOLUTIONS IN THE PRESENCE OF CATIONIC AND ANIONIC SURFACTANTS

QuickSplit TM Flow Splitters

Transcription:

Introduction of Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF) Karen Chan 16 May 2017

What you will learn TFF principles and applications in mammalian cell processes TFF vocabulary definitions and key process parameters TFF membrane selection 2

Types of Filtration Normal Flow Filtration (NFF) Cartridge or Dead-ended Filtration Flow is perpendicular to the filter media All fluid passes through the media Particles are retained in/on filter 3

Normal Flow Filtration Fluid Flow FILTER SURFACE 4 Operate Tangential Flow Filtration Process Equipment rev 4 May 2016

Types of Filtration Normal Flow Filtration (NFF) Cartridge or Dead-ended Filtration Flow is perpendicular to the filter media All fluid passes through the media Particles are retained in/on filter Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF) Cross-flow Filtration Flow is tangential (parallel) to the filter surface A small percentage of the fluid flows through the filter media Retained particles are swept away from filter surface 5

Tangential Flow Filtration Bulk Concentration C b Liquid Tangential Flow Wall Concentration Cw MEMBRANE SURFACE 6 Operate Tangential Flow Filtration Process Equipment rev 4 May 2016

Applications of TFF in the BioPharm Industry Upstream Cell Harvesting (concentration) - Bacterial or yeast cells (product is intra-cellular) Cell Culture Clarification - Mammalian cell (product is extra-cellular) Downstream Protein Concentration Buffer Exchange (Diafiltration) 7

Example of a Mammalian Cell Process 8

Basic TFF Applications Clarification - product passes through the membrane - larger particles / molecules retained by membrane Concentration - product retained by the membrane - solvent (buffer) passes through the membrane Diafiltration (Buffer Exchange) - product retained by the membrane - solvent (buffer) passes through the membrane - new solvent added to product 9

What you will learn TFF principles and applications in mammalian cell processes TFF vocabulary definitions and key process parameters TFF membrane selection 10

Generic TFF System Buffer Tank Feed Tank V o, C o Air Supply L P R Transfer Pump Q T Recycle Tank V R, C b P F P f Q f Feed (Recycle) Pump Q F Product Recovery TFF Device 11

TFF Module Feed Pressure Retentate Pressure Feed Flow Membrane Permeate Pressure Permeate Channel Feed Channel (Screened or Open) Permeate Channel Permeate Flow Retentate Flow 12

Channel Flows (QF, QR, Qf) Feed Pressure Q F = Feed Flow (L/hr) Permeate Channel Feed Channel (Screened or Open) Permeate Channel Retentate Pressure Q R = Retentate Flow (L/hr) Membrane Permeate Pressure Q f = Permeate Flow (L/hr) 13

Pressure Drop P [bar or psi] = P F P R Difference in pressure along membrane feed channel Resistance to feed flow in the channel Function of viscosity, feed flowrate, channel geometry Feed Pressure (P F ) Retentate Pressure (P R ) Feed Channel (Screened or Open) 30 psi 20 psi Permeate Channel Permeate Pressure 2 psi P = 30 20 psi = 10 psi 14

Transmembrane Pressure (TMP) TMP [bar or psi] = [(P F + P R ) / 2 - P f ] Average driving force across the membrane Created by applying retentate pressure Feed Pressure (P F ) Retentate Pressure (P R ) Feed Channel (Screened or Open) 30 PSI Permeate Channel 20 PSI Permeate Pressure (P f ) 2 PSI TMP = (30 + 20)/2-2 = 23 psi 15

Flux (J) J [Lm -2 h -1 ]= Q f / Membrane Area (time) Flux (J): permeate flow rate normalized for area of membrane it passes through Production capacity of the membrane Inlet Pressure Retentate Pressure Feed Channel (Screened or Open) 30 psi Permeate Channel 20 psi Permeate Pressure 2 psi J J = 2 L/min per 2.5 m² = 48 LMH 16

Membrane Polarization Concentration gradient from Cb at center of feed channel to more concentrated protein at Cw Reversible (varies with operating conditions) membrane Q F C b Q R C w membrane TMP Q f C f Q F = feed flow rate [L h -1 ] Q f = filtrate flow rate [L h -1 ] P F = feed pressure [bar] P R = retentate pressure[bar] P f = filtrate pressure [bar] C b = protein concentration in bulk solution [g L -1 ] C w = protein concentration at membrane [g L -1 ] C f = protein concentration in filtrate [g L -1 ] 17

Membrane Polarization No Membrane Polarization Controlled Membrane Polarization Uncontrolled Membrane Polarization 18

19 Polarization Mechanism and Flux

Polarization, TMP and Feed Flow Key point: Maintain membrane performance by balancing polarization (particle deposition) and removal TMP is the driving force creating flux Crossflow provides a sweeping cleaning action across the membrane surface Also affected by temperature and concentration TMP Crossflow 20

