Combining Different Marker Densities in Genomic Evaluation

Similar documents
Genetic Recessives and Carrier Codes

Investigation of Regional Bias in Dairy Cattle Genomic Evaluations. A Senior Project. presented to. the Faculty of the Dairy Science Department

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Imputation of Missing Genotypes from Sparse to High Density using Long-Range Phasing

MBG* Animal Breeding Methods Fall Final Exam

Overview of Animal Breeding

5/6/2015. Milk Production per Cow in the US. Current World Records

Usage of Predictors for Fertility in the Genetic Evaluation, Application in the Netherlands

QTL detection for traits of interest for the dairy goat industry

Estimates of Genetic Parameters for the Canadian Test Day Model with Legendre Polynomials for Holsteins Based on More Recent Data

CDCB Health Traits. CDCB Genomic Nominators & Labs Workshop. Kristen Parker Gaddis, CDCB Geneticist

Adjustment for Heterogeneous Herd-Test-Day Variances

Prediction of Son's Modified Contemporary Comparison from Pedigree Information

A family-based imputation algorithm

The Dairy Cattle Reproduction Council does not support one product over another. Any mention herein is only meant as an example, not an endorsement.

Validation of genomic and genetic evaluations in 305d production traits of Nordic Holstein cattle

Update on global collaborative research in the area of genetics of feed efficiency

Chromosomal regions underlying noncoagulation of milk in Finnish Ayrshire cows

Genomic predictions for dry matter intake using the international reference population of gdmi

Impacts of genomic. pre-selection on classical genetic evaluations. Vincent Ducrocq, Clotilde Patry. Vincent Ducrocq & Clotilde Patry

Chapter 7: Pedigree Analysis B I O L O G Y

BST227 Introduction to Statistical Genetics. Lecture 4: Introduction to linkage and association analysis

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED MILK SPECTRA

GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDIES

Pedigree Analysis. A = the trait (a genetic disease or abnormality, dominant) a = normal (recessive)

Role of Genomics in Selection of Beef Cattle for Healthfulness Characteristics

Double The Muscle: Genotype and Probability

BREEDING, SELECTION AND SOMATIC CELL COUNTS: WHERE ARE WE TODAY? George Shook Dairy Science Department University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin

Patterns of Heredity Genetics

Genetics Honors NOtes 2017 SHORT p2.notebook. May 26, 2017

The French Cryobank of biological material as safe ex-situ conservation C. Danchin-Burge INRA - UMR GABI / Institut de l'elevage France

AL Van Eenennaam University of California, Davis. MM Rolf Kansas State University. BP Kinghorn University of New England, NSW, Australia

SEVERAL studies have reported genotype-by-environment

By Mir Mohammed Abbas II PCMB 'A' CHAPTER CONCEPT NOTES

Analysis of Persistency of Lactation Calculated from a Random Regression Test Day Model

(b) What is the allele frequency of the b allele in the new merged population on the island?

Statistical Indicators E-34 Breeding Value Estimation Ketose

2018 Innovative Grazing Forum

Genomic Selection for Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Barley

Variation in linkage disequilibrium patterns between populations of different production types VERONIKA KUKUČKOVÁ, NINA MORAVČÍKOVÁ, RADOVAN KASARDA

Use of a Weighted Random Regression Test-Day Model to Better Relate Observed Somatic Cell Score to Mastitis Infection Likelihood

B-4.7 Summarize the chromosome theory of inheritance and relate that theory to Gregor Mendel s principles of genetics

«Development of milk data control system for reducing the bias of genomic evaluation for the Russian Holstein breed»

Pedigree Analysis Why do Pedigrees? Goals of Pedigree Analysis Basic Symbols More Symbols Y-Linked Inheritance

Genetic Evaluation for Resistance to Metabolic Diseases in Canadian Dairy Breeds

Genetics Mutations 2 Teacher s Guide

An Introduction to Quantitative Genetics I. Heather A Lawson Advanced Genetics Spring2018

Genetic evaluation of mastitis in France

QTL by environment interaction for milk yield traits on Bos

A simple strategy for managing many recessive disorders in a dairy cattle breeding program

Genetic Parameters of Test-Day Somatic Cell Score Estimated with a Random Regression Model

Genome-Wide Associations for Progesterone Profiles in Holstein-Friesian Dairy Cows

Genetic parameters for major milk proteins in three French dairy cattle breeds

Heritability Estimates for Conformation Traits in the Holstein Breed Gladys Huapaya and Gerrit Kistemaker Canadian Dairy Network

New Applications of Conformation Trait Data for Dairy Cow Improvement

draw and interpret pedigree charts from data on human single allele and multiple allele inheritance patterns; e.g., hemophilia, blood types

Genetics Practice Problems

Characterization of quantitative trait loci for growth and meat quality in a cross between commercial breeds of swine

Alternative use of Somatic Cells Counts in genetic selection for mastitis resistance: a new selection index for Italian Holstein breed

Codominance. P: H R H R (Red) x H W H W (White) H W H R H W H R H W. F1: All Roan (H R H W x H R H W ) Name: Date: Class:

Association mapping (qualitative) Association scan, quantitative. Office hours Wednesday 3-4pm 304A Stanley Hall. Association scan, qualitative

Laboratory. Mendelian Genetics

Genome screen for twinning rate QTL in four North American Holstein families

DAIRY cattle and other livestock species have under- typic, pedigree, and genetic marker information. The

Animal Science USAMV Iaşi; University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Ion Ionescu de la Brad Iaşi ; Institute of Life Sciences at

Unit 8.1: Human Chromosomes and Genes

Determination of genetic effects of ATF3 and CDKN1A genes on milk yield and compositions in Chinese Holstein population

Genes and Inheritance (11-12)

The laws of Heredity. Allele: is the copy (or a version) of the gene that control the same characteristics.

Genetic aspects of milk β-hydroxybutyrate in Italian Holstein cows

14.1 Human Chromosomes pg

Lab 5: Testing Hypotheses about Patterns of Inheritance

Holstein-Friesian vs 3-breed crossbred dairy cows within a low and moderate concentrate input system

Name Class Date. KEY CONCEPT The chromosomes on which genes are located can affect the expression of traits.

Chromosomes, Mapping, and the Meiosis-Inheritance Connection. Chapter 13

MENDELIAN GENETICS. Law of Dominance: Law of Segregation: GAMETE FORMATION Parents and Possible Gametes: Gregory Mendel:

Prediction of Breeding Value Using Bivariate Animal Model for Repeated and Single Records

Mendel: Understanding Inheritance. 7 th Grade Science Unit 4 NCFE Review

Science 1.9 AS WORKBOOK. Working to Excellence

Can Genomics be Used to Improve Reproductive Performance?

Ch 6.2 Inheritance in Sex Linked Genes.notebook April 19, 2018

Introduction to LOH and Allele Specific Copy Number User Forum

Question 2: Which one of the following is the phenotypic monohybrid ratio in F2 generation? (a) 3:1 (b) 1:2:1 (c) 2:2 (d) 1:3 Solution 2: (a) 3 : 1

Genetic analysis of the growth rate of Israeli Holstein calves

Driving Question: What difference does it make if a gene is part of the X Chromosome?

HST.161 Molecular Biology and Genetics in Modern Medicine Fall 2007

Mendelian Genetics and Beyond Chapter 4 Study Prompts

Solutions to Genetics Unit Exam

Fine-mapping QTL for mastitis resistance on BTA9 in three Nordic red cattle breeds

Page 2. Q1.Figure 1 shows a human body cell. Figure 1. Which part in Figure 1 contains chromosomes? Tick one box. A B C

5/2/18. After this class students should be able to: Stephanie Moon, Ph.D. - GWAS. How do we distinguish Mendelian from non-mendelian traits?

UNIT 2: GENETICS Chapter 7: Extending Medelian Genetics

Genetics: field of biology that studies heredity, or the passing of traits from parents to offspring Trait: an inherited characteristic, such as eye

Abstract. Keywords: Genetic evaluation, Health, Metabolic biomarkers, Animal model, Nordic Dairy Cattle, breeding values.

Chapter 1 : Genetics 101

Name: PS#: Biol 3301 Midterm 1 Spring 2012

Meiosis and Genetics

Update of Economic Breeding Index

Beef Cattle Handbook

Extra Review Practice Biology Test Genetics

Transcription:

Combining Different Marker Densities in Genomic Evaluation 1, Jeff O Connell 2, George Wiggans 1, Kent Weigel 3 1 Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 3 University of Wisconsin Dept. Dairy Science, Madison, WI, USA Paul.VanRaden@ars.usda.gov 2007

Topics Filling missing SNPs (imputation) Find haplotypes from genotypes Use lower density to track higher Programs implemented April Actual mixes of 3K with 50K Simulated mixes of 50K with 500K Calculating reliabilities Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (2)

Mixing Different Chips Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (3)

What is imputation? Genotypes indicate how many copies of each allele were inherited Haplotypes indicate which alleles are on which chromosome Use observed genotypes to impute unknown haplotypes Pedigree haplotyping uses relatives Population haplotyping finds matching allele patterns Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (4)

Why impute haplotypes? Predict unknown SNP from known Measure 3,000, predict 50,000 SNP Measure 50,000, predict 500,000 Measure each haplotype at highest density only a few times Predict dam from progeny SNP Increase reliabilities for less cost Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (5)

Haplotyping Program findhap.f90 Begin with population haplotyping Divide chromosomes into segments, ~250 SNP / segment List haplotypes by genotype match Similar to FastPhase, IMPUTE End with pedigree haplotyping Detect crossover, fix noninheritance Impute nongenotyped ancestors Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (6)

Recent Program Revisions Imputation and GEBV reliability are better than in 9WCGALP paper Changes since January Use known haplotype if second is unknown Use current instead of base frequency Combine parent haplotypes if crossover is detected Begin search with parent or grandparent haplotypes Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (7)

Most Frequent Haplotypes 5.16% 022222222020020022002020200020000200202000022022222202220 4.37% 022020220202200020022022200002200200200000200222200002202 4.36% 022020022202200200022020220000220202200002200222200202220 3.67% 022020222020222002022022202020000202220000200002020002002 3.66% 022222222020222022020200220000020222202000002020220002022 3.65% 022020022202200200022020220000220202200002200222200202222 3.51% 022002222020222022022020220200222002200000002022220002220 3.42% 022002222002220022022020220020200202202000202020020002020 3.24% 022222222020200000022020220020200202202000202020020002020 3.22% 022002222002220022002020002220000202200000202022020202220 Most frequent haplotype in first segment of chromosome 15 for Holsteins had 4,316 copies = 41,822 * 2 *.0516 Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (8)

Example Bull: O-StyleO USA137611441, Sire = O-ManO Read genotypes, write haplotypes Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (9)

Find Haplotypes AB coding Genotypes: Oman Ostyle BB,AA,AA,AB,AA,AB,AB,AA,AA,AB BB,AA,AA,AB,AB,AA,AA,AA,AA,AB Haplotypes: OStyle (pat) OStyle (mat) B A A _ A A A A A _ B A A _ B A A A A _ Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (10)

Find Haplotypes 0,1,2 coding Genotypes: codes 0 = BB, 1 = AB or BA, 2 = AA Oman 0 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 Ostyle 0 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 Haplotypes: codes 0 = B, 1 = unknown, 2 = A OStyle (pat) 0 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 OStyle (mat) 0 2 2 1 0 2 2 2 2 1 Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (11)

O-Style Haplotypes chromosome 15 Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (12)

How does imputation work? Identify haplotypes in population using many markers Track haplotypes with fewer markers e.g., use 5 SNP to track 25 SNP 5 SNP: 22020 25 SNP: 2022020002002002000202200 Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (13)

Imputed Dams If progeny and sire both genotyped First progeny inherits 1 of dam s 2 haplotypes Second progeny has 50:50 chance to get same or other haplotype Haplotypes known with 1, 2, 3, etc. progeny are ~50%, 75%, 87%, etc. Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (14)

Better Communication is Needed Progeny genotypes should affect dam, but programs are not yet available Jan 2009 USDA Changes Memo Programs are available to impute 1300 dams Oct 2009 USDA report to Council Encourage USDA to use genotypes, derived by imputation, in genetic evaluation Oct 2009 Holstein USA Board of Directors (in Holstein Pulse) Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (15)

Haplotyping Tests Real Data Half of young animals assigned 3K Proven bulls, cows all had 50K Dams imputed using 50K and 3K Half of ALL animals assigned 3K Could 3K reference animals help? 10,000 proven bulls yet to genotype Should cows with 3K be predictors? Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (16)

Correlations 2 of 3K and PA with 50K Half of YOUNG animals had 3K PTA, half 50K PTA Trait Corr(3K,50K) 2 Corr(PA,50K) 2 Gain NM$.899.518 79% Milk.920.523 83% Fat.920.516 83% Prot.920.555 82% PL.933.498 87% SCS.912.417 85% DPR.937.539 86% Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (17)

Using 3K as Reference Genotypes Half of ALL animal NM$ were from 3K, half 50K REL Gain as compared to all 50K Breed 50K prog 3K prog Imputed dams HO 90% 73% 36% JE 82% 56% 44% BS 84% 72% 55% Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (18)

Simulated 500K Genotypes Linkage in base population Similar to actual linkage reported by: De Roos et al, 2008 Genetics 179:1503 Villa-Angulo et al, 2009 BMC Genetics 10:19 Underlying linkage corresponds to D Three subsets of mixed 50K and 500K: Of 33,414, only 1,586 (young) had 500K Also bulls > 99% REL, total 3,726 Also bulls > 90% REL, total 7,398 Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (19)

Results from 500K Simulation Density Single Mixed Single Chips 50K 50K and 500K 500K Missing N = 0 1,586 3,726 7,398 33,414 Before 1% 88% 80% 70% 1% After.05% 5.3% 2.3% 1.5%.05% REL 82.6 83.4 83.6 83.7 84.0 Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (20)

REL Using Only 3K, 50K, or 500K with increasing numbers of bulls 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 PA only 2,500 10,000 25,000 100,000 3K 50K 500K Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (21)

Conclusions Genomic evaluations can mix different chip densities to save $ (or or ) New programs implemented in April Only a few thousand of highest density genotypes needed, and other animals imputed More animals can be genotyped to increase selection differential and size of reference population Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (22)

Acknowledgments Curt Van Tassell of BFGL selected the 3,209 low density SNP Bob Schnabel of U. Missouri fixed map locations for several SNP Mel Tooker assisted with computation Interbull meeting, Riga, Latvia May (23)