EVALUATION OF QUANTITATIVE DETECTION OF FECAL HUMAN HAEMOGLOBIN FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING

Similar documents
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub Jun; 156(2):

FECAL OCCULT BLOOD TEST (FOBT) Common Guaiac versus Immunochemical Test

Quantitative immunochemical tests: evidence on accuracy and implementation considerations in the Czech MUDr.. Petr Kocna, CSc.

PROCEDURE. Sekisui Diagnostics OSOM ifob Rapid Test. Title: Procedure #: Institution: Prepared by: Date: Title: Accepted by: Date adopted: Title:

Challenges for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) for Screening and Symptomatic Patients

ifob Test Rev. P5576-A, 04/16 5. Read the result in 5-10 minutes. RESULTS AFTER 10 MINUTES. Important: DO NOT READ

The choice of methods for Colorectal Cancer Screening; The Dutch experience

Diagnostics guidance Published: 26 July 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/dg30

Journal of Clinical Laboratory Instruments and Reagents, Vol. 34, No. 3 (June, 2011) Supplement

ifob Test Rev. P /15 6. Read the result in 5-10 minutes. RESULTS AFTER 10 MINUTES. Important: DO NOT READ

Evaluation of a desk top instrument for the automated development and immunochemical quantifi cation of fecal occult blood

CerTest Turbilatex. A quantitative immunological latex method. FOB Calprotectin Transferrin H. pylori

Rapid-VIDITEST. FOB+Tf. One step Fecal Occult Blood Card Test. Instruction manual

EVALUATION OF QUANTITATIVE FAECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTS FOR HAEMOGLOBIN

COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING &THE FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST (FIT) MATHEW ESTEY, PHD, FCACB CLINICAL CHEMIST

Optimizing implementation of fecal immunochemical testing in Ontario: A randomized controlled trial

Primary care at the forefront of colorectal cancer screening

NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programmes: Evaluation of pilot of Faecal Immunochemical Test : Final report.

Updates in Colorectal Cancer Screening & Prevention

Rapid-VIDITEST FOB Blister

JOHN H. STROGER HOSPITAL OF COOK COUNTY ANNUAL TRAINING HEMOCCULT

PROCEDURE MANUAL. Prepared By Date Adopted Supersedes Procedure # Review Date Revision Date Signature

Rapid-VIDITEST. Calprotectin-Lactoferrin

Global colorectal cancer screening appropriate or practical? Graeme P Young, Flinders University WCC, Melbourne

CLIA Complexity: WAIVED INTENDED USE SUMMARY AND EXPLANATION

Biocard. 1. Troponin I

Faecal testing in colorectal cancer screening: State of the Art. Prof Stephen P. Halloran

CLIA Complexity: Waived

What I ll discuss. Head to Head Comparisons of Different FITs. What makes a FIT good? What makes a good FIT? Good performance

The New Grade A: USPSTF Updated Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines, What does it all mean?

T. Rubeca 1, S. Rapi 2, M. Confortini 1, M. Brogioni 2, G. Grazzini 1, M. Zappa 1, D. Puliti 1, G. Castiglione 1, S. Ciatto 1

Reflections on the EUnetHTA CRC screening full Core Model pilot 1

Title: Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests. Date: June 15, 2007

Colorectal Cancer Prevention Hospital Universitário São Paulo University

The next generation portable diagnostics system: Over 20 parameters available!

Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Wyoming. Allie Bain, MPH Outreach & Education Supervisor Wyoming Integrated Cancer Services Program

«Colorectal cancer screening in the regions of the Russian Federation: Stanislav Konovalov Leading expert in HTSA Plus program

Fecal immunochemical testing results and characteristics of colonic lesions

Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun Medical College in Bydgoszcz Family Doctor Department CANCER PREVENTION IN GENERAL PRACTICE

CRC Risk Factors. U.S. Adherence Rates Cancer Screening. Genetic Model of Colorectal Cancer. Epidemiology and Clinical Consequences of CRC

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

A TEST FOR COLORECTAL CANCER THAT IS 92% SENSITIVE AND NON-INVASIVE. Stool DNA test

CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING

Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Clinical Update

The York Faecal Calprotectin Care Pathway for use in primary care. James Turvill

CHAPTER 7 Higher FIT cut-off levels: lower positivity rates but still acceptable detection rates for early stage colorectal cancers

Rapid-VIDITEST Calprotectin

Cancer Screening I have no conflicts of interest. Principles of screening. Cancer in the World Page 1. Letting Evidence Be Our Guide

Alberta Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (ACRCSP) Post Polypectomy Surveillance Guidelines

biorapid FOBT 20 Test cod

Earlier stages of colorectal cancer detected with immunochemical faecal occult blood tests

Anton Gies, PhD student, Katarina Cuk, PhD, Petra Schrotz-King, PhD, Hermann Brenner, MD, MPH

Paris classification (2003) 삼성의료원내과이준행

Why FIT (Faecal Immunochemical Test) is the best biomarker for CRC screening

Financial Disclosers

CLIA Complexity: WAIVED

Supplementary Online Content

Colorectal Cancer Screening

IEHP UM Subcommittee Approved Authorization Guidelines Colorectal Cancer Screening with Cologuard TM for Medicare Beneficiaries

Get tested for. Colorectal cancer. Doctors know how to prevent colon or rectal cancer- and you can, too. Take a look inside.

