Understanding the Regulation of Antigen Specific T Helper Cells by Cytokines and Costimulatory Molecules Expressed on distintct Antigen Prtesenting

Similar documents
The Adaptive Immune Responses

Defensive mechanisms include :

Lecture 9: T-cell Mediated Immunity

Adaptive immune responses: T cell-mediated immunity

LECTURE: 23 T-AND B-LYMPHOCYTES COOPERATIONS LEARNING OBJECTIVES: The student should be able to:

Examples of questions for Cellular Immunology/Cellular Biology and Immunology

Prof. Ibtesam Kamel Afifi Professor of Medical Microbiology & Immunology

The T cell receptor for MHC-associated peptide antigens

Cellular Immune response. Jianzhong Chen, Ph.D Institute of immunology, ZJU

Chapter 17B: Adaptive Immunity Part II

Adaptive Immune System

Physiology Unit 3. ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY The Specific Immune Response

TCR, MHC and coreceptors

CELL BIOLOGY - CLUTCH CH THE IMMUNE SYSTEM.

T-cell activation T cells migrate to secondary lymphoid tissues where they interact with antigen, antigen-presenting cells, and other lymphocytes:

T-cell activation T cells migrate to secondary lymphoid tissues where they interact with antigen, antigen-presenting cells, and other lymphocytes:

LYMPHOCYTES & IMMUNOGLOBULINS. Dr Mere Kende, Lecturer SMHS

11/25/2017. THE IMMUNE SYSTEM Chapter 43 IMMUNITY INNATE IMMUNITY EXAMPLE IN INSECTS BARRIER DEFENSES INNATE IMMUNITY OF VERTEBRATES

Immune response. This overview figure summarizes simply how our body responds to foreign molecules that enter to it.

Antigen Recognition by T cells

Principles of Adaptive Immunity

Immunology. T-Lymphocytes. 16. Oktober 2014, Ruhr-Universität Bochum Karin Peters,

ACTIVATION OF T LYMPHOCYTES AND CELL MEDIATED IMMUNITY

Attribution: University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Microbiology and Immunology

M.Sc. III Semester Biotechnology End Semester Examination, 2013 Model Answer LBTM: 302 Advanced Immunology

T Cell Activation. Patricia Fitzgerald-Bocarsly March 18, 2009

Adaptive Immunity: Humoral Immune Responses

NANO 243/CENG 207 Course Use Only

C. Incorrect! MHC class I molecules are not involved in the process of bridging in ADCC.

Lecture 4. T lymphocytes

ACTIVATION AND EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS OF CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY AND NK CELLS. Choompone Sakonwasun, MD (Hons), FRCPT

Adaptive Immune Response Day 2. The Adaptive Immune Response

Tumors arise from accumulated genetic mutations. Tumor Immunology (Cancer)

LESSON 2: THE ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY

T Cell Effector Mechanisms I: B cell Help & DTH

White Blood Cells (WBCs)

Cell Mediated Immunity (I) Dr. Aws Alshamsan Department of Pharmaceu5cs Office: AA87 Tel:

Properties & Overview of IRs Dr. Nasser M. Kaplan JUST, Jordan. 10-Jul-16 NM Kaplan 1

Adaptive Immunity: Specific Defenses of the Host

Effector mechanisms of cell-mediated immunity: Properties of effector, memory and regulatory T cells

Immune System AP SBI4UP

General Biology. A summary of innate and acquired immunity. 11. The Immune System. Repetition. The Lymphatic System. Course No: BNG2003 Credits: 3.

The Immune System. These are classified as the Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses. Innate Immunity

I. Critical Vocabulary

BMC Immunology. Open Access. Abstract

Introduction to Immunology Part 2 September 30, Dan Stetson

Immunopathology. 2-Patterned hemodynamic responses, cell surface associated and soluble mediator systems (e.g., complement and coagulation systems).

T cell maturation. T-cell Maturation. What allows T cell maturation?

