Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Similar documents
Department of Urology, Cochin hospital Paris Descartes University

The importance of maximal restoration of peri-prostatic support

Intraoperative Identification and Monitoring of the Somatic Nerves Critical to Potency Preservation during da Vinci Prostatectomy

da Vinci Prostatectomy

Robotics, Laparoscopy & Endosurgery

Intussusception of the bladder neck does not promote early restoration to urinary continence after non-nervesparing radical retropubi c prostatectomy

Overview of All SEER-Medicare Publications

The Surgical Procedure Is the Most Important Factor Affecting Continence Recovery after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Post Radical Prostatectomy Incontinence: Etiology and Prevention

da Vinci Prostatectomy My Greek personal experience

european urology 55 (2009)

RECTAL INJURY IN UROLOGIC SURGERY. Inadvertent rectal injury from a urologic procedure is often subtle but has serious postoperative consequences.

Open Retropubic Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Statistics in Virginia - Maps. July

Appropriate preoperative membranous urethral length predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

Cancer of the Breast (Female) - Cancer Stat Facts

Pioneering Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in The Pretoria Urology Hospital and the South African urological environment:

Diet, Physical Activity, Weight & Cancer Survivorship: Perspectives from the NCI

Percent Surviving 5 Years 89.4%

Colorectal Cancer Statistics in Virginia - Maps. July

Robotic Surgery for Prostate Cancer: A Realistic Approach to Getting Started The Evolution of a Robotic Surgeon

Open RRP versus LRP in Asian Men. International Braz J Urol Vol. 35 (2): , March - April, 2009

Facing Prostate Cancer?

of the anatomic relationship between urethral sphincter complex and zones of prostrate in young Chinese males on MRI

Current Technique of Open Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing Retropubic Prostatectomy

Indication,Technique and Outcome of Retropubic Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

How to select the right patient for the right treatment: What role does sexuality play in Pca treatment?

Index. urologic.theclinics.com. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Laparoscopic Surgery. The Da Vinci Robot. Limits of Laparoscopy. What Robotics Offers. Robotic Urologic Surgery: A New Era in Patient Care

Learning Curve of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy With 60 Initial Cases by a Single Surgeon

Dorsal vein complex preserving technique for intrafascial nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Nerve-Sparing Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy

Robot Assisted-Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) and

The visualization of periprostatic nerve fibers using Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging with tractography

Inception Cohort. Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Oxford VIP-- Inception Cohort (2008) Nov Dec

Open Prostatectomy is Best

Impact of Posterior Urethral Plate Repair on Continence Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Positive Surgical Margins in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Impact of Learning Curve on Oncologic Outcomes

Clinical Study A Comparison of Radical Perineal, Radical Retropubic, and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomies in a Single Surgeon Series

Comparative Analysis Research of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

TME and autonomic nerve preservation techniques: based on Video and Cadaveric anatomy

Bladder replacement in men and women: when and when not? Outline. Continent Diversion History

I-STOP TOMS Transobturator Male Sling

Pathologic Outcomes during the Learning Curve for Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Posterior Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction During Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial

Citation for published version (APA): Haber, G. P. (2010). Application of emerging technologies to urologic oncology

Prostate Cancer. David Wilkinson MD Gulfshore Urology

A New Postoperative Predictor of Time to Urinary Continence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: The Urine Loss Ratio

disfunzioni sessuali ed urinarie: come evitarle? D. Mascagni

Lecture 56 Kidney and Urinary System

POTENCY, CONTINENCE AND COMPLICATIONS IN 3,477 CONSECUTIVE RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMIES

An Anteriorly Positioned Midline Prostatic Cyst Resulting in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

State-of-the-art: vision on the future. Urology

Facing Prostate Cancer Surgery? Learn about minimally invasive da Vinci Surgery

BJUI. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)

Clinical Study Retrograde Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Description of a New Technique and Early Perioperative Outcomes

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 38: ,

Potency after unilateral nerve sparing surgery: a report on functional and oncological results of unilateral nerve sparing surgery

Original Paper. Curr Urol 2015;9: DOI: /

Utility of Prostate MRI. John R. Leyendecker, MD

RADICAL CYSTECTOMY. Solutions for minimally invasive urologic surgery

Objective. Patients and Methods. Conclusion. Results. Keywords. Introduction

Intrafascial versus interfascial nerve sparing in radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Erectile Function Before and After Non-Nerve-Sparing Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy

