Institute of Agric ulture and Natural Resourc es Department of Plant Pathology

Similar documents
Institute of Agric ulture and Natural Resourc es Department of Plant Pathology

Funding for this research was provided by the Nebraska Soybean Board.

Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2009

ABSTRACT: 67 SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE RESISTANCE HOW IT ALL COMES TOGETHER IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES

Agronomy Notes Vol 30, No EARLY MATURING VARIETIES AND SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODES: WILL THIS MARRIAGE WORK?

Improving Management Of Soybean Cyst Nematode Through Extension Demonstration And Outreach

Loren Giesler, Nebraska Extension Plant Pathologist John Wilson, Nebraska Extension Educator Burt Co. Sclerotinia stem rot (White Mold)

A 2015 multi-site field study on the effects of seed treatment on soybean yield and Soybean Cyst Nematode reproduction

2017 ILeVO Trial Harvest Report

Institute of Ag Professionals

Institute of Ag Professionals

SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE MANAGEMENT ADVANCED CROP ADVISORS

Soybean Cyst Nematode and other disease issues in soybean. Sam Markell, Ph.D. Extension Plant Pathologist North Dakota State University

SOIL PH IN RELATION TO BROWN STEM ROT AND SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE N.C. Kurtzweil 1, C.R. Grau 2, A.E. MacGuidwin 3, J.M. Gaska 4, and A.W.

Brian Diers University of Illinois

Breeding for SCN Resistance in the South

Soybean Cyst Nematode: a Continually Growing Problem in Soybeans?

2011 Early Season Foliar Fungicide Timing Trial on Corn

2017 Meetings. ILeVO

5/23 6/26 6/30 7/21 CONCLUSIONS

2006- Foliar insecticide effects on soybean aphid and soybean yield. Summary Background Objective Site and application description

Managing Soybean Cyst Nematode

2017 Michigan Regional Trial

Managing Soybean Cyst Nematode with the Soil Test and Crop Rotation

MANAGING MARESTAIL AND GIANT RAGWEED IN WHEAT

RESPONSE OF DEKALB CORN PRODUCTS TO POPULATION

The soybean cyst nematode (SCN), Heterodera glycines, is the number one yield reducer for

In mid-october, all plots were again soil sampled to determine residual nutrients.

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2011

Cultivar Specific Nitrogen Management Profiles For Irrigated Process Varieties Inkster, ND 2009

Balance GT/Balance Bean/LL Systems in Soybeans at Rochester, MN Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Annette Kyllo and Matthew Bauer

2007 Powdery Mildew of Cantaloupe Fungicide Trial

DORIAN GATCHELL JANUARY 5, 2016 GRANITE FALLS, MN JANUARY 6, WATERTOWN, SD JANUARY 7, GRAND FORKS, ND

Residual herbicides in Liberty Link soybeans at Rosemount, MN Treatment Date May 23 June 17 June 23 July 10

Soybean seed quality response among maturity groups to planting dates in the Midsouth. Larry C. Purcell & Montserrat Salmeron

2016 Processing Onion Weed Control Trial

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum

NEW YORK and VERMONT CORN SILAGE HYBRID TRIALS 2017

INFLUENCE OF DAIRY MANURE APPLICATIONS ON CORN NUTRIENT UPTAKE

2018 Nebraska Dry Bean Variety Trials

Peanut Disease Control Field Trials 2015

2016 Soybean Update. A) Variety options for 2016

Foliar fungicide effects on soybean disease suppression, senescence and yield I.

Crop Disease Management Row Crop Short Course March 1 st, 2018

May 2008 AG/Soils/ pr Understanding Your Soil Test Report Grant E. Cardon Jan Kotuby-Amacher Pam Hole Rich Koenig General Information

Management of Corky Ringspot Disease in Potato Using Vydate C-LV Irrigated Trial Rice, MN 2009

An IPM 1 Approach to Managing Herbicide Resistant Ryegrass in Northeast Texas. October, 2014 J. Swart, A. Braley, R. Sutton, S. Stewart, D.

Objectives: 1. Determine the effect of nitrogen and potassium applications on sugar beet root yield and quality.