FY 2017 MCRCEDP Procedure Code Reference Chart

FECAL OCCULT BLOOD TEST

Rapid-VIDITEST. Helicobacter pylori. One step Helicobacter pylori Blister test. Instruction manual

proposed Vienna classification of gastrointestinal

Dr Alasdair Patrick Gastroenterologist

Colorectal Cancer Screening

FIT Overview. Objectives 6/23/2014

PROCEDURE MANUAL. Prepared By Date Adopted Supersedes Procedure # Review Date Revision Date Signature

Value of symptoms and additional diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis

Citation for published version (APA): Wijkerslooth de Weerdesteyn, T. R. (2013). Population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy

Early detection and screening for colorectal neoplasia

Practical challenges in establishing and running the Czech national colorectal cancer screening programme

Page 1. Selected Controversies. Cancer Screening! Selected Controversies. Breast Cancer Screening. ! Using Best Evidence to Guide Practice!

References. Valorization

Cancer Prevention and Control, Provider-Oriented Screening Interventions: Provider Assessment and Feedback Colorectal Cancer (2008 Archived Review)

A Proposal to Standardize Reporting Units for Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Hemoglobin

FIT Laboratory update

Colorectal cancer screening

Recommendations on Screening for Colorectal Cancer 2016

HTA September health technology assessment rapid review. Supporting Informed Decisions. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health

Combination of Sigmoidoscopy and a Fecal Immunochemical Test to Detect Proximal Colon Neoplasia

Structured Follow-Up after Colorectal Cancer Resection: Overrated. R. Taylor Ripley University of Colorado Grand Rounds April 23, 2007

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Colorectal Cancer Screening What are my options?

Implementation of Faecal Immunochemical Testing as the screening test for Bowel Screening. Programme in Wales

Page 1. Cancer Screening for Women I have no conflicts of interest. Overview. Breast, Colon, and Lung Cancer. Jeffrey A.

Wellness Along the Cancer Journey: Healthy Habits and Cancer Screening Revised October 2015 Chapter 7: Cancer Screening and Early Detection of Cancer

IJC International Journal of Cancer

Unfortunately you re not. So talk to your health care provider about screening today.

Cologuard Screening for Colorectal Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening. A Provider Opinion Survey

A: PARTICIPANT INFORMATION

Written By: Joann O Connor Date: 01/27/2017 Effective Date: 02/22/2017 1

Rx Only. Detecting Cancer In Blood.

MADE IN KOREA. Advanced POCT. Automated 6 Channels. Automated Single Channel. POCT to Desktop. Our technology covers it all!

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THREE FECAL OCCULT BLOOD TESTS IN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING

North West London Pathology. Faecal Occult Blood testing. Mrs Sophie Barnes FRCPath Consultant Clinical Scientist

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF QUANTITATIVE DETECTION OF FECAL HUMAN HAEMOGLOBIN FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING

Kocna P., Vaníčková Z., Kovářová J., Krechler T., Kohout P., Beneš Z., Granátová J. Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 4th Internal Department - 1st Medical Faculty of Charles University & General Faculty Hospital, 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Clinical Chemistry; Faculty Thomayer Hospital; Prague, Czech Republic

ABSTRACT Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CR-CA) screening in the Czech Republic has been done for thirty years using guajac Haemoccult test. Quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test (qi-fobt) appears to be far the best in the world at present. This study evaluates this qi-fobt for screening in the Czech Republic. Patients and methods: 813 consecutive patients indicated to colonoscopy were enrolled to this study. Immunochemical quantitative tests were run using OC- SENSORμ analyser (EIKEN, Japan). Values of qi-fobt (ng/ml) were calculated as mean of two samples, and optimal cut-off value was evaluated in the range 75-150 ng/ml. Results: Values of qi-fobt (mean ± SD) were 45.4 ± 70.9 in the control group, 73.9 ± 106.2 for small polyps <10 mm, 776.5 ± 721.1 for advanced polyps >10 mm and 782.5 ± 387.5 for CR-CA cases. With cut-off value 75 ng/ml was the sensitivity 75 %, specificity 84 %, accuracy 82 %, positive predictive value 50.5 % and negative predictive value 95.5 % to detect advanced polyps and tumors compared to control group. Conclusions: Quantitative aspect of immunochemical detection of haemoglobin in the stool clearly offers new dimension for non-invasive laboratory screening of colorectal cancer. This multicenter study of 813 patients evaluated by colonoscopy will now be used as analytically defined background for CR-CA screening population study in the Czech Republic.

