Radiation Protection

Similar documents
Review of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection

Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation & Commonly Used Radiation Units

Biological Effects of Radiation KJ350.

Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation & Commonly Used Radiation Units

Radiation Safety Information for Students in Courses given by the Nuclear Physics Group at KTH, Stockholm, Sweden

Radiation Health Effects

Radiopharmaceuticals. Radionuclides in NM. Radionuclides NUCLEAR MEDICINE. Modes of radioactive decays DIAGNOSTIC THERAPY CHEMICAL COMPOUND

Learning Objectives. Review of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection. Radiation Effects

GUIDELINES ON IONISING RADIATION DOSE LIMITS AND ANNUAL LIMITS ON INTAKE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

Laboratory Safety 197/405. Types of Radiation 198/405

Radiation Carcinogenesis

Radiation Safety. Bethany Gillett 14th Feb After this lecture, you should be able to:

CONTENTS NOTE TO THE READER...1 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS...3

Cancer Risk Factors in Ontario. Other Radiation

Radioactivity. Lecture 8 Biological Effects of Radiation

ICRP = International Commission on. recommendations and guidance on. Functioning since 1928.

ICRP Recommendations Evolution or Revolution? John R Cooper Main Commission

BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF

Chem 481 Lecture Material 3/11/09

The Basics of Radiation Safety

Radiation Protection in Laboratory work. Mats Isaksson, prof. Department of radiation physics, GU

Radiation dosimetry, radiation protection and measurements

RADIATION RISK ASSESSMENT

Radiation Safety for New Medical Physics Graduate Students

ICRP RECOMMENDATIONS AND IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS: THEN AND NOW

Recent Progress in Radiation Dosimetry for Epidemiology and Radiological Protection. John Harrison ICRP Committee 2

IONIZING RADIATION, HEALTH EFFECTS AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES

Radiation Protection Program Update: The Details. July 2010

Biological Effects of Radiation

Basic radiation protection & radiobiology

Radiation physics and radiation protection. University of Szeged Department of Nuclear Medicine

Dosimetric Consideration in Diagnostic Radiology

2005 RECOMMENDATIONS OF ICRP

Ionizing Radiation. Nuclear Medicine

Lecture 14 Exposure to Ionizing Radiation

Radioactivity. Alpha particles (α) :

1. The Accident of Chernobyl Unit 4 of 1,000 MWe Graphite-Moderated Boiling Water Pressure Tube Reactor in 1986

Annex X of Technical Volume 4 RADIATION AND HEALTH EFFECTS AND INFERRING RADIATION RISKS FROM THE FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI ACCIDENT

QUANTIFICATION OF THE RISK-REFLECTING STOCHASTIC AND DETERMINISTIC RADIATION EFFECTS

NEUTRONS. 1. Exposure Data

ARRT Specifications Radiation Exposure & Monitoring

Medical Physics 4 I3 Radiation in Medicine

What is radiation quality?

Ionizing Radiation. Alpha Particles CHAPTER 1

Ernest Rutherford:

PHY138Y Nuclear and Radiation

Radiologic Units: What You Need to Know

LET, RBE and Damage to DNA

Sources of Data of Stochastic Effects of Radiation. Michael K O Connor, Ph.D. Dept. of Radiology, Mayo Clinic

Managing the imaging dose during Image-guided Radiotherapy. Martin J Murphy PhD Department of Radiation Oncology Virginia Commonwealth University

Targeted Alpha Particle Therapy: Imaging, Dosimetry and Radiation Protection

Core Concepts in Radiation Exposure 4/10/2015. Ionizing Radiation, Cancer, and. James Seward, MD MPP

Sources of ionizing radiation Atomic structure and radioactivity Radiation interaction with matter Radiation units and dose Biological effects

UQ X-ray Safety Training Module

BEIR VII: Epidemiology and Models for Estimating Cancer Risk

ACUTE RADIATION SYNDROME: Diagnosis and Treatment

Ionizing Radiation. Michael J. Vala, CHP. Bristol-Myers Squibb

Health Physics and the Linear No-Threshold Model

3 rd International Symposium on the System of Radiological Protection Seoul, October John Harrison

