CITY OF FORT PIERCE HOUSING REHABILATION PROJECT FOR 2802 AVENUE I BID NO ADDENDUM NO. 4

Similar documents
Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis (941) (941) SAMPLE REPORT

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Joseph T. Burkeson. Tuesday, November 19th, Total Professional Installation 1293 N. 60th St Tampa Fl, 33619

Certificate of Analysis

Certificate of Analysis

test address: P R E PAR E D F OR : CalPro Inspection Group Phone Number: (800)

C E R T I F I C A T E O F M O L D A N A L Y S I S

C e r t i f i c a t e o f m o l d A n a l y s i s

C e r t i f i c a te o f m o ld Ana l y s i s

Certificate of Analysis

Cer tif ica te of mold Anal y sis

CERTIFICATE OF MOLD ANALYSIS

CERTIFICATE OF MOLD ANALYSIS PRISTINE INSPECTIONS & TESTING PHONE NUMBER: [

PRO-TEC MOLD REPORT. Mold Evaluation

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Berman Inspection, LLC

A Healthy Home, LLC West Center Dr. Lakewood, CO

Analysis Report prepared for Quest Air

Mastertech North Jersey

Certificate of Mold Analysis

Analysis Report prepared for Mold-Spec

Certificate of Analysis

MOLD INSPECTION REPORT

Certificate of Analysis

Indiana University Environmental Health & Safety Beau Middaugh 2427 E. 2nd street Bloomington, IN USA (812)

Certificate of Analysis

FUNGAL (MOLD) TESTING RESULT REPORT* Cover Page

AIRBORNE FUNGAL STRUCTURE SAMPLE ANALYSIS Results reported as Structures per Cubic Meter of Air (structures/m 3 )

March 01, Re: Mold Sampling. Dear Mr. Jon Lewis,

MSES consultants, inc.

This test report contains the following four sections: Chain of Custody, Data Detail, Frequently Asked Questions, and Glossary.

Indiana University Environmental Health & Safety Beau Middaugh 2427 E. 2nd street Bloomington, IN USA (812)

Comments: Your Results

Air Sampling and Analysis for Mold in Hills Building UMass

Indoor Air Quality Testing. Horry County Schools

Indiana University Environmental Health & Safety Beau Middaugh 2427 E. 2nd street Bloomington, IN USA (812)

1251 Weatherstone Ct. Reston,VA Mold Reduction Report

MSES consultants, inc.

Legally Defensible Strategies for Mold Investigations

MSES consultants, inc.

Schneider Laboratories Global, Inc

Tape Lift and Swab Sampling of Items found at Glenwood Middle School Project #J15-876

This test report contains the following four sections: Chain of Custody, Data Detail, Frequently Asked Questions, and Glossary.

FUNGAL PARTICULATE AIR SAMPLING

Facts about Stachybotrys chartarum and Other Molds

Submitted By: test test Submittal Date: 2/2/2017 1:47:53 PM Sample Date: 2/1/2017 Lab Job No.: Page 1 1

EDLab. Re: 0 Any Street, # 100 Laboratory Analysis Report Work Authorization #

DATE: May 23, TO: Tommy Ellington, Executive Director

Literature Building Mold Sampling Report

Mold Technologies Mr. Dennis Ragain 3491 Wildwood Ct. NW Salem, OR USA

RE: Total Airborne Mould Spore Sampling Brookside Junior High 2239 Prospect Road, Hatchet Lake, NS

EMLab P&K MOLD REPORT Mr. Quality Control 1150 Bayhill Drive Suite 100 San Bruno, CA USA (650)

DATE: September 15, TO: Sarah Johnston, Director

M. A. CECIL & ASSOCIATES, INC Shannon Way, Port Republic, Maryland (301) INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

RLB CIH, LLC. Final Report Microbial Contamination Sampling Taos Recreation Center Taos, New Mexico. March 9, 2007

SUBJECT: Administration Building - IAQ - Initial Contact report - Room 217, Hallway outside Room 217, Room 201, Room 225, Room 212

INDOOR AIR QUALITY CLEARANCE SAMPLING

Environmental Assessment, Timothy Dwight Elementary School 1600 Redding Road, Fairfield, Connecticut

Protect your biggest investment. Live healthier. Because you re not only buying a home, you're also buying the air in it.