OC-SENZORμ - ANALYSER Fully automated FOB analyzer Latex agglutination immuno-turbidimetry One step rate assay Throughput 80 samples / hour Disposal acrylic 5 mm cuvette Thermostatic 37 C block heater Reagent storage 25 C block heater Light source L.E.D. - 660 nm Light detector - silicon photo diode Memory capacity 999 test results Built-in thermal printer + RS-232C Built-in barcode reader

OC-SENSOR SAMPLING CASETTE OC-Sensor sampling devices were optimized to semi-quantitative fecal quantity (10 mg ± 10%), stabilizing extraction, filtration of heterogenous fecal solution and injection of 25 μl to measuring cuvette. Feces collected using the collecting stick Feces then dissolved in 2 ml buffer Inject of 25 μl sample 10 mg of feces pushed thru a scrapper & membrane Filtration and sample transfer to load-cup

METHODS 813 patients (410 men, 413 women, mean age 57.4 years) were included to this study. 22 patients were exluded (menses and hematuria during stool sampling) total colonoscopy was performed on 682 patients (83.88%) partial colonoscopy, with double-contrast barium enema or CT colography, was performed in 109 patients (13.37%). Group Finding Count % Mean 95%CI 1 Normal 189 23.19 26.43 14.63-38.23 1h Hemorrhoids 226 27.73 61.26 30.60-91.90 1+1h Normal incl. hemor. 415 45.40 45.40 27.84-62.94 2 Polyp 9mm 170 20.86 73.90 30.78-117.01 3 Polyp 10mm 43 5.28 776.51 488.63-1064 4 Carcinoma 31 3.80 782.48 605.76-959.19 5 Inflammation 73 8.96 523.32 384.10-662.52

RESULTS Group Finding Mean First Highest 1 Normal 47.58 45.39 75.19 2 Polyp 9mm 69.07 73.90 108.23 3 Polyp 10mm 788.26 776.51 896.53 4 Carcinoma 773.08 782.48 947.23 V2 neoplasia/dysplasia 15.97 15.96 21.91 V3 neoplasia/dysplasia 167.57 152.15 370.77 V4 neoplasia/dysplasia 600.60 668.57 722.85 V5 neoplasia/dysplasia 708.74 708.8 877.63 5 Inflammation 577.20 523.32 766.14 Schlemper RJ et all. Gut 2000, 47: 251: The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia V1 Negative for neoplasia/dysplasia V2 Indefinite for neoplasia/dysplasia V3 Non-invasive low grade neoplasia - low grade adenoma/dysplasia V4 Non-invasive high grade neoplasia: 4-1 High grade adenoma/dysplasia, 4.2 Non-invasive carcinoma (carcinoma in situ), 4.3 Suspicion of invasive carcinoma V5 Invasive neoplasia: 5.1 Intramucosal carcinoma, 5.2 Submucosal carcinoma or beyond

STUDY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC ng Hb/ml 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 800 489-1064 ng/ml mean 776 ng/ml 606-959 ng/ml mean 782 ng/ml 600 600 400 400 200 200 0 28-63 ng/ml 31-117 ng/ml mean 45 ng/ml mean 74 ng/ml ifobt - OC Micro - Eiken cut-off 75 ng/ml NORMAL ADENOM ADV.ADENOM CANCER Results of this study - 2008 in the Czech Republic are compared with results published by Levi Z. et all. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:244-255: A Quantitative Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Neoplasia

CUT-OFF OPTIMALIZATION 90 85 80 75 70 65 % SENSITIVITY SPECIFICITY ACCURACY 60 50 75 100 125 150 ng/ml Parameters of qi-fobt for Clinically Significant Neoplasms for different fecal hemoglobin thresholds for the higher of the two tests. Specificity, sensitivity and accuracy for range 50-75 -100-125 and 150 ng/ml Hb.

CUT-OFF OPTIMALIZATION 1 0,9 True positive rate (Sensitivity) 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1 0 - First sample - Highest sample 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1 False positive rate (1-Specificity) ROC analysis of group 1 - control group against group of clinically significant neoplasms for both the first and the higher of the two tests

CONCLUSIONS Quantitative aspect of immunochemical detection of haemoglobin in the stool clearly offers new dimension for non-invasive laboratory screening of colorectal cancer. This multicenter study of 813 patients evaluated by colonoscopy was used to optimize screening parameters using OC-Sensor tests. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the first test, the mean of the two tests, and the higher of the two tests, relative to the cut-off values of 50,75,100,125,150 ng/ml of hemoglobin in the stool in the group having clinically significant neoplasms and in the group having confirmed colorectal carcinoma were statistically evaluated. The optimal cut-off for population screening in the Czech Republic was found to be 75 ng/ml and the number of tests required was found to be one. We calculated the sensitivity 75 %, specificity 84 % and accuracy 82 % for cut-off value 75 ng/ml. This study was supported by Eiken Chemical Company, Japan and Dialab, Czech Republic.