Space Radiation Risks for Long. Duration Missions Edward Semones

Radiation Safety For Anesthesiologists. R2 Pinyada Pisutchareonpong R2 Nawaporn Sateantantikul Supervised by Aj Chaowanan Khamtuicrua

The Linear No-Threshold Model (LNT): Made to Be Tested, Made to Be Questioned. Richard C. Miller, PhD Associate Professor The University of Chicago

Genome Instability is Breathtaking

AN INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR MEDICINE

RADON RESEARCH IN MULTI DISCIPLINES: A REVIEW

RADIATION HAZARDS. A dabbler s perspective. Jess H. Brewer

1/31/2014. Radiation Biology and Risk to the Public

Dosimetry - Measurement of Ionising Radiation

PRINCIPLES AND METHODS OF RADIATION PROTECTION

Nature of Radiation and DNA damage

Radiological Protection Countermeasures after TEPCO Fukushima NPP Accident -Who should play the role of risk communication-

Fukushima: What We All Should Know about Radiation

The Principles of Radiation Monitoring and the Radiation Protection System in Hong Kong. H.M.Mok Physicist Radiation Health Unit Department of Health

Introduction. Chapter 15 Radiation Protection. Advisory bodies. Regulatory bodies. Main Principles of Radiation Protection

REVIEW Nuclear Disaster after the Earthquake and Tsunami of March 11

Basic definitions. Dosimetry, radiation protection. Nuclear measurement techniques. Interaction of the nuclear radiation with the matter

Radiation in Everyday Life

Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Radiation. Tim Marshel R.T. (R)(N)(CT)(MR)(NCT)(PET)(CNMT)

Skyscan 1076 in vivo scanning: X-ray dosimetry

Radiation doses and cancer incidence (excluding thyroid cancer) due to the Chernobyl accident

ALTERNATIVES TO THE EFFECTIVE DOSE FOR STOCHASTIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN MEDICAL IMAGING

RADIOLOGY AN DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING

Effects of Radiation on Human In the Face of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident

Practice and Risk at Medical Facilities in Agency Operations

DRAFT REPORT FOR CONSULTATION: DO NOT REFERENCE. Annals of the ICRP ICRP PUBLICATION 1XX

Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Module 8 - AAPM/RSNA Curriculum. Basic Radiation Biology

Olowookere, C.J. Dept of Physics Ajayi Crowther University, Oyo

PHYSICS 2: HSC COURSE 2 nd edition (Andriessen et al) CHAPTER 20 Radioactivity as a diagnostic tool (pages 394-5)

DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION

Indoor emissions. foams) > CH 2 =O; plasticizers, especially dialkyl phthalates. Especially a problem with mobile homes. - Regulations in Sweden

Epidemiological Studies on the Atomic-bomb Survivors (Handout)

Sodium Iodide I 131 Solution. Click Here to Continue. Click Here to Return to Table of Contents

6) Radiation Protection (1) Radiation effects in biological material (cells)

Understanding Radiation and Its Effects

Public and Worker Health Impacts from the Fukushima Nuclear Plant Accident Thomas McKone, PhD & James Seward, MD, MPP

RADIOACTIVITY & RADIATION CHARACTERISTICS

Application of the Commission's Recommendations for the Protection of People in

APPENDIX G - Organ/Tissue Weighting Factors and Detriment/Risk Coefficients

ICRP 128 ICRP ICRP ICRP 1928

Radiation Oncology. Initial Certification Qualifying (Computer-based) Examination: Study Guide for Radiation and Cancer Biology

Transcription:

2007 CERN Accelerator School (The bases of) Radiation Protection Marco Silari CERN, Geneva, Switzerland M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 1

Introduction To tell you in one hour all about radiation protection is a Mission Impossible IV Radiobiological bases Prompt radiation produced by accelerator operation Residual radioactivity Radiation shielding Rules and regulations Operational radiation protection Monitor instrumentation Individual dosimetry Etc M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 2