WHAT DOES MOLD MEAN? J&M Environmental Control Group 14 Monarch Bay Plaza, #470 Monarch Beach, CA 92629

Schneider Laboratories Global, Inc

Introduction: PCR Air Sampling: November 12, Carrie E Tompkins Elementary School PCR Fungi Study:

EMLab P&K MOLD REPORT Mr. Quality Control 1150 Bayhill Drive Suite 100 San Bruno, CA USA (650)

AIRBORNE MOLD SPORE ANALYSIS

SanAir Technologies Laboratory. Analysis Report. Hudson Valley Property Inspections, LLC

EXPANDED FUNGAL REPORT

January 31, Mr. Mark LaFleur Director of Plant Operations Town of Needham 1330 Highland Avenue Needham, MA 02492

DATE: September 12, TO: Curtis Martin, Principal. SUBJECT: Tom Hicks ES - IAQ - Air Test Results - Nurses' Office, Main Admin Office

Dealing With Dampness in Buildings

Mycotech Biological, Inc.

MYCOLOGY REPORT. Report: / 3503 Wgaon Wheel, Wichita Falls, TX

Occupational Health & Safety, Environmental Consultants Tel. (508) Tel. (800) Fax (508)

AladdinEnvironmentalLLC

MOLD SCREEN CHECK SAMPLE LAB REPORT

Schneider Laboratories Global, Inc

Analysis Report prepared for. Better Air

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALAYISIS ASSOCIATES, INC. BIOAEROSOL ANALYSIS METHOD GUIDE #2 January, Daniel M. Baxter

Mould Allergy. Patient Information

Asbestos Containing Materials Assessment 294 Earle Drive Greenville, South Carolina

DATE: February 14, TO: Amy Acosta, Principal

DATE: April 21, TO: Lisa Moore, Executive Director

February 3, Thank you again for the opportunity to assist you with this project. Should you have any. Sincerely,

Airborne Mould Sampling Moncton High School 207 Church Street Moncton, NB E1C 5A3. November 01, 2013

Transcription:

March 10, 2015 CITY OF FORT PIERCE HOUSING REHABILATION PROJECT FOR 2802 AVENUE I BID NO. 2015-022 ADDENDUM NO. 4 The purpose of this addendum is to extend the bid due date from 3:00PM, Tuesday, March 17, 2015 to: 3:00 PM, THURSDAY, MARCH 26, 2015 and to include the Mold Inspection Testing Report. All other conditions of this bid remain the same. Please acknowledge receipt of this addendum and include it with your submittal. Signature: Signature: Manual Typed or Printed Company Name: Address: Date: /gc Attachment: Mold Inspection Testing Report Addendum No. 5 ~ Bid No. 2015-022

PRIME Engineering & Environmental Building Services EngineeringEnvironmental.com 2801 Ocean Drive, Suite 101, Vero Beach, FL 32963 (772) 410-3752 February, 2015 To: City of Fort Pierce Fort Pierce Redevelopment Re: 2802 Ave. I, Ft. Pierce, FL 34950 - Mold inspection and testing At the request of Fort Pierce Redevelopment, I inspected the subject property relative to mold and related issues on February 20 th and collected three bio-air samples; two from the inside the house and one from the exterior. The air samples were collected using Air-O-Cell cartridges with calibrated biopumps at 15 liters of air per minute for 10 minutes. (150 liter sample) This type of testing captures fungal spores and can indicate sporulation and spore concentrations, along with the types of mold present. The cartridges were sent to a certified laboratory for fungal spore analysis accompanied by a signed chain of custody form. The complete laboratory report is attached to this document. The findings and recommendations from the inspection and air testing are provide below. Visual assessment: 1. A new roof is needed. The existing roof is not appropriate nor does it comply with residential building code requirements. A proper and water tight roof is imperative to keep moisture out of the structure and to prevent the growth and spread of mold. 2. Several sections of the ceilings inside the house need to be replaced. Some are water stained or damaged, and some have fallen down leaving the attic visible. This allow dirty, hot, and humid air to flow into the living space and will contribute to the growth and spread of mold. The ceilings must be repaired to provide separation of the living spaces from the attic. Page 1 of 4