Retention & Passage Retentate Permeate % Retention % Passage % Passage = [ ] permeate [ ] retentate x 100 % Retention = 100 - % Passage Retention of protein X = 100 - (1 g/l permeate/100 g/l retentate) x 100 = 99 % 21

Volumetric Concentration Factor (VCF) VCF = V initial V final V initial 20 L of feedstock are ultrafiltered until 18 L have passed through the filtrate VCF = 20 L/ 2 L = 10 fold concentration V final Start Finish 22

Protein Concentration Factor (CF) CF = Final Protein concentration Initial Protein concentration V initial 20 L of feedstock are ultrafiltered until 18 L have passed through the filtrate VCF = 20 L/ 2 L = 10 fold concentration Start This 20 L feedstock contained 5 g/l of product and a concentration of 48 g/l was found in the retentate CF = 48 / 5 = 9.6 V final Finish 23

Diafiltration after concentration wash retentate with buffer PURIFICATION when is product YIELD ENHANCEMENT when is contaminant Example : Product is albumin and Contaminant is NaCl 24

Yield Yield = product recovered at end of process loss to permeate adsorption to membrane unrecoverable product due to hardware limitations V final Finish 25

What you will learn TFF principles and applications in mammalian cell processes TFF vocabulary definitions and key process parameters TFF membrane selection 26

Microfiltration Membrane Structure Micron pore size - 0.10-0.65 µm NMWL - 500 kd - 3000 kd Separate cells and cell debris from proteins Durapore (PVDF) Durapore GVVP 0.2um magnified 650x 27

Ultrafiltration Membrane Structure Micron pore size - 0.001-0.10 µm NMWL - 1 kd - 500 kd Separate proteins from low molecular weight contaminants Ultracel (regenerated cellulose) Biomax (polyethersulfone) Biomax 30 kd magnified 1000x 28

TFF Membranes - Chemistry Membrane Chemistry Microfiltration - PVDF (Durapore ) - Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration - Low Binding Polyethersulfone (Biomax ) - Composite Regenerated Cellulose (Ultracel ) Durapore GVVP 0.2um magnified 650x 29

Ultrafiltration Membrane Structure Classical membrane with voids Biomax membrane with homogenous microporous support 30

Destructive Test : UF Membrane Qualification UF membrane are labelled by "Nominal Molecular Weight Limit" (NMWL) Does it specify the membrane? NO! Why? - There is no standard definition for NMWL among manufacturers Typically suppliers uses Protein markers 31

Destructive Test : UF Membrane Qualification : Mixed Dextran Mixed Dextran testing uses a polydisperse mixture of Dextran molecules and maps the entire retention profile of the membrane allowing better reproducibility batch-to-batch tighter specifications meaningful QA/QC release But, there is NO correlation between retention and non-destructive integrity test results 32

Choices in Selecting a Filter Module type Channel turbulence promoter (screen) Membrane pore size Membrane material 33

TFF Filter Types 34

Filter Module Selection Flat-Plate (Cassette) - most prevalent for bioprocessing, especially MAbs - efficient packing density and mass transfer - wide choice of membranes and screens - simple linear scale-up and scale-down Spiral - good lower-cost option for very large operations Hollow Fiber - requires high pumping rates for effective mass transfer Stirred Cell - useful for screening studies only 35

TFF Device Characteristics Pellicon 2 and Pellicon 3 Cassettes Flat Sheet Membrane Device Linear Scalability Screened Retentate Flow Channel Highest Efficiency - highest flux at given cross-flow velocity in feed channel Smallest Working Volume and Hold-up Volume Minimal Floor Space 36

Filter Pore Size Rules of Thumb For a product that will be retained, use: NMWL = 1/3-1/5 product size target a product retention > 0.995 Example: 150kD MAb should use 30kD membrane For a product passing to filtrate, use: NMWL = 3-5X product size target a product retention < 0.2-0.4 37

Selecting a Membrane for a Separation Understand the solvent ph Ionic strength Viscosity Processing Conditions Prefiltration / Pretreatment Temperature Time / Frequency Hardware restrictions Cleaning / Sanitizing chemical selection Personnel Restrictions 38

Some Membrane Selection Questions Will it be UF / MF? Solute size / characteristics Membrane performance What is the required solvent compatibility? Solvent type / concentration Are there any issues with cleaning chemicals Compatibility / Exposure / Validation What are the membrane binding / adsorption characteristics Initial & final protein concentration is important What are the yield / retention issues? Remember UF membranes are not totally retentive Establish acceptable standards first 39

Summary We have reviewed TFF principles and applications in mammalian cell processes TFF vocabulary definitions and key process parameters TFF membrane selection 40