Understanding a Soil Report

Research. Plant Health Progress :

Fusarium root rot of soybean occurrence, impact, and relationship with soybean cyst nematode

ORGANIC ROMAINE HEARTS LATE SUMMER 2017 SALINAS, CA

INSECTICIDE EFFICACY TRIAL FOR THRIPS CONTROL IN DRY BULB ONIONS

Wheat Update September 2017 ARKANSAS WHEAT PERFORMANCE TRIALS AND VARIETY SELECTION. Methods

Response of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Levels on Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Peanut Disease Control Field Trials 2013

General Combining Ability of Sugar Beet Inbreds as Determined with Two Different Top Cross Testers

Corn and soybean yield responses to micronutrients fertilization

Weather conditions prior to POST I, II & III applications were favorable due to abundant moisture conditions and moderate temperatures.

Using silicon, Stimplex and plant resistance in pumpkin production systems to reduce plant disease loss

Quality and yield of Indian mustard genotypes as influenced by different fertility levels

Ground-truthing The Soil Residual Herbicide Bioassay

Managing transplant size and advancing field maturity of fresh tomatoes and peppers

Final 2013 Delaware Soybean Board Report

MANAGING GIANT RAGWEED & MARESTAIL IN WHEAT

2008 PMR REPORT #ESOYSMI4 SECTION E: CEREAL, FORAGE CROPS, and OILSEEDS Insect Pests

THE IMPACT OF NITROGEN AND SILICON NUTRITION ON THE RESISTANCE OF SUGARCANE VARIETIES TO ELDANA SACCHARINA (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE)

Research Abstract for the CALIFORNIA LEAFY GREENS RESEARCH PROGRAM April 1, 2012 March 31, 2013

Influence of Stabilized Urea Nitrogen on Turfgrass Performance and Nitrogen Volatilization Bill Kreuser, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln

USE OF OCEANGROWN PRODUCTS TO INCREASE CROP YIELD AND ESSENTIAL NUTRIENT CONTENT. Dave Franzen, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

In-depth studies initiated: Results:

Pest Management in Organic Soybeans-Paul Hunter and Wayne Wangness Farms-2002

The 1 th International and The 4 th National Congress on Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture April 2012 in Isfahan, Iran

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SDS AND SCN IN COMMERCIAL SOYBEAN FIELDS IN WISCONSIN 1. Introduction

M. S. ZUBER A. J. KEASTER N. G. WEIR C. F. STARK P. J. LOESCH, JR. January,1970

Methods and Materials:

What s new with micronutrients in our part of the world?

Heterodera glycines. A Threat to Dry Bean production. Berlin Nelson Jr., Professor, North Dakota State Univ., Plant Pathology

Shift in Virulence of Soybean Cyst Nematode is Associated with Use of Resistance from PI 88788

AUTHORS MWANSA MUKUKA DR. CHISHALA BENSON H. DR. MUTITI SAMUEL DR. UCHIDA YOSHITAKA APPSA CONFERENCE 6 TH NOVEMBER, 2017

Nitrogen additives: What is what, and do they work?

Effect of Soybean Cyst Nematode on Fatty Acid Levels of Soybean Seed

Evaluation of Assail for the Control of Early Season Cotton Aphids in Upland Cotton COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT 2001

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

INFLUENCE OF PLANT PARTS ON IN VITRO DRY MATTER DISAPPEARANCE OF FORAGE SORGHUM SILAGES. J. White and K.K. Bolsen

5. Plant Physiology/Chemistry Section

Project Title: Evaluating the Distribution and Potential Impacts of Soybean Vein Necrosis Virus in Delaware

EffectivenessofDifferentSpayTimingMethodsfortheControlofLepidopteronPestsinCotton

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

Aphid Management on Head Lettuce Using Imidacloprid and Foliar Insecticides

Impact of High Glucosinolate Mustard Biomass and Meal on Black Bean Yield

Tidewater Ag. Res. & Ext. Ctr.

OBJECTIVES METHODS. Site Characteristics

THE RIGHT SEEDS. THE RIGHT PROTECTION.

PLANT-DRIVEN IRRIGATION FROM THE GROUND UP.

WATERMELON RESPONSE TO COPPER AND A COMPLETE MICRONUTRIENT SOURCE1

Tina Brandt, Nora Olsen, Jeff Stark, Rich Novy, Jonathan Whitworth, and Sanjay Gupta. Storage Management of. Alpine Russet.