Immune Regulation and Tolerance

Chapter 22: The Lymphatic System and Immunity

Antigen Presentation and T Lymphocyte Activation. Abul K. Abbas UCSF. FOCiS

T cell Receptor. Chapter 9. Comparison of TCR αβ T cells

Immunology 2011 Lecture 14 Cell Interactions in CMI II 7 October

Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) and T Cell Receptors

I. Lines of Defense Pathogen: Table 1: Types of Immune Mechanisms. Table 2: Innate Immunity: First Lines of Defense

Review Questions: Janeway s Immunobiology 8th Edition by Kenneth Murphy

chapter 17: specific/adaptable defenses of the host: the immune response

Clinical Basis of the Immune Response and the Complement Cascade

There are 2 major lines of defense: Non-specific (Innate Immunity) and. Specific. (Adaptive Immunity) Photo of macrophage cell

Chapter 10 (pages ): Differentiation and Functions of CD4+ Effector T Cells Prepared by Kristen Dazy, MD, Scripps Clinic Medical Group

Adaptive Immunity to Bacteria. T cell subsets

Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance. Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco

Supplemental Table I.

Immune response to infection

Topics in Parasitology BLY Vertebrate Immune System

The Adaptive Immune Response. B-cells

Adaptive Immunity. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations prepared by Mindy Miller-Kittrell, North Carolina State University C H A P T E R

The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC)

Adaptive Immunity. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations prepared by Mindy Miller-Kittrell, North Carolina State University C H A P T E R

T cell and Cell-mediated immunity

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Immunology for the Rheumatologist

PLAN. Réponses B thymodépendantes et thymoindépendantes. B cell development and classification. B cell activation. Thymodependent B(2) cell response

COURSE: Medical Microbiology, MBIM 650/720 - Fall TOPIC: Antigen Processing, MHC Restriction, & Role of Thymus Lecture 12

Histocompatibility antigens

Antigen processing and presentation. Monika Raulf

T Lymphocyte Activation and Costimulation. FOCiS. Lecture outline

Chapter 23 Immunity Exam Study Questions

Micro 204. Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTL) Lewis Lanier

Physiology Unit 3 THE SPECIFIC IMMUNE RESPONSE

Immunobiology 7. The Humoral Immune Response

Test Bank for Basic Immunology Functions and Disorders of the Immune System 4th Edition by Abbas

Adaptive (acquired) immunity. Professor Peter Delves University College London

Immunology Basics Relevant to Cancer Immunotherapy: T Cell Activation, Costimulation, and Effector T Cells

Chapters 20, 21. Lymphatic and Immune System. Overview. Specific Defenses 22/10/12. Part II. Specific Immunity BIOL242

Design and Development of Cell-Based Potency Assays for Biologics Targeting T-Cell Co-Stimulation and Co-inhibition Pathways

NTD Vaccine Design Toolkit and Training Workshop Providence, RI January 05, 2011 Cytokines Leslie P. Cousens, PhD EpiVax, Inc.

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION. for both infectious diseases and malignancies. Immunity is known as the innate

Generation of the Immune Response

Scott Abrams, Ph.D. Professor of Oncology, x4375 Kuby Immunology SEVENTH EDITION

The Immune System: Innate and Adaptive Body Defenses Outline PART 1: INNATE DEFENSES 21.1 Surface barriers act as the first line of defense to keep

Structure and Function of Antigen Recognition Molecules

Immunology MIMM-314 MID-TERM II EXAMINATION. 1 hour between 8:30 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. McIntyre Medical Rm 504 (Martin Amphitheatre)

Third line of Defense

They determine if there will be an immune response. Determine functions associated with immune response, but not specific to Ag.

An#body structure & func#on

T Cell Development II: Positive and Negative Selection

Adaptive Immunity. Jeffrey K. Actor, Ph.D. MSB 2.214,

Chapter 21: Innate and Adaptive Body Defenses

Andrea s Final Exam Review PCB 3233 Spring Practice Final Exam

Transcription:

Researcher : Vinod Singh (2003) SUMMARY ---.,.-:-.., Guide : Agrewala, J.N.(Dr.) Understanding the Regulation of Antigen Specific T Helper Cells by Cytokines and Costimulatory Molecules Expressed on distintct Antigen Prtesenting The ~ro~ession of T cells from a quiescent or resting state to a fully activated and prolifsrating cell is a crucial ~tv in defending against fore;= pathogens. T cells require --. two signals for optimum activation and effector function. One of these signals determines which CD~' cells will respo;d to a particular antigen: is delivered through the receptor for an antigen on the T cells (TCR), which is recognized in the form of peptide fragments bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class Ii molecules. The second signal, which is not delivered via the TCR and is not antigen specific, has been termed as a costimulatory signal because while essential it does not by itself induce any response in T cells. However, when a T cell has its receptor ligated and receives costimulatory signal, then only the T cell will proliferate and differentiate into an armed effector cell. T cells that bind antigen but do not receive costimulatory signals are thought to die or to become anergic, a state in which the cell cannot be activated even if it receives both the signals required to activate. Antigen,presenting cells viz. B cell, macrophage and dendritic cell express on their surface an array of costimulatory molecules like ICAM-1, HSA, CD40, B7-1, B7-2 and M150. The exact mechanism of sequence of signals delivered by different costimulatory molecules in stimulating T cells is largely unknown. The best defined co- stimulators till date are B7-1 and B7-2, both of which have been well documented in providing critical costimulatory signals for T cells activation by interacting with their specific receptor, CD28. Recently, we have identified a 150-kDa (M150) molecule on the macrophage membrane. MI50 is a potent costimulatory molecule. It preferably activates Thl cells as evidenced by predominant IFN-y secretion by anti-cd3 Abs stimulated antigen specific CD~' T cells. IL-12 or IL-1 can also regulate activation of Thl and Th2 cells respectively. Both Thl and Th2 cells can proliferate in response to IL.-2 and IL-4. IFN-y inhibits the proliferation of Th2 cells. In the present study, we wanted to evaluate the possible role of costimulatory molecules B7-1 and B7-2 in the proliferation and cytokine secretion by Thl and Th2 rested effectors. Further, we also wanted to monitor whether increasing the strength of first signal could by pass the need of costimulation. We also studied the role of cytokines in conjunction with B7-1 and B7-2 costimulatory signals in modulating the activation of i;"d rested effectors. Furthe re, we studied the ability of Thl and Th2 rested effectors activated with anti-cd3 Ab and costimulatory molecules B7-1 and B7-2 to provide help to B cells. Distinct role of B cells, splenic and peritoneal macrophages was also stugied in

the regulation of the proliferation and cytokines secretion by Thl and Th2 cells in the presence of dlfrcront. cytokines and anti-1l-12 and anti-ifn-y Abs in the case of Thl cells and anti-il-4 Ab in the ca2e of Th2 cells. Finally, the role of IL-2, IL-12 and antigen pulsed splenocytes in the sustenance of Thl memory was studied. The study was conducted by employing pgl-10, AE7, D10.10.2 (Thl), D10G4.1 (Th2) clones and EL-4 (Tho) cells. The interesting features observed during the study were that the strength of first signal and second signal could greatly influence the behaviors of the Thl and Th2 rested effectors. EL-4 cells produced more L 2 and IL-4 with strong than weak first signal. B7-1 transfectants increased the production of IL-2 with all the doses of anti-cd3 Ab. However, the release of IL-2 was augmented with the increase in the number of B7.1 transfectants. With the delivery of weak first signal, only high concentration of B7-1 transfectants were effective in IL14 secretion. Both B7-1 and B7-2 transfectants enhanced the secretion of IL-4 by EL-4 cells stimulated with strong first signal. B7-1 transfectants were more potent than B7-2 transfectants. PGL-10 Thl rested effectors stimulated with weak anti-cd3 Ab induced marginal proliferation and B7-1 costimulation further increased the proliferation with the highest number of transfectants. Strongest dose of both anti-cd3 Ab and B7-1 transfectants induced maximum proliferation of Thl rested effectors. As observed in the case of proliferation, significant IFN-y secretion was also observed with the high dose of B7-1 transfectants when Thl cells were stimulated with weak first signal. With the increase in the strength of first signal, the level of IFN-y secretion was also enhanced. The production was further intensified by the addition of B7-1 transfectants. However, the lowest dose of B7-1 transfectants boosted IFN-y release by Thl cells stimulated with the strongest dose of fust signal. But with the increase in the dose of B7-1 transfectants, not much amplification in the yield of IFN-y was noticed. Costimulation with B7-2 transfectants showed only minor effect on Thl cells. To substantiate our results, we also tested our observation on the pro 'feration and IFN-y secretion on AE7 Thl rested effectors. The cells were costimulate using B7-1 and B7-2 transfectants. Stimulation with the strongest k, first signal, ruled out e need of costimulation for Thl rested effectors. AE7 Thl cells howed inhibition in the roliferation when stimulated with the strongest dose of first signal. This dose was 50 times more than the highest dose used for tlie stimulation of \ - 153 -