3. Inside the house on and adjacent to the water stained and damaged ceiling areas, there is evidence of mold growth in several locations. All such areas of the ceiling drywall need to be removed and replaced with new material. Removal or remediation of water damaged material and mold should be conducted by a licensed Florida mold remediator in accordance with ANSI/IICRC S300, S500, and S520. 4. The air filter inside the air hander needs to be replaced and we recommend the cooling coil for professional cleaning by a licensed heating and cooling contractor after items 1-3 above are completed. 5. The inside of the house has many stored items and organic materials that can more readily allow mold to grow and spread. I recommend thorough cleaning of all interior surfaces and finishes along with cleaning of personal and stored items. Laboratory test results: 1. The indoor air samples show the fungal ecology (concentration & types of mold present) within the living space is acceptable. However, the conditions noted above need swift action to prevent mold from becoming a larger problem for the indoor environment other than the couple locations of visible mold growth noted above. Moisture assessment: Moisture analysis was conducted in limited areas inside the property using an Infrared (IR) camera and a SurveyMaster moisture meter. The moisture measurements should not be interpreted as exact moisture content measurements of a material but should be interpreted as the relative moisture reading of the material at the time of measurement. PRIME Engineering & Environmental Building Services uses the following benchmarks* for the percent (%) Wood Moisture Equivalency as an interpretive guide to the conditions measured in the building materials tested. > 20.0% Relative moisture present in the material tested that provides favorable conditions for microbial growth Page 2 of 4

15.0-20.0% Caution - relative moisture present (other factors such as humidity, water damage must be assessed for interpretation of the material tested) < 15.0% Recommended levels to prevent the opportunity for microbial growth No active moisture was detected (readings > 15%) at the time of our visit. Photo Gallery: Notes and Limitations: The observations made in this report are based on a non-invasive assessment of the indoor space at the time of our visit. Hidden areas of mold growth may exist and areas of damage not related to the issue/claim may also exist. We attempt to identify moisture leaks and the presence of moisture, but we do not guarantee locating or finding any moisture activity or leaks due to many factors. Specialized testing or destructive analysis and removal of wall or floor finishes may also be appropriate, but such is not included with our service. Page 3 of 4

Variability with outdoor samples over short time spans and changing weather conditions can occur, which may result in a lack of confidence in the data when comparing outdoor to indoor samples. When necessary, PRIME Engineering & Environmental Building Services utilizes a national accredited laboratory database of typical outdoor fungal concentrations to compare indoor to outdoor samples as an aid in interpreting conditions along with the other important aspects of an assessment, including but not limited to visual observations and moisture mapping. Indoor environmental quality is an individual responsibility, awareness and action improves the indoor environment significantly. It is recommended to have your indoor environment evaluated periodically to reduce potential for problems in the future. Sincerely, Gregory J. Bertaux, PE, CIEC Owner, PRIME Engineering & Environmental Building Services State Licensed Professional Engineer #66843 State Licensed Mold Assessor #MRSA102 State Licensed Mold Remediator #MRSR2360 State Licensed Home Inspector #HI366 Nationally Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant #1101011 Page 4 of 4

