Imaging Overview for Vulnerable Plaque: Data from IVUS Trial and An Introduction to VH-IVUS Imgaging

Similar documents
Invasive Coronary Imaging Modalities for Vulnerable Plaque Detection

Gary S. Mintz,, MD. IVUS Observations in Acute (vs Chronic) Coronary Artery Disease: Structure vs Function

Imaging Atheroma The quest for the Vulnerable Plaque

Pathology of Vulnerable Plaque Angioplasty Summit 2005 TCT Asia Pacific, Seoul, April 28-30, 2005

Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Columbia University Medical Center, New York.

Assessment of Vulnerable Plaque by IVUS and VH-IVUS

Can IVUS Define Plaque Features that Impact Patient Care?

Plaque Characteristics in Coronary Artery Disease. Chourmouzios Arampatzis MD, PhD, FESC

The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

Added Value of Invasive Coronary Imaging for Plaque Rupture and Erosion

The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

IVUS Analysis. Myeong-Ki. Hong, MD, PhD. Cardiac Center, Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Pathology of Coronary Artery Disease

Assessment of vulnerable plaque by OCT

Assessment of plaque morphology by OCT in patients with ACS

OCT Findings: Lesson from Stable vs Unstable Plaques

Culprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

OCT; Comparative Imaging Results with IVUS, VH and Angioscopy

IVUS Virtual Histology. Listening through Walls D. Geoffrey Vince, PhD The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Can We Identify Vulnerable Patients & Vulnerable Plaque?

1st Department of Cardiology, University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece

2yrs 2-6yrs >6yrs BMS 0% 22% 42% DES 29% 41% Nakazawa et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:

Chapter 43 Noninvasive Coronary Plaque Imaging

Left main coronary artery (LMCA): The proximal segment

Optical Coherence Tomography for Intracoronary Imaging

as a Mechanism of Stent Failure

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY. Konstantina P. Bouki, FESC 2 nd Department of Cardiology General Hospital Of Nikea, Pireaus

대한심장학회춘계학술대회 Satellite Symposium

High-risk vulnerable plaques. Kostis Raisakis G.Gennimatas General Hospital of Athens

Ambiguity in Detection of Necrosis in IVUS Plaque Characterization Algorithms and SDH as Alternative Solution

Coronary Artery Thermography

State of the Art. Advances in Cardiovascular Imaging. ESC Congres Stockholm September 1, 2010 Frank E. Rademakers, MD, PhD, FESC

Pathology of the Vulnerable Plaque

Vulnerable Plaque Pathophysiology, Detection, and Intervention. VP: A Local Problem or Systemic Disease. Erling Falk, Denmark

The Dynamic Nature of Coronary Artery Lesion Morphology Assessed by Serial Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound Tissue Characterization

CT Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque. William Stanford MD Professor-Emeritus Radiology University of Iowa College of Medicine Iowa City, IA

Medical sciences 1 (2017) 1 9

Κλινική Χρήση IVUS και OCT PERIKLIS A. DAVLOUROS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF CARDIOLOGY INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY & CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

Tissue Characterization of Coronary Plaques Using Intravascular Ultrasound/Virtual Histology

Usefulness of OCT during coronary intervention

From the Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque to CAD Management

Multimodality Imaging Atlas of Coronary Atherosclerosis

Dynamic Nature of Nonculprit Coronary Artery Lesion Morphology in STEMI

Noninvasive Coronary Imaging: Plaque Imaging by MDCT

Le espressioni della placca che preoccupano il clinico: progressione o vulnerabilità? CardioLUCCA Marzo 2017

TVA_C02.qxd 8/8/06 10:27 AM Page 19 PART 2. Pathology

Cottrell Memorial Lecture. Has Reversing Atherosclerosis Become the New Gold Standard in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease?

