Shared Care & Survival CTYA SSCRG (Childhood Cancer Research Group)

Similar documents
Methoden / Methods inc. ICCC-3 105

Childhood cancer registration in England: 2015 to 2016

Frequency of non specific morphology codes (ICD O M) within the National Cancer Data Repository ( ) for cancer in Teenagers and Young Adults

National Registry of Childhood Tumours Progress Report, 2010

Childhood Cancer Statistics, England Annual report 2018

CLIC Sargent Eligibility Criteria

13-24 year olds with cancer in England Incidence, mortality and survival

Pediatric Cancer in Idaho,

Pattern of deaths in the year following diagnosis in cancer patients aged years in England. Children and Young Adults CRG

PEDIATRIC CANCER IN IDAHO

PEDIATRIC CANCER IN IDAHO

Chapter 1 MAGNITUDE AND LEADING SITES OF CANCER

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL REVIEW CANCERS AMONG CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS AT A CANCER HOSPITAL IN PAKISTAN

Survival in Teenagers and Young. Adults with Cancer in the UK

RESEARCH COMMUNICATION. Childhood Cancer Incidence and Survival , Thailand: Study from the Thai Pediatric Oncology Group

PEDIATRIC CANCER IN IDAHO

CURRENTLY ENROLLING ONCOLOGY TREATMENT STUDIES (as of 4/27/2017)

Radiation Oncology Study Guide

The International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) is

Cancer Incidence in Belgium

Acknowledgements and Disclaimer

Childhood cancer incidence in Australia, Published December 2009

Epidemiology of Childhood Cancers: Challenges and Opportunities Prof Tezer Kutluk MD PhD, FAAP President UICC, Union for International Cancer Control

Classification of spontaneous brain tumors in rats

PEDIATRIC CANCER IN FLORIDA

Module Guide 2017/18

Characteristics and trends in incidence of childhood cancer in Beijing, China,

A Summary of Childhood Cancer Statistics in Australia,

Open / Closed to Recruitment. POSCU Involvement. Diagnosis Trial Oral Chemo Protocol Title Bone

An international clinical program for the diagnosis and treatment of children, adolescents and young adults with ependymoma

Mohamed Agha, PhD Madeline Riehl, MHSc

Principal Treatment Centres What do the data say for childhood cancer?

CHILDHOOD CANCER SURVIVOR STUDY ANALYSIS CONCEPT PROPOSAL

1. Background & Scope 3

Peter Gozdyra, MA Jack Williams, PhD, FCES Bruna DiMonte, BScN, RN

PEDIATRIC. BRAIN ACNS 0332: Efficacy of Carboplatin Administered Concomitantly with Radiation and Isotretinoin as a COMPANION STUDIES

Proton Beam Therapy. Joint Committee / Committee Resolution (insert ) to: APPROVE ENDORSE SUPPORT NOTE

Site Specific Coding Rules MALIGNANT CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TUMORS

incidence rate x 100,000/year

Supplementary Information

SIOP Europe the European Society for Paediatric Oncology European Network for Cancer Research in Children and Adolescents

Childhood cancer survival : Dr. Behçet Uz Children s Hospital registry

Introduction Pediatric malignancies Changing trends & Radiation burden Radiation exposure from PET/CT Image gently PET & CT modification - PET/CT

Childhood Cancer Report on Cancer Statistics in Alberta. December Cancer Care. Cancer Surveillance

ACR TXIT TM EXAM OUTLINE

Histopathological Study and Categorisation of Brain Tumors

SCIENTIFIC TIMETABLE SIOP 2015

The Northern region Children's malignant disease registry : Incidence and survival

21st Century Pediatric Cancer Sourcebook: Childhood Bone Cancer - Osteosarcoma And Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma (MFH) Of Bone - Clinical Data,

CNS SSCRG Work Programme

Haematological malignancies in England Cancers Diagnosed Haematological malignancies in England Cancers Diagnosed

Tumors of the Fetus and Infant

Tumour Structure and Nomenclature. Paul Edwards. Department of Pathology and Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge

The National Cancer Dataset Initiative ddd CTYA SSCRG. Di Riley Associate Director for Clinical Outcomes

TUESDAY, 18th OCTOBER, 2016 / DAY -2

Supplementary Table S1 Glossary of preferred terms contained in the malignant or unspecified tumors SMQ narrow basket label (MedDRA version 15.