pgl-10 Thl cells. As compared to proliferation, when AE7 Thl cells were stimulated with the strongest degree of first signal, there was no inhibition in the secretion of IFN-y. AE7 Thl cells stimulsted with moderate strength of first signal showed their requirement dose of B7 transfectants. At the weak dose of fust signal, IFN-y production by AE7 Thl cells was not detected even when the highest numbers of B7-1 transfectants were added into the cultures. However, Thl cells stimulated with strong first signal produced optimum level of IFN-y and addition of B7-1 transfectants did not significantly enhanced After evaluating the costimulatory activity of B7-1 and B7-2 molecules on Thl clones, we also utilized D10G4.1 Th2 rested effector to monitor the difference in their requirement for costimulation. Th2 cells stimulated with increased dose of fust signal showed enhanced proliferation. However, costimulation with B7-1 transfectants increased the proliferation at weak to moderate dose of first signal. There was no effect of B7-1 costimulation when Th2 cells were stimulated with strong first signal. Surprisingly, highest dose of B7-2 inhibited Th2 proliferation. Only highest dose of B7-1 transfectants induced IL-4 secretion by Th2 cells stimulated with strong first signal. B7-1 costimulation showed increased L 4 production when Th2 cells were stimulated with strong fust signal. B7-2 also helped in the production of IL-4 but was inhibitory at higher doses. Th2 cells produced more IL-5 when stimulated with higher dose of fust signal. Addition of B7-1 and B7-2 transfectants further increased the yield of IL-5. We also wanted to study the influence cytomes in modulating the costimulatory behavior of B7-1 and B7-2 molecules. We therefore, studied the role of cytokines in conjunction with B7-1 and B7-2 transfectants in the regulation of the proliferation and cytokines secretion by Thl and Th2 rested effectors. Addition of IL12 in the cultures containing Thl cells stimulated with anti-cd3 Ab and B7-1 transfectants, induced optimal proliferation. Further, addition of IG2 alone or in combination with L-4 marginally increased the proliferation. Addition of IL-2 or IL-4 in the cultures comprising ration. Addition of cytokines and B7-2 transfectants failed to induce any effect. ion of IL-2 and IL-12 in Thl cells stimulated with anti-cd3 Ab alone or i~ context - 154 -

with B7 transfectants amplified the secretion of IFN-y. IL-12 induced optimal seer-t', Ion of IFN-y and addition of IL-2 ad IL-4 could not further induce any change. We also.~~~ evaluated the of qro- (IL4) and anti- (IFN-y) Th2 cytokines on the proliferation of anti-cd3 Ab stimulated D10G4.1 Th2 rested effectors costimulated with B7-1 and B7-2 transfectmts. Addition of IL-2 or IL-4 or both could significantly increase the proliferation of Th2 cells costimulated with B7-1 transfectants. No noticeable change was noted when Th2 cells were costimulated with B7-2 transfectants. Addition of IFN-y inhibited the proliferation of Th2 cells costimulated with B7-1 transfectants. It also neutralized the stimulato~y effect of IL-2 or IL-4 on Th2 cells stimulated with anti-cd3 Ab alone or in conjunction with B7-1 transfectants. In contrast to proliferation, addition of IFN-T moreover, assisted in the secretion of L 4 by Th2 cells costimulated with B7 transfectants. IL-2 also supported the production of IL-4 by Th2 cells costimulated with B7 transfectants. B7-2 transfectants were more potent in assisting IL-4 production than B7-1 transfectants in presence of IL-2 and IFN-y. But the addition of IL-2 or IL-4 sustained the production of IL-5 by Th2 cells costimulated with B7-1 but not B7-2 transfectants. Among the cytokines used, IL-2 was more potent than IL-4. The production of L 5 by Th2 cells mediated by IL-2 or IL-4 was inhibited by IFN-y. The IFN-y mediated inhibition of IL5 was more potent when Th2 cells were costimulated with B7-2 transfectants. Addition of IL1 in Th2 cells cultures stimulated with anti-cd3 Ab induced optimal proliferation of Th2 cells and addition of B7-1 transfectants further failed to induce any effect. B7-1 transfectants only induced proliferation when they were supplemented with L 4. B7-2 transfectants could not show any effect. Addition of 5 1 assisted in the secretion of IL-4 by Th2 cells costimulated by B7 transfectants. IL-1 was more potent in the production of IL-4 and IL-5 by Th2 cells stimulated with B7-1 transfectants than B7-2 transfectants. However, addition of IL-4 in the culture decreased Thl cells were also costimulated with different antigen presenting cells viz. B cell, splenic and peritoneal macrophages. Peritoneal macrophages induced the proliferation of Thl cells at low cell number but inhibited when used at a higher density. Antigen pulsed splenic macrophages induced more proliferation of Thl cells, followed by B cells.,