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Dead Nettle (Lamium maculatum Shell Pink )

Transcription:

2014 Evaluation of SCN Resistant Soybean Varieties in Nebraska Loren J. Giesler, Extension Plant Pathologist Nicholas Arneson, Extension Technologist John Wilson, Extension Educator Burt County Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) is the pest that causes the single largest loss to soybean producers in both Nebraska and the U.S. each year. Chemical treatment to the soil and/or soybean seed to control SCN has not achieved consistent economic success. Resistant varieties are the most effective way to maintain high yields in SCN-infested soybean fields. This report summarizes soybean variety testing from three SCN-infested locations in Nebraska. All of the soybean varieties in these tests were resistant to SCN with the exception of four susceptible "standards." The majority of varieties have the PI 88788 source of SCN resistance. However, additional varieties with Cyst-X or Peking resistance were also included in the trials. The three locations used for testing were all on producers' fields located throughout Nebraska. Sites near the towns of Battle Creek, Columbus and Plattsmouth were selected based on geographical location in the state and adequately high populations of SCN (Figure 1). A non-infested control site was also planted near Mead at the Agricultural Research and Development Center (ARDC) to test SCN resistant soybean variety yields in the absence of SCN. All entries in the trial were replicated 4 times at each location. Each individual plot was 4 rows (10 feet) wide by 17 feet long. The spacing between rows was 30 in. Soil samples were collected from each plot in the spring shortly after soybean emergence. These samples were then processed in the lab to determine the number of SCN eggs per 100 cc s soil. These spring samples established the initial SCN count for each plot. Soil sampling was repeated in the fall following harvest to determine the final SCN population density. By comparing the final (fall) SCN population to the initial (spring) population a Reproduction Factor (Rf) was calculated. The Rf is calculated by dividing the final SCN count (plus minimum detectable level) by the initial SCN count (plus minimum detectable level).this number will indicate how much the population increased or decreased during the growing season. An Rf of 1.0 means there was no change in the SCN population. Any RF value above 1 indicates the population increased, and any value below 1 means it decreased. The graphs below, which report soybean yield (bu/a) and SCN reproduction (Rf), indicate SCN reproduction in terms of the Rf. Battle Creek The Battle Creek site was located in a center pivot irrigated field with loamy sand soils. The soil ph was 7.0 (Table 1). Soil organic matter (OM) was 1.1 % (Table 1). Rainfall totaled 21.9 inches and approximately 5.0 inches of irrigation were applied throughout the growing season. Battle Creek had the lowest initial SCN population with an average of 1,077 eggs per 100 cc s soil (Table 1). SCN varieties

with PI 88788 resistance were not very effective, allowing an average Rf of 3.6. Varieties with Peking resistance had a Rf of 1.4 and Cyst-X had an Rf of 5.9. Hoegemeyer 2993NRR with PI 88788 resistance exhibited the best control with an Rf of 0.7. The average Rf for susceptible varieties was 10.4. Yields were fair with the highest yield being Channel 2808R2 with 63.4 bu/a. The lowest yielding variety was Asgrow 2431 an SCN susceptible variety with 47.5 bu/a. The average yield for this location was 55.7 bu/a. The 5 top yielding varieties in descending order were Channel 2808R2 [63.4 bu/a], Stine 29RE22 [62.5 bu/a], NK 35 A8 [62.1 bu/a], LG C3070R2 [61.9 bu/a], and Latham L2884R2 [61.9 bu/a]. There was statistical variance exhibited between yields producing an LSD (P = 0.10) of 7.8. Columbus The Columbus site was located in a center pivot irrigated field with loamy sand soils. The soil ph was 7.4 (Table 1). Soil organic matter (OM) was 3.0 % (Table 1). Rainfall totaled 27.5 inches throughout the growing season. Columbus had an intermediate initial SCN population with an average of 3,359 eggs per 100 cc s soil (Table 1). SCN varieties with PI 88788 resistance were effective, only allowing an average Rf of 0.9. Varieties with Peking resistance had an Rf of 1.2 and Cyst-X had an Rf of 0.5. Latham L3184R2 with PI 88788 resistances was the variety that exhibited the best control with an Rf of 0.3. Average Rf for susceptible varieties was 4.2. Yields were lower at this location with the highest being Mycogen 5N284R2 with 48.6 bu/a. The lowest yielding variety was LG 2916R2 a SCN resistant variety with Cyst-X resistance which yielded 30.0 bu/a. The average yield for this location was 41.0 bu/a. The 5 top yielding varieties in descending order were Mycogen 5N284R2 [49.5 bu/a], Stine 30RE02 [49.1 bu/a], Mycogen 5N275R2 [47.6 bu/a], LG C2605 [47.2 bu/a], and Producers 2408NR2 [47.1 bu/a]. There was statistical variance exhibited between yields producing an LSD (P = 0.10) of 9.9. Plattsmouth The Plattsmouth site was located in a non-irrigated field with silty clay loam soils. The soil ph was 7.3 (Table 1). Soil organic matter (OM) was 3.1 % (Table 1). Rainfall totaled 28.2 inches throughout the growing season. Plattsmouth had the highest initial SCN population with an average of 6,003 eggs/100 cc s soil (Table 1). SCN varieties with PI 88788 resistance were effective, allowing an average Rf of 0.8. Varieties with Peking resistance had an Rf of 0.5 and Cyst-X had an Rf of 0.5. Latham L3184R2 with PI 88788 resistance exhibited the best control with an Rf of 0.4. Average Rf for susceptible varieties was 3.6. Yields were fair with the highest being NK 34 Z1 with 69.6 bu/a. The lowest yielding variety was Producers 2408R2 an SCN susceptible variety which yielded 28.5 bu/a. The average yield for this location was 51.0 bu/a. The 5 top yielding varieties in descending order were NK 34 Z1 [69.6 bu/a], Latham L2948R2 [61.3 bu/a], NK 35 A8 [57.9 bu/a], Latham L3184R2 [57.7 bu/a] and Stine 29RD22 [57.1 bu/a]. There was statistical variance exhibited between yields producing an LSD (P = 0.10) of 17.4.