Policy #: 370 Latest Review Date: April 2017

Index. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 14 (2005) Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy

TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION

Detrusor underactivity is prevalent after radical prostatectomy: a urodynamic study including risk factors

Tomonori Yamanishi,* Tomoya Mizuno, Miho Watanabe, Mikihiko Honda and Ken-Ichiro Yoshida

Surgical Techniques A Comparison of Outcomes for Interfascial and Intrafascial Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy

Policy #: 370 Latest Review Date: December 2013

Prostate cancer staging and datasets: The Nitty-Gritty. What determines our pathological reports? 06/07/2018. Dan Berney Maastricht 2018

100 patients who underwent RRP for biopsy-confirmed prostatic malignancy and MRI for preoperative staging.

RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

SCIENTIFIC PAPER ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS

Urodynamic study before and after radical porstatectomy 가톨릭의대성바오로병원김현우

Patient-reported Sexual Function After Nerve-sparing Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy

A Comparative Analysis of Primary and Secondary Gleason Pattern Predictive Ability for Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy

Prostate Cancer Dashboard

Impact of a Retrotrigonal Layer Backup Stitch on Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence

Hugh J. Lavery, M.D., Fatima Nabizada-Pace, M.P.H., John R. Carlucci, M.D., Jonathan S. Brajtbord, B.A., David B. Samadi, M.D.*

RADICAL CYSTECTOMY. Solutions for minimally invasive urologic surgery

Bill Landry BScPT, BScH, MCPA, CAFCI Family Physiotherapy Centre of London

Robotic radical prostatectomy Technique and results of nerve sparing approach EAU 2009 March 19 th 2009

DTI fiber tracking at 3T MR using b-1000 value in the depiction of periprostatic nerve before and after nervesparing prostatectomy

Transperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy After Prosthetic Mesh Herniorrhaphy

LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN THE ERA OF ROBOT-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGY

PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA AFTER PRESERVATION OF THE BLADDER NECK IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Thai Men with Prostate Cancer

Prostate MRI. Overview. Introduction 2/20/2015. Prostate cancer is most frequently diagnosed noncutaneous cancer in males (25%)

Localized at a focus, central point or locus. Localized finding distinct from neighboring tissues, not a threedimensional

OHTAC Recommendation

S Crouzet, O Rouvière, JY Chapelon, F Mege, X martin, A Gelet

Luis Ramos Harvard Medical School BIDMC Department of Radiology Class of 2011

Early Detection: Screening Guidelines

Post- prostatectomy Incontinence - PPI

Collaborative Stage Coding Prostate Cases

TECHNIQUE UPDATE RIU MedReviews, LLC

South Asian Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol.3, No.9 (2017) 17 22

Transcription:

John W. Davis Editor Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Beyond the Learning Curve 123

Apex: The Crossroads of Functional Recovery and Oncologic Control 10 Fatih Atug I nt rod u c ti on Prostate cancer is the most common nondermatologic cancer in men and radical prostatectomy is the standard treatment now [ 1 ]. In order to reduce the morbidity of open procedure, new techniques have been developed such as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and recently robotic surgery. Robotic surgery with 3-D view, optical magnification, and 7 moving instruments has developed very rapidly. And today, robotassisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the most popular radical prostatectomy technique with more than 100,000 cases/year in the USA [ 2 ]. The utilization of robotic technology to radical prostatectomy operations led surgeons to make more careful, precise, and accurate dissections to see important anatomic structures in order to achieve a negative surgical margin, full continence, and recovery of erectile function. Apex is the most different and unique part of the prostate, which is the crossroad of functional recovery and oncological control in radical prostatectomy operations. However, there are significant anatomic variations of prostate apex from one individual to another (Fig. 10.1 ). Every F. Atug (*) Professor of Urology, Istanbul Bilim University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey e-mail: fatihatug@hotmail.com robotic surgeon should know and realize these anatomic variations and their relationship to urethra, distal sphincter, and neurovascular bundles. An appropriate and careful apical dissection of prostate should include three important steps: (a) The last step of prostate removal: cutting the prostate apex at the most precise point to achieve a negative surgical margin. (b) Preserving the maximum length of urethra for protecting the urethral sphincter as much as possible. (c) If a nerve-sparing procedure was performed, to protect neurovascular bundles by gently dissecting out from apex and the cutting point of urethra. Anatomic Considerations All men created equal but not all prostates are. The shape of the prostate differs from one individual to another. The majority of these differences originate from the apical part of the prostate. At puberty, prostate starts to grow and incorporates urethral sphincter. Specifically at the level of prostatic apex, the fibers of the urethral sphincter are partly overlapped by the prostate and covered with it [ 3 5 ]. Anatomic and functional studies demonstrated that the length of the functional urethra changes between 1.5 and 2.4 cm and a significant part was located intraprostatically Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 J.W. Davis (ed.), Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32641-2_10 99