Peritoneal macrophages induced enhad m-y secretion than splenic macrophages and B cells. B cells were least stimulatoly for both proliferation and IFN-11 secretion. We also evakuated the effect of the mitomycin C treatment and y-irradiation on the costimulatory function of peritoneal macrophages. Gamma-irradiated peritoneal macrophages failed to support the proliferation of Thl cells. However, mitomycin C treated macrophages assisted the proliferation at lower dose of cells. Antigen pulsed or un-pulsed rnitomycin C treated macrophages produced less nitric oxide than y-irradiated macrophages cultured with Thl cells. We further evaluated the role of costimulatory molecules expressed on the surface of peritoneal macrophages in the proliferation and cytokines secretion by Thl and Th2 rested effectors. Incorporation of anti-m150, B7-1, 37-2, CD40, ICAM-1 and F4180 Abs inhibited the proliferation of Thl cells. However, Abs showed no effect on the IFN-y secretion by Thl cells. Only anti-icam-1 Ab could inhibit the proliferation of D10G4.1 Th2 cells. There was inhibition in the IL-4 and IL-5 production by Th2 cells when the cultures were incubated with anti-m150, B7-1, B7-2, CD40, ICAM-I and F4180 Abs. We also observed that costimulatoly molecules expressed on the surface of 5774, P388D1 and A20 cells helped in the IL2 and L-4 secretion by EL4 cells stimulated with anti-cd3 Ab. EL-4 cells were stimulated with anti-cd3 Ab in the presence of J774 cells as a source of costimulation. Anti-ICAM-1, B7-1, B7-2 and MI50 Abs considerably inhibited the secretion of IL-2 and IL-4. When we used P388D1 as a source of costimulation, we observed decline in the secretion of L-2 and L-4 by EL4 cells when only anti-icam-1 ~b was added into the cultures. When we used A20 as a source of costimulation, we observed that only anti-b7-1 Ab could inhibit the secretion of L-2 and IL-4. This indicates that even cancer cells can efficiently interact and costimulate each other. Further, different APC not only behaved differently as an antigen presenting cell but also utilize distinct costimulatory molecules to stimulate T cell response. We also evaluated the role of various antigen presenting cells viz. B cells and splenic macrophages in the presence of anti-il-12 Ab and different Thl and Th2 type cytokines in the proliferation and EN-*/ secretion by Thl cells. IL-4 or IL-12 substantially increased the proliferation of Thl cells stimulated by antigen-pulsed B cell. The response induced, by IL-4 or IL-12 was better than IL-2 or IFN-y. In the absence of B cells, IL-2 and IL-12