Objective of radiation protection Whenever a particle (charged or neutral) or a photon of sufficient energy (E > Eth and E > Coulomb barrier) hits a nucleus, a nuclear reaction takes place. The reaction induces emission of particles and/or photons (prompt radiation) and generally leaves behind a residual nucleus which is radioactive, that is emits delayed radiation. The use of proton and electron accelerators for particle physics, applied physics, industrial or medical uses, generates radiation and involves the potential exposure of people (workers and members of the public) to (prompt) radiation escaping from the shielding structures, to ( delayed ) residual radioactivity in the accelerator, beam lines, targets, etc, and the release of radioactivity into the environment. The aim of Radiation Protection is to prevent - by shielding, interlocks, procedures, etc - direct detrimental effects (death and tissue reactions), and to limit the probability of stochastic effects to levels deemed by society to be acceptable. The topics covered in this lecture include: 1. Quantities and units 2. Effects of radiation 3. Determining the risks M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 3

Units The activity of a radioactive source is its rate of decay = number of disintegrations per second The unit of activity is the Becquerel 1 Bq = 1 s -1 The half-life of a radionuclide is the time necessary for half of the nuclei present in the sample to decay The biological half-life is the time required for the body to eliminate half of an administered dose of any substance by metabolic processes of elimination. It is approximately the same for both stable and radioactive isotopes of a particular element. M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 4

Units Rule-of-thumb (probably very obvious): the shorter the half-life, the fastest the build-up, the fastest the decay 1.0x10 6 8.0x10 5 6.0x10 5 A = A s dec ( 1 e ) e t /τ t /τ irr a j (t) 4.0x10 5 2.0x10 5 0.0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Time (s) It takes about 5 half-lives to reach saturation of activity M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 5

Health effects There are two types of health effects caused by radiation: Tissue reactions (also called non stochastic effects or deterministic effects) Stochastic effects The quantity in use for tissue reactions is the absorbed dose, D When particles other than photons and electrons (low-let radiation) are involved, an RBE-weighted dose may be used. M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 6

Linear Energy Transfer (LET) Linear energy transfer (LET) Mean energy lost by charged particles in electronic collisions per unit track length. Low-LET radiation X-rays and gamma rays or light charged particles such as electrons that produce sparse ionizing events far apart at a molecular scale (L < 10 kev/μm). High-LET radiation Neutrons, heavy charged particles that produce ionizing events densely spaced at a molecular scale (L > 10 kev/μm). M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 7

Units The absorbed dose in a point is defined as the ratio of the mean energy imparted by ionizing radiation to the matter in a volume element and the mass of the matter in this volume element: D = dε dm The unit of absorbed dose is the Gray: 1 Gy = 1 J/kg M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 8

Radiobiological effectiveness (RBE) The RBE of a given radiation is the reciprocal of the ratio of the absorbed dose of that radiation to the absorbed dose of a reference radiation (usually x-rays) required to produce the same degree of biological effect M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 9

Units For purpose of radiation protection, a quantity that correlates better with the more important deleterious effects of exposure to radiation, more particularly with the delayed stochastic effects, is the dose equivalent H = Q. D The unit of dose equivalent is the Sievert: 1 Sv = 1 J/kg Q is a conventional factor called Quality factor applied to the absorbed dose at a point to take into account the biological effectiveness of the charged particles producing the absorbed dose. M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 10

Quality factor For a particular radiation, the value of Q was derived by extrapolating RBE values obtained at high dose levels down to the dose levels of relevance in radiation protection and then selecting a value of relevance to radiation hazards. Although the dose equivalent seems to be a not measurable quantity, in radiation protection a quantity is considered as measurable if a method of measurement is available which directly yields the value of the quantity to be measured properly designed instrumentation M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 11

Units The Bq is a small unit so that activities are often measured in kbq, MBq, etc, however the radiotoxicity depends on the radionuclide: for example, 1 kbq of the α-emitter 241 Am if ingested will give you a dose of 27 msv, higher than the annual limit for occupationally exposed workers You need 4.2 Gray to raise the temperature of one litre of water by 10-3 C, however a whole body dose of 1 Gy received in a short time will give you severe radiation sickness and a whole body dose of 4 Gy is very likely to be lethal M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 12