PRIME ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL 475 19TH PL VERO BEACH, FL 32960 Certificate of Mold Analysis Prepared for: PRIME ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL Phone Number: (772) 410-3752 Fax Number: Project Name: 2802 AV. I Test Location: 2802 AVE. I FORT PIERCE, FL 34957 Chain of Custody #: 825922 Received Date: February 23, 2015 Report Date: February 24, 2015 Erika Piechowski, Technical Manager Carlos Ochoa, Quality Control Manager Currently there are no Federal regulations for evaluating potential health effects of fungal contamination and remediation. This information is subject to change as more information regarding fungal contaminants becomes available. For more information visit http://www.epa.gov/mold or www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/epi/mold.shtml. This document was designed to follow currently known industry guidelines for the interpretation of microbial sampling, analysis, and remediation. Since interpretation of mold analysis reports is a scientific work in progress, it may as such be changed at any time without notice. The client is solely responsible for the use or interpretation. PRO-LAB/SSPTM Inc. makes no express or implied warranties as to health of a property from only the samples sent to their laboratory for analysis. The Client is hereby notified that due to the subjective nature of fungal analysis and the mold growth process, laboratory samples can and do change over time relative to the originally sampled material. PRO-LAB/SSPTM Inc. reserves the right to properly dispose of all samples after the testing of such samples are sufficiently completed or after a 7 day period, whichever is greater. For more information please contact PRO-LAB at (954) 384-4446 or email info@prolabinc.com Page 1 of 5

0 Prepared for : PRIME ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL Test Address : 2802 AV. I 2802 AVE. I FORT PIERCE, FL 34957 ANALYSIS METHOD Spore trap analysis Spore trap analysis Spore trap analysis INTENTIONALLY BLANK LOCATION EXTERIOR CENTER LIV. RM MAST. BD RM COC / LINE # 825922-1 825922-2 825922-3 SAMPLE TYPE & VOLUME AIR-O-CELL - 150L AIR-O-CELL - 150L AIR-O-CELL - 150L SERIAL NUMBER 21051440 21115537 210514 COLLECTION DATE Feb 20, 2015 Feb 20, 2015 Feb 20, 2015 ANALYSIS DATE Feb 24, 2015 Feb 24, 2015 Feb 24, 2015 CONCLUSION CONTROL NOT ELEVATED NOT ELEVATED IDENTIFICATION Raw Count Spores per m 3 Percent of Total Raw Count Spores per m 3 Percent of Total Raw Count Spores per m 3 Cladosporium 24 160 40 8 53 50 Curvularia 8 53 28 Other Ascospores 12 80 20 Other Basidiospores 4 7 Penicillium/Aspergillus 12 80 20 12 80 43 8 53 50 Rusts 4 7 8 53 28 Unidentified Spores 4 7 TOTAL SPORES 60 401 100 28 186 100 16 106 100 MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT * 1 1 1 BACKGROUND DEBRIS Light Light Light Cellulose Fiber 12 80 12 80 Insect Fragments 8 53 4 Plant Fragments 4 Pollen 4 OBSERVATIONS & COMMENTS Background debris qualitatively estimates the amount of particles that are not pollen or spores and directly affects the accuracy of the spore counts. The categories of Light, Moderate, Heavy and Too Heavy for Accurate Count, are used to indicate the amount of deposited debris. Increasing amounts of debris will obscure small spores and can prevent spores from impacting onto the slide. The actual number of spores present in the sample is likely higher than reported if the debris estimate is Heavy or Too Heavy for Accurate Count. All calculations are rounded to two significant figures and therefore, the total percentage of spore numbers may not equal 100%. * Minimum Detection Limit. Based on the volume of air sampled, this is the lowest number of spores that can be detected and is an estimate of the lowest concentration of spores that can be read in the sample. NA = Not Applicable. Percent of Total Spores that were observed from the samples submitted are listed on this report. If a spore is not listed on this report it was not observed in the samples submitted. Interpretation Guidelines: A determination is added to the report to help users interpret the mold analysis results. A mold report is only one aspect of an indoor air quality investigation. The most important aspect of mold growth in a living space is the availability of water. Without a source of water, mold generally will not become a problem in buildings. These determinations are in no way meant to imply any health outcomes or financial decisions based solely on this report. For questions relating to medical conditions you should consult an occupational or environmental health physician or professional. CONTROL is a baseline sample showing what the spore count and diversity is at the time of sampling. The control sample(s) is usually collected outside of the structure being tested and used to determine if this sample(s) is similar in diversity and abundance to the inside sample(s). ELEVATED means that the amount and/or diversity of spores, as compared to the control sample(s), and other samples in our database, are higher than expected. This can indicate that fungi have grown because of a water leak or water intrusion. Fungi that are considered to be indicators of water damage include, but are not limited to: Chaetomium, Fusarium, Memnoniella, Stachybotrys, Scopulariopsis, Ulocladium. NOT ELEVATED means that the amount and/or the diversity of spores, as compared to the control sample and other samples in our database, are lower than expected and may indicate no problematic fungal growth. UNUSUAL means that the presence of current or former growth was observed in the analyzed sample. An abundance of spores are present, and/or growth structures including hyphae and/or fruiting bodies are present and associated with one or more of the types of mold/fungi identified in the analyzed sample. NORMAL means that no presence of current or former growth was observed in the analyzed sample. If spores are recorded they are normally what is in the air and have settled on the surface(s) tested. Raw Count Spores per m 3 Percent of Total Page 2 of 5