Epidemiology of AYA tumours. Dan Stark, MD Consultant in Medical Oncology Leeds UK

Introduction to Pediatric Neoplasms

Coversheet for Network Site Specific Group Agreed Documentation. Diagnosis and Staging Protocol

1/15/2013. Introduction to Pediatric Neoplasms. Program Outline. Introduction

Proceedings of Congress

State of Art in Pediatric Cancer. Surapon Wiangnon

National Cancer Intelligence Network Routes to Diagnosis:Investigation of melanoma unknowns

Childhood brain tumors in California

End of Grant Report. Registered Charity

A is for Alive Artwork created by St. Jude patient Asia Age: 11 years Diagnosis: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Report on Cancer Statistics in Alberta. Childhood Cancer

The Development of Pediatric Oncology in Turkey:

SUMMARY: YEAR OLDS WITH CANCER IN ENGLAND: INCIDENCE, MORTALITY AND SURVIVAL (2018)

FACULTY MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION Tulane Cancer Center

SOLID TUMOURS IN CHILDHOOD

Bone Sarcoma Incidence and Survival. Tumours Diagnosed Between 1985 and Report Number R12/05

SOUTH THAMES CHILDREN S CANCER NETWORK GROUP. REFERRAL PROTOCOLS AND DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING PROTOCOLS October 2014

Épidémiologie des sarcomes en Belgique

Childhood Cancer. Dr Sarah Taaffe. Grace Kelly LadyBird Trust RCGP Child and Young Persons Cancer E-learning Session

Solid tumors in young children in Moscow Region of Russian Federation

Case 1. Maysa Al-Hussaini MD FRCPath

Epidemiology of Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors in Korea

Regence. Next Review: 08/2019 Last Review: 08/2018 Medicare Link(s) Revised: 10/01/2018 IMPORTANT REMINDER

Update on Sarcomas of the Head and Neck. Kevin Harrington

TUESDAY, 18th OCTOBER, 2016 / DAY -2. THE SPENCER HOTEL Hall A Hall B (St. Lukes Hospital)

Role of immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of malignant small round cell tumor: a study of 38 cases

Frequency of Malignant Solid Tumors in Children

ANNUAL CANCER REGISTRY REPORT-2005

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program ( SEER*Stat version (downloaded 3/23/2017)

Pediatric cancer. Kleebsabai Sanpakit, MD. Hemato/Oncology division, Department of Pediatrics Faculty of Medicine Siriraj hospital

Background. Paediatric cancer. Leukaemia

STUDY OFPAEDIATRIC CNS TUMORS IN TERTIARY CARE CENTER

Pediatric Brain Tumors Pre, Intra & Post Op Evaluation and Management. Timothy M. George, MD, FACS, FAAP

CNS TUMORS. D r. Ali Eltayb ( U. of Omdurman. I ). M. Path (U. of Alexandria)

Clinical Commissioning Policy: Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. December Reference : NHSCB/B4/a/1

Assessing quality of life in sarkoma trials

Radiotherapy in small animals. How is it realized? How does it work? For which patient is it indicated?

Pancreat ic Cancer UK. policy briefing. A cancer of unmet need: the pancreatic cancer research challenge

Protocol for management of patients with pineal region tumours v1

Clinical, radiological, and histopathological features and prognostic factors of brain tumors in children

The adolescents and young adults population (AYA) has

SOUTH THAMES CHILDREN S AND YOUNG PEOPLE S CANCER NETWORK GROUP REFERRAL PROTOCOLS AND DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING PROTOCOLS

Effective January 1, 2018 ICD O 3 codes, behaviors and terms are site specific

Transcription:

Shared Care & Survival CTYA SSCRG (Childhood Cancer Research Group) January 2013

The NCIN is a UK-wide initiative, working to drive improvements in standards of cancer care and clinical outcomes by improving and using the information collected about cancer patients for analysis, publication and research. Sitting within the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI), the NCIN works closely with cancer services in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. In England, the NCIN is part of the National Cancer Programme. The National Cancer Intelligence Unit will be part of Public Health England from 1 st April 2013 Our aims and objectives cover five core areas to improve the quality and availability of cancer data from its collection to use: Promoting efficient and effective data collection throughout the cancer journey Providing a common national repository for cancer datasets Producing expert analyses, to monitor patterns of cancer care Exploiting information to drive improvements in cancer care and clinical outcomes Enabling use of cancer information to support audit and research programmes