Statistics A statistical analysis was performed on the yield (bu/a) at each location. LSD's were calculated at the 90% confidence level. An LSD (Least Significant Difference) indicates how much difference there has to be between two entries before they are considered statistically different from each other and not due to natural variations in the test data. The 90% confidence level means there is a 90% probability the difference between two yields or reproductive factors is significant and only a 10% chance the difference was due to random variability. Lower confidence levels will result in smaller differences required for significance, while higher confidence levels will make the LSDs larger. The LSDs in the charts below are intended to help visualize differences between varieties. Table 1: Miscellaneous trial information. Location Soil Texture mph OM¹ (%) Average Spring SCN Population All Plots (eggs/100 cc s soil) HG Type² Planting Date Harvest Date Battle Creek Loamy Sand 7.0 1.1 1,077 1.3.6.7 5/23/2014 10/27/2014 Columbus Loamy Sand 6.8 1.1 3,359 2.5.7 5/30/2014 10/29/2014 Plattsmouth Silty Clay Loam 7.0 7.7 6,003 0 5/21/2014 10/21/2014 ¹OM = Organic Matter (%) ²See explanation of HG Type in Table 2

Table 2: HG Types and sources of resistance. (ie, if SCN is HG type 1 then it will reproduce on soybeans with Peking resistance, if SCN is HG type 1.2 then it will reproduce on soybeans with Peking or PI 88788 resistance. If a number is not listed in the HG type, that source of resistance held SCN reproduction to 10% or less of the reproduction that occurred on a standard susceptible variety.) HG Type Source of Resistance 1 PI 548402 (Peking) 2 PI 88788 3 PI 90763 4 PI 437654 5 PI 209332 6 PI 89772 7 PI 5484316 (Cloud)

Table 3: Average SCN population for resistant and susceptible varieties. Average Spring SCN Population¹ Average Fall SCN Population¹ Average Spring SCN Population¹ Average Fall SCN Population¹ Location Resistant Varieties Susceptible Varieties Battle Creek 991 1,609 1,600 3,970 Columbus 3,390 2,365 2,457 8,793 Plattsmouth 6,344 4,051 4,590 11,129 ¹ SCN Population = eggs/100 cc s soil Figure 1. Locations of UNL SCN-resistant Soybean Variety Trial Program experiments in 2014.