Proliferation of Thl cells induced by either - IL-2 or IL-4 could not be neutralized by anti- IL-12 Ab. We observed maximum secretion of IFN-y in the cultures stimulated with IL-. 12, IL-4 and to lesser extent by IL-2. Anti-IL-12 Ab significantly inhibited the release of IFN-y. We could not detect any blocking in the secretion of IFN-y in the cultures where IL-2 and IL-4 were added along with anti-il-12 Ab. The presence of IL-2 could only show marginal increase in the proliferation of pgl-i0 Thl clones. Surprisingly, when we added IL-2 or IL-4 into the cultures containing anti-il-12 Ab, there was augmentation in the proliferation. In contrast, addition of anti-il-12 Ab into the cultures along with antigen-pulsed splenic macrophages decreased the proliferation of Thl clones. In contrast to B cells, no enhancement in the secretion of IFN-y was observed when IL-2, IL-4 and IL-12 were added into antigen-pulsed splenic macrophages and pgl-10 Thl clone. However, there was decrease in the secretion of IFN-y in the cultures where splenic macrophages were used to stimulate Thl cells in the presence of anti-il-12 Ab. We also evaluated the role of various antigen presenting cells viz. B cells, splenic and peritoneal macrophages in the presence of anti-ifn-y Ab and different Thl and Th2 type cytokines in the proliferation and IFN-y secretion by Thl cells. There was not much change in the proliferation of pgl-10 Thl clones by incorporating anti-ifn-y Ab into the cultures containing antigen-pulsed B cells. There was however, marginal increase in the proliferation when IFN-y was added into the cultures in the absence of anti-ifn-y Ab. There was significant inhibition in the proliferation where anti-ifn-y Ab was added in the presence of IL-4. Addition of either IL-2 or IL-4 or IL-12 or IFN-y could not alter the proliferation of Thl rested effectors stimulated with antigen pulsed splenic macrophages. There was no change in the proliferation of Thl cells on addition of anti-ifn-y Ab into the cultures where antigen-pulsed splenic macrophages were used in the presence of either IL-2 or IL-4 or IG12. There was marginal decrease in the proliferation when either IFN-y Ab was added. When Thl cells were stimulated with IL-2, IL-4 or IL-12, there was augmentation in the proliferation. Addition of either IL-2 or IG12 further augmented the production of IFN-y by Thl cells stimulated with antigen pulsed peritoneal macrophages. In contrast, IL-4 inhibited the release of IFN-y. When peritoneal macrophages ;ere added

into Thl cells cultures stimulated with IL-2 or IL-4 or IL-12, there was significant enhancement in the production of IFN-y. We also noticed that low dose of IL-10 was stimulatory and supported the proliferation of Thl rested effectors stimulated by antigen We evaluated the role of different antigen presenting cells viz. B cells, splenic and peritoneal macrophages in the proliferation and cytokines secretion by D10G4.1 Th2 cell in the presence of antigen, anti-il-4 Ab and ThllTh2 type of cytokines. Addition of IL-2, IL-4 and IL-I into the cultures augmented the proliferation of Th2 cells stimulated with antigen pulsed B cells. However, these cytokines failed to alter the proliferation of Th2 cells incubated with allogenic B cells. IL-5 and IFN-y also could not show any effect on the proliferation. Addition of either IL-2 or L 1 augmented the proliferation of Th2 cells in the presence of anti-il-4 Ab. The extent of proliferation was lesser as compared to the cultures where no anti-il-4 Ab was added. Similar observations were also noticed with Th2 cells stimulated with allogenic B cells. Addition of IL-2, IL-5 and IL-l could not magnify the secretion of IL-4 by Th2 cells stimulated with antigen pulsed B cells. Interestingly, IFN-y significantly increased the release of IL-4. Addition of IFN-y and IL- 1 could also boost the secretion of E-4 by Th2 cells stimulated by allogeneic B cells. Addition of IL-1, IL-2, IL-4 and IFN-y intensified the secretion of IL-5 by Th2 cells,stimulated with antigen-pulsed or allogeneic B cells. Maximum enhancement in the secretion of L 5 was demonstrated by the addition of IG2. In the presence of anti-il-4 Ab, IL-2 and IL-1 augmented the production.of IL-5 by Th2 cells stimulated with antigen-pulsed or allogeneic B cells. This effect was more prominent with IL-2. IFN-11 could not influence the production of IL-5 in the presence of anti-il-4 Ab. However, IFN-y induced the production of IL-5 by Th2 cells stimulated by allogeneic B cells in the presence of anti-l4 Ab. Th2 clone when stimulated with allogeneic B cell produced more of L 4 and IL-5 as compared to the cultures where antigen-pulsed B cell was used as a source of APC. IL2, IL-4 and IL-1 also aided the proliferation of Th2 cells stimulated by antigen-pulsed splenic macrophages. However, only IL-1 induced marginal increase in the proliferation of Th2 rested effectors stimulated by allogeneic splenic macrophages. IFN-y inhibited the growth of Th2 rested clone stimulated by antigen \ pulsed or allogeneic splenic macrophages. IL-2 and IL-I also enhanced the proliferation