100 F. Atug Fig. 10.1 Different apical shapes of prostates overlapping the urethral sphincter Fig. 10.2 Different shapes of prostatic apex by MRI. ( a ) Apex overlapping the membranous urethra both anteriorly and posteriorly. ( b ) Apex overlapping membranous between the prostatic apex and the verumontanum [ 6 12 ]. The apex may overlap the urethral sphincter circumferentially, symmetrically bilaterally, asymmetrically unilaterally, anteriorly only, and posteriorly only, or can bluntly end above the sphincter (Fig. 10.1 ) [ 12, 13 ]. The shape of the prostate at the apex may vary substantially, directly influencing the length of the urethra after emerging from the apex [ 14 ]. urethra anteriorly. ( c ) Apex overlapping membranous urethra posteriorly. ( d ) Apex overlapping membranous urethra (Lee et al.) Lee et al. reported that circumferential overlap is observed in 38 % of all cases, anterior overlap in 25 %, posterior overlap in 22 %, and no overlap in 15 %. Which means that apical overlap or variations can be seen in nearly 85 % of patients (Fig. 10.2 ) [ 15 ]. Moreover, significant overlap makes the preservation of urethral sphincter difficult and should be considered during dissection and appropriate transection of the urethra at the apex (Fig. 10.3 ). When the prostatic parenchyma was covered by

10 Apex: The Crossroads of Functional Recovery and Oncologic Control 101 Fig. 10.3 ( a, b ) The functional urethra is covered by parenchymal apex tissue. ( c ) The prostatic apex is covered by urethral sphincter on the ventral and rectal sides the muscular urethra, there is greater risk of urethral shortening and urinary incontinence [ 15 ]. Identifying the exact border of the sphincter overlapped by the prostate intraoperatively is the main surgical difficulty for the surgeon. In addition, preserving the urethral sphincter during apical dissection of the prostate must be balanced with minimizing positive surgical margins. S u rgi c al Technique The apical dissection of prostate is the most difficult part of the radical prostatectomy operation due to several reasons: The prostate is located in the deep part of the narrow bony pelvis; moreover the apex of the prostate is located at the deepest and narrowest part of the pelvis. There is no real capsule at the level of prostatic apex. Prostatic overlap over the urethra exists in majority of patients. The ventral part of the apex is covered by the dorsal vascular complex. The lateral aspect of the apex is surrounded by neurovascular bundles. Surg i c a l Te c hnique Fig. 10.4 Prostate apex in a circumferential shape Before starting the apical dissection, the prostate should be free from the bladder neck and neurovascular bundles. Bleeding from neurovascular should be minimal to obtain the ideal visualization. Increasing pneumoperitoneum to 18 20 mmhg prior to transection of the dorsal venous complex may help to obtain a bloodless clear field. After division of DVC, the apex of the prostate and urethra should be inspected very carefully to see the anatomic variations. The apical prostate shape varies significantly from one patient to another; apical overlap or variations can be seen in nearly 85 % of patients [ 16 ]. Some different shapes of prostate and variations are given below: The prostate apex may be in a circumferential shape and end bluntly above the sphincter. There is no overlap of prostate tissue in such patients (Fig. 10.4 ). The apex may be asymmetrical unilaterally and protrude over the urethra because of a BPH nodule on one side. In such kind of patients surgeons should be very careful not to leave an apical prostate tissue behind (Fig. 10.5 ).