Quantities (currently) in use in radiation protection Protection quantities defined for the human body by the ICRP and employed as reference parameters in the general recommendations. Operational quantities defined by the ICRU and employed for demonstrate, by means of measurements, compliance with the system of protection. M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 13

Physical, protection and operational quantities Radiation protection dosimetry is based on the knowledge of conversion coefficients both for calculations and measurements M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 14

Protection quantities Mean absorbed dose in an organ or tissue: D T = 1 m T m T Ddm Equivalent dose in an organ or tissue: H T = w R D T,R D T,R is the absorbed dose averaged over the organ or tissue T due to radiation R w R is the radiation weighting factor for radiation R M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 15

Radiation weighting factors (ICRP 1990) Type and energy of radiation R Radiation weighting factor, w R Photons, all energies 1 Electrons and muons, all energies 1 Neutrons: <10 kev 5 10 to 100 kev 10 > 0.1 to 2 MeV 20 > 2 to 20 MeV 10 > 20 MeV 5 Protons, other than recoil protons, E > 2 MeV ICRP 2007 (protons and charged pions) Alpha particles, fission fragments, heavy nuclei 5 (2) 20 M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 16

Radiation weighting factors (ICRP 2007) Values for neutrons replaced by a continuous function in ICRP 2007 M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 17

Protection quantities In order to take into account the not uniform irradiation of the human body and the different susceptibility to radiation of different organs and tissues, the ICRP defined the concept of Effective dose: E = Σ T w T H T H T is the equivalent dose in tissue or organ T w T is the weighting factor for tissue T In most countries, the legal limits are for workers: 20 msv/year (over a 12 month period) for members of the public: 1 msv/year M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 18

Tissue weighting factors (ICRP 2007) Bone-marrow, Colon, Lung, Breast, Stomach, Remainder Tissues 0.12 Gonads 0.08 Bladder, Esophagus, Liver, Thyroid 0.04 Bone surface, Brain, Salivary glands, Skin 0.01 M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 19

Protection quantities Upcoming new definition of Effective Dose (2007 Recommendations of the ICRP) E M H + = T wt T 2 H F T The sum includes also the terms of the gonads (ovaries and testes), the male and the female breast and the male and female remainder M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 20

Operational quantities for external exposure Operational quantities are aimed at providing an estimate or upper limit for the value of the protection quantities related to an exposure: H prot H oper 1 For external exposure: Operational quantities for area monitoring Ambient dose equivalent, H*(10), expressed in Sv, measured by monitoring instrumentation properly designed and calibrated Operational quantities for individual monitoring Personal dose equivalent, H p (d), also expressed in Sv, measured by a dosimeter worn on the body M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 21

Exposure to natural and man-made radiation Exposures from natural radiation: (may vary by a factor of 3 in average) altitude and cosmic radiation terrestrial radiations (monazite, volcanic regions, etc.) internal β and γ deposited radionuclides from medical irradiations diagnostic medicine (dental x rays, radiography, CT) diagnostic radiopharmaceutical (imaging techniques) M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 22

Natural sources of radiation Cosmic rays Cosmogenic radioactive nuclides ( 14 C, 7 Be, 3 H) Terrestrial (radionuclides present in the earth crust, U, Th, Ra, Rn ) Human Body (radionuclides present in our body, mainly 40 K) M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 23

Background radiation from cosmic rays and natural sources (From BEIR 7, 2006) M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 24

Cosmic radiation levels sea level 1000 m 2000 m civil flight altitude (13 km) ~ 0.03 µsv/h ~ 0.1 µsv/h ~ 0.2 µsv/h ~ 5 µsv/h supersonic flight altitude (17-20 km) ~ 13 µsv/h (Concorde [ now deceased], spy planes) space shuttle Outer space or Mars surface ~ 15-30 µsv/h ~ 35-45 µsv/h (300-400 msv/year) M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 25

Cosmic ray exposure on commercial flights Average annual effective dose to aircrew 3 msv (250000 monitored persons) The integral dose equivalent received during a return flight Geneva - Los Angeles is about 100 μsv (if the pilots pay attention to the route and you manage to get there ) M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 26