So-Yeon Choi, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiology Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea

Between Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve

Histopathology: Vascular pathology

Spotty Calcification as a Marker of Accelerated Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis : Insights from Serial Intravascular Ultrasound

Chapter 11. Departments of 1 Cardiology and 2 Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Department of Cardiology,

Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR for LM Stenting

Review Article Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging in Acute Coronary Syndromes

FESC, FACC, MAHA, MSCAI, MEAPSI, ESH

MR Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaques

Invasive Imaging (IVUS, VH-IVUS, and OCT): How I Implement into My

Atherosclerosis 229 (2013) 124e129. Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect. Atherosclerosis

New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA

Spotty Calcification Typifies the Culprit Plaque in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction An Intravascular Ultrasound Study

Integrating IVUS, FFR, and Noninvasive Imaging to Optimize Outcomes. Gary S. Mintz, MD Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Yukio Ozaki, M Okumura, TF Ismail 2, S Motoyama, H. Naruse, K. Hattori, H. Kawai, M. Sarai, J. Ishii, Jagat Narula 3

CARDIAC IMAGING FOR SUBCLINICAL CAD

Scott W. Murray 1,2, Billal Patel 1, Rodney H. Stables 1, Raphael A. Perry 1, Nicholas D. Palmer 1. Introduction

FFR and intravascular imaging, which of which?

Insights in Thrombosis and In-Stent Restenosis

IVUS vs FFR Debate: IVUS-Guided PCI

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

Invasive Evaluation of High Risk or Vulnerable Plaque A Powerful Tool to Address Potential Pharmacological Agents? Jagat Narula, MD PhD MACC

Malaysian Healthy Ageing Society

Quick guide. Core. precision guided therapy system

Catch-up Phenomenon: Insights from Pathology

Jose Mª de la Torre Hernandez, MD, PhD, FESC. Cardiologia Valdecilla Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla Santander. SPAIN

Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary lesions: Can You Handle the Pressure? Jeffrey A Southard, MD May 4, 2013

OCT. molecular imaging J Jpn Coll Angiol, 2008, 48: molecular imaging MRI positron-emission tomography PET IMT

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 45, No. 12, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /05/$30.

THE COMPLEX RELATION BETWEEN VULNERABILITY AND ISCHEMIA a paradigm shift

CHAPTER (2) THE VULNERABLE PLAQUE

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

Adverse Cardiovascular Events Arising From Atherosclerotic Lesions With and Without Angiographic Disease Progression

Clinical Value of OCT. Guidance for Coronary Stenting. Giulio Guagliumi, MD

Sibin K Zacharias 1, Robert D Safian 1, Ryan D Madder 2, Ivan D Hanson 1, Mark C Pica 1, James L Smith 1, James A Goldstein 1 and Amr E Abbas 1

OCT GUIDED TREATMENT OF CALCIFIED LESIONS RICHARD SHLOFMITZ, MD CHAIRMAN OF DEPT. OF CARDIOLOGY ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL ROSLYN, NEW YORK

Machine Learning in Precision Medicine Coronary Health Prediction - Cardiac Events (Atherosclerosis) - Heart Transplant (Vasculopathy)

actually rupture! Challenges to the vulnerable plaque concept

Optical Coherence Tomography

Intravascular Ultrasound

Characterization of coronary plaques with combined use of intravascular ultrasound, virtual histology and optical coherence tomography

PCI for Left Anterior Descending Artery Ostial Stenosis

Role of Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Failure of positive. Recanalization and CTO formation. TCFA rupture with (fatal) thrombotic occlusion. TCFA Lipid pool

Assessment of Vulnerable Plaques Causing Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Integrated Backscatter Intravascular Ultrasound

THE EFFECT OF CALCIFIED PLAQUE ON STRESS WITHIN A FIBROUS THIN CAP ATHEROMA IN AN ATHEROSCLEROTIC CORONARY ARTERY USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS (FEA)

pissn: , eissn: Yonsei Med J 54(2): , 2013

CPIS So-Yeon Choi, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiology Ajou University School of MedicineSuwon, Korea

Attenuated Plaque at Nonculprit Lesions in Patients Enrolled in Intravascular Ultrasound Atherosclerosis Progression Trials

Review Article Pathologic Etiologies of Late and Very Late Stent Thrombosis following First-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Placement

