Paul Williams USDA-ARS, Mississippi State, MS Evaluation of GEM Germplasm for Resistance to Aflatoxin Accumulation 2007 Results

Similar documents
Aflatoxin Accumulation in a Maize Diallel Cross

Evaluation of African-Bred Maize Germplasm Lines for Resistance to Aflatoxin Accumulation

Burt Bluhm Department of Plant Pathology University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

Multidisciplinary Approaches to Reduce the Impact of Corn Aflatoxin on Texas

PREHARVEST AFLATOXIN IN MAIZE GENOTYPES UNDER INOCULATION WITH ASPERGILLUS FLAVUS

mycotoxin-contaminated contaminated food or feed

Section 5: Wheat Scab Research

Section 4: Milling and Baking Quality

Many species in the genus Fusarium have the capacity to

Section 2: Barley Scab Research

Pathology and Mycotoxins

PROJECT PROPOSAL SUGARBEET RESEARCH AND EDUCATION BOARD OF MINNESOTA AND NORTH DAKOTA FY

Aflatoxin: What is it, and why worry? Doug Jardine Professor Kansas State University

M. S. ZUBER A. J. KEASTER N. G. WEIR C. F. STARK P. J. LOESCH, JR. January,1970

GENOTYPIC AND PHENOTYPIC CHARACTERIZATION OF RESPONSE TO AFLATOXIN AND SECONDARY TRAITS IN MAIZE. A Dissertation MELANIE LOVE EDWARDS

Project Title: Development of GEM line starch to improve nutritional value and biofuel production

Review Article Aflatoxin Resistance in Maize: What Have We Learned Lately?

Alternative Methods for the Control of Mycotoxins

2011 GEM Report: Truman State University, Annual GEM Cooperator meeting, ASTA, Dec. 7, Chicago, IL

Significant occurrence of aflatoxin M1 and M2 in milk, 2012

2014 Annual Report of the GEM Project, Ames, IA and Raleigh, NC

P.J. Cotty, Page NO.1 of 8.

MYCOTOXINS COMMONLY FOUND IN IOWA

Deoxynivalenol: Known Facts and Research Questions. DON (deoxynivalenol) is a damaging toxin produced by the fungus Fusarium

Possible climate change impact on occurrence of Aspergillus flavus on spelt wheat in Serbia

Research Area 2 Plant based Antimicrobial compounds against Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus in Peanuts

In-vitro determination of kernel resistance to Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin accumulation in groundnut

4. PLANT PATHOLOGY SECTION

Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development. Screening of Mycotoxin Produced by Fusarium Verticillioides and F. Proliferatum in Culture Media

Tina L. Brandt, Nora Olsen, Jeff Stark, Rich Novy, and Sanjay Gupta. Storage Management of. Classic Russet. Potatoes

Project title: Fusarium wilt of lettuce: management through detection, avoidance and disease resistance

Journal of Plant Pathology (2009), 91 (2), Edizioni ETS Pisa, AND AFLATOXIN B 1

EAR AND KERNEL ROTS. When to look for: Mid-August to October (and during storage)

INFLUENCE OF SOME NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC TOXINS CHARACTERISTIC FOR FUSARIUM FUNGUS ON IZOPEROXIDASES IN SOME WHEAT GENOTYPES

Aflatoxin Effect On Health. Dr Subroto Mukherjee USAID/East Africa

Genetics of Resistance to Preharvest Aflatoxin Accumulation in Maize Containing the Lfy Gene.

Biotechnological strategies for immunity to aflatoxin contamination in groundnut. Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur

Table 1 Disease Ratings* May 22 May 30 Tst Treatment and rate/a Inc Sev Fld Sev Inc Sev Fld Sev Bu/A** LSD P=

Effect of Plant Height on Fusarium Head Blight in Spring Wheat

Fusarium thapsinum is the dominant species associated with sorghum stalk rot in Queensland and northern New South Wales

Sorghum Grain Mold: Variability in Fungal Complex

DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH-AMYLOSE CORN VARIETIES FOR NORTHEAST MISSOURI: A POSSIBLE SPECIALTY CROP OPPORTUNITY FOR LOCAL PRODUCERS.