Natural and man-made radiation exposures (From BEIR 7, 2006) M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 27

Medical exposures Conventional X rays CT scan Interventional procedures Type of examination Chest (AP Lat.) Skull (AP Lat.) Lumbar spine (AP) Mammogram (4 views) Dental (Lat.) Dental (Panoramic) Abdomen Head Chest Abdomen Pelvis Angioplasty (heart study) Coronary angiogram Intravenous pyelogram (kidney 6 films) Absorbed dose (msv) 0.02-0.04 0.03-0.01 0.7 0.7 0.02 0.09 1.2 2.0 8.0 10.0 10.0 7.5-57.0 4.6-15.8 2.5 From: Health Physics Society 2006 M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 28

What is a low dose? Low Doses Medium Doses 0 100 mgy >100 mgy 1 Gy High Doses > 1 Gy Including doses used in radiation therapy (localized irradiation, 20-60 Gy) M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 29

Extrapolating cancer risk at low doses Assumptions: No threshold Dose response is linear at low doses M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 30

Epidemiology Risk and rates are the basic measures to compare disease occurrence in exposed and unexposed population. Rate = incidence of new cases of a disease related to a population of 100000. It is time dependent and depends also on the starting point and the length of the interval. It is function of age at exposure, sex, type of cancer Excess Absolute Risk = rate of disease in an exposed population minus the rate of disease in an unexposed population Lifetime absolute risk (40 years following irradiation) EAR = 5% Sv -1 M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 31

From where the information come from? Hiroshima & Nagasaki (86572 individuals ) Chernobyl (2240000 under control in 2005, 94% of liquidators, 89% of evacuees, 85% of residents of radioactively contaminated territory, 79% of children directly or indirectly (643000 children born to the accident liquidators) affected by the accident) Accidents Occupational exposures (600000 workers in the nuclear industry) Radiation therapy patients M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 32

General findings from Hiroshima & Nagasaki Younghave higher cancer relative and absolute risks than older people Womenhave higher cancer risk for most solid cancers than men 86572 individuals from 1950-1990 334 cancers due to radiation exposure / 7578 deaths for solid tumours. 87/249 Leukaemia deaths due to radiation By 1991 48000 people alive Life span follow-up M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 33

Atomic bomb survivors Group Degree of severity First week Second week Third week Approximate mortality Time of death (weeks) Very severe (5-6 Gy) Nausea, vomiting Fever, apathy, delirium, diarrhoea, Oropharingeal lesions Fever, Emaciacion, Leukopenia, Haemorrhagic diathesis, epilation 100% First and second Severe (2-4.5 Gy) Nausea, vomiting, anorexia, fatigue Fever, Leukopenia Anaemia Anorexia, emaciacion, fever, diarrhoea, epilation, oropharingeal lesions, Haemorragic diathesis +++, Leukopenia ++, Anaemia ++ 50% Third to sixth Moderately severe (2-3 Gy) Gastrointestinal syndrome Leukopenia Anorexia, emaciacion, fever, diarrhoea, epilation, oropharingeal lesions + to ++, Haemorragic diathesis + to ++, Leukopenia ++, Anaemia + Less than 10% Sixth or later Mild (1-2 Gy) Gastrointestinal syndrome Leukopenia Fever +, epilation +, oropharingeal lesions +, Haemorragic diathesis +, Leukopenia + None Source: UNSCEAR M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 34

From DNA to cellular effects 1. P53 protein arrests the cell cycle and controls apoptosis (programmed cell death) preventing damaged cells to progress into a proliferation or malignant state. Human tumours show deficiency in apoptotic response. Specific DNA damage by radiation signals apoptosis. 2. Activation of proto-oncogenes by chromosomal translocation. 3. Onset of genomic instability (critical event for tumor genesis) 4. Repair of DNA lesions may be error prone M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 35