of Th2 cells even.iq. the presence of anti-~l-4 ~ b However,. the extent of proliferation ~~~ was less as compared to the cultures dc~riv" of anti-il-4 Ah. Th2 cells showed better proliferation with allogeneic splenic macrophage than antigen-pulsed splenic macrophages. Addition of IL-2, IL-5, IL-1 and IFN-y into the cultures further cohpounded the production of IL-4 by Th2 cells stimulated with antigen pulsed splenic or allogeneic splenic macrophages. Addition of IL-2, IL-4 and IL-1 augmented the secretion of IL-5 by Th2 cells stimulated by antigen-pulsed splenic macrophages. Similar observations were noted with allogeneic splenic macrophages. IL-2 was most effective in enhancing the production of IL-5. IL-2, IL-4 and IL-I augmented the production of IL-5 by Th2 cells stimulated with antigen un-pulsed splenic macrophages. Inthe presence of anti-il-4 Ab; L2, IL-1 and IFN-y enhanced the production of IL-5 by Th2 cells stimulated by antigen pulsed splenic and allogeneic splenic macrophages. As compared to antigen-pulsed peritoneal macrophages, allogeneic peritoneal macrophages induced better proliferation of D10G4.1 Th2 clone. IFN-y inhibited the proliferation of Th2 clone stimulated with antigen pulsed or allogeneic peritoneal macrophages. Addition of IL-I and IL-2 in the cultures containing anti-il-4 Ab augmented the proliferation of Th2 rested effectors. The extent of proliferation was significantly less in the cultures where anti-il-4 Ab was added. Addition of IL-2, IL-5, L l and IFN-y augmented the production of IL-4 by Th2 cells stimulated with antigen pulsed peritoneal macrophages. However, EN-?/ and IL-1 considerably supported the production of IL-4 when Th2 clone was stimulated with allogeneic peritoneal macrophages. Addition of IL-2, IL-4 and IL-1 boosted IL-5 secretion by Th2 clone stimulated with antigen-pulsed peritoneal macrophages. L 2 substantially upregulated the production of IL-5 by Th2 cells stimulated with allogeneic B cells. In the presence of anti-il-4 Ab, IL-2, IL-I and IFN-.( increased the IL-5 production by Th2 cells stimulated with antigen pulsed and allogeneic peritoneal macrophages. Since D10G4.1 Th2 clone was also allogeneic to the IA~ haplotrpe bearing APC, we therefore further wanted to substantiate our results using allogeneic APCs. Allogeneic B cell increased the proliferation to greatest extent as compared to splenic or peritoneal macrophages. High number of peritoneal macrophages induced inhibition in the proliferation of Th2 clone. B cells induced maximum IL-4 secretion, followed by peritoneal macrophages and splenic macrophages. Unlike IL4, peritoneal macrophages induced maximum IL-5 secretion, followed by B cells and splenic macrophages. x - 159 -

It is very crucial to explore the factors responslbla for sustenance of memory cells. We therefore also studied the role of It-2, IL-12 and APC in regulating the sustenance of memory cells. IL-12 showed major role in supporting the sustenance of memory response for short auration. IL-2 synergistically acted with IL-12 but also showed independent impact in the continuance of memory Thl cells. However, incorporation of antigenpulsed APC inhibited the memory response mediated by IL-12. Interestingly, by day 56, IL-12 in combination with IL-2 successfully maintained the memory Thl cells. Finally, we studied the ability of Thl and Th2 cells costimulated with either B7-1 or B7-2 to provide help B cells. Anti-CD3 Ab stimulated Thl cells costimulated with either CHO- B7-1 or CHO-B7-2 induced nearly similar level of B cells proliferation. Costimulation of Thl cells with either B7-1 or B7-2 transfectants, could gain only marginal competence to help B cells in the IgM secretion. Similar type of results were observed when Th2 cells were costimulated with B7 transfectants in providing help to B cells. When anti-cd3 Ab stimulated Thl rested effectors costimulated with B7-1 or B7-2 transfectants were utilized to deliver help to B cells, there was inhibition in the production of IgG1, IgG2a, IgG3 Abs. In contrast, when Th2 rested clones were costimulated with B7-1 and B7-2 there was marginal amplification in the yield of IgGl, IgG2a, IgG3 Abs. Enhancement in the production of IgA was observed when B cell help was provided by Thl clone that was costimulated with B7-1. Similar case was observed with B7-1 costimulated Th2 clones but no change was noticed when Th2 clone was costimulated with B7-2 molecules. However, as compared to the help extended to B cells, Th2 clone's performance was better than Thl clone; both in the proliferation and antibodies secretion. It may be inferred from these results that costimulation by B7-1 and B7-2 could influence the ability of Thl and Th2 cells to help B cell.