Fungal Parasites and Pathogens

Fusaria and Fusarium mycotoxins in leaves and ears of maize plants 2. A time course study made in the Waikato region, New Zealand, in 1997

Hidden toxins : Mycotoxins masked by glucosylation. Mark Busman USDA-ARS Peoria, Illinois

DETERMINATION OF TOXIGENIC FUNGI AND THEIR ASSOCIATED MYCOTOXINS IN MAIZE FROM MERU COUNTY JOHN NDERITU GATHOGO SUPERVISOR: PROF: R.

FOODBORNE DISEASES. Why learning foodborne diseases is very important? What do you know about foodborne diseases? What do you want to know more?

from Milk According to AOAC Method Using the Gilson GX-271 ASPEC System

Mycotoxins in high moisture grain silages and ensiled grain by-products

Field Guide to Maize Diseases in Hawaii Seed Corn Nurseries. By David Case

CONDUCTING AN EFFECTIVE ANIMAL FEED HAZARD EVALUATION

Effect of Environmental Factors on the Growth of Aspergillus Species Associated with Stored Millet Grains in Sokoto.

MYCOTOXINS IN PLANT DISEASE

Fungi Isolated from Flue-cured Tobacco at Time of Sale and After Storage1

Predicting the Unpredictable: Disease Factors in Small Grain Production. Juliet M. Marshall. Idaho Falls and Aberdeen R&E Centers

Hamed K. Abbas, 1 Nacer Bellaloui, 2 Robert M. Zablotowicz, 3 H. Arnold Bruns, 3 and Anne M. Gillen Introduction

PLANT PATHOLOGY & NEMATOLOGY

STUDIES ON FUNGAL POPULATION OF CUMIN (NIGELLA SATIVA L.) FROM DIFFERENT PARTS OF MARATHWADA.

Can Brachypodium distachyon provide insight into FHB? Paul Nicholson Disease and Stress Biology Department John Innes Centre

Mycotoxin Prevention in Cereal Crops by Enhanced Host Plant Resistance an update October2008

GRDC Grains Research Update

Project Title: Value-added Utilization of GEM Normal and High-amylose Line Starch

Dr. Patrick Conner University of Georgia Tifton Campus

REPORT TO THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION December 2010 Project Title: Management of Fusarium

Aflatoxin in Milk Risk Assessment and Remediation

North Central Soybean Research Program. Seedling Diseases: Biology, Management and Education

Genetic Enhancement of Groundnut for Resistance to Aflatoxin Contamination

Recent Feed Contaminant Incidents: Aflatoxin in Corn and Dioxins in Hydrogenated Palm Oil

THE RELATIONSHIP OF HETEROSIS AND GENETIC DIVERGENCE IN MAIZE1

DIAGNOSTIC VOMITOXIN (DON) SERVICES IN

Processing Tomato Breeding and Genetics Research 2005.

Plant Pathogen Suppression the Synergistic Effect between Biofertilizer and Irradiated Oligochitosan of Tomato

Overview of Mycotoxins in India with special reference to Aflatoxins. F Waliyar

MYCOTOXINS IN AQUACULTURE

RAPID SCREENING TECHNIQUE FOR ALTERNARIA BLIGHT RESISTANCE IN INDIAN MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L.) USING COTYLEDONARY LEAF METHOD

Pasting Cell: An Alternative Sample Cell for Detection of Aspergillus flavus Infected Milled Rice by NIR Spectroscopy

SCREENING FOR FUNGAL AND BACTERIAL METABOLIES USING QTRAP TECHNOLOGY

Lecture 9: Hybrid Vigor (Heterosis) Michael Gore lecture notes Tucson Winter Institute version 18 Jan 2013

Management of Fusarium and other Soil Borne Diseases in Tomatoes and Vegetables

TOXIC CONDITIONS OF ANIMALS

Nanofeed Detector A Simple Gadget that Protects the Health of Farm Animals and it s Industry from Contaminated Feeds. Dr. Gil Nonato C.

Mycotoxins, MRL s & food chain contaminations

Quality Grain Management Effects on the Feed Industry. Ben Weaver Regional Account Manager

Does Soybean Genetics Affect Soybean Aphid/Virus Management?

Fatty Acid Data in the USDA National Nutrient Databank: Data handling and currency issues

Aflatoxin in Food: What Role for Biotechnology?