Battle Creek, NE SCN Plot Results Channel 2808R2 Stine 29RE22 NK 35 A8 LG C3070R2 Latham L2884R2 Channel 3106R2 Mycogen 5N275R2 Channel 3008R2 Asgrow 3432 NK 32 L8 Hoegemeyer 3004NRR NK 34 Z1 Producers 2900NR2 NK 27 J7 Stine 29RD22 NK 29 V2 Latham L3248R2 Hoegemeyer 2993NRR Latham L2948R2 Stine 30RE02 Hoegemeyer 3303NRR Mycogen 5N284R2 Asgrow 2433 NK 34 N3 Asgrow 3231 LG 2916R2 Asgrow 2931 Stine 28RE20 Asgrow 2733 LG C3245R2 Latham L3184R2 Producers 2500NR2 Hoegemeyer 2511NRR Latham E2920R2X Producers 2408NR2 NK S28 K1 LG C2605 Asgrow 2431 PI 88788 Peking Cyst-X Susceptible 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 40 45 50 55 60 65 SCN Reproduction (RF) LSD = 7.5 (90% confidence) Yield (bu/a) LSD = 7.8 (90% confidence) -Average Initial SCN population 1,077 eggs per 100 cc soil with HG Type 1.3.6.7 -RF = 1.0 = no change in SCN population density over growing season

Columbus, NE SCN Plot Results Mycogen 5N284R2 Stine 30RE02 Mycogen 5N275R2 LG C3245R2 Producers 2500NR2 Asgrow 2733 Asgrow 2433 NK 34 Z1 Channel 3008R2 NK 27 J7 Stine 28RE20 NK 35 A8 Hoegemeyer 3303NRR Latham L3248R2 Channel 2808R2 LG C3070R2 Latham L3184R2 Producers 2900NR2 Latham L2884R2 Asgrow 2931 NK 29 V2 Stine 29RD22 NK 32 L8 Hoegemeyer 3004NRR Latham L2948R2 Channel 3106R2 Stine 29RE22 NK 34 N3 Asgrow 3231 Hoegemeyer 2993NRR Asgrow 3432 LG 2916R2 Hoegemeyer 2511NRR Latham E2920R2X LG C2605 Producers 2408NR2 NK S28 K1 Asgrow 2431 PI 88788 Peking Cyst-X Susceptible 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 30 35 40 45 50 55 SCN Reproduction (RF) LSD = 1.4 (90% confidence) Yield (bu/a) LSD = 9.9 (90% confidence) -Average Initial SCN population 3,359 eggs per 100 cc soil with HG type 2.5.7 -RF = 1.0 = no change in SCN population density over growing season

Plattsmouth, NE SCN Plot Results NK 34 Z1 Latham L2948R2 NK 35 A8 Latham L3184R2 Stine 29RD22 NK 32 L8 LG C3245R2 Mycogen 5N275R2 LG 2916R2 Hoegemeyer 3303NRR Hoegemeyer 2993NRR Channel 3008R2 LG C3070R2 Hoegemeyer 3004NRR NK 34 N3 Producers 2900NR2 Stine 29RE22 Channel 3106R2 Latham L2884R2 Latham L3248R2 Asgrow 3432 NK 29 V2 Stine 30RE02 Stine 28RE20 Asgrow 3231 Asgrow 2931 Asgrow 2733 Channel 2808R2 NK 27 J7 Mycogen 5N284R2 Producers 2500NR2 Asgrow 2433 Hoegemeyer 2511NRR Latham E2920R2X LG C2605 Asgrow 2431 NK S28 K1 Producers 2408NR2 PI 88788 Peking Cyst-X Susceptible 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SCN Reproduction (RF) LSD = 1.7 (90% confidence) Yield (bu/a) LSD = 17.4 (90% confidence) -Average Initial SCN population 6,003 eggs per 100 cc soil with HG type 0 -RF = 1.0 = no change in SCN population density over growing season

Mead, NE Non-Infested SCN Plots Stine 29RE22 LG C3245R2 LG C3070R2 Latham L3184R2 Channel 2808R2 Asgrow 2733 Stine 29RD22 NK 35 A8 Producers 2500NR2 Stine 28RE20 Latham L2884R2 LG 2916R2 NK 27 J7 Latham L2948R2 Channel 3008R2 Latham L3248R2 Stine 30RE02 Asgrow 2931 NK 34 Z1 NK 32 L8 Mycogen 5N275R2 Asgrow 3432 NK 34 N3 Asgrow 3231 Hoegemeyer 3303NRR Hoegemeyer 3004NRR Asgrow 2433 Hoegemeyer 2993NRR Channel 3106R2 Mycogen 5N284R2 Producers 2900NR2 NK 29 V2 Hoegemeyer 2511NRR Latham E2920R2X Asgrow 2431 Producers 2408NR2 NK S28 K1 LG C2605 PI 88788 Peking Cyst-X Susceptible 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Yield (bu/a) LSD = 4.3 (90% confidence)