102 F. Atug Fig. 10.5 BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia) nodule on right side of the prostate. ( a ) Transection of the urethra at the level of BPH nodule. ( b ) Correct transection line of the urethra. (*) BPH nodule Fig. 10.6 ( a ) Prostate apex in a horn shape. Transection of the urethra at the level of the prostate horn. ( b ) Border of proximal urethra. Prostate specimen of the same patient after the RARP operation The apical tissue may be in a horn shape on one side or both sides and protrude over the urethra. If the transection is performed at or beyond the horn of the prostate, the residual length of urethra will be short and this may result in delayed return of continence in these patients (Fig. 10.6a, b ). It has been demonstrated by several anatomical studies that an important functional part of the urethral sphincter is located intraprostatically between the apex and verumontanum [ 3, 7, 8, 12, 15 ]. With the growth of the prostate at puberty, the prostate starts to occupy the sphincteric muscle with covering some part of the sphincter and integrating it within the prostatic tissue [ 17 ]. Consequently, depending on the individual apex shape, between 10 and 40 % of the functional urethra is covered by parenchymal apex tissue among different patients [ 10 14, 18 ]. Moreover, in some patients the prostatic parenchyma may be covered by the muscular urethral sphincter on the anterior side of prostate. Such anatomic variations will cause extra technical difficulty in preservation of distal sphincteric mechanism, Fig. 10.7.

10 Apex: The Crossroads of Functional Recovery and Oncologic Control 103 Fig. 10.7 Prostatic apex is covered by muscular urethral sphincter. ( a ) Edge of the prostatic apex. ( b ) Intraprostatic part of the urethra Conclusion Apical dissection of prostate during RARP is the most critical and important part of the radical prostatectomy operations. Dissection of apex will have an intense effect on three important parameters: surgical margin status (apical margin), continence, and sexual function (neurovascular bundles). As every surgeon would agree and know, understanding the complex anatomy of male pelvis and prostate is certainly vital for achieving these goals in RRP operations. Fig. 10.8 The prostate specimen. After removing the intraprostatic part of the urethra, the lateral lobes and veru are clearly seen The intraprostatically located structures of the sphincter should be appropriately and safely separated from the surrounding prostatic tissue in order to achieve maximum urethral length. After removing the intraprostatically located urethra from the prostate, the lateral lobes of the prostate and verumontanum should be seen clearly, Fig. 10.8. References 1. Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol. 2012;61:1079 92. 2. In: Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, editors. SEER Cancer statistics review. National Cancer Institute; 1975 2012. 3. Oelrich TM. The urethral sphincter muscle in the male. Am J Anat. 1980;158:229 46. 4. Koraitim MM. The male urethral sphincter complex revisited: an anatomical concept and its physiological correlate. J Urol. 2008;179:1683 9.

104 F. Atug 5. Light JK, Rapoll E, Wheeler TM. The striated urethral sphincter: muscle fibre types and distribution in the prostatic capsule. Br J Urol. 1997;79:539 42. 6. Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC, et al. The pathophysiology of postradical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study. J Urol. 2000;163:1767 70. 7. Hammerer P, Huland H. Urodynamic evaluation of changes in urinary control after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1997;157:233 6. 8. Myers RP, Cahill DR, Devine RM, King BF. Anatomy of radical prostatectomy as defined by magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 1998;159:2148 58. 9. Nguyen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A. Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing postprostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 2008;179:1907 11. 1 0. P a p a r e l P, Akin O, Sandhu JS, et al. Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol. 2009;55:629 39. 11. Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57:179 92. 12. Myers RP. Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28:473 90. 13. Myers RP. Male urethral sphincteric anatomy and radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1991;18:211 27. 14. Myers RP, Villers A. Anatomic considerations in radical prostatectomy. In: Kirby RS, Partin AW, Feneley M, Parsons JK, editors. Prostate cancer; principles and practice, vol. 1. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis; 2006. p. 701 13. 15. Lee SE, Byun SS, Lee HJ, et al. Impact of variations in prostatic apex shape on early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2006;68:137 41. 16. Lee H, Kim K, Hwang SI, Lee HJ, Byun SS, Lee SE, Hong SK. Impact of prostatic apical shape and protrusion on early recovery of continence after robot- assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2014;84(4):844 9. 17. Wallner C, Dabhoiwala NF, DeRuiter MC, Lamers WH. The anatomical components of urinary continence. Eur Urol. 2009;55:932 44. 18. Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Steuber T, Salomon G, Engel O, Michl U, Haese A, Graefen M, Huland H. Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2011;60(2):320 9.