Mycotoxins and Swine Performance

Slaven Zjalić, Department of ecology, agronomy and aquaculture, University of Zadar, Croatia

Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Select for Resistance to FHB Various Applications

Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry ISSN Available online at

Microbiology and Safety of Bran from Latvia

Project Title: Development of a method for conducting tests for resistance to tombusviruses and lettuce dieback in the greenhouse.

New tricks of an old enemy: Fusarium graminearum can also produce a type A trichothecene

Pathogenicity of Corynespora cassiicola in Upland Cotton

Entry Individuals/Genotypes Breeding History or Origin. Applaud L. perenne 6 Applaud perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) is a turf-type perennial

MATERIALS AND METHODS 68

Fusarium sp. associated with stem diseases on sunflowers

Deployment of Novel Sources of Sclerotinia Stalk Rot Resistance in Sunflower

Abstract. Introduction

ANALYTICAL METHODS IN DETERMINING AFLATOXIN B1 IN FOOD

Transcription:

Paul Williams USDA-ARS, Mississippi State, MS Evaluation of GEM Germplasm for Resistance to Aflatoxin Accumulation 2007 Results Contamination of corn grain with aflatoxin, a toxin produced by the fungus Aspergillus flavus, is a major impediment to profitable corn production in the southern United States. ARS breeding programs at Tifton, Georgia and Mississippi State have been engaged in a long-term effort to identify sources of resistance and to develop germplasm with resistance to aflatoxin accumulation. In recent years, the GEM project has been a primary source of new germplasm for resistance screening. Results of some of the 2007 evaluations follow. 1. Evaluation of inbreds for resistance to aflatoxin accumulation at Mississippi State in 2007 (Table 1). Entries 1-11 were provided by Mike Blanco. They exhibited excellent resistance to Fusarium ear rot in an evaluation conducted in California. Entries 12-22 had been selected for resistance to aflatoxin accumulation by Matt Krakowsky at Tifton, Georgia. Entries 23-33 were selected for resistance to aflatoxin accumulation by Michael Clements, Gary Windham, and Paul Williams at Mississippi State. Entries 34-37 are resistant checks and 38-40, susceptible checks. These lines were grown in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Ears were inoculated with an A. flavus spore suspension 7 days after midsilk using the side needle technique. Aflatoxin concentration in the grain was determined by the Vicam Afla Test. Data were transformed [ln (y+1)] for statistical analysis. 2. Evaluation of top crosses for aflatoxin accumulation at Mississippi State in 2007 (Table 2). Top crosses of the inbreds exhibiting Fusarium ear rot resistance in California were obtained from Mike Blanco (entries 1-11). They were evaluated along with crosses of lines selected for resistance to aflatoxin contamination at Mississippi State; some of the lines were derived from GEM germplasm. The crosses were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Ears were inoculated with an A. flavus spore suspension 7 days after midsilk using the side needle technique. Aflatoxin concentration was determined by the Vicam Afla Test procedure. Data were transformed [ln (y+1)] before statistical analysis. 3. Multi-location evaluation of top crosses for resistance to aflatoxin accumulation (Table 3). Lines selected from GEM germplasm for resistance to aflatoxin accumulation were evaluated in top crosses at Raleigh, NC; Tifton, GA; and Mississippi State, MS, in 2007. The top crosses were grown in a randomized complete block design with four replications at each location. At Raleigh and Mississippi State, developing ears were inoculated with A. flavus using the side needle technique. At Tifton, ears were inoculated with a knife dipped in an A. flavus spore suspension. Aflatoxin concentration in the grain was determined by using the Vicam Afla Test. Data were transformed [ln (y +1)] for statistical analysis. The entry location interaction was highly significant.