Chain of Custody # 825922 Liv. Rm Exterior Center Unidentified Spores Rus ts 53 Penic illium /As pergillus 80 80 Other Basidiospores Other Ascospores 80 Curv ularia 53 Clados porium 160 1 10 100 1000 Spores per cubic meter Page 3 of 5

Chain of Custody # 825922 Mast. Bd Rm Exterior Center Unidentified Spores Rus ts Penic illium /As pergillus 53 80 Other Basidiospores Other Ascospores 80 Clados porium 53 160 1 10 100 1000 Spores per cubic meter Page 4 of 5

Identification Outdoor Habitat Indoor Habitat Possible Allergic Potential Not an opinion or interpretation Cladosporium The most common spore type Commonly found on wood and Type I (hay fever and asthma), reported in the air worldwide. wallboard. Commonly grows on Type III (hypersensitivity Found on dead and dying plant window sills, textiles and foods. pneumonitis) allergies. litter, and soil. Curvularia Ascospores Basidiospores Penicillium/Aspergillus Rusts Unidentified Spores Commonly found everywhere on soil and plant debris. Common everywhere. Constitutes a large part of the airspora outside. Can reach very high numbers in the air outside during the spring and summer. Can increase in numbers during and after rainfalls. Commonly found everywhere, especially in the late summer and fall. These spores are from Mushrooms. Common everywhere. Normally found in the air in small amounts in outdoor air. Grows on nearly everything. Common everywhere growing on grasses, trees and other living plants. Common everywhere. Grow on decaying plant litter and other plant-derived material. Capable of growing on many cellulytic substrates like wallboard and wood. Very few of this group grow inside. The notable exception is Chaetomium, Ascotricha and Peziza. Mushrooms are not normally found growing indoors, but can grow on wet lumber, especially in crawlspaces. Sometimes mushrooms can be seen growing in flower pots indoors. Wetted wallboard, wood, food, leather, etc. Able to grow on many substrates indoors. Does not grow indoors. Wetted cellulosic material. Type I (hay fever and asthma) and common cause of allergenic sinusitis. Little known for most of this group of fungi. Dependent on the type (see Chaetomium and Ascotricha). Some allergenicity reported. Type I (hay fever, asthma) and Type III (hypersensitivity pneumonitis). Type I (hay fever and asthma) allergies and Type III (hypersensitivity pneumonitis) allergies. Type I (hay fever and asthma) allergies. None known. Comments A very common and important allergen source both outdoors and indoors. Among the group of Mushrooms (Basidiomycetes) are dry rot fungi Serpula and Poria that are particularly destructive to buildings. This is a combination group of Penicillium and Aspergillus and is used when only the spores are seen. The spores are so similar that they cannot be reliably separated into their respective genera. Rust requires a living plant host to complete part of its lifecycle and thus, is not normally found growing indoors except perhaps on an infected house plant. This group of spores is reserved for spores whose identity is unknown. These kinds of spores have usually never been seen before in spore traps by our laboratory and/or are of such morphology that they cannot be identified with any degree of certainty to a particular genus. Page 5 of 5