Shared Care and Survival from Childhood Cancer in the UK 1997-2009 A questionnaire was sent to all paediatric oncology principal treatment centres (PTCs) in the UK, asking for information about their practice of shared care during 1997-2009. Level of shared care was defined as follows: Little or none Care shared with no more than one paediatric oncology shared care unit (POSCU) Moderate Extensive Several associated POSCUs, but without full coverage of catchment area Comprehensive network of POSCUs throughout the catchment area Table 1 shows the numbers of PTCs at each level of shared care during 1997-2000, 2001-2004 and 2005-2009. Eight PTCs practised extensive shared care throughout the study period. There was a steady increase in the number of PTCs, with a moderate level of shared care and a corresponding decrease in the number with little or none. The analyses that follow are based on all cases of childhood cancer other than retinoblastoma with a registration at diagnosis from any PTC in the UK except Barts/Royal London. Retinoblastoma was excluded because supraregional referral is standard practice for this tumour. Barts/Royal London was excluded because it ceased to be a paediatric oncology PTC during the study period. Table 2 shows the numbers of children registered from a PTC with any cancer except retinoblastoma (groups I-IV, VI-XII in the International Classification of Childhood Cancer, Third Edition (ICCC-3)) before age 15, classified by shared care level at their PTC during 1997-2000, 2001-2004 and 2005-2009. Between 1997-2000 and 2005-2009 the proportion of children registered from PTCs with extensive shared care increased from 50% to 58% and the proportion registered from PTCs with little or no shared care decreased from 39% to 17%. Survival was analysed by PTC level of shared care for all children combined, by broad diagnostic group and by prognostic group. The broad diagnostic groups were leukaemias and lymphomas

(ICCC-3 I and II), CNS tumours including CNS germ-cell tumours (ICCC-3 III and Xa) and all other solid tumours (ICCC-3 IV, VI-IX, Xb-Xe, XI and XII). Prognostic groups were defined according to five-year survival rate during the study period as a whole. The definitions were based on type of cancer, but acute lymphoblastic leukaemia was subdivided by age at diagnosis and Down syndrome status, and medulloblastoma and neuroblastoma were both subdivided by age. The composition of the prognostic groups is shown in Table 3. Finally, survival was analysed by PTC level of shared care for non-down syndrome children aged 1-14 years with ALL. This group was analysed separately because, whereas most children with cancer receive virtually all their chemotherapy at their PTC and shared care is largely limited to supportive care, children with ALL can also receive a substantial proportion of their chemotherapy at a POSCU. It was also the diagnostic group with the largest of patients in the study series. Five-year survival for all children by period of diagnosis and PTC shared care level is shown in Table 4. Survival did not vary significantly by shared care level in any of the three calendar periods for all cancers combined or for any of the three broad diagnostic groups (log-rank p>0.05 throughout). Five-year survival by period of diagnosis, prognostic group and PTC shared care level is shown in Table 5. Survival did not vary significantly by shared care level for any combination of calendar period and prognostic group (log-rank p>0.05 throughout). Five-year survival by period of diagnosis and PTC shared care level for non-down syndrome children aged 1-14 years with ALL is shown in Table 6. Survival did not vary significantly by shared care level in any of the three calendar periods (log-rank p>0.05 throughout). One-year survival was also analysed by PTC shared care level for all combinations of period of diagnosis and diagnostic group covered in Tables 4-6. Survival did not vary significantly by shared care level in any of the three calendar periods for all cancers combined or for any of the diagnostic groups (log-rank p>0.05 throughout; data not shown).

In conclusion, the analyses presented here found no evidence of variation in survival for children with cancer diagnosed during 1997-2009 in relation to the level of shared care at their PTC.

Table 1 Number of paediatric oncology PTCs by level of shared care, UK, 1997-2009 1997-2000 2001-2004 2005-2009 Little or none 10 8 5 Moderate 2 4 7 Extensive 8 8 8 Total 20 20 20 Leicester and Nottingham now operate as a single East Midlands centre but were separate centres during the study period and are counted separately here. Barts/Royal London ceased to be a paediatric oncology PTC during the study period and is not included here. Table 2 Number of newly diagnosed childhood cancer patients by level of shared care at PTC, UK, 1997-2009 1997-2000 2001-2004 2005-2009 Total Little or none 2174 (39%) 1552 (26%) 1245 (17%) 4971 Moderate 599 (11%) 1062 (18%) 1935 (26%) 3596 Extensive 2734 (50%) 3360 (56%) 4334 (58%) 10428 Total 5507 5974 7514 18995 Barts/Royal London patients, children with retinoblastoma, and children with no CCLG registration are excluded.