Table 1. Evaluation of lines for aflatoxin accumulation at Mississippi State in 2007. Aflatoxin Entry Pedigree ln (y+1) a ng/g b 1 c (1881-002/98_DKXL370AN11F2S3_7521-05)-B-B 5.54 255 2 (1883-002/98_DKXL370AN11F2S3_7521-05)-B-B 5.78 324 3 (1883-001/98_DKXL370AN11F2S3_7521-05)-B-B 4.43 83 4 (1886-003/98_DKXL370AN11F2S3_7521-05)-B 5.46 232 5 (1895-001/98_DKXL370AN11F2S3_7521-29)-B-B 7.18 1317 6 (1507-001/98_DK212TN11F2S3_7431-03)-B-B 6.70 808 7 BR51721:N2012-397-001-B-B 7.81 2461 8 AR16026:S17-10-1-B-B 5.46 234 9 PE001n16F2S2-239-B-B-B 6.56 703 10 AR16026:S17-237-002-B-B-B-B-B 6.90 994 11 DKXL370:N11a20-322-001-B-B-Sib-B 5.56 258 12 d AR16026:S17-10-1-B-B-B-1 7.43 1683 13 AR16026:S17-10-1-B-B-B-3 7.56 1918 14 (2086-01_DK212T_S11_F2S4_9154-Blk20/00-sib)-1 5.80 330 15 (2086-01_DK212T_S11_F2S4_9154-Blk20/00-sib)-2 5.93 377 16 (2250-02_XL370A_S11_F2S4_3363-Blk03/00-sib)-1 3.58 35 17 (2258-03_XL380_S11_F2S4_71/97_Bulk/98-sib)-1 7.72 2254 18 (2258-03_XL380_S11_F2S4_71/97_Bulk/98-sib)-2 7.20 1337 19 (2258-03_XL380_S11_F2S4_71/97_Bulk/98-sib)-3 7.91 2715 20 CUBA117:S15-101-1-B-B-B-1-1 5.81 332 21 CUBA117:S15-101-1-B-B-B-2-1 4.23 68 22 CUBA117:S15-101-1-B-B-B-5-1 4.92 136 23 e (2250-01_XL370A_S11_F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-4-4-1-B 4.54 93 24 (2250-01_XL370A_S11_F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-4-9-3-B 5.26 191 25 (2250-01_XL370A_S11_F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-4-11-1-B 6.18 482 26 (2250-01_XL370A_S11_F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-4-11-2-B 6.55 702 27 (2250-01_XL370A_S11_F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-5-1-2-B 4.60 98 28 (2250-01_XL370A_S11_F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-5-1-3-B 4.22 67 29 (2250-01_XL370A_S11_F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-5-4-2-B 4.22 67 30 (2250-01_XL370A_S11_F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-4-1-B 6.38 589 31 (2250-01_XL370A_S11_F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-6-1-B 6.47 642 32 (2250-01_XL370A_S11_F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-7-2-B 3.42 29 33 (2250-01_XL370A_S11_F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-9-1-B 5.41 223 34 f Mp 313E (Resistant) 4.53 91 35 Mp 420 (Resistant) 6.54 690 36 Mp 717 (Resistant) 5.38 215 37 NC 300 (Resistant) 5.25 189 38 Va 35 (Susceptible) 7.84 2551 39 GA 209 (Susceptible) 9.17 9652 40 SC 212M (Susceptible) 8.88 7206 LSD (0.05) 1.17 Mean 5.95 CV 13.36 a Data were transformed [ln (y+1)] before statistical analysis.

b Geometric means were calculated by converting transformed means to the original scale. c Entries 1-11 were previously selected for resistance to Fusarium ear rot. d Entries 12-22 were selected for resistance to aflatoxin accumulation at Tifton, GA. e Entries 13-33 were selected for resistance to aflatoxin accumulation at Mississippi State, MS. f Check inbreds.