Radiation damage at DNA level DNA single and double strand breaks damage. Failure to repair DNA damage produce mutations (point mutations, deletions, insertions, translocations) Humans inherit 3 x 10 9 base pairs of DNA from each parent. Each cell has therefore 6 x 10 9 base pairs of DNA. It has been estimated that in normal conditions each new cell contains some 120 new mutations. micronuclei Ionizing radiations and chemicals have proved mutational capability. Chromosome aberration M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 36

Bystander effects or non targeted effects Irradiated cells transmit damage signals to non irradiated cells that received no radiation (oxidative stress modulating signal transduction and micronucleus formation). 90% of mutations in bystander cells after low doses of α rays are point mutations, whereas in DNA repair deficient cells 80% of the mutants show partial or total gene deletions. Second neoplastic transformations events with transmissible genetic instability (visible as micronuclei) which is dose dependent. Delayed reproductive failure many generations after irradiations. Possible trans-generational effects of radiations due to induction of genomic instability in germ cells. M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 37

Factors influencing the response of a biological system Physical: type of radiation [x, γ, n, α] type of exposure internal [by inhalation or ingestion] external local or total body irradiation absorbed dose spatial distribution of the absorbed dose (track structure) time distribution of the absorbed dose Biological: intrinsic characteristics of the irradiated biological system: radiation sensitivity (or resistance), number of cells exposed to radiation, kinetics/metabolism, repair capability biological environment: oxygenation, nutrition, etc. M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 38

Effects of whole body irradiation Dose Limits < 1 Gy 1-2 Gy 2-6 Gy 6-10 Gy 10-15 Gy >50 Gy Vomiting No 5-50% 100% 100% 100% 100% Delay - 3 2 1 30 min 30 min Therapy Psychotherapy Psycho-therapy Haematological observation Blood- Transfusion Antibiotics Bone Marrow Transplant Electrolyte balance Symptomatic Prognosis Excellent Excellent Guarded Guarded Poor Hopeless Lethality 0 0 0-80% 80-100% 90-100% 100% Time of Death - - 2 months 2 months 2 weeks 2 days M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 39

LD50 & acute effects Whole body dose (Gy) Organ or tissue failure responsible for death Time at which death occurs after exposure (days) 3-5 Bone marrow 30-60 5-15 Intestine and lungs 10-20 >15 Nervous system 1-5 Lethal effects: LD50 for humans 3-5 Gy due to damage to bone marrow, in absence of bone marrow transplantation M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 40

Acute effects Skin: 8-30 days Initial erythema: 1-3 days Desquamation: 2-3 weeks Deep erythema: 3-4 weeks Necrosis: 2-3 weeks M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 41

Late effects: cataract Lens opacities in the posterior part of the lens followed by cataract. Latency inversely related to dose. Cataract 2-10 Gy single dose or fractionated doses Radiation opacities observed at Chernobyl, astronauts, CT scan, occurs after 250 msv Retinopathy and other ocular damage at doses < 5 Sv M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 42

Stochastic effects and others Leukemia Solid cancers Thyroid cancers Cardiovascular diseases M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 43

Justification, optimization and limitation of doses Justification: any practice involving exposure to radiation should produce sufficient benefit to the exposed individuals or to society to offset the radiation detriment it causes Optimization: process to keep the magnitude of individual doses, the number of people exposed As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) below the appropriate dose limits, economic and social factors being taken into account. Limits: exposure of radiation workers and individuals of public must not exceed Dose Limits E < 20 msv / 12 months annual limits for skin and extremities (150 msv for the lens of the eye, 500 msv for the skin, hands and feet) M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 44

How to reduce exposure to ionizing radiation When in presence of a source of radiation, make use of distance, time, shielding Distance: the dose rate decreases with the inverse squared of the distance (from a point-like source) Time: the dose is proportional to the time spent close to the source D = dd/dt x t Shielding: the dose rate approximately reduces as exp(-d/λ) λ = shielding properties of the material for β radiation: plexiglass for γ radiation: iron or lead for n: concrete M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 45

Acknowledgements I am indebted to my colleague Marilena Streit- Bianchi (CERN) from providing me with the radiobiology material I have shown you today M. Silari Radiation Protection 21.09.2007 46