Table 3 Composition of prognostic groups for survival analysis 5-year survival 90% Hodgkin lymphoma Choroid plexus papilloma Low grade astrocytoma Pituitary adenoma Craniopharyngioma Meningioma Glioneuronal tumours (all types) Intracranial germinoma Wilms tumour Malignant bone tumours NEC Fibrohistiocytic sarcomas Alveolar soft part sarcoma Gonadal germ cell tumours Thyroid carcinoma (all types) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Salivary gland carcinoma 5-year survival 80-89% ALL, non-down syndrome, age 1-14 Chronic myeloid leukaemia Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Neuroblastoma, age <1 Clear cell sarcoma of kidney Hepatoblastoma Fibrosarcoma (excluding MPNST) Leiomyosarcoma Synovial sarcoma Non-CNS extragonadal germ-cell tumours 5-year survival 70-79% 5-year survival 60-69% Mature B-cell leukaemia Medulloblastoma, age 3-14 Pinealoma & pineocytoma Non-germinoma CNS germ-cell tumours Miscellaneous peripheral nervous tumours Pleuropulmonary blastoma ALL, Down syndrome AML Myelodysplasia Leukaemia NEC Ependymoma Oligodendroglioma Astrocytoma NEC Renal carcinoma Ewing sarcoma family tumours (bone & soft tissue) Rhabdomyosarcoma Specified soft tissue sarcoma NEC Adrenocortical carcinoma Malignant melanoma 5-year survival 50-59% ALL, age <1 JMML/CMML Neuroblastoma, age 1-14 Osteosarcoma MPNST Non-germ-cell gonadal tumours Carcinoma NEC

5-year survival <50% Choroid plexus carcinoma High grade astrocytoma Medulloblastoma, age 0-2 PNET ATRT Glioma NEC Pineoblastoma CNS tumour NOS Rhabdoid renal tumour Hepatic carcinoma Chondrosarcoma Renal ppnet Extrarenal rhandoid tumour DSRCT Soft tissue sarcoma NOS Colorectal carcinoma Other specified cancers NEC Cancer NOS Abbreviations: ALL Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia AML Acute myeloid leukaemia ATRT Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour CMML Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia DSRCT Desmoplastic small round cell tumour JMML Juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia MPNST Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour NEC not elsewhere classified NOS not otherwise specified PNET Primitive neuroectodermal tumour ppnet Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour

Table 4 Five-year % survival (95% CI) by period of diagnosis and level of shared care at PTC for all childhood cancers except retinoblastoma and for broad diagnostic groups Diagnostic group Shared care level 1997-2000 2001-2004 2005-2009 All cancers Little or none 74 (72,76) 77 (75,79) 81 (79,83) Moderate 76 (72,79) 76 (73,78) 82 (80,83) Extensive 76 (75,78) 77 (75,78) 80 (79,82) Leukaemia & lymphoma Little or none 81 (78,83) 84 (81,87) 87 (84,90) Moderate 81 (76,85) 85 (82,88) 89 (86,91) Extensive 81 (79,83) 84 (82,86) 89 (87,90) CNS tumours Little or none 69 (65,73) 74 (69,78) 76 (71,80) Moderate 66 (58,73) 70 (64,75) 76 (71,79) Extensive 72 (69,75) 69 (66,72) 72 (69,75) Other solid tumours Little or none 68 (64,71) 71 (67,75) 77 (71,82) Moderate 77 (70,82) 65 (59,70) 75 (71,79) Extensive 72 (69,75) 72 (69,74) 75 (73,78)

Table 5 Five-year % survival (95% CI) by period of diagnosis and levels of shared care at PTC for all childhood cancers except retinoblastoma, for prognostic groups as defined in Table 3 Prognostic group Shared care level 1997-2000 2001-2004 2005-2009 90% Little or none 93 (91,95) 93 (91,95) 95 (92,97) Moderate 91 (85,95) 94 (91,97) 94 (91,96) Extensive 94 (92,96) 94 (92,96) 94 (92,95) 80-89% Little or none 84 (82,87) 89 (86,91) 90 (87,93) Moderate 86 (81,90) 88 (84,90) 93 (90,94) Extensive 85 (82,87) 88 (86,89) 91 (90,93) 70-79% Little or none 77 (67,85) 74 (61,83) 81 (65,90) Moderate 65 (42,81) 70 (55,81) 68 (52,80) Extensive 73 (63,81) 73 (63,80) 69 (60,76) 60-69% Little or none 64 (59,69) 64 (58,70) 67 (59,74) Moderate 69 (59,77) 61 (53,67) 72 (66,78) Extensive 65 (60,69) 64 (60,68) 70 (66,73) 50-59% Little or none 45 (38,52) 51 (42,59) 63 (51,73) Moderate 58 (42,70) 44 (34,55) 57 (48,65) Extensive 51 (45,57) 56 (50,61) 64 (59,69) <50% Little or none 28 (22,34) 36 (28,44) 42 (33,51) Moderate 30 (19,43) 30 (21,40) 28 (20,37) Extensive 37 (31,43) 28 (23,33) 36 (30,41) Table 6 Five-year % survival (95% CI) by period of diagnosis and level of shared care at PTC for non-down syndrome children aged 1-14 years with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia Shared care level 1997-2000 2001-2004 2005-2009 Little or none 86 (83,89) 90 (86,92) 90 (86,93) Moderate 86 (79,90) 89 (84,92) 95 (92,97) Extensive 86 (83,88) 90 (87,91) 93 (91,95)