Table 2. Evaluation of top crosses for aflatoxin accumulation at Mississippi State in 2007. Aflatoxin Entry Pedigree ln (y+1) a ng/g b 1 c 1881-002/98 DKXL 370AN11F2S3xT1 5.26 192 2 1883-002/98 DKXL 370AN11F2S3xT1 5.73 306 3 1883-001/98 DKXL 370AN11F2S3xT8 4.97 143 4 1886-003/98 DKXL 370AN11F2S3xT8 4.61 100 5 1895-001/98 DKXL 370AN11F2S3xT8 6.31 548 6 1507-001/98 DK212TN11F2S3xT8 6.82 915 7 BR51721:N2012-397-001 x HC33 6.39 593 8 AR16026:S17-10-1-B x LH283 5.13 169 9 PE001n16F2S2-239 x LH200 5.61 273 10 AR16026:S17-237-002-B-B-B-B x DKXL370:N11a20-322- 5.29 197 001-B-B-B-B 11 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-5] x 6.05 422 LH210 12 d [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-4-11-1-1] 5.56 258 x Va35 13 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-1-1-1] 4.56 94 x Va35 14 Mp 04:96 x LH210 5.36 213 15 Mp 04:97 x LH210 3.45 31 16 Mp 04:97 x Va35 3.97 52 17 Mp 04:97 x NC 388 3.72 40 18 Mp 04:97 x Mo18W 4.63 102 19 B110 x Mp 04:110 4.65 103 20 B110 x Mp 04:96 5.15 172 21 B110 x Mp 04:97 4.20 65 22 (CUBA:S15)F7-1a-1-1-1-1 x MP 04:110 4.94 139 23 (CUBA:S15)F7-1a-1-1-1-1 x MP 04:96 4.76 116 24 (CUBA:S15)F7-1a-1-1-1-1 x MP 04:97 4.40 80 25 Mp 04:104 x B110 5.60 270 26 S2B73 x Mp 04:110 5.07 158 27 S2B73 x Mp 04:96 5.48 238 28 S2B73 x Mp 04:97 5.92 373 29 Mp 313E x Mo18W (Resistant ck) 3.72 40 30 Mp 313E x Mp717 (Resistant ck) 2.05 7 31 T173 x LH219 (Susceptible ck) 6.09 442 32 T173 x Va35 (Susceptible ck) 7.04 1141 33 GA209 x SC212m (Susceptible ck) 6.45 631 34 Dk679 (commercial ck) 7.66 2122 35 3310 (commercial ck) 7.81 2464 LSD (0.05) 1.14 Mean 5.40 CV 15.11 a Data were transformed [ln (y+1)] before statistical analysis.

b Geometric means were calculated by converting transformed means to the original scale. c Entries 1-11 were top crosses previously screened for Fusarium ear rot in California. d Entries 12-28 are top crosses and other crosses among lines selected for resistance to aflatoxin accumulation at Mississippi State. e Entries 29-35 are hybrid checks..

Table 3. Aflatoxin accumulation in testcrosses of lines selected from GEM germplasm and evaluated at Raleigh, NC; Tifton, GA; and Starkville, MS, in 2007. Aflatoxin Pedigree Raleigh Tifton Starkville Overall ln(y+1) a ng/g b ln(y+1) a ng/g b ln(y+1) a ng/g b ln(y+1) a ng/g b [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-4-4-1-1] Va35 4.11 60 5.18 177 4.02 55 4.44 84 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-4-10-1-1] Va35 4.43 83 5.27 193 3.81 44 4.50 89 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-4-11-1-1] Va35 6.23 507 4.98 144 5.34 207 5.52 247 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-5-1-1-1] Va35 3.67 38 5.18 176 4.27 71 4.37 78 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-5-3-1-1] Va35 4.31 73 4.33 75 3.85 46 4.16 63 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-5-4-1-1] Va35 5.45 232 4.85 127 5.14 170 5.15 171 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-1-1-1] Va35 3.38 28 5.06 156 3.90 49 4.11 60 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-2-B-1] Va35 4.54 93 4.95 140 4.70 109 4.73 112 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-3-1-1] Va35 4.98 145 4.99 145 3.77 42 4.58 96 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-4-1-1] Va35 6.41 608 5.41 224 5.72 305 5.85 346 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-5-1-1] Va35 4.31 73 4.07 58 4.71 111 4.37 78 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-6-1-1] Va35 6.22 500 6.01 406 6.16 473 6.13 458 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-7-1-1] Va35 4.65 103 5.32 203 4.34 76 4.77 116 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-8-1-1] Va35 2.83 16 5.07 158 3.70 40 3.87 47 [(2250_01_XL370AS11-F254_9214_Blk21/00-#)-1-9-1-1] Va35 4.77 117 4.77 117 4.53 92 4.69 108 Mp04:97 Va35 6.46 641 4.70 109 3.99 53 5.05 155 Mp313E Va35 6.25 517 4.95 141 3.29 26 4.83 124 Mp715 Va35 6.21 495 5.62 276 5.51 247 5.78 323 Mp717 Va35 5.69 294 5.32 203 4.90 133 5.30 200 GA209 Va35 7.13 1242 5.97 390 5.90 365 6.33 561 LSD(0.05) 1.50 0.97 1.27 0.72 Mean 5.10 5.10 4.58 4.93 CV 20.6 13.45 19.57 18.05 a Data were transformed [ln(y+1)] before statistical analysis. b Geometric means were calculated by converting transformed means to the original scale.