For Personal Use. Copyright HMP 2013

Title for Paragraph Format Slide

Inflammation, plaque progression and vulnerability: evidence from intravascular ultrasound imaging

Transcription:

Imaging Overview for Vulnerable Plaque: Data from IVUS Trial and An Introduction to VH-IVUS Imgaging Gary S. Mintz,, MD Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York, NY

Today, in reality, almost everything that we currently know about vulnerable plaque has come either from histopathology or from in vivo detection of plaque rupture or study of patients who present with acute coronary syndromes - NOT from prospective correlative studies or prospective identification of vulnerable plaques before they rupture, rapidly progress, or thrombose. To my knowledge, there are only three, retrospective IVUS studies relating lesion findings to late events and no trial data

Morphology of vulnerable coronary plaque: insights from follow-up of patients examined by IVUS before an acute coronary syndrome 114 coronary sites from 106 patients 16 pts had an acute event 1-241 months (21.8±6.4months) post index IVUS 12 pts had the event 4.0±3.4 months (range 1 to 8 months) at the same sites where preexisting atherosclerotic disease had been demonstrated by IVUS Sites related to acute events Sites not related to acute events Plaque burden 67±9% 57±12% <0.05 Shallow echolucent zones 8/12 4/90 <0.05 p (Yamagishi et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:106-11) 11)

Proximal 0 3mm 12mm EEM CSA = 21.0mm 2 Lumen CSA = 9.5mm 2 P+M CSA = 11.5mm 2 EEM CSA = 23.5mm 2 Lumen CSA = 5.5mm 2 P+M CSA = 18.0mm 2 EEM CSA = 13.7mm 2 Lumen CSA = 9.3mm 2 P+M CSA = 4.4mm 2

Clinical Follow up in 357 Intermediate Lesions in 300 Pts Deferred Intervention After IVUS Imaging IVUS MLD (mm) 4 3 2 Death/MI/TLR TLR DM no-dm 1 0 r=0.339 0 1 2 3 4 QCA MLD (mm) 2-3 3-4 4-5 5 IVUS MLA (mm 2 ) 2-3 3-4 4-5 5 IVUS MLA (mm 2 ) Death/MI/TLR @ (mean) 13 mos = 8% overall (2% death/mi and 6% TLR) Death/MI/TLR @ (mean) 13 mos = 4.4% in lesions with MLA >4.0mm 2 Only independent predictor of death/mi/tlr was IVUS MLA (p=0.0041) Independent predictors of TLR were DM (p=0.0493) and IVUS MLA (p=0.0042) Although the number of patients with death/mi was small (n=6), the t only independent predictor was IVUS MLD (p=0.0498) (Abizaid, et al. Circulation 1999;100:256-61) 61)

Relationship Between LM Plaque Progression and Non-LM Events % P&M/yr P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 *Death, MI, USA, or PCI or another lesion von Birgelen et al. Circulation 2004; 110:1579-85

LM Plaque Progression As a Predictor of Non-LM Cardiovascular Events 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-10 -20-30 -40 LM Plaque&Media/year (%) p<0.001 (vs. no events) 56 Individual Patients Myocardial infarction (n=5) Unstable angina (n=7) PCI of new de-novo lesion (n=6) No events (n=38) von Birgelen et al. Circulation 2004;110:1579-85

0 1mm 4mm

Three Vessel IVUS Imaging in 24 Pts with ACS and Positive Tn 50 ruptured plaques 9 culprit lesion 41 nonculprit lesion 19 pts had at least 1 nonculprit plaque rupture (79%) 17 pts had 1 plaque rupture in a second artery 3 pts had plaque ruptures in all 3 arteries % # of Ruptured Plaques Rioufol et al Circulation 2002;106:804-808 808

Location of 273 ruptured plaques in 158 patients with ACS and 48 patients with stable angina and three vessel IVUS # of arteries Length of artery imaged beginning at the coronary ostium (mm) # of ruptured plaques Distance from coronary ostium (mm) (Hong et al J Am Coll Card 2005;46:261-5) 5)

Symptoms in 254 patients with 300 plaque ruptures in 257 arteries # of ruptured plaques per patient with stable angina (n=113) 46% 11% 11% 32% The only independent predictor or a ruptured plaque in stable angina was diabetes mellitus (p=0.034, OR=2.553) (Maehara et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:904-10) (Hong et al Circulation 2004;110:928-33)

Comparison of Culprit & Non-Culprit Rupture Sites in ACS Patients and Rupture Sites in Non-ACS Patients ACS Culprit Plaque Ruptures (N=35) ACS Non-Culprit Plaque Ruptures (N=20) Non-ACS Plaque Ruptures (N=27) (mm 2 ) p=0.001 p=0.001 Independent predictors of ACS were MLA and thrombus (both p=0.01) Fuji et al. Circulation 2003;108:2473-8

0 2mm 6mm

Association of positive remodeling and ACS P=0.001 P=0.035 P=0.029 (Schoenhagen et al. Circulation 2000;101:598-603) (Prati et al. Circulation 2003;107:2320-5)

Calcium is less severe and more spotty in unstable lesions MI (n=61) Unstable angina (n=70) Stable angina (n=47) No calcification 26% 41% 21% Spotty calcification 51% 40% 30% Intermediate calcification 15% 16% 11% Extensive calcification 8% 3% 38% p<0.0001 (Ehara et al. Circulation 2004;110:3424-9)

IVUS profile of ruptured plaques: Insights into pre-rupture rupture morphology (n=112 culprit ruptured plaques) (Fujii et al. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:429-35)

Mean±1SD CoV 10 10 th Percentile 90 th Percentile Reference Lumen CSA 11.7±3.5 0.29 8.1 15.3 EEM CSA 20.2±5.6 0.27 14.2 26.7 P&M CSA 8.5±3.0 0.35 4.9 12.4 Plaque Burden 0.42±0.75 0.75 0.18 0.31 0.49 Lesion Lumen CSA 4.9±2.7 0.55 2.1 8.6 EEM CSA 20.8±6.0 0.29 14.3 28.5 P&M CSA 15.9±4.9 0.31 9.8 22.4 Min P&M Th 0.5±0.3 0.3 0.58 0.2 1.0 Max P&M Th 2.3±0.6 0.25 1.6 3.0 Eccentricity 0.32±0.23 0.23 0.71 0.09 0.66 Plaque Burden 0.76±0.10 0.10 0.12 0.63 0.88 AS 0.57±0.19 0.19 0.34 0.28 0.80 RI 1.10±0.20 0.20 0.18 0.87 1.38 Arc of Ca 46.9±51.2 1.09 0 106.7 While the sensitivity of these findings is high, the specificity is low.

Are all vulnerable plaques thin-cap fibroatheromas? 70% of ACS culprit lesions (Naghavi et al. Circulation 2003;108:1664-72)

In vivo comparison of OCT and angioscopy in assessing culprit lesions in 30 AMI patients Plaque rupture Incidence=73% Incidence=47% Incidence=40% Plaque Erosion Plaque erosion Incidence=23% Incidence=3% Incidence=0% (Kubo et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:933-9) 9)

Virtual Histology IVUS Only the envelope amplitude (echo intensity) is used in formation of the gray- scale IVUS image Eight amplitude and frequency parameters are used in Virtual Histology Frequency of echo signal can also vary, depending on the tissue

IVUS B scan Thin plate spline morphing after which the computer was taught to recognize four basic tissue types Movat pentachrome stain

In vitro Validation of VH Tissue Characterization VH IVUS vs Eagle Eye VH Accuracy vs histopathology from fresh post-mortem coronary arteries Sensitivity Specificity Predictive Accuracy Fibrous tissue (n=162) 84.0% 98.8% 92.8% Fibrofatty (n=84) 86.9% 95.1% 93.4% Necrotic core (n=69) 97.1% 93.8% 94.4% Dense calcium (n=92) 97.8% 99.7% 99.3% Nair et al Euro Intervention 2007;3:113-20

Development of Human Coronary Atherosclerosis Adaptive Intimal thickening Intimal xanthoma Pathologic intimal thickening Fibrous cap atheroma Thin-cap Fibroatheroma LP NC NC FC Smooth muscle cells Macrophage foam cells Extracellular lipid Cholesterol clefts Necrotic core Calcified plaque Hemorrhage Thrombus Healed thrombus Collagen FC = fibrous cap LP = lipid pool NC = necrotic core

Pathological intimal thickening (PIT) Thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) Thick-cap fibroatheroma (ThFA) Fibrotic Fibrocalcific

Morphometry of different plaque types Pathologic intimal thickening (PIT) (n=125) IEL mm 2 Plaque burden % Necrotic core % 6.5 43.0 0.1 Fibroatheroma 9.2 64.5 11.2 (n=262) TCFA (n=46) 12.8 67.0 21.6 Plaque rupture (n=55) 13.2 79.8 29.0 TCFA (n=64) Plaque Rupture (n=69) IEL Area mm 2 11.99 12.63 Plaque Area 8.74 10.35 Plaque burden % 69.2 75.1 % Necrotic core 24.3 32.2 % Calcification 8.95 5.77 % Macrophage 4.56 3.78 Mean cap thickness (μm) 39 35 PIT is the likely precursor lesion of fibroatheroma, but the mechanisms responsible for this conversion are poorly understand... Adapted from Virmani, TCT 2008l

Thin Cap Fibroatheroma (TCFA) Thin Cap Fibro-Atheroma (TCFA) or Vulnerable Plaque Confluent necrotic core >10% of total plaque and located at the lumen in 3 consecutive frames. Based on the presence or absence of Ca, the length of the NC, or signs of previous ruptures, TCFA can be further sub- classified for the purpose of risk assessment TICFA without significant narrowing - plaque burden <50% on IVUS and/or less than 25% narrowing on angiogram. (Pathologic data suggests that TCFA without significant plaque burden are less vulnerable ) <5% calcium >5% calcium multiple layers Still further sub-classification can be based on presence of luminal narrowing. Highest Risk TCFA a. Confluent NC>20% b. No evidence of fibrotic cap c. Calcium >5% d. Remodeling index >1.05 e. >50% plaque burden by IVUS (Pathologic data suggests that TCFA with significant plaque burden are the most vulnerable)

Healed ruptures are common in patients with acute events In 142 men with sudden cardiac death, the mechanism of death was presumed to be acute plaque rupture with acute thrombus in 44, acute plaque erosion with acute thrombus in 23, stable plaque with healed MI in 41, and stable plaque without MI in 34 There were 189 healed rupture sites. Healed ruptures were present in 75% of hearts with acute plaque rupture and 80% of hearts with stable plaque and healed MI Of the 44 acute rupture sites, 9 showed 1 healed previous rupture site, 9 showed 2 healed previous rupture sites, 9 showed 3 healed previous rupture sites, and 6 showed 4 healed previous rupture sites. Acute ruptures at sites of 3 3 healed previous ruptures demonstrated greater underlying plaque burden (94±4%) 4%) than those without healed previous rupture (74±12%). (Burke et al. Circulation 2001;103;934-40) 40)

Mean plaque burden increases with number of prior rupture sites Mean plaque burden 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 Mean plaque burden 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 Number of prior ruptures, healed rupture sites Number of prior ruptures, acute rupture sites 11% of plaque ruptures are virgin (Burke et al. Circulation 2001;103;934-40) 40)

Multiple small calcific deposits by greyscale IVUS, multiple necrotic cores by VH-IVUS

Greyscale IVUS findings are ubiquitous in diffuse/advanced coronary atherosclerosis and, therefore, of limited ability to predict events. VH-IVUS criteria were based on presumptive histologic evidence. But its ability to detect and assess the risk of a specific lesion will depend NOT on correlation with histopathology, but on the ability to predict future events. Perhaps PROSPECT will validate these assumptions. Perhaps